+ All Categories
Home > Documents > Fact Sheet - Eastside Transit Corridor Phase 2€¦ · 18-co 201 ntacut contact us Lilian De...

Fact Sheet - Eastside Transit Corridor Phase 2€¦ · 18-co 201 ntacut contact us Lilian De...

Date post: 09-Jul-2020
Category:
Upload: others
View: 1 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend
4
Next stop: further east. february 2020 metro.net/eastsidephase2 eastside transit corridor phase 2 Fact Sheet
Transcript
Page 1: Fact Sheet - Eastside Transit Corridor Phase 2€¦ · 18-co 201 ntacut contact us Lilian De Loza-Gutierrez Metro Community Relations Manager One Gateway Plaza, 99-13-01 Los Angeles,

Next stop: further east.

february 2020

metro.net/eastsidephase2

eastside transit corridor phase 2Fact Sheet

Page 2: Fact Sheet - Eastside Transit Corridor Phase 2€¦ · 18-co 201 ntacut contact us Lilian De Loza-Gutierrez Metro Community Relations Manager One Gateway Plaza, 99-13-01 Los Angeles,

Overview

Metro is studying three (3) project alternatives to extend the Metro L Line (Gold) further east from its current terminus at Pomona Bl and Atlantic Bl in East Los Angeles. The goal of the proposed Eastside Transit Corridor Phase 2 Project is to improve transit access and mobility by connecting eastside communities in LA County to Metro’s regional transit system, including Commerce, East Los Angeles, Montebello, Monterey Park, Pico Rivera, Rosemead, Santa Fe Springs, South El Monte and Whittier.

In 2014, a Draft Environmental Impact Statement/Environmental Impact Report (EIS/EIR) analyzed two (2) alignment (route) options for extending the Metro L Line (Gold) further east into South El Monte – via State Route 60 (SR 60) or Whittier (via Washington Bl). Based on the technical analysis and comments received by agencies and the public, the Metro Board of Directors opted to complete additional studies to address the comments received. In May 2017, Metro staff completed a technical study for the project that resulted in the following three (3) alternatives moving into the reinitiated environmental process: 1. SR 60 Alternative2. Washington Alternative3. Combined Alternative (builds both SR 60 and Washington alternatives)

SR 60 Alternative

The SR 60 Alternative generally follows the southern edge of the SR 60 freeway from the current Metro L Line (Gold) terminus at Pomona Bl and Atlantic Bl ending at Peck Rd in South El Monte. The alignment shifts to the north side of the freeway for about 1.5 miles to avoid sensitive land uses between Greenwood Av and Paramount Bl. Proposed stations* along this route being considered include:> Garfield Station in Montebello > The Shops at Montebello Station in Montebello> Santa Anita Station in South El Monte> Peck Station in South El Monte

Washington Alternative

The Washington Alternative would travel south along Atlantic Bl in an underground segment between the current Metro L Line (Gold) terminus at Pomona Bl/Atlantic Bl and the Citadel Outlets in Commerce. The route then proceeds east along Washington Bl via aerial and at-grade (street level) configurations ending at Lambert Rd in Whittier. Proposed stations* along this route being considered include: > Redesigned Atlantic Bl Station in East Los Angeles> Atlantic Bl/Whittier Bl Station in East Los Angeles> The Citadel Station in Commerce> Greenwood Av Station in Montebello> Rosemead Bl Station in Pico Rivera > Norwalk Bl Station serving unincorporated Los Nietos,

Whittier and Santa Fe Springs> Lambert Rd Station in Whittier

Combined Alternative

The Combined Alternative is defined as the complete build-out of both the SR 60 and Washington alternatives. This alternative could also provide a connection between South El Monte and Whittier.

Initial Operating Segments

The project alternatives are not anticipated to be fully constructed in one funding cycle, therefore, Initial Operating Segments (IOS) will be evaluated to build the project in phases. Any IOS must be able to operate as a stand-alone system and include a maintenance and storage facility. This approach is similar to the phased construction of other Metro Rail projects, including:> Metro B Line (Red) (built in three segments)> Metro D Line (Purple) Extension

(under construction in three segments)> Metro E Line (Expo) (built in two segments)> Metro L Line (Gold) Foothill Extension

(under construction in four segments)

* Station locations will be evaluated thoroughly to ensure each proposed station has ridership demand, economic development opportunities, first/last mile connections, among other factors.

Page 3: Fact Sheet - Eastside Transit Corridor Phase 2€¦ · 18-co 201 ntacut contact us Lilian De Loza-Gutierrez Metro Community Relations Manager One Gateway Plaza, 99-13-01 Los Angeles,

Reinitiated Environmental Process

A reinitiated environmental process for the project will update the original Draft EIS/EIR that was released in 2014. The reinitiated draft, Supplemental/Recirculated Draft EIS/EIR, will consider the changes that have occurred in communities along the alignments since 2014 and will:> Update the project’s purpose and need, and the

project's objectives> Evaluate various design refinements on alternatives

to address comments received on the 2014 Draft EIS/EIR

> Update ridership and travel time projections> Study potential environmental impacts> Analyze grade crossings> Identify locations for maintenance and storage facilities> Develop IOS

The Supplemental/Recirculated Draft EIS/EIR will be prepared and is anticipated to be available for public review in 2021. Throughout the environmental review phase, Metro staff will continue to provide project updates to stakeholders and provide the necessary tools and resources to keep communities informed. Opportunities to provide feedback will also be scheduled at key milestones in the planning process.

Project Funding

Thanks to voter support of the Los Angeles County Traffic Improvement Plan – presented to voters as Measure M in November 2016 – Metro allocated $6 billion in funding for this project that has been programmed in two cycles (per the plan’s funding schedule): > Cycle 1 allocates $3 billion in 2029 (one alignment)> Cycle 2 allocates $3 billion in 2053 (second alignment)

The project is also identified as one of the four pillar projects and is a high priority for potential acceleration. If funding can be secured prior to the anticipated 2029 funding cycle, one of the alternatives (yet to be determined) could be built in time for the 2028 Summer Olympic and Paralympic Games.

GABRIEL R

IV

SAN G

SAN GABRIE

L RIVEE

RR

NN

RIO HON

RIO HONDDDDOO

L WHITTIER

SOUTHEL MONTESOUTH

SAN GABRIELE

Whittier Narrows

Recreation Area

ROSEMEAD EL MONTE

EASTLOS ANGELES MONTEREY PARK

MONTEBELLO

PICO RIVERRAA

SANTA FESPRINGS

COMMERCC E

1ST

3RD3RD

OLYMPIC

LORE

NANA

ATLA

NTIC

AA

ARIZ

ONA

ATLA

NTIC

ATL

C

SOTO

CESAR E CHAVEZ AVV

EAST

ERN

INDI

ANAA

EAST

ERN

POMONA FWY

GARVEY

DURFEE

SANSANTA ANITA AV

SAN

VTA

PECKCK

GARVEY

SANT

A A

NITTA

AVAVV

SLAUSON

GARF

IELD

WAWAWASHINGTON BL

PHILADELPHIAE

PENN

WASHINGTON BLBLN BBL

PICK

ERIN

GGP

WAS

HING

TON

AVGT

OLYMPIC

WWASHINGTON BLBLATLANTIC

UUSON

SLAU

MULB

WY

SAN

GAB

RIEL

RIV

ER F

WY

SAN

GAB

RIEL

RIV

ER F

WY

WHITTIER BL

WHITTIER BL

WHITTIER BL

NORWALORWALK BL

WALK

BL

WHITTIER BLER BL

W

LAMBERT

SAN GABRIEL

GABRIEL

BEVERLY

BEVERLY

BEVERLY

HADLEYEY

PARAMOUNTOUNTGR

EENW

OOD

ROS

ROSE

MEA

D BL

ROSEM

EAD B

L

RINGS RD

SANTA FE SPRINRIN

GS RGS

PA PPRA

MOU

NNTT

MONTEREY PASS RD

ARFI

ELD

OD

SAN

GABR

IEL

RIVE

R FW

Y

TYLYL

ERYL

PPPECK

DURFEE

MAR VISTATT

MON

TEBE

LEELO

SANTATT

ANAFW

Y

SANTATT ANA FWYW

ROSEMEAD

BL

5

5

5

605

605710

10

10

710

10

605

10

110

110

19

60

72

19

60

60

60

72

1010

LOS ANGELES RIV

LOS ANGELES RIVEERR

BELL

BELL

DOWNENNEY

LOS ANGELESOS S

CUDAHY

BELLGARDENS

VERNON

CC

RAM

DURF

EE

FIGU

EROAA

FIGU

EROA

HARB

OR F

WYY

EXPOSITIONONN

FIGUEROAOA

ALAM

EDA

WASHINGTON BLN BL

FWYPOMONA FWYY

WORKMAN MILL

PUENTE

VALLEY

SAN BERNARDINO FWY

TURNBULL CANYON

SLAUSON

FLORENCE

LANT

ICAT

L

EEAST

ERN

E

SLAUSON

FIRESTONE

GARFIELD

F

ULBERRY

WHITTIERMANCHESTER

FLORENCE

FLORENCE

FLORENCE

FLLOR

GARF

LAKE

WOO

D

SAN

GGAABBBRRR

IIIEEELL

RRIIVVEE

RRRFFFWW

YYWWW

ARRO

YOSECO

LLLOOONN

GGBBEE

AACCHH

FFWWYY

5

710

0

10

110

110

19

60

72

10

101

Washington Alternative

SR 60 Alternative

Station to beRelocated

Wilshire/Vermont

Vermont/Beverly

Expo/Vermont

Westlake/MacArthur Park Civic Center/

Grand Park

Pico/Aliso

Maravilla AtlanticIndiana

Soto

Pershing Square

Mariachi Plaza

East LACivic Center

Little Tokyo/Arts District7th Street/

Metro Center

Pico

LATTC/OrthoInstitute

Grand/LATTC

San Pedro St

WashingtonJefferson/USC

37th St/USC

Slauson Slauson

Vernon

Florence

103rd St/Watts Towers

FirestoneManchester

Expo Park/USC

CSULA

El Monte

Lincoln/Cypress

Union Station

Chinatown

Metro Rail Lines & Station

Metro Silver Line & Station

Metrolink & Station

Regional Connector(under construction)

At-Grade

Aerial

At-Grade/Aerial Option

Below Grade

Potential Station

Project Area Boundarywithin Study Area

19-2267 ©2019 LACMTASubject to Change

Existing

Eastside Transit Corridor Phase 2

Eastside Transit Corridor Phase 2 Eastside Transit Corridor Phase 2

Project Alternatives

Page 4: Fact Sheet - Eastside Transit Corridor Phase 2€¦ · 18-co 201 ntacut contact us Lilian De Loza-Gutierrez Metro Community Relations Manager One Gateway Plaza, 99-13-01 Los Angeles,

18-1

949m

k ©

2018

lac

mta

contact us

Lilian De Loza-GutierrezMetro Community Relations ManagerOne Gateway Plaza, 99-13-01Los Angeles, CA 90012

213.922.3012

[email protected]

metro.net/eastsidephase2

@metrolosangeles

losangelesmetro

Metro invites you to stay involved and share your feedback. 20

-179

4aa

©20

20 l

acm

ta

Project Timeline

The flow chart below highlights the project's future milestones.

Project Involvement

Metro is committed to a comprehensive outreach program that provides project stakeholders with the necessary tools and resources to be informed about the project to provide valuable input at key milestones.

Project Development Process*

Early PlanningEnvironmental Review

2018-2021Re-initiated DraftEnvironmental Studies& Advanced ConceptualEngineering

2022-2023Environmental Studies& Conceptual Engineering

2029Construction ofFirst Alternative

2035First Alternative Open for Service

2023-2028Final Design

Engineering & Design

Construction Operations & Maintenance

ongoing public participation

*This timeline is subject to change based on various factors, including funding opportunities (see Project Funding section).


Recommended