Date post: | 02-Jun-2018 |
Category: |
Documents |
Upload: | abyabraham5005 |
View: | 223 times |
Download: | 0 times |
of 18
8/10/2019 Exxonmobil Presentation Agdc May 7 2014
1/18
Alaska LNG ProjectConcept Information
Work Product In Progress
Alaska LNG Project
Project Overview with AGDC
Anchorage, Alaska
May 7, 2014
8/10/2019 Exxonmobil Presentation Agdc May 7 2014
2/18
Alaska LNG ProjectConcept Information
Work Product In Progress
Alaska LNG Project - Overview
Alaska LNG Plant
Conceptual Layout
Results ofURS ArcGISLocation SuitabilityScreening Study
- 1 -
Lead LNG Plant Site Selection- Extensive Analysis of SouthCentral coast
- 20+ options analyzed; 4-5 sites feasible
- Geotechnical, construction, operation issues
Lead LNG Plant SiteNikiski Industrial Area
BP, ConocoPhillips, ExxonMobil, TransCanada and the State ofAlaska are working together to progress the Alaska LNG project:- 300+ people involved in project design work-
Multiple third party contractors engaged many Alaskan- Leveraging Denali, APP, related material ($700M past work)- Preliminary capital estimate - $45-65 Billion (2012 dollars)
Key project design accomplishments to date:- Integrated Basis of Design heat/material balance complete- Confirmed ability to integrate into existing operations- Completed project design, announced concept Feb13- Finalized lead LNG plant site decision, announced Oct13
Completed 2013 Summer Field Season:- Cultural resource assessment (>6,500 acres)- Hydrology / Lakes / Fisheries studied (37 / 17 / 20)- Traditional knowledge, subsistence, ethnographic surveys- 150 people involved
Key project issues to address:- Mega-project challenges (labor, resources, equipment, etc.)-
Uncertainty related to permit timing / scope- Commercial/fiscal issues with all parties, including State
The ARC of Success- Al ignment four primary resource owners, working together- Risk reduction identify / mitigate risk and uncertainty- Cost low cost wins, defines competiveness/viability
8/10/2019 Exxonmobil Presentation Agdc May 7 2014
3/18
Alaska LNG ProjectConcept Information
Work Product In Progress2
Alaska LNG Concept Summary - Upstream
PTU (62 miles east of PBU/GTP area)
Initial Production System (IPS) project in progress - 2016 SU
Preliminary AK LNG design basis for PTU: Leverage IPS facilities, add fourteen new wells
Add new gas facilities to existing central pad / facilities
New 30 gas line from PTU to GTP in Prudhoe Bay
Peak workforce 500-1,500 people
PBU Tie-in (adjacent to proposed GTP location)
Installation / tie-in managed by Prudhoe Bay Operator
Tie into existing CGF, deliver gas to new Gas Treatment Plant
Gas project / deliveries tied to future PBU operations
Preliminary plan is to inject CO2 using existing injection systems
as appropriate
PTU Field Layout
Process
Utilities
PowerGeneration
Point Thomson
Central Pad
Compression
PBU Central Gas Facilit y Tie-in
8/10/2019 Exxonmobil Presentation Agdc May 7 2014
4/18
Alaska LNG ProjectConcept Information
Work Product In Progress
Alaska LNG
Pipeline Elevation Design Example
Potential
Pipeline Routes
Alaska LNG Concept Summary - Pipeline
Gas Pipeline and Compression Stations
800+ mile 42 x80 pipeline
3-3.5 billion cubic feet gas per day
Eight compressor stations (30kHP each) Pipeline contents will be treated gas, impurities removed at NS GTP
Designed to manage continuous and discontinuous permafrost regions
Expansion potential with additional compression if appropriate
Refining route based on summer field information, continued design work
Five off-take points for Alaska gas delivery
Peak workforce 3,500 - 5,000 people
8/10/2019 Exxonmobil Presentation Agdc May 7 2014
5/18
Alaska LNG ProjectConcept Information
Work Product In Progress4
Alaska LNG - Concept Summary GTP / LNG Plants
NS Gas Treatment Plant
Defined PBU integration for gas inlet, discharge
Designed to remove gas impurities
Four amine trains with compression, dehydration and chilling
Prime power generation (5 units, 54kHP)
All required utilities, infrastructure and camps
Facility will be modularized, sealifted to location
Peak workforce 500-2,000 people
LNG Plant, Storage and Marine Facility
Three 5.8 million tons per annum (MTA) LNG trains (17-18MTA)
- Plant receives 2.2 - 2.5 billion cubic feet per day to liquefy
- LNG production varies with ambient temp (4.9 - 6.3 MTA)
- Small volume of stabilized condensate (~1,000 bbl/day)
Integrated utility system with all utilities on site
Three 160,000 cubic meter LNG storage tanks
Conventional jetty with two berths (15-20 LNG Carriers)
Peak workforce 3,500 5,000 people for LNG plant
Peak workforce 1,000 1,500 people for marine facility
Evaluating modularization to manage risks
NS Gas Treatment Plant
LNG Plant and Storage
8/10/2019 Exxonmobil Presentation Agdc May 7 2014
6/18
Alaska LNG ProjectConcept Information
Work Product In Progress- 5 -- 5 -
Objectives:
Identify 3-5 sites viable for series of LNG trains and associatedMarine Terminal in close proximity
Site must be suitable as termination point for feed gas pipeline and for
LNG carrier load-out
Deliverable:
One primary lead LNG plant site with suitable alternate sites
Process:
Acceptability determined by extensive review process from companyand contract experts evaluating 50+ distinctive criteria (12mo process)
Parallel/independent ArcGIS analysis
Quantitative Risk Analysis (QRA) used to integrate analysis
A parallel path Site Selection process that uses independent approaches and provides checks & balances.
Alaska LNG - Site Selection Process
InitialList of
21 Sites
8 RecommendedSites Based on
Analysis of GIS
GISSuitabilityAreas
1stSME FlawScreening(13 Sites)
2nd SME FlawScreening(8 Sites)
Reconciled List of 8Common Sites
Location Shift ToMatch Terrain
Lead SiteSelected
Expert Input toSupport
Evaluation
SME Common Listof 8 Sites
ConceptualEngineering for5 Validated
Rep. Locations
Continued ExpertInput to Support
Evaluation
VMT Co-locationConsidered
QRA forRepresentative
Sites
SiteAcceptabi li ty
Marine
LNG Siting
ERL
Geotechnical
StakeholderImpacts
PipelineApproach
8/10/2019 Exxonmobil Presentation Agdc May 7 2014
7/18
Alaska LNG ProjectConcept Information
Work Product In Progress6
Alaska LNG Lead Site Design Work
NRC Ice Modeling of Cook Inlet Ice
LNG Plant Site Selection
Announced Nikiski area, on the Kenai Peninsula as lead site in Oct13
Extensive data acquisition program in 2012 to evaluate multiple sites
Focus on geotechnical, marine, civil, and pipeline approach issues- Particular focus on seismicity, faults/folds, volcanic, tsunami risks
- Evaluate marine bathymetry, metocean, navigation, infrastructure issues
Assess constructability and long term operations
Preliminary emissions modeling complete
Nikiski area development requires less civil /construction work than other sites
Marine Viability Assessment
Design focused on conventional LNG carriers (~160,000 mt3)
Engaged local Alaskan pilots, evaluated marine operations
Completed maneuverability study to demonstrate ability to safely moor, load
Evaluating tug effectiveness, required support for terminal
Extensive modeling with international agencies to confirm intrinsically safe design
Completed site visits to existing operations with similar marine environments Gathering additional metocean data to validate design
http://www.google.com/url?sa=i&rct=j&q=lng+ship+cook+inlet+ice&source=images&cd=&cad=rja&docid=pq33lFvM2FPTpM&tbnid=TQr39I2kfTZLbM:&ved=0CAUQjRw&url=http://www.arcticgas.gov/lng-cold-facts-about-hot-commodity&ei=tcyCUYGCBJD88QTwq4CwCQ&bvm=bv.45960087,d.dmQ&psig=AFQjCNHAIGY2iYxiu91Qq1NRj8OyBOXXLw&ust=13676129713573618/10/2019 Exxonmobil Presentation Agdc May 7 2014
8/18
Alaska LNG ProjectConcept Information
Work Product In Progress
Recent Progress - Prudhoe Bay
7
Prudhoe Bay
Continued data capture/analysis of PBU gas
composition
Evaluated field dehydration performance
Continuing depletion planning
Developing integrated injection system
Evaluating integrated power grid
Preliminary CO2Re-Injection Design
Prudhoe Bay Unit Central Gas Facility
Preliminary CO2Re-InjectionDesign
69KV PBU Power Grid
8/10/2019 Exxonmobil Presentation Agdc May 7 2014
9/18
Alaska LNG ProjectConcept Information
Work Product In Progress
Recent Progress - Point Thomson
8
Point Thomson
Comparing plot plan options for
safety and operability
Evaluated process design
requirements
Developing design basis for future
engineering work
Point Thomson Unit Central Pad
8/10/2019 Exxonmobil Presentation Agdc May 7 2014
10/18
Alaska LNG ProjectConcept Information
Work Product In Progress
Recent Progress Gas Treatment Plant
9
Gas Treatment Plant
Confirmed viability of 3 train design, aligns
gas treatment plan with LNG plant Finalized CO2design / handling basis
Working to modularize plant design
Evaluating sealift plans / orderNS Gas Treatment Plant Sealift Option Exampl e
8/10/2019 Exxonmobil Presentation Agdc May 7 2014
11/18
Alaska LNG ProjectConcept Information
Work Product In Progress
Recent Progress Pipeline
Pipeline
Refined route from PBU to Livengood, finalizing
route from Livengood to Cook Inlet
Working special design areas
- Atigun Pass - Denali National Park Area
- Yukon River - Cook Inlet
- Progressing fundamental technical work on
geohazard analysis, waterway crossings,
hydraulics and design
Denali Park Area
10
Pipeline Hydraulic Model Example Compressor Station Locations
Proposed Pipeline Route
DENALI NATIONAL PARK COOK INLET
8/10/2019 Exxonmobil Presentation Agdc May 7 2014
12/18
Alaska LNG ProjectConcept Information
Work Product In Progress
Recent Progress LNG Plant
11
LNG Plant and Marine
Lead site selected
Completed plans for metocean data gathering
Ambient air monitoring stations / plan finalized
Progressing work on LNG capacity and
technology
Results ofURS ArcGISLocation SuitabilityScreening Study
Lead LNG Plant Site Selection- Extensive Analysis of SouthCentral coast
- 20+ options analyzed; 4-5 sites feasible- Geotechnical, construction, operation issues
Lead LNG Plant Site
Nikiski Industrial Area
8/10/2019 Exxonmobil Presentation Agdc May 7 2014
13/18
Alaska LNG ProjectConcept Information
Work Product In Progress
Recent Progress Environmental, Regulatory and Land
Cultural Resource
Survey Areas
Environmental, Regulatory and Land
Safe summer field season 2013
No incidents for >40,000 man-hours, 90,000 miles
No reportable spills or public complaints
Peak workforce of over 130 contractor staff
completed survey work from PBU to Livengood
Over 6,500 acres surveyed for cultural resources
Over 75 hydrology, lakes and fisheries surveyed
Traditional knowledge and ethnographic surveys
8/10/2019 Exxonmobil Presentation Agdc May 7 2014
14/18
Alaska LNG ProjectConcept Information
Work Product In Progress
Forward Plan - Environmental, Regulatory and Land
Plans for a safe 2014 field season
Civil and scientific surveys from Livengood to Nikiski
Subsistence and health impact surveys
Marine current and ice profiling
Geotechnical and geophysical surveys
Collaboration with state and federal agencies for
permitting and approvals
Local community engagement for field study scopes
8/10/2019 Exxonmobil Presentation Agdc May 7 2014
15/18
Att h t 1
8/10/2019 Exxonmobil Presentation Agdc May 7 2014
16/18
Southcentral Alaska LNG Integrated Team
Producing FieldsLead: BP
PipelinesLead: Alaska Pipeline Project
LNG PlantLead: ConocoPhillips
Integration TeamLead: ExxonMobil
Commercial TeamLead: BP
Concept TeamLead: ExxonMobil
Management Committee
Technical
Committee
Multimillion Dollar, Four-Company Effort 125+ Employees, 100+ Contractors
Joint work commenced March 31, 2012 after completion of the Pt. Thomson Settlement / joint work agreements
Cooperative effort among the leading North Slope producers and a leading North American pipeline company
Identified potentially viable LNG project options to monetize ANS natural gas
Used company strengths, shared information / expertise; built upon past efforts, sought out new ideas
Attachment 1
Att h t 2
8/10/2019 Exxonmobil Presentation Agdc May 7 2014
17/18
Alaska Southcentral LNG Project Concept Description
Gas TreatingLocated at North Slope or Southcentral LNG siteRemove CO2and other gases and dispose / useFootprint: 150 - 250 acresPeak Workforce: 500 - 2,000 peopleRequired Steel: 250,000 - 300,000 tonsAmong largest in world
Liquefaction Plant Capacity: 15 18 million tonnes per annum (MTA)
3 trains (5-6 MTA / train) Potential areas: 22 sites assessed in Cook Inlet, Prince
William Sound and other Southcentral sites Footprint: 400 - 500 acres Peak Workforce: 3,500 - 5,000 people Required Steel: 100,000-150,000 tons
Storage / Loading LNG Storage Tanks, Terminal Dock; 1 - 2 Jetties Design based on 15 20 tankers Peak Workforce: 1,000-1,500 people
Estimated Total Cost: $45 $65+ Bil lion Peak Construct ion Workforce: 9,000 15,000 jobs
Operations Workforce: ~1000 jobs in Alaska
Attachment 2
Descriptions and cost s are preliminary in nature and subject to change. Cost range excludes inflation.
PipelineLarge diameter: 42- 48 operating at >2,000 psiCapacity: 3 - 3.5 billion cubic feet per dayLength: ~800 miles (similar to TAPS)Peak Workforce: 3,500 - 5,000 peopleRequired Steel: 600,000 - 1,200,000 tons
State off-take: ~5 points, 300-350 million cubicfeet per day, based on demand
Producing Fields~35 TCF discovered North Slope resourceAdditional exploration potentialAnchored by Prudhoe Bay and Pt. Thomson with
~20 years supply availableUse of existing and new North Slope facilitiesConfirmed range of gas blends from PBU/PTU cangenerate marketable LNG product
Peak Workforce: 500 1,500 people
Attachment 3
8/10/2019 Exxonmobil Presentation Agdc May 7 2014
18/18
GO
LNGProject
Oper
ations
Execute: Final engineering Financing Procurement Fabricate / Logistics / Construct Prepare for Operations
Complete Govt / Reg. Issues: Secure remaining construction
/ operating permits Stakeholder engagement
Implement businessstructure & agreements
Commission / start-up
Southcentral Alaska LNG Work Plans / Key Decision Points
Evaluate:
Range of technically viableoptions for major projectcomponents
Business Structure In-state gas / export LNG demand
Screen commercial viability
Viable Technical Option(s) Identified Government Support Permits / Land Use Achievable
Potential Commercial Viability
Requirements to Take Next Step:
Progress :
Preliminary engineering torefine concept
Business structure Financing plan
Start individ ual gas / LNGsales / shipping efforts
Assess commercial vi abi lit y
Viable technical option Government Support Permits / Land Use Underway
Potential Commercial Viability
Activities
Complete:
Front-end engineering & design Major contract preparation Business structure Financing arrangements
Solicit Interest of Others
Advance Govt / Reg. Iss ues : Key permit / land use approvals Stakeholder engagement Secure DOE Export License
Execute individ ual gas / LNGsales / shipping agreements
Confirm comm ercial viability
Secure Permits / Land Use / Financing /Key Commercial Agreements
Confirm Commercial Viability
Execute EPC contracts
Attachment 3
Peak Staffing: ~200 400 - 500 500 1,500 9,000 15,000
Cost ($): Tens of Millions Hundreds of Millions Billions Tens of Billions
Est. Engineering / Technical Duration*: 12 - 18 Months 2 - 3 Years 5 - 6 Years
ConceptSelection
Pre-FEED
FEED(Front-End
Engineering &Design)
EPC(Engineering,
Procurement &Construction)
Decisionto Build the
ProjectDecision Decision
(Today)
PTUSettlement,Joint Work
Agreements
* NOTE: Duration of various phases may be extended by protracted resolution of fiscal terms, permittin g and regulatory delays, legal challenges,changes in com modit y market outlook, time to secure long-term LNG contracts, labor sho rtages, material & equipm ent availability, weather, etc.
GO GO GO
Solicit Interest of Others
Establish Government Support and Advance Regulatory Issues: Competitive oil tax environment; predictable / durable LNG project fiscal
terms; AGIA Issues Assure ability to secure regulatory approvals / permits / land use Environmental activities / Technical data collection Stakeholder engagement File DOE Export License