+ All Categories
Home > Documents > Fidelity and Deposit Co of Maryland Against Jacob Frydman

Fidelity and Deposit Co of Maryland Against Jacob Frydman

Date post: 11-Dec-2015
Category:
Upload: jay
View: 6 times
Download: 4 times
Share this document with a friend
Description:
Judgment vs. company of Jacob Frydman the CEO of United Realty a Public non-traded REIT based in New York, NY House called Ledgerock Hyde Park, 917-576-8000
Popular Tags:
2
sA.~. m-."a ,1 a ' '' ' , 4,' r rs ••;- :- ••"• ... -'1% ' SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK FIDELITY AND DEPOSIT COMPANY OF MARYLAND, - against - JACOB A. FRYDMAN, Plaintiff, Defendant.. ^^ V 4^f ^ i* i* *• <^:2 Ji Index No.: 115113/95 IAS Part 5 Justice Bransten JUDGMENT Plaintiff, Fidelity and Deposit Company of Maryland, having moved this Court for an order directing the Clerk of the CoVirt to enter judgment pursuant to CPLR §3212 in favor of Fidelity and Deposit Company of Matylaiid and against defendant Jacob A. Frydman in the sum of $105,399.13 together with interest as taxed by the Clerk, and costs and disbursements, on the ground that plaintiff's causes of action have been sufficiently established to warrant the Court, as a matter of law, to direct judgment in favor of Fidelity and Deposit Company of Maryland, and, in addition, pursuant to plaintiff's second cause of action, to sever and continue this second cause of action for the recovery of attorney's fees, and the Court having entered a decision/order/judgment on September 13, 1996, directing the entry of judgment, HOW, on motion of Mait, Wang S Simmons, attorneys •plaintiff, it is HWUiBHO, that plaintiif, xxid Deposit Co '4:«- 5S&
Transcript
Page 1: Fidelity and Deposit Co of Maryland Against Jacob Frydman

sA.~. m-."a ,1 a

' '' ' , 4,' r rs ••;- :-• • " • ... -'1% '

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

FIDELITY AND DEPOSIT COMPANYOF MARYLAND,

- against -

JACOB A. FRYDMAN,

Plaintiff,

Defendant..

^^ V 4^f ^ i* i* *•<^:2 Ji

Index No.:

115113/95IAS Part 5

Justice Bransten

JUDGMENT

Plaintiff, Fidelity and Deposit Company of Maryland,

having moved this Court for an order directing the Clerk of the

CoVirt to enter judgment pursuant to CPLR §3212 in favor of Fidelity

and Deposit Company of Matylaiid and against defendant Jacob A.

Frydman in the sum of $105,399.13 together with interest as taxed

by the Clerk, and costs and disbursements, on the ground that

plaintiff's causes of action have been sufficiently established to

warrant the Court, as a matter of law, to direct judgment in favor

of Fidelity and Deposit Company of Maryland, and, in addition,

pursuant to plaintiff's second cause of action, to sever and

continue this second cause of action for the recovery of attorney's

fees, and the Court having entered a decision/order/judgment on

September 13, 1996, directing the entry of judgment,

HOW, on motion of Mait, Wang S Simmons, attorneys

•plaintiff, it is

HWUiBHO, that plaintiif, xxid Deposit Co'4:«-

5S&

Page 2: Fidelity and Deposit Co of Maryland Against Jacob Frydman

New York do recover of defendant, Jacob A. Frydman, residing at 950

Third Avenue, New York, New York the principal sum of $205,399.13

with interest thereon from May 10, 1995 as ordered by the Court,

such interest amounting to the sum of $12,839.06 as calculated by

the Clerk, together with costs and disbursements in the amount ofJf VfS, OOytfT Tf. as taxed by the Clerk, for a total judgment of

that plaintiff have execution therefor.

Judgment entered the 16th day of September, 1996.

Clerk 6;f the Court

" jw.'ei t

i.-V


Recommended