+ All Categories
Home > Documents > Fetal Diagnosis of Interrupted Aortic Arch_Vogel2010

Fetal Diagnosis of Interrupted Aortic Arch_Vogel2010

Date post: 03-Sep-2014
Category:
Upload: rrodriguezg1
View: 24 times
Download: 2 times
Share this document with a friend
8
Fetal Diagnosis of Interrupted Aortic Arch Melanie Vogel, MD a,b , Margaret M. Vernon, MD a,b , Doff B. McElhinney, MD a,b , David W. Brown, MD a,b , Steven D. Colan, MD a,b , and Wayne Tworetzky, MD a,b, * To determine the frequency of prenatal detection among liveborn patients with an inter- rupted aortic arch (IAA), the accuracy of prenatal diagnosis, and the anatomic features associated with IAA in the fetus. The prenatal diagnosis of an IAA is challenging. The data on the features and outcomes of fetal IAA are limited. This was a retrospective review of the fetuses and neonates diagnosed with IAA at the Children’s Hospital Boston. From 1988 to 2009, 26 fetuses were diagnosed with an IAA. Of these, 21 were live born, and 5 pregnancies were terminated. Of these 21 patients, 18 were confirmed to have an IAA after birth and 3 had severe aortic coarctation. Of the 56 patients diagnosed with an IAA as neonates, 3 had a prenatal echocardiogram that did not include the correct diagnosis. Among the liveborn patients with a postnatally confirmed IAA, 24% were diagnosed prenatally, which increased from 11% during the first 7-year period to 43% more recently. Also, 15% of the prenatally diagnosed patients with IAA had a family history of structural or genetic anomalies. In fetuses with an IAA, echocardiographic Z-scores for the aortic valve and ascending aorta were significantly lower than in normal fetuses, but the left ventricular dimensions were normal. Aortopulmonary diameter ratios were abnormally low. In conclusion, although the identification of IAA on a prenatal echocardiogram can be challenging, a number of anatomic features can facilitate the diagnosis. In particular, a low aortopulmonary diameter ratio in the absence of a ventricular size discrepancy should prompt consideration of this diagnosis. Despite the diagnostic challenges, the frequency of prenatal diagnosis of the IAA is increasing. © 2010 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. (Am J Cardiol 2010;105:727–734) An interrupted aortic arch (IAA) is a rare, but serious, anomaly in which a proportion of the systemic circulation is ductal dependent in the neonatal period. 1,2 Imaging of the aortic arch in the fetus can be challenging, and it can be difficult to distinguish the ductal arch from the aortic arch. The current recommendations for screening on the obstetric fetal anomaly scan include identification of a 4-chamber view, all 4 valves, and the outflow tracts, all of which can appear to be normal to the ultrasonographer in fetuses with conotruncal anomalies. 3,4 Other than case reports, essentially no published data are available concerning the prenatal diagnosis of IAA, and, as such, the frequency, accuracy, outcomes, and specific ana- tomic features of fetuses with an IAA have not been char- acterized. 4 –10 The aim of the present study was to determine the frequency of prenatal detection among liveborn patients with an IAA, the accuracy of the prenatal diagnosis of an IAA, and the specific anatomic features associated with an IAA in the fetus that should alert ultrasonographers to the presence of a significant heart defect. The ascending aortic flow might be lower than normal in fetuses with an IAA, owing to the ductal supply of the entire lower body circu- lation and often the left subclavian artery. Therefore, it was hypothesized that the Z-scores for the aortic valve (AoV) annulus and ascending aortic diameters would be lower than in the normal population, that the pulmonary valve annulus and main pulmonary artery Z-scores would be greater than in the normal population, and that the AoV/pulmonary valve and ascending aorta/main pulmonary artery ratios would be abnormally low. Methods Fetuses and neonates diagnosed with an IAA were ascertained by searching the database of the cardiovas- cular program at the Children’s Hospital Boston (Boston, Massachusetts), using the diagnostic codes for all types of IAA. Patients suspected to have an IAA prenatally who were found to have another diagnosis after birth were also included. The postnatal cohort only included patients who presented to our institution at 1 month of age. Patients with additional major cardiac anomalies who also had IAA, such as transposition of the great arteries, double-outlet right ventricle, and truncus arteri- osus, were excluded. The following demographic and historical data were obtained: gestational age at diagno- sis, family history of congenital heart disease, a previous serious fetal anomaly or chromosomal defect, pregnancy outcome, and postnatal outcome. The assigned prenatal and postnatal diagnoses were taken from the official echocardiogram report. The diag- nosis of IAA was specified as type A (interruption after a Department of Cardiology, Children’s Hospital Boston, Boston, Mas- sachusetts; and b Department of Pediatrics, Harvard Medical School, Bos- ton, Massachusetts. Manuscript received August 12, 2009; revised manu- script received and accepted October 25, 2009. This study was supported by contributions from the Kenrose Kitchen Table Foundation, Gig Harbor, Washington. *Corresponding author: Tel: (617) 355-8967; fax: (617) 738-6289. E-mail address: [email protected] (W. Tworetzky). 0002-9149/10/$ – see front matter © 2010 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. www.AJConline.org doi:10.1016/j.amjcard.2009.10.053
Transcript
Page 1: Fetal Diagnosis of Interrupted Aortic Arch_Vogel2010

adadTfvac

astatwIIpfl

sts

T

0d

Fetal Diagnosis of Interrupted Aortic Arch

Melanie Vogel, MDa,b, Margaret M. Vernon, MDa,b, Doff B. McElhinney, MDa,b,David W. Brown, MDa,b, Steven D. Colan, MDa,b, and Wayne Tworetzky, MDa,b,*

To determine the frequency of prenatal detection among liveborn patients with an inter-rupted aortic arch (IAA), the accuracy of prenatal diagnosis, and the anatomic featuresassociated with IAA in the fetus. The prenatal diagnosis of an IAA is challenging. The dataon the features and outcomes of fetal IAA are limited. This was a retrospective review ofthe fetuses and neonates diagnosed with IAA at the Children’s Hospital Boston. From 1988to 2009, 26 fetuses were diagnosed with an IAA. Of these, 21 were live born, and 5pregnancies were terminated. Of these 21 patients, 18 were confirmed to have an IAA afterbirth and 3 had severe aortic coarctation. Of the 56 patients diagnosed with an IAA asneonates, 3 had a prenatal echocardiogram that did not include the correct diagnosis.Among the liveborn patients with a postnatally confirmed IAA, 24% were diagnosedprenatally, which increased from 11% during the first 7-year period to 43% more recently.Also, 15% of the prenatally diagnosed patients with IAA had a family history of structuralor genetic anomalies. In fetuses with an IAA, echocardiographic Z-scores for the aorticvalve and ascending aorta were significantly lower than in normal fetuses, but the leftventricular dimensions were normal. Aortopulmonary diameter ratios were abnormallylow. In conclusion, although the identification of IAA on a prenatal echocardiogram can bechallenging, a number of anatomic features can facilitate the diagnosis. In particular, a lowaortopulmonary diameter ratio in the absence of a ventricular size discrepancy shouldprompt consideration of this diagnosis. Despite the diagnostic challenges, the frequency ofprenatal diagnosis of the IAA is increasing. © 2010 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. (Am

J Cardiol 2010;105:727–734)

olhaiaivw

M

acMowwpawaohsso

t

An interrupted aortic arch (IAA) is a rare, but serious,nomaly in which a proportion of the systemic circulation isuctal dependent in the neonatal period.1,2 Imaging of theortic arch in the fetus can be challenging, and it can beifficult to distinguish the ductal arch from the aortic arch.he current recommendations for screening on the obstetric

etal anomaly scan include identification of a 4-chamberiew, all 4 valves, and the outflow tracts, all of which canppear to be normal to the ultrasonographer in fetuses withonotruncal anomalies.3,4

Other than case reports, essentially no published data arevailable concerning the prenatal diagnosis of IAA, and, asuch, the frequency, accuracy, outcomes, and specific ana-omic features of fetuses with an IAA have not been char-cterized.4–10 The aim of the present study was to determinehe frequency of prenatal detection among liveborn patientsith an IAA, the accuracy of the prenatal diagnosis of an

AA, and the specific anatomic features associated with anAA in the fetus that should alert ultrasonographers to theresence of a significant heart defect. The ascending aorticow might be lower than normal in fetuses with an IAA,

aDepartment of Cardiology, Children’s Hospital Boston, Boston, Mas-achusetts; and bDepartment of Pediatrics, Harvard Medical School, Bos-on, Massachusetts. Manuscript received August 12, 2009; revised manu-cript received and accepted October 25, 2009.

This study was supported by contributions from the Kenrose Kitchenable Foundation, Gig Harbor, Washington.

*Corresponding author: Tel: (617) 355-8967; fax: (617) 738-6289.

nE-mail address: [email protected] (W. Tworetzky).

002-9149/10/$ – see front matter © 2010 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.oi:10.1016/j.amjcard.2009.10.053

wing to the ductal supply of the entire lower body circu-ation and often the left subclavian artery. Therefore, it wasypothesized that the Z-scores for the aortic valve (AoV)nnulus and ascending aortic diameters would be lower thann the normal population, that the pulmonary valve annulusnd main pulmonary artery Z-scores would be greater thann the normal population, and that the AoV/pulmonaryalve and ascending aorta/main pulmonary artery ratiosould be abnormally low.

ethods

Fetuses and neonates diagnosed with an IAA werescertained by searching the database of the cardiovas-ular program at the Children’s Hospital Boston (Boston,assachusetts), using the diagnostic codes for all types

f IAA. Patients suspected to have an IAA prenatallyho were found to have another diagnosis after birthere also included. The postnatal cohort only includedatients who presented to our institution at �1 month ofge. Patients with additional major cardiac anomaliesho also had IAA, such as transposition of the great

rteries, double-outlet right ventricle, and truncus arteri-sus, were excluded. The following demographic andistorical data were obtained: gestational age at diagno-is, family history of congenital heart disease, a previouserious fetal anomaly or chromosomal defect, pregnancyutcome, and postnatal outcome.

The assigned prenatal and postnatal diagnoses wereaken from the official echocardiogram report. The diag-

osis of IAA was specified as type A (interruption after

www.AJConline.org

Page 2: Fetal Diagnosis of Interrupted Aortic Arch_Vogel2010

ttudmuamgdstt

ldambt2rdtIc

Fvs conoven

728 The American Journal of Cardiology (www.AJConline.org)

he origin of the left subclavian artery), type B (interrup-ion after the origin of the left common carotid artery), ornspecified. The presence and type of ventricular septalefect (VSD) was recorded. Echocardiographic measure-ents were made off-line by one observer who was

naware of the patient outcomes. All studies obtainedfter 2004 were recorded in Digital Imaging and Com-unications in Medicine format. For earlier echocardio-

rams that were stored on videotape, the studies wereigitized and measurements made from the digital ver-ion. The anatomic structures measured included the mi-ral and tricuspid valve diameters (valve hinge points at

igure 1. Fetal echocardiographic images showing (A) 4-chamber view wientricle; (B) 3-vessel view, with a large pulmonary artery juxtaposed aguperior vena cava (S); and (C) modified 4-chamber view showing large

he annulus during the maximum opening in diastole), m

eft ventricular (LV) and right ventricular lengths at end-iastole, LV short-axis dimension at end-diastole, AoVnd pulmonary valve, and ascending aorta and main pul-onary artery diameters in systole. Gestational age-

ased Z-scores were calculated from unpublished norma-ive data collected at Children’s Hospital Boston from005 to 2007 from 232 normal fetuses. To optimize theeporting of the diagnostic accuracy of the fetal echocar-iographic findings and the estimates of the frequency ofhe prenatal diagnosis, the data from newborns with anAA not diagnosed prenatally at our center were alsoollected to ascertain whether a fetal diagnosis had been

al relative dimensions of right atrium, left atrium, right ventricle, and leftsmall ascending aorta (arrow), which is located immediately anterior totricular septal defect (*).

th normainst a

ade elsewhere. The postnatal echocardiograms and re-

Page 3: Fetal Diagnosis of Interrupted Aortic Arch_Vogel2010

pt

tnpodT

cudp

R

Fd(b on co

729Congenital Heart Disease/Interrupted Aortic Arch in the Fetus

orts were reviewed to assess for discrepancies betweenhe pre- and postnatal diagnosis.

The diagnostic and outcome data are reported in descrip-ive fashion. A comparison of the gestational age at diag-osis between the liveborn and terminated pregnancies waserformed using the Wilcoxon rank sum test. A comparisonf categorical data between groups (eg, pre- and postnatallyiagnosed patients) was performed using Fisher’s exact test.

igure 2. Echocardiographic images in fetus with IAA showing (A) ductaescending aorta (DAo); (B) ascending aorta separating from the ductal arY appearance); (C) another view of the Y appearance, with the ascendingifurcation); and (D) separation of ascending aorta (AAO) and ductal arch

he echocardiographic data from the fetuses with an IAA were a

ompared with a normative population (mean Z-score � 0)sing a 1-sample t test. A comparison of the serial echocar-iograms in fetuses with 2 studies was performed using aaired t test analysis.

esults

From June 1988 through April 2009, 26 fetuses and 56

(arrows), which can be mistaken for the aortic arch, continuing into theing straight cranially, and branching into the first brachiocephalic vesselsranching into the innominate and left common carotid arteries (arrow at

lor flow imaging.

l archch, runn

aorta b

dditional neonates �30 days old were diagnosed with an

Page 4: Fetal Diagnosis of Interrupted Aortic Arch_Vogel2010

Iwftw1ftfdIF

fptcftt

ttbst“bwIw

tst14thn

pp

TP

P

L

P

P

p

fi

TPc

F

F

F

M

P

P

M

P

S

M

M

n

730 The American Journal of Cardiology (www.AJConline.org)

AA at Children’s Hospital Boston. Of the 26 fetusesith a prenatal diagnosis of IAA, 21 were liveborn and 5

amilies elected to terminate the pregnancy without fe-opsy. The median gestational age at diagnosis was 25.7eeks (range 17.0 to 37.3) overall and 19.8 weeks (range8.8 to 20.1) for the terminated pregnancies (p �0.001or comparison of terminated pregnancies with those con-inued to birth). Of the 21 liveborn patients, 17 wereemale and 3 were male; for 1 infant, who was born andied at an outside hospital, the gender was unknown.llustrative echocardiographic images are depicted inigures 1 and 2.

All 21 liveborn patients diagnosed prenatally with IAAor whom postnatal echocardiograms were available had aostnatal diagnosis of an IAA or severe coarctation ofhe aorta (COA). Of the 21 liveborn patients, 18 (86%) wereonfirmed to have an IAA after birth (Table 1), and 3 wereound to have severe COA instead of an IAA. In 2 of these 3,he prenatal diagnosis was “either IAA or severe COA,” and in

able 1re- and postnatal diagnosis in each patient

renatal Diagnosis Postnatal Diagnosis Patients (n)

iveborn after prenataldiagnosis of IAA

IAA type B and VSD IAA type B and VSD 4*IAA type B and VSD IAA type A and VSD 1IAA type B and VSD Severe COA with

hypoplastic aorticarch and VSD

1

IAA type A IAA type B and VSD 1IAA unspecified and VSD IAA type B and VSD 4IAA type A or severe

COA and VSDIAA type A and VSD 1

IAA type A or severeCOA and VSD

Severe COA andVSD

1

IAA unspecified or severeCOA, VSD, small leftventricle

COA and Shonecomplex

1

IAA unspecified or severeCOA and VSD

IAA type A and VSD 2†

IAA unspecified or severeCOA and VSD

IAA type B and VSD 5

regnancy terminated afterprenatal diagnosis ofIAA

IAA type B and VSD pregnancy terminated 2IAA unspecified pregnancy terminated 2IAA unspecified or severe

COApregnancy terminated 1

renatal echocardiogramincorrect, postnataldiagnosis of IAA‡

Large VSD, small AoV‡ IAA type A and VSD 1Normal IAA type A and VSD 1Possible COA and mild

ventricular discrepancyIAA type B and VSD 1

* Co-existing left-sided congenital diaphragmatic hernia in 1, diagnosedrenatally and confirmed postnatally.

† Patient also had dextrocardia.‡ Prenatal echocardiography was performed at another institution in the

rst of these patients and at our institution in the other 2.

he third, the prenatal diagnosis was IAA type B. In 2 cases, g

he prenatal diagnosis specified a particular type of IAA (eg,ype A or B), and the postnatal imaging revealed the IAA toe a different type. In 4 cases, the type of IAA was notpecified prenatally and was found to IAA type B postna-ally. In 8 other cases, the prenatal diagnosis was listed aseither IAA or severe COA” and was found postnatally toe IAA type B (n � 5) or type A (n � 3). Those patientsere considered to have had the correct antenatal diagnosis.

n the other 4 cases, the prenatal diagnosis of IAA type Bas correct.In all 21 liveborn patients, a VSD was diagnosed prena-

ally. In 16 cases, all correctly characterized on the prenatalcan, the VSD was a posterior malalignment defect. Ofhese 16 patients, 14 had type B IAA confirmed postnatally,

had type A IAA, and 1 had COA. Of the other 5 patients,had muscular VSDs and 1 a membranous defect. None of

hese patients had a type B IAA; 3 had type A IAA and 2ad COA. All 5 fetuses in which the pregnancy was termi-ated were diagnosed with a posterior malalignment VSD.

Of the 56 patients diagnosed with an IAA in the newborneriod (27 males and 29 females), 53 had not undergonerenatal echocardiography and 3 had a prenatal echocardio-

able 2atients with a family history of cardiac or noncardiac malformation orhromosomal anomaly

amily History Patient Diagnosis Prenatal or NeonatalDiagnosis of IAA

ather with 22q11deletion

IAA type B, 22q11deletion

Prenatal

ather with tetralogyof Fallot andprobably 22q11deletion

IAA type B, 22q11deletion

Prenatal

other and maternalaunt withtetralogy of Fallotand 22q11deletion

IAA type B, 22q11deletion

Prenatal

revious sibling withIAA type A,deceased

IAA type unknown Prenatal (terminated)

revious fetus withIAA typeunknown,pregnancyterminated

IAA type A Neonatal

other and brotherwith 22q11deletion

IAA type B, 22q11deletion

Neonatal

revious fetus withanencephaly

IAA type B, 22q11deletion

Neonatal

ibling with HLHS IAA type B, 22q11deletion

Neonatal

other with 22q11deletion

IAA type B, 22q11deletion

Neonatal

aternalgrandmother withCOA

IAA type A Neonatal*

* Prenatal scan at 20 weeks’ gestation was interpreted as showingormal cardiac anatomy.HLHS � hypoplastic left heart syndrome.

ram that did not include the correct diagnosis. Of these 3

Page 5: Fetal Diagnosis of Interrupted Aortic Arch_Vogel2010

piVpit“I

aappfitatptww

ca

1aosrIT24fnOwVsgcap

ct(

TasnrlvZenawa(ppt

festl

tm4puwi

D

a

TF

V

GA

P

A

A

A

M

A

M

T

M

L

L

R

L

(

pn

731Congenital Heart Disease/Interrupted Aortic Arch in the Fetus

atients, 1 had a fetal echocardiogram from a differentnstitution and was diagnosed with a small AoV and a largeSD but was found to have type A IAA and a VSD onostnatal scanning. The other 2 fetuses were scanned at ournstitution: 1 was reported to have normal findings but hadype A IAA; the other was diagnosed prenatally with apossible COA” and a VSD and was found to have type BAA and a VSD postnatally.

The frequency of the prenatal diagnosis over time wasssessed by dividing the 21-year study period into 3 equiv-lent periods. Of the liveborn patients with a confirmedostnatal diagnosis of IAA (n � 74), 24% were diagnosedrenatally. This frequency increased from 11% during therst 7-year period to 16% during the second and 43% during

he third (p � 0.01). In 2 (40%) of 5 fetuses diagnosed withn IAA during the first 7-year period, the pregnancy waserminated compared to 1 (17%) of 6 during the seconderiod and 2 (13%) of 15 during the most recent period. Ofhe 56 patients first diagnosed during the neonatal period, 24ere diagnosed during the first 7-year period and 16 eachere diagnosed in the second and third periods.Of the 18 prenatally diagnosed patients with postnatally

onfirmed IAA, 12 (67%) had an identified chromosomal

able 3etal echocardiographic data

ariable Total (n � 26) p Value*

estational age at diagnosis (weeks) 25.7 (17.0, 37.3) NAoV diameter Z-score �2.4 � 1.2 �0.001

�2.8 (�5.1, 0.2)ulmonary valve diameter Z-score 1.4 � 1.3 �0.001

1.4 (�1.6, 4.8)oV/pulmonary valve diameter ratio 0.54 � 0.11 �0.001

0.5 (0.35, 0.80)oV/pulmonary valve diameter ratioZ-score

�2.7 � 0.9 �0.001�2.9 (�4.1, �0.3)

scending aorta diameter Z-score �2.5 � 1.0 �0.001�2.5 (�4.6, �0.2)

ain pulmonary artery Z-score 1.4 � 1.2 �0.0011.2 (�0.3, 4.5)

scending aorta/main pulmonaryartery diameter ratio

0.51 � 0.09 NA0.52 (0.33, 0.70)

itral valve Z-score �1.2 � 1.3 �0.0011.3 (�3.8, 1.3)

ricuspid valve Z-score �0.2 � 0.8 0.31�0.2 (�1.7, 1.3)

itral/tricuspid valve diameter ratio 0.85 � 0.14 NA0.87 (0. 61, 1.27)

V long-axis dimension Z-score 0.3 � 0.9 0.130.5 (�1.7, 1.7)

V short-axis dimension Z-score 0.01 � 1.1 0.970.1 (�2.3, 1.5)

ight ventricular long-axisdimension Z-score

0.7 � 0.9 0.0010.5 (�1.2, 1.9)

V/right ventricular length ratio 1.04 � 0.07 NA1.03 (0.86, 1.22)

Data are presented as mean � SD and/or median (range) or as number%) of fetuses in respective column.

* p Values reflect comparison of entire 26-patient cohort with normalopulation (mean Z-score � 0) using 1-sample t test; comparisons withormal data were only performed for variables with Z-scores.

bnormality or syndrome, chromosome 22q11 deletion in 2

0 patients, Turner syndrome in 1, and VACTERL associ-tion (vertebral anomalies; anal atresia; cardiac defect, mostften VSD; tracheoesophageal fistula with esophageal atre-ia; renal abnormalities; and limb abnormalities, most oftenadial dysplasia) in 1. One of the patients diagnosed withAA in utero who was found to have COA after birth hadurner syndrome. The genetic status was unknown in 1 of1 liveborn patients with a prenatal diagnosis of IAA and inof the 5 in which the pregnancy was terminated. A mal-

ormation syndrome or chromosome abnormality was diag-osed in 30 of 56 patients with a neonatal diagnosis of IAA.f the 30 patients, 27 had a chromosome 22q11 deletion (1ith Klippel-Feil syndrome in addition and 1 withACTERL association), and 1 patient each had CHARGE

yndrome, trisomy 21, and chromosome 4 deletion. Theenetic status was unknown in 9 of 56 patients with aonfirmed neonatal diagnosis of IAA. The chromosomalbnormalities were similarly common in patients diagnosedre- and postnatally.

A known family history of cardiac, severe noncardiac, orhromosomal/genetic abnormalities was reported in 10 pa-ients, including 4 (15%) of those with a prenatal diagnosisTable 2).

The fetal echocardiographic data are summarized inable 3. Overall, the Z-scores for the AoV, ascending aorta,nd mitral valve were significantly (p �0.001) lower in thetudy cohort than in normal fetuses, and were less thanormal (Z-score �2) in 69%, 73%, and 19% of fetuses,espectively (Figure 3 and Table 3). The LV short- and LVong-axis Z-scores, however, were normal. The pulmonaryalve, main pulmonary artery, and right ventricular length-scores were all larger than normal, although only mod-stly so for the right ventricle (Table 3). The AoV/pulmo-ary valve diameter ratio (0.54 � 0.11) and the ascendingorta/main pulmonary artery diameter ratio (0.50 � 0.09)ere lower than normal, but both were noticeably greater

nd closer to normal in fetuses diagnosed earlier in gestationFigure 3). The fetuses found to have IAA type A and COAostnatally tended to have greater ascending aorta/mainulmonary artery diameter ratios on the prenatal scan thanhose with IAA type B.

In 10 fetuses, serial prenatal echocardiograms were per-ormed with a median duration between the first and lastchocardiograms of 58.5 days (range 28 to 98). In this smallubset of patients, no significant differences were found inhe Z-scores of the cardiac structures between the first andast studies.

Of the 21 liveborn patients diagnosed with IAA prena-ally, including those found to have a COA postnatally, theedian gestational age at birth was 39 weeks (range 35 to

1) and the median birth weight was 2.83 kg. Of those 21atients, 5 (24%) died in infancy. Nineteen patients (91%)nderwent cardiac surgery for IAA and 2 patients diedithout surgery. Of the 56 patients diagnosed with an IAA

n the newborn period, 3 (5%) died in infancy.

iscussion

As with other conotruncal anomalies, the prenatal di-gnosis of IAA is relatively uncommon. During the past

1 years at our center, 24% of patients born with an IAA
Page 6: Fetal Diagnosis of Interrupted Aortic Arch_Vogel2010

wcn4co�ycsdo2dTapoci

of

pmnrwadaIpApaccb

Famdn

732 The American Journal of Cardiology (www.AJConline.org)

ere diagnosed in utero.8,11,12 However, during theourse of the study, the frequency of the prenatal diag-osis increased from 11% in the first 7-year period to3% in most recent 7-year period. Despite a high asso-iation of chromosomal anomalies and that the outcomesf IAA remain suboptimal,13 the rate of termination was25% overall and decreased from 40% during the first 7

ears to 15% in the subsequent 14 years. Fourteen per-ent of infants born with the diagnosis of an IAA in thiseries had a positive family history of cardiac, noncar-iac, or chromosomal anomalies. As described in previ-us studies, type B IAA is commonly associated with the2q11 deletion; however, fetuses with CHARGE syn-rome, VACTERL association, Klippel-Feil syndrome,urner syndrome, and other syndromes/anomalies couldlso have an IAA.6,7,14,15 The increasing frequency of therenatal diagnosis over time, consistent with trends forther complex anomalies, is likely to be related to aombination of factors, including improving image qual-

igure 3. Scatterplots showing distribution of (A) AoV diameters accordinorta/main pulmonary artery diameter ratio according to gestational age. Inean (Z-score � 0) and the narrow lines indicating the limits of normal (

iagnosis: IAA type B (solid circles), IAA type A (open circles), and COAot confirmed) indicated by solid triangles.

ty, increased awareness of the cardiac defect, experience a

f the primary sonographer, and more frequent referralor echocardiography for various indications.

The most prominent anatomic hallmarks of IAA in theresent series were a small AoV with a normal-size LV,ildly enlarged right-sided structures, small AoV/pulmo-

ary valve, and ascending aorta/pulmonary artery diameteratios (Figure 1), and the universal presence of a VSD,hich was always correctly identified as a posterior mal-

lignment defect in cases of IAA type B. A significant sizeiscrepancy between the AoV and pulmonary valve or aortand main pulmonary artery might not be pathognomonic ofAA, but it should alert the ultrasonographer to the possibleresence of an aortic arch anomaly such as COA or IAA.lthough the numbers of patients with IAA type A or COAostnatally were small, a tendency for greater ascendingorta/main pulmonary artery diameter ratios in these fetusesompared to those with IAA type B. This observation isonsistent with the larger volume of blood flow that woulde expected to pass through the ascending aorta in these

tational age; (B) AoV/pulmonary valve diameter ratio; and (C) ascending(B), the normal range is depicted with the broad line indicating the normal

s �2 and �2). In (C), data from individual fetuses indicated by postnatalsquares). Fetal data from terminated pregnancies (ie, postnatal diagnosis

g to ges(A) andZ-score

(open

nomalies, in which all the brachiocephalic vessels are sup-

Page 7: Fetal Diagnosis of Interrupted Aortic Arch_Vogel2010

pBiovdattmwdd

mimtb3ihsotaima

tdiavaios2mt

vnbemfliLcganotVao

edsapisncpfiadmagofmsif

1

1

1

1

1

733Congenital Heart Disease/Interrupted Aortic Arch in the Fetus

lied by flow from the LV and AoV compared to IAA type, in which the ascending aorta supplies flow only to the

nnominate and left common carotid arteries. The presencef a VSD in utero, particularly a moderate to large cono-entricular VSD, should not be assumed to be an isolatedefect (Figure 1). A conoventricular VSD is rarely isolatednd additional significant defects including IAA, transposi-ion of the great arteries, double-outlet right ventricle, andetralogy of Fallot should specifically be sought. A posterioralalignment VSD is often, although not always, associatedith IAA type B. Positive testing for chromosome 22q11eletion should further alert the physician to the possibleiagnosis of IAA type B.

Diagnosing IAA in the fetus can be challenging. Inost cases all 4 chambers are present (Figure 1). Cross-

ng of the outflow tracts is seen, and the fetal scan can beistaken for normal. The difficulty in diagnosing IAA in

he fetus is illustrated by the facts that IAA was missedy fetal echocardiography in 3 cases and “overcalled” infetuses with COA and that in 1/2 of the prenatally

dentified cases, the fetal echocardiography report eitheredged whether the diagnosis was IAA or COA or did notpecify the type of IAA. The difficulty in identifying IAAn prenatal echocardiograms is due in part to the poten-ial for the ductus arteriosus to resemble the aortic archnd for the left subclavian artery arising from the prox-mal descending aorta, just distal to the ductal arch, to beistaken for head and neck vessels arising from the

ortic arch (Figure 2).Other than the aortopulmonary size discrepancy, ana-

omic patterns and relationships can aid in the prenataliagnosis of IAA. For example, a common feature of IAAs that the ascending aorta travels straight up craniallynd does not begin to curve at the first brachiocephalicessel (Figure 2). The ultrasonographer might notice a Yppearance (Figure 2), with the ascending aorta branch-ng into the first 2 brachiocephalic branches (innominater right common carotid and left common carotid). Inome cases, particularly fetuses with a chromosome2q11 deletion, arch imaging can be further compro-ised by the lack of a thymus gland, which often con-

rasts with the arch.A size discrepancy between the left ventricle and right

entricle on prenatal echocardiogram is a commonly recog-ized feature of LV outflow tract or arch obstruction16–18

ut was absent in fetuses with IAA. This important differ-nce is almost certainly owing to the presence of a VSD inost patients with IAA. In the presence of a VSD, the netow through the left ventricle is unimpeded, thereby allow-

ng normal LV loading and growth. In contrast, when theV outflow tract or aortic arch obstruction occurs in asso-iation with an intact ventricular septum, LV loading androwth are more likely to be affected, and LV size to bebnormal (either dilated or small). Accordingly, the combi-ation of a low aortopulmonary diameter ratio and absencef a ventricular size discrepancy should be considered a clueo the presence of arch obstruction in combination with aSD. Slodki et al19 recently showed that mediastinal great

rterial diameter ratios might also be useful in the diagnosis

f fetal COA.

This was a retrospective study that included patientsvaluated during a 21-year period in which the prenataletection rates and ultrasound technology changed con-iderably. The intra- and interobserver variability fornatomic measurements was not performed for theresent study, and it has been shown that importantntraobserver variability might exist in fetal 2-dimen-ional and Doppler measurements.20 Genetic testing wasot performed in all patients; thus, the frequency ofhromosomal and other syndromes may not be com-letely accurate. The anatomic diagnoses were not con-rmed in the terminated pregnancies; thus, diagnosticccuracy could not be assessed in �20% of prenatallyiagnosed cases of IAA. The apparently greater earlyortality in the prenatal diagnosis group might reflect

scertainment bias if the newborns with IAA in oureographic catchment died before or without transfer tour center. For the same reason, our estimates of therequency of prenatal diagnosis might have overesti-ated. Although some of our patients were found to have

evere COA after birth, our study was not intended tonvestigate the differentiation of IAA from COA in theetus.

1. Hoffman JI, Kaplan S. The incidence of congenital heart disease. J AmColl Cardiol 2002;39:1890–1900.

2. Boudjemline Y, Fermont L, Le Bidois J, Fraisse A, Kachaner J, VillainE, Sidi D, Bonnet D. Prenatal diagnosis of conotruncal heart diseases:results in 337 cases. Arch Mal Coeur Vaiss 2000;93:583–586.

3. Firpo C, Hoffman JIE, Silverman NH. Evaluation of fetal heart di-mensions from 12 weeks to term. Am J Cardiol 2001;87:594–600.

4. Carvalho JS, Mavrides E, Shinebourne EA, Campbell S, Thilaga-nathan B. Improving the effectiveness of routine prenatal screening formajor congenital heart defects. Heart 2002;88:387–391.

5. Molina FS, Nicolaides KH, Carvalho JS. Two- and three-dimensionalimaging of coarctation shelf in the human fetus. Heart 2008;94:584.

6. Oosterhof T, Azakie A, Freedom RM, Williams WG, McCrindle BW.Associated factors and trends in outcomes of interrupted aortic arch.Ann Thorac Surg 2004;78:1696–1702.

7. Law KM, Tse KT. Prenatal sonographic diagnosis of familial Holt-Oram syndrome associated with type B interrupted aortic arch. HongKong Med J 2008;14:317–320.

8. Boudjemline Y, Fermont L, Le Bidois J, Lyonnet S, Sidi D, Bonnet D.Prevalence of 22q11 deletion in fetuses with conotruncal cardiacdefects: a 6-year prospective study. J Pediatr 2001;138:520–524.

9. McGahan JP, Moon-Grady AJ, Pahwa A, Towner D, Rhee-Morris L,Gerscovich EO, Fogata M. Potential pitfalls and methods of improvingin utero diagnosis of transposition of the great arteries, including thebaby bird’s beak image. J Ultrasound Med 2007;26:1499–1510.

0. Yasukochi S, Satomi G. Fetal diagnosis of common arterial trunk withinterrupted aortic arch using color power Doppler angiography. Car-diol Young 2000;10:54–56.

1. Kumar PK, Newburger JW, Gauvreau K, Kamenir SA, HornbergerLK. Comparison of outcome when hypoplastic left heart syndrome andtransposition of the great arteries are diagnosed prenatally versus whendiagnosis of these two conditions is made postnatally. Am J Cardiol1999;83:1649–1653.

2. Bonnet D, Coltri A, Butera G, Fermont L, Le Bidois J, Kachaner J,Sidi D. Detection of transposition of the great arteries in fetusesreduces neonatal morbidity and mortality. Circulation 1999;99:916–918.

3. McCrindle BW, Tchervenkov CI, Konstantinow IE, Williams WG,Neirotti RA, Jacobs ML, Blackstone EH; Congenital Heart SurgeonsSociety. Risk factors associated with mortality and interventions in472 neonates with interrupted aortic arch: a Congenital Heart SurgeonsSociety study. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2005;129:343–350.

4. Ziolkowska L, Kawalec W, Turska-Kmiec A, Krajewska-Walasek

M, Brzezinska-Rajszys G, Daszkowska J, Maruszewski B, Burc-zynski P. Chromosome 22q11.2 microdeletion in children with
Page 8: Fetal Diagnosis of Interrupted Aortic Arch_Vogel2010

1

1

1

1

1

2

734 The American Journal of Cardiology (www.AJConline.org)

conotruncal heart defects: frequency, associated cardiovascularanomalies, and outcome following cardiac surgery. Eur J Pediatr2008;167:1135–1140.

5. Goldmuntz E, Clark BJ, Mitchell LE, Jawad AF, Cuneo BF, Reed L,McDonald-McGinn D, Chien P, Feuer J, Zackai EH, Emanuel BS,Driscoll DA. Frequency of 22q11 deletions in patients with conotrun-cal defects. J Am Coll Cardiol 1998;32:492–498.

6. Brown DL, Durfee SM, Hornberger LK. Ventricular discrepancy as asonographic sign of coarctation of the fetal aorta: how reliable is it? JUltrasound Med 1997;16:95–99.

7. Hornberger LK, Sanders SP, Rein AJ, Spevak PJ, Parness IA, Colan SD.Left heart obstructive lesions and left ventricular growth in the midtri-

mester fetus: a longitudinal study. Circulation 1995;92:1531–1538.

8. Mäkikallio K, McElhinney DB, Levine JC, Marx GR, Colan SD,Marshall AC, Lock JE, Marcus EN, Tworetzky W. Fetal aorticvalve stenosis and the evolution of hypoplastic left heart syndrome:patient selection for fetal intervention. Circulation 2006;113:1401–1405.

9. Slodki M, Rychik J, Moszura T, Janiak K, Respondek-Liberska M.Measurement of the great vessels in the mediastinum could helpdistinguish true from false-positive coarctation of the aorta in the thirdtrimester. J Ultrasound Med 2009;28:1313–1317.

0. Awadh AM, Prefumo F, Bland JM, Carvalho JS. Assessment of theintraobserver variability in the measurement of fetal cardiothoracicratio using ellipse and diameter methods. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol

2006;28:53–56.

Recommended