Date post: | 12-Jan-2016 |
Category: |
Documents |
Upload: | abel-houston |
View: | 221 times |
Download: | 0 times |
Fe-ConE Workshop
Vilnius, LithuaniaOctober 11th, 07
K. Kikis-PapadakisIACM/FORTH
2
3
4
5
Fe-ConE: Framework for e-learning Contents Evaluation
Funded by: The eLearning Programme (Transversal Actions)
Duration: Jan 1st, 2006 – Dec. 31st, 2007 Partnership: IACM/FORTH (GR), IFS (AT), DPPSS
(IT), UITM (PL), Stoas (NL), Florida (ES), VDU (LT) Website:
http://promitheas.iacm.forth.gr/fe-cone/index.html Portal site: http://www.elearningeuropa.info/
community/index.php?page=forumtopic&f=2&t=24 Budget: 290,196 EUR
6
The Fe-ConE WorkshopList of Participants
A. Partners Foundation for Research and Technology-Hellas, Institute of
Applied and Computational Mathematics - FORTH / IACM (GR)
Verein fuer Neues Lehren und Lernen –IFS, Institute for Future Studies (AT)
University of Rome La Sapienza, Dept. of Social and Developmental Psychology (IT)
University of Information Technology and Management in Rzeszow - UITM (PL)
Stoas Intermedia (NL) Florida Universitaria (ES) Department of Education at Vytautas Magnus University (LT)
7
The Fe-ConE WorkshopList of ParticipantsB. CollaboratorsB1. Discourse Facilitators
Mr. Gr. Attwell Ms Cl. Belisle Ms. M. Lakkala
B2. Discourse Participants Mr. M. Vanbuel, BE Ms. N. Staevsky, BG Ms. E. Neocleous CY Mr. J. Bang DK Ms. A. Villems EE Mr. T. Johansson FI Dr. B. Ertl DE Mr. B. Misnevs LV Mr. A. Gambin IT Ms. M. Caruana Dingli MT Mr. A. Duarte PT Mr. T. Amon SI
8
“Learnability is a culturally bounded activity”
Scope: promotion of the elearning notion in Europe consolidation of experiences for empowering the
elearning stakeholders design of instruments (in the form of a
framework) for the e-content designer and decision making tools for the end-user
9
Axes of focus
How elearning contents can be conceptualized given the transformative potentials of ICT in relation to education, training and life long learning?
What are the challenges for designing elearning contents that are inclusive (i.e. bias-free, socio-culturally sensitive, pedagogically flexible, customizable, and accessible)?
What may be the implications in the design, diffusion and adoption of elearning contents when taking into account the commonalities and differences in traditional and emerging learning dispositions across different European education and training systems and lifelong learning practices?
10
11
Research Perspectives
National Cultures Perspectives
Pedagogical Imperialism Perspectives
12
Project Activities
Bibliographical Reviews Project Reviews Reflection Activities Discussion Forum Definition of socio-cultural variables Course Design Course Implementation Definition of Evaluation Framework Analysis of Course Related Data Articulation of Models/Frameworks
Definition of an Evaluation Framework Construction of tools (diagnostic in nature)
13
Workshop
Vilnius, Oct 11, 2007
Networking with Satellites and Experts
14
Aim of the Workshop
Exchange of experiences on elearning and e-contents(from an evaluation point of view)
Definition of Evaluation criteria for inclusive effective elearning/e-contents
Enhancement of Networking
15
Country Representation
Austria Belgium Bulgaria Cyprus Denmark Estonia Finland France Germany Greece Latvia Malta The Netherlands Poland Portugal Slovenia Spain
16
Session organization
General Session
The European elearning Scenery
Evaluation Considerations for e-contents and Future Trends A. Evaluation
B. Future Trends
Lessons Learned from the Implementation of theFe-ConE
Contributors
Dr. Kollias, Mr. Attwell, Ms. Belisle, Ms. Lakkala
Ms. Villems, Ms. Caruana Dingli, Mr. Misnevs, Ms. Staevsky
Ms. Marsh, Mr. Duarte, Mr. Bang,Dr. Ertl, Ms. Lazari
Mr. Johansson, Mr. Amon,Mr. Gambin
Ms. Helling, Mr. Pozzi, Dr. Kollias, Mr. de Leeuwe
17
Preliminary Research Findings
Preliminary Evaluation perspective Evaluation of eLearning and eContents from the
perspective, of
1. The Learner
2. The “Teacher”
3. The Learning environment and didactical design
4. The Content
5. The Technology
6. The Educational System and Society(derived from the review of literature, contributions from the
collaborators and the Fe-ConE’s course)
18
Interaction between the evaluation perspectives
- instruments- research context- results
interaction of “contents” with…
19
A proposal for an Evaluation FrameworkDecision-management oriented approach
20
Axes of focus
How elearning contents can be conceptualized given the transformative potentials of ICT in relation to education, training and life long learning?
What are the challenges for designing elearning contents that are inclusive (i.e. bias-free, socio-culturally sensitive, pedagogically flexible, customizable, and accessible)?
What may be the implications in the design, diffusion and adoption of elearning contents when taking into account the commonalities and differences in traditional and emerging learning dispositions across different European education and training systems and lifelong learning practices?