Date post: | 29-Dec-2015 |
Category: |
Documents |
Upload: | gervase-parks |
View: | 213 times |
Download: | 0 times |
FESPForum for European Structural
Proteomics“A policy-oriented forum* for European structural genomics/proteomics to assess infrastructures and set a strategic research agenda”
Who is coordinating FESP?
•Lucia Banci - Italy•Wolfgang Baumeister - Germany
•Udo Heinemann - Germany•Gunter Schneider - Sweden (Eurosync)
•Joel Sussman* - Israel
http://www.ec-fesp.org
*Funded by the EC as a SSA (specific support action)
3D-EM
X-ray Crystallography
BIOXHIT
3D-EM
VIZIER 3D-REPERTOIRE
European Structural Genomics in FP5* & FP6
NMR
IP
NoE+ protein production
+ STREPs+ protein production
+ STREPs
CA, STREP
E-MEPTargeted
SG initiative
NMR-Life
FSG-V-RNA
NDDPUPMAN
IMPS
HT3DEM
Extend-NMR
SPINE*
2006
What do we need?
• A refined analysis of the resources available and the gaps identified
• A set of strategic objectives for Structural Genomics/Proteomics (SG/SP) in Europe
• The identification of opportunities
• The commitment of the main stakeholders
– Scientists: acadmic & biotech/pharma
– Funding agencies: European & national
– Politicians
Synchrotrons in Europe
Workshop "Future Needs for Research Infrastructures in Biomedical Sciences“, Brussels, 16-03-05
current
Xfuture
large
From the idea to the think-tank: The Forum for European Structural
Proteomics
2003 2004 2005 2006 2007
• October 2003: SG workshop in Brussels
• June 2004: call for proposals
• July 2004: Eurosync meeting
• November 2004: FESP proposal (including Eurosync)
• December 2004: FESP presentation at the 1st EU projects meeting in Barcelona
• January-June 2005: First meetings, positive evaluation, project negotiations
• July 2005: Official start of the project
• 2006: FP7 preparation and launching
• June 2007: Official end of the project
FESP may help in…• Defining the field and the objectives: they provide the basis for the future research priorities.
• Assessing the needs for example by a detailed study on the availability and performance of the infrastructures and national resources.
• Identifying the bottlenecks and co-ordinating the efforts in addressing them in a joint effort.
• Building gateways between disciplines to train our first generation of “Structural Genomicists”.
• Giving visibility to the field by highlighting its achievements
OBJECTIVE: The definition of a long-term EU strategy for Structural Biology
Some specific objectives Assessment of Infrastructures in Europe:
synchrotrons (EUROSYNC), NMR facilities, EM, protein production, bioinfomatics…
Clustering/networking, establishing discussion fora and gateways between disciplines & projects; and industry (pharma/biotech).
To disseminate best practices and success stories related to the big collaborative projects, national and worldwide initiatives.
To debate and elaborate a proposal on the current/future policies needed for SG/SP in Europe (at national and European levels).
To get media and institutional visibility by highlighting the achievements and challenges of SG/SP in a position paper).
3D-EM
UPMANNDDP
GeneFun
We need to be able: ’to see
biomolecules & complexes dancing
in the cell’*
*Dino Moras (Montecatini, IT, 31-Aug-2005)
http://www.ec-fesp.org
FESP: Forum for European Structural Genomics
EuroSync: •European Synchrotron Radiation Users Group
• EuroSync: Steering Committee
(5 members)
• EuroSync Reference Group
(16 users, 4 synchrotron representatives)
Objectives of EuroSync
Assessment of synchrotrons from a users perspective
• Survey of available MX beam lines in Europe
• Present/future status of these beam lines
• Current and future beam time requirements for SG/SP in
particular and structural biology in general
• What type of beam lines and associated infrastructure will SG/SP
users require
• Is there a need for dedicated beam lines for SG/SP