+ All Categories
Home > Education > Faculty Roles, Responsibilities, and LoadFaculty Development Model - Competency-Based Education

Faculty Roles, Responsibilities, and LoadFaculty Development Model - Competency-Based Education

Date post: 18-Feb-2017
Category:
Upload: becky-lopanec
View: 71 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend
53
Faculty Role, Responsibili2es and Load Mary Kohls, Aus.n Community College Steve Gance, WA State Board for Community and Technical Colleges Nancy Thibeault, Sinclair Community College Thursday, June 4, 2015
Transcript

Faculty  Role,  Responsibili2es  and  Load

Mary  Kohls,  Aus.n  Community  College  Steve  Gance,  WA  State  Board  for  Community  and  Technical  Colleges  Nancy  Thibeault,  Sinclair  Community  College    

Thursday,  June  4,  2015    

CBE4CC

Agenda

1.  Ins.tu.onal  Overview  2.  Faculty  Buy-­‐In  3.  Faculty  Role  4.  Faculty  /  Coach  Collabora.on  5.  Policies  6.  Payload  

Overview  of  WA  State  Board  for  Community  and  Technical  Colleges

CBE4CC

Overview  SBCTC • WA  State  Community  and  Technical  Colleges  (CTC’s)  •  34  Colleges  •  Operate  as  a  system  coordinated  through  State  Board  for  Community  and  Technical  Colleges  (SBCTC)  

•  180,000  student  FTE’s  annually  •  SBCTC  Educa.on  Division  •  Coordinates  service  to  the  CTC’s  in  all  maYers  related  to  instruc.on  and  student  services.  

•  Helps  CTC’s  meet  the  workforce  training  needs  of  business  and  industry.  

•  Provides  research  and  analysis  to  support  statewide  policy  development  for  CTC’s.  

CBE4CC

Overview  eLearning  &  Open  Ed

•  SBCTC  eLearning  and  Open  Educa.on  Department  •  Supports  system-­‐wide  eLearning  tools  and  educa.on  technology  ini.a.ves.  

•  Provides  professional  development  opportuni.es  related  to  statewide  educa.on  technology.  

•  Manages  eLearning  and  open  educa.on  grants  and  faculty  learning  communi.es.  

•  Provides  services,  consulta.on  and  strategic  guidance  to  colleges  on  eLearning  and  open  educa.on  ini.a.ves  and  technology.  

CBE4CC

Overview  CBE  Business  Transfer  Degree •  Columbia  Basin  College  (lead  college)  •  Eight  Pilot  Colleges  (incl.  CBC):  Bellevue,  Centralia,  EvereY,  Olympic,  Pierce  College-­‐Ft.  Steilacoom  &  Puyallup,  Tacoma  

CBE4CC

Overview  CBE  Business  Transfer  Degree   • Western  Governors  University  supported  several  WA  colleges  in  developing  CBE  cer.ficate  programs:  Bellevue,  Columbia  Basin,  Edmonds,  Spokane  Falls  • Goal:  18-­‐course  Business  Transfer  degree  •  Competency-­‐based  •  Completely  online  •  Self-­‐paced  •  Content  is  openly-­‐licensed  (OER)  •  Six-­‐month  term  •  Mul.ple  start  dates  •  Available  July  1,  2015  

CBE4CC

Overview  -­‐  Sinclair

• Location: Dayton, OH •  Urban institution •  Transitional economy

• Enrollment •  College: 22,000 per semester •  Online: 7,000 / semester

• Centralized oversight of online learning •  Instructional Design •  Media development •  Faculty training •  Online student support

CBE4CC

Overview  -­‐  Sinclair

• Developed and implemented CBE Model framework •  Workforce relationships •  Program/Course Development •  Program Delivery •  Student Support

• Course-based CBE • CBE Programs •  3 AAS degrees •  4 embedded certificates •  5 Industry certifications

Overview  Aus2n  Community  College  

District •  Loca.on:      Aus.n,  Texas  •  11  Campuses-­‐-­‐-­‐  One  College  •  Offers  Associates  Degrees    in    Career/technical    Fields  or  leading  to  

a  Bachelor’s  degree  •  Cer.ficates  in  Career/Technical  Fields  •  Adult  Educa.on  and  CE    •  44,000  students  per  semester  

 

     

 Aus2n  Community  College Online  Courses:      •  12,695  enrollments  :    8.47  %  increase  over  5  

years  •  On-­‐line  faculty  hired  and  scheduled  by  the  

department  •  Course  content  and  design  evaluated  by  the  

department  •  Distance  Learning  Office-­‐-­‐-­‐Support  Role  •  Implemen.ng  tools  to  evaluate  the  on-­‐line  

courses—Quality  MaYers  •  Faculty  and  Staff  Development  office—Faculty  

Training    

 Aus2n  Community  College Competency  Based  Educa.on  (CBE)  •  Seeded  by  Department  of  Labor  Grant  2012  •  Researched  CBE  and  trained  by  WGU  •  Re-­‐engineered  exis.ng  curriculum  and  added  

new,  working  with  Industry  experts  •  Converted  4  Associate  IT  Degrees  and    6  IT  

Cer.ficates    •  Focused  on  Programming,  Soiware  Tes.ng,  

Web  Programming  and  Computer  Support  •  Developed  32  CBE  courses      

 

 Aus2n  Community  College CBE  Courses:      •  First  offerings  Fall  2013-­‐-­‐-­‐50  students  •   615  unique  students  •  40  Graduates-­‐-­‐-­‐85%  Employed  in  Field  •  Extended  CBE  courses  to  Visual  

Communica.ons  •  Offer  CBE  courses  to  High  School  Students  in  

Emporium    Style-­‐-­‐-­‐Fall  2015  •  Developing  Career  Pathways  program  for  Low-­‐

Income  adults-­‐-­‐-­‐Fall  2015  •  130  Business  and  Industry  Partners  

 

Faculty  Buy-­‐In

CBE4CC

Faculty  Buy-­‐In

• Aus.n  • Presented  as  an  opportunity  and  challenge  to  re-­‐engineer  Curriculum  •  S.pend  to  develop  and  revise  curriculum  •  Training  provided  by  Western  Governor’s  University  • College  Administra.on  support  and  commitment  •  Faculty  could  choose  to  be  part  of  the  team  •  Faculty  had  exper.se  in  content  area  and  on-­‐line  learning  

CBE4CC

Faculty  Buy-­‐In

• Columbia  Basin  •  Not  an  issue  since  faculty  were  hired  specifically  for  CBE  

•  Sinclair  •  Change  in  CIS  Department  leadership  between  grant  proposal  and  grant  award  

•  CIS  faculty  experienced  with  online  •  Presented  to  faculty  as  an  opportunity  to  lead  the  college  and  the  state  

•  Faculty  could  opt  out  •  Not  a  good  fit  for  all  faculty  

Faculty  Roles

CBE4CC

Unbundling  Faculty  Roles 1.  Course  Development    2.  Assessment  Development  3.  Facilita.on  4.  Grading  5.  Student  Performance  Monitoring  

Faculty  Role-­‐Course  Development

CBE4CC

Faculty  Role-­‐Course  Development

•  Aus.n  •  Review  curriculum  with  Industry  Advisory  CommiYee  •  Collaborate  with  Industry  Experts  to  update  knowledge  and  skills  

•  Develop  competencies  with  industry  experts  and  industry  standards  required  on  cer.fica.on  exams  

•  Develop  Competencies    using  Bloom’s  taxonomy  •  Develop  the  course  working  with  Instruc.onal  Designer  and  Mul.-­‐Media  person  

•  Computer  Studies  Chair  coordinated  the  process  •  Evalua.on  by  Peers  and  designer  throughout  the  process  •  Measure  the  Course  using  standards  of  Quality  MaYers    •  Fine  tune  and  update  the  course  during  the  first  semester  offering  

CBE4CC

Faculty  Role-­‐Course  Development

• Columbia  Basin  •  Develop  Competencies:  System  Faculty  early  in  the  project;  many  competencies  had  to  be  reworked.  

•  Select  and  adapt  open  content:  Instruc.onal  faculty  (as  SME)  and  Lumen  Learning.  

•  Build  course  content:  Lumen  Learning.  •  Build  course  in  Canvas:  Instruc.onal  faculty.  •  Content  focus  may  have  weakened  competency  development.  

CBE4CC

Faculty  Role-­‐Course  Development

•  Sinclair  •  Development  team  

•  2  or  more  faculty  •  Led  by  Instruc.onal  Designer  •  Supported  by  Instruc.onal  Designer,  Instruc.onal  Technologists,  Media  developers,  and  Technical  Assistants  

•  6-­‐month  development  cycle  with  scheduled  milestones  and  deadlines  

•  Faculty  serve  as  SME  •  Faculty  map  competencies  to  content  and  assessments  •  Faculty  develop  content  and  assessments  

•  Faculty  determine  how  to  divide  up  the  work  •  Required  to  adhere  to  template  and  .meline  •  Required  to  meet  QM  standards  (QM  review  prior  to  go  live)  

Faculty  Role-­‐Assessment  Development

CBE4CC

Faculty  Role-­‐Assessment  Development • Aus.n  •  Faculty  developed  the  pre  and  post  assessment  tools  including  exam  ques.ons  and  projects  

•  Student  achieves  90%  or  greater  on  pre-­‐assessment  skip  directly  to  the  assessment  exam  

•  All  assessments  map  to  competency  •  Faculty  allow  students  2  to  3  .mes  to  pass  the  assessment  exam  

•  Can’t  move  on  to  next  competency  un.l  passing  previous  one  

CBE4CC

Faculty  Role-­‐-­‐Assessment  Development

• Columbia  Basin  •  Develop  prac.ce  and  forma.ve  assessments:  Instruc.onal  faculty.  

•  Develop  summa.ve  performance  assessments:  Instruc.onal  faculty.  

•  Quiz  items  associated  with  each  competency  as  an  ini.al  check.  

•  Performance  assessments  can  include  mul.ple  competencies.  

 

CBE4CC

Faculty  Role-­‐Assessment  Development •  Sinclair  •  Faculty  develop  the  assessments  or  select  ques.ons  from  publisher  pool  

•  May  or  may  not  be  same  faculty  member  who  develops  course  content  

•  Objec.ve  and  performance  assessments  •  Assessment  items  must  be  mapped  to  competencies  •  All  course  competencies  must  be  associated  with  assessment  items  

Faculty  Role-­‐Facilita2on

CBE4CC

Faculty  Role-­‐Facilita2on

• Aus.n  •  Full-­‐.me  or  Adjunct  Faculty  may  be  assigned  to  courses  •  Grade  exams  and  projects  •  Responsible  for  students  in  course  •  Communicate  progress  to  students  and  Student  Support  Coach  

•  Update  course  with  changes  in  technology  

CBE4CC

Faculty  Role-­‐-­‐Facilita2on

• Columbia  Basin  •  Feedback  on  assessment  provided  by  instruc.onal  faculty.  

•  Students  can  seek  help  at  any  point  from  instructor  or  success  coach.  

•  No  fixed  deadlines.  • Weekly  check-­‐in  with  students  •  Coach  iden.fies  struggling  students,  perhaps  with  alert  from  faculty.  

CBE4CC

Faculty  Role-­‐Facilita2on

•  Sinclair  •  Course  facilitated  by  approved  CIS  faculty  member—Full-­‐.me  or  adjunct  

•  May  or  may  not  be  the  same  faculty  who  were  involved  in  course  development  

•  Respond  to  student  ques.ons  •  Grade  •  Reach  out  to  students  who  may  be  struggling  •  Reach  out  to  students  who  may  not  be  ac.vely  engaged  •  Collaborate  with  coach  on  performance  monitoring  

Faculty  Role-­‐Grading

CBE4CC

Faculty  Role-­‐Grading

• All  •  Faculty  of  record  does  all  the  student  grading  

Faculty  Role-­‐Student  Performance  Monitoring

CBE4CC

Faculty  Role-­‐Student  Performance  Monitoring • Aus.n  •  Faculty  monitors  the  Student  Performance  •  Faculty  alerts  the  student  of  their  progress  •  Faculty  has  20-­‐24  students  per  course  sec.on  

CBE4CC

Faculty  Role-­‐-­‐Student  Performance  Monitoring

• Columbia  Basin  •  Student  progress  monitored  by  faculty  and  success  coach.  

•  Success  coach  primarily  responsible  for  reaching  out  to  students  who  are  not  ac.vely  engaged  and  involves  faculty  as  needed.  

•  No  current  limit  on  retake  of  assessments  or  extent  of  feedback  for  each  aYempt.  

 

CBE4CC

Faculty  Role-­‐Student  Performance  Monitoring •  Sinclair  •  Faculty  monitor  student  performance  on  graded  items  •  Allow  second  aYempt  on  projects  where  grade  is  below  80  aier  counseling  student  

•  Academic  coaches  monitor  student  progress  and  grades  •  Bi-­‐Weekly  coaching  sessions;  intervene  as  needed  •  Alert  faculty  of  non-­‐performance  

Coach/Faculty  Collabora2on

CBE4CC

Coach/Faculty  Collabora2on

• Aus.n  •  Faculty  alerts  Coach  that  student  is  missing  an  exam  or  assignment  

•  Coach  reports  back  to  Faculty  •  Coach  does  not  have  access  to  student  grades  •  Coach  alerts  faculty  concerning  issues  that  student  is  experiencing  

•  Coach  documents  interac.on  with  student  

CBE4CC

Coach/Faculty  Collabora2on

• Columbia  Basin  •  Coach  takes  lead  on  communica.ons  with  students.    • Weekly  status  communica.on  between  coach  and  faculty.  

•  Coach  and  faculty  have  separate,  private  communica.ons  with  students  but  can  cc  or  provide  status  update  to  the  other  on  a  case-­‐by-­‐case  basis.  

•  Coach  keeps  most  documenta.on  of  communica.ons  with  students.  

•  Instructors  keep  documenta.on  of  academic  communica.ons  with  students.  

•  Coach  intervenes  when  faculty  escalates  an  issue  to  coach.  

CBE4CC

Coach/Faculty  Collabora2on •  Sinclair  

•  Case  management  student  support  model  •  Every  student  has  an  assigned  Academic  Coach  •  Coach  monitors  student  progress  /  behavior  

•  Weekly  coach  reports  with  login  and  grade  informa.on  •  Bi-­‐Weekly  conversa.on  with  student  •  Escalates  problems  to  faculty  as  needed  

•  Role  of  coach  •  Documented  •  Jointly  developed  by  Faculty  Senate  representa.ves  and  Academic  Coaches  

•  Faculty  –  Coach  rela.onship  is  important  •  Faculty  member  must  be  comfortable  with  the  coach  interac.on  with  their  students  

CBE4CC

Coach/Faculty  Collabora2on •  Sinclair  

•  Faculty  •  Intervenes  with  student  when  an  issue  is  escalated  by  coach  •  Monthly  status  report  on  the  course  

•  Informal  Interac.on  •  Faculty  members  and  coaches  contact  each  other  to  discuss  various  student  issues  

Policies—Email  Response  Time

CBE4CC

Policies-­‐Email  Response  Time

• Aus.n  •  Faculty  response  .me  is  within  2  days  •  Majority  respond  within  24  hours  

• Columbia  Basin  •  Two  business  days  

•  Sinclair  •  Faculty  are  expected  to  respond  to  student  emails  within  24  hours  

•  Faculty  typically  have  their  course  email  forwarded  to  their  Outlook  mail  

Policies—Grading  Response  Time

CBE4CC

Policies-­‐-­‐Grading  Response  Time

• Aus.n  •  No  set  policy  as  it  depends  on  the  complexity  of  the  assignment  

•  Best  prac.ce  is  2  to  4  business  days  • Columbia  Basin  •  Receipt  acknowledged  within  two  business  days.  •  Grading  completed  within  five  business  days.  

•  Sinclair  •  48  business  hours  

Policies—Grading  Load

CBE4CC

Policies-­‐Grading  Load

•  Aus.n  •  Faculty  grade  the  work  of  20-­‐24  students  •  Exams  may  be  part  Objec.ve  and  Problem  based.    Automa.c  grading  is  very  limited  

•  Students  may  accelerate  but  not  fall  behind  so  grading  is  balanced  across  the  term  

•  Students  may  be  enrolled  in  16  week  but  transi.on  to  12  or  8  weeks  upon  comple.on  to  succeeding  courses  

•  Columbia  Basin  •  No  polices  as  yet  on  limi.ng  the  number  of  weekly  submissions  

•  No  policies  as  yet  on  limi.ng  the  number  of  submissions  occurring  near  end-­‐of-­‐term  

•  Pilot  enrollment  is  low  so  risk  of  overload  is  minimal;  policies  will  be  developed  as  we  learn  more  

CBE4CC

Policies-­‐Grading  Load

•  Sinclair  •  CIS  courses  have  heavy  grading  load  due  to  required  projects  and  labs  which  must  be  hand  graded  

•  Out-­‐of-­‐sequence  grading  is  a  challenge  •  End  of  term  grading  “meltdown”  preven.on  

•  Student  can  only  submit  5  graded  items  the  last  week  of  the  term  

•  Final  exam  and  final  project  must  be  submiYed  by  Tuesday  of  finals  week  

Payload

CBE4CC

Payload

• Aus.n  •  Course  Development  

•  13,000  per  course  includes  reviewing  curriculum,  re-­‐engineering  exis.ng  curriculum,  refining  and  upda.ng  1st  semester  offered,  and  training  faculty  to  teach  the  course  

•  Faculty  of  record  •  Regular  faculty  pay  •  Combine  sec.ons  so  the  combined  sec.on  to  meet  the  minimum  enrollment  requirement  

• Columbia  Basin  •  Four  FT  faculty  teach  three  courses  each,  fixed  yearly  salary  

•  Six  PT  faculty  teach  1  course  each,  salary  per  course,  not  enrollment  

CBE4CC

Payload

•  Sinclair  •  Course  Development  

•  Faculty  serve  as  SMEs  •  All  work  overseen  and  supported  by  Instruc.onal  Design  team    •  5  payload  hours  or  $5,000  divided  amongst  the  faculty  developers  

•  Course  Facilita.on  •  .2  payload  hours  per  student/course  •  Since  students  can  enroll  throughout  the  term,  load  cannot  be  determined  un.l  the  end  of  term  

•  Danger  of  pusng  faculty  in  an  overload  situa.on  

Ques2ons

Contact  Informa2on Aus$n  Community  College  

Mary  Kohls,  Professor,  Computer  Studies  Chair  [email protected]    

Columbia  Basin  College  Connie  Broughton,  SBCTC,  CBE  Project  Director,  [email protected]  

Cathy  Clary,  CBC,  Student  Services  Coordinator,  [email protected]  Steve  Gance,  SBCTC,  CBE  Curriculum  &  Technology,  [email protected]  

 Sinclair  Community  College  

Nancy  Thibeault,  Dean  eLearning,  Project  Director,  Accelerate  IT,  [email protected]  

   


Recommended