37 Offices in 18 Countries
Faster Patents –Strategies for ExpeditingIssuance of UnitedStates Patents
Django AndrewsJuly 25, 2012
3
Overview
1. Case for expedited examination
a. USPTO Statistics
b. Examination overview
2. Available programs for expediting examination
a. Special application programs
i. Age/Health of Inventor
ii. Special Technology
b. Additional documentation or fee programs
i. Accelerated Examination
ii. Track 1 Examination
c. Prior examination programs
i. Patent Prosecution Highway Programs
3. Conclusions
5
Motivation for Faster Patent Rights
• Known competitor infringing activity
• Product launch
• Anticipated litigation
• Increase valuation
Investment
Merger / Sale
• Participate in standard setting
6
USPTO Average Pendency Statistics
• Original application, 33.6 mo.
Varies by technology area
– Semiconductors, 30 mo.
– Computer Architecture / Communications, 40 mo.
• Original application with RCE, 62.3 mo.
• Continuation application, 76.5 mo.
• Divisional application, 79 mo.
• Appeal, > 85.5 mo.
7
Examination Procedure
Regular Docket
• 14 mo. to first Office Action
• 4 mo. to issue subsequent office actions
• 3 years to issue
• No time frame for “final” disposition
Final Office Action
Allowance
• No guarantee Office will meet these deadlines (often do not)
• Results in the pendency above
Special Docket
• Applications examined out of turn
• Can result in significantly expedited prosecution
9
Categories
SpecialApplications
AdditionalDocumentation
or Fees
PriorExamination
• Inventor Age
• Inventor Health
• Technology*
• Track 1Examination
• AcceleratedExamination
• Foreign PatentOffice
• InternationalPhase*None currently
11
Special Applications
Age or Health of Inventor
• At least one inventor over 65 or health which indicates would notbe able to participate in entirety of prosecution
• Requires evidence of age or statement from physician
• No fees
• Can redact age evidence and medical statement
Technology-Based
• All existing programs now require submission under AcceleratedExamination Procedures
environmental quality, energy, or counter-terrorism
• Past pilot programs have not been renewed
Green technology program ended in FY 2010
• Possibility of more pilot programs in the future
Strategic Considerations:
Health information of inventor likely to be very sensitive
Accelerated Examination requirements are onerous
13
Additional Documentation or Fee Programs
Accelerated Examination
Significant petition documentation
Track 1 Examination
Pay a fee
15
Accelerated Examination
Requirements
• Original application (no PCT)
• File complete application electronically
Specification, claims, drawings, oath/declaration, all fees
• No more than 3 independent and 20 total claims
• Single invention (cannot argue against restriction requirement)
• Petition form and fee ($120.00)
• Examiner-requested interview
• Pre-examination search
Essentially same search as USPTO would conduct
Submit search documentation
• Accelerated Examination Support Document
Provide reasoning why claims are:
– Patent-eligible subject matter (101)
– Supported by specification and drawings (112)
– Novel and non-obvious over all search references
16
Accelerated Examination (Cont.)
Procedure
• Application goes to front of Examiner’s queue
• First action contains all issues relating to patentability
• Must reply to first action within one month
• Next action will be Final or Notice of Allowance
Strategic Considerations:
Significant attorney cost
Additional admissions and characterizations on the record
82% have been granted as of April 2012
18
Prioritized (Track 1) Examination
Requirements
• Original, continuing, or RCE application
• Timing
Original and continuing applications: upon filing
RCE application: before first action
• File complete application electronically
Specification, claims, drawings, oath/declaration, all fees
• No more than 4 independent and 30 total claims
• No multiply dependent claims
• Additional examination fee ($4,800), processing fee ($130),and early publication fee ($300)
• Maximum 2 prioritized examination requests per application
1 on filing and 1 with RCE
• Limit to 10,000 petitions for prioritized examination per fiscalyear
3673 filed through June 18, 2012
19
Prioritized (Track 1) Examination (Cont.)
Examination
• Special docket throughout examination
• Provide “final” disposition 12 months after special status granted
on average
• Final disposition includes:
Final Office Action
Notice of Allowance
Notice of Appeal
RCE filing
Abandonment
• Normal response periods
• No extensions of time
Strategic Considerations:
Cost
85% grant rate as of June 2012
37 Offices in 18 Countries
Prior Examination by PCT or ForeignPatent Office
Patent Prosecution Highway Overview
21
Patent Prosecution Highway
Overview
• Leverage successful prosecution in International Phase or byforeign patent office to expedite prosecution in U.S.
• Series of agreements have created many permanent and pilotprograms
Permanent Bilateral Programs
Bilateral Pilot Programs
Bilateral PCT Pilot Programs
PPH 2.0 Program
• U.S. PPH applications have an 87% grant rate compared to49% grant rate for non-PPH applications
22
Patent Prosecution Highway (Cont.)
General Program Requirements
• Claims allowed in foreign patent office (or PCT) are substantiallythe same as claims pending in U.S.
• U.S. and foreign applications must share a priority document
• U.S. examination has not begun
• Submit claims correspondence table
• File request
• No Fees due
• Information Disclosure Statement and References
Unless previously submitted
• Electronic submission
• Provisional applications, plant applications, design applications,reissue applications and applications subject to a secrecy orderare not eligible
23
Patent Prosecution Highway (Cont.)
Additional Program Requirements
Requirement PPH 1.0 PCT-PPH PPH 2.0
Copy ofAllowableClaim(s)
Yes Yes No
Copy of OfficeActions
Yes Yes Yes
Translation* Yes Yes No
TranslationStatement
Yes Yes No
*Can be machine translation
24
Patent Prosecution Highway (Cont.)
PPH Program Examination Procedure
• Application granted special status
Lower priority than Accelerated Examination and Track 1 Examination
• U.S. claims must correspond to allowed foreign or PCT claims atall times
Any claim amendments during prosecution require correspondence
table and statement
• All subsequent foreign Office Actions (with translation) must besubmitted to USPTO
25
Patent Prosecution Highway (Cont.)
PPH Programs
Permanent Bilateral Programs
– Canada
– Hungary
– Israel
– Japan
– Korea
Bilateral Pilot Programs
– Austria (on-going)
– China (set to expire November 30, 2012)
– Denmark (on-going)
– European Patent Office (set to expire January 29, 2013)
– Finland (set to expire January 29, 2013)
– Germany (set to expire April 26, 2013)
– Iceland (set to expire November 30, 2012)
– Mexico (set to expire August 31, 2012)
– Norway (set to expire October 31, 2012)
– Singapore (on-going)
– Taiwan (set to expire August 31, 2012)
26
Patent Prosecution Highway (Cont.)
PPH Programs (Cont.)
PPH-PCT Programs
– Australia (on-going pilot)
– Austria (on-going pilot)
– China (set to expire November 30, 2012)
– European Patent Office (set to expire January 28, 2014)
– Finland (set to expire January 23, 2013)
– Japan (set to expire January 28, 2014)
– Korea (permanent)
– Russia (on-going pilot)
– Spain (set to expire September 30, 2013)
– Sweden (set to expire May 31, 2013)
PPH 2.0 Pilot Program
– Multilateral
– Australia, Canada, European Patent Office, Finland, Japan, Russia, Spain,U.K.
– Runs until January 29, 2013
27
Patent Prosecution Highway (Cont.)
Example 1: Corresponding Korean* Application Allowed
File PCTApplication
File KoreanNational stage
at 15 mo.
File USNational
Stage at 30mo.
RequestExamination
at 18 mo.
AllowedClaims at 40
mo.
PPH Requestat 41mo.
*Average pendency of Korean patent applications is 24.6 mo.
28
Patent Prosecution Highway (Cont.)
Example 2: Corresponding PCT Application Receives FavorableWritten Opinion from EPO Acting as ISA
File PCTApplication
FavorableWritten Opinion*from EPO as ISA
at 16mo.
File US NationalStage at 17 mo.
with PPH Request
*Could also be favorable IPRP
30
Conclusions
1. Special Applications
a. Take advantage of age of inventor program
i. Consider health of inventor program
b. Watch/lobby for technology-based programs
2. Accelerated Examination
a. Use with caution
3. Track 1 Examination
a. Consider for high-priority inventions
4. Patent Prosecution Highway Programs
a. Require planning for best strategic use
b. Consider at portfolio level
c. Can accelerate foreign prosecution as well