+ All Categories
Home > Documents > FandPnet

FandPnet

Date post: 07-Jan-2016
Category:
Upload: nitesh
View: 25 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend
Description:
www.FandPnet.com. Baltimore Easton Hagerstown Herndon Tampa Wilmington. Breaking Up is Hard to Do: Disciplining Your Problem Employees Albert B. Randall, Jr., Esq. Quality Representation, Personal Service. Handbooks. Drafting – HR Manager or Atty.? Cost-benefit analysis - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
24
www.FandPnet.com Breaking Up is Hard to Do: Disciplining Your Problem Employees Albert B. Randall, Jr., Esq. Baltimore Easton Hagerstown Herndon Tampa Wilmington Quality Representation, Personal Service
Transcript
Page 1: FandPnet

www.FandPnet.com

Breaking Up is Hard to Do:Disciplining Your Problem

Employees

Albert B. Randall, Jr., Esq.

Baltimore

Easton

Hagerstown

Herndon

Tampa

Wilmington

Quality Representation, Personal Service

Page 2: FandPnet

2

Handbooks

• Drafting – HR Manager or Atty.?– Cost-benefit analysis– HR Manager should draft policy– Atty. should review for legal compliance– Pre-written policies (one size does NOT fit all)

• Plain language approach – NO LEGALESE!!

Quality Representation, Personal Service

Page 3: FandPnet

3

At-will Employment

• Maryland standard

• May terminate employee for any reason– Non-contract employees– Termination may not violate public policy

(Adler)

• Employers should have at-will disclaimer– Handbook or– Stand alone policy

Quality Representation, Personal Service

Page 4: FandPnet

4

At-Will Disclaimers• Handbook may be found to be employment contract

w/o disclaimer (may form implied contract)• Cover page in handbook• Large, bold typeface, conspicuous• Acknowledgement of receipt by employee• Sample language:

– “This handbook contains the complete agreement between the company and its employees. Nothing in this handbook should be interpreted as a contract of employment. Either the company or you may terminate the employment relationship at any time and for any reason.”

Quality Representation, Personal Service

Page 5: FandPnet

5

Drafting Policies• Generally, employers are free to draft any

personnel policy relevant to its business/workforce

• No-no’s– Those prohibited by statute or case law – Those that conflict with a contract (CBA or NLRA)– Those that jeopardize health or safety of workforce– Those that conflict with public policy

• Yes-yes’s– EEO policy– FMLA policy

Quality Representation, Personal Service

Page 6: FandPnet

6

Drafting Policies (cont.)

• Overly broad– Sweeping statements in an effort to regulate

as much as possible– Language is often vague– Often contain unenforceable provisions

• Overly narrow– Extreme regulation of employee conduct– Impossible to cover everything– May have negative psychological impact

Quality Representation, Personal Service

Page 7: FandPnet

7

Drafting Policies (cont.)• Better to draft “happy medium” policies

• Ensure that policies are legally enforceable

• Equally importantly, ensure that the policies are practically and uniformly enforced

– Need to allow discretion

• Ensure that front-line managers and supervisors are trained on policies and are held

accountable for their implementation

Quality Representation, Personal Service

Page 8: FandPnet

8

Policies to Consider

• FMLA (required)• EEO (required)• At-will disclaimer• Employee privacy/emails• Leave (sick, vacation, personal, military, jury,

bereavement)• Disciplinary• Workplace violence• Substance abuse

Quality Representation, Personal Service

Page 9: FandPnet

9

Policies to Consider

• No-solicitation

• OSHA/safety policies

• Employee codes of conduct/dress

• Benefits (COBRA, etc.)

• Off-duty/moonlighting

• Arbitration of employment disputes– Jury Trial Waivers/Venue Provisions

Quality Representation, Personal Service

Page 10: FandPnet

10

Hiring Practices

• No unintended promises– Recruiting– Employment applications– Offer letters

• No discriminatory questions– Disability, gender, national origin, religion

• Up-to-date Job descriptions

Quality Representation, Personal Service

Page 11: FandPnet

11

Discipline

• Three types:– Zero tolerance– Progressive – Hidden/reactionary

Quality Representation, Personal Service

Page 12: FandPnet

12

Progressive Discipline

• Publish the policy– Informs employee of expectations

• Draft policy so that it does not contractually bind employer– Be wary of “shalls”, “wills”, “musts”– Permit discretion– Remind of “at-will” employment in discipline policy

• Be intentionally vague in terms of discipline for various offenses

Quality Representation, Personal Service

Page 13: FandPnet

13

Documentation

• Do supervisors maintain incident logs?

• Have verbal warnings been documented/retained in personnel files?

• Are copies of written warnings retained?

Quality Representation, Personal Service

Page 14: FandPnet

14

Documentation (cont.)

• Verbal warning– Employee/supervisor’s name & date of

warning– Reason for warning– Opportunity for employee to respond– Corrective measures– Statement that failure to correct will result in

more serious discipline, including up to termination

Quality Representation, Personal Service

Page 15: FandPnet

15

Documentation (cont.)

• Written warning– Signed acknowledgement/date from employee– Signed/dated by supervisor– Include acknowledgment from employee that

the failure to undertake corrective measures will result in more severe discipline

– If employee refuses to sign, supervisor should note

Quality Representation, Personal Service

Page 16: FandPnet

16

Performance Appraisals

• Do they match the employee’s performance?

• If not, may be difficult to discipline/terminate/prevail in litigation

Quality Representation, Personal Service

Page 17: FandPnet

17

Do You Investigate?

• Does law require investigation?

• Is there a contractual obligation to investigate?

• Concerns for future liability?

Quality Representation, Personal Service

Page 18: FandPnet

18

Choosing the Investigator

• Match the investigator to the situation• Consider training and qualifications• Consider nature of allegations• Consider second investigator for

corroboration

Quality Representation, Personal Service

Page 19: FandPnet

19

Principles Underlying Investigations

• Fairness

• Notice to accused

• Opportunity to respond

• Fundamental fairness– Does the result pass the “smell test?”

Quality Representation, Personal Service

Page 20: FandPnet

20

Gathering Information

• Consider all records, voicemail, e-mail, telephone records, computer records, photographs and security videotapes

• Preserve originals• Interview witnesses• Maintain impartiality• Preserve confidentiality• Focused questioning

Quality Representation, Personal Service

Page 21: FandPnet

21

Making the Decision

• Consider suspending pending investigation before immediately terminating

• Have you interviewed all witnesses, including accused and those witnesses identified by accused?

• Have you followed the policy? • Have you acted fairly/non-discriminatorily?• Have you documented everything?• Do you have a witness at the termination

meeting?

Quality Representation, Personal Service

Page 22: FandPnet

22

Documenting the Decision

• Equally important as documenting the investigation

• Helps establish rationale behind decision

Quality Representation, Personal Service

Page 23: FandPnet

23

Guarding Against Retaliation Claims

• Retaliation claims fastest growing EEOC claim

• Need to advise Complainants and other participants of no tolerance for retaliation

• Follow up to ensure that no retaliation has taken place

Quality Representation, Personal Service

Page 24: FandPnet

24

Questions?

Albert (“Bert”) B. Randall, Jr., Esq.Franklin & Prokopik

The B&O Building2 N. Charles Street, Suite 600

Baltimore, MD 21201(410) 230-3622

[email protected]

Baltimore MD Easton MD Hagerstown MD Herndon VA Tampa FL Wilmington DE

Quality Representation, Personal Service