Intermediate Chlorination Feasibility Study, Freetown Sierra Leone
Veolia Foundation Février 2014 1
INTERMEDIATE CHLORINATION FEASIBILITY STUDY
FREETOWN, SIERRA LEONE
Intermediate Chlorination Feasibility Study, Freetown Sierra Leone
Veolia Foundation Février 2014 2
SUMMARY
INTRODUCTION ..................................................................................................................................... 3 1. CONTEXT OF THE STUDY AND NETWORK COMPREHENSION .... ....................................... 3
1.1. General Context ..................................................................................................................... 3 1.2. Objectives of the study ........................................................................................................... 4 1.3. Area of the study – pre-requirements .................................................................................... 4
2. FEASIBILITY STUDY.................................. ................................................................................. 6 2.1. Methodology ........................................................................................................................... 6 2.2. The life of water from GUMA reservoir to the network ........................................................... 6 2.3. Visit and choice of the site of implantation of intermediate chlorination ................................ 9
2.3.1. Spur Road Reservoir: ........................................................................................................ 9 2.3.2. Tower Hill Reservoir ........................................................................................................ 11 2.3.3. Income Tax Break Pressure Tank ................................................................................... 12 2.3.4. Advantages and disadvantages of each site: .................................................................. 13
2.4. Feasibility study to install intermediate chlorination at tower hill.......................................... 15 2.4.1. Flow to chlorinate: ............................................................................................................ 15 2.4.2. Chlorination and bacteria : ............................................................................................... 17 2.4.3. Chlorine demand ............................................................................................................. 18 2.4.4. Size of installation – choice of technology ....................................................................... 19 2.4.5. Implantation of installation ............................................................................................... 23 2.4.6. list of necessary equipments ........................................................................................... 26
2.5. Operating cost ...................................................................................................................... 27 CONCLUSION ...................................................................................................................................... 27
Intermediate Chlorination Feasibility Study, Freetown Sierra Leone
Veolia Foundation Février 2014 3
INTRODUCTION
In 2013, ACF asked for the support of the Veolia Foundation to study the feasibility of implementing
an intermediate chlorination system on the network of Freetown. The general purpose of this
technical support from the foundation is to validate and develop the technical design, tender
specifications (including statement of works and bill of quantities) and capacity building
requirements for the installation of an intermediate chlorination system in the existing Guma Valley
Water Company (GVWC) network to reinforce the residual free chlorine available in the water at
distribution points. This intervention has been prioritized as during the 2012 cholera outbreak, most
of the water provided by GVWC had a free residual chlorine (FRC) level of 0 mg of Cl2/l at tap level
which increased the likelihood of water as a cholera transmission route.
1. CONTEXT OF THE STUDY AND NETWORK COMPREHENSION
1.1. GENERAL CONTEXT
ACF (Action Contre la Faim) is a part of a DFID funded Urban WASH Consortium and has implemented
WASH activities in Freetown since 2010. ACF plays a facilitating role to support GVWC to access
international expertise to carry out the feasibility study and installation of the intermediate
chlorination system.
The population of Freetown is approximately 1,200,000 people and is characterized by a large
number of people living in formal and informal settlements, many of whom rely on the GVWC
network for their water supply. GVWC was established in 1961 under the Guma Valley Water
Ordinance which gave it responsibility for supplying water to the Freetown area. GVWC is a
parastatal organization of which 99% is owned by the central government and 1% by the Freetown
City Council. It is an autonomous body that does not receive financial support from the government.
GVWC recently underwent a reform program aiming to improve service delivery and cost recovery
(December 2012 – March 2013). To further support these efforts, ACF will help GVWC to install an
intermediate chlorination system in its existing network, in order to ensure sufficient levels of
residual chlorine in communities at risk of cholera outbreaks.
The low level of free residual chlorine is due to several factors including:
• Length of the transmission network (around 15 km from the treatment plant to the main
reservoir or around 3 hours for the transfer).
• Characteristics of the pipes (old, internal corrosion (DN550) and loss of internal protection).
• High water temperature (pipes not buried, etc) leading to a decrease in the stability of the
free chlorine and creates a suitable environment for bacterial growth.
• Inconsistent water supply resulting in variable levels of water in the network, allowing
pathogens to enter the pipes in areas with leakages, etc.
Intermediate Chlorination Feasibility Study, Freetown Sierra Leone
Veolia Foundation Février 2014 4
1.2. OBJECTIVES OF THE STUDY
An initial feasibility study has already been carried out by ACF. The present study objectives are to:
• Validate the feasibility study already completed and particularly the installation site
of the intermediate chlorination,
• Confirm the technical option proposed (at current demands and projected future
demands) or propose an alternative technology; specify the power requirements and
the operations of maintenance needed with their approximate cost
• Develop a detailed design of the chlorination unit and ancillaries required to operate
it
• Prepare a bill of quantities, cost estimate, statement of works, and technical
specification in preparation for tendering
• Assess the need for training or other capacity development of GVWC staff involved in
the operation and maintenance of the system.
ACF will then produce a call for tenders to achieve the construction of this intermediate chlorination.
1.3. AREA OF THE STUDY – PRE-REQUIREMENTS
The proposed location for the intermediate chlorination system based on the initial feasibility study
was the Income Tax Zone of the network. It supplies water to approximately 142,000 people in the
downtown area of Freetown.
Fig. 1: Income Tax Zone (Atkins 2008)
Previous detailed studies of the network were carried out by Atkins Consulting in 2008 which
provided a complete map of the network, as well as functionality (at the time of the study) and
recommendations for expansion and improvements.
Intermediate Chlorination Feasibility Study, Freetown Sierra Leone
Veolia Foundation Février 2014 5
After discussions with GVWC, the area of the current study is extended to all the zones supplied by
gravity from Spur Road reservoir (low level zone): Spur Road Zone, Tower Hill Zone, Income Tax Zone,
Dan Street Zone, Africanus Road Zone and Wellington Zone. The sites selected to be visited are:
- Spur Road reservoir,
- Tower Hill reservoir,
- Income Tax Break pressure tank.
Fig 2: Low level supply zone
The main prerequisites needed for this study are:
- flow in the pipe where we choose to install intermediary chlorination,
- chlorine demand of the water to treat,
- location of the pipes,
- water pressure,
- availability of electrical energy in the area
- physical and organic quality of the water at the outlet of the treatment plant.
With these elements (or an estimation for those where data is not available), we chose:
- the site of implantation of intermediary chlorination,
- the technology of chlorination
After this first step, we will be able to make the feasibility study.
Spur Road
Kortwright
Tower HillIncome Tax Dan St
AfricanusRd
Wellington
Governors Lodge
Kissy
Lumley
SLAHQ
Aberdeen
Murray Town
Congo Cross
College Rd
RasmussonSt
Stadium
Circular Rd
Tower Hill
Kortwright
Income Tax
Dan St AfricanusRd
Kissy
Wellington
Governors Lodge
Bulk Transfer Main
Distribution MainPumping Station
Tower Hill WSR PRV
Bulk Meter
550mm
700mm
600mm 600mm
300mm
Intermediate Chlorination Feasibility Study, Freetown Sierra Leone
Veolia Foundation Février 2014 6
2. FEASIBILITY STUDY
2.1. METHODOLOGY
The methodology used to collect information for the study is:
- literature review (ATKINS main report 2008, GVWC 100 days transformation
programme report, WASH report July and august 2013, feasibility studies of
intermediary disinfection on GVWC October 2012, workshop presentation Freetown
Strategic Water Supply and sanitation Framework 13th
march 2008, Strategic water
supply and sanitation framework DFID August 2008),
- hydraulic modeling : Freetown model 2008 under Epanet software,
- site visits (GUMA dam, water treatment plant, three reservoir sites : Spur road,
Tower Hill and Income Tax),
- water samples analysis and chlorine decrease tests from the three reservoirs,
- discussions with GVWC, water directorate and CCU.
The basis of the study, after discussions and visits, are:
- finding the best place to install intermediary chlorination in terms of covered
population (most of the population should be covered by chlorine residual), injection
feasibility, energy requirements, hydraulics of the site
- finding the best technology to manage (good technology sizing, constraint of the site,
ease of use, supply in reagents).
2.2. THE LIFE OF WATER FROM GUMA RESERVOIR TO THE NETWORK
The origin of 90% of tap water in Freetown is the GUMA reservoir. The quality of the resource is
quite good. The turbidity does not exceed 6 NTU. It is a soft and low alkaline water. There are 6 levels
of intake to go to the plant.
Fig 3: GUMA Reservoir
Intermediate Chlorination Feasibility Study, Freetown Sierra Leone
Veolia Foundation Février 2014 7
The water treatment plant consists of 3 streams:
- Stream 1 : conventional clarification and Aquazur T filters
- Streams 2 and 3: pulsators and Aquazur T filters.
- The 3 streams are combined and then chlorinated before the treated water storage
tank.
The flow produced by plant is 75 000 m3/day.
The treatments are: pre-chlorination, correction of pH with lime and coagulation with aluminum
sulfate, flocculation, settling, filtration on sand and disinfection with gas chlorine.
The performance of the water treatment plant is not very high: around 30% on turbidity, whereas
with these treatments we should normally reach a minimum of 70% and obtain less than 1.5 NTU all
the time.
The filtration is not effective (loss of sand, movements of floor panels, not adapted backwash phases
and speeds).
This low efficiency has a consequence: it increases the chlorine demand of the water and can explain
the difficulties to maintain chlorine residual all along the network to Spur Road.
The chemical quality of treated water has another consequence: distributing cor…….rosive water
which can react with the pipe and therefore dissolve iron and increase leakage.
The other data we have on treated water are the following:
6,4 < pH < 7,4
0,6 < Cl2 < 1 mg/l
Fig 4: GUMA Water treatment plant
Intermediate Chlorination Feasibility Study, Freetown Sierra Leone
Veolia Foundation Février 2014 8
Fig 5: view on pulsators and sand filters
The treatment plant needs a stage of neutralization before distribution.
An improvement of the treatments (processes) would allow a more effective chlorine disinfection
and to maintain more easily a residual of chlorine in the network.
Intermediate Chlorination Feasibility Study, Freetown Sierra Leone
Veolia Foundation Février 2014 9
2.3. VISIT AND CHOICE OF THE SITE OF IMPLANTATION OF INTE RMEDIATE CHLORINATION
The main characteristics of the sites are below:
Site Income Tax BPT Tower Hill Reservoir Spur road Reservo ir
Capacity (m3) 20 5100 18400
Maximum flow at the outlet (m3/h) - estimation based on pipe size.
570 800 2250
Average flow at the outlet (m3/h) - calculation by Epanet model.
620 680 3800
Served population 147 500 106 500 378 600
Situation of reservoir (GPS)N 08.48582
W 013.23180N 08.48243
W 013.23393N 08.46936
W 013.26736
Situation of pipe (if different) the sameN 08.48147
W 013.23468?
access to pipe in the reservoirOutlet pipe is underground.
Possibility to chlorine directly in the reservoir.
Access to inlet pipe before junction Tower Hill Income Tax
There is 2 outlet pipes, 2 chambers, but it's very difficult
to know where they join. Underground.
depth of the pipe - 4,20 m550 : 5,20 m700 : 1,20 m
diameter of pipe (DN) 450 550 550 and 700
Residual free chlorine (mg/l Cl2) 0,02 (?) 0 0,18
Residual total chlorine (mg/l Cl2) 0,1 0,09 0,28
pH 7,5 7,1 6,7
Temperature (°C) 26 25 25
disponible area for building possible but difficult OK OK
Situation of electrical power on the road upstairs near (400 V - 50 Hz - 250 A) on place
2.3.1. Spur Road Reservoir:
This reservoir has a capacity of 18400 m3 and distributes to the entire low level supply zone.
The population covered by this reservoir is 378 600 inhabitants and around 35 600 m3/d. There is
45% of leakage.
There are two reservoirs and a pumping station which supplies Governors Lodge. The capacity is
significant and the average staying time is 4 hours 20 minutes but is very variable. So, if we want to
put an intermediate chlorination, it would be on the outlet. There are 2 outlets but we cannot see
and understand where they go through at the outlet, where they join and where they split. The only
Intermediate Chlorination Feasibility Study, Freetown Sierra Leone
Veolia Foundation Février 2014 10
solution to install a chlorination system would be to have two points of injection and a large
installation of chlorination.
Fig 6: Spur Road reservoir and pumping station
Fig 7: Spur Road outlet pipes chambers
Intermediate Chlorination Feasibility Study, Freetown Sierra Leone
Veolia Foundation Février 2014 11
2.3.2. Tower Hill Reservoir
This reservoir has a capacity of 5 100 m3 and is supplied by Spur Road reservoir. It is composed by 4
compartments with an inlet for each. There are also 3 outlets on the same outlet pipe. There is a
pumping station which supplies Kortwright zone. The average residence time in the reservoir is 7
hours 30 minutes.
The population covered by this reservoir is 106 500 inhabitants and the flow is around 15 800 m3/d.
There is 30% of leakage.
Fig 8: Tower Hill Reservoir
It is not possible to put the intermediate chlorination on the outlet and not possible in the reservoir
either.
But there is a valve chamber just before the reservoir with a junction of 2 pipes: one supplies Tower
Hill reservoir and the other one supplies Income Tax. It would be possible to install the chlorination
before the junction.
Another solution is to create a derivation from Income Tax pipe to the reservoir of Tower Hill.
In both cases, the area covered by chlorine would be quite large (covered population 254 000
inhabitants).
Intermediate Chlorination Feasibility Study, Freetown Sierra Leone
Veolia Foundation Février 2014 12
Fig 9: Valve chamber before Tower Hill Reservoir
2.3.3. Income Tax Break Pressure Tank
This reservoir has a capacity of 20 m3 and is supplied by Spur Road reservoir. It supplies only Income
Tax zone. The residence time in the tank is very little (around 1 minute).
The population covered by this reservoir is 147 500 inhabitants and the flow is around 16 900 m3/d.
There is 45% of leakage.
Fig 10: Income Tax BPT
Intermediate Chlorination Feasibility Study, Freetown Sierra Leone
Veolia Foundation Février 2014 13
Fig 11: Income Tax BPT inlet
The only solution to put the intermediate chlorination is directly in the tank. Though it would be
difficult to built the installation, to do the maintenance and to deliver reagents because of the
situation of the tank on this sloping area.
2.3.4. Advantages and disadvantages of each site:
Installing an intermediate chlorination system at Income Tax BPT has the disadvantage to cover only
Income Tax Zone. Guma Valley Water Company wants to cover the maximum network as possible. So
this solution could not be kept.
Spur Road has the big advantage to cover the entire low level network area. Though at least the two
outlets will have to be chlorinated and then the chlorination installation will have a big capacity and
Site Advantages Disadvantages
Income Tax BPT Little installation of chlorination.Possibility to chlorinate directly in the tank.
Chlorination of only Income Tax Zone.Site is a steep slope, so difficult to build and to
deliver the reagents. Electricity ?
Tower Hill Reservoir
Chlorination of a large part of low level network (because we can put the chlorination before the
reservoir before the junction Tower Hill Reservoir - pipe to Income Tax).
Availability of land. Electricity power (pumping station).
The distance between chlorine injection chamber and the top of the reservoir where we can install
the chlorination installation (180 m).Security of the injection pipe between installation
and injection (crossing shanty town).
Spur road Reservoir
All the low level network covered (but there is chlorine residual at the outlet, so actions on the
inlet and/or on the water treatment plant can increase the chlorine residual on the Spur Road
Zone).Availability of land.
Electricity power (pumping station).
Obligation to chlorine the outlet.Large amount of chlorine required.
Two outlets to chlorinate (difficult to have access to the area where they join).
Chlorinate at this step to have chlorine residual at the end of the network seems very difficult because the inhabitants of Spur Road Zone
should have high level of chlorine.
Intermediate Chlorination Feasibility Study, Freetown Sierra Leone
Veolia Foundation Février 2014 14
quite big reagents consumption. As there is some residual chlorine at the outlet, we can expect that
other actions on the inlet and on the treatment plant could have an influence to have chlorine
residual on the Spur Road Zone.
Tower Hill has the advantage to cover a large part of the low level network if we put the
intermediate chlorination before the junction Tower Hill Reservoir – Income Tax pipe. Many zones
could be covered by chlorine: Tower Hill Zone, Kortwright, Income Tax zone, Dan street zone and the
east of the city. There is no chlorine residual at the inlet of Tower Hill reservoir. So putting an
intermediate chlorination at this step of the network can cover a big part of the network with
chlorine. The chlorine residual needed would be lower than at Spur Road. The only difficulty of the
site is to secure the pipes for electricity and chlorine solution between the installation and the
injection chamber. So the advantages of this site are:
- area covered by chlorine,
- space on the GVWC site to build the intermediate chlorination,
- choice for the technology of chlorination to use,
- electrical energy available to provide for installation.
There are more advantages to build the intermediate chlorination on this site than on the others.
To complete comparison data between each site, you will find the table above:
Site Income Tax BPT Tower Hill Reservoir Spur road Reservo ir
Served population under reservoir 147 500 106 500 378 600
Population covered by chlorination if we implant it in this area
147 500 254 000 378 600
Necessity to chlorine this network +++ +++ +
Covered network + ++ +++
disponible area - ++ ++
Technical feasibility of implantation--
(slope, no contact time in the tank, no energy).
++(energy, possibility to chlorine Tower Hill network and pipe to
Income Tax).
-energy, 2 outlets so 2 points of
injection (diificulty to know where we can inject).
possible existing technology of chlorination
calcium hypochloritecalcium hypochloriteélectrochlorination
électrochlorinationCl2 gas
Investment cost ++ ++ ---
Operationnal cost ++ + ---
So, if we want to have at the same time:
- a good cover of the network in chlorine,
- the guarantee to inject chlorine at the good point,
- the possibility to choose easy technical technology,
- the availability of electricity to provide for installation,
- the security of the installation,
- the best compromise efficiency / installation and exploitation costs,
Tower Hill is the site which presents the best compromise.
Intermediate Chlorination Feasibility Study, Freetown Sierra Leone
Veolia Foundation Février 2014 15
2.4. FEASIBILITY STUDY TO INSTALL INTERMEDIATE CHLORINATI ON AT TOWER HILL
The main difficulties are to know the flow in the pipes, the chlorine demand and how it could
decrease in the network.
2.4.1. Flow to chlorinate:
Based on the diameter of the pipe before the junction (DN 550), the maximum flow in the pipe is 800
m3/h. To confirm this data, we used the hydraulic modeling of the network (EPANET model)
established by ATKINS in 2008.
Simulation under Epanet: Freetown Network
Intermediate Chlorination Feasibility Study, Freetown Sierra Leone
Veolia Foundation Février 2014 16
Zones of network under influence of Tower Hill, Income Tax, Dan Street, Africanus road and
Wellington
Network to and under Tower Hill
Intermediate Chlorination Feasibility Study, Freetown Sierra Leone
Veolia Foundation Février 2014 17
The average flow determined for each influence area downstream each reservoir is presented in the
below table:
Secteur Qmoy secteur Qmoy cumulé Capacité Tps séj moyen Qrempl
m3/h m3/h m3 hh:mm m3/h
Transmission 80,4 4312,1 - - -
-> Spur_Road 808,0 4231,6 18 400 4:20 2574,0
-> Governor's_Lodge 459,0 459,0 5 250 11:26 400,0
-> Tower_Hill 602,1 683,8 5 100 7:27 632,2
-> Kortright 81,8 81,8 2 200 2:54 270,0
-> Income_Tax 619,7 619,7 20 0:01 610,4
-> Inutilisé 0,0 0,0 4 300 #DIV/0! -
-> Dan_Street 346,3 346,3 4 300 12:24 486,0
-> Africanus_Road 20,5 81,7 700 8:34 28,8
-> Kissy 61,2 61,2 2 300 13:35 122,4
-> Wellington 1233,1 1233,1 5 000 4:03 738,4
Total général 4312,1 47 570
The model works well about the influence areas under each reservoir. But it is very difficult to
simulate the flows because the network is not all the time under pressure and the reservoirs are
sometimes empty. If the network was all the time under pressure, the average flow would be, at the
point we want to implant the rechlorination, around 1300 m3/h and the maximum flow around 1700
m3/h. The pipes size and the duration when the reservoirs are full in the day allow us to minimize
these flows. More realistic flows are:
Average flow : 800 m3/h
Maximum flow : 1000 m3/h
We propose to study the size of the installation based on these data.
2.4.2. Chlorination and bacteria : Monitoring the bacteriological quality of drinking water is needed to control the presence of
microorganisms that can cause illness or disease.
Pathogenic microorganisms that occur in polluted water include protozoa, bacteria and enteric
viruses. The most common disease this can cause is the gastrointestinal illness of diarrhoea.
Although gastrointestinal illness is usually non-life threatening in normal healthy adults, the risk of
death increases among vulnerable groups such as infants, the elderly and immunosuppressed
individuals.
Since it is not practical (as tests are extremely costly) or technically feasible to monitor for all
pathogens in drinking water, the microbiological quality of drinking water is evaluated based on
indicator microorganisms, such as total coliforms and E.coli.
Chlorine destroys disease-causing germs and helps make water safe to drink. Chlorine destroys
waterborne germs by penetrating their slime coatings, cell walls and resistant shells. Chlorine either
kills the germs or renders them incapable of reproducing. Chlorine is highly effective against most
disease-causing germs found in drinking water sources.
So the preservation of a residual of chlorine in the network is an effective way to prevent a
proliferation of bacteria and to guarantee a bacteriological quality of the water of drink.
Intermediate Chlorination Feasibility Study, Freetown Sierra Leone
Veolia Foundation Février 2014 18
2.4.3. Chlorine demand
When we introduce some chlorine into the water, the residual decreases in time due to the chemical
reactions which develop with the organic and mineral compounds. It is the demand in chlorine.
To determine the chlorine demand of the water, we have taken samples at each reservoir and we
made chlorine demands for different concentrations of chlorine at the beginning of experience.
To realize the chlorine demand, the operating mode was :
1- take 4 samples of each reservoir in brown glass beaker or bottles of 1 liter,
2- inject in it an increasing dose of chlorinated solution,
3- for example, here, we tested 0.5 – 1 – 1.5 – 2 mg/l of initial concentration.
4- Measure residual chlorine for different contact times during 14 hours or more.
5- The chlorine demand is the chlorine rate you have to dose to have an objective chlorine
residual after your contact time (contact time in a tank or in the network).
The results are below:
chlorine decrease Spur Road
0
0,5
1
1,5
2
0 5 10 15 20 25 30
time (h)
chlo
rine
resi
dual
(m
g/l)
For Spur Road, the speed of chlorine decrease of the water is -1.21 mg/l/d so, if we want to chlorine
the water at Spur road, we need to have a minimum rate of 2.5 g/m3 to cover all the area under Spur
road (it depends on the residence time in the network).
Bécher 1L Bécher 1L Bécher 1L Bécher 1L
Traitement à0.5 g/m3
Traitement à1 g/m3
Traitement à1.5 g/m3
Traitement à2 g/m3
Intermediate Chlorination Feasibility Study, Freetown Sierra Leone
Veolia Foundation Février 2014 19
chlorine decrease Tower Hill
0
0,5
1
1,5
2
0 5 10 15 20 25 30
time (h)
chlo
rine
resi
dual
(m
g/l)
The results show that chlorine decreases quite quickly (the speed of chlorine decrease of the water is
-0.52 mg/l/d). Chlorine demand is not very high. A chlorination rate of 1 g/m3 should be enough.
chlorine decrease Income Tax
0
0,5
1
1,5
2
0 5 10 15 20 25 30
time (h)
chlo
rine
resi
dual
(m
g/l)
For Income Tax, the speed of chlorine decrease of the water is -0.38 mg/l/d. A chlorination rate of
0.75 mg/l should be needed.
2.4.4. Size of installation – choice of technology
The hydraulic model is not usable to know the residence time of water in the pipe. We don’t know
exactly the time between Tower Hill and the end of the network and the chlorine demand of the
network either. It is impossible to simulate it with the model because the network is not all the time
under pressure.
If we evaluate a maximum time of 48 hours between Tower Hill and the end of network, we can size
the installation of chlorination on the basis of 1g/m3 of chlorine.
If the maximum flow is 1000 m3/h and the rate of treatment 1 g/m
3, we need to produce 1000 g/h of
chlorine maximum.
Intermediate Chlorination Feasibility Study, Freetown Sierra Leone
Veolia Foundation Février 2014 20
2.4.4.1. Usable existing technologies :
1- Gaseous chlorine :
The gaseous chlorine and the chlorinated compounds are very widely used for the disinfection. In
solution, the chlorine can appear under various states and react with different organic molecules or
mineral.
The principle consists of the injection of gaseous chlorine in a driving water which conveys the
chlorine to the injection point.
Example of gaseous chlorination system
This technology is efficient but needs very strict safety regulations. Chlorine gas is a highly toxic
substance for both humans and the environment, and must be stored carefully to avoid leakage.
2- Electrochlorination
The process involved in electrochlorination is the desalination of water to produce a chlorinated
solution. This happens when saltwater is inserted into electrolytic cells. The saltwater is streamed
through a channel of decreasing thickness. One side of the channel is a cathode, the other is an
anode. As the water flows through the anode/cathode channel, a low voltage DC current is applied.
When this happens, the electrolysis is triggered and sodium hypochlorite is instantly produced as
well as hydrogen gas (H2). The hydrogen rich sodium hypochlorite then travels to a tank that removes
the hydrogen gas. The dehydrogenization mechanism varies from device to device but the process is
generally the same. After hydrogen has been removed from the solution, the hypochlorite is stored
in a tank as the finished product.[1]
No chemicals other than ordinary salt, or sodium chloride (NaCl),
are used throughout the entirety of the process. Although the actual chemical processes involved are
complex, they can be simply represented by the following equation:
NaCl + H2O + ENERGY → NaOCl + H2
In words this reads, energy is added to sodium chloride (table salt) in water, resulting in sodium
hypochlorite and hydrogen gas.
The solution is then pumped to the injection point.
Intermediate Chlorination Feasibility Study, Freetown Sierra Leone
Veolia Foundation Février 2014 21
Exemple of electrochlorination system
3- Calcium hypochlorite
Calcium hypochlorite is a yellow white solid which has a strong smell of chlorine. It is not highly soluble in water and is more preferably used in soft to medium-hard water. It has two forms: dry and hydrated. The hydrated form is safer to handle.
Calcium hypochlorite reacts with carbon dioxide to form calcium carbonate and release dichlorine
monoxide:
Ca(ClO)2 + CO2 → CaCO3 + Cl2O↑
A calcium hypochlorite solution is basic. This is due to the hydrolysis performed by the hypochlorite
ion, as hypochlorous acid is weak, but calcium hydroxide is a strong base. As a result, the
hypochlorite ion is a strong conjugate base, and the calcium ion is a weak conjugate acid:
ClO−+ H2O → HClO + OH
−
Example of calcium hypochlorite system
The solution is then pumped to the injection point.
Intermediate Chlorination Feasibility Study, Freetown Sierra Leone
Veolia Foundation Février 2014 22
2.4.4.2. Choice of technology:
The existing chlorination systems are compared below:
Technology Cl2 gas Electrochlorination Calcium hypochlorite
Investment costs + --- ++
Reactive costs --- - (pure salt needed) +
availibility of reactive + ? +
Exploitation costs + -- ++
needed energy ++ -- ++
security of installation / safety for the staff
--- + +
technical know-how ++ --- ++
The principal difficulty to use chlorine gas is the security of installation in urban zone, the transport
of reagents in urban zones and the security of staff for maintenance.
With electrochlorination, there are two principal difficulties: the availability of reactive (it is very
important to use pure salt) and the electrical power needed to run the installation.
Installation of chlorination using calcium hypochlorite has fewer disadvantages. We need less energy,
less technical know-how and less maintenance too compared with electrochlorination.
If we install chlorination at Spur road, electro-chlorination is the only possible technology because of
the flow to treat and the security in urban zone.
If we install chlorination at Income Tax, the best technology is calcium hypochlorite because it needs
less electrical energy and is simpler to manage.
We studied two technologies for the intermediate chlorination at Tower Hill: electro-chlorination and
calcium hypochlorite.
Intermediate Chlorination Feasibility Study, Freetown Sierra Leone
Veolia Foundation Février 2014 23
You will find a comparison of the two technologies in the board below.
The electro-chlorination is very successful but it is very expensive and this type of installation needs
good competence to drive it. Previous experiences have shown that repairing breakdowns in these
installations is very complex.
On the contrary, calcium hypochlorite is very simple. The only inconvenience is that if there is a big
chlorine demand sustained over many hours, it is not sure that we could have a 120 g/l Cl2 solution
all the time because it is necessary to have a time between fabrication and injection. With the
proposed installation, if we treat 750 m3/h, there is 20 hours of autonomy but there is continuous
manufacturing. So the autonomy of installation between two loads in reagents is around 3 days.
This solution needs a lower electrical power. It would be possible to use batteries to ensure a
constant supply.
It is why we favor chlorination with calcium hypochlorite installation. The other advantage is the
supply in reagents from Guinea.
2.4.5. Implantation of installation To chlorinate both arrival to Tower Hill reservoir and pipe to Income Tax, we have two solutions
which are described below:
Electrochlorination Calcium hypochlorite
Chlorine product max (g Cl2/h) 1000 1000
Power needed (kVA) 7.5 1.5
fabrication water pressure needed (minimum in meters) 20 -
Cost of installation (USD FT) departure of France 95000 USD 10000 USD
needed area (LxlxH) 2000x600x2000 1400x1000x1100
maintenance
good local aeration needed (exothermic reaction), bad quality of
chlorine at the start.Competence in electronic and
automatism required.
simple. No particular competenciesrequired. Only intervention on
injection pump and injection point if necessary.
reagents pure salt (99,95 % NaCl minimum) Calcium hypochlorite tablets
packaging Bags of 25 kgs Barrel of 25 kgs 20 gram tablets
country of provenance (reagents) France Guinea
estimate cost (reagents) 6,72 USD/kg
estimate cost (transport) 1290 USD
Intermediate Chlorination Feasibility Study, Freetown Sierra Leone
Veolia Foundation Février 2014 24
Solution 1 :
This solution consist in implanting a point of chlorination just before the junction Tower Hill reservoir
– Income Tax pipe.
It needs to enlarge the valve chamber to put the point of injection, static mixer and the flowmeter.
The pipes of injection and electric cables will come from the old pumping station (which will be
Intermediate Chlorination Feasibility Study, Freetown Sierra Leone
Veolia Foundation Février 2014 25
renovated to install the installation of chlorination and the stock of reagents) all along the feed pipe
of Tower Hill reservoir.
Solution 2 :
This solution consists in deleting the pipe which rises to the reservoir of Tower Hill and creating a
deviation from Income Tax pipe to the reservoir of Tower Hill.
Intermediate Chlorination Feasibility Study, Freetown Sierra Leone
Veolia Foundation Février 2014 26
A new valve chamber will be required, along with new pipework rising up the hill to the inlet point
and returning to the original Income Tax pipe, installation of a flowmeter and an injection point on
the reservoir.
This solution is easier to secure because all the strategic equipments and the lines of injection and
power are on the site of the reservoir.
2.4.5.1. Work to do for this solution :
A. Implantation of two tees of connection and a valve of isolation on the pipe of distribution
towards Income Tax,
B. From the tee upstream, implementation of a pipe of diversion towards the reservoir of
Tower Hill,
C. On the top of the reservoir, implementation of flowmeter to regulate chlorination, injection
point of chlorine. Isolation of flowmeter by valves downstream/upstream (1). A check valve
will be installed to ensure that the flowmeter does not drain if the water distribution stops
(2),
D. Return to the Income Tax network by a new pipe installed in parallel of B pipe,
E. Connection to supply network of Tower Hill downstream of the flowmeter with isolation
valve (3).
F. Installation of chlorination device with calcium hypochlorite (with chlorine regulation and
dosing pumps) in the old pump station. The electric cupboard should also be installed in this
room.
G. Sheaths of connection between the place of installation of the chlorination and the point of
injection and the flowmeter for hydraulic and electric connection.
H. Sheaths of connection from pumping station to chlorination for power supply of the electric
cupboard.
It is necessary to secure the storage of reagents, so, if the ordered quantities are quite high, the
chlorination room should be enlarged.
2.4.6. list of necessary equipments
A. - valve chamber on Income Tax network,
- isolation valve in the valve chamber (DN 450),
- Tee (2) in the valve chamber (DN 450).
B, C, D, E.
- pipe of derivation in cast iron (DN 450),
- isolation valves (2) for flowmeter (DN 450),
- check valve (DN 450),
- flowmeter (DN 400),
- injection cane,
- isolation valve to Tower Hill (DN 450).
F
- calcium hypochlorite installation,
- reagents storage,
- dosing pumps (2),
Intermediate Chlorination Feasibility Study, Freetown Sierra Leone
Veolia Foundation Février 2014 27
- chlorine analyzer.
G
- hydraulic connection to injection,
- electric connection to flowmeter.
H
- electric connection between pumping station and chlorine room.
2.5. OPERATING COST
The estimating operating cost can be broken down in the following way:
- workforce for operating (1/2 h per day to verify installation and load in reagents + 1h per
week for maintenance),
- reagents (15 kg/day max),
- electric power
So the estimate operating cost should be:
- workforce for operating : 600 USD/year
- reagents (1 supply every 2 months) : 48000 USD/year.
- Maintenance (change of probe – 1/year, change lid, membrane on pump – 1/year) : 500
USD/year
- Electric power 5 kVA or less if battery: 5000 USD/year.
CONCLUSION GVWC needs to install an intermediate chlorination in its existing network in order to ensure
sufficient levels of residual chlorine in communities at risk of cholera outbreaks. So ACF has the
mission to install this intermediate chlorination in Freetown. Veolia foundation support ACF in this
mission.
The purpose of this study was to define:
o The location for the chlorination (considering tower hill and spur road as well)
o The technology to be used
o The power requirements for it
o The operation and maintenance costs for GVWC
After visiting all the potential sites, the choice would be to install the intermediate chlorination at
Tower Hill Reservoir because we can chlorinate water just before the reservoir and have chlorine
residual down to Tower Hill network and Income Tax network and farther.
For that, we have two solutions of setting-up the installation:
* First solution: create a chamber before the existing valve chamber to put chlorination point and
flowmeter (the advantage is to not change the hydraulic configuration of the network, the
Intermediate Chlorination Feasibility Study, Freetown Sierra Leone
Veolia Foundation Février 2014 28
inconvenient is to have a big length of chlorine pipe and energy between the installation and the
chamber),
* second solution : abandon the current pipe which rises to the reservoir and create a diversion
on the pipe which go to Income Tax (the advantage is to have an installation more secure, energy
and installation of chlorination close to the injection point, the inconvenient is to create the pipe
between Income Tax pipe and Tower Hill reservoir).
The 2nd
solution seems better (it is safer due to the local environment).
The choice of the technology to be used goes to calcium hypochlorite chlorination. Indeed, it is easier
to use and less subject to breakdowns.
The needed power and operation and maintenance costs for GVWC are précised too in this report.
With all these elements, ACF should be able to establish the tender documents.