+ All Categories
Home > Documents > Factors affec,ng the sign, magnitude, and generality of collateral … -sentre og fagråd/K-… ·...

Factors affec,ng the sign, magnitude, and generality of collateral … -sentre og fagråd/K-… ·...

Date post: 25-Oct-2020
Category:
Upload: others
View: 0 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend
1
Figure 3. Varia,on in rela,ve suscep,bility changes may be explained by the selected AMR rather than gene,c varia,on between mutants. A tri-plot of a redundancy analysis represen3ng 66.2% of the varia3on of IC90 changes shows clustering of the AMR mutants (open circles), near the popula3on average (large filled circle), based on their selected AMR (colors). An3microbial abbrevia3ons (black text) are placed at the 3p of vectors passing through the origin, that point in the direc3on of increasing MIC change rela3ve to the WT. Ciprofloxacin resistant mutants (pink circles) cluster at higher values of several an3microbial vectors, including TMC and CHL, indica3ng CR to those drugs. Mecillinam mutants (green circles) have dis3nct clustering towards low values of some an3microbial vectors, including SXT and AZM, showing CS to those. Figure 2. Collateral suscep,bility changes correlate with changes in the MPC. Below is a comparison of the average IC90 (lower-limit) and MPC (upper limit) values for representa3ve strain-drug combina3ons where conserved CR 50 (red bars) and CS 50 (blue bars) trends were found. These results are compared to the WT (black bars). In the majority of cases collateral changes in the MPC and IC90 correlated well, with few excep3ons. These findings suggest that small changes in an3microbial suscep3bility can affect the muta3on selec3on window and thus the evolu3onary trajectory of single AMR mutants toward mul3drug resistance. Nicole L. Podnecky 1* , Elizabeth G.A. Fredheim 1 , Julia M. Kloos 1 , Ane L.G. Utnes 1 , Raul Primicerio 1 , Ørjan Samuelsen 1,2 and Pål J. Johnsen 1* Factors affec,ng the sign, magnitude, and generality of collateral suscep,bility networks in clinical Escherichia coli strains. INTRODUCTION § An,microbial Resistance (AMR) From an evolu3onary perspec3ve, the emergence of AMR is an inevitable outcome due to our use and high consump3on of an3microbials. Development of new an3microbials, improved an3microbial stewardship, and novel approaches to reduce AMR emergence and spread are essen3al to maintain effec3ve treatments. § Cross-Resistance (CR) and Collateral Sensi,vity (CS) AMR to one drug can cause CR to others, oben of the same class and with similar drug target(s), or to drugs of diverse classes due to general AMR mechanisms such as efflux. However, AMR can result in CS, where an AMR strain is more suscep3ble to other an3microbials [1]. Previous studies suggest that treatment strategies based on CS profiles, specifically using mutually-exclusive AMR traits [1] or drug cycling regimens [1,2], could be beneficial. § Knowledge Gaps While CS is described in some clinical isolates [2], it is unclear how robust CS/CR networks are across large collec3ons of clinical isolates and isolates with different resistance determinants. Addi3onally, the contribu3on of AMR mechanism to CS networks is not well-described. § Approaches We generated AMR to common an3microbials for treatment of urinary tract infec3ons in pan-suscep3ble clinical Escherichia coli isolates. The resul3ng collateral networks were compared to assess the generality within AMR groups. Whole genome sequencing was used to iden3fy the AMR muta3ons and to inves3gate correla3ons between CS and resistance mechanisms. 1 Microbial Pharmacology and Popula3on Biology Research Group, Dept. of Pharmacy, UiT – The Arc3c University of Norway, Tromsø, Norway 2 Norwegian Na3onal Advisory Unit on Detec3on of An3microbial Resistance, Dept. of Microbiology and Infec3on Control, University Hospital of North Norway, Tromsø, Norway MATERIALS AND METHODS § Selec,on for muta,ons conferring clinical resistance 10 pan-suscep3ble E. coli isolates from urinary tract infec3ons, represen3ng different MLST sequence types (ECOSENS collec3on [3]) were selected on MH II or LB agar with mecillinam (MEC), ciprofloxacin (CIP), nitrofurantoin (NIT), or trimethoprim (TMP) to achieve AMR above clinical breakpoints (www.eucast.org ). § Determina,on of CS/CR networks The concentra3on inhibi3ng ≥ 90% of growth (IC90 [2]) was determined for 16 an3microbials in MH II broth using a 2-fold dilu3on series with half steps. Fold changes in IC90 for all 10 AMR mutants to their respec3ve WT were calculated. A redundancy analysis of the data was performed to the CS/CR network. This analysis was done in R [5] using the Vegan work package [6]. § Assessing changes in the Muta,on Preven,on Concentra,on (MPC) MPCs were determined for drugs displaying CS 50 or CR 50 , with the excep3on of temocillin. One mutant-WT pair was tested per drug, and for each concentra3on tested, > 10 10 CFUs were spread onto four large MHII agar plates. Drug concentra3ons increased in a 2-fold dilu3on series, pin-poin3ng the lowest drug concentra3on that inhibits growth of single step mutants in a large popula3on aber 48 hours. § Iden,fica,on of AMR mechanism(s) conferring CS changes DNA was isolated using the GenElute Bacterial Genomic DNA Kit (Sigma-Aldrich). Paired-end libraries were prepared using the TruSeq DNA Sample prepara3on kit (Illumina, USA). Libraries were sequenced to a read length of 300 bp on a Hi-Seq. The DNASTAR SeqMan NGen sobware (Madison, WI) was used to analyze Illumina data, using standard sesngs, to each isolate’s WT parental strain. RDA 2 (30.05%) * Contact Informa3on [email protected] [email protected] P 0230 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS We thank Dr. Adam Roberts and the University College of London Sequencing Facility for library prepara3on and DNA sequencing. This work was supported by grants from the Northern Norway Regional Health Authority, UiT The Arc,c University of Norway, and JPI-EC-AMR. Table 2. AMR mechanism likely contributes to varia,on in CS/CR pa]erns. Ciprofloxacin resistant mutants show the greatest variety of AMR mechanisms and ini3al comparisons suggest that AMR mechanism plays a cri3cal role in CS/ CR paverns. The IC90 fold changes of the CIP resistant mutants compared to their cognate WT strains are shown in the heat map below, where CS (blue boxes) and CR (red boxes) changes appear to vary by AMR mechanism. Isolates are ordered by AMR muta3on, from drug target muta3ons alone to combina3ons of efflux pumps and mul3ple efflux pump regulator muta3ons. CR was frequent in isolates with efflux-related muta3ons and was greatest in those with muta3ons to mul3ple regulators of the AcrAB-TolC efflux pump. REFERENCES 1. Szybalski, W. and V. Bryson (1952) Gene3c studies on microbial cross resistance to toxic agents. I. Cross resistance of Escherichia coli to fibeen an3bio3cs. J Bacteriol. 64(4): p. 489-99. 2. Imamovic, L. and M.O. Sommer (2013) Use of collateral sensi3vity networks to design drug cycling protocols that avoid resistance development. Sci Transl Med. 5(204): p. 204ra132. 3. Bengtsson, S., et al. (2012) Sequence types and plasmid carriage of uropathogenic Escherichia coli devoid of phenotypically detectable resistance. J An3microb Chemother. 67(1): p. 69-73. 4. R Core Team (2013) R: A Language and Environment for Sta3s3cal Compu3ng. R Founda3on for Sta3s3cal Compu3ng, Vienna, Austria. ISBN 3-900051-07-0. hvp://www.R-project.org/ . 5. Dixon, P. (2003) VEGAN, a package of R func3ons for community ecology. J of VegetaAon Sci. 14(6): p. 927-930. 256 128 64 32 16 8 4 2 1 0.5 0.25 0.125 0.063 0.031 0.016 0.008 Antimicrobial Concentration (µg/mL) CIP MEC NIT AMX AZT CAZ CHL COL FOS GEN MEC TMP SXT AZT GEN TMP AMX AZT CIP AMR Mechanism CIP MEC NIT TMP Drug Target Modifica3on 10 (1) 6 Overproduc3on 6 Reduced Drug Ac3va3on Nitroreductase disrup3on 10 Reduced Drug Uptake Porin muta3on 2 Regula3on of Efflux AcrAB-TolC 7 1 MdtK 9 1 mdfA 1 EmrAB-TolC 7 ABC transport 1 ppGpp synthesis (ac3va3on of stringent response) Strigent response 4 tRNA synthesis 4 tRNA processing 1 Cellular metabolism 3 Table 2. Iden,fica,on of puta,ve AMR mechanisms. Whole genome sequencing iden3fied puta3ve resistance mechanisms in all 40 AMR mutants. All CIP mutants had muta3on(s) in gyrA but only 1 strain also had a muta3on in the second drug target, parC. The remaining 9 CIP mutants had one or more muta3ons to genes known to effect expression of either the AcrAB-TolC or Mdtk-mediated efflux pumps. MEC mutants had muta3ons in a number of genes, some previously unreported, that likely affect the ac3va3on of the stringent response. All NIT mutants had inac3va3on of at least one of two oxygen-insensi3ve nitroreductases, and the majority had muta3ons to regula3on of the EmrAB-TolC efflux pump. Finally TMP resistant isolates all had either modifica3on of FolA or muta3ons in the promoter regions of FolA likely leading to overexpression, one isolate had genomic amplifica3on of a large region including the folA gene. Figure 1. Pervasive collateral suscep,bility changes in resistant mutants. The frequency of CS (blue bars) and CR (red bars) changes in IC90 are summarized for each set of 10 AMR mutants. General trends were iden3fied using CR 50 and CS 50 cutoffs, where 50% or more of an AMR group (5 of 10 mutants) displayed CR or CS, respec3vely, to a given drug. Ciprofloxacin resistant mutants displayed the majority of conserved collateral suscep3bility changes. -10 -5 0 5 10 AMX AZT CAZ CHL CIP COL SXT ETP FOS GEN MEC NIT TMPTEM TET TGC Ciprofloxacin mutants -10 -5 0 5 10 AMX AZT CAZ CHL CIP COL SXT ETP FOS GEN MEC NIT TMP TEM TET TGC Mecillinam mutants -10 -5 0 5 10 AMX AZT CAZ CHL CIP COL SXT ETP FOS GEN MEC NIT TMP TEM TET TGC Nitrofurantoin mutants -10 -5 0 5 10 AMX AZT CAZ CHL CIP COL SXT ETP FOS GEN MEC NIT TMP TEM TET TGC Trimethoprim mutants RDA 1 (36.15%) MLST Origin CIP resistance mechanism GEN CHL ETP CAZ AMX TEM MEC TMP SXT FOS AZT NIT COL CIP TGC TET ST 73 Greece GyrA and ParC Muta3ons ST 12 Greece GyrA MdtK Efflux ST 420 Greece ST 100 Greece GyrA, MdtK AcrAB-TolC Efflux (soxR) ST 127 Portugal GyrA, MdtK AcrAB-TolC (marR) ST 550 Sweden ST 104 Portugal ST 69 UK ST 95 Sweden GyrA, MdtK AcrAB-TolC (marR, acrR) ST 1235 UK Fold Change In IC90 -4 -2 - 1.5 1 1.5 2 4 8 16 32 CONCLUSIONS § Collateral changes in suscep,bility were found in 47% of cases Ciprofloxacin resistance greatly alters the suscep3bility to many diverse an3microbials, and CR is more frequent than CS. Ertapenem, fosfomycin and gentamicin suscep3bili3es were largely maintained or increased across all AMR groups. Collateral changes in an3microbial suscep3bly affect the span of the muta3on selec3on window. § Collateral changes in suscep,bility are dependent on the gene,c mechanism of resistance ¨ Collateral effects appear independent of the gene3c background but instead are likely related the AMR mechanism. ¨ CR is frequent in isolates with increased efflux expression. -3 -2 -1 0 1 -1.5 -1.0 -0.5 0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 Ciprofloxacin Mecillinam Nitrofurantoin Trimethoprim AMX AZM CAZ CHL COL SXT ETP FOS GEN TEM TET TGC
Transcript
Page 1: Factors affec,ng the sign, magnitude, and generality of collateral … -sentre og fagråd/K-… · 10 pan-suscep3ble E. coli isolates from urinary tract infec3ons, represen3ng different

Figure3.Varia,oninrela,vesuscep,bilitychangesmaybeexplainedbytheselectedAMRratherthangene,cvaria,onbetweenmutants.Atri-plotofaredundancyanalysis represen3ng66.2%of thevaria3onof IC90 changes showsclusteringoftheAMRmutants(opencircles),nearthepopula3onaverage(largefilled circle), basedon their selectedAMR (colors). An3microbial abbrevia3ons(blacktext)areplacedatthe3pofvectorspassingthroughtheorigin,thatpointin the direc3on of increasing MIC change rela3ve to the WT. Ciprofloxacinresistantmutants (pink circles) cluster at higher values of several an3microbialvectors, including TMC and CHL, indica3ng CR to those drugs. Mecillinammutants (green circles) have dis3nct clustering towards low values of somean3microbialvectors,includingSXTandAZM,showingCStothose.

Figure 2. Collateral suscep,bility changes correlate with changes in the MPC.BelowisacomparisonoftheaverageIC90(lower-limit)andMPC(upperlimit)valuesfor representa3ve strain-drug combina3ons where conserved CR50 (red bars) andCS50(bluebars) trendswere found. These results are compared to theWT (blackbars). In themajority of cases collateral changes in theMPC and IC90 correlatedwell,withfewexcep3ons.Thesefindingssuggestthatsmallchangesinan3microbialsuscep3bility can affect themuta3on selec3onwindow and thus the evolu3onarytrajectoryofsingleAMRmutantstowardmul3drugresistance.

NicoleL.Podnecky1*,ElizabethG.A.Fredheim1,JuliaM.Kloos1,AneL.G.Utnes1,RaulPrimicerio1,ØrjanSamuelsen1,2andPålJ.Johnsen1*

Factorsaffec,ngthesign,magnitude,andgeneralityofcollateralsuscep,bilitynetworksinclinicalEscherichiacolistrains.

INTRODUCTION§  An,microbialResistance(AMR)

From an evolu3onary perspec3ve, the emergence of AMR is an inevitableoutcomeduetoouruseandhighconsump3onofan3microbials.Developmentofnewan3microbials,improvedan3microbialstewardship,andnovelapproachestoreduceAMRemergenceandspreadareessen3altomaintaineffec3vetreatments.

§  Cross-Resistance(CR)andCollateralSensi,vity(CS)AMRtoonedrugcancauseCRtoothers,obenofthesameclassandwithsimilardrugtarget(s),ortodrugsofdiverseclassesduetogeneralAMRmechanismssuchasefflux.However,AMRcanresultinCS,whereanAMRstrainismoresuscep3bleto other an3microbials [1]. Previous studies suggest that treatment strategiesbasedonCSprofiles, specificallyusingmutually-exclusiveAMR traits [1]ordrugcyclingregimens[1,2],couldbebeneficial.

§  KnowledgeGapsWhileCS isdescribed insomeclinical isolates[2], it isunclearhowrobustCS/CRnetworksareacrosslargecollec3onsofclinicalisolatesandisolateswithdifferentresistancedeterminants.Addi3onally, thecontribu3onofAMRmechanismtoCSnetworksisnotwell-described.

§  ApproachesWe generated AMR to common an3microbials for treatment of urinary tractinfec3ons in pan-suscep3ble clinical Escherichia coli isolates. The resul3ngcollateral networkswere compared to assess the generalitywithinAMRgroups.Whole genome sequencing was used to iden3fy the AMR muta3ons and toinves3gatecorrela3onsbetweenCSandresistancemechanisms.

1MicrobialPharmacologyandPopula3onBiologyResearchGroup,Dept.ofPharmacy,UiT–TheArc3cUniversityofNorway,Tromsø,Norway2NorwegianNa3onalAdvisoryUnitonDetec3onofAn3microbialResistance,Dept.ofMicrobiologyandInfec3onControl,UniversityHospitalofNorthNorway,Tromsø,Norway

MATERIALSANDMETHODS§  Selec,onformuta,onsconferringclinicalresistance

10 pan-suscep3ble E. coli isolates from urinary tract infec3ons, represen3ngdifferentMLSTsequencetypes(ECOSENScollec3on[3])wereselectedonMHIIorLB agar with mecillinam (MEC), ciprofloxacin (CIP), nitrofurantoin (NIT), ortrimethoprim(TMP)toachieveAMRaboveclinicalbreakpoints(www.eucast.org).

§  Determina,onofCS/CRnetworks

The concentra3on inhibi3ng ≥ 90%of growth (IC90 [2])was determined for 16an3microbials inMH II broth using a 2-fold dilu3on serieswith half steps. FoldchangesinIC90forall10AMRmutantstotheirrespec3veWTwerecalculated.Aredundancy analysis of the data was performed to the CS/CR network. ThisanalysiswasdoneinR[5]usingtheVeganworkpackage[6].

§  AssessingchangesintheMuta,onPreven,onConcentra,on(MPC)MPCswere determined for drugs displaying CS50 or CR50,with the excep3onoftemocillin.Onemutant-WTpairwastestedperdrug,andforeachconcentra3ontested, >1010 CFUs were spread onto four large MHII agar plates. Drugconcentra3ons increased ina2-folddilu3onseries,pin-poin3ngthe lowestdrugconcentra3on that inhibits growth of single stepmutants in a large popula3onaber48hours.

§  Iden,fica,onofAMRmechanism(s)conferringCSchangesDNAwasisolatedusingtheGenEluteBacterialGenomicDNAKit(Sigma-Aldrich).Paired-endlibrarieswerepreparedusingtheTruSeqDNASampleprepara3onkit(Illumina,USA).Librariesweresequencedtoareadlengthof300bponaHi-Seq.TheDNASTARSeqManNGensobware(Madison,WI)wasusedtoanalyzeIlluminadata,usingstandardsesngs,toeachisolate’sWTparentalstrain.

RDA2

(30.05%)

1

*[email protected]@uit.no

P0230

ACKNOWLEDGMENTSWethankDr.AdamRobertsandtheUniversityCollegeofLondonSequencingFacilityforlibraryprepara3onandDNAsequencing.

ThisworkwassupportedbygrantsfromtheNorthernNorwayRegionalHealthAuthority,UiTTheArc,cUniversityofNorway,andJPI-EC-AMR.

Table 2.AMRmechanism likely contributes to varia,on in CS/CRpa]erns.CiprofloxacinresistantmutantsshowthegreatestvarietyofAMRmechanismsandini3alcomparisonssuggestthatAMRmechanismplaysacri3calroleinCS/CRpaverns. TheIC90foldchangesoftheCIPresistantmutantscomparedtotheir cognateWT strains are shown in the heatmapbelow,where CS (blueboxes) and CR (red boxes) changes appear to vary by AMR mechanism.Isolates areorderedbyAMRmuta3on, fromdrug targetmuta3onsalone tocombina3onsofeffluxpumpsandmul3pleeffluxpumpregulatormuta3ons.CRwasfrequentinisolateswithefflux-relatedmuta3onsandwasgreatestinthosewithmuta3onstomul3pleregulatorsoftheAcrAB-TolCeffluxpump.

REFERENCES

1.Szybalski,W.andV.Bryson(1952)Gene3cstudiesonmicrobialcrossresistancetotoxicagents.I.CrossresistanceofEscherichiacolitofibeenan3bio3cs.JBacteriol.64(4):p.489-99.

2.Imamovic,L.andM.O.Sommer(2013)Useofcollateralsensi3vitynetworkstodesigndrugcyclingprotocolsthatavoidresistancedevelopment.SciTranslMed.5(204):p.204ra132.

3.Bengtsson,S.,etal.(2012)SequencetypesandplasmidcarriageofuropathogenicEscherichiacolidevoidofphenotypicallydetectableresistance.JAn3microbChemother.67(1):p.69-73.

4.RCoreTeam(2013)R:ALanguageandEnvironmentforSta3s3calCompu3ng.RFounda3onforSta3s3calCompu3ng,Vienna,Austria.ISBN3-900051-07-0.hvp://www.R-project.org/.

5.Dixon,P.(2003)VEGAN,apackageofRfunc3onsforcommunityecology.JofVegetaAonSci.14(6):p.927-930.

25612864321684210.50.250.1250.0630.0310.0160.008

Ant

imic

robi

al C

once

ntra

tion

(µg/

mL)

CIP MEC NIT

AMX AZT CAZ CHL COL FOS GEN MEC TMP SXT AZT GEN TMP AMX AZT CIP

AMRMechanism CIP MEC NIT TMP

DrugTargetModifica3on 10(1) – – 6Overproduc3on – – – 6

ReducedDrugAc3va3onNitroreductasedisrup3on – – 10 –

ReducedDrugUptake Porinmuta3on 2 – – –

Regula3onofEfflux

AcrAB-TolC 7 – 1 –MdtK 9 – 1 –mdfA – – 1 –EmrAB-TolC – – 7 –ABCtransport – 1 – –

ppGppsynthesis(ac3va3onofstringentresponse)

Strigentresponse – 4 – –tRNAsynthesis – 4 – –tRNAprocessing – 1 – –Cellularmetabolism – 3 – –

Table 2. Iden,fica,on of puta,ve AMR mechanisms. Whole genomesequencing iden3fied puta3ve resistance mechanisms in all 40 AMRmutants.AllCIPmutantshadmuta3on(s)ingyrAbutonly1strainalsohadamuta3onintheseconddrugtarget,parC.Theremaining9CIPmutantshadone ormoremuta3ons to genes known to effect expression of either theAcrAB-TolCorMdtk-mediatedeffluxpumps.MECmutantshadmuta3onsina number of genes, some previously unreported, that likely affect theac3va3onofthestringentresponse. AllNITmutantshad inac3va3onofatleast one of two oxygen-insensi3ve nitroreductases, and themajority hadmuta3ons to regula3on of the EmrAB-TolC efflux pump. Finally TMPresistant isolates all had either modifica3on of FolA or muta3ons in thepromoter regions of FolA likely leading to overexpression, one isolate hadgenomicamplifica3onofalargeregionincludingthefolAgene.

Figure1.Pervasivecollateralsuscep,bilitychangesinresistantmutants.ThefrequencyofCS(bluebars)andCR(redbars)changesinIC90aresummarizedforeachsetof10AMRmutants.Generaltrendswereiden3fiedusingCR50andCS50cutoffs,where50%ormoreofanAMRgroup(5of10mutants)displayedCRorCS,respec3vely,toagivendrug.Ciprofloxacinresistantmutantsdisplayedthemajorityofconservedcollateralsuscep3bilitychanges.

-10

-5

0

5

10AMXAZT CAZ CHL CIP COL SXT ETP FOSGENMECNITTMPTEMTET TGC

Ciprofloxacinmutants

-10

-5

0

5

10AMXAZT CAZ CHL CIP COL SXT ETP FOSGENMECNIT TMPTEMTET TGC

Mecillinammutants

-10

-5

0

5

10AMXAZT CAZ CHL CIP COL SXT ETP FOSGENMECNIT TMPTEMTET TGC

Nitrofurantoinmutants

-10

-5

0

5

10AMXAZT CAZ CHL CIP COL SXT ETP FOSGENMECNIT TMPTEMTET TGC

Trimethoprimmutants

RDA1(36.15%)

MLST Origin CIPresistancemechanism

GEN CHL ETP CAZ AMXTEMMECTMP SXT FOS AZT NIT COL CIP TGC TET

ST73 Greece GyrAandParCMuta3ons 0,31 0,84 0,75 0,82 0,79 1,05 0,91 1,67 1,33 0,92 0,66 0,92 0,86 1117,09 1,13 0,92

ST12 Greece GyrAMdtKEfflux

0,25 1,67 0,67 1,53 1,67 7,47 2,37 2,44 1,10 0,55 0,80 0,30 0,53 128,00 0,63 0,50

ST420 Greece 0,29 8,00 1,00 4,00 1,56 9,00 2,20 9,33 3,67 0,67 3,50 1,22 0,75 149,33 3,20 3,56

ST100 Greece GyrA,MdtKAcrAB-TolCEfflux(soxR)

0,34 2,56 1,29 3,64 1,25 5,82 5,93 6,79 4,57 0,43 2,00 0,61 4,44 250,00 0,80 1,02

ST127 Portugal

GyrA,MdtKAcrAB-TolC(marR)

0,49 2,78 0,44 1,90 1,10 4,00 0,42 1,38 1,11 0,50 1,44 1,50 0,79 321,43 1,23 1,33

ST550 Sweden 0,50 6,00 0,39 1,09 1,00 2,00 0,88 7,33 2,67 0,43 3,20 0,91 2,86 400,00 1,25 0,90

ST104 Portugal 0,35 4,00 0,78 1,50 1,33 6,67 5,20 1,13 0,90 2,00 0,17 0,52 1,04 80,00 0,72 0,68

ST69 UK 0,28 2,21 0,67 2,00 1,56 6,86 1,83 1,38 1,50 0,28 0,31 0,78 0,58 145,83 0,25 0,42

ST95 Sweden GyrA,MdtKAcrAB-TolC(marR,acrR)

2,18 2,86 1,57 7,33 4,44 10,67 29,63 3,60 3,11 1,67 1,94 0,90 0,69 279,27 1,36 2,15

ST1235 UK 1,29 22,59 4,57 11,43 9,43 13,71 27,43 3,00 3,27 0,74 10,18 3,00 0,73 400,00 9,14 9,33

FoldChangeInIC90

0,23 0,49 0,74 1 1,6 2,2 4 8,2 16,2 33

-4 -2 -1.5 1 1.5 2 4 8 16 32

CONCLUSIONS

§ Collateralchangesinsuscep,bilitywerefoundin47%ofcases□  Ciprofloxacinresistancegreatlyaltersthesuscep3bilitytomanydiversean3microbials,andCRismorefrequentthanCS.

□  Ertapenem,fosfomycinandgentamicinsuscep3bili3eswerelargelymaintainedorincreasedacrossallAMRgroups.

□  Collateralchangesinan3microbialsuscep3blyaffectthespanofthemuta3onselec3onwindow.

§ Collateralchangesinsuscep,bilityaredependentonthegene,cmechanismofresistance

¨  Collateraleffectsappearindependentofthegene3cbackgroundbutinsteadarelikelyrelatedtheAMRmechanism.

¨  CRisfrequentinisolateswithincreasedeffluxexpression.-3 -2 -1 0 1

-1.5

-1.0

-0.5

0.0

0.5

1.0

1.5

2.0

Multivariate Redundancy Analysis of Fold Change by Resistance Group

RDA1 (36.15%)

RD

A2

(30.

05%

)

Ciprofloxacin

Mecillinam

Nitrofurantoin

Trimethoprim

AMX

AZM

CAZCHLCOL

SXT

ETP

FOS

GEN

TEM

TET

TGC

Recommended