Date post: | 28-Mar-2015 |
Category: |
Documents |
Upload: | steven-schultz |
View: | 215 times |
Download: | 0 times |
FASD Barnsley Oct 11
Dr Raja MukherjeeConsultant Psychiatrist / Honorary Senior LecturerLead Clinician FASD Behavioural ClinicSurrey and Borders Partnership NHS trust/ St George's university of London
Diagnostic Terms1.Fetal Alcohol Syndrome : Confirmed alcohol exposure :•Alcohol Exposure
•Facial pattern of Short palpebral fissures < / = 10 percentile, Thin upper lip vermillion, Smooth philtrum•Evidence of pre / postnatal growth retardation•Evidence of Neurocognitive deficits
2Fetal Alcohol Syndrome: No confirmed alcohol exposure•As above but no alcohol exposure found
3Partial Fetal Alcohol syndrome: Confirmed Alcohol Exposure•Not all of the above features are present but neurocognitive and some facial features needed
4Alcohol Related Birth Defect (ARBD)•Confirmed maternal alcohol consumption as well as some but not all of the facial features are present however the behavioural features or structural abnormalities are more pronounced.
5Alcohol Related Neurodevelopmental Disorder (ARND) •Confirmed maternal alcohol consumption with the absence of growth retardation or facial features and with the neurocognitive features being prominent.
6 Fetal Alcohol Spectrum Disorders•Umbrella term. Not a diagnostic term
Other Terms to be discussed later
Summary of diagnostic categies and methods. (Stratton 1996 Hoyme 2005).
Alcohol as a Teratogen
How genetics works
Genes
Amino - Acids
Proteins
Organs
Abnormal genetics
Genes Faulty
Amino – Acids coded incorrectly
Incorrect Proteins
OrgansMalformed
How a Teratogen has effect
Genes
Amino - Acids
Abnormal Proteins
Teratogen e.g. Alcohol
Epigenetics
• The study of heritable changes in gene function not controlled by changes in the DNA sequence. Epigenetic phenomena play a significant role in development and evolution, and include histone modifications and DNA methylation
Example of epigenetic in action in genetically identical mice using the 'agouti
viable yellow', or Avy • Avy gene has little or no
methylation, then it is active in all cells, and the mouse is yellow
• Avy is highly methylated, it switches off throughout the entire body. This means the mouse is a sooty-brown colour
• In between these two extremes, Avy can be methylated to varying degrees
Incidence and risk
Examples of recent prevalence studies using the same methodology
Prevalence Rates /1000 population
FAS PFAS FASD
S AfricaWestern
cape 2002
59.2 78.6
Italy 2006 6.2 28.0 35.2
Croatia 2010 6.4 34.3 40.8
Rates
• Figure as high as 3.5 % has been quoted in research (may 2006)
• We don’t know what is the UK figure• Percentage drinking during pregnancy
– 61% DOH– 57% IFS
Rates• International prevalence
– 1/1000 FAS– 9.1 / 1000 FASD (O’Leary 2003)– 1-2 / 100 FASD ( University of Washington 2004)
• This figure is changing• Figure as high as 3.5 % has been quoted in
research (may 2006)• We don’t know what is the UK figure• Percentage drinking during pregnancy
– 61% DOH– 57% IFS
Risk by drinking group
Level of Alcohol Consumption Number of Women in group
(Millions)
Is this true level What should we expect?
Note of caution this is assumption and not known
Nil 3.1 0
Low occasional 14.2 Few not as many as figures quoted
Above recommend levels 2.6 Possible more but probably not at levels quoted
Binge 1.9 Unknown but regular binge drinking high risk and probably
higher than figures quoted
Moderate – heavy 2.5 Probably higher than figures quoted
Heavy 0.6 Higher than figures quoted
Totals 24.9
FASD Risk 1/ 100 or FAS 1./1000
Relationships
Full FAS
ARND
No identifiableProblem
How it presents
Mukherjee et al JRSM 2006Gray and Mukherjee JMHLD 2007
Reasons for referral
• Growth problems• Behavioural issues• Learning issues• Physical problems
What do people knowMukherjee, Wray, Hollins, Curfs
Themes
• Lack of knowledge• Need for consistent guidance/ Cynicism• Need for education• Lack of support services
Professional AttitudesDo you feel you have been generally provided with enough
information to acquire knowledge for yourself? (N = 427)
Yes
No/ Don't know
N Valid %
Yes 176 41.2%
No/ Don’t know 251 58.8%
Professional Attitudes
Do you feel you have been generally provided with enough information to advise pregnant mothers safely? (N = 417)
Yes
No/ Don't know
N Valid %
Yes 115 27.6%
No/ Don’t know 302 72.4%
Diagnosis
Facial features
Small headSmall head
Small noseSmall nose
Small midfaceSmall midface
Long philtrum; Long philtrum; Thin upper lipThin upper lip
normalnormalalcohol-exposedalcohol-exposed
MouseMouse fetusesfetuses
Comparison: Child with Comparison: Child with FAS and mouse fetus with FAS and mouse fetus with
fetal alcohol exposurefetal alcohol exposure
Child with FASChild with FAS
Short palpebral fissuresShort palpebral fissures
*
Critical periods and facial features
Modified from Sulik et al.
Normal Alc–Day 7Alc–Day 8
Fetus
Neonate
Slides Courtesy of Professor E Riley University of San Diego
Methods of Diagnosis of facial abnormalities: note all of these require careful history taking and evidence of growth retardation to make the
diagnosis (Chudley 2005)
• Gestalt: Facial pattern recognition requires experience and clear history. Issues of accuracy and inconsistency often found
• D Score method: computational method for facial pattern based on careful measurements of abnormalities: requires a high degree of training and skill restricting practice to a few.
• 4 Digit scoring method and Facial photographic recognition software: applies areas of history and facial recognition to four 4-point likhert scales to establish diagnosis. Requires minimal training and can be used easily by all in clinical settings.
Comparison between diagnostic ToolsCDC IOM revised Canadian 4 Digit
Face 10th percentile
PFL and rank 4/5 on lip philtrum
10th percentile PFL and rank 4/5 on lip philtrum
3rd percentile PFL and rank 4/5 on lip philtrum
3rd percentile PFL and rank 4/5 on lip philtrum
Growth Pre / post natal growth below 10th percentile
Pre / post natal growth below 10th percentile
Pre / post natal growth below 10th percentile
Pre / post natal growth below 10th percentile
Neurological 1 out of several brain parameters including OFC <10 %, CNS deficits
1 out of l brain parameters including OFC <10 %, CNS deficits
Or abnormal structure
3+ soft hard neurological signs
1 out of several brain parameters including OFC <3 %, CNS deficits
Alcohol Confirmed or unknown
Confirmed to be excessive or unknown
Confirmed or unknown
Confirmed or unknown
Screening tool Designed and used by Raja Mukherjee
Tools to help identify drinking behaviours
• First Things First– Ethical considerations
• History and rapport• Screening tools
– MAST– Audit-C– TACE– TWEAK
• Biomarkers– Meconium FFA– Hair Sample / Urine
analysis– Blood Test
4 Digit Diagnostic Code
• Astley and Clarren 96,00,02• 4 broad categories
– Growth– Facial features– Brain– Alcohol exposure
• Based on defined criteria giving score each areas and then diagnosis
• 26 Categories• Static encephalopathy • A,B,C,E,F, (G,H) relate to FASD diagnoses
• Caution (requires modification of Alcohol scoring)
4- Digit Score and Photographic Software
• She hates me for This!!!
• Forgave me after getting
some flowers!
4- Digit Score and Photographic Software
• Known marker for pixel length
• Allows Calculation of perameters
4- Digit Score and Photographic Software
• Known marker for pixel length• Allows Calculation of perameters• More objective way of
discrimination
4- Digit Score and Photographic Software
Lip Philtrum Guide from 4 Digit Score Schedule : Astley and Clarren University of Seattle
4- Digit Score and Photographic Software
• Known marker for pixel length
• Allows Calculation of perameters
• More objective way of discrimination
• Still some subjectivity• Gives a range of Scores• Combined with other
parameters leads to overall score
• My Wife’s Score : 1212 : P– No Physical or CNS
abnormalities
FAS Child 12
ARND Child 15
FAS or not? Case 1
FAS or not? Case 2
? Who was exposed to more alcohol case 1 or 2
Cause or Effect?
Top down or bottom up ?
Bottom Up: Aetiology
Top Down: Phemomenology
Cluster of SymptomsInattention
Hyperactivity
Poor social understanding
Impulsivity
obsessionality
Tics
Poor Planning
Cognitive flexibility problems
Working Memory deficits
Receptive language deficits
Expressive language deficits
Poor imagination
Cluster of Symptoms: ADHD
Poor social understanding
obsessionality
TicsPoor Planning
Cognitive flexibility problems
Working Memory deficits
Receptive language deficits
Expressive language deficits
Poor imagination
Inattention
Hyperactivity
Impulsivity
Cluster of Symptoms: ASD
Inattention
Hyperactivity
Poor social understanding
Impulsivity
obsessionality
Tics
Poor Planning
Cognitive flexibility problems
Working Memory deficits
Receptive language deficits
Expressive language deficits
Poor imagination
Cluster of Symptoms: ASD / ADHD
Inattention Hyperactivity
Poor social understanding
Impulsivityobsessionality
Tics
Poor Planning
Cognitive flexibility problems
Working Memory deficits
Receptive language deficits
Expressive language deficits
Poor imagination
Cluster of Symptoms: FASD
InattentionHyperactivity Poor social understanding
Impulsivity
obsessionality
Tics
Poor Planning
Cognitive flexibility problems
Working Memory deficits
Receptive language deficits
Expressive language deficits
Poor imagination
Characteristic vs. Discriminating symptoms3 Disorders with overlapping symptoms
C
C
DD
C = Characteristic: D= Discriminating
D
What is so important about an S?
• Fetal alcohol spectrum Disorder– Unitary diagnosis– Separate from others
• Fetal Alcohol Spectrum disorders : note the S!!– An umbrella term– Donates the range of conditions that can be encompassed by the
effects of alcohol in utero – Becomes a teratogenic aetiological factor causing phenomenological
outcomes– Not mutually exclusive from current diagnostic criteria
Aetiology Vs Phenomenology
Poor social understanding
Receptive language deficits
Expressive language deficits
Poor imagination
FASD Fragile X NoonansDowns
Common Ground
Inattention
Hyperactivity
Poor social understanding
Impulsivity
obsessionality
Tics
Poor Planning
Cognitive flexibility problems
Poor imagination
Pre FrontalCortex
Damage
FASD
Fragile X
Noonans
Downs
Relationships
Full FAS
ARND
No identifiableProblem
ADHDASD
Mental health problems
DC- LD• Developed Faculty of Learning
Disability Psychiatry 2001• Multiaxial• 1Severity of LD• 2Cause of LD• 3Psychiatric Disorders
– A Developmental disorders– B Psychiatric illness– C Personality Disorders– D Problem Behaviours– E Other Disorders
Multi axial way of thinking!
Symptoms e .g. Autism Depression
Aetiology e.g. FASD
Level of Functioning
16
11
4
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
ICD10 F84.0 Childhood Autism Gilberg Aspergers Criteria 2001 No ASD
F84.0 = 76.2%
No ASD = 19.0
Type of Social Impairment
:From DISCO scoring
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
Active but odd
Passive
Aloof
Other
FASPartial FASARNDNo FASCombined
Bishop et al: FASD group more likelyto initiate social contact
Possible correlation with IQ level p=0.005
Management approaches based on pulling all what has been learnt together
What does it all mean to me?
Impulsivity / Distractibility
11
9
1
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
DSM IV 314.01ADHD Combined
DSM IV 314.00ADHD Inattentive
Type
Did not meet criteria
No Clear statistical link with the Small numbers between Diagnosis
•Age•IQ•Sex
Ranking of most difficult behaviours with score of 1.5 Mean on DBC
DBC Parameter Mean Score
Easily Distracted 1.95
Over excited 1.86
Impulsive 1.81
Problems with feelings 1.77
Poor sense of danger 1.76
Easily Led 1.75
Poor attention span 1.71
Temper Tantrums 1.70
Impatient 1.65
Irritable 1.61
Tells Lies 1.52
Does not mix with own peer group 1.50
Attention seeking 1.50
Single item analysis of ADHD diagnostic criteria: inattentive symptoms
Percentage of Group meeting Criteria (n) Total in group (21)
Not pay attention 81 (17)
Fail to stick at task 76.2 (16)
Not listen when spoken to 81 (17)
Fail to Finish an instruction 95.2 (20)
Difficulties planning 90.5 (19)
Avoid areas find difficult 90.5 (19)
Loose things needed for task 85.7 (18)
Easily distracted 100 (21)
Forgetful 90.5 (19)
Lobe Analysis
Frontal Temporal Parietal Occipital0
30000
60000
90000
120000
150000
Vol
ume
Lobe
Controls
FASp = .0003
p = .018
p = .030
p = .0002
* Slides Courtesy of Professor E Riley University of San Diego
Cerebrum
CerebellumCorpus Callosum
Cerebellum
75
80
85
90
95
100
NDFASD
FAS
<p 0.001
Mattson et al., 1994
Change in cerebellum size
* Slides Courtesy of Professor E Riley University of San Diego
Summary of other research in this area
• People with FASD is worse in the visual modality than the auditory. Coles 2002
• Executive function in deficit in people with FASD Rasmussen 2005
– Not simply related to IQ– Not related to dysmorphology
• Relationship between frontal brain size and maternal alcohol consumption Wass et al 2001, Persutte 2000
• Executive functioning not reflective of IQ Connor 2000
Executive control of Schemas
Norman and Shallice 86
Activating Impulse
Orange
Action
Peel Orange
Executive control
Schema
Peel orangeschema
Supervisory Attention System = EC
Hungry
Executive control of Schemas
Norman and Shallice 86
Activating Impulse
Orange
Action
Peel Orange
Executive control
Schema
Peel orangeschema
Not Hungry
Executive control of Schemas
Norman and Shallice 86
Activating Impulse
Orange
Action
Peel Orange
Executive control
Schema
Peel orangeschema
Not Hungry
Decision making
Ranking of most difficult behaviours with score of 1.5 Mean on DBC
DBC Parameter Mean Score
Easily Distracted 1.95
Over excited 1.86
Impulsive 1.81
Problems with feelings 1.77
Poor sense of danger 1.76
Easily Led 1.75
Poor attention span 1.71
Temper Tantrums 1.70
Impatient 1.65
Irritable 1.61
Tells Lies 1.52
Does not mix with own peer group 1.50
Attention seeking 1.50
Active Memory Model
CentralExecutive
Visual spatialActive memory
Semantic activememory
Phonological Active memory
Stored visual spatial information
Stored semantic information
Stored phonological information
Long term memory store
Model of relationship between Working memory, Consolidation system and long term memory
Consolidation system
Working MemoryLong Term
Memory Store
Hippocampal Circuit
Entorhinal Cortex ->
Dentate Gyrus ->
CA3 ->
CA1 ->
Subiculum ->
Fimbria ->
Fornix
Examples of other research in this area
• Immediate memory worse than long term memory Mattson 2002
• Working memory and effects on attention affected by alcohol Burden 2005
• GABAa receptors affected by alcohol more likely to be linked to deficits with memory Gibbs 2005
• Linked to Executive deficits already shown
The frontal lobes, making logical decisions
Frontal Cortex
Striatum(caudate & putamen)
Globus Pallidus(part of lenticular nucleus)
Thalamus
Caudate *Accumbens *
70
75
80
85
90
95
100
NDFASD
FAS***
*
Concordant with animal data
Slides Courtesy of Professor E Riley University of San Diego
White versus gray matter
• What is Myelin?– Clinically delayed myelination it has
been observed – Riikonen et al., 1999
– alcohol-induced delayed myelination are due to the delayed expression of myelin basic protein (MBP) and transferrin
– Ozer et al., 2000
Slides Courtesy of Professor E Riley University of San Diego
Summary of other research in this area
• Prenatal alcohol linked to slower processing speed Burden 2005b
• Trade off between speed and accuracy Sampson 1997
• Problems passing information between hemispheres Roebuck 2002
A possible model of Executive function integration
Anterior CingulateInitiating and
focusing attention
Motivating
Reward
behaviour
Medial
Inhibiting Unwanted behaviour
Lateral
Orbito Frontal Cortex
DorsolateralPre frontal
Cortex
SelectingAnd
MonitoringDirectoryschemas
Motor Response
Stepping on Brake initiated,Stepping on accelerator inhibited
Posterior
Association Areas
Knowledge and action Schemas
Time 1Green light
Time 2ChildCrossing
How the brain organises information
AAAA
DDDD
BBBB
EEEE
CCCC
How the brain organises information
AAAA
DDDD
BBBB
EEEE
CCCC
Executive Control monitors locates and plans activities
How the brain organises information
AAAADDDD
BBBB
EEEECCCC
Executive Control monitors locates and plans activities
How the brain organises information
AAAA BBBB
CCCC
Executive Control monitors locates and plans activities
How to cross a road
Pedestrian crossing
Cars can kill
Source Monitoring
Individual learns where something is and stores information how items linked
AAAA BBBB
When asked to recall information the source of the learning is muddled
AAAA BBBB
How the brain organises information : External
Support
BBBB
Executive Control monitors locates and plans activities
How to cross a roadAAAA
Pedestrian crossing
CCCCCars can kill
Ways of overcoming memory deficts
•Structure and routine
•Repetition
•Not expecting people to learn quickly and changing your not their experiences
•Concrete tasks avoiding ambiguity
Mental Health
Rates of Autism in other conditions
020406080
FASD
RM
FASD
Bishop
FASD
Langdre
n
Fragil
e X
Downs Syn
drome
Cornelia
de lange
Behavioural phenotype
Behaviouralphenotype
Type of Social Impairment
:From DISCO scoring
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
Active but odd
Passive
Aloof
Other
FASPartial FASARNDNo FASCombined
Bishop et al: FASD group more likelyto initiate social contact
Possible correlation with IQ level p=0.005
Vineland adaptive behaviour schedule: adaptive age scores (n=19) (2 not returned)
DomainDomain MinimumMinimum MaximumMaximum AverageAverage
Age 6.10 16.00 9.93 (95%CI)
Receptive language 1.1 5.6 3.12 (2.56-3.67)
Expressive language
2.2 13.0 5.23 (3.99-6.46)
Written Language 4.5 14.0 8.73(7.37 – 10.09)
Personal Daily living Skills
2.3 8.6 5.62 (4.54-6.69)
Domestic Daily living skills
1.1 11 5.61(4.33-6.90)
Community skills 3.6 10.6 6.27 (5.30 – 7.24)
Interpersonal skills 0.11 10.0 4.2 (3.05 -5.37)
Play/ leisure socialisation
1.0 8.0 4.56 (3.56 – 5.56)
Coping 1.6 9.6 3.99 (3.11 -4.86)
Secondary Disabilities
Disability %
Psychiatric problem 90
Disrupted School experience
60
Trouble with the law 60
Confinement 50
Inappropriate sexual behaviour
50
Alcohol /Drug problems
30
Streissguth et al 1996, 2000
Frequency as a % of Psychiatric Diagnoses seen in cohorts of people
with FASD Famy 1997 (n=23) Barr 2006 (n=136?)
Total 92Alcohol / Drug Dependence
60 53.5
Major Depression 44 47.9Psychotic Disorder 40 1.4Bipolar 1 20 2.8Anxiety disorder 20 33.8Eating Disorder 16 4.2PD 48
Where can I go for help?
Referral pathways
• Clinical Genetics (diagnosis only)• FASD Specialist (very few around)• Paediatrician• Child psychiatry• Child Psychology• Adult Psychiatry• LD Psychiatry
Often need toSpecify suspecteddiagnosis
FASD Clinic
SPECIALST FETAL ALCOHOL SPECTRUM DISORDER CLINIC
Information leaflets and referral process available
Second European Conference on FASD
Fetal Alcohol Spectrum Disorder: Clinical and Biochemical Diagnosis, Screening and Follow-up
Barcelona 21-24 October 2012
Venue: Barcelona Biomedical Research Park, PRBBAv. Dr. Aiguader 88, 08003 Barcelona, SPAINwww.prbb.org
Questions
SAVE THE DATE – 13th & 14th October 2011
Launch of UK Professionals Forum on FASD
(Foetal Alcohol Spectrum Disorders)
Practical guide for those who want to know what to do