Date post: | 04-Apr-2018 |
Category: |
Documents |
Upload: | sarah-wissing |
View: | 224 times |
Download: | 0 times |
of 17
7/30/2019 Feasibility Report Presentation
1/17
Discharge
FilingFeasibility
Report
Sarah Wissing
7/30/2019 Feasibility Report Presentation
2/17
Agenda
The Client
The Problem
Solutions
Criteria
Findings
7/30/2019 Feasibility Report Presentation
3/17
Georgia Health Services Network
Medicaid Provider for Personal Care Homes
70 subcontracted Personal Care Homes
300 current clients
500+ discharged clients
7/30/2019 Feasibility Report Presentation
4/17
The Problem
Medicaid requires discharged paperwork to be kept
for 7 years.
Discharge files do not have a functional filing system.
Have exceeded space capacity.
State can audit at any time.
7/30/2019 Feasibility Report Presentation
5/17
Solutions
Option 1: On site storage, no digital backup
Files stored on site in HIPAA approved file cabinets
No digital backup
Employees would access physical files for reference
7/30/2019 Feasibility Report Presentation
6/17
Solutions
Option 2: On site filing, with digital backup
Files stored in boxes in attic with destroy date
Digital file backup from online cloud service
Employees would access digital files for reference
7/30/2019 Feasibility Report Presentation
7/17
Solutions
Option 3: Off site storage, with digital backup
Off Site storage at local self storage unit
Digital file backup from online cloud service
Employees would access digital files for reference
7/30/2019 Feasibility Report Presentation
8/17
Solutions
Option 4: Outsourced offsite storage, with outsourced
digital backup
Outsourced off site file storage
Outsourced digital backup Employees would access digital files for reference
Example: Shoreline Records Management
7/30/2019 Feasibility Report Presentation
9/17
Evaluation Criteria
Legal Risk
Ease of Implementation
Cost
Functionality
7/30/2019 Feasibility Report Presentation
10/17
Criteria
Legal Risk
HIPAA requirements
Secure Storage
Not accessible to public
Ease of Implementation
How much time will it take?
Implementation time + training time= hours of labor lost
7/30/2019 Feasibility Report Presentation
11/17
Criteria
Cost
Total cost of each alternative
Acquisition + Installation + Maintenance= Total Cost
Functionality
1. Can the files be accessed from the office?
2. Can the files be time stamped?
7/30/2019 Feasibility Report Presentation
12/17
Findings
Legal Risk
The least legal risk was found in Option 1(on site filing, no
digital backup).
Options 2 (on site, digital) and 4 (outsource) were both
rated with average risk because of the online storage
component.
Option 3 (offsite, digital) rated very high risk because of the
unpredictability of self-storage units.
7/30/2019 Feasibility Report Presentation
13/17
Findings
Ease of Implementation The easiest system to implement is Option 4 (outsourcing).
Options 2 (on site, digital) and 3 (off site, digital) take up the most time
because of the initial scanning of the files.
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
Option 1 Option 2 Option 3 Option 4
Hours of Lost Labor
Hours of Lost Labor
7/30/2019 Feasibility Report Presentation
14/17
Findings
Cost
Option 2 (on site, digital), is the cheapest
Option 4 (outsourcing), is the most expensive.
$-
$2,000.00
$4,000.00
$6,000.00$8,000.00
$10,000.00
$12,000.00
$14,000.00
$16,000.00
$18,000.00
Option 1 Option 2 Option 3 Option 4
Total Cost of Project
Total Cost (dollars)
7/30/2019 Feasibility Report Presentation
15/17
Findings
Functionality
Easiest to access is Option 2 (on site, digital), on site filing
with digital backup
Easiest to time stamp is Option 4(outsourcing)Most difficult to time stamp is Option 1(on site, no digital).
7/30/2019 Feasibility Report Presentation
16/17
Recommendation
Option 2, on site filing, with digital backup
Most cost efficient
Easiest to access
Moderate legal risk
Disadvantage: Long implementation time
7/30/2019 Feasibility Report Presentation
17/17
Questions?