FIDES
1
FIDES
FIDES : general presentation
FIDES
2
Content
êWhy FIDESêContextêMethodology
l Basic modelsl Technology contributionl Use contributionl Process factor
ê FIDES engineeringêConclusions
FIDES
3
Why FIDES
ê Existing predictive reliability methods are inadequatel MIL-HDBK-217 is widely obsolete
l Not updated since 1991 / 1995,l Not adapted for civil application and pessimistic for civil
components,…l IEC 62380 TR Ed.1 (RDF 2003) or PRISM® / 217+® don’t propose
complete answersl Not adapted for complex mission profile,l Not adapted for rugged environment (humidity, vibration,…,),l Unable to sort by COTS manufacturers,l …
military equipmentMIL HDBK
217F (Pi Q=10)
MIL HDBK217F
with correctionPRISM
(217plus) Field return
MTBF (in hours) 3063 19036 59673 169895
FIDES
4
Component20%
Process80%
Context
Specification 8%
Design 16%
Manufacturing 24% System
Integration 12%
Exploitation & Maintenance
20%
Support Activities
20%
Fides default failure distributionthrough life cycle
(example)
Weighting between component & process
(example)
Intrinsic failures (FE, BE, …) are not the main causes of equipment failures
FIDES
5
Context : new approach for reliability prediction FIDES
METHODOLOGYMETHODOLOGY
for reliabilityfor reliabilityASSESSMENTASSESSMENT
for reliabilityfor reliabilityENGINEERINGENGINEERING
FIDES
• Results of a study which has begun in 2001 on the aegis of the French MOD
•Developed by 8 industrialists from the field of aeronautics and defense
FIDES
6
What is FIDES
êWhat is FIDES ?l FIDES is a new reliability methodology for electronic
systems using COTS,l The first FIDES Guide 2004 issue A “Reliability
Methodology for Electronic Systems” was published in 2004, new edition FIDES 2009, standard UTE C-80811 since 2005 (in english & french),
l This Guide is an answer to two strong needs :l To have realistic reliability prediction during the development
of an electronic productl To provide engineering process and tools to assess
equipment system reliability
FIDES
7
FIDES for what
ê FIDES proposes a new reliability methodology for systems using COTSl As accurate as possible,l Useful for building and evaluating the reliability of
systems,l Usable for many items , including COTS families,
Parts Boards Sub-assemblies
FIDES
8
What is FIDES
ê The FIDES methodologyl Include new technologies,
l Take into account all the influences on reliability like :l Technologies,l Application (naval, airborne, avionics, automotive,…),l Life cycle (specification, design, manufacture, system
integration, maintenance),l Actual use conditions (thermal, mechanical, electrical,…),l Overstresses.
FIDES
9
What is FIDES
Technologies
Process Use
Reliability
FIDES
10
The methodology
TECHNOLOGY
PROCESS
RELIABILITY
USE
FIDES
11
FIDES Methodology : Models
ê FIDES models: partsl Integrated circuits, ASIC, Discrete parts, LED, Opto, Resistors, Fuses, Ceramic
capacitors, Aluminum capacitors, Tantalum capacitors, Magnetic parts (inductors & transformers), Piezoelectric parts (oscillators & quartz), Hermetically Sealed Electromechanical Relays, Switches, PCB, Connectors, Hybrids & MCM, Hyper frequency parts
ê FIDES models: cardl COTS cards
ê FIDES models: sub-assemblyl LCD screens, Hard disks, CRT monitors, AC/DC & DC/DC converters,
Li & Ni Energy storage modules, Fans, Pressure sensors, Keyboards
ê FIDES models : part count
NB : XXX : news models in FIDES 2009 guide
FIDES
12
FIDES Generic Models
ê Generic Model
( ) ProcessPart_MfgInducedtressPhysical_Sitem .ππ.πλλ .∑=
Specific modelisation : EOS, TOS, MOS.
Specific modelisation for quality
management of COTS manufacturing
Reliability engineering
Physical contribution to the reliability
Process audit (Design, manufacturing and use of the product
FIDES
13
πππλλ InducedocessingmanufacturPartPhysical ⋅⋅⋅= Pr_
The methodology: basic model
Where,
λ : total failure rate (in fit, 1 failure per 109 hours)λPhysical : Physical contribution : tables + used constraintsπPart_manufacturing : Part production quality/reliability levelπProcess : Quality and technical control of the development, manufacturing
and maintenance process for products containing COTS
πInduced : Induced factors (overstress) i.e. effects of accidental damage according to type of application, COTS sensitivity factor, location and robustness control => questionnaire
FIDES
14
The methodology:Technology
TECHNOLOGY
PROCESS
RELIABILITY
USE
FIDES
15
( )
Π⋅= ∑
onscontributiPhysicalonacceleratiPhysical
_0λλ
Basic failure rate for each part type e.g. resistors, capacitors, inductors, switches, optoelectronics, I.C. and discrete semiconductors (die & package) => table
Acceleration factor (sensitivity to rated physical contributors e.g. electrical, thermal cycling, humidity, mechanical and chemical constraints) => mission profile
0λ
onacceleratiΠ
2- The methodology: physical contributors
FIDES
16
2- The methodology: USE
TECHNOLOGY
PROCESS
RELIABILITY
USE
FIDES
17
Life Profile: General description
ê We have to identify:
l Precise type of platform integrating the productl The location of the product in the platforml Geographical area or climatic consideredl Type of use (condition of use)
ê For example, the same product used in two different geographical areas can constitute two different types of use
FIDES
18
Life Profile: General description
ê How to build the Life Profile ?l Use case identification l Identification of the factors of variability in each use casel Establishment of the life profile for each use casel Relative weighting of each use casel Profiles gathering of each use case to reach a single profile
ê It is better to use several life profilesê A typical life profile must be a profile of system level
FIDES
19
Life Profile: Phases Choice
ê Phases choice must describe as completely as possible the various operating situations
ê To distinguish a specific phase each time the environmental conditions significantly change at the level of the encountered constraints
ê The identification of the operating situations must be firstly performed at the system level and then at equipment level
FIDES
20
Life Profile: Phase’s Duration
ê Recommendations : the life profiles are built over a 1 year duration : 8760 hoursl 24 hours per daysl 730 hours per month (average)l 8760 hours per year
ê “Calendar hours” is used
ê The duration must be selected in order to be realistic
ê The phase’s duration of each are expressed in hours
ê Objective: To produce failure rates expressed in FIT (1 FIT accounts for 1 failure by 10 -9 hours)
FIDES
21
ê FIDES treats the accidental overstress not listed like such
Examples :
l A road roller rolls on the equipment : if there is overstress, it (in theory) will be identified ð Not treated by FIDES
l The equipment is disconnected when switched-on: there is risk of overstress (if the equipment is not planned for) and this overstress is not listedð Treated by FIDES
2-The methodology: induced factor (Πinduced)
FIDES
22
2-The methodology: induced factor (Πinduced)
êWhat is an accidental overstress?l An accidental overstress is an event which is out a
normal usage of the system (EOS, MOS, TOS ).
êCriteria to appreciate the severity in term of exposure to overstress :
l Sensitivity of the COTS (technology, …)l Policy of overstress integration in product developmentl operating environment of the application (example MOS are
more important in mobile than fixed application)l Position of the item in the equipment or system
FIDES
23
ê Induced factor (Πinduit) includes four under-factors:
l Placement in the application (in particular: interface or not)
l The type of application, which defines the exposure to the overstress
l Efforts of hardening made under development (construction of the robustness)
l The technology sensitivity to the overstress
FIDES Contributors : Induced Factor
FIDES
24
ê The induced factor of FIDES considers overstress :l Electrical (E.O.S)
l Mechanical (M.O.S)
l Thermal (T.O.S)
ê It must be evaluated for each life profile phase
ê It can vary from 1 (the best) to 100 (the worst) : In reality à from 1 to 10
FIDES Contributors : Induced Factor
FIDES
25
FIDES Contributors : Induced Factor
FIDES
26
FIDES Contributors : Induced Factor
FIDES
27
The methodology: process factor
TECHNOLOGY
PROCESS
RELIABILITY
USE
FIDES
28
The methodology: process factor
êProcess factor Π ProcesslReliability process management (audit)
êΠ ProcesslIs representative of the quality and technical control of the reliability in the product life cycle (from specification to maintenance),lCan be assessed through an audit of the reliability process during the whole lifecycle of an equipment or system.
FIDES
29
The methodology: process factor
ê Building reliability:l 200 recommendations related to activities for the whole life cycle,
• Specification,• Design, • Manufacturing, • System Integration, • Maintenance, • Support activities (Quality and Human Resources)
ê This engineering allows:l Calculation of process factor : π process to assess global reliability,l Identification of life cycle activities where reliability needs improvement.
FIDES
30
FIDES Engineering
TECHNOLOGY
PROCESS
RELIABILITY
USE
FIDES
31
Reliability Engineering
ê FIDES makes it possible “to quantify” :l Impact of Life Profile on equipment reliability:
è Life Profile
l Reliabilty impact of a component policy:è Pi_Part_Manufacturing factor
l Impact of a strategy at implementation processes level (development, manufacture, and use) of the components in the equipment:è Pi_Process factor
l Impact of accidental overstress: è Pi_Induced factor
FIDES
32
Reliability Engineering
ê AND, FIDES gives :
l Technological guidelines in term of design
è Example : evaluation of the impact penalizing of certain technological families on the reliability of complete equipment
l A realistic value (with narrow margin) of the equipment reliability
è That allows to justify the obtaining an estimated reliability claimed in the requirements
FIDES
33
Reliability Engineering
ê FIDES reliability engineering :l «FIDES must cover the whole of the industrialists' needs concerning the
reliability»
l FIDES Guide :l 1 guide of Reliability Assessmentl 1 guide of Audit and Reliability Engineering
l Taking into account of all the factors which influence reliabilityl A changing methodology: new technologies, new modelisationsl Provides the tools and criteria allowing to assess the level of control of
reliability of an equipment supplier and thus his credibility
FIDES = EVALUATE + BUILD upstream
RELIABILITY CONTROL
FIDES
34
Conclusions
TECHNOLOGY
PROCESS
RELIABILITY
USE
FIDES
35
Support of FIDES
ê FIDES is distributed for free (except UTE version of the document)ê This structure takes place in a well known and recognized for
many years French association dedicated to reliability and safety: the IMDR (www.imdr.eu)
ê This structure is operational with 3 Working Groups :l FIDES evolutionsl FIDES international promotionl Guides of best practice and application to other domains
ê More than 30 companies registeredê Only French members for the moment, but the whole group agree
to become international
FIDES
36
FIDES web site
l The address of the FIDES web site will be :
« fides-reliability.org »
l This web site will provide in English :l Access to guides and tools,l Information on developments, methods, … l Events, links, news, important experiences,l A forum allowing all the users to discuss and exchange data,l A protected access area to allow working groups to exchange data, l A direct contact to the consortium FIDES for any question,l ………………and all you could suggest,
FIDES
37
FIDES tools
ê Today available toolsl The FIDES Group has developed tools for an easy
application of the methodology
l These tools can be downloaded directly at http://www.fides-reliability.org
l Module FIDES2009 are available in commercial software :l RELEXl RAM COMMANDERl FIABILITYl CARE
FIDES
38
Positions of French contractors
l French MOD (DGA)l The FIDES Guide was integrated in the RNPA (Programs of
Armament Standard Referential). It is quoted as a reference method in multiple new projects of armament.
l French spatial Agency (CNES)l This Agency realized a detailed evaluation of FIDES
methodology. This evaluation concluded that FIDES can be used for space applications (see publications in " Actualités composants du CNES " n°17 in October, 2004 and n°18 in January, 2005).
l EDF groupl EDF R&D realized an evaluation of the method, and has
regular contacts with FIDES Group.
FIDES
39
Positions of French contractors
l AIRBUS l AIRBUS asks for a predictive reliability evaluation without
requiring a method. FIDES is referenced and can be recommended.
l Automotivel FIDES group worked in partnership with the French Bureau of
Automotive Standardization (BNA) and contacts with SIA
FIDES
40
êFIDES provides
l A method for reliability assessmentl A method for reliability engineering
êFIDES aims to cover all the industrial needs in matter of reliability prediction
êFIDES has potential for evolution
l Integration of new technology without field experiencel Easy update of models
Conclusion
FIDES
41
Conclusion
l Takes into accountoverstress, mission profile(even for dormantapplications), parts quality
l FIDES is able to improvereliability by contributorsanalysis, and πprocess auditcheck list
l Excellent models coverage:Asics, switch, hybrids, HF/RFcomponents, …
l A maintenance structure iscreated to updatemethodology
l Usable for all applicationfields whose space one’s
êMajor experimentation conclusions
FIDES
42
Conclusions
Why to use FIDES ?
ê FIDES deals with recent technologies and components
ê FIDES life profile can be adapted to all our applications
ê FIDES allows to do reliability engineering
ê FIDES is living, not frozen, open to improvement andsupported by an independent structure and benefit fromthe experience of several companies
FIDES
43
FIDES
Thank you for your attention