.--- -.-- . .. _- --
Ahmedabad
THE lNDlA.N EXPRESS, WEDNESDAY, J A~JUARY 3, 201 8
F arn1 prices could hold key to several political fortunes
"',,j
BY H ARTSH DAMODARAN ca PARTHA SARATHI BISWAS
EXPRESS EDITORS "INTERPRET
2017 was agriculture's anntls horribilis. "The reaSOIl wasn't monsoon failure (as in 2014 and 2015) orunseasOl,al rain and hail (as in March 2015 ):·the yearwas, in facr, largely free of extreme weather events, resu lting in a . record output of wheat. pulses, cotton, potato alld a host of other crops.
Yet, fanners vented their anger in protests in Maharashtra, Madhya Pradesh and R~asthanduringJune-September, and in the Gujarat Assembly elections that saw the BJP suffer heavy reverses in mral a,;eas. The reason fortheirdiscontentwaspr:ices.
Agricultura l prices crashed in April-June, just when a bumper ralJi crop had been harve~tecl after two years of drough t, and despite demonetisation. The disappointment from not seeing incomes grow even as product ion increased. sparked unrest barely three months afterthe B]P's landslide victory iri the Uttar Pradesh elections. Betweeri that resu lt in March and that of Gujarat in December. the swing in the rurill mood was perceptible. . .
Table 1 (right) shows average prices for 10 major crops in the agriculture produce rnandis qflcey growing states. The prices are for November, the month of peak arrivals in most khan/crops. Rates were lower t1lan not only official minimum support prices (MSf's), but a~o the levels of November 2016, the month of demonetisation. Of the 10 crops, arhar(pigeon pca) is harvested mainly injallUJ ry, and potato ill Februa-ry-f\.1arrh. But then' selJing below MSP even before the start of the marketing season tells the story o[the decline of agricultural prices.
A change to that stoty is currently not in sight The government, which was slow to respond to the crisjs from depressed pro~ duC€'r realisations, tried tota!ku~ prices from the second halfof2017 - a shift away from the hawkish policy on food intlation that marked its first three years.
Stockholding limits on pulses were lifted inMay, followed by the imposition of quan- ' titative caps on imports - 200,000 tonnes for or/lOr and 300,000 tonnes for umd (black gram) and moong(greengrarn) per year - in August. In September, export restrictions on arhar. moong and urad were lifted.1l1is was extended to other pul.ses in November, along with the clamping of a 50% import duty on white peas. November also·witnessed a doubling of tariff on wheat to 20% and similar hikes for all edible oils, In December. a 30% duty was levied on chana (chickpea) and maSlJr (lentil) imports. Stockholding and tlJrnover limits on sugar traders, too, were withdrawn.
These measures VI/ere ineffective for two mrlin reJsons.
. first. they were rather belated. Take, for instance. pulses. whose prooucticn rose over 40% to an all-lime-high of 22.95 million tonnes{mt} in 2016-17. Tha.t farmers were going to harvest a huge crop was known since.Jale-2016, wilen market prices ilad already pLunged below MSPs. But by tl~e. [ime the government acted. an unprecedented 551 mt of pulses had already been importee!. It will probably take a drought now to clear the supply overhang.
Secondly, overseas suppliers reacted to the higher import duties in India by simply slashing prices. Si"nce November J6 - the day before l)?sic CustOlTlS duties on crude palm oil and deguolmed soyabean oi l were raised ta 30%fromI5%and 175%respectively-tbe
'"
GroundllUt(GuJarat) 3,790-'17 .:: 4;06133 Cotton (Gujarat) 4,475.59 4.912.59 Soy.bean (MP) · 2,57833 2,839,19 8ttjm (Rajasthan) 1.173.36 1,414 .79
Maize(Kaniataka) ·1,173211 I, 1,399.&1 jowar(Mahdrashtra) 1,621.76 1,62724 UllId(UP) 3,55126 . i 6,435,93
Moong(Rajastban) 4,270.96 · I 4,529,88
Arh~r(lcarn.t.lca) . 3.946.41 I 6,76122' ··
Potato (UP) '. 433,07 91355 ""Inclusive o!Gujarot government's (SO/quinml bonus: " InclusiVe o!Gloamt gavernment's fSOO/quintal bonus; """Procurement rate under Market Intervention Schemefor UP. Source:·agmorknet.gov.in.
4,R20" 3,050 1,4~5
1,42~
1,700 S:40() 5.575 5,450
487"'u
TABLE 2: PROFILE OrRURAL HOUSEHOLDS MlD DEPENDENCE ON AGRICULTURE
·T · Nlunbel:"~f""-"--'N~;;;b~-~f'-I rural agrirultural
households households
Andhra Pradesh
Assam
Bihar
Chhattisgarh '
Gujarat
Hary?'1a
Jharkhaoo
Karnataka ! I
Keral. i Madhya Pradesh ! ·Maharashtra I
Odisha
Punjab
Rajasthan
Tamil Nadu
Te!angam
Ulta.- Pr.1desh
inlaldl (1)
86.76
52,49
'140,61
37.47
58,72
25.85
3752
77.43
5138
84.67
125.18
78.12
27.55
82,72
93.61
4931
- 24133
inlakh (2)
35.97
34,23
70,94
25.61
3.931
15.69
2234 ,
42.42
14.04
59.95
70.97
44.94
14.08
64.84
3244
2539
130,49
(2) as%of
(1 )
415
65.2
505
683
66,9
60,7
59.5
54.8
273
70,8
56.7
57.5
S1.1
78.4
34.7
515
74;8
i % share 'I offann income
I fOj .
(i)'
5\,8
74.8
i [ i ' 56.0
i !
643
. 61.4
72.8
56,0
62.6
345
765
595
54,7
693
55,9
43.2
72,9
£9;0 · , i
West Bengal ! 141.35 , 63,62 , 45.0 i 30.3
~m~-;m~~~_~1i
*%shi:!re of income of agricultural households earnedfrom cultivation and animal husb(lJldry. Source: Naaonol Sample Sun",), Office daca!or 2012· 13 crop yearUuly-jllne J.
lllu~rnltion: Subrata Dhar
E XPLAINING WHAT TO EXPECT
2018 P,I\RT7:THE FARM
SECTOR TOMORROW, SOCIAL MEDiA
landed cost of Cl1lde palm oil in Mumbai has fallen from $ 710 to $ 657 per tonne, while ,that of degummed soyabean oil has come down from $ 843 to $ 80l Australian chickpea is landing at $ 620 per· tonne today, as against $ 7251evels two months ago.
TheUS Depaltment of Agiiculture is now projecting the highest-ever g!opal closing stocks of wheat and rice for 2017-18 UlIneMay), and record production of oilseeds, sugar and milk. In this scenario, the challenge of ensuring remlH1erative producer prices will be greater. While there is MSPbased proCl1fef(lent of wheat and rice, no sllch assurance of price support .exists for other crops.
Crops that could face imm~diate price· pressl!res in the coming months include chana and onions. Farmers have this time sown 10.2 mill ion hectares under chana, a 14,I%jump over last year. While this crop is due fo r harves tii1g in FebruarY-March,
. prices in Indore, Akola and othermandisare alrea9Y at Rs 3.750-3,800 per quintal. well below the MSP of Rs 4,400. A similar price crash cannbt be ruled out for onions, when the late-khan} anQ.robi crops start arriving : after mid-JanualY and March respectively .. Once again, it is quite likely that by the time existing stockholding limits and expOIt re-: : strictions are-removed, fanners would have suffered the consequen.ces Qf having planted more area in response to last year's high prices.
Sugar, too, saw good prices and timely payments by mills to cane farmers last year. But the problem of glut and build-up of cane arrears could resurface as Maharashtrasees a production recovery. and as output in Uttar Pradesh crosses the expected 10 mt for the first time in this'season. Global oversupply will not help matterS - which is also the case with milk. SI<im milk powder quoted at $ 1,675 per tonne in the NewZealand dairyg;ant Fonterra's fortnightly online auction platfonn on December 19, compared to $ 2,621 a year ago. Withgau rakshak activism at home leading to • virtual collapse of the cattle trade, farmers' worries may oniy grow. The inability to dispose of animals that have ceased to be useful, even while feeding on standing crops, could well emerge as a political flashpoi nt in the days ~head.
Many believe that agriculture's political relevance may have diminished, especially in St.1teS with relatively large urban shares of population such as Tamil Nadu (48.45%), Kerala (47,72%), Maharashtra (4523%) and Gujarat (42.58%). It is "lso argued that "rural".is no longer just agliculturaL 11,at may, indeed, be true for states where less than 50% of nlral households are "agricultural" (with at least one member employed in farming1 and barely half of their incomes come from cultiva tion and animal husbandlY As Table 2 .(left) shows, in I(erala, Tamil Nadu, West Bengal and Andhra Pradesh,agricultureper se generates a small s.l1are of rural incomes.
. However, this does not apply to most other states - inc1udrng Madhya Pradesh. Uttar Pradesh, Rajasthan, Chhattisgarh, or even Gujarat.Agrarian distress can be f<.1ctor in these states. as election results even in "urbanised" Gujarat showed, It could be an even bigger factor in fou r major sta tes - MP, Rajasthan, Chhattisgarh and Kamataka -that go to Assembly polls this year,