Vol. 4, 1803-1811, July 1998 Clinical Cancer Research 1803
Fas Ligand Is Constitutively Secreted by Prostate Cancer
Cells in Vitro
Qiang-Yuan Liu,’ Mark A. Rubin, Coral Omene,
Seth Lederman, and C. A. Stein”2Departments of Medicine [Q-Y. L., C. 0., 5. L., C. A. S.],Pharmacology [C. A. S.], and Pathology [M. A. RI, ColumbiaUniversity, College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York, New
York 10032
ABSTRACTLNCaP, DU145, and PC3 prostate carcinoma cells se-
crete the 27-kDa soluble Fas ligand (sFasL) into their local
environment. sFasL arises from the 40-kDa membrane-
bound form (mFasL), which can be found on the cell surface
in the LNCaP line, as demonstrated by monoclonal antibody
staining. mFasL was also found in extracts of all three cell
lines, as demonstrated by Western blotting. FasL mRNA
was detected not only in the cell lines, but in the normal
prostate as well. sFasL protein could also be detected im-
munohistochemically in prostate secretions and in human
semen. Cleavage of mFasL to sFasL could be inhibited by
several matrix metalloprotease inhibitors without a change
in the cellular levels of FasL. Prostate-derived sFasL is
biologically active, as demonstrated by its induction of ap-
optosis in Fas-positive Ramos cells, which was detected by
terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase-mediated nick end la-
behing assay.
Mitoxantrone induces cellular apoptosis in all three
prostate cancer cell lines. Mitoxantrone treatment and doxo-
rubicin treatment also cause up-regulation of Fas, the cell
surface receptor for FasL, in LNCaP cells, but not in DU14S
or PC3 cells. Furthermore, the up-regulation of Fas expres-
sion by mitoxantrone at a high concentration was potenti-
ated by hydrocortisone. When FasL interacts with its Fas,
the Fas-bearing cell undergoes apoptosis. When LNCaP
cells were treated with mitoxantrone and incubated with an
anti-FasL monoclonal antibody, apoptosis was partially
blocked. This not only further suggests that the sFasL is
biologically active, but that the up-regulation of Fas in the
presence of sFasL accounts, in part, for the cytotoxicity of
mitoxantrone.
Received 2/2/98; revised 4/27/98; accepted 4/27/98.
The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the
payment of page charges. This article must therefore be hereby markedadvertisement in accordance with 1 8 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to
indicate this fact.
I Q-Y. L. and C. A. S. are the recipients of a grant from CaPCURE,directed by the David Koch Foundation.2 To whom requests for reprints should be addressed, at Departments ofMedicine and Pharmacology, Columbia University, College of Physi-cians and Surgeons, 630 West 168th Street, New York, NY 10032.Phone: (212) 305-3606; Fax: (212) 305-7348; E-mail: [email protected].
INTRODUCTIONFas (APO-l/CD9S) is a type I membrane protein that is a
member of the tumor necrosis factor/nerve growth factor recep-
tor superfamily (1) that also includes CD4O, CD27, CD3O, and
OX4O (2). It is expressed in activated T and B cells, in malig-
nant T and B cells, and in several other tissues, including the
thymus, liver, heart, and ovary (2-5). Recent data (6) indicate
that cell surface Fas can be up-regulated after treatment of
HepG2 hepatoma cells with either bleomycin, methotrexate, or
cisplatin.
FasL,3 similar to tumor necrosis factor a, is synthesized as
a membrane-bound 40-kDa protein (mFasL) that can be cleaved
to the soluble 27-kDa species (sFasL) by matrix metalloprotein-
ases (7). When FasL or agonist anti-Fas Abs bind to Fas, cellular
apoptosis is induced. Analysis of the Fas!FasL system has
indicated that it is involved in the clonal deletion of peripheral
T cells and in the general down-regulation of the immune
response, including a diminution in cytotoxic T-cell-mediated
cytotoxicity (8, 9).
The involvement of Fas and FasL as a possible mechanism
whereby tumors escape the immune system has recently been
proposed. Hahne et al. (10) detected sFasL in the serum of 18 of
35 patients with malignant melanoma and detected mFasL in
several types of melanoma cells, but not in normal melanocytes.
Furthermore, melanoma cells seemed to be capable of killing
Fas-bearing immune effector cells. Tanaka et a!. ( I ) detected
sFasL in the sera of patients with both large granular lympho-
cytic leukemia and natural killer cell lymphoma. High levels of
sFasL were also observed in a patient with an aggressive nasal
lymphoma who succumbed to hepatic failure, perhaps due to the
induction of apoptosis in Fas-expressing hepatocytes. FasL has
also been proposed to have a protective role in immune-privi-
leged sites, including the stromal cells of the retina ( 1 1 , I 2),
inner ear, testis (Sertohi cells; Refs. 1 1 and 12), cornea (13), and
brain (14, 15), and seems to be involved in the destruction of
thyrocytes that occurs in Hashimoto’s thyroiditis (16).
O’Connell et a!. (17) have proposed that SW620 colon cancer
cells can avoid immune surveillance by expressing high levels
of FasL. Interestingly, these cells also express cell surface Fas,
perhaps in an inactive form. These data are highly suggestive of
the idea that the FasIFasL system plays a general and highly
complex role in the life and death cycle of human solid tumors.
Prostate cancer is now the second leading cause of cancer
3 The abbreviations used are: FasL, Fas ligand; sFasL, soluble FasL:mFasL, membrane-bound FasL; Ab, antibody; mAb, monoclonal Ab;HRPC, hormone-refractory prostate cancer; DAPI, 4’ ,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole: SF, suicide-fratricide: RT, reverse transcription: GAPDH.glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase; ECL, enhanced chemilu-
minescence; TBS, Tris-buffered saline; MT1’, 3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-
yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide; MMI, matrix metalloprotease in-
hibitor; MMP, matrix metalloprotease.
Research. on May 29, 2021. © 1998 American Association for Cancerclincancerres.aacrjournals.org Downloaded from
1804 Prostate Cancer Cells Secrete FasL in Vitro
deaths in adult males, claiming over 41 ,000 lives in the United
States annually ( 18). Whereas primary treatment for metastatic
disease consisting predominately of the administration of leu-
tinizing hormone-releasing hormone antagonists in combination
with a nonsteroidal antiandrogen (e.g., flutamide) will palliate as
many as three-fourths of patients, the tumor will invariably
cease to respond to this therapy within a median time of 3.5
years (19). Until recently, treatment of metastatic HRPC with
cytotoxic chemotherapy has been relatively ineffective. How-
ever, recent studies have demonstrated clinical activity by a
combination of a taxane plus estramustine (20, 21). Further-
more, a study by Tannock et a!. (22) has suggested that the
combination of mitoxantrone plus prednisone may significantly
improve quality of life in as many as 38% of patients with
HRPC.
The mechanisms of prostate cancer cell apoptosis are com-
plicated and are not well understood. Approximately 40% of
advanced clinical prostate cancers overexpress bcl-2 (23).
Taxol-induced changes in the phosphorylation pattern of bcl-2
seem to correlate with the induction of cellular apoptosis, at
least in cell lines (24, 25). Furthermore, Taxol-induced apopto-
sis, as demonstrated by the formation of ladders and DAPI
staining, was associated with the down-regulation of both bdl-xL
mRNA and protein. No changes were observed in the cellular
levels of bax, bcl-x5, or Fas mRNA or protein (26). Neverthe-
less, Fas has also recently been implicated in cellular apoptosis
in two of six prostate cancer cell lines (27).
Here we present evidence that not only do all three prostate
cancer cell lines constitutively secrete biologically active FasL
into their local environment, but that FasL mRNA can be found
in the normal prostate, and FasL protein can be found in normal
prostate secretions. We also show that whereas Fas is minimally
expressed on the surface of these prostate cancer cell lines,
treatment of LNCaP cells but not DUI45 or PC3 cells with
mitoxantrone plus hydrocortisone dramatically up-regulates its
expression. In this context, the anthracycline-induced up-regu-
lation of Fas in LNCaP cells may possibly then create a SF loop,
which seems to be one of the mechanisms by which anthraqui-
nones act to kill susceptible cells.
MATERIALS AND METHODSCells. LNCaP, DUI45, and PC3 prostate cancer cells
were purchased from American Type Culture Collection (Rock-
ville, MD) and cultured in RPMI 1640 supplemented with 10%
FCS in 95% air:5% CO2. Cells in complete media were treated
with different concentrations of mitoxantone (Immunex, Seat-
tIe, WA) or doxorubicin (Gensia, Irvine, CA) for the times
indicated in “Results.” The cells were harvested, and the pro-
teins and total RNA were extracted as described below.
Isolation of Apoptotic DNA Fragments. DNA frag-
mentation assays were performed as described previously, with
modification (28). Briefly, 2 X 106 LNCaP cells treated with
0.2-1 �.LM mitoxantrone for 24 h were lysed in 1% NP4O, 20 mrvi
EDTA, and 50 mM Tris-HCI (pH 7.5; 100 p.1/106 cells). After
centrifugation for 5 mm at 15,000 X g, the supernatant was
collected, and the extraction was repeated with additional lysis
buffer (50 p.1/hO6 cells). The supernatants were brought to a 1%
SDS concentration and treated with RNase A (final concentra-
tion, 200 pg!ml) at 56#{176}Cfor 1 h, followed by digestion with
proteinase K (final concentration, 2.5 mg/ml) at 56#{176}Cfor 2 h.
The DNA was then precipitated with 2.5 volumes of ethanol and
dissolved in Tris-EDTA (ethylenediamminetetra acetate) buffer
(pH 7.4). Equal amounts of DNA as measured by UV absorb-
ance at 260 nm were electrophoresed on 1 .2% agarose gels
containing 0.5 mg!ml ethidium bromide and visualized by UV
transillumination.
Detection of Apoptotic Nuclei by DAPI Staining. Mor-
phological changes characteristic of apoptosis were determined
by staining cell nuclei with DAPI. Briefly, cells were plated
onto poly-D-lysine-coated tissue culture chamber slides (Nunc,
Inc., Naperville, IL) and incubated overnight. The cells were
treated with mitoxantrone (0.2 and 0.6 p.M) for 24 h and then
washed once with PBS. The cells were then fixed with 90%
ethanol and 5% acetic acid for 1 h at room temperature, washed
twice with PBS, and treated with a 1.5 mg/mI solution of DAPI
in PBS for 30 mm at room temperature. The slides were washed
twice with PBS, mounted, and photographed using a Nikon
phase-fluorescence microscope.
RT-PCR. The first strand cDNA was synthesized from 2
lLg of total RNA isolated from LNCaP, DU14S, or PC3 cells in
a 20-pA reaction mixture containing 4 �tl of 5 X RT reaction
buffer, 10 units of RNasin (Promega, Madison, WI), 200 p.M
deoxynucleotide triphosphate, 40 �M oligodeoxythymidyhic acid
primer, and 20 units of Moloney murine reverse transcriptase
(Promega). The mixture was incubated at 42#{176}Cfor 1 h and then
incubated at 53#{176}Cfor 30 mm. The unhybridized RNA was then
digested with 10 units of RNase H at 37#{176}Cfor 10 mm. The RT
products were diluted to 200 p.1 with Tris-EDTA (ethylenedi-
amminetetra acetate) buffer, and 4 p.1 of the diluted RT products
were subjected to PCR amplification using Fas- and FasL-
specific primers. The primer sequences were as follows: Fas
upstream, S’-ATGCCCAAGTGACTGACATC-3’; Fas down-
stream, 5’-GTCATfCTfGATCTCATCTATF-3’ (29): FasL
upstream, 5’-TCCAACTCAAGGTCCATGCC-3’; and FasL
downstream, 5’-CAGAGAGAGCTCAGATACGTf-3’ (16).
Thirty-five cycles of amplification were performed in a thermo-
cycler at 94#{176}C(1 mm), 57#{176}C(1 mm), and 72#{176}C(2 mm). The
RT-PCR products (725- and 342-hp fragments predicted for Fas
and FasL, respectively) were analyzed on 1 .2% agarose gels.
The amount of template RNA was normalized by using
human GAPDH primers as internal controls. The primer se-
quences for GAPDH were 5’-GTCAACGGAmGGTCTG-
TATf-3’ and 5’-AGTCTFCTGGGTGGCAGTGAT-3’, and the
cycling conditions were 1 mm at 94#{176}C,1 mm at 56#{176}C,and 2 mm
at 72#{176}C.To check for artifacts based on the possible contami-
nation of RNA by genomic DNA during RT-PCR, several PCR
reactions were performed using the same amount of mRNA as
template under identical conditions, but with no RT step (i.e., no
added reverse transcriptase).
Western Blot Analysis and Immunoprecipitation.
Cells (106) were lysed in 100 p.1 of ice-cold radioimmunopre-
cipitation assay buffer [50 m�i Tris-HCI (pH 8.0), 150 msi
NaCL, 0.1% SDS, 1% NP4O, and 0.5% sodium deoxycholate]
with 0. 1 mg/ml freshly added phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride, 1
mM sodium orthovanadate, and 30 mg!ml aprotinin; mixed
gently with a pipette; and incubated on ice for 30 mm. Cell
debris was removed by centrifugation. Protein concentrations
Research. on May 29, 2021. © 1998 American Association for Cancerclincancerres.aacrjournals.org Downloaded from
Fig. I A. detection of sFasL in conditioned media. Aliquots of fresh media (Lane I), LNCaP cell-conditioned media (Lane 2), LNCaP cells treatedwith 1 p.M mitoxantrone for 2 days (Lane 3) and with 4 p.M mitoxantrone plus 10 �i.M hydrocortisone for 2 days (Lane 4), PC3 cells (Lane 5), andDUI4S cells (Lane 6) were subjected to 10% SDS-PAGE and immunoblot analysis using an anti-FasL polyclonal Ab. B, immunoprecipitation ofsFas-L from conditioned media. Lane 1, LNCaP-conditioned media were immunoprecipitated with a specific anti-FasL mAb as described in the text:Lane 2, immunoprecipitation of LNCaP-conditioned media with nonspecific control anti-bcl 2 mAb; Lane 3, immunoprecipitation of fresh media withanti-FasL mAb.
Clinical Cancer Research 1805
AkDa 1 2 3 4
35-
29-
21-
5 6
were determined using the Bio-Rad protein assay system (Bio-
Rad Laboratories, Richmond, CA). Aliquots of cell extracts
containing 20 p.g of protein were resolved by 12% SDS-PAGE
and transferred to Hybond ECL filter paper (Amersham, Arling-
ton Heights, IL). Filters were incubated at 25#{176}Cfor 1 h in Blotto
A (5% nonfat milk powder in TBS [10 m�vt Tris-HC1 (pH 8.0)
and 150 mM NaCl] plus 0.05% Tween 20) and then incubated at
25#{176}Cfor I h in Blotto A containing a I :200 dilution of either
rabbit anti-Fas or anti-FasL polyclonal Abs (all from Santa Cruz
Biotechnology, Santa Cruz, CA). After washing in TBS +
0.05% Tween 20 buffer, filters were incubated for 45 mm at
25#{176}Cin TBS + 0.05% Tween 20 buffer containing a I :10,000
dilution of peroxidase-conjugated secondary Ab (Amersham
Life Sciences, Arlington Heights, IL). After washing, ECL was
performed using the procedure recommended by the manufac-
turer (Amersham). The filters were exposed to the X-ray film for
times ranging from 10-120 s. For immunoprecipitations, com-
plete media (fresh and conditioned) were cleared with irrelevant
mAb and protein A-Sepharose CL-4B (Sigma, St. Louis, MO).
Anti-FasL mAb (PharMingen, San Diego, CA) was then added
(2 p.g!ml) and incubated at 4#{176}Cfor 1 h. Protein A-Sepharose
beads were then added, and the incubation was continued at 4#{176}C
overnight. The beads were then collected by centrifugation,
washed three times with PBS, resuspended in an equal volume
of 2X SDS-PAGE loading buffer, boiled for 5 mm, and elec-
tophoresed on a 10% SDS-containing gel. Subsequently, the
proteins were transferred to Hybond ECL filters as described
above and probed with the anti-FasL mAb.
Studies on normal human seminal fluid were performed on
samples purchased from Cryogenics Laboratories (Minneapolis,
MN). Western blotting was performed as described above.
Immunohistochemistry for Fas and FasL. Prostatic tis-
sue was acquired from radical prostatectomy specimens with
institutional review board approval. Tumor samples were snap-
frozen and stored at -80#{176}C. Tumor sections were confirmed
histologically. For immunohistochemistry, 4-p.m-thick frozen
sections were cut on a Leica ciyostat. Sections were air-dried
and fixed in cold acetone (-20#{176}C) for 10 mm and stored at
sFas-L
BkDa 1 2 3
35-
29-
21-
-80#{176}C. After endogenous peroxidase activity had been
quenched with I .5% H2O2 in PBS and nonspecific binding of
the Abs had been blocked by 10% goat serum in PBS, sections
were incubated in PBS with 5% goat serum for 1 h at room
temperature with primary rabbit polyclonal Abs (both diluted
I :50). The anti-FasL and anti-Fas Abs were from Santa Cruz
Biotechnology. Sections were then rinsed three times for 5 mm
each in PBS and incubated with a secondary biotinylated goat
antirabbit Ab (1:100 in PBS) for 30 mm, rinsed again with PBS,
and incubated with avidin-peroxidase complex (I : 100; Vector
Laboratories, Burlingame, CA) for 30 mm. Diaminobenzidine
(250 p.g/ml in PBS) was used as a substrate for peroxidase to
detect the presence of target antigen by deposition of a brown
reaction product. Sections were counterstained with Mayer’s
hematoxylin, dehydrated, cleared with xylene, and coverslipped.
Determination of Cell Surface Fas and FasL Expression
by Flow Cytometry. Prostate cancer cells were detached from
the bottom of dishes in PBS containing 2.5 msi EDTA. The cells
were centrifuged, washed twice with PBS, and then incubated at
4#{176}Cfor 60 mm with 10 p.g/ml rabbit anti-Fas polyclonal Ab
(lgGl ; Santa Cruz Biotechnology) in PBS containing 1% FCS
(PBS/BSA) and 0.5 m�i EDTA. As controls, staining was per-
formed with both the secondary Ab only and a nonspecific
isotype-matched (anti-cyclin A) polyclonal Ab (Santa Cruz Bio-
technology). The cells were then washed twice with PBS and
incubated for 30 mm on ice with 10 p.g!ml affinity-purified
FITC-conjugated goat antirabbit IgGI (Jackson ImmunoRe-
search Laboratories, San Diego, CA) in the same buffer. Detec-
tion of mFasL was accomplished by the use of an antihuman
FasL mouse IgG1 (clone G247-4; PharMingen), with a FITC-
labeled goat antimouse IgG used as a secondary Ab (Life
Technologies, Inc., Grand Island, NY). Controls were as de-
scribed above, except that the irrelevant Ab was an antihuman
bcl-2 IgGl mAb (Santa Cruz Biotechnology). Cells were
washed twice with PBS and then resuspended in PBSIBSA. Cell
aggregates were removed by filtering through a 60-p.M mesh.
The mean fluorescence intensity of a population of 5000 cells
was determined on a Becton Dickinson FACScahibur in the
Research. on May 29, 2021. © 1998 American Association for Cancerclincancerres.aacrjournals.org Downloaded from
AkDa 1 2 3
44- __� � �- Fas-L
32-
B Mprlnpcdu
Fas-L
Fig. 2 Determination of cell surface FasL expression by flow cytom-
etry. Shown are histograms of LNCaP cells in which the mean channelnumber of fluorescence, as determined on a FACScalibur flow cytom-
eter, is plotted against arbitrary fluorescence units (counts). Each his-togram represents the counting of 5000 cells, as described in the text. A,
control fluorescence, secondary Ab only. B, staining with anti-FasL
mAb + secondary Ab, as described in the text.
presence or absence of mAb staining. Mean fluorescence chan-
nel intensities were expressed as the average of these measure-
ments ± the SD (n 3).
Induction of Apoptosis by LNCaP Supernatants. A
total of S X l0� Fas-positive Ramos 296 cells or control Fas-
negative 293/CD8 cells were washed and incubated overnight in
either complete media alone or complete media plus either
OKT4 control Ab (10 p.g!ml), anti-Fas Ab (PharMingen; 10
p.g!mI), or culture supernatants of LNCaP cells obtained from a
dense culture of LNCaP cells grown for approximately 1 week.
Cells were then assayed for apoptosis via terminal deoxynucle-
otidyl transferase-mediated nick end labeling assay and flow
cytometry using the Boehringer Mannheim (Indianapolis, IN) in
situ cell death fluorescence detection kit.
MTT Assay. Cells (7 X l0�) were plated in 96-well
plates and incubated for 24 h in 100 p.1 of complete media.
Various concentrations of mitoxantrone and the anti-FasL mAb
G247-4 (0.5 p.g!ml; PharMingen) were added, and the cells
were incubated for an additional 48 h. Then, 10 p.1 of MTTIPBS
(5 mg/mI MiT in PBS; Sigma) were added to each well and
incubated for 2.5 h at 37#{176}C, and 0.04 M HC1 (100 p.1) in
isopropanol was added with vigorous mixing. The absorption
was determined in a microtiter plate reader at 540 nm.
RESULTS
Prostate Cancer Cells Secrete Fas Ligand. Aliquots of
LNCaP-, DUI45-, or PC3-conditioned media (I or 2 days) were
electrophoresed in polyacrylamide gels under the conditions
given in “Materials and Methods.” As shown in Fig. 1, a band
migration with an apparent molecular mass of 27 kDa that
corresponds to the sFasL ( I 0) was observed. The 40-kDa mFasL
was not detected in samples of conditioned media. The 27-kDa
sFasL could also be immunoprecipitated from conditioned me-
dia (2 days) by the use of the anti-FasL mAb described in
�‘Materials and Methods” (Fig. 1). No sFasL was immunopre-
Fig. 3 A, immunoblot analysis of FasL protein in human prostatecancer cell lines. Protein samples (20 �i.g total protein/lane) were derivedfrom LNCaP (Lane 1), PC3 (Lane 2), and DUI45 (Lane 3) cells andsubjected to Western blotting with a polydlonal Ab as described in the
text. B, expression of FasL mRNA in normal prostate tissue (pr) and in
the LNCaP (In), PC3 (pc), and DUI45 (dii) cell lines. RT-PCR analysiswas performed using primers specific for FasL, as described in the text.
After 35 cycles, PCR products were electrophoresed onto a I .2% aga-
rose gel and stained with ethidium bromide. M, 4�xl74/Hinfl weightmarkers. The 342-bp FasL cDNA fragment can be seen between the31 l-bp and the approximately 4l3-bp markers.
cipitated with this mAb in fresh media. Furthermore, the secre-
tion of sFasL into the conditioned media (2 days) was not
significantly diminished in the continuous presence of mitox-
antrone (1-5 p.M) with or without hydrocortisone (10 jiM).
The 27-kDa sFasL represents the cleaved fragment of the
40-kDa mFasL. To demonstrate that the presence of this frag-
ment in the media was not only the result of prolonged cell
culture and concomitant cell death and release of cellular com-
ponents, we examined the cell surface expression of mFasL on
LNCaP cells using mAb staining and flow cytometry. As shown
in Fig. 2, mFasL could easily be detected on the cell surface of
LNCaP cells. Furthermore, as shown in Fig. 3, the approxi-
mately 40-kDa mFasL was readily detected in whole-cell ex-
tracts of all three prostate cancer cell lines by Western blotting.
The cleavage of mFasL to sFasL could be blocked by the MMIs
CGS 27023A (Mr 448) and 33090A (Mr 547; Novartis, Basel,
Switzerland). These compounds are highly specific inhibitors of
matrix metalloproteinases but do not distinguish between them.
Thus, CGS 27023A inhibits collagenase (MMP- 1 ), gelatinase B
(MMP-9), gelatinase A (MMP-2), and stromelysin with IC50s of
33, 8, 1 1 , and 50 nM, respectively. The blockade of cleavage was
demonstrated by a >80% decline in the level of sFasL in
LNCaP 2-day culture supernatants. The IC50 of cleavage in both
cases was < 1 jiM. No cellular cytotoxicity was observed, as
determined by the MiT assay. Moreover, as determined by
Western blotting, no change in the level of FasL in whole-cell
extracts was observed in these cells after MMI treatment.
We then evaluated the presence of FasL mRNA by RT-
PCR. As shown in Fig. 3, the predicted 342-bp fragment can be
observed in all three prostate cancer cell lines and in the total
RNA obtained from normal human prostate (Clontech, Palo
Alto, CA) as well. The identity of the 342-hp fragment was
confirmed by dideoxy sequencing.
We then examined radical prostatectomy specimens to
1806 Prostate Cancer Cells Secrete FasL in Vitro
00
Research. on May 29, 2021. © 1998 American Association for Cancerclincancerres.aacrjournals.org Downloaded from
.‘A.�.. �� � ..�. ; �
� � :�: t �
c’,.
B
; � :..
&
.
�
.�‘
.�‘-. .#{149}:#{149}��::. � �
Fig. 4 FasL is found in the normal prostate. Frozen sections from humanprostate specimens are shown. Representative nontumoral regions are de-picted. A, sFasL is found intraluminally in the secretions from prostateepithelial cells. B, normal prostate control specimen stained with isotype-
matched anti-fas Ab. No staining is seen within the gland lumena. C, mFasLis found on peripheral nerves in the prostate stroma. After treatment witheither the anti-Fas or anti-FasL polyclonal Abs. specimens were treated withbiotinylated goat antirabbit Ab and then with avidin-peroxidase and diami-nobenzidine, as described in “Materials and Methods.” Sections werecounterstained by Mayer’s hematoxylin.
determine the location of Fas and FasL by immunohistochem-
istry. Cytoplasmic Fas staining was seen in neoplastic cells and,
to a lesser extent, in benign glands (Fig. 4B), but its cellular
location could not be unambiguously determined by immuno-
histochemical staining.
Clinical Cancer Research 1807
mFasL was not seen on either normal or neoplastic prostate
cells. This was not surprising because of its cleavage to sFasL,
which would be washed out during specimen processing. How-
� � ever, strong sFasL staining was observed in the intraluminal
� secretions from benign prostate glands (Fig. 4A). No staining of
intraluminal secretions was observed with an irrelevant isotype-
matched Ab. Strong mFasL staining was also observed on
peripheral nerves in the prostate stroma (Fig. 4C). We then
examined specimens of normal human seminal fluid and were
able to detect sFasL in six of eight specimens by Western
blouing, implying that the normal prostate gland secretes sFasL
into the seminal fluid. However, it is possible that the sFasL in
seminal fluid may be produced by other organs in addition to the
prostate, e.g., testis.sFasL secreted by prostate cancer cells is biologically
active. Fas-positive Ramos 296 B cells were treated overnight
with 1-week culture supernatants from LNCaP cells. DNA nick-
ing, as assessed via a flow cytometric terminal deoxynucleotidyl
transferase-mediated nick end labeling assay, was dramatically
increased in treated cells versus Ramos 296 cells treated with
the anti-Fas Ab (10 p.g/ml) alone [43 versus 18% apoptotic;
1 2% of untreated cells were apoptotic (average of two separate
determinations; mean difference, < 15%)]. Fas-negative 293
control cells were only minimally affected by the culture super-
natants. In addition, mAb Mike-l (IgG rat monoclonal antihu-
man FasL, extracellular domain), but not an irrelevant isotype-
matched mAb, almost completely blocked the induction of
apoptosis by the LNCaP supernatants.
Mitoxantrone Causes Apoptosis and Up-Regulation of
Cell Surface Fas in LNCaP Cells. To determine whether
mitoxantrone-induced LNCaP death demonstrates the character-
istic DNA laddering of apoptosis, we examined genomic DNA
after treatment with 0.2 and 1 .0 p.M mitoxantone. As shown in
Fig. 5A, internucleosomal fragmentation of the DNA was oh-
served in the cells after treatment for 24 h. The extent of the
laddering was drug dose dependent. To further demonstrate that
mitoxantrone induced cellular apoptosis, we stained the cells
with the nuclear stain DAPI. As shown in Fig. SB, characteristic
cellular changes of apoptosis, including chromatin condensation
and nuclear fragmentation, were observed in at least 50% of the
LNCaP cells after 24 h of treatment with 0.6 p.M mitoxantone.
Furthermore, the treatment of LNCaP cells with mitox-
antrone caused a dramatic up-regulation in the amount of total
cellular Fas expression, as determined by Western blotting (Fig.
6A). However, FasL expression was not affected (Fig. 68).
Cellular Fas expression, as detected by Western blotting, was
also equally dramatically up-regulated by doxorubicin (0.2 and
1.0 p.si; I or 2 days; data not shown). No up-regulation of
cellular Fas expression could be detected in either DU145 or
PC3 cells in the presence of mitoxantrone.
Cell surface expression of Fas, as evaluated by flow cy-
tometry (Fig. 7, left), was also dramatically increased after
treatment of LNCaP cells with 1 p.M mitoxantrone for 24 h
(mean channel number of control, 6 ± 0.15; + anti-Fas mAb,
182 ± 2). The addition of hydrocortisone (10 jiM) to mitox-
antrone under identical conditions did not further increase up-
regulation of cell surface Fas (Fig. 7, right; mean channel
number, 127 ± 1.5; control, I 1 ± 0.3) However, at higher
mitoxantrone concentrations, hydrocortisone ( I 0 jiM) potenti-
Research. on May 29, 2021. © 1998 American Association for Cancerclincancerres.aacrjournals.org Downloaded from
A
Ml 23
B
�
#{149}%#{149}#{149}S#{149}41S
� S�#{248} . �
ia .
‘,,
I #{149}#{149}4�#{149} 1� b
A 12345
B 12345
� � � Fas-L
1808 Prostate Cancer Cells Secrete FasL in Vitro
Fig. 5 A, DNA laddering in LN-CaP cells after treating with mi-toxantrone. DNA was isolated asdescribed in the text, electrophore-sed on I .2% agarose, and stainedwith 0.5 mg/mI ethidium bromide.M, I 23-bp DNA ladder marker;Lane 1, untreated LNCaP cells;Lane 2, LNCaP cells treated with0.2 p.M mitoxantrone for 24 h;Lane 3, LNCaP cells treated with1 p.M mitoxantrone for 24 h. B,apoptosis in LNCaP cells as visu-alized by DAPI staining after mi-toxantrone treatment. Cells weregrown in poly-D-lysine-coated tis-sue culture chamber slides, fixed,
and stained with 1.5 mg/ml DAPIfor 30 mm. a, untreated LNCaPcells; b, LNCaP cells treated with0.6 �.i.M mitoxantrone for 24 h.Chromatin condensation and flu-clear fragmentation are clearly vis-ible.
ated the up-regulation of total cellular Fas, as assessed by
Western blotting. In the absence of the steroid, Fas protein was
up-regulated after treatment with up to 2 p.M mitoxantrone, but
not at higher concentrations (up to 5 jiM). In the presence of the
steroid, approximately equal up-regulation was seen in LNCaP
cells at all mitoxantrone concentrations tested (1-10 jisi; data
not shown). Up-regulation of Fas protein could also be corre-
hated with simultaneous up-regulation of the Fas mRNA, as
shown by semiquantitative RT-PCR, in which the predicted
725-bp DNA fragment could be observed (Fig. 6C). The identity
of this fragment was verified by dideoxy sequencing.
Maximal up-regulation of total cellular Fas expression was
dependent on the presence of hydrocortisone after mitoxantrone
washout. When LNCaP cells were treated for either I or 2 h with
4 jiM mitoxantrone, washed, and then reincubated in fresh
complete media for either 1 or 2 days, Fas expression was not
up-regulated (Fig. 8). In contrast, if hydrocortisone (10 jiM) was
added to the initial incubation, up-regulation of Fas was ob-
served, even after as long as 2 days. Moreover, as assessed
morphologically and by the MiT assay, these cells had under-
gone apoptosis and cell death, in sharp contrast to the LNCaP
cells that were hydrocortisone naive.
These data suggested that in the presence of mitoxantrone
plus hydrocortisone, a SF pathway of cell death had been
established. This pathway could be established because previ-
ously secreted sFasL still present in the supernatants could now
interact with cell surface Fas, whose expression had been up-
regulated by the drug combination. Alternatively, it is also
possible that mFasL may interact with the up-regulated cell
surface Fas on the same cells or on neighboring cells. To
validate this hypothesis, we treated LNCaP cells with increasing
and continuous concentrations of mitoxantrone (0-10 jiM) and
evaluated the fraction of living cells after 2 days by using the
�. rnRRSFas
C lj.tMMX
MLN6h ld2d
�-.---.- Fas
Fig. 6 Mitoxantrone induces up-regulation of Fas expression in LN-CaP cells. A, immunoblot analysis of total protein (20 jig protein/lane)extracted from untreated cells (Lane 1), cells treated with 0.2 p.M
mitoxantrone for 24 and 48 h (Lanes 2 and 3), and cells treated with Ip.M mitoxantrone for 24 and 48 h (Lanes 4 and 5). After gel electro-phoresis, the blots were probed with an anti-Fas polyclonal Ab andvisualized by ECL as described in the text. B, reprobing of the stripped
blot in A with an anti-FasL polyclonal Ab. C, expression of Fas mRNAin LNCaP cells treated with I p.M mitoxantrone for 6 h to 2 days. The
cDNA was synthesized and amplified by PCR using primers specific for
Fas. The PCR product of GAPDH amplification was used as a control.
After 35 cycles, the PCR products were electrophoresed on I .2% aga-rose gels and stained with ethidium bromide. M, 4xl74/HaeIII markers.The 725-bp Fas cDNA fragment can be seen between the 603- and872-bp markers.
Research. on May 29, 2021. © 1998 American Association for Cancerclincancerres.aacrjournals.org Downloaded from
A
B
12345
� �,- � � �‘ Fas
I 2345
10” 1O� 1O� 1O�’ 1O�’FL1�H FL1.H
C
�1
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8
Mitoxantrone, �tM
MiT assay in the presence or absence of the anti-FasL mAb. As
shown in Fig. 9, the presence of the mAb increased the LDS() of
mitoxantone by approximately three to four times, indicating
that the SF loop is one of the mechanisms by which mitox-
antone is able to kill prostate cancer cells. The addition of an
isotype-matched anti-bdl-xL mAb did not change the LD50 of
mitoxantrone.
DISCUSSION
It has previously been shown (14) that FasL mRNA can be
detected in moderate levels in mouse embryo seminal vesicles
and at low levels in the prostate. In this work, we have demon-
strated that three commonly available human prostate cancer
cell lines secrete FasL, and that FasL mRNA is found in the
normal human prostate gland and in human semen as well. In
clinical specimens, sFasL can be seen by immunohistochemistry
in prostatic secretions, but not on the cell membrane. It is
possible that matrix meta]loprotease activity in the prostate (30)
may contribute to the cleavage of FasL from its membrane-
bound form. This activity, as shown, can be inhibited by several
new MMIs. FasL present on intraprostatic nerve bundles is not
cleaved, possibly because these metalloproteases are intralumi-
nally located. In addition, the role of this peripheral nerve FasL
is unknown. mFasL has previously (3 1 ) been shown to be
present on the surface of human central nervous system neurons,
where it is thought to contribute to local immune protection.
Perhaps a similar mechanism is operative for peripheral nerves
in the normal prostate.
Clinical Cancer Research 1809
Fig. 7 Determination of cell surface Fas expression by flow cytometry.Shown are histograms of LNCaP cells in which the mean channelnumber of fluorescence, as determined on a FACScahibur flow cytom-
eter, is plotted against arbitrary fluorescence units (counts). Each his-togram represents the counting of 5000 cells. as described in the text. All
cells were treated with 1 p.M mitoxantrone for 24 h. Top panels, control
fluorescence and secondary Ab only. Bottom panels, staining with
anti-Fas polyclonal Ab + secondary Ab, as described in the text.
�Im�Fas
Fig. 8 Immunoblot analysis demonstrating up-regulation of Fas pro-tein in LNCaP cells in the presence of mitoxantrone plus hydrocorti-
sone. A, LNCaP cells were treated for I and 2 h with 4 p.M mitoxantroneand then washed. Cellular proteins were isolated after 1 and 2 days andimmunoblotted for Fas as described in the text. Lane 1, control (no
added mitoxantrone); Lane 2, 4 p.M mitoxantrone for 1 h, washed, andthen incubated for 1 day in fresh media: Lane 3, same as Lane 2 butincubated for 2 days; Lane 4, same as Lane 2, but 2 h of mitoxantroneincubation; Lane 5, same as Lane 3, but 2 h of mitoxantrone incubation.
B, same as A, but 10 p.M hyrdrocortisone were added in each lane alongwith the mitoxantrone.
Fig. 9 Cytotoxicity of mitoxantrone for LNCaP cells in the presence orabsence of the anti-FasL mAb. Shown is a plot of mitoxantrone con-
centration versus the percentage of living cells evaluated by the MiT
assay, as described in the text. #{149},no anti-FasL mAb present. 0, + 0.5
p.g/ml anti-FasL mAb. The incubation time was 48 h.
Research. on May 29, 2021. © 1998 American Association for Cancerclincancerres.aacrjournals.org Downloaded from
1810 Prostate Cancer Cells Secrete FasL in Vitro
Why should sFasL be found in normal human semen?
Given the ability of prostate cancer cell line-derived sFasL to
induce apoptosis in Fas-positive lymphocytes and the previously
demonstrated immunosuppressive properties of sFasL (32), we
postulate two reasons: (a) the presence of immune effector cells
and/or high local concentrations of cytokines and peroxides,
such as occurs in inflammatory conditions of the prostate, can be
very deleterious to spermatozoa and can lead to infertility; and
(b) the presence of activated immune cells in the female genital
tract. Indeed, the immunosuppressive properties of seminal fluid
have been long recognized and have been ascribed to such
soluble mediators as transforming growth factor 32 and pros-
taglandins (33).
It is also possible that the constitutive secretion of FasL,
although possibly originating as a protection system for sper-
matozoa, is co-opted by at least some tumor cells as a self-
protectant. In essence, this strategy is similar to the secretion of
immunoinhibitory factors such as transforming growth factor �3
by some ghioblastomas (34). In this context, it should be noted
that it is very rare to find infiltrating lymphocytes in specimens
of clinical prostate cancer.
Recently, Friesen et a!. (35) demonstrated that treatment of
CEM T cells with an anti-Fas Ab inhibited doxorubicin-induced
apoptosis. This occurred because doxorubicin (and methotexate
as well) stimulated FasL expression. Our data on prostate cancer
cells, on the other hand, demonstrated increased membrane Fas
protein and Fas mRNA expression after anthracycline treatment,
with no change in constitutive in FasL expression. Thus, our
observations are similar to those of Muller et a!. (6) in HepG2
hepatoma cells, which indicated that cell surface Fas can be
up-regulated after treatment with either bleomycin, methotrex-
ate, or cisplatin.
Nevertheless, as demonstrated above, it is possible to use
the apoptosis-inducing properties of the Fas system as an antin-
eoplastic strategy. Cell surface Fas was up-regulated in LNCaP
cells by anthracychine teatment, and this up-regulation was, in
the case of mitoxantone, potentiated at some concentrations by
hydrocortisone. This observation suggests that additional clini-
cal therapeutic efficacy may be achieved in HRPC if the steroids
are administered before as well as during the mitoxantrone
infusion. The mechanism of anthraquinone induction of Fas
up-regulation remains uncertain, but it is known that wild-type
p53 can regulate Fas expression (6, 36). Possibly, DNA damage,
which is known to be induced by anthraquinones, either by a
free radical mechanism or by topoisomerase II inhibition (37),
causes activation of wild-type p53, which can then mediate Fas
expression. This mechanism is consistent with our observations
that Fas up-regulation occurs only in LNCaP cells (wild-type
PS3), and not in DU14S (mutant p53) or PC3 (null p53) cells
(38). However, in other cell types, the regulation of cell surface
Fas expression may be p53 independent (39). In addition, the
Fas system is most likely not the only proapoptotic pathway
activated by anthracyclines in prostate cancer cells. Regardless,
the addition of an anti-FasL Ab to cultured LNCaP cells in-
creases the LD50 of mitoxantone by 4-fold. This demonstrates
that the Fas system is at least a contributor to the net anthracy-
chine-induced apoptotic process. An additional demonstration of
this lies in the fact that in the absence of up-regulation of Fas,
as described in the mitoxantrone washout experiments, cellular
apoptosis is greatly diminished. Finally, both bcl-2 and bcl-x
seem to protect Fas-overexpressing MCF-7 breast cancer cells
from apoptosis induced by an anti-Fas Ab (40). This suggests
that in at least some cell types, the two systems share common
effector molecules. However, the LNCaP cell line, which ex-
presses high levels of bdh-xL, is not protected against FasIFasL-
mediated apoptosis.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
C. A. S. thanks R. Fine, H. Fisch, M. Benson, and C. Olsson forhelpful comments and support.
REFERENCES
1. Tanaka, M., Suda, T., Haze, H., Nakamura, N., Sato, K., Kimura, F.,
Motoyoshi, K., Mizuki, M., Tagawa, S., Ohga, S., Hatake, K.,
Drummond, A., and Nagata, S. Fas ligand in human serum. Nat. Med.,3: 317-322, 1996.
2. Suda, T., Takahashi, T., Golstein, P., and Nagata, S. Molecularcloning and expression of the Fas ligand, a novel member of the tumornecrosis factor family. Cell, 75: 1 169-1 178, 1993.
3. Mariani, S., Matiba, B., Baumler, C., and Krammer, P. Regulation ofcell surface APO-llFas (CD95) ligand expression by metalloproteases.Eur. J. Immunol., 25: 2303-2307, 1995.
4. Krammer, P., Dhein, J., Walczak, H., Behrman, I., Mariani, S.,
Matiba, B., Fath, M., Daniel, P., Knipping, E., Westendorp, M., Sticker,K., Baumler, C., Hellbardt, S., Germer, M., Peter, M., and Debatin, K.The role of APO-l-mediated apoptosis in the immune system. Immunol.Rev., 142: 175-191, 1994.
5. Nagata, S., and Golstein, P. The fas death factor. Science (Washing-
ton DC), 267: 1449-1456, 1995.
6. Muller, M., Strand, S., Hug, H., Heinemann, H., Walczak, H.,Hofmann, W., Stremmel, W., Krammer, P., and Galle, P. Drug-inducedapoptosis in hepatoma cells is mediated by the CD95 (APO-1IFAS)
receptor/ligand system and involves activation of wild-type p53. J. Clin.
Investig., 99: 403-413, 1997.
7. Kayagaki, N., Kawasaki, A., Abata, T., Ohmoto, H., Ikeda, S., Inoue,S., Yoshino, K., Okumura, K., and Yagita, H. Metalloproteinase-medi-ated release of human Fas ligand. J. Exp. Med., 182: 1777-1783, 1995.
8. Adachi, M., Suematsu, S., Kondo, T., Ogasawara, J., Tanaka, T.,
Yoshida, N., and Nagata, S. Targeted mutation in the Fas gene causeshyperplasia in the peripheral lymphoid organs and liver. Nat. Genet., 11:
294-300, 1995.
9. Nagata, S., and Suda, T. Fas, and Fas ligand: lpr and gld mutations.Immunol. Today, 16: 39-43, 1995.
10. Hahne, M., Rimoldi, D., Schroter, M., Romero, P., Schreier, M.,French, L., Schneider, P., Bornand, T., Fontana, A., Lienard, D.,Cerottini, i-C., and Tschopp, J. Melanoma cell expression of Fas(Apo-
l/CD95) ligand: implications for tumor immune escape. Science (Wash-ington DC), 274: 1363-1366, 1996.
I 1. Griffith, T., Brunner, T., Fletcher, S., Green, D., and Ferguson, T.
Fas ligand-induced apoptosis as a mechanism of immune privilege.Science (Washington DC), 270: 1 189-1 192, 1995.
12. Bellgrau, D., Gold, D., Selawry, H., Moore, i., Franzusoff, A., andDuke, R. A role for CD95 ligand in preventing graft rejection. Nature(Lond.), 377: 630-632, 1995.
13. Stuart, P., Griffith, T., Usui, N., Pepose, J., Yu, X., and Ferguson,
T. CD95 ligand (FasL)-induced apoptosis is necessary for comeal al-lograft survival. I. Clin. Investig., 99: 369-402, 1997.
14. French, L., Hahne, M., Viard, I., Radlgruber, G.. Zanone, R.,
Becker, K., Muller, C., and Tschopp, J. Fas and Faa ligand in embryos
and adult mice: ligand expression in several immune-privileged tissuesand coexpression in adult tissues characterized by apoptotic cell turn-over. J. Cell Biol., 133: 335-343, 1996.
Research. on May 29, 2021. © 1998 American Association for Cancerclincancerres.aacrjournals.org Downloaded from
Clinical Cancer Research 1811
15. Griffith, T., Brunner, T., Fletcher, S., Green, D., and Ferguson, T.
Fas ligand-induced apoptosis as a mechanism of immune privilege.
Science (Washington DC), 270: 1 189-1 192, 1995.
16. Giordano, C., Stassi, G., DeMaria, R., Todaro, M., Richiusa, P.,Papoff, G., Ruberti, G., Bagnasco, M., Testi, R., and Galluzo, A.Potential involvement of Fas and its ligand in the pathogenesis ofHashimoto’s thyroiditis. Science (Washington DC), 275: 960-963,
1997.
17. O’Connell, J., O’Sullivan, G., Collins, J., and Shanahan, F. The Fascounterattack: Fas-mediated T cell killing by colon cancer cells express-
ing Fas ligand. I. Exp. Med., 184: 1075-1082, 1996.
18. Parker, S., Tong, T., Bolden, S., and Wingo, P. Cancer statistics,
1997. CA Cancer i. Clin., 47: 5-27, 1997.
19. Prostate Cancer Trialists Collaborative Group. Maximum androgenblockade in advanced prostate cancer: an overview of 22 randomisedtrials with 3283 deaths in 5710 patients. Lancet, 346: 265-269, 1995.
20. Hudes, G., Nathan, F., Khater, C., Greenberg, R., Gomella, L.,
Stern, C., and McAleer, C. Pachitaxel plus estramustine in metastatichormone-refractory prostate cancer. Semin. Oncol., 22: 41-45, 1995.
21. Petrylak, D., Shelton, G., Judge, T., O’Connor, J., and MacArthur,R. B. Phase I trial of docetaxel + estramustine in androgen insensitive
prostate cancer. Proc. ASCO, 319a, 1997.
22. Tannock, I., Osoba, D., Stockier, M., Ernest, D., Neville, A.,Moore, M., Armitage, G., Wilson, I., Venner, P., Coppin, C., andMurphy, K. Chemotherapy with mitoxantrone plus prednisone or pred-
nisone alone for symptomatic hormone-resistant prostate cancer: a Ca-nadian randomized trial with palliative endpoints. i. Clin. Oncol., 14:
1756-1764, 1996.
23. Apakama, 1., Robinson, M., Walter, N., Charlton, R., Royds, J.,
Fuller, C., Neal, D., and Hamdy, F. Bcl-2 overexpression combined withp53 protein accumulation correlates with hormone-refractory prostatecancer. Br. J. Cancer, 8: 1258-1262, 1996.
24. Danesi, R., Figg, W., Reed, E., and Myers, C. Paclitaxel (Taxol)inhibits protein isoprenylation and induces apoptosis in PC-3 humanprostate cancer cells. Mo!. Pharmacol., 47: 1 106-1 1 1 1, 1995.
25. Haldar, S., Chintapalli, J., and Croce, C. Taxol induces bcl-2
phosphorylation and death of prostate cancer cells. Cancer Res., 56:
1253-1225, 1996.
26. Liu, Q-Y., and Stein, C. Taxol and estramustine-induced modula-tion of human prostate cancer cell apoptosis via alteration in bcl-xL andbak expression. Clin. Cancer Res., 3: 2039-2046, 1997.
27. Rokhlin, 0., Bishop, G., Hostager, B., Waldschmidt, T., Sidorenko,
S., Pavloff, N., Kiefer, M., Umansky, S., Glover, R., and Cohen, M.Fas-mediated apoptosis in human prostatic carcinoma cell lines. CancerRes., 57: 1758-1768, 1997.
28. Hermann, M., Lorenz, H. M., Voll, R., Grunke, M., Woith, W., and
Kalden, J. R. A rapid and simple method for the isolation of apoptoticDNA fragments. Nucleic Acids Res., 22: 5506-5607, 1994.
29. Itoh, N., Yonehara, S., Ishii, A., Yonehara, M., Mizushima, S.,Sameshima, M., Hase, A., Seto, Y., and Nagata, S. The polypeptide
encoded by the cDNA for human cell surface antigen fas can mediateapoptosis. Cell, 66: 233-243, 1991.
30. Lokeshwar, B., Selzer, M., Block, N., and Gunja-Smith, Z. Secre-tion of matrix metalloproteinases and their inhibitors (tissue inhibitor of
metalloproteinases) by human prostate in explant cultures: reducedtissue inhibitor of metalloproteinase secretion by malignant tissues.
Cancer Res., 55: 4489-4498, 1995.
31. Sass, P., Walker, E., Hahne, M., Quiquerez, A., Schnuriger. V..Penn, G., French, L., van Meir, E., de Tribolet, N., Tschopp, J., andDietrich, P. Fas ligand expression by astrocytoma in vivo: maintaining
immune privilege in the brain? I. Chin. Investig., 99: 1 173-1 178, 1997.
32. Villunger, A., Egle, A., Marschitz, I., Kos, M., Bock, G., Ludwig,H., Geley, S., Kofler, R., and Greil, R. Constitutive expression of Fas(Apo-l/CD9S) ligand on multiple myeloma cells: a potential mechanismof tumor-induced suppression of immune surveillance. Blood, 90: 12-
20, 1997.
33. Kelly, R. Immunosuppressive mechanisms in semen: implications
for contraception. Hum. Reprod., 10: 1686-1693, 1995.
34. Jachimczak, P., Bogdahn, U., Schneider, J., BehI, C.,
Meixensberger, I., Apfel, R., Domes, R., Schlingensiepen, K., and
Brysch, W. The effect of transforming growth factor-�32-specific phos-
phorothioate-anti-sense oligodeoxynucleotides in reversing cellular im-
munosuppression in malignant glioma. J. Neurosurg., 78: 944-951,
1993.
35. Friesen, C., Herr, I., Krammer, P., and Debatin, K. Involvement ofthe CD9S (APO-l/Fas) receptor/ligand system in drug-induced apopto-sis in leukemia cells. Nat. Med., 2: 574-577, 1997.
36. Owen-Schaub, L., Zhang, W., Cusack, J., Angelo, L., Santee, S.,Fujiwara, T., Roth, J., Deisseroth, A., Zhang, W., Kruzel, E., and
Radinsky, R. Wild type human p53 and a temperature sensitive mutant
induce FAS/APO-l expression. Mol. Cell. Biol., 15: 3032-3040, 1995.
37. Doroshow, J. Anthracyclines. In: B. Chabner and D. Longo (eds.),Cancer Chemotherapy and Biotherapy, 2nd ed., pp. 409-434. Philadel-phia: Lippincott-Raven, 1996.
38. Carroll, A. G., Voeller, H. I., Sugars, L., and Gelmann, E. P. p53
oncogene mutations in three human prostate cancer cell lines. Prostate,
23: 123-134, 1993.
39. Egle, A., Villunger, A., Marschitz, I., Kos, M., Hittmair, A., Lukas,P., Grunewald, K., and Greil, R. Expression of Apo-lfFas (CD95),
Bcl-2, Bax and Bcl-x in myeloma cell lines: relationship betweenresponsiveness to anti-Fas mAb and p53 functional status. Br. J. Haema-tol.,97: 418-428, 1997.
40. iaattela, M., Benedict, M., Tewari, M., Shayman, J., and Dixit, V.
Bcl-x and bcl-2 inhibit TNF and Fas-induced apoptosis and activation ofphospholipase A2 in breast carcinoma cells. Oncogene, 10: 2297-2305,
1995, 1995.
Research. on May 29, 2021. © 1998 American Association for Cancerclincancerres.aacrjournals.org Downloaded from
1998;4:1803-1811. Clin Cancer Res Q Y Liu, M A Rubin, C Omene, et al. vitro.Fas ligand is constitutively secreted by prostate cancer cells in
Updated version
http://clincancerres.aacrjournals.org/content/4/7/1803
Access the most recent version of this article at:
E-mail alerts related to this article or journal.Sign up to receive free email-alerts
Subscriptions
Reprints and
To order reprints of this article or to subscribe to the journal, contact the AACR Publications
Permissions
Rightslink site. Click on "Request Permissions" which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center's (CCC)
.http://clincancerres.aacrjournals.org/content/4/7/1803To request permission to re-use all or part of this article, use this link
Research. on May 29, 2021. © 1998 American Association for Cancerclincancerres.aacrjournals.org Downloaded from