+ All Categories
Home > Documents > Factor Analysis of the Dysf1x2.pdf

Factor Analysis of the Dysf1x2.pdf

Date post: 02-Jun-2018
Category:
Upload: goes-wids-sapoetra
View: 219 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend

of 15

Transcript
  • 8/10/2019 Factor Analysis of the Dysf1x2.pdf

    1/15

    Factor Analysis of the Dysfunctional

    Behavior Rating Instrument:Preliminary Results

    D. William Molloy, MB MRCPI FRCPC

    David L. Lewis, PhD

    Martin J. ODonnell, MB MRCPITimothy I. M. Standish, MA

    David Jewell, MHAMcMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario

    Regional Geriatric Program central, Hamilton ON

    Presented at the meetings of the Canadian Associationon Gerontology, Toronto, November 1, 2003

  • 8/10/2019 Factor Analysis of the Dysf1x2.pdf

    2/15

    Background

    Behavioral and psychological symptoms of

    dementia (BPSD) are common. (1) Natural history of BPSD has been poorly

    described (2).

    Especially for community-dwelling persons

    Many instruments measure the frequency/

    severity of BPSD.(3, 4, 5, 6, 7)

    One of these is the Dysfunctional BehaviourRating Index (DBRI).

  • 8/10/2019 Factor Analysis of the Dysf1x2.pdf

    3/15

    ObjectiveTo examine BPSD in community

    dwelling patients.To classify behaviors into distinct,

    clinically meaningful domains.To determine the frequency of

    common behaviors amongcommunity-dwelling older adults withcognitive impairment/ dementia.

  • 8/10/2019 Factor Analysis of the Dysf1x2.pdf

    4/15

    Method

    Descriptive study

    Community-dwelling elderly withcaregivers

    Presented at a memory clinic in

    Hamilton, 1989 - 2000

    Referral from primary care or

    internal medicineData collection by electronic charting

  • 8/10/2019 Factor Analysis of the Dysf1x2.pdf

    5/15

    Data used in this study:

    Patient

    Agegender

    duration of condition

    Standardized Mini-Mental Status Exam,MMSE

    DysfunctionalBehaviour RatingInstrument, DBRI

    Caregiver:

    agegender

    relationship topatient

    hours spent

    caregiving

  • 8/10/2019 Factor Analysis of the Dysf1x2.pdf

    6/15

    Analysis

    Data were collected by nursing and medicalstaff at first visit and entered directly into anelectronic relational database (GeriatricAssessment Tool)

    Then exported into SPSS 11.0 for analysis

    Analysis was by Principle Components (factor)analysis with Varimax rotation and Kaisernormalization

    Validated by correlations with Zarit BurdenIndex (not shown)

  • 8/10/2019 Factor Analysis of the Dysf1x2.pdf

    7/15

    The DBRI

    25 close-ended questions

    (+ 3 open-ended, not included) Completed by caregiver

    Asks about frequency (never greater

    than 5 times a day) Asks about problem (not a problem

    great deal of a problem)

    21 behaviours reviewed: repeats stories,repeats questions, angry, withdrawn,tearful, aggressive, etc.

  • 8/10/2019 Factor Analysis of the Dysf1x2.pdf

    8/15

    Results (I)Table 1: Patient Demographics at Presentation

    No Caregiver 71.7

    Caregiver 73.4

    No Caregiver 68.2

    Caregiver 70.1

    No Caregiver 42.5

    Caregiver 44.6

    No Caregiver 21.4

    Caregiver 20.3

    No Caregiver 3.2

    Caregiver 3.2

    No Caregiver --

    Caregiver 65.9

    No Caregiver N= 464; Caregiver N=921

    Mean Duration of

    Disease

    % Secondary

    Education Diploma

    Mean Age

    Mean Age at Onset

    % Male

    Mean SMMSE

  • 8/10/2019 Factor Analysis of the Dysf1x2.pdf

    9/15

    Results (II)

    Mean Age 60.4% Male 34.3

    Pt Lives With CG (%) 65.2

    % Spouse of Pt 56.3

    Mean Weekly Hours Caregiving 85.1

    Table 2: Caregiver Demographics at Presentation

  • 8/10/2019 Factor Analysis of the Dysf1x2.pdf

    10/15

    Results (III)

    Factor analysis yielded 5 components

    AngerAgitation

    Delusional behaviorsSuspicion

    Repetitive behaviors

  • 8/10/2019 Factor Analysis of the Dysf1x2.pdf

    11/15

    %Angry 65

    Demanding 39

    Aggressive 32Temper Outbursts 47

    Embarrassing Behaviour 24

    Refused to Cooperate 35

    Withdrawn 46

    Agitated 43

    Crying 39

    Frustrated 75

    Wandering 28Up at Night 54A

    gitation

    An

    ger

    Prevalence of Behaviors (I)Prevalence of Behaviors (I)

  • 8/10/2019 Factor Analysis of the Dysf1x2.pdf

    12/15

    Prevalence of Behaviors (II)Prevalence of Behaviors (II)Repeats Questions 82

    Repeats Stories 70

    Spouse not Spouse 11Home not Home 15

    People in House 21

    Sees Things not There 19Hears Things not There 19

    People Stealing Things 23

    Hides Things 33

    Suspicious 44

    Wants to Leave 26

    Keeps Changing Mind 42

    Afraid to be Left Alone 35Misce

    ll-

    aneous

    Susp

    ic-

    ions

    Delu

    sions

    Repe

    tition

  • 8/10/2019 Factor Analysis of the Dysf1x2.pdf

    13/15

    Goodness of FitGoodness of Fit

    Anger 15.5

    Agitation 12.7Repetition 11.9

    Delusions 11.3

    Suspicions 7.2

    Total 58.6

    Table 4: Eigenvalues of Factors

  • 8/10/2019 Factor Analysis of the Dysf1x2.pdf

    14/15

    Reliability and ValidityReliability and Validity

    Intraclass correlation coefficient: 0.75

    Zarit scores (not shown)Correlate strongly with anger and

    agitation

    Correlate moderately withrepetition.

    Patient traits (age, gender,education) not useful explanatoryvariables.

  • 8/10/2019 Factor Analysis of the Dysf1x2.pdf

    15/15

    Discussion:

    BPSD clusters into distinct domains,

    allowing treatment focus. The elements of BPSD most strongly

    associated with caregiver burden are

    anger and agitation BPSD as indicated by the DBRI is the best

    predictor of burden.


Recommended