+ All Categories
Home > Documents > Feeding ecology of platynereis dumerilii (audouin & milne-edwards) in the seagrass posidonia...

Feeding ecology of platynereis dumerilii (audouin & milne-edwards) in the seagrass posidonia...

Date post: 08-Dec-2016
Category:
Upload: lucia
View: 214 times
Download: 1 times
Share this document with a friend
15
This article was downloaded by: [Mount Allison University 0Libraries] On: 16 April 2013, At: 20:29 Publisher: Taylor & Francis Informa Ltd Registered in England and Wales Registered Number: 1072954 Registered office: Mortimer House, 37-41 Mortimer Street, London W1T 3JH, UK Ophelia Publication details, including instructions for authors and subscription information: http://www.tandfonline.com/loi/smar19 Feeding ecology of platynereis dumerilii (audouin & milne-edwards) in the seagrass posidonia oceanica system: The role of the epiphytic flora (Polychaeta, nereididae) Maria Cristina Gambi a b , Valerio Zupo a , Maria Cristina Buia a & Lucia Mazzella a a Stazione Zoologica “A. Dohrn” di Napoli, Laboratorio di Ecologia del Benthos, Punta S. Pietro, Ischia, Napoli, Italy b Italy Phone: +39 81 5833513 Fax: +39 81 5833513 E-mail: Version of record first published: 19 Dec 2011. To cite this article: Maria Cristina Gambi , Valerio Zupo , Maria Cristina Buia & Lucia Mazzella (2000): Feeding ecology of platynereis dumerilii (audouin & milne-edwards) in the seagrass posidonia oceanica system: The role of the epiphytic flora (Polychaeta, nereididae), Ophelia, 53:3, 189-202 To link to this article: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00785326.2000.10409449 PLEASE SCROLL DOWN FOR ARTICLE Full terms and conditions of use: http://www.tandfonline.com/page/terms-and-conditions This article may be used for research, teaching, and private study purposes. Any substantial or systematic reproduction, redistribution, reselling, loan, sub-licensing, systematic supply, or distribution in any form to anyone is expressly forbidden. The publisher does not give any warranty express or implied or make any representation that the contents will be complete or accurate or up to date. The accuracy of any instructions, formulae, and drug doses should be independently verified with primary sources. The publisher shall not be liable for any loss, actions, claims, proceedings, demand, or costs or damages whatsoever or howsoever caused arising directly or indirectly in connection with or arising out of the use of this material.
Transcript
Page 1: Feeding ecology of platynereis dumerilii (audouin & milne-edwards) in the seagrass posidonia oceanica system: The role of the epiphytic flora (Polychaeta, nereididae)

This article was downloaded by: [Mount Allison University 0Libraries]On: 16 April 2013, At: 20:29Publisher: Taylor & FrancisInforma Ltd Registered in England and Wales Registered Number: 1072954 Registered office: Mortimer House,37-41 Mortimer Street, London W1T 3JH, UK

OpheliaPublication details, including instructions for authors and subscription information:http://www.tandfonline.com/loi/smar19

Feeding ecology of platynereis dumerilii (audouin &milne-edwards) in the seagrass posidonia oceanicasystem: The role of the epiphytic flora (Polychaeta,nereididae)Maria Cristina Gambi a b , Valerio Zupo a , Maria Cristina Buia a & Lucia Mazzella† aa Stazione Zoologica “A. Dohrn” di Napoli, Laboratorio di Ecologia del Benthos, Punta S.Pietro, Ischia, Napoli, Italyb Italy Phone: +39 81 5833513 Fax: +39 81 5833513 E-mail:Version of record first published: 19 Dec 2011.

To cite this article: Maria Cristina Gambi , Valerio Zupo , Maria Cristina Buia & Lucia Mazzella† (2000): Feeding ecology ofplatynereis dumerilii (audouin & milne-edwards) in the seagrass posidonia oceanica system: The role of the epiphytic flora(Polychaeta, nereididae), Ophelia, 53:3, 189-202

To link to this article: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00785326.2000.10409449

PLEASE SCROLL DOWN FOR ARTICLE

Full terms and conditions of use: http://www.tandfonline.com/page/terms-and-conditions

This article may be used for research, teaching, and private study purposes. Any substantial or systematicreproduction, redistribution, reselling, loan, sub-licensing, systematic supply, or distribution in any form toanyone is expressly forbidden.

The publisher does not give any warranty express or implied or make any representation that the contentswill be complete or accurate or up to date. The accuracy of any instructions, formulae, and drug doses shouldbe independently verified with primary sources. The publisher shall not be liable for any loss, actions, claims,proceedings, demand, or costs or damages whatsoever or howsoever caused arising directly or indirectly inconnection with or arising out of the use of this material.

Page 2: Feeding ecology of platynereis dumerilii (audouin & milne-edwards) in the seagrass posidonia oceanica system: The role of the epiphytic flora (Polychaeta, nereididae)

OPHELIA 53 (3): 189-202 (December 2000)

FEEDING ECOLOGY OF PLATYNEREIS DUMER/ilI (AUDOUIN & MILNE-EDWARDS) IN THE SEAGRASS

POSIDONIA OCEANICA SYSTEM: THE ROLE OF THE EPIPHYTIC FLORA (POLYCHAETA, NEREIDIDAE)

Maria Cristina Cambi, Valerio Zupo, Maria Cristina Buia, Lucia Mazzella t

Stazione Zoologica "A. Dohrn" di Napoli, Laboratorio di Ecologia del Benthos, Punta S. Pietro, 80077 Ischia (Napoli, Italy).

Corresponding author: M.C. Cambi, tel. no. +39 81 5833513, fax no. +39 81 984201 E-mail: [email protected]

ABSTRACT The feeding ecology and the ecological role of the her­bivorous polychaete Plo.tynereis dwne'lilii (Audouin & Milne-Edwards) (Nereididae) in the epiphytic commu­nity of the Mediterranean seagrass ·Posidonia oceanica (L.) Delile was investigated under natural and laborato­ry conditions. Experiments were devised to define the preferred items, their consumption rate and degree of assimilation of chlorophylls. Results of faecal pellets analyses, food-choice experiments and photosynthetic pigment analyses demonstrated that P. dllmmlii feeds preferentially on erect filamentous algae. Worms of length above 10 mm may graze also on living tissue of Posidonia leaves, when starved. This behaviour has rarely been reported for invertebrates, and especially for poly­chaetes in Posidonia ecosystems. Small individuals had a lower feeding rate on large macroalgae (e.g., Cystosei-ra), but higher digestive efficiency. Platynereis dllmmlii thus feeds preferentially on erect micro- and macroalgae which are more easily cut by the jaws of its eversible pharynx. This selective herbivore thus has a special mi­croniche, with respect to other mesograzers inhabiting the Posidonia meadows.

Key-words: Platynereis, Nereididae, Polychaeta, Posidonia oceanica, seagrass, feeding, epiphytes, Mediterranean Sea.

INTRODUCTION

Mesograzers are defined as small-sized herbi­vores living in the seaweeds on which they feed (Hay et al. 1988). They are abundant in macroalgal communities on hard bottoms (Brawley 1992) and on the canopies of marine phanerogams (Hutchings 1982; Scipione et al. 1996), and play an important role in the food

webs of these systems as links to the highest trophic levels (Hawkins et al. 1992; Orth & van Montfrans 1984). Habitat selection and feed­ing preferences of mesograzers coincide, and represent a compromise between the structural complexity of the plants (algae or seagrasses), selected respect to size and crypsis potential, and plant toughness and palatability, which is related to their morpho-functional features and energy require men ts (Brawley 1992) . Meso­grazers play a minor role in the direct con­sumption of seagrass living tissues. However, they are important consumers of the algal epi­phytic community on the leaves and of detritus entrapped in the periphyton (Orth & van Montfrans 1984; Mazzella & Zupo 1995). Fur­thermore, the epiphytic algal forms show a va­riety of morpho-functional guilds (Littler & Lit­tler 1980; Hudon & Legendre 1987), which have implications for their availability as poten­tial food for invertebrate grazers (Steneck & Watling 1982; Mazzella et al. 1994).

The leaves of the Mediterranean seagrass Posidonia oceanica (L.) Delile support a highly diversified and complex plant-epiphytic com­munity, exhibiting typical successional stages, with the maximum diversity and biomass in summer, mainly in shallow water stands (Mazzella et al. 1989, 1994; Buia 1989). Most of this production is transferred to secondary consumers through the grazing pathway, due to mesograzers (Mazzella et al. 1992; Mazzella & Zupo 1995) mainly represented by molluscs, and crustaceans (Scipione et al. 1996). The

Dow

nloa

ded

by [

Mou

nt A

lliso

n U

nive

rsity

0L

ibra

ries

] at

20:

29 1

6 A

pril

2013

Page 3: Feeding ecology of platynereis dumerilii (audouin & milne-edwards) in the seagrass posidonia oceanica system: The role of the epiphytic flora (Polychaeta, nereididae)

190 M. C. GAMBI ET AL.

Fig. 1. A, a typical early colonization phase of the plant epiphytic community on a Posidonia oceanica leaf charac­terized by prostrate diatoms of the genus Cocconeis, and a young specimen of Fosliella/Pneophyllum (scale bar; 0.1 mm). B, a specimen of the epiphytic erect alga Sphace-

laria sp. on a Posidonia leaf (s.b.; I mm).

role of the epiphytic flora of P oceanica in the feeding ecology of mesograzers has been stud­ied for some species of gastropod molluscs (Mazzella & Russo 1989), amphipod (Scipione & Mazzella 1992) and decapod crustaceans (Zupo 1994) .

The polychaete Platynereis dumerilii (Audouin & Milne-Edwards) (Nereididae) represents a typical mesograzer, commonly associated with seaweeds, mainly brown algae, from shallow hard bottoms (Bedford & Moore 1985; Gian­grande 1988). It is also very common in sea­grass meadows, such as Posidonia, Zostera and Cymodocea (Lanera & Gambi 1993; Gambi et al. 1995) in the Mediterranean Sea. A study on polychaete distribution in a P oceanica bed off the Island of Ischia (Gulf of Naples), revealed that P dumerilii is frequent in shallow water (1-5 m) during late spring and summer (Gambi et al. 1992; Gambi & Lanera 1992), mainly repre­sented by relatively small or juvenile specimens

(Gambi, pers. observ.). P dwnerilii is semel­parous, reproducing in late summer by epitoky and possessing a pelagic stage with a plankto­trophic larva (Pfannenstiel et al. 1987; Grant 1989; Giangrande 1989). Worms live inside se­mi-permanent mucous tubes, that are generally attached to macroalgal thalli (Bedford & Moore 1985). Like congeneric species, P du­merilii generally feeds close to the tube en­trance, to which worms attach small pieces of algae. Such typical behaviour is known as "algal gardening" (Casanova & Coulon-Roso 1967; Woodin 1977; Cram & Evans 1980; Branch et al. 1992).

Aspects of the trophic behaviour and ecology of P dumerilii have been studied under labora­tory conditions (Cram & Evans 1980; Evans & Downie 1986; Gambi & Di Meglio 1996). How­ever, data on this species from both seaweeds (Bedford & Moore 1985) and seagrass mead­ows Qacob & Pierson 1979) are limited, and are lacking as far as P oceanica beds are con­cerned. This research, which is part of a wider project aimed at a better definition of the graz­ing pathways involved in energy transfer through the Posidonia system, is focused on the feeding ecology of P dllrnerilii in Posidonia meadows. The aims are to characterize the nat­ural diet of this species, evaluate its faecal pellet production and assimilation efficiency, as well as to discuss the adaptive significance and the ecological implications of its trophic behaviour.

RESULTS

Posidonia epiphytic comm1Lnity

The plant epiphytic community on the Posido­nia leaves offered was characterized by two main morpho-functional groups of species: en­crusting and erect algal forms. The encrusting assemblage was characterized by the domi­nance of both diatoms (mainly of the genus Cocconeis) , and encrusting coralline algae of the Fosliella/ Pneophyllw1! spp. group (Fig. lA) (cov­erage between 25 and 90%) and Myrionema or­bietLlare (coverage between 1 and 60%). The coverage of the encrusting species, before ex­posure to worm grazing, varied between 32 and 100% with a mean of 64.6±17 .3% (N = 24) on the upper leaf side, while the lower leaf side had lower values, ranging from 11 to 80% with a mean of 36.6±16.8% (N = 24).

The erect epiphytic community was charac­terized by a complex association of micro- and macro algae , representing the mature stage of

Dow

nloa

ded

by [

Mou

nt A

lliso

n U

nive

rsity

0L

ibra

ries

] at

20:

29 1

6 A

pril

2013

Page 4: Feeding ecology of platynereis dumerilii (audouin & milne-edwards) in the seagrass posidonia oceanica system: The role of the epiphytic flora (Polychaeta, nereididae)

FEEDING ECOLOGY OF P. DUMERlUI IN POSIDONIA ECOSYSTEM 191

Table 1: List of the plant epiphytes identified in the Posidonia oceanica leaves, and in the fecal pellets of the polycha­ete Platynereis dumlffilii in natural diet and laboratory grazing conditions.

Plant epiphytes

Diatoms Biddulphia sp. Cyclotella sp. Coscinodiscus sp. Melosira sp. Fragilaria sp. Orarnmatophora spp. Lychmophara sp. Synedra spp. Striatella sp. Rhabdonema sp. Achnanthes sp. Amphora spp. Campylodiscus sp. Cocconeis cf pSli1.ldomarginata Gregory Cocconeis spp. Diploneis sp. Entomoneis sp. Mastogloia sp. Navicula sp. Nitzschia sp. Podocystis adriatica Kuetzing

Macroalgae AudOllinella daviesii (Dillwyn) Woelkerling Audouinella sp. Champiaceae indo Pneophyllum/Fosliella spp. Antithamnion sp. Clffamium codii (Richards) G. Mazoyer Ceramium flaccidum (Kuetzing) Ardissone Clffamium tenerrimum (Martens) Otamura Clffamium diaphanmn (Lightfoot) Roth Clffamiumsp. Lophosiphonia sp. Nithophyllum punctatum (Stackhouse) GrevilJe Splffmothamnion ·repens (Dillwyn) Rosevinge Polysiphonia sp. 1 Polysiphonia sp. 2 Cladosiphon cylindricus (Sauvageau) Kylin Gimudia sphacelarioides Derber & Sohier Myrionema orbiculare J. Agardh Sphacelaria cirrosa (Roth) C. Agardh Sphacelaria sp. Dictyota sp. Cladophora sp. Seriacea gen sp.

Other items broken frustules of diatoms filamentous algae (unident. remains) Coralline algae (unident. remains) Posidonia oceanica (L.) Delile (fragments) Coccolitophorids Spores (unidentified) Amorphous material Mucous

+ ~ presence; - ~ absence.

Posidonia leaves

+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +

+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +

+ +

P. dumerilii faecal pellets (natural diet on Posidonia)

+ +

+

+ + +

+ + +

+

+ + +

+ +

P. dumerilii faecal pellets (laboratory

grazing)

+

+ + + + + + + + + + +

+

+ + +

+

+ + +

+

+ + +

+ +

+ + + +

+ + +

Dow

nloa

ded

by [

Mou

nt A

lliso

n U

nive

rsity

0L

ibra

ries

] at

20:

29 1

6 A

pril

2013

Page 5: Feeding ecology of platynereis dumerilii (audouin & milne-edwards) in the seagrass posidonia oceanica system: The role of the epiphytic flora (Polychaeta, nereididae)

192 M. C. GAMBI ET AL.

Fig. 2. A, S.E.M. micrograph of a typical faecal pellet of Plat)>nere-is d-urnerilii under natural diet (Posidonia mead­ow)· conditions. B, S.E.M. micrograph of a typical faecal pellet of P. dumerilii in laboratory feeding conditions (erect epiphytes); note the presence of the thin, mucous film (peri trophic membrane) enveloping the faecal ma­terial. C and D, S.E.M. micrographs of items found in faecal pellet material of Platynerei.s dumerilii under natu­ral diet (PosidDnia meadow) conditions: C, frustules of VariOllS species of benthic diatoms; D, fragment of a

coralline alga; (s. b. of all micrographs: 0.1 mm)

Fig. 3. S.E.M. micrographs showing the traces of grazing of Plalynerei.s dumerilii on epiphytes of Posidonia leaves under laboratory feeding conditions. A and B, traces of grazing on coralline algae (Fosliella/Pneophyllum) ; C, traces of grazing on erect filamen taus algae (Spha celaria sp.); D, traces of grazing on Posidonia living leaf tissue. Note the 'half-moon' shape of the bite marks; (s.b. of all

micrographs= 0.1 mm) .

Dow

nloa

ded

by [

Mou

nt A

lliso

n U

nive

rsity

0L

ibra

ries

] at

20:

29 1

6 A

pril

2013

Page 6: Feeding ecology of platynereis dumerilii (audouin & milne-edwards) in the seagrass posidonia oceanica system: The role of the epiphytic flora (Polychaeta, nereididae)

FEEDING ECOLOGY OF P. DUlVIERILII IN POSIDONIA ECOSYSTEM 193

Fig. 4. Stereo microscope picture showing the grazing of a large specimen of P. dllmerilii on the edge of a Posidonia leaf, characterized by an encrusting epiphytic community. Note the 'half-moon' shape of the bites (arrows).

the Posidonia epiphytic assemblage (Mazzella et al. 1989; 1994). Among the diatoms, besides the genus Cocconeis, which dominates with sev­eral species, the genera Amphora, Gmmmatopho­ra and Synedra were also frequent. The macro al­gae were dominated by erect filamentous forms, mainly brown algae, such as Sphacelaria ciTTosa (Fig. IB) (coverage between 6 and 65%) and A-udovinella daviesii (coverage between 3 and 10%), but the encrusting corallinaceous forms were also quite abundant, especially Fos­liella/Pneoph."lllum with coverage ranging from 5 to 80%. The coverage of erect and encrusting epiphytes on the upper side of leaf blades, be­fore feeding by the worms, varied between 35 and 100% with a mean of 68.6±23.6.0% (N =

11), while lower and more variable values were observed on the lower leaf side, ranging from 15 to 70% with a mean of30.1±16.1 % (N = 10).

A complete list of the plant taxa found as epiphytes on the Posidonia leaves is given in Table 1.

Faecal pellet analyses

Faecal pellets collected under natural condi­tions and in laboratory experiments were quite irregular in size. They were cylindrical in shape, with a compact consistency (Fig. 2A) . Most of the pellets were covered by a thin, mu­cous film (Fig. 2B) that constitutes the per-

itrophic membrane, as observed in other poly­chaetes (Fretter & Graham 1976).

Only a few faecal pellets were produced im­mediately after collection of worms in the Posi­donia bed (natural diet), as most of the worms had empty guts. The pellets contained a variety of plant items (Table 1): mostly diatoms and coralline algae (Fig. 2C and 2D). However, small fragments of both macro algae and Posido­nia leaves were also frequently observed in the pellets of worms of different sizes. The most abundan t genera of epiphytic diatoms found in the faecal pellets were Synedra, Rhabdone-ma, Ly­chmophora, Navicula, Grammatophora, Amphora, Diploneis. Some of these taxa are free living on the leaf surface (e.g., Amphora, Navicula, Syne­dra), or are colonial species (e.g., Lychmophora) which can be easily detached by the grazing ac­tivity of the worm or can be ingested with other epiphytized items.

The analysis of faecal pellets deriving from grazing under laboratory conditions revealed a larger variety of plant items (Table 1), dominat­ed by macroalgal tissues, regardless of worm size. The analysis of the pieces of Posidonia grazed by worms revealed no significant differ­ences in epiphyte composition and coverage with respect to the ungrazed controls, both for the upper (t= 0.279, p = 0.79) and the lower (t= 0.099, p= 0.92) leaf sides. This pattern was con-

Dow

nloa

ded

by [

Mou

nt A

lliso

n U

nive

rsity

0L

ibra

ries

] at

20:

29 1

6 A

pril

2013

Page 7: Feeding ecology of platynereis dumerilii (audouin & milne-edwards) in the seagrass posidonia oceanica system: The role of the epiphytic flora (Polychaeta, nereididae)

194 M. C. GAlYIBI ET AL.

Table 2A. Sequential analysis of the binary food choice experiments lasting 24 hours (12 in light and 12 in dark con­ditions).

tes ted items Posidonia erect epiph. (1) Posidonia erect epiph. Posidonia encrusting epiph. Posidonia erect epiph. Posidania erect epiph. Posidania. erect epiph. Posidonia erect epiph. Posidonia no epiph. Posidonia no epiph. C~stoseira crinita

Posidonia. encrusting epiph (2) Posidonia no epiph.

n.s. s.

n.s. Posidonia no epiph. Stypoeattlon Jeoparium (1) s.

n.s. n.s. n.s. n.s.

Ulva rigida (3) Dietyota diehotoma (1) Cystoseim crinita (1) Flabellia petiolata (4)

C~stoseira crinita

Caule,pa prolifera. (4) Stypocattlon scaparium (1) Caulerpa prolifera

s. n.s. n.s. s. s.

n.s.

Dietyota diehotoma Cystoseim crinita Ulva 1igida Cystoseira crinita Ulva rigida Dietyota dichotama

Table 2B. Sequential analysis of the binary food choice experiments under 12 hours of continuous dark or light con­ditions.

tested items Dark Light conditions conditions

Posidonia erect epiph. Posidonia encrusting epiph. s. s. Posidonia erect epiph. Dictyota dichotoma n.s. n.s. Posidonia erect epiph. Stypocaulon scapariurl! n.s. n.s. Posidania erect epiph. Cystoseim crinita n.s. n.s. Ulva rigida Dietyota diehotoma n.s. s. Die/yota diehotoma Cystoseim crinita n.s. n.s. Ulva rigida Cystoseim Clinita s. s. Cowllina elongala (5) Posidonia encrusting epiph. s. n.s.

s.= significant at 95% n.s.= not significant at 95% The plant items significantly preferred are those on the left column

firmed also when single items (e.g., Sphacelaria cirrosa) were considered separately. The mean epiphyte coverage of grazed leaves ranged be­tween 40 and 100% (mean 71.1±18.0%), and between 15 and 80% (mean= 30.9±19.8%) in the lower leaf side. The grazed leaves showed, however, clear feeding marks on both encrust­ing (Fig. 3A and 3B) and erect filamentous macro algae (Fig. 3C), as well as on Posidonia liv­ing tissues (Fig. 3D and Fig. 4). These marks had often a typical half-moon shape (Fig. 4), and those on Posidonia tissues were limited to samples grazed by larger worms (size 3 catego­ry, >15 mm length). The fluorescence mi­croscopy analysis revealed traces of undigested chlorophylls in the faecal pellets produced.

Food choice experiments

The plant items (Posidonia epiphytes and

algal morpho-functional groups: (1) = corticated; (2)= calcareous encrusting (3)= laminar; (4)= coriaceous (5)= calcareous articulated

macroalgae) tested during the experiments be­longed to five different morpho-functional guilds (Table 2). The results of the statistical tests for each food choice experiment are re­ported in Table 2A (p=0.95; 24 hours experi­ments) and Table 2B (p= 0.95; 12 hours experi­ments in continuous light or dark conditions).

In all the experiments, no significant differ­ent effect of worm size on food choice was de­tected. In both sets of experiments, Posidonia with erect epiphytes was preferred significantly to Posidonia with encrusting epiphytes or with­out epiphytes (Table 2A; Fig. 5). The food choice experiments showed that Posidonia with erect epiphytes was preferred only over Stypocattlon scoparittm, but not over Dictyota, Cys­toseira or Wva thalli. Posidonia leaves without epiphytes, or with coralline encrusting algae were only preferred when less attractive items,

Dow

nloa

ded

by [

Mou

nt A

lliso

n U

nive

rsity

0L

ibra

ries

] at

20:

29 1

6 A

pril

2013

Page 8: Feeding ecology of platynereis dumerilii (audouin & milne-edwards) in the seagrass posidonia oceanica system: The role of the epiphytic flora (Polychaeta, nereididae)

FEEDING ECOLOGY OF P. DUMERILII IN POSIDONIA ECOSYSTEM 195

Dark Light

100

A

Ul 80

ro [:::=J erect :::l

-0 IZZZl encrusting s: 60 '6 _ gardening .~ ~tube ;f?

40

N=49

20

0

3 2 3 2

Size category

Dark Light

100 B

80 J!l.

[:::=J erect rn :::l

IZZZl Cystoseira :-g > 60 ... gardening '6 c ~tube

~ 0 40 N=50

20

0

3 2 3 2

Size category

Fig. 5. Two examples of binary food choice experiments under 12 hours of continuous dark or light conditions: A, erect vs encrusting epiphytes; B, erect epiphytes vs Cystoseira. Note the "gardening" behaviour occurring, in both

choice experiments, only during dark conditions. 'lube" ~ specimens remain inside their tubes, no food choice.

such as macro algae characterized by high toughness (Caulerpa prolifera or Stypocaulon sea­parium), were offered (Table 2).

When Posidonia leaves with encrusting epi­phytes or without epiphytes were offered, rela­tively large portions of living Posidonia leaf tis­sues were occasionally eaten, especially along the cut edges of the leaf (Fig. 4). This be­haviour was observed in some larger P dumerilii (> 10 mm length). The grazed leaves showed very dearly the bite marks with typical 'half­moon'shape (Fig. 4).

Comparisons between the experiments un­der continuous light or dark conditions re­vealed a high consistency of the food choices

with the previous 24 hours experiments. Dur­ing light condition experiments a dear tenden­cy for the specimens to remain inside their tubes was observed, regardless of the worm's size (Fig. 5). Under light conditions, the 'gar­dening" behaviour was almost absent, while it was recorded in about 5% of the specimens during dark experiments. The 'gardening" be­haviour of P dumerilii occurred with many dif­ferent algal forms and also with epiphytized Posidonia leaves. This behaviour was also corre­lated to the size of individuals, being more fre­quent in specimens of size categories 3 and 2 (Fig. 5).

Dow

nloa

ded

by [

Mou

nt A

lliso

n U

nive

rsity

0L

ibra

ries

] at

20:

29 1

6 A

pril

2013

Page 9: Feeding ecology of platynereis dumerilii (audouin & milne-edwards) in the seagrass posidonia oceanica system: The role of the epiphytic flora (Polychaeta, nereididae)

196 M. C. GAMBl ET AL.

0.25 ,------------------------, Size 1 (total length 4-9 mm)

0.20

~ ~ 1l, 0.15 E. ]! Cii 0.10 a.

~ .)l'

0.05

A

2 3 4 0.7 ,------------------------,

Size 2 (total length 10-15 mm) 0.6

E 0.5 ~ "0

.[ 0.4

~ 0.3 a.

rl 0.2 .)l'

0.1

B

2 3 4 1.1 ,------------------------,

1.0

0.9

~ 0.8

~ 0.7 r 0.6 ]! 0.5

~ 0.4 TI 0.3 .)l'

0.2

0.1

Size 3 (total length >15 mm)

c

0.0 -'-----..b....LJ.,.U""'-----">.L.L.,.l...IO<'----'-"-.y..=----"....LL,..LI<'''--------'

2 3 4

Time (days)

= Erect epiphytes = Encrusting epiphytes = Cystoseira

Fig. 6. Daily production of faecal pellets of Platynerei.s dumerilii fed on different plant foods, as a function of worm size. CollUnns represent means, bars represent standard deviations of 5 specimens for each size category.

Faecal pellet production and pigment analysis

Mean daily production of faecal pellets by indi­viduals, under different dietary regimes across the three considered sizes, indicated that plant consumption was related to both worm size and food type. Erect epiphytic algae generated highest faecal pellet output, along with Cysta­seira and encrusting algae (Fig. 6). Size 1 worms showed such high variability that the dif­ferences in consumption of various items were not significant. Size 2 worms showed a well de-

fined pattern of feeding activity, with faecal pel­let production about twice as high with erect epiphytes as with encrusting ones. Cystoseira, however, was preferred to erect epiphytes, at least during the first two days of the experi­ment. Size 3 worms also showed a similar trend, except for Cystoseira at 1 st day (Fig. 6).

Pigment contents (chlorophyll a, band c and phaeopigments) of the faecal pellets which de­rived from various treatments showed no signif­icant differences among worm sizes (p>O.05), or among the days of the experiment (p>O.05).

Dow

nloa

ded

by [

Mou

nt A

lliso

n U

nive

rsity

0L

ibra

ries

] at

20:

29 1

6 A

pril

2013

Page 10: Feeding ecology of platynereis dumerilii (audouin & milne-edwards) in the seagrass posidonia oceanica system: The role of the epiphytic flora (Polychaeta, nereididae)

FEEDING ECOLOGY OF P DWVIERIllI IN POSIDONIA ECOSYSTEM 197

Table 3. Values of the pigment contents (pm pigm./mg faecal pellet cP) in the faecal pellets of Platynereis dwnerilii of different size categories and under different treatments.

Treatment/ size

Erect Chlo. a Chlo. b Chlo. c Phaeo. Size 1 2.85 (1.77) 0.06 (0.12) 0.58 (0.29) 0.99 SiZl'2 4.32 (0.77) 0.00 (0.15) 0.51 (0.04) 2.72 Size 3 3.37 (0.31) 0.00 (0.10) 0.47 (0.15) 2.10

Encrusting Siu 1 0.20 (0.16) 2.85 (0.00) 0.00 (0.00) 0.14 Size 2 0.16 (0.02) 0.00 (0. 00) 0.00 (0.00) 0.55 Size} 0.07 (0. 02) 0.00 (0.00) 0.00 (0. 00) 0.15

Cystoseira Size 1 0.65 (0.78) 0.13 (0.36) 0.28 (0.37) 1.83 Size 2 1.33 (0.37) 0.02 (0.04) 0.19 (0.05) 0.55 Size 3 1.24 (0.79) 0.02 (0.05) 0.17 (0.14) 0.52

Numbers are means of 4 days experiment, standard deviations are in italics in parentheses.

80,---------------------------,----------------,

70 Cll

~ 60 0. o

..Q 50

-5 -0 40 W iii ~ 30

-0 r:: ::J 20

10

2

~ Erect algae ~ Encrusting algae c=:J Cystoseira

3 100,------------,-----------------,-------------,

u

"5-.r: 0. o o :c o -0 W

80

60

iii w 40 OJ '6 r:: ::J

'#. 20

2

Size category

cs::SJ Erect algae c=:J Cystoseira

3

A

B

(0.73) (0. 97) (0.28)

(0.07) (0.18) (0.03)

(2.39) (0.20) (0.83)

Fig. 7. Percentages of the undigested chlorophyll a (A) and of chlorophyll c (B) content in the faecal pellets of Plalynereis dumerilii, according to worm size and experimental treatments.

Dow

nloa

ded

by [

Mou

nt A

lliso

n U

nive

rsity

0L

ibra

ries

] at

20:

29 1

6 A

pril

2013

Page 11: Feeding ecology of platynereis dumerilii (audouin & milne-edwards) in the seagrass posidonia oceanica system: The role of the epiphytic flora (Polychaeta, nereididae)

198 M. C. GAMBI ET AL.

Therefore, the results of the 4-day treatments were grouped to obtain an average production allowing comparisons of different plant items and worm sizes (Table 3). Size 1 worms gener­ally exhibited lower pigment contents per weight units of faecal pellets. Chlorophyll a content was consistently higher in individuals feeding on erect algae, followed by the Cysta­seim treatment. Chlorophyll b showed very low values in faecal pellets, testifying that Posidonia tissues were scarcely represented in the diet. Chlorophyll c was detectable only in the treat­ment with erect algae, where the component of brown algae was dominant, while it was not de­tectable in the treatment with encrusting algae. In this latter, in fact, Corallinaceae dominated and the diatom component was too low to be measured by spectophotometry. Chlorophyll c was relatively high in Cystoseim treatment from small-sized worms. As regards to phaeopig­ments, faecal pellets of small-sized worms fed on erect algae contained lower amount of phaeopigments than larger worms (Table 3). Small individuals fed on Cystoseim, however, produced higher amounts of phaeopigrnents than larger worms. The highest amounts of phaeopigments were produced by individuals of sizes 2 and 3 fed on erect algae (Table 3).

Values of the undigested chlorophyll a were higher for the erect algae treatment and lower for the encrusting one, regardless of worm size (Fig. 7A). Smaller worms produced faecal pel­lets with lower chlorophyll a values, indicating a higher digestive efficiency, compared witl1 larger worms. A similar picture was revealed by the undigested chlorophyll c values (Fig. 7B), although in this case small worms showed high­er ·values. On the whole, values of undigested chlorophylls, for the erect algae treatments, ranged between 40 and 60% (indicating a di­gestion efficiency between 60-40%), while for the Cystoseira treatment the undigested values were more variable, ranging between 85 and 15%, and for the encrusting algae between 15 and 5% (Fig. 7). These results indicate high ef­ficiency of digestion. However, the data regard­ing encrusting algae, may be biased by low con­sumption rates.

DISCUSSION

Present observations on feeding behaviour and food choice of P. dumerilii confirm the typical mesograzer habit of the species. The erect Posi­donia epiphytes, which were dominated in our experiments by brown, branched algae of the

genus Sphacelaria, have a relatively high struc­tural complexity, and they appear more palat­able than the encrusting coralline algae or the Posidonia leaf tissues. The present work demon­strates that P. dumerilii, when grazing, prefers erect epiphytes (both micro- and macro algae) . This pattern may be related to the morphology of the feeding apparatus of P. dumerilii. The species, in fact, has an reversible pharynx armed with a pairs of jaws (Fauchald & Jumars 1979) that are more suitable for cutting, rather than for scraping encrusting materials. To this respect P. dumerilii has a distinctive role from other mesograzers. A previous study dealing with feeding ecology of mollusc gastropods of the genus Gibbula on P. oceanica meadows showed that these animals prefer the encrust­ing algal component of the epiphytic commu­nity (Mazzella & Russo 1989), which is more easily removed by their radular apparatus. A similar research on crustacean amphipods, pointed out their preference for various mor­pho-functional forms of epiphytic diatoms, scraped by the action of their antennae (Scipi­one & Mazzella 1992). Therefore, P. dumerilii and the other mesograzers studied seem to ex­ploit different components of the epiphytic community, according to their morphological features and sizes, thus increasing their mi­croniche differentiation and reducing compe­tition for food ",>jth other grazers.

It is worthwhile to stress the capability of larger P. dumerilii (> 10 mm length) to feed on living Posidonia leaf tissues, even though this be­haviour occurred only when worms were forced to graze upon less attractive plant items, such as the coralline algae. This peculiar be­haviour is consistent with the observation ofJa­cob & Pierson (1979) on P. dumerilii living in­side the flower spathes of the seagrass Zostera marina. Therefore, P. dumerilii appears to be one of the few species of invertebrates able to graze directly on living Posidonia tissues. Sea­grass tissues, in fact, are rarely consumed by di­rect grazers, due to the fact that they are partic­ularly tough and unpalatable for their high content of structural carbohydrates (mainly lignin) (Mazzella et al. 1992), and for the pres­ence of anti-grazing compounds (Cariello & Zanetti 1979). A few other polychaete species, belonging to the Eunicidae, borers into Posida­nia scales (bases of old leaves persisting along the rhizome) (Cuidetti et al. 1997) have been documented as being capable of grazing on liv­ing Posidonia tissues in natural conditions (Cambi et al. 2000). Finally, the typical 'half-

Dow

nloa

ded

by [

Mou

nt A

lliso

n U

nive

rsity

0L

ibra

ries

] at

20:

29 1

6 A

pril

2013

Page 12: Feeding ecology of platynereis dumerilii (audouin & milne-edwards) in the seagrass posidonia oceanica system: The role of the epiphytic flora (Polychaeta, nereididae)

FEEDING ECOLOGY OF P. DUMERIIJI IN POSIDONIA ECOSYSTEM 199

moon' shaped bite marks of P dumerilii have al­so been observed by Bedford & Moore (1985) on the thalli of brown algae of the genus Lami­nana, and are still related with the shape and function of the jaws

Under light conditions individuals of P dumerilii are less active, and remain generally inside their tubes. Like in other Nereididae, al­so in P dumerilii feeding requires the partial or total exit of the worm from the tube (Cram & Evans 1980). During such searching for food, the worms are more vulnerable to potential predators. The "gardening" behaviour has been considered to be an adaptation to reduce the risks of predation (Woodin 1977). The pro­longed occurrence of P dumerilii inside the tubes, and the avoidance of "gardening" during light conditions may therefore be explained as an anti-predatory behaviour, as also hypothe­sized for other species of Nereididae (Roe 1975). These results suggest that, also in the field, P dumerilii could forage more actively at night.

Faecal pellet production, for larger worms (size categories 2 and 3), is higher for speci­mens fed on erect algae than for worms feed­ing on encrusting algae. Only small individuals (size 1) seemed to have comparable faecal pel­let production when feeding on different plant items, with micro algae as a constant compo­nent of their diet. Diatoms seem to be fed as a whole with the macro algae they epiphytize. However, a selective choice, especially in the case of small individuals, must be taken into ac­count, when we consider that the species as­semblage, identified in the faecal pellets, is dif­ferent from that found on Posidonia leaves, be­ing colonial forms not tightly attached to the substrate (Lychmophora, Navicula) more ab1.m­dant than prostrate ones (e.g., Cocconeis spp.), which are dominant on the leaves.

Platynereis dwnerilii seems therefore capable of utilizing any plant material which is easy to cut by means of its pharyngeal jaws. A selection is made mainly on less corticated macroalgae. The consumption of plant material is function of worm size. It increases in larger worms, which can consume larger items, that are prob­ably unaccessible for small specimens. Small in­dividuals shifted their diet to microphytes, when forced to graze on tough materials. How­ever, in spite of their lower rate of feeding, small-sized worms showed a higher digestive ef­ficiency, demonstrated by the lower percent­ages of undigested chlorophyll a.

The feeding pattern of P dumerilii in P ocean-

ica meadows seems to be limited more by the anatomy of its feeding apparatus rather than by the quality of available food. In fact, the large variety of plant items ingested suggests a cer­tain degree of fceding adaptability, especially in large individuals. This species is able to use all the plant materials present on the Posidonia leaves, but erect epiphytes are preferred to all the other items. Posidonia tissues are scarcely utilized and small individuals feed mainly on microalgae, finding other plant materials diffi­cult to cut.

The pattern of occurrence of P dumerilii in Posidonia meadows, with higher abundances on the leaf stratum and during the summer sea­son, is consistent with the pattern of epiphyte production, which reach the highest develop­ment in summer, especially in shallow water (Mazzella et al. 1989). A similar pattern of co­occurrence has been observed in Posidonia for another mesograzer, the decapod Hippolyte iner­mis, for which a clear relationship between epi­phyte availability, and shrimp diet and life cycle was evidentiated (Zupo, 1994).

The data on P dumerilii, as well as those of the other mesograzers studied, demonstrate once more the link between the structural di­versity offered by plant epiphytes of the P oceanica ecosystem, and the functional diversity of its associate invertebrates.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Specimens of P dumerilii were collected by SCUBA diving at Castello Aragonese (Island of Ischia, Gulf of Naples), along a shallow rocky shore (0-3 m depth), characterized by an algal community dominated by brown (Cystoseira crinita Duby and Stypocaulon scopanum (L.) Ki.i.tzing), and by green (Cladophora sp.) algae, and in a nearby shallow P oceanica meadow. In the hard bottom worms were sampled by col­lecting and shaking the algae; while in the Posi­donia meadow worms were sampled from the leaf stratum by means of a hand-towed net (Russo et al. 1985), and also by collection of Posidonia shoots and visual analysis of the leaf blades. All samples were collected during late morning hours, so the possibility of a day-cycle in the feeding, and therefore in the gut full­ness, of the worms was not tested. Specimens of P dumerilii sampled were separated into three size categories, based on their body length: viz. size 1 «9 mm); size 2 (9-15 mm); size 3 (>15 mm). Worms were reared in Petri dishes and kept at a constant temperature of 19°C. Water

Dow

nloa

ded

by [

Mou

nt A

lliso

n U

nive

rsity

0L

ibra

ries

] at

20:

29 1

6 A

pril

2013

Page 13: Feeding ecology of platynereis dumerilii (audouin & milne-edwards) in the seagrass posidonia oceanica system: The role of the epiphytic flora (Polychaeta, nereididae)

200 M. C. GAMBI ET AL.

in Petri dishes was renewed daily using filtered and aerated seawater. In order to avoid in­traspecific aggressive behaviour, common in nereidpolychaetes (Reish & Alosi 1968), all the experiments were done on isolated individuals. All the worms used for our experiments were in the atokous stage (no mature gametes). Vari­ous experiments were devised:

Identification of natural diet (Posidonia meadow)

Specimens of P dumerilii collected in the shal­low P oceanica meadow were immediately isolat­ed in Petri dishes after collection and were ob­served every hours until faecal pellets were pro­duced. The faecal pellets were immediately re­moved and analysed at the microscope in order to identify the items ingested in natural condi­tions. Matelial was also fixed for the scanning electron microscopy (S.E.M.) analysis in order to identify the diatoms; faecal pellets were de­hydrated in ethanol, critical-point dried with CO2 and coated with carbon and gold before observation with a Philips 505 instrument.

Effects of grazing on the epiphytic community

Small pieces of Posidonia leaves (1 cm length), epiphytized by encrusting or erect algae, were offered to worms that have been starved for two days. The pieces of Posidonia leaves used in the feeding experiments were examined before grazing initiated in order to identify the major algal epiphytes and determine their percent of coverage. The same pieces were examined again for traces of grazing activity, after 2 days of worm feeding, to detect changes in composi­tion and coverage of epiphytes. In all the analy­ses, both sides of each leaf (upper and lower) were examined separately, as the epiphytic community differs between the two leaf sides (Casola et aL 1987). The Student's test was per­formed to evaluate statistical difference in cov­erage data before and after the grazing experi­ments. The feeding experiments were per­formed on worms of different sizes reared in a thermostatic chamber at 19°C and with a day length of 12 hours. Faecal pellets were re­moved daily and divided into sub-samples used for observation by optical microscopy, fluores­cence microscopy, or fixed and processed for S.E.M. as illustrated above.

Food choice experiments

These experiments were done utilizing various

species of macroalgae and differently epiphy­tized Posidonia leaves. The tested macroalgae were Cystoseim crinita Duby, Dictyota dichotoma (Hudson) Lamouroux, Ulva rigida C. Agardh, Stypocaulon scoparium (L) Ki.itzing, Flabellia peti­olata (Turra) Nizamuddin, Caulerpa prolifera (Forsskal) Lamouroux and Co-rallina elongata Ellis & Solander. The first set of experiments lasted 24 hours, with a light-dark cycle of 12 hours. The animals were checked at 2, 4, 6, 12 and 24 hours intervals, by recording their posi­tion inside the offered plant items, and the oc­currence of the "gardening" behaviour, char­acterized by the presence of the worm in one of the items and the attachment of the other item at the tube.

The second set of experiments was done to study the behavioural differences between light and dark conditions. A binary food choice ex­periment was tested after 12 hours of continu­ous light, and then after a period of starvation of 1 day, the same food choice was tested after 12 hours of continuous dark conditions. In each experiment, pieces of the various plant items (ca. 1 cm long) were offered in binary choices to P dumerilii individuals; smaller pieces of the same items (ca. 0.5 cm long) were offered to small worms (size 1 category). The items were placed at equal distances from each worm, that was generally inside its mucous tube. Different combinations of binary food choices were performed with the selected plant items, for a total of30 experiments, 14 of which lasted 24 hours, and 16 lasted 12 hours under continuous light (8) or dark (8) conditions. Each binary choice experiment was done on about 50 individuals, in a single triaL The re­sults of all binary food choice experiments were tested using the graphical method of the Sequential Analysis (Lison 1961).

Faecal pellet production and digestion efficiency

Based on the results of the previous qualitative observations, quantitative evaluation of the amount of material ingested, the weight of fae­cal pellets produced and the efficiency of di­gestion were restricted to the preferred plant items. Each experiment lasted 4 days. Five worms of each size category were reared indi­vidually in Petri dishes filled with filtered sea water containing a small portion of the plant items under test. Faecal pellets were removed daily using a Pasteur pipette under a dissection microscope, ·and the water renewed. The faecal

Dow

nloa

ded

by [

Mou

nt A

lliso

n U

nive

rsity

0L

ibra

ries

] at

20:

29 1

6 A

pril

2013

Page 14: Feeding ecology of platynereis dumerilii (audouin & milne-edwards) in the seagrass posidonia oceanica system: The role of the epiphytic flora (Polychaeta, nereididae)

FEEDING ECOLOGY OF P DUlvIERlL1I IN POSIDONIA ECOSYSTEM 201

pellets produced by individuals belonging to the same size group were pooled, and blotted with filter paper. Five ml 90% buffered acetone solution was added, and samples stored at about sac. Finally, the solutions were cen­trifuged, faecal pellets were removed, washed in distilled water, dried (soac, 24 hours) and weighed, in order to assess the amount of mate­rial egested throughout the experiment.

The chlorophyll a, band c contents in the su­pernatant was analysed by spectrophotometry, and evaluated by spectrophotometric equa­tions Qeffrey & Humphrey 1975). When the absorbance was too low to be detected by spec­trophotometry, the solution was analysed using a fluorometer, in order only to estimate the content of chlorophyll a (Lorenzen 1967). The solution was then acidified, adding two drops of 50% hydrochloric acid (HCl), and re-anal­ysecl, in order to calculate the content in phaeopigments according to Lorenzen (1967).

The pigment content of the fresh algae used for grazing experiments was measured at ap­propriate absorbance using spectrophotomet­ric analyses, after grinding in chilled 90% ace­tone solution, and centrifuging. Dry weight (80 a C, 24 hours) of the plant material was de­termined in order to refer pigment concentra­tions to weight units. The differences between values for pigments in fresh algal items and those in the faecal pellets were calculated, and the values expressed as percentages of the undigested chlorophyll contents. This proce­dure allowed to evaluate the digestion efficien­cy of worms with respect to the chlorophylls, but does not take into account the degradation of the whole organic matter of the ingested food.

Acknowledgements. We wish to thank Dr Maria A Di Meglio for collaboration in data collection and laborato­ry rearing of Platynereis d"Umerilii. The Electron Mi­croscopy Service of the Stazione Zoologica of Naples provided the technical support for the S.E.M. micro­graphs. Two anonymous referees provided constructive comments that improved the paper. This project has been funded by the European Community (Environ­mental projects, ref. EV4V-039B, and STEP-0063C).

REFERENCES

Bedford, AP. & P.G. Moore 1985. Macrofaunal involve­ment in the sublittoral decay of kelp debris: the poly­chaete Platynereis dumerilii (Audouin & Milne-Ed­wards) (Annelida: Polychaeta). - Estua·rine Coastal & Shelf Science 20 (2): 117-134.

Branch, G.M., J-M. Harris, R.H. Parkins, R.H. Busta­mante & S. Eekhout 1992. Algal 'gardening' by graz-

ers: a comparison of ecological effects of territorial fish and limpets. - In D.M. John, SJ Hawkins &.f.H. Price (eds): Plant-Animal Interactions in the !vIarine Ben­thos, pp. 405-423. Systematics Association Special Vol­ume, 46, Clarendon Press, Oxford.

Brawley, S.H. 1992. Mesoherbivory. - In D.M. John, SJ. Hawkins &J-H. Price (eds): Plant-Animal Interactions in the JvImine Benthos, pp. 235-263. Systematics Associa­tion Special Volume 46, Clarendon Press, Oxford.

Buia, M.C. 1989. Macroflora epifita delle lamine fogliari di Posidonia oceanica: Corallinaceae incrostanti. - Oe­balial5-1 N.S.: 293-296.

Cariello, L. & L. Zanetti 1979. Effects of Posidonia oceani­ca extracts on the growth of StaphylococC1.Ls aUTeus. -Botanica Ma·rina 22: 269-285.

Casanova, G. & J- Coulon-Roso 1967. Sur Ie comporte­ment alimentaire de Plalynereis rrur.ssiliensis (Moquin­Tandon). - Compte lUnd!! Hebdomadai,.e des Seances de l'fl.cadbnie des Sciences. Paris 264 serie D: 2152-2153.

Casola, E., M. Scardi, L. Mazzella & E. Fresi 1987. Struc­ture of the epiphytic community of Posidonia oceanica leaves in a shallow meadow. - ps.z.N.I. Ma·ri?ll' Ecology 8: 285-296.

Cram, A & S.M. Evans 1980. Stability and lability in the evolution of behaviour in nereid polychaetes. - Ani­mal Behavimtr 28: 483-490.

Evans, S.M. & P J Downie 1986. Decision-making pro­cesses in the polychaete Platynereis dumerilii. - Animal BehaviouT34: 472-479.

Fauchald, K. & P. A. Jumars 1979. The diet of worms: a study of polychaete feeding guilds. - Oceanography and Mmine Biology: an Annual Review 17: 193-284.

Fretter, V. & A Graham 1976. A Junctional anatomy oj in­vertearates. Academic Press (London): 161-224.

Gambi, M.C., A Giangrande, M. Martinelli & L.A Ches­sa 1995. Polychaetes of Posidonia oceanica bed off Sar­dinia (Italy): spatia-temporal distribution and feeding guild analysis. - Scientia Marina 59(2): 129-141.

Gambi, M.C. & P. Lanera 1992. Polychaetes of the leaf stratum of a Posidonia oceanica bed: spatial and season­al analyses. - Rapports Commission international Explo­ration Mer Miditerranee 33: 39.

Gambi, M.e., M. Lorenti, G.F. Russo, M.B. Scipione & V. Zupo 1992. Depth and seasonal distribution of some groups of the vagile fauna of the Posidonia oceanica leaf stratum: structural and trophic analyses. - PS.Z.N.I. Marine Ecology 13 (1): 17-39.

Gambi, M.e. & M. A Di Meglio 1996. Observations on feeding behaviour and food choice in the herbivore polychaete Platynereis dwnerilii (Nereididae). - In G. Albertelli, A De Maio & M. Piccazzo (eds): Proceedings 11 0 Congresso Associazione Italiana Oceanologia e Limnolo­gia (Sorrento 26-28 Ot/oare 1994), pp. 779-791. Lang for AIOL, Genova (Italy).

Gambi M.e., v. Zupo & M. Lorenti, 2000. Organism bor­ers of Posidonia oceanica scales: trophic role and eco­logical implications for the ecosystem. - Biologia Mari­na Mediterranea 7(1): 253-261.

Giangrande, A 1988. Polychaete zonation and its rela­tion to algal distribution down a vertical cliff in the western Mediterranean (Italy): a structural analysis.­Journal Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 120: 263-276.

Grant, A 1989. The reproductive cycle of Plat.ynereis dum.erilii (Audouin & Milne-Edwards) (Polychaeta: Nereidae) from the Firth of Clyde. - Sarsia 74: 79-84.

Dow

nloa

ded

by [

Mou

nt A

lliso

n U

nive

rsity

0L

ibra

ries

] at

20:

29 1

6 A

pril

2013

Page 15: Feeding ecology of platynereis dumerilii (audouin & milne-edwards) in the seagrass posidonia oceanica system: The role of the epiphytic flora (Polychaeta, nereididae)

202 M. C. GAMBI ET AL.

Guidetti, P., S. Bussotti S., M.C. Gambi & M. Lorenti 1997. Invertebrate borers in Posidonia oceanica scales: relationship between their distribution and lepi­dochronological parameters. - Aq·uatic Botany &8: 151-164.

Hay, M.E., P.E. Renaud & W. Fenical 1988. Large mobile versus small sedentary herbivores and their resistance to seaweed chemical defenses. - Oecologia 75: 245-252.

Hawkins, SJ., R.G. Hartnoll, JM. Kain & T.A. Norton 1992. Plant-animal interactions on hard substrata in the north-east Atlantic. -In. D.M.John, SJ. Hawkins & JH. Price (eds): Plant-Animal Interactions in the Marine Benthos, pp. 1-34. Systematics Association Special Vol­ume, 46, Clarendon Press, Oxford.

Hudon, C. & P. Legendre 1987. The ecological implica­tions of grOWtll forms in epibenthic diatoms. - joumal of Phycology 23: 434-44l.

Hutchings, P.A. 1982. The fauna of Australian seagrass beds. - Proceedings Linnean Society New South Wales 106: 181-200.

Jacob, R.P.W.M. & E.S. Pierson 1979. Zostera maTina spathes as a habitat for PlatyneTl:is dumerilii (Audouin & Milne-Edwards, 1834). - Aquatic Botany 6: 403-406.

Jeffrey, S.W. & G.F. Humphrey 1975. New spectrophoto­metric method for determining chlorophyll a, b, Cj

and c2 in algae, phytoplankton and higher plants. -Biochemical Physiology 167: 191-194.

Lanera, P. & M.C. Gambi 1993. Polychaete distribution in some Cymodocea nodosa meadows around the Island of Ischia (Gulf of Naples, Italy). - Oehalia 19: 89-103.

Lison, L. 1961. Statistica applicata alla Biologia Sperimen­tale. Casa Editrice Ambrosiana. 381 pp.

Littler, M.M. & D.S. Littler 1980. The evolution of thal­lus form and survival strategies in benthic macro al­gae: field and laboratory tests of a functional form model. - American Naturalist 116: 25-44.

Lorenzen, CJ. 1967. Determination of chlorophylls and phaeopigments. Spectrophotometric equations. -Limnology and Oceanography 12: 343-346.

Mazzella, L., M.e. Buia, M.C. Gamhi, M. Lorenti, G.F. Russo, M.B. Scipione & V. Zupo 1992. Plant-animal trophic relationships in the Posidonia oceanica ecosys­tem ·of the Mediterranean Sea: a review. - In D.M. John, SJ. Hawkins &JH. Price (eds): Plant-AnimalIn­teractions in the MaTine Benthos, pp. 165-187. Systemat­ics Association Special Volume, 46, Clarendon Press, Oxford.

Mazzella, L., M.e. Buia & L. Spinoccia 1994. Biodiversity of epiphytic diatom community on leaves of Posidonia oceanica. - In D. Marino & M. Montresor (eds): Pro­ceedings of the 13th International Diatom Symposium,

Maratea (Italy) 1-7 September 1994, pp. 241-251. Bio­press Limited, Bristol.

Mazzella, L. & G.F. Russo 1989. Grazing effects of two Gib&ula species (Mollusca, Archaeogastropoda) on the epiphytic community of Posidonia oceanica leaves. -Aquatic Botany 35: 357-373.

Mazzella, L., M.B. Scipione & M.C. Buia 1989. Spatio­temporal distlibution of algal and animal communi­ties in a Posidonia oceanica (L.) Delile meadow. -PS.l.N.1. Marine Ecology 10: 107-13l.

Mazzella, L. & V. Zupo 1995. Reti trofiche e flussi di en­ergia nei sistemi a fanerogame marine. - Giornale Botanico Italiano 129 (1): 337-350.

Orth RJ. &J van Montfrans 1984. Epiphyte-seagrass re­lationships with an emphasis on the role of micro­grazing: a review. - Aquatic Botany 18: 43-69.

Pfannenstiel, H.D., C. Grunig &J Lucht 1987. Gameto­genesis and reproduction in nereidid sibling species (Plat.vnereis dumerilii and P massiliensis). - Bulletin of the Biologiml Society of Washington 7: 272-279.

Reish, DJ. & M.e. Alosi 1968. Aggressive behaviour in the polychaetous annelid family N ereidae. - Bulletin of Societ)1 California Acaderny of Sciences 67 (1): 21-28.

Roe, P. 1975. Aspects of life history and territorial be­haviour in young individuals of Platynereis bicanaliwla­ta and Nereis vexillosa (Annelida, Polychaeta). - Pacific Science 29 (4): 341-348.

Russo, G.F., D. Vinci & E. Fresi, 1985. The hand-towed net method for direct sampling in Posidonia oceanica beds. - Rapports Commission internationale Exploration iVler Mediterranee 29 (6): 175-177.

Scipione, M.B., M.C. Gambi, M. Lorenti, G.F. Russo & V. Zupo 1996. Vagile fauna of the leaf stratum of Posido­nia oceanica and Cymodocea nodosa in the Mediter­ranean Sea. - In J Kuo, R.C. Phillips, D.I. Walker & H. Kirkman (eds): Seagmss Biology: Proceedings of an In­ternational Workshop. Rottnest Island. Western Australia, 25-29 january 1996, pp. 249-260.

Scipione, M.B. & L. Mazzella 1992. Epiphytic diatoms in the diet of crustacean amphipods of Posidonia oceanica leaf stratum. - Oebalia, sup pI. 17: 409-412.

Steneck, RS. & L. Watling 1982. Feeding capabilities and limitation of herbivore molluscs: a functional group approach. - Marine Biology 68: 299-319.

Woodin, S.A. 1977. Algal gardening behaviour by nereid polychaetes: effects on soft-bottom commllniy struc­ture. - Marine Biology 44: 39-42.

Zupo, V. 1994. Strategies of sexual inversion in Hippolyte inermis Leach (Crustacea, Decapoda) from a Mediter­ranean seagrass meadow. -journal Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 178: 131-145.

Dow

nloa

ded

by [

Mou

nt A

lliso

n U

nive

rsity

0L

ibra

ries

] at

20:

29 1

6 A

pril

2013


Recommended