+ All Categories
Home > Documents > F.B. McDonald 1 , W.R. Webber 2 , E.C. Stone 3 , A.C. Cummings 3 , B.C. Heikkila 4 , N. Lal 4

F.B. McDonald 1 , W.R. Webber 2 , E.C. Stone 3 , A.C. Cummings 3 , B.C. Heikkila 4 , N. Lal 4

Date post: 13-Jan-2016
Category:
Upload: tad
View: 25 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend
Description:
Voyager Observations of Galactic Cosmic Ray Transport in the Heliosheath and their Reacceleration at the Termination Shock. F.B. McDonald 1 , W.R. Webber 2 , E.C. Stone 3 , A.C. Cummings 3 , B.C. Heikkila 4 , N. Lal 4 - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Popular Tags:
25
Voyager Observations of Galactic Cosmic Ray Transport in the Heliosheath and their Reacceleration at the Termination Shock F.B. McDonald 1 , W.R. Webber 2 , E.C. Stone 3 , A.C. Cummings 3 , B.C. Heikkila 4 , N. Lal 4 1 Institute for Physical Science and Technology, Univ. of Maryland, College Park, MD, USA 2 Dept. of Physics and Astronomy, New Mexico State Univ., Las Cruces, New Mexico, USA 3 California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA, USA 4 NASA/Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, MD, USA 2 nd Heliospheric Network Workshop Island of Kefalonia, Greece 6-9 May 2008
Transcript
Page 1: F.B. McDonald 1 , W.R. Webber 2 , E.C. Stone 3 , A.C. Cummings 3 , B.C. Heikkila 4 , N. Lal 4

Voyager Observations of Galactic Cosmic Ray Transport in the Heliosheath and their

Reacceleration at the Termination Shock

F.B. McDonald1, W.R. Webber2, E.C. Stone3, A.C. Cummings3, B.C. Heikkila4, N. Lal4

1 Institute for Physical Science and Technology, Univ. of Maryland, College Park, MD, USA2 Dept. of Physics and Astronomy, New Mexico State Univ., Las Cruces, New Mexico, USA3 California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA, USA4 NASA/Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, MD, USA

2nd Heliospheric Network WorkshopIsland of Kefalonia, Greece

6-9 May 2008

Page 2: F.B. McDonald 1 , W.R. Webber 2 , E.C. Stone 3 , A.C. Cummings 3 , B.C. Heikkila 4 , N. Lal 4

V1 TSX: Dec 16, 2004 (94 AU)Near Solar MaximumMoved 11.6 - ~16 AU beyond TS

V2 TSX: Aug 30, 2007 (83.7 AU)Near Solar Minimum

CRS Exp. Energetic Particle Coverage

H: 1.8-300 MeV He: 1.8-650 MeV/n Z = 1-28 (Resolves Isotopes) E: 2.5 – 140 MeV

INTRODUCTION

28.6 cm

• A Major Task is to Separate Temporal and Spatial Effects

• Very Small GCR Radial Gradients

• 10 MeV Electrons Increasing at ~50%/Year at V1

• Large Increase of 2.5 – 16 MeV Electrons at V2 TSX with Maximum Occurring Beyond the TS.

Page 3: F.B. McDonald 1 , W.R. Webber 2 , E.C. Stone 3 , A.C. Cummings 3 , B.C. Heikkila 4 , N. Lal 4

Low Energy Galactic Cosmic Ray Electrons (2 – 160 MeV)

Page 4: F.B. McDonald 1 , W.R. Webber 2 , E.C. Stone 3 , A.C. Cummings 3 , B.C. Heikkila 4 , N. Lal 4

Low Energy Galactic Cosmic Ray Electrons (2 – 160 MeV)

Origin:

• Directly Accelerated primaries

• Interstellar secondaries from the decay of charged pions

• Knock-on electrons produced by the passage of higher energy cosmic rays through the interstellar medium

 At energies below 200 MeV:

• These electrons are the source of the lower energy diffuse gamma, x-ray and synchrotron radio emission from the galaxy.

• May play a major role in ionizing and heating the interstellar medium. Difficult to observe at 1AU:

• Large Jovian electron intensity

• Strongly modulated

In the heliosheath, their very low rigidity should make them especially sensitive tothe passage of transient disturbances.

Page 5: F.B. McDonald 1 , W.R. Webber 2 , E.C. Stone 3 , A.C. Cummings 3 , B.C. Heikkila 4 , N. Lal 4

Low Energy Galactic Cosmic Ray Electrons (2 – 160 MeV)

Page 6: F.B. McDonald 1 , W.R. Webber 2 , E.C. Stone 3 , A.C. Cummings 3 , B.C. Heikkila 4 , N. Lal 4

Low Energy Galactic Cosmic Ray Electrons (2 – 160 MeV)

Page 7: F.B. McDonald 1 , W.R. Webber 2 , E.C. Stone 3 , A.C. Cummings 3 , B.C. Heikkila 4 , N. Lal 4

Low Energy Galactic Cosmic Ray Electrons (2 – 160 MeV)

Page 8: F.B. McDonald 1 , W.R. Webber 2 , E.C. Stone 3 , A.C. Cummings 3 , B.C. Heikkila 4 , N. Lal 4

Low Energy Galactic Cosmic Ray Electrons (2 – 160 MeV)

Page 9: F.B. McDonald 1 , W.R. Webber 2 , E.C. Stone 3 , A.C. Cummings 3 , B.C. Heikkila 4 , N. Lal 4

Low Energy Galactic Cosmic Ray Electrons (2 – 160 MeV)

Page 10: F.B. McDonald 1 , W.R. Webber 2 , E.C. Stone 3 , A.C. Cummings 3 , B.C. Heikkila 4 , N. Lal 4

Low Energy Galactic Cosmic Ray Electrons (2 – 160 MeV)

• Voyager 2 electron data time shifted so that the time of the TSX coincides with that of Voyager1.

Next Step

• Determine the Voyager 2 electron spectra at the peak following the TSX.

• Determine the radial intensity gradients in the heliosheath using:

i. V12/V2 dataii. V1 data alone

Page 11: F.B. McDonald 1 , W.R. Webber 2 , E.C. Stone 3 , A.C. Cummings 3 , B.C. Heikkila 4 , N. Lal 4

Low Energy Galactic Cosmic Ray Electrons (2 – 160 MeV)

Page 12: F.B. McDonald 1 , W.R. Webber 2 , E.C. Stone 3 , A.C. Cummings 3 , B.C. Heikkila 4 , N. Lal 4

Low Energy Galactic Cosmic Ray Electrons (2 – 160 MeV)

Page 13: F.B. McDonald 1 , W.R. Webber 2 , E.C. Stone 3 , A.C. Cummings 3 , B.C. Heikkila 4 , N. Lal 4

Effect of Transients on GCR electrons in the Heliosheathand in the Foreshock Region

Page 14: F.B. McDonald 1 , W.R. Webber 2 , E.C. Stone 3 , A.C. Cummings 3 , B.C. Heikkila 4 , N. Lal 4

Low Energy Galactic Cosmic Ray Electrons (2 – 160 MeV)

Page 15: F.B. McDonald 1 , W.R. Webber 2 , E.C. Stone 3 , A.C. Cummings 3 , B.C. Heikkila 4 , N. Lal 4

ELECTRON CONCLUSIONS

• Essentially all of the electron modulation in this energy range occurs in the heliosheath

• Large fluctuations in this very low rigidity component reveals a turbulent heliosheath

• Expect electron intensities to continue to increase toward interstellar intensities as V1 approaches the heliopause.

• The large increase in 2.5-14 MeV electrons at V2 near the TS and after the TSX is probably related to their re-acceleration at the TS.

• Both spatial and temporal effects are still important at V1.

Page 16: F.B. McDonald 1 , W.R. Webber 2 , E.C. Stone 3 , A.C. Cummings 3 , B.C. Heikkila 4 , N. Lal 4

MODULATIN SECTION

Page 17: F.B. McDonald 1 , W.R. Webber 2 , E.C. Stone 3 , A.C. Cummings 3 , B.C. Heikkila 4 , N. Lal 4

• Reduction of 150-380 MeV/n GCR He Solar Min to Solar Max in Cycle 23.

IMP8 (1AU) factor of 4.4

V2 (63.5 AU) 33%

V1 (81 AU) 22%

• Essentially all of the modulation associated with the 11 year solar activity cycle occurs in the region of the supersonic solar wind.

The Current State of the Heliosphere as Defined by Galactic Cosmic Rays

Page 18: F.B. McDonald 1 , W.R. Webber 2 , E.C. Stone 3 , A.C. Cummings 3 , B.C. Heikkila 4 , N. Lal 4

COSMIC RAY MODULATION

Page 19: F.B. McDonald 1 , W.R. Webber 2 , E.C. Stone 3 , A.C. Cummings 3 , B.C. Heikkila 4 , N. Lal 4

COSMIC RAY MODULATION

Page 20: F.B. McDonald 1 , W.R. Webber 2 , E.C. Stone 3 , A.C. Cummings 3 , B.C. Heikkila 4 , N. Lal 4

COSMIC RAY MODULATION

Page 21: F.B. McDonald 1 , W.R. Webber 2 , E.C. Stone 3 , A.C. Cummings 3 , B.C. Heikkila 4 , N. Lal 4

COSMIC RAY MODULATION

Page 22: F.B. McDonald 1 , W.R. Webber 2 , E.C. Stone 3 , A.C. Cummings 3 , B.C. Heikkila 4 , N. Lal 4

COSMIC RAY MODULATION

Page 23: F.B. McDonald 1 , W.R. Webber 2 , E.C. Stone 3 , A.C. Cummings 3 , B.C. Heikkila 4 , N. Lal 4

COSMIC RAY MODULATION

Page 24: F.B. McDonald 1 , W.R. Webber 2 , E.C. Stone 3 , A.C. Cummings 3 , B.C. Heikkila 4 , N. Lal 4

COSMIC RAY MODULATION

Page 25: F.B. McDonald 1 , W.R. Webber 2 , E.C. Stone 3 , A.C. Cummings 3 , B.C. Heikkila 4 , N. Lal 4

MODULATION CONCLUSIONS

• Over the 11 year modulation cycle changes in propagation conditions occur mainly between 15AU and the TS.

• Propagation conditions in the inner heliosphere appear to change significantly less from solar minimum to solar maximum than in the outer heliosphere.

• Observations suggest that GCR modulation in the heliosheath has remained essentially constant over cycle 23.

• Based on the latest estimate of the local interstellar galactic cosmic ray intensity (Webber and Lockwood) and a heliosheath thickness of 40 AU, we expect to observe a radial intensity gradient of ~1.7%/AU. The observed gradient is 0.2 ± 0.2 %/AU

• The amount of the modulation of GCR ions in the heliosheath requires a more accurate estimate of the LIS GCR energy spectra.

• V1/V2 265 MeV/n GCR He data is consistent with modest reacceleration at the TS. However, the magnitude of the latitudinal gradients are not known.


Recommended