+ All Categories
Home > Documents > Fig 5.1 (probably better) Fig 4 p14882 Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA Vol. 93, pp. 14878–14883,...

Fig 5.1 (probably better) Fig 4 p14882 Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA Vol. 93, pp. 14878–14883,...

Date post: 13-Jan-2016
Category:
Upload: mabel-alexander
View: 213 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend
Popular Tags:
42
Fig 5.1 (probably better) Fig 4 p14882 Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA Vol. 93, pp. 14878– 14883, December 1996 Neurobiology Detection of cortical activation during averaged single trials of a cognitive task using functional magnetic resonance imaging (neuroimagingysingle trialylanguageyprefron tal) RANDY L. BUCKNER†‡§¶, PETER A. BANDETTINI†‡, KATHLEEN M. O’CRAVEN†i, ROBERT L. SAVOY†i, STEVEN E. PETERSEN**††, MARCUS
Transcript
Page 1: Fig 5.1 (probably better) Fig 4 p14882 Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA Vol. 93, pp. 14878–14883, December 1996 Neurobiology Detection of cortical activation.

Fig 5.1 (probably better)

Fig 4 p14882

Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAVol. 93, pp. 14878–14883, December 1996NeurobiologyDetection of cortical activation during averaged single trials of acognitive task using functional magnetic resonance imaging(neuroimagingysingle trialylanguageyprefrontal)RANDY L. BUCKNER†‡§¶, PETER A. BANDETTINI†‡, KATHLEEN M. O’CRAVEN†i, ROBERT L. SAVOY†i,STEVEN E. PETERSEN**††, MARCUS E. RAICHLE§**††, AND BRUCE R. ROSEN†‡

Page 2: Fig 5.1 (probably better) Fig 4 p14882 Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA Vol. 93, pp. 14878–14883, December 1996 Neurobiology Detection of cortical activation.

Fig 5.2 (alternative)

The problem of functionallocalization in the human brainMatthew Brett, Ingrid S. Johnsrude and Adrian M. OwenNature Reviews Neuroscience,3, 243-249Fig 1 p244

Page 3: Fig 5.1 (probably better) Fig 4 p14882 Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA Vol. 93, pp. 14878–14883, December 1996 Neurobiology Detection of cortical activation.

Fig 5.3

Nature Neuroscience (2008) 10, 1193-1200 fig 3 p 1195

Page 4: Fig 5.1 (probably better) Fig 4 p14882 Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA Vol. 93, pp. 14878–14883, December 1996 Neurobiology Detection of cortical activation.

5.4 Crescentini

Page 5: Fig 5.1 (probably better) Fig 4 p14882 Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA Vol. 93, pp. 14878–14883, December 1996 Neurobiology Detection of cortical activation.

Fig 5.5 ??

• Top only – from wikapaedia

• Unclear which

Page 6: Fig 5.1 (probably better) Fig 4 p14882 Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA Vol. 93, pp. 14878–14883, December 1996 Neurobiology Detection of cortical activation.

Fig 5.5 (easier access)

p702

Page 7: Fig 5.1 (probably better) Fig 4 p14882 Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA Vol. 93, pp. 14878–14883, December 1996 Neurobiology Detection of cortical activation.

Fig 5.6

Fig 3 and fig 4 p 420

Page 8: Fig 5.1 (probably better) Fig 4 p14882 Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA Vol. 93, pp. 14878–14883, December 1996 Neurobiology Detection of cortical activation.

Fig 5.7Remove SPM design matrix

In Friston, K. (2007) Statistical parametric mapping In Friston, K, Ashburner, J., Kiebel, S., Nicholls, T & Penny, W. (Eds.) Statistical Parametric Mapping. London: Academic Press. (pp10-31) Fig 2.6 (p23)

Page 9: Fig 5.1 (probably better) Fig 4 p14882 Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA Vol. 93, pp. 14878–14883, December 1996 Neurobiology Detection of cortical activation.

Fig 5.8

Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 1999, 11, 9-24Graded Functional Activation in theVisuospatial System with the Amount of TaskDemandP. A. Carpenter, M. A. Just, T. A. Keller, and W. EddyCarnegie Mellon UniversityK. ThulbornUniversity of Pittsburgh Medical Center

Fig 6 p15

Page 10: Fig 5.1 (probably better) Fig 4 p14882 Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA Vol. 93, pp. 14878–14883, December 1996 Neurobiology Detection of cortical activation.

Fig 5.9

Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 1999, 11, 9-24Graded Functional Activation in theVisuospatial System with the Amount of TaskDemandP. A. Carpenter, M. A. Just, T. A. Keller, and W. EddyCarnegie Mellon UniversityK. ThulbornUniversity of Pittsburgh Medical Center

Fig 7 p17

Page 11: Fig 5.1 (probably better) Fig 4 p14882 Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA Vol. 93, pp. 14878–14883, December 1996 Neurobiology Detection of cortical activation.

Resources

Page 12: Fig 5.1 (probably better) Fig 4 p14882 Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA Vol. 93, pp. 14878–14883, December 1996 Neurobiology Detection of cortical activation.

fig 5.11

• Do you get the effect – you need to fixate the centre– it is clear in a high resolution image; maybe the bottom fig should be removed

Fig 1 (p216)

S ZEKI, JDG WATSON, RSJ FRACKOWIAK Proceedings- Royal Society of London.Biological sciences 252:13351335, 215-222, Royal Society of London, 1993.

Page 13: Fig 5.1 (probably better) Fig 4 p14882 Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA Vol. 93, pp. 14878–14883, December 1996 Neurobiology Detection of cortical activation.

5.12

• Decomposition of Petersen

Page 14: Fig 5.1 (probably better) Fig 4 p14882 Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA Vol. 93, pp. 14878–14883, December 1996 Neurobiology Detection of cortical activation.

Fig 5.13

Fig 1 (p196) and Fig 2 (p199)

ab

May be best to redraw

Page 15: Fig 5.1 (probably better) Fig 4 p14882 Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA Vol. 93, pp. 14878–14883, December 1996 Neurobiology Detection of cortical activation.

Fig 5.14 – need to check chapter 10

Fig 3 p201

Page 16: Fig 5.1 (probably better) Fig 4 p14882 Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA Vol. 93, pp. 14878–14883, December 1996 Neurobiology Detection of cortical activation.

Fig 5.15

In the text a = c; b = dFig 5 p209

Page 17: Fig 5.1 (probably better) Fig 4 p14882 Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA Vol. 93, pp. 14878–14883, December 1996 Neurobiology Detection of cortical activation.

• 5.16 – Anderson Rick

Page 18: Fig 5.1 (probably better) Fig 4 p14882 Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA Vol. 93, pp. 14878–14883, December 1996 Neurobiology Detection of cortical activation.

Fig 5.17

p335

Page 19: Fig 5.1 (probably better) Fig 4 p14882 Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA Vol. 93, pp. 14878–14883, December 1996 Neurobiology Detection of cortical activation.

5.18 forms of interaction

Page 20: Fig 5.1 (probably better) Fig 4 p14882 Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA Vol. 93, pp. 14878–14883, December 1996 Neurobiology Detection of cortical activation.

Fig 5.19Henson, R. (2007) Efficient experimental design for fMRI. In Friston, K, Ashburner, J., Kiebel, S., Nicholls, T & Penny, W. (Eds.) Statistical Parametric Mapping. London: Academic Press. (pp 193-210) Plate 15 (p312)

Page 21: Fig 5.1 (probably better) Fig 4 p14882 Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA Vol. 93, pp. 14878–14883, December 1996 Neurobiology Detection of cortical activation.

Fig 5.20Fig a only – needs a considerably extended legend

Henson, R. (2007) Efficient experimental design for fMRI. In Friston, K, Ashburner, J., Kiebel, S., Nicholls, T & Penny, W. (Eds.) Statistical Parametric Mapping. London: Academic Press. (pp 193-210) Plate 17 (p312)

Page 22: Fig 5.1 (probably better) Fig 4 p14882 Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA Vol. 93, pp. 14878–14883, December 1996 Neurobiology Detection of cortical activation.

Fig 5.21

p4

Page 23: Fig 5.1 (probably better) Fig 4 p14882 Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA Vol. 93, pp. 14878–14883, December 1996 Neurobiology Detection of cortical activation.

Fig 5.22

Fig 4 p10

Page 24: Fig 5.1 (probably better) Fig 4 p14882 Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA Vol. 93, pp. 14878–14883, December 1996 Neurobiology Detection of cortical activation.

5.23 to do

• Resource and Badre-Wagner

Page 25: Fig 5.1 (probably better) Fig 4 p14882 Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA Vol. 93, pp. 14878–14883, December 1996 Neurobiology Detection of cortical activation.

Fig 5.24

Fig 1 p548

Page 26: Fig 5.1 (probably better) Fig 4 p14882 Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA Vol. 93, pp. 14878–14883, December 1996 Neurobiology Detection of cortical activation.

Fig 5.25

Fig 3 p551

Page 27: Fig 5.1 (probably better) Fig 4 p14882 Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA Vol. 93, pp. 14878–14883, December 1996 Neurobiology Detection of cortical activation.

Fig 5.26p1616 and p1620

Page 28: Fig 5.1 (probably better) Fig 4 p14882 Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA Vol. 93, pp. 14878–14883, December 1996 Neurobiology Detection of cortical activation.

Fig 5.27

p325

Page 29: Fig 5.1 (probably better) Fig 4 p14882 Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA Vol. 93, pp. 14878–14883, December 1996 Neurobiology Detection of cortical activation.

Fig 5.28

Model-testing figure omitted

a

b

Detecting Deception Using Functional MagneticResonance ImagingF. Andrew Kozel, Kevin A. Johnson, Qiwen Mu, Emily L. Grenesko, Steven J. Laken, and Mark S. George

Biological Psychiatry Volume 58, Issue 8, 605-613 Fig 1 p607 and 2 p609

Page 30: Fig 5.1 (probably better) Fig 4 p14882 Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA Vol. 93, pp. 14878–14883, December 1996 Neurobiology Detection of cortical activation.

Fig 5.29

p377

Page 31: Fig 5.1 (probably better) Fig 4 p14882 Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA Vol. 93, pp. 14878–14883, December 1996 Neurobiology Detection of cortical activation.

Fig 5.30

p213

Page 32: Fig 5.1 (probably better) Fig 4 p14882 Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA Vol. 93, pp. 14878–14883, December 1996 Neurobiology Detection of cortical activation.

Fig 5.31 - readingPhonological dyslexia and dysgraphia: Cognitivemechanisms and neural substratesSteven Z. Rapcsak a,b,c,*, Pe´lagie M. Beeson b,c, Maya L. Henry c, Anne Leyden c,Esther Kim c, Kindle Rising c, Sarah Andersen b,c and HyeSuk Choc

Fig 1a p579

Page 33: Fig 5.1 (probably better) Fig 4 p14882 Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA Vol. 93, pp. 14878–14883, December 1996 Neurobiology Detection of cortical activation.

Fig 5.32Phonological dyslexia and dysgraphia: Cognitivemechanisms and neural substratesSteven Z. Rapcsaka,b,c,*, Pe´lagie M. Beesonb,c, Maya L. Henryc, Anne Leydenc,Esther Kimc, Kindle Risingc, Sarah Andersenb,c and HyeSuk Choc

p577

Page 34: Fig 5.1 (probably better) Fig 4 p14882 Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA Vol. 93, pp. 14878–14883, December 1996 Neurobiology Detection of cortical activation.

Fig 5.33

p81

Page 35: Fig 5.1 (probably better) Fig 4 p14882 Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA Vol. 93, pp. 14878–14883, December 1996 Neurobiology Detection of cortical activation.

Fig 5.34

293-299

p296

Page 36: Fig 5.1 (probably better) Fig 4 p14882 Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA Vol. 93, pp. 14878–14883, December 1996 Neurobiology Detection of cortical activation.

Fig 5.35

p144

Page 37: Fig 5.1 (probably better) Fig 4 p14882 Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA Vol. 93, pp. 14878–14883, December 1996 Neurobiology Detection of cortical activation.

Fig 5.36

Same paper as 5.36 p 146

Page 38: Fig 5.1 (probably better) Fig 4 p14882 Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA Vol. 93, pp. 14878–14883, December 1996 Neurobiology Detection of cortical activation.

Fig 5.37

p1607

Page 39: Fig 5.1 (probably better) Fig 4 p14882 Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA Vol. 93, pp. 14878–14883, December 1996 Neurobiology Detection of cortical activation.

5.38 Binder & Mohr

• To show fig 3B (cuts 1- 5) of Binder & Mohr 1992 and controls 1 and 2 (LVF only) of fig 4 of Cohen et al 2000

• ((permissions to be sought later – both Brain))

Page 40: Fig 5.1 (probably better) Fig 4 p14882 Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA Vol. 93, pp. 14878–14883, December 1996 Neurobiology Detection of cortical activation.

Fig 5.39

Both p394

Page 41: Fig 5.1 (probably better) Fig 4 p14882 Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA Vol. 93, pp. 14878–14883, December 1996 Neurobiology Detection of cortical activation.
Page 42: Fig 5.1 (probably better) Fig 4 p14882 Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA Vol. 93, pp. 14878–14883, December 1996 Neurobiology Detection of cortical activation.

Fig 5.16old -deleted

Henson, R. (2007) Efficient experimental design for fMRI. In Friston, K, Ashburner, J., Kiebel, S., Nicholls, T & Penny, W. (Eds.) Statistical Parametric Mapping. London: Academic Press. (pp 193-210) Plate 16 (p312)


Recommended