+ All Categories
Home > Education > Eye-Tracking in Instructional Videos

Eye-Tracking in Instructional Videos

Date post: 15-Apr-2017
Category:
Upload: nathan-garrett
View: 1,010 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend
26
Eye-Tracking in Instructional Videos Nathan Garrett, PhD Woodbury University (Los Angeles) Slides available at http://profgarrett.com Email [email protected] Presented at ISECON 2015
Transcript
Page 1: Eye-Tracking in Instructional Videos

Eye-Tracking in Instructional Videos

Nathan Garrett, PhDWoodbury University (Los Angeles)

Slides available at http://profgarrett.comEmail [email protected]

Presented at ISECON 2015

Page 2: Eye-Tracking in Instructional Videos

AbstractThis project examined the impact of different multimedia designs in instructional videos. An eye-tracking machine recorded learners while they were shown a slide presentation alongside a video of the instructor. Learners frequently switched between the video and slides, on average every 2.4 seconds. Speakers who gestured, repeated keywords, or began new points often sparked these switches. The switch patterns were evaluated using Multimedia Learning Theory to determine what they might reveal about the cognitive load of the presentation on the learner. The switches appear to show synchronization attempts (or failures) between the speaker and the multimedia, and yield insight for managing optimal cognitive load. Interviews clarified these eye-tracking results, and together they confirm and expand several helpful guidelines for multimedia use in instructional videos.

Page 3: Eye-Tracking in Instructional Videos

What do we know about video-based learning?• 3-6% increase in learning• Or not… (depending on academic discipline)

• Students like videos• Increases Social Presence (sense of connection)• Richer media

• How can we improve them with analytic data?

Page 4: Eye-Tracking in Instructional Videos

Media Learning TheoryProcesses• Selection• Organize• Integrate

Avoid Cognitive overload

Page 5: Eye-Tracking in Instructional Videos

Method: Eye-tracking• Frequently used in web usability studies

Page 6: Eye-Tracking in Instructional Videos

Half of viewers’ time on face

Extends “Showing Face in Video Instruction: Effects on Information Retention, Visual Attention, and Affect” by Kizilcec, Papadopoulos, and Sritanyaratana

Page 7: Eye-Tracking in Instructional Videos

Experimental Research Design• MBA & undergraduate business students (n=22)• 5 minute recorded presentations• Eye Tracker• Survey • Interview

Page 8: Eye-Tracking in Instructional Videos

Experimental Research Design

Page 9: Eye-Tracking in Instructional Videos

Experimental Research Design

Page 10: Eye-Tracking in Instructional Videos

Data Analysis1. Replication

2. Modeling

3. Visualization

4. Qualitative

Page 11: Eye-Tracking in Instructional Videos

1. Replication

Original Study This Study

Average time spent before transitioning 3.6 seconds 2.3 seconds

Time spent on video 41% 65%✔

Page 12: Eye-Tracking in Instructional Videos

2. Modeling

Changes to n by splitting

presentations

Page 13: Eye-Tracking in Instructional Videos

3. Visualization• 10s = 4 transitions• 20s = 7 transitions• 60s = 20 transitions

Page 14: Eye-Tracking in Instructional Videos
Page 15: Eye-Tracking in Instructional Videos

Initial (~3-4) seconds on slide

Page 16: Eye-Tracking in Instructional Videos

People respond to instructor’s gestures

Page 17: Eye-Tracking in Instructional Videos

People respond to instructor’s gesturesand content

The instructor explains that CouchSurfing is registered as a B corporation, but does not look at the slides or use body language to focus the audience’s

attention on the slides.

Indicates viewers are synchronizating visual & audio information

Page 18: Eye-Tracking in Instructional Videos

Visually interesting slides get more attention

Page 19: Eye-Tracking in Instructional Videos

Viewers respond to speaker’s repeated phrases

Speaker went off slides

Page 20: Eye-Tracking in Instructional Videos

Reading numbers gets a lot of attention

Page 21: Eye-Tracking in Instructional Videos

4. Qualitative Themes• The presentation and the PowerPoint slides meshed well together.

(Participant 5)

Page 22: Eye-Tracking in Instructional Videos

4. Qualitative ThemesText-heavy Slides

• What he was saying and what was on the PowerPoint didn’t coincide with each other… Make sure what he says and what’s on the slide are the same thing. (Participant 5)

• Way too much writing… Design was good, but it was hard to follow what he was saying while at the same time reading the slides. (Participant 11)

Page 23: Eye-Tracking in Instructional Videos

4. Qualitative ThemesText-light (picture-heavy) slides

• Because her PowerPoint was just pictures, it didn’t seem like she put effort making the PowerPoint and whatever she was talking about really didn’t make sense… Want more content basically… (Participant 5)

• Felt like kind of a childish presentation. I like to see some writing at least… to me it’s kind of irrelevant, makes it harder to follow the topic. (Participant 11)

Page 24: Eye-Tracking in Instructional Videos

4. Qualitative Themes• Learners disliked text-heavy slides due to synchronization problem• Learners disliked text-light slide due to lack of signposting

Page 25: Eye-Tracking in Instructional Videos

Research Conclusions• Eye movements align with MLT

• Sparklines are useful visualization tool

• Eye movements can be used to reduce Cognitive Load in videos

Page 26: Eye-Tracking in Instructional Videos

What does this mean for when we make videos?• Pause 3-10s on new slides

• Avoids overload during initial skim

• Make slides easily skimmed • Since learners are transitioning every 3-4s

• Help learners synchronize slides and gaze

• Avoid overload• Have all points on the slide• Don’t have so much content that they miss key points


Recommended