+ All Categories
Home > Documents > Featured Article :

Featured Article :

Date post: 06-Jan-2016
Category:
Upload: almira
View: 28 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend
Description:
Featured Article :. Glucagon-Like Peptide 1 Receptor Agonist or Bolus Insulin With Optimized Basal Insulin in Type 2 Diabetes. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Popular Tags:
14
Glucagon-Like Peptide 1 Receptor Agonist or Bolus Insulin With Optimized Basal Insulin in Type 2 Diabetes Featured Article: Michaela Diamant, Michael A. Nauck, Rimma Shaginian, James K. Malone, Simon Cleall, Matthew Reaney, Danielle de Vries, Byron J. Hoogwerf, Leigh MacConell, and Bruce H.R. Wolffenbuttel, for the 4B Study Group Diabetes Care Volume 37: 2763-2 773 October, 2014
Transcript
Page 1: Featured Article :

Glucagon-Like Peptide 1 Receptor Agonist or Bolus Insulin With Optimized Basal Insulin in

Type 2 Diabetes

Featured Article:

Michaela Diamant, Michael A. Nauck, Rimma Shaginian, James K. Malone, Simon Cleall, Matthew Reaney, Danielle de Vries, Byron J.

Hoogwerf, Leigh MacConell, and Bruce H.R. Wolffenbuttel, for the 4BStudy Group

Diabetes Care Volume 37: 2763-2773

October, 2014

Page 2: Featured Article :

STUDY OBJECTIVE 

• To compare the efficacy and safety of exenatide twice daily or mealtime insulin lispro in patients inadequately controlled by insulin glargine and metformin despite up-titration

Diamant M. et al. Diabetes Care 2014;37:2763-2773

Page 3: Featured Article :

STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS

• Trial was a 30-week, open-label, multicenter, randomized, noninferiority trial with 12

• weeks prior insulin optimization

• 627 patients with insufficient postoptimization glycated HbA1c were randomized to exenatide (10–20 mg/day) or thrice-daily mealtime lispro titrated to a premeal glucose of 5.6–6.0 mmol/L

• Both were added to insulin glargine and metformin

Diamant M. et al. Diabetes Care 2014;37:2763-2773

Page 4: Featured Article :

RESULTS

• Randomization HbA1c and fasting glucose (FG) were 8.3% and 7.1 mmol/L for exenatide and 8.2% and 7.1 mmol/L for lispro, respectively

• At 30 weeks postrandomization, mean HbA1c changes were noninferior for exenatide compared with lispro

• Treatment differences were –0.04 in per-protocol and –0.03 in intent-to-treat populations

• FG was lower with exenatide than lispro

Diamant M. et al. Diabetes Care 2014;37:2763-2773

Page 5: Featured Article :

RESULTS

• Weight decreased with exenatide and increased with lispro

• More patients reported treatment satisfaction and better quality of life with exenatide than lispro

• A larger proportion of patients with exenatide experienced treatment-emergent adverse events

• Exenatide resulted in fewer nonnocturnal hypoglycemic episodes but more gastrointestinal adverse events than lispro

Diamant M. et al. Diabetes Care 2014;37:2763-2773

Page 6: Featured Article :

Diamant M. et al. Diabetes Care 2014;37:2763-2773

Page 7: Featured Article :

CONCLUSIONS

• Adding exenatide to titrated glargine with metformin resulted in similar glycemic control as adding lispro and was well tolerated

• Findings support exenatide as a noninsulin addition for patients failing basal insulin

Diamant M. et al. Diabetes Care 2014;37:2763-2773

Page 8: Featured Article :

Diamant M. et al. Diabetes Care 2014;37:2763-2773

Page 9: Featured Article :

Diamant M. et al. Diabetes Care 2014;37:2763-2773

Page 10: Featured Article :

Diamant M. et al. Diabetes Care 2014;37:2763-2773

Page 11: Featured Article :

Diamant M. et al. Diabetes Care 2014;37:2763-2773

Page 12: Featured Article :

Diamant M. et al. Diabetes Care 2014;37:2763-2773

Page 13: Featured Article :

Diamant M. et al. Diabetes Care 2014;37:2763-2773

Page 14: Featured Article :

Diamant M. et al. Diabetes Care 2014;37:2763-2773


Recommended