+ All Categories
Home > Documents > F E C D D C F E D C F E D C H F E D C H F E D C H F E D C A...Shah N, Bhattacharya R, Sarkar B,...

F E C D D C F E D C F E D C H F E D C H F E D C H F E D C A...Shah N, Bhattacharya R, Sarkar B,...

Date post: 05-Sep-2020
Category:
Upload: others
View: 4 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend
1
Value Engineering in System of Cryoline and Cryodistribution for ITER: In-kind Contribution from INDIA INTRODUCTION B. Sarkar 1 , N. Shah 1 , H. Vaghela 1 , R. Bhattacharya 1 , K. Choukekar 1 , P. Patel 1 , H. Chang 2 , S. Badgujar 2 , M. Chalifour 2 1 ITER-India, Institute for Plasma Research, Bhat, Gandhinagar 382428, India; 2 ITER Organization, Route de Vinon-sur-Verdon, CS 90 046, 13067 St. Paul Lez Durance Cedex, France Presented at the Cryogenic Engineering Conference and International Cryogenic Materials Conference, 2015 June 28-July 2, Tucson, Arizona; Program I.D. number: C1PoD-08 [C30] The ITER cryogenic system consists of three main subsystems; the Cryoplant, the Cryo-distribution (CD), as well as the system of Cryoline (CL) and Warmlines (WL) systems. The CD and CL systems are part of the in-kind supply from India. The cryoplants provide the required cooling power for the clients, namely, the superconducting magnet system, Cryo-pumps and thermal shield for the main cryostat. The CD system controls and manipulates the different operational scenario of ITER and the CL system establishes the two way communication of the required flow of cryogen as per the ITER cryogenic process with the structured network of multi (two to eight) and single process pipe cryolines. Basis of Risk, Analysis and its Mitigation Likelihood of Occurrence Impact or Consequence Negligible (1) Marginal (2) Significant (3) Critical (4) Crisis (5) Very Likely (5) Low (5) Medium (20) High (45) Very High (80) Very High (125) Likely (4) Low (4) Medium (16) High (36) High (64) Very High (100) Unlikely (3) Low (3) Medium (12) Medium (27) High (48) High (75) Very Unlikely (2) Low (2) Low (8) Medium (18) Medium (32) High (50) Not Credible (1) Low (1) Low (4) Low (9) Medium (16) Medium (25) ITER Cryodistribution System ITER Cryolines System Specifications ITER Cryolines PTCL OVJ Size DN 100 to DN 1000 DN 600 Number of process pipes 1 to 7 6 Length ~ 5000 m 27 m Segments Straight, Tee, Elbow, Z Straight, Tee, Elbow, Z Quality Classes QC 1*, QC 2 QC 1 Seismic Classes SC1 (SF)*, SC1 (S), SC2, NSC SC1 (S) Safety Classes SIC-II*, SR, Non-SIC Non-SIC Fluids Helium, Nitrogen Helium Temperature levels 4.5K, 50K, 80K, 300K 4.5K, 80K, 300K Pressure of process fluid Maximum 21 bar 21 bar (design), max. 6.5 bar (cold test) Major Technical specifications of ITER Cryolines and PTCL Planning and Synchronization – Development of Prototype Cryoline (PTCL) with ITER Cryolines The high risk zone due to the availability of ‘limited resources of industrial partners’ and their understanding on the technical specifications was found to have both direct and indirect cascading impact on the technical performance of the system of CLs for ITER. A four-step process was implemented starting from global expression of interest with pre-qualification, PTCL design followed by fabrication and test The technical uncertainty of the overall CL system was mitigated by selecting particular segments in the PTCL such as ‘T,’ C-sections with different angles, straight section and a specific out of plane ‘Z’ sections. System optimization – Individual cold compressors over Common cold compressor F LHe Bath E E F C D D C E F E F D C F E LHe Bath D C H F E D C H LHe Bath F E D C H LHe Bath LHe Bath F E D C A F D C E A H C F D E GN2 LN2 11 CTBs of PF & CC coils 6 CTBs of CS coils 9 CTBs of TF coils 12 CVBs of Cryopumps for Cryostat, NB & Torus 3 CVBs of magnet structures 2 CVBs of Thermal Shield CCB ACB-ST ACB-PF ACB-CS ACB-TF ACB-CP LHe Plant (3 Units) CTCB 80K Loop (2 Units) Legends A: LHe Header C: SHe Supply Header D: 4.8 K Return Header E: 80 K Supply Header F: 100 K Return Header H: 50 K Supply Header Storage (4.5 K LHe, 300 K GHe, 80 K LN2, 300 K GN2, 80 K Quench Tank, Gas Bag) LN2 Plant (2 Units) *most stringent Conclusion Common cold compressor configuration, requires one cold compressor of capacity ~2.1 kg/s, which calls industrial up scaling or development. Individual cold compressors provide flexibility to operate each ACB at different temperature level as well as reduces the maximum mass flow rate for compressor. Maximum mass flow rate requirement is now restricted to 0.6 kg/s, 0.8 kg/s and 1.3 kg/s for ACB-TF, CS and ST respectively. ‘Very high’ and ‘high’ risks brought down to ‘medium’ and ‘low’ level with implementation of prototyping both in CD and CL The PTCL design, the development of two CCPs by two industrial collaborations - a blessing towards the further development Above planning and actual implementation as well as value engineering has enabled ITER-India to enter in to the industrial level of development for CL and CD system of ITER. Acknowledgements Authors would like to thank the colleagues from ITER-India, ITER Organization in St. Paul Lez Durance France as well as industrial partners namely M/s INOX India Limited (India) and their consortium partner, M/s Air Liquide Advanced Technologies (France), M/s Linde Kryotechnik (Switzerland), M/s Barber Nichols Inc. (USA), M/s IHI (Japan), M/s Tayyo Nippon Sanso (Japan) Group X (Process Pipe: > 3) Group Y (Process Pipe: 1,2 or max. 3) Total length is ~ 5 km Sizes: DN 100 to DN1000 Complex Routing with large number of bends at odd angles, branches 37 types of VJ lines Spread in Tokamak building, plant bridge, and cryoplant area Tight positional tolerances for installation ~ 70m ITER Cryolines CL inside tokamak building CL inside Cryoplant area ~ 130 m The CD system of ITER is specifically configured for a fusion machine, meaning thereby managing of steady state heat load, dynamic heat load arising from the magnets system as well as nuclear heating and supporting the operational scenarios. In parallel to the conceptual design, market survey to identify the cryogenic industries that can strongly support to accomplish the CD project was started through the pre- qualification process Process pipes CC, CD, C, CR ~ 4.5 K Process Pipe E, F ~ 80K Design-1 OVJ: DN600 Q (@4.5K): 0.88 W/m Q (@80K): 4.33 W/m No. of segments: 4 Avg. weight: 376 kg/m Major Requirements OVJ < DN600 Q (@4.5K) < 1.2 W/m Q (@80K) < 4.5 W/m No. of segments: shall be minimized Avg. weight: shall be minimized Design-2 OVJ: DN600 Q (@4.5K): 0.98 W/m Q (@80K): 3.73 W/m No. of segments: 5 Avg. Weight: 254 kg/m Two designs of PTCL PTCL (mock up) Test Box A LHe Dewar Test Box C Test Box B 80K Cold Box View of ITER-India cryogenic facility (ready for PTCL test) C1PoD-08 [C30] Developed taking in to account the technical requirements of the major components such as CCPs, valves, heat exchangers, filters, instrumentation, etc. Technical risk mitigation and Value engineering: Cold Circulating Pumps and its test Cold Circulating Pumps (CCP) Test ACB (TACB) First of a kind technical specification in terms of mass flow, pressure head and variation in input conditions (i.e. P & T). In all modes of operation inclusive of 110 % of mass flow, more than 70 % efficiency required. By optimization of the position of thermal intercept with respect to the flange, it has been possible to increase the temperature from 289 K to 298 K satisfying the requirement. TACB : Manufacturing Near completion CS TF ST ACB-CS ACB-TF ACB-ST CCB LHe Bath Heat Exch- anger C D Y X E Y B A Separation of External supports & EPs C D Y X X E Y B A A, B, C, D, E are EPs; X and Y are CLs Shared Supports and EPs Individual Supports and EPs Detailed study PTCL in Manufacturing phase ‘T’ section ‘Z’ section Straight section References 1. Serio L et al., The Cryogenic System For ITER, Fusion Science and Technology, Volume 56, p. 672-75 2. Chang H.-S., Serio L., Henry D., Chalifour M. and Forgeas A., Operation Mode Studies Of The ITER Cryodistribution System, Advances in Cryogenic Engineering, 2012, p. 1691-98 3. Klein J. H. and Cork R. B., An Approach to Technical Risk Assessment, International Journal of Project Management, Volume 16, No. 6, p. 345-51 4. Shah N, Bhattacharya R, Sarkar B, Badgujar S, Vaghela H and Patel P, Preliminary system design and analysis of an optimized infrastructure for ITER prototype cryoline test, Advances in Cryogenic Engineering, Volume 57, p. 1935-42 5. Shah N, Sarkar B, Choukekar K, Bhattacharya R and Kumar Uday, Investigation of Various Methods for Heat Load Measurement of ITER Prototype Cryoline, Advances in Cryogenic Engineering, Volume 58, p. 856-63 6. Vaghela H., Sarkar B., Bhattacharya R., Kapoor H., Chalifour M., Chang H.-S. and Serio L., Performance evaluation approach for the supercritical helium cold circulators of ITER, Advances in Cryogenic Engineering, 2014, p. 872-79 7. P. C. Rista, J. Shull, B. Sarkar, R. Bhattacharya and H. Vaghela, Engineering, Manufacture and Preliminary Testing of the ITER Toroidal Field (TF) Magnet Helium Cold Circulator, CEC/ICMC 2015, (C1OrC-05) Replacing CCB with individual cold compressor TACB: 3D Model ACB-TF CS Cold Comp ressor TF ST ACB-ST ACB-CS LHe Bath EPs for one group of line EPs for another group of line ITER Specifications Design of PTCL Manufacturing of PTCL Cold Test of PTCL Preliminary Design of ITER Cryolines Final Design of ITER Cryolines Manufacturing of ITER Cryolines Low Technical and Low EN and PED harmonized standards for design, fabrication and materials for the ITER CLs were followed to satisfy the requirement of CE marking as the final use of the components will be in France The views and opinions expressed herein do not necessarily reflect those of the ITER-India or ITER Organization
Transcript
Page 1: F E C D D C F E D C F E D C H F E D C H F E D C H F E D C A...Shah N, Bhattacharya R, Sarkar B, Badgujar S, Vaghela H and Patel P, Preliminary system design and analysis of an optimized

Value Engineering in System of Cryoline and Cryodistribution for ITER: In-kind Contribution from INDIA

INTRODUCTION

B. Sarkar1, N. Shah1, H. Vaghela1, R. Bhattacharya1, K. Choukekar1, P. Patel1, H. Chang2, S. Badgujar2, M. Chalifour2 1ITER-India, Institute for Plasma Research, Bhat, Gandhinagar 382428, India; 2 ITER Organization, Route de Vinon-sur-Verdon, CS 90 046, 13067 St. Paul Lez Durance Cedex, France

Presented at the Cryogenic Engineering Conference and International Cryogenic Materials Conference, 2015 June 28-July 2, Tucson, Arizona; Program I.D. number: C1PoD-08 [C30]

The ITER cryogenic system consists of three main subsystems; the Cryoplant, the

Cryo-distribution (CD), as well as the system of Cryoline (CL) and Warmlines (WL)

systems. The CD and CL systems are part of the in-kind supply from India.

The cryoplants provide the required cooling power for the clients, namely, the

superconducting magnet system, Cryo-pumps and thermal shield for the main

cryostat.

The CD system controls and manipulates the different operational scenario of ITER

and the CL system establishes the two way communication of the required flow of

cryogen as per the ITER cryogenic process with the structured network of multi (two to

eight) and single process pipe cryolines.

Basis of Risk, Analysis and its Mitigation Likelihood of

Occurrence

Impact or Consequence

Negligible (1) Marginal (2) Significant (3) Critical (4) Crisis (5)

Very Likely (5) Low (5) Medium (20) High (45) Very High (80) Very High (125)

Likely (4) Low (4) Medium (16) High (36) High (64) Very High (100)

Unlikely (3) Low (3) Medium (12) Medium (27) High (48) High (75)

Very Unlikely (2) Low (2) Low (8) Medium (18) Medium (32) High (50)

Not Credible (1) Low (1) Low (4) Low (9) Medium (16) Medium (25)

ITER Cryodistribution System

ITER Cryolines System

Specifications ITER Cryolines PTCL

OVJ Size DN 100 to DN 1000 DN 600

Number of process pipes 1 to 7 6

Length ~ 5000 m 27 m

Segments Straight, Tee, Elbow, Z Straight, Tee, Elbow, Z

Quality Classes QC 1*, QC 2 QC 1

Seismic Classes SC1 (SF)*, SC1 (S), SC2, NSC SC1 (S)

Safety Classes SIC-II*, SR, Non-SIC Non-SIC

Fluids Helium, Nitrogen Helium

Temperature levels 4.5K, 50K, 80K, 300K 4.5K, 80K, 300K

Pressure of process fluid Maximum 21 bar 21 bar (design),

max. 6.5 bar (cold test)

Major Technical specifications of ITER Cryolines and PTCL

Planning and Synchronization – Development of Prototype Cryoline (PTCL) with ITER Cryolines

The high risk zone due to the availability of ‘limited resources of industrial

partners’ and their understanding on the technical specifications was found to

have both direct and indirect cascading impact on the technical performance of

the system of CLs for ITER.

A four-step process was implemented starting from global expression of interest

with pre-qualification, PTCL design followed by fabrication and test

The technical uncertainty of the overall CL system was mitigated by selecting

particular segments in the PTCL such as ‘T,’ C-sections with different angles,

straight section and a specific out of plane ‘Z’ sections.

System optimization – Individual cold compressors over Common cold compressor

F

LHe Bath

E

EF C D D C

E

F

EF D C F E

LHe Bath

D C H F E D C H

LHe Bath

F E D C H

LHe Bath LHe Bath

F E D C A

F D CE AHCF DE

GN2

LN2

11 CTBs

of PF &

CC coils

6 CTBs

of CS

coils

9 CTBs

of TF

coils

12 CVBs of

Cryopumps

for Cryostat,

NB & Torus

3 CVBs of

magnet

structures

2 CVBs of

Thermal

Shield

CCB

ACB-ST ACB-PF ACB-CS ACB-TF ACB-CP

LHe Plant

(3 Units)

CTCB

80K Loop

(2 Units)

Legends

A: LHe Header

C: SHe Supply Header

D: 4.8 K Return Header

E: 80 K Supply Header

F: 100 K Return Header

H: 50 K Supply Header

Storage (4.5 K LHe,

300 K GHe, 80 K LN2,

300 K GN2, 80 K

Quench Tank, Gas Bag)

LN2 Plant

(2 Units)

*most stringent Conclusion

Common cold compressor configuration, requires one cold compressor of capacity ~2.1

kg/s, which calls industrial up scaling or development.

Individual cold compressors provide flexibility to operate each ACB at different

temperature level as well as reduces the maximum mass flow rate for compressor.

Maximum mass flow rate requirement is now restricted to 0.6 kg/s, 0.8 kg/s and 1.3 kg/s

for ACB-TF, CS and ST respectively.

‘Very high’ and ‘high’ risks brought down to ‘medium’ and ‘low’ level with implementation

of prototyping both in CD and CL

The PTCL design, the development of two CCPs by two industrial collaborations - a

blessing towards the further development

Above planning and actual implementation as well as value engineering has enabled

ITER-India to enter in to the industrial level of development for CL and CD system of

ITER.

Acknowledgements Authors would like to thank the colleagues from ITER-India, ITER Organization in

St. Paul Lez Durance France as well as industrial partners namely M/s INOX India

Limited (India) and their consortium partner, M/s Air Liquide Advanced

Technologies (France), M/s Linde Kryotechnik (Switzerland), M/s Barber Nichols

Inc. (USA), M/s IHI (Japan), M/s Tayyo Nippon Sanso (Japan)

Group X (Process Pipe: > 3)

Group Y (Process Pipe: 1,2 or max. 3)

Total length is ~ 5 km

Sizes: DN 100 to DN1000

Complex Routing with large number of bends at odd angles, branches

37 types of VJ lines

Spread in Tokamak building, plant bridge, and cryoplant area

Tight positional tolerances for installation

~ 70m

ITER

Cryolines

CL

inside

tokamak

building

CL inside Cryoplant

area

~ 130 m

The CD system of ITER is specifically configured for a fusion machine, meaning thereby managing of steady state heat load, dynamic heat load arising from the magnets system

as well as nuclear heating and supporting the operational scenarios.

In parallel to the conceptual design, market survey to identify the cryogenic industries that can strongly support to accomplish the CD project was started through the pre-

qualification process

Process pipes CC, CD, C, CR ~ 4.5 K

Process Pipe E, F ~ 80K

Design-1

OVJ: DN600

Q (@4.5K): 0.88 W/m

Q (@80K): 4.33 W/m

No. of segments: 4

Avg. weight: 376 kg/m

Major Requirements

OVJ < DN600

Q (@4.5K) < 1.2 W/m

Q (@80K) < 4.5 W/m

No. of segments: shall be minimized

Avg. weight: shall be minimized

Design-2

OVJ: DN600

Q (@4.5K): 0.98 W/m

Q (@80K): 3.73 W/m

No. of segments: 5

Avg. Weight: 254 kg/m

Two designs of PTCL

PTCL (mock up) Test Box A

LHe Dewar

Test Box C

Test Box B

80K Cold Box

View of ITER-India cryogenic

facility (ready for PTCL test)

C1PoD-08 [C30]

Developed taking in to account the

technical requirements of the major

components such as CCPs, valves,

heat exchangers, filters,

instrumentation, etc.

Technical risk mitigation and Value engineering:

Cold Circulating Pumps and its test

Cold Circulating Pumps (CCP) Test ACB (TACB)

First of a kind technical specification

in terms of mass flow, pressure head

and variation in input conditions (i.e. P

& T). In all modes of operation

inclusive of 110 % of mass flow, more

than 70 % efficiency required.

By optimization of the position of

thermal intercept with respect to the

flange, it has been possible to

increase the temperature from 289 K to

298 K satisfying the requirement.

TACB :

Manufacturing Near completion

CS TF ST

ACB-CS ACB-TF ACB-ST

CCB

LHe Bath

Heat

Exch-

anger

C

D

Y

XX

E

Y

B

A

C

D

Y

XX

E

Y

B

A

A, B, C, D, E

are Embedded

Plates

X and Y are

cryolines

Separation of External

supports & EPs

C

D

Y

XX

E

Y

B

A

C

D

Y

XX

E

Y

B

A

A, B, C, D, E

are Embedded

Plates

X and Y are

cryolines

A, B, C, D, E are EPs;

X and Y are CLs

Shared

Supports

and EPs

Individual

Supports

and EPs

Detailed

study

PTCL in Manufacturing phase

‘T’ section

‘Z’ section Straight

section

References 1. Serio L et al., The Cryogenic System For ITER, Fusion Science and Technology, Volume 56,

p. 672-75

2. Chang H.-S., Serio L., Henry D., Chalifour M. and Forgeas A., Operation Mode Studies Of

The ITER Cryodistribution System, Advances in Cryogenic Engineering, 2012, p. 1691-98

3. Klein J. H. and Cork R. B., An Approach to Technical Risk Assessment, International

Journal of Project Management, Volume 16, No. 6, p. 345-51

4. Shah N, Bhattacharya R, Sarkar B, Badgujar S, Vaghela H and Patel P, Preliminary system

design and analysis of an optimized infrastructure for ITER prototype cryoline test,

Advances in Cryogenic Engineering, Volume 57, p. 1935-42

5. Shah N, Sarkar B, Choukekar K, Bhattacharya R and Kumar Uday, Investigation of Various

Methods for Heat Load Measurement of ITER Prototype Cryoline, Advances in Cryogenic

Engineering, Volume 58, p. 856-63

6. Vaghela H., Sarkar B., Bhattacharya R., Kapoor H., Chalifour M., Chang H.-S. and Serio L.,

Performance evaluation approach for the supercritical helium cold circulators of ITER,

Advances in Cryogenic Engineering, 2014, p. 872-79

7. P. C. Rista, J. Shull, B. Sarkar, R. Bhattacharya and H. Vaghela, Engineering, Manufacture

and Preliminary Testing of the ITER Toroidal Field (TF) Magnet Helium Cold Circulator,

CEC/ICMC 2015, (C1OrC-05)

Replacing

CCB with

individual

cold

compressor

TACB:

3D Model

ACB-TF

CS

Cold

Comp

ressor

TF ST

ACB-STACB-CS

LHe Bath

EPs for one

group of line

EPs for

another

group

of line

ITER SpecificationsDesign,

Manufacturing of ITER Cryolines

ITER Specifications

Design of PTCL

Manufacturing of PTCL

Cold Test of PTCL

Preliminary Design of ITER Cryolines

Final Design of ITER Cryolines

Manufacturing of ITER Cryolines

High Technical and Low Schedule Risk

Low Technical and Low Schedule Risk

ITER SpecificationsDesign, Manufacturing &

Cold Testing of PTCLLow Technical and High

Schedule Risk

Design, Manufacturing of

ITER Cryolines

EN and PED harmonized standards for design,

fabrication and materials for the ITER CLs were

followed to satisfy the requirement of CE marking

as the final use of the components will be in

France

The views and opinions expressed herein do not necessarily reflect those of the ITER-India or ITER Organization

Recommended