+ All Categories
Home > Documents > Fillmore

Fillmore

Date post: 04-Jun-2018
Category:
Upload: clarklipman
View: 213 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend

of 23

Transcript
  • 8/13/2019 Fillmore

    1/23

    RESEARCH ARTICLE

    Petrological and geochemical constraints on the origin

    of adakites in the Garibaldi Volcanic Complex, southwestern

    British Columbia, Canada

    Julie Fillmore &Ian M. Coulson

    Received: 15 October 2010 /Accepted: 30 April 2013# Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2013

    Abstract The Garibaldi Volcanic Complex (GVC) is located

    in southwestern British Columbia and comprises two related

    but distinct volcanic fields: the Garibaldi Lake and the Mount

    Garibaldi volcanic fields. The rocks of the GVC range frombasalt to rhyolite, and analyses of samples from both fields

    distinguish these as adakites. The GVC magmas have high

    Sr/Y, Mg#, and Al2O3; low K2O/Na2O; and fractionated rare

    earth element compositions. Models of adakite genesis fall

    into two main groups: slab melting and non-slab melting.

    Adakites generated by slab melting commonly occur from

    young subducting crust (25 Ma) and are felsic partial melts

    of the subducting slab that interact with the mantle wedge

    during ascent. Non-slab melting models vary widely and

    include basalt fractionation, assimilation, fractional crystalli-

    zation processes and partial melting of mafic lower crust. Data

    from the GVC are too limited to fully elucidate the mecha-

    nisms of adakite genesis; however, the petrographical and

    geochemical characteristics of the GVC rocks in this study

    do not refute an origin by slab partial melts. Variations in trace

    elements that reflect non-adakitic values (e.g., low La, low Cr)

    are likely the result of magma mixing at shallow depths within

    the magma reservoirs of each center, for which there is min-

    eralogical and textural evidence. The adakite rocks of the

    GVC share geochemical traits akin to both low-SiO2adakite

    (LSA) and high-SiO2adakite (HSA) groups, though addition-

    al data are needed to investigate whether LSA- or HSA-type

    dominates within the GVC, and by extension, which should

    be the preferred model of adakite genesis.

    Keywords Adakite . Petrogenesis . Subduction-related

    magmas . Garibaldi Volcanic Complex

    Introduction

    Adakites are a group of intermediate to felsic igneous rocks

    formed in subduction zones involving relatively young, hotoceanic lithosphere (25 Ma). Since the introduction of the

    term adakiteby Defant and Drummond (1990), the petro-

    genesis of this suite of rocks has been the subject of contro-

    versy. Adakites are named after magnesian andesites first

    described by Kay (1978) from Adak Island in the Aleutians.

    These rocks are believed to be the result of partial melting of

    subducted ocean crust creating typically sodic slab melts.

    Partial melting of basalt to generate adakite is supported by

    experimental work (e.g., Rapp et al.1999) and evidenced in

    natural rocks from subduction zones (e.g., Schiano et al.

    1995). Adakites are characterized by specific geochemical

    features (Sr/Y40 and La/Yb20), and as studies into mag-

    ma genesis continued, an ever widening group of different

    models was suggested. Consequently, a wide range of mag-

    ma compositions from different tectonic environments have

    been classified as adakites. Models that explain the forma-

    tion of adakites fall into two main groups: genesis from slab

    partial melts and magmas generated by various methods that

    can reproduce the distinctive adakite chemistry (which are

    not necessarily subduction related). Further ambiguity arises

    when a suite of rocks are classified as adakites (which may

    not follow the parameters outlined by Defant and

    Drummond 1990) and are subsequently found not to be

    related to slab melting. This leads to the conclusion that

    adakites are not slab melts and has provided the means of

    using adakite to characterize many different rock types

    under the one name.

    The Garibaldi Volcanic Complex (GVC) is comprised of

    two fields, the Mount Garibaldi Volcanic Field (MGVF) in the

    south and the Garibaldi Lake Volcanic Field (GLVF) in the

    north. The GVC is Quaternary in age and is located in south-

    ern British Columbia (Figs. 1and2). Geochemical attributes

    of andesite and dacite rocks that comprise the GVC suggest

    Editorial responsibility: M. A. Clynne

    J. Fillmore (*) : I. M. Coulson

    Solid Earth Studies Laboratory, Department of Geology,

    University of Regina, Regina, SK S4S 0A2, Canada

    e-mail: [email protected]

    Bull Volcanol (2013) 75:730

    DOI 10.1007/s00445-013-0730-5

  • 8/13/2019 Fillmore

    2/23

    that they are the result of slab melting, under the definition put

    forth by Defant and Drummond (1990). Interactions between

    these melts and the overlying mantle wedge are also evident in

    their major and trace element compositions, a refinement

    made to the slab melt model by Martin et al. (2005). This

    study aims to: (1) present the first, complete whole-rock

    geochemistry for the MGVF as well as the first, complete rare

    earth element (REE) geochemistry of the intermediate rocks in

    the GLVF and (2) demonstrate that this chemistry identifies

    the rocks of the GVC as adakites.

    Regional geology

    The Garibaldi Volcanic Belt (GVB) extends from the

    CanadaUSA border northward into British Columbia for

    approximately 140 km (Fig. 1; Sherrod and Smith 1990).

    The GVC lies within the southern portion of the GVB

    between the towns of Whistler and Squamish and comprises

    two fields: the GLVF in the north and the MGVF in the

    south (Figs. 1 and 2). The volcanic rocks from the GLVF

    and the MGVF range in composition from basalt to rhyolite

    and have been previously interpreted to be the result of

    hydrous melting of the mantle wedge above the Juan de

    Fuca Plate, which is subducting beneath the North American

    Plate, and subsequent fractionation at various depths during

    ascent (Green 1977, 1981, 1990; Green and Harry 1999;

    Green and Sinha2005; Green et al. 1988). Basaltic volca-

    nism in the GVC is thought to be related to the decreased

    volatile content of the Juan de Fuca Plate and results in

    lower degrees of melting under higher pressures and tem-

    peratures (Green2006). The decreased slab flux is attributed

    to both a northward decrease in plate movement and plate

    age (Riddihough 1981, 1984; Green 1990; Wilson 2002).

    The younger, more buoyant Explorer Plate separated from

    the Juan de Fuca Plate at 4 Ma (Wilson 2002; Audet et al.

    2008), and this deviation may relate to an increase in

    Quaternary volcanism in the GVC.

    Subduction of the Explorer Plate beneath North America

    is slower than that of Juan de Fuca, and it has been sug-

    gested that the Explorer Plate is undergoing capture by the

    North American Plate (Audet et al.2008). The difference in

    subduction rates has caused a region of extension and slab

    thinning along the Nootka Fault zone (Fig. 1), a transform

    fault that fractured in response to an interval of ridge prop-

    agation and reorientation (Riddihough1984; Wilson1988;

    Madsen et al. 2006) and created the Explorer and Juan de

    Fuca plates. Independent movement of the Explorer Plate

    northward relative to the northeasterly movement of the

    Juan de Fuca Plate suggests that the subducted portions of

    the plates have separated in addition to the oceanic portions

    (Madsen et al. 2006). This segmentation coupled with the

    relative subduction vectors of the plates has resulted in a

    change in mantle flow. Recent studies (Madsen et al. 2006;

    YukonTerritory

    British Columbia

    Garibaldi volcanic belt

    Queen CharlotteTransform Fault

    ExplorerPlate

    Juan de

    Fuca Plate

    GVC (see Fig. 2)

    Washington0 100

    km

    200

    Squamish

    Whistler

    Pacific Plate

    Alaska

    Alberta

    NWT

    North American Plate

    Nootka fault zone

    Fig. 1 Location map of the

    GVC in southwestern British

    Columbia, with plate

    boundaries highlighted and

    relative plate motions of the

    Juan de Fuca and Explorer

    plates indicated. Map modified

    after Hickson et al. (1999) and

    Madsen et al. (2006)

    730, Page 2 of 23 Bull Volcanol (2013) 75:730

  • 8/13/2019 Fillmore

    3/23

  • 8/13/2019 Fillmore

    4/23

    The MGVF and the GLVF sit unconformably on the

    Coast Crystalline Complex, which is a series of meta-

    morphosed quartz diorite and granodiorite plutons of

    Cretaceous age. The MGVF is comprised of Mt.

    Garibaldi and its subsidiary vents, Dalton Dome and

    Atwell Peak, Opal Cone and the Ring Creek andesite

    flow, and Columnar Peak and the andesite flows of Paul

    Ridge. Recent activity in this field began at approximate-ly 700 ka with the eruption of hornblende andesite flows

    atop pre-1,300 ka hornblende andesite and basaltic an-

    desite. Increased volcanism occurred between 260 and

    220 ka with the eruption of hornblendeorthopyroxene

    andesite at Columnar Peak, followed by hornblende

    orthopyroxene dacite flows and minor pyroclastic materi-

    al from Mt. Garibaldi (Green et al. 1988). The composite

    dacite cone of Dalton Dome formed later but before the

    belt was overridden by glacial ice. Post-100 ka, dacitic

    pyroclastic flows were erupted from Atwell Peak atop

    the glacial ice as well as additional dacite flows from

    Dalton Dome. These flows and the west flank of AtwellPeak collapsed following glacial retreat (Mathews 1952,

    1958; Green 1990). The most recent volcanism in the

    GVC was the eruption of the Ring Creek andesite flow

    from Opal Cone between 10.7 and 9.3 ka (Brooks and

    Friele 1992), which extends for some 17.5 km south

    around Paul Ridge and then west toward Squamish

    River (Fig. 2).

    Quaternary volcanic centers in the GLVF include Black

    Tusk, Cinder Cone, Clinker Peak, Mt. Price, and The

    Table, as well as the Cheakamus Valley Basalts which

    were erupted from an unknown centre. Timing and erup-

    tive products from both fields have been summarized by

    previous authors (Green 1977, 1981, 1990; Green et al.

    1988) and are briefly outlined below. The oldest activity

    in the GLVF was at Black Tusk and Mt. Price with

    episodic volcanism beginning at 1,300 ka. The rocks of

    Black Tusk are hornblende andesite and orthopyroxene

    andesite flows. The oldest rocks of Mt. Price are a series

    of hornblende andesite and andesite flows followed by the

    formation of the hornblendebiotite andesite satellite cone

    along Garibaldi Lake. Volcanism ended in the Mt. Price

    area with the eruption of the Barrier and Culliton Creek

    andesite flows from Clinker Peak at 100 ka. Activity at

    Cinder Cone began post 100 ka with the formation of a

    tuff ring and the eruption of the basaltic andesite of

    Desolation Valley, followed by the Helm Creek basalt

    flow. The Table formed at 100 ka, when hornblende

    andesite magma erupted beneath the Cordilleran Ice

    Sheet and melted its way upward to form a steep, flat

    topped tuya (Mathews 1951; Green 1981). The olivine-

    bearing Cheakamus Valley Basalts were erupted post-

    100 ka, and eruptions continued episodically to approxi-

    mately 34 ka (Green 1977; Green et al. 1988).

    Petrography

    MGVF

    Ring Creek andesite

    Four samples were collected from the Ring Creek andesite:

    two taken proximal to Opal Cone (09JF007, 09JF008) andtwo taken approximately 2 km from the flow terminus

    (10JF022, 10JF023; see Fig. 2). The mineralogy of the

    proximal Ring Creek andesite differs from that of the distal

    portion of the flow (first noted by Sivertz1976), and hence,

    the petrography will be described separately.

    1. Proximal Ring Creek andesite

    The andesite is porphyritic; main phenocrysts are

    plagioclase (15 %), followed by hornblende (10 %)

    and augite (2 %). Quartz occurs in trace amounts

    (0.1 %). Biotite (3 %) is present as rare large xenocrysts

    (Fig.3a). Plagioclase occurs in two size populations; thelarger phenocrysts are approximately 2 mm in size and

    the smaller less than 1 mm. The majority of the plagio-

    clase crystals are subhedral, equant to tabular; more

    rarely, these form glomeroporphyritic aggregates.

    Several features are exhibited in plagioclase that in-

    cludes sieve textures, resorption of grain margins and

    in some of the larger crystals, seritization. An equal

    proportion of plagioclase phenocrysts, however, are

    inclusion-free and pristine. Hornblende phenocrysts

    are second to plagioclase in abundance and range in size

    from less than 0.5 up to 1 mm. The majority of the

    crystals exhibit various disequilibrium textures includ-

    ing fibrous cores of clinopyroxene and destabilization

    rims of opaque oxides along the crystal margins

    (Fig. 3b). Biotite occurs as subhedral xenocrysts up to

    1 mm in size with rare crystals up to 3 mm. The edges of

    biotite crystals are diffuse and poorly defined with rims

    showing alteration to a mass of fine-grained opaque

    minerals. The larger biotite xenocrysts are heavily

    embayed and have sieve-textured cores. With few ex-

    ceptions, these xenocrysts display extensive replace-

    ment by opaque oxide phases; resorption of grain

    boundaries is also common. Augite occurs as prismatic

    to equant crystals up to 3.5 mm in size. The margins of

    the phenocrysts are resorbed and contain abundant in-

    clusions of apatite and oxides. The crystals are greenish

    brown and not distinctly pleochroic. Only a few quartz

    crystals have been identified in this part of the flow. The

    phenocrysts are anhedral and less than 0.5 mm in size

    and exhibit resorption along the grain margins. The

    groundmass of the proximal Ring Creek andesite is

    approximately equal parts crystallites and brown glass.

    Plagioclase, augite, altered hornblende, and oxide

    730, Page 4 of 23 Bull Volcanol (2013) 75:730

  • 8/13/2019 Fillmore

    5/23

    a b

    c d

    e f

    hg

    i j

    k l

    Fig. 3 Thin section

    photomicrographs of the

    MGVF and GLVF rocks.a

    Biotite xenocryst from the

    proximal portion of the Ring

    Creek andesite. Cross-polarized

    light, FOV 5 mm.bHornblende

    phenocrysts from the proximal

    portion of the Ring Creek

    andesite; note the dark, veryfine-grained reaction rims along

    the crystal margins. Plane-

    polarized light, FOV 3 mm.c

    Mafic xenolith comprised of

    plagioclase and orthopyroxene

    in the distal portion of the Ring

    Creek andesite. Cross-polarized

    light, FOV 3 mm. d Weak flow

    banding observed in the distal

    portion of the Ring Creek

    andesite. Note,lower left, the

    quartz xenocryst with a reaction

    rim of fine-grained augite.

    Cross-polarized light, FOV

    5 mm. e, fGeneral textureobserved (cross-polarized light,

    FOV 3 mm) and concentrically

    zoned hornblende phenocrysts

    (cross-polarized light, FOV

    3 mm) present within the

    Columnar Peak dacite. g

    Plagioclase-rich nature of the

    Paul Ridge andesite, with

    rounded olivine (lower right).

    Cross-polarized light, FOV

    5 mm. h Olivine (second-order

    blue) being replaced by fibrous

    orthopyroxene (yellow) in Paul

    Ridge andesite sample. Cross-

    polarized light, FOV 3 mm.iStrongly altered biotite crystal

    with a rim of oxide phases in

    the Barrier andesite. Plane-

    polarized light, FOV 3 mm.j

    Glomeroporphyritic hornblende

    in the Barrier andesite. Plane-

    polarized light, FOV 3 mm.k

    Strongly resorbed and

    disaggregated orthopyroxene

    phenocryst in the Black Tusk

    andesite. Cross-polarized light,

    FOV 3 mm.l Coarser-grained

    crystal clot in the Black Tusk

    andesite. Cross-polarized light,

    FOV 3 mm

    Bull Volcanol (2013) 75:730 Page 5 of 23, 730

  • 8/13/2019 Fillmore

    6/23

    phases comprise the majority of the crystallites. Local

    flow banding is evident around the larger phenocrysts.

    2. Distal Ring Creek andesite

    The distal Ring Creek andesite is less porphyritic

    than the proximal portion and contains approximately

    20 % total phenocrysts. The mineralogy of the distal

    part of the flow differs from the proximal portion in thatthe only phenocryst phases present are plagioclase and

    augite. Xenoliths of mafic-intermediate cumulate inclu-

    sions that host orthopyroxene occur rarely. The inclu-

    sions are heavily corroded and partially melted

    (Fig.3c). Plagioclase, again occurring in two size pop-

    ulations, is the most abundant phenocryst (15 %),

    followed by augite (5 %). The larger plagioclase crystals

    are up to 3.5 mm in size, the smaller approximately

    1 mm; all crystals are equant to tabular and subhedral

    and display complex zonation and various degrees of

    resorption. Sieve-textured crystals are less common than

    the plagioclase in the proximal portion of the flow butoccur mainly in the larger grains that also contain con-

    centric trails of melt inclusions along their margins.

    Augite phenocrysts are smaller than plagioclase, com-

    monly less than 1 mm in size. The crystals are equant

    and subhedral to euhedral; some grains display simple

    twinning as well as glomeroporphyritic aggregates with

    plagioclase. Rare, altered, orthopyroxene crystals (up to

    2 mm in size) likely derived from the mafic-intermediate

    cumulate xenoliths are present but have been almost

    completely altered to chlorite and opaque oxides. Rare

    quartz is also present occurring as anhedral crystals that

    appear in disequilibrium with the surrounding melt, in

    exhibiting reaction rims of fine-grained, radiating clusters

    of augite (Fig. 3d). This is in contrast to the proximal

    portion of the flow where the quartz appears to be prima-

    ry. The groundmass is predominantly crystallites of pla-

    gioclase with lesser amounts of augite and brown glass.

    The groundmass displays local, weakly developed flow

    foliation.

    Columnar Peak

    Four samples from the orthopyroxene-hornblende dacite of

    Columnar Peak (09JF009, 09JF010, 10JF019, and 10JF020)

    were examined as part of this study. This unit is described as a

    series of flows by Green (1977). The dacite is porphyritic with

    10 to 15 % phenocrysts (Fig. 3e). Plagioclase is the most

    abundant phase (7 %), followed by hornblende (6 %) and

    orthopyroxene (

  • 8/13/2019 Fillmore

    7/23

    exhibits alteration to brown iddingsite along crystal edges

    and fractures. Embayments are also common in the crystals.

    A few quartz xenocrysts have been identified; the quartz is

    anhedral, usually exhibiting weakly uneven extinction. The

    quartz xenocrysts exhibit reaction rims and are surrounded

    by small augite crystals radiating outward. The groundmass

    is mainly brown glass with microlites of plagioclase and

    opaques.

    GLVF

    Barrier andesite

    Four samples (09JF004, 09JF005, 09JF006, 09JF012) were

    collected from the Barrier andesite lava flow along the

    northern shore of Garibaldi Lake. This flow is porphyritic,

    with 10 to 15 % phenocrysts. Plagioclase is the most abun-

    dant (10 %), followed by approximately equal amounts of

    hornblende and biotite (23 % each). Quartz phenocrysts

    occur rarely (

  • 8/13/2019 Fillmore

    8/23

    Table1

    Majorandminorelementcompositionofinvestigatedsamplesfromth

    eGaribaldiVolcanicComplex

    GaribaldiLakevolcanicfield

    Mt.Garibaldivolcanicfield

    BF

    BF

    BF

    BF

    BT

    RC

    RC

    RC

    RC

    CP

    CP

    PR

    PR

    PR

    Sample

    09JF004

    09JF00

    5

    09JF006

    09JF012

    10JF016

    09JF007

    09JF008

    10JF022

    10JF023

    09JF009

    09JF010

    09JF011

    10JF017

    10JF018

    SiO2

    59.74

    60.16

    59.35

    59.34

    59.58

    61.86

    60.34

    62.46

    62.57

    64.76

    64.56

    58.51

    56.31

    57.46

    TiO2

    0.61

    0.65

    0.67

    0.64

    0.63

    0.57

    0.57

    0.58

    0.5

    5

    0.39

    0.41

    0.65

    0.96

    0.78

    Al2O3

    18.52

    18.72

    18.80

    18.41

    18.37

    17.71

    17.97

    17.18

    17.52

    17.11

    17.19

    16.90

    18.51

    18.61

    Fe2O3(T)

    5.56

    5.40

    5.74

    5.64

    5.87

    4.82

    4.34

    4.78

    4.6

    6

    3.63

    3.88

    5.93

    8.06

    6.90

    MnO

    0.09

    0.09

    0.10

    0.10

    0.10

    0.09

    0.08

    0.09

    0.0

    8

    0.08

    0.09

    0.10

    0.14

    0.12

    MgO

    2.92

    2.76

    2.88

    3.05

    3.05

    2.37

    2.24

    2.52

    2.4

    0

    1.81

    1.95

    4.96

    3.42

    3.61

    CaO

    6.22

    6.13

    6.36

    6.27

    6.09

    5.78

    5.28

    5.51

    5.6

    5

    4.39

    4.52

    6.62

    6.39

    6.70

    Na2O

    4.62

    4.72

    4.69

    4.61

    4.47

    4.41

    4.29

    4.30

    4.3

    9

    4.44

    4.46

    4.19

    4.61

    4.37

    K2O

    1.19

    1.26

    1.19

    1.22

    1.25

    1.39

    1.37

    1.53

    1.4

    9

    1.71

    1.64

    1.14

    0.89

    1.16

    P2O5

    0.25

    0.28

    0.28

    0.26

    0.24

    0.26

    0.24

    0.25

    0.2

    4

    0.16

    0.16

    0.21

    0.33

    0.28

    LOI

    0.37

    0.20

    4.69

    0.46

    0.10

    0.78

    3.15

    0.63

    0.6

    3

    1.48

    0.77

    1.02

    0.21

    0.05

    Mg#

    51.2

    50.5

    50.1

    52.0

    51.0

    49.6

    50.8

    51.6

    51.1

    49.9

    50.1

    62.6

    45.9

    51.4

    K2O/Na2O

    0.26

    0.27

    0.25

    0.26

    0.28

    0.32

    0.32

    0.36

    0.3

    4

    0.39

    0.37

    0.27

    0.19

    0.27

    K/Rb

    678

    648

    619

    686

    788

    628

    653

    660

    668

    674

    706

    713

    881

    733

    SiO2/MgO

    20.5

    21.8

    20.6

    19.5

    19.5

    26.1

    26.9

    24.8

    26.1

    35.8

    33.1

    11.8

    16.5

    15.9

    Total

    100.20

    100.46

    100.26

    100.08

    99.85

    100.13

    99.97

    99.93

    100.27

    100.07

    99.73

    100.34

    99.91

    100.15

    TotalironreportedasFe2O3.

    Mg#=

    molarMg/(Mg+Fe)100

    ,whereFe=Total

    FeasFeO

    BFBarrierflow(andesite),

    BTBlackTusk(andesite),

    RC

    RingCreekflow(andesite),

    CPColumnarPeak(dacite),

    PRPau

    lRidge(basalticandesite/andesite)

    730, Page 8 of 23 Bull Volcanol (2013) 75:730

  • 8/13/2019 Fillmore

    9/23

    Table2

    Traceandrareeartheleme

    ntcompositionofinvestigatedsamplesfrom

    theGaribaldiVolcanicComplex

    GaribaldiLakevolcanicfield

    Mt.Garibaldivolcanicfield

    BF

    BF

    BF

    BF

    BT

    RC

    RC

    RC

    RC

    CP

    CP

    PR

    PR

    PR

    Sample

    09JF004

    09JF005

    09JF006

    09JF012

    10JF016

    09JF007

    09JF008

    10JF022

    10JF

    023

    09JF009

    09JF010

    09JF011

    10JF017

    10JF018

    Sc

    d/l

    11

    d/l

    d/l

    11

    11

    d/l

    10

    11

    10

    d/l

    14

    15

    8

    V

    97

    96

    99

    99

    98

    85

    86

    84

    81

    63

    63

    110

    133

    121

    Cr

    32

    29

    29

    31

    21

    32

    32

    18

    17

    21

    23

    132

    18

    31

    Ni

    43

    34

    38

    39

    56

    28

    30

    30

    26

    42

    30

    103

    30

    48

    Cu

    41

    37

    41

    39

    75

    41

    49

    59

    50

    22

    51

    71

    66

    100

    Zn

    33

    34

    30

    35

    28

    30

    23

    26

    25

    14

    17

    45

    53

    40

    Ga

    17.1

    17.8

    17.9

    17.9

    18.9

    17.6

    18.0

    18.4

    18.7

    15.4

    16.3

    17.0

    20.0

    19.1

    Rb

    14.6

    16.2

    16.0

    14.9

    13.2

    18.5

    18.1

    19.4

    18.7

    21.4

    19.5

    13.3

    8.4

    13.1

    Sr

    1,000.3

    957.8

    982.4

    1,023.5

    909.8

    1,068.4

    1,078.6

    1,012.2

    1,02

    6.8

    752.0

    784.8

    957.9

    838.7

    868.7

    Y

    11.9

    13.1

    12.5

    11.4

    12.0

    11.9

    10.9

    13.2

    12.6

    9.5

    10.1

    11.8

    17.1

    14.0

    Zr

    90.2

    101.8

    101.9

    92.5

    91.5

    117.9

    115.7

    119.7

    111.7

    91.5

    100.5

    104.2

    91.4

    101.1

    Nb

    5.3

    7.3

    7.4

    5.6

    3.3

    4.4

    4.7

    4.5

    4.2

    4.3

    4.2

    4.0

    3.8

    3.7

    Ba

    441.1

    477.0

    450.6

    441.5

    436.3

    478.0

    469.5

    561.9

    549.4

    580.7

    558.8

    390.7

    467.1

    457.9

    Pb

    2.2

    2.8

    3.3

    4.4

    6.5

    4.6

    3.0

    7.3

    8.2

    d/l

    4.7

    3.5

    6.6

    7.3

    Th

    1.4

    1.6

    1.5

    1.4

    1.3

    1.9

    1.9

    2.1

    2.1

    2.7

    2.6

    2.7

    0.8

    1.4

    U

    0.6

    0.7

    0.6

    0.6

    0.6

    0.7

    0.7

    0.8

    0.8

    1.1

    1.1

    0.9

    0.3

    0.5

    La

    12.01

    13.46

    13.68

    12.03

    10.73

    14.87

    15.24

    17.13

    16.9

    0

    13.02

    12.85

    15.11

    11.54

    12.03

    Ce

    26.61

    28.80

    29.27

    26.21

    24.00

    32.56

    33.40

    37.25

    36.3

    7

    27.09

    26.83

    32.12

    26.54

    27.27

    Pr

    3.58

    3.77

    3.86

    3.53

    3.27

    4.25

    4.39

    4.87

    4.73

    3.30

    3.30

    4.04

    3.78

    3.74

    Nd

    15.11

    15.79

    16.09

    14.78

    14.32

    17.48

    17.82

    20.11

    19.4

    6

    12.90

    12.90

    16.46

    17.49

    16.63

    Sm

    3.22

    3.19

    3.24

    3.05

    3.09

    3.31

    3.36

    3.83

    3.65

    2.36

    2.42

    2.98

    4.02

    3.56

    Eu

    1.03

    1.06

    1.09

    0.99

    1.00

    1.03

    0.99

    1.07

    1.08

    0.75

    0.76

    0.98

    1.35

    1.12

    Gd

    2.68

    2.96

    2.86

    2.73

    2.80

    2.72

    2.40

    3.05

    2.94

    1.93

    1.98

    2.48

    4.00

    3.48

    Tb

    0.39

    0.42

    0.42

    0.39

    0.41

    0.39

    0.36

    0.42

    0.41

    0.29

    0.30

    0.36

    0.58

    0.48

    Dy

    2.33

    2.48

    2.47

    2.22

    2.37

    2.24

    2.07

    2.39

    2.30

    1.71

    1.73

    2.11

    3.42

    2.87

    Ho

    0.47

    0.47

    0.49

    0.45

    0.46

    0.43

    0.39

    0.46

    0.45

    0.34

    0.34

    0.43

    0.68

    0.57

    Er

    1.25

    1.32

    1.33

    1.27

    1.33

    1.20

    1.13

    1.27

    1.27

    0.94

    0.98

    1.18

    1.98

    1.58

    Tm

    0.19

    0.19

    0.19

    0.17

    0.19

    0.17

    0.16

    0.19

    0.18

    0.14

    0.14

    0.17

    0.28

    0.23

    Yb

    1.26

    1.29

    1.31

    1.19

    1.25

    1.19

    1.11

    1.28

    1.19

    1.01

    1.01

    1.17

    1.85

    1.53

    Lu

    0.19

    0.20

    0.20

    0.18

    0.19

    0.18

    0.17

    0.19

    0.18

    0.15

    0.16

    0.18

    0.28

    0.22

    Sr/Y

    83.9

    73.4

    78.7

    89.5

    75.8

    89.9

    98.6

    76.7

    81.5

    79.2

    78.0

    81.5

    49.0

    62.1

    La/Yb

    9.53

    10.43

    10.44

    10.11

    8.58

    12.50

    13.73

    13.38

    14.2

    0

    12.89

    12.72

    12.91

    6.24

    7.86

    Elementalconcentrationsexpressed

    inpartspermillion

    d/lbelowdetectionlimit

    ,BFBarrierflow,

    BTBlackTusk;RC

    RingCreekflow

    ,CPColumnarPeak

    ,PRPaulRidge

    Bull Volcanol (2013) 75:730 Page 9 of 23, 730

  • 8/13/2019 Fillmore

    10/23

    were prepared from fusion blanks. Oxide corrections on

    the middle and heavy REE were made offline using

    oxide production rates determined daily from single

    REE standard solutions. Rock-sample detection limits

    (based on three times the background standard deviation)

    are 10 ppb for La through Pr and 5 ppb for Nd through

    Lu. A set of three internal laboratory reference materials

    are fused and run with each batch of samples to evaluatelong-term precision. Precision was additionally evaluated

    through repeat measurements of samples, including re-

    peat fusions and dilution; it is better than 3 % relative

    standard deviation in all cases. Accuracy was evaluated

    using a series of six standard reference materials (SRMs)

    that span the sample concentration range, prepared using

    the same procedure as the samples. Our determinations

    agree with the accepted values for these SRMs with

    discrepancies of less than 5 %.

    Results

    Nine samples were analyzed from the MGVF: three samples

    of the Paul Ridge andesite, two from the Columnar Peak

    dacite, and four samples of the Ring Creek andesite (two

    from the proximal part of the flow and two from the distal

    portion). Another four samples from the Barrier andesite in

    the GLVF and one sample from Black Tusk were also

    analyzed (see Tables 1 and 2). The geochemistry of the

    GLVF is well documented in several other studies (Green

    1977,1981,1990; Green and Henderson1984), and select

    data from these studies have been included for comparison

    in this work. The investigated MGVF and GLVF rocks are

    sub-alkaline in character ranging in composition from ba-

    saltic andesite to dacite, with the bulk of samples falling in

    the andesite field (Figs. 4 and 5). All the GVC samples

    define similar trends as individual centers in several major

    and trace element variation diagrams (Figs. 4 and 6). The

    volcanic products from each centre are characterized by

    decreasing Fe2O3, CaO, and V with increasing SiO2. MgO

    is increasing in the Paul Ridge andesite with increasing

    SiO2, as does TiO2in the Barrier andesite. All other centers

    in the GVC have decreasing MgO and TiO2with increasing

    SiO2. Al2O3 decreases only slightly as SiO2 increases with

    alumina concentrations spanning a range of about 1.5 wt.%.

    Ni, Cr, and Na2O do not vary significantly with increasing

    SiO2, forming relatively flat trends. K2O and Rb contents

    generally increase with SiO2 for all centers, as does Sr for

    the Paul Ridge and Black Tusk andesites. Sr in the Barrier

    andesite increases to approximately 60 wt.% SiO2and then

    decrease sharply; a similar trend is seen for The Table

    andesite at approximately 58 wt.% SiO2. Sr decreases with

    increasing SiO2 for the Ring Creek andesite and the

    Columnar Peak dacite. The Mg#

    s of all the GVC rocks

    exhibit a relatively narrow range (46 to 52), except for the

    Paul Ridge andesite, where one sample has Mg# of 62.

    Primitive mantle-normalized multi-element spider dia-

    grams show that all centers have LILE enrichment and

    NbTi-negative anomalies, typical of subduction-related

    rocks (Fig.7a and b). The Paul Ridge andesite rocks exhibit

    the strongest depletion of Th, Rb, U, and other incompatible

    elements and the highest MREE-HREE abundances of allthe GVC rocks. One andesite from Paul Ridge (09JF011;

    see Tables1and2) has higher MgO, TiO2, Ni, and Cr values

    than the other samples. Chondrite-normalized REE spider

    diagrams (Fig.8a and b) for the GVC volcanic rocks display

    enrichment of LREE over HREE and lack any significant

    Eu anomalies. The andesites of Black Tusk display the

    lowest LREE/HREE fractionation of all the GVC volcanic

    rocks with La/YbNaveraging 5.9. The Ring Creek andesite

    samples exhibit the highest fractionation with La/YbNrang-

    ing from 8.5 to 9.6. All of the GVC rocks have similar

    MREE/HREE fractionation with ratios of 1.5 to 1.9.

    On a Sr/Y versus Y diagram, all of the GVC rocks plotwithin the adakite field but fall outside of this field on the

    La/Yb versus Yb diagram, having values typical of normal

    arc-rocks (Fig. 6fg). The accepted minimum value for

    La/Yb as an adakitic indicator ranges from as low as

    8 (Drummond and Defant 1990) up to 20 and greater

    (Castillo et al. 1999; Richards and Kerrich 2007). The

    La/Yb values for the GVC have a range of6 (Paul Ridge

    andesite) to 14.2 (Ring Creek andesite), plotting in the lower

    end of the adakite field. When plotted against SiO2, both

    Sr/Y and La/Yb appear to increase for the Paul Ridge

    andesite rocks in contrast to the other GVC centers, for

    which Sr/Y decreases with SiO2 but La/Yb increases (not

    shown). Other adakitic indices (Sr, Na2O, Al2O3) do not

    show definitive trends with fractionation indices (SiO2, Ni,

    Cr), suggesting that the chemistry is not controlled exclu-

    sively by fractionation processes (Chiaradia 2009). The

    GVC rocks may also be divided into the low-SiO2 and

    high-SiO2 adakite (LSA and HSA) groups on the basis of

    geochemical characteristics outlined for adakitic rocks by

    Martin et al. (2005). On a K/Rb versus SiO2/MgO diagram,

    the Paul Ridge and Black Tusk andesite rocks exhibit high

    K/Rb relative to SiO2/MgO and form a sub-vertical trend

    (Fig. 9a) indicative of LSA; previously published data for

    The Table andesite samples also follow this trend. The Ring

    Creek andesite and the Columnar Peak dacite have lower

    K/Rb values and plot sub-horizontally. The Barrier andesite

    samples appear transitional, plotting at the intersection be-

    tween the LSA and HSA trends. This may relate to the

    slightly elevated Rb contents of Barrier andesite samples

    and their SiO2values, which lie at the boundary between the

    LSA and HSA groups. The LSA and HSA groupings are

    still evident, though not as well defined in the Sr-

    K/Rb-(SiO2/MgO)*100 ternary diagram (Fig. 9b). Here,

    730, Page 10 of 23 Bull Volcanol (2013) 75:730

  • 8/13/2019 Fillmore

    11/23

    only the Columnar Peak dacite is distinctly HSA and The

    Table andesite rocks are clearly LSA.

    Discussion

    The rocks of the GVC exhibit geochemical characteristics

    that favor their classification as adakites. Adakites are

    characterized by 56 wt.% SiO2, 15 wt.% Al2O3, usually

    3 wt.% MgO (rarely6 wt.%), 18 ppm Y, 1.9 ppm Yb

    and Sr contents >400 ppm and were originally believed to

    be associated with the subduction of young oceanic crust

    (25 Ma; Defant and Drummond 1990). Since the in-

    troduction of the term adakite, this definition has been

    expanded to now include a wide range of compositions

    and geological settings based on certain geochemical

    Fig. 4 Harker diagrams illustrating variations in major element chemistry

    with increasing SiO2 (oxide wt.%). Key: RCRing Creek, CPColumnar

    Peak,PRPaul Ridge,BTBlack Tusk,BFBarrier flow, open squares, open

    circles, and crossesrepresent previously published data for the Black Tusk,

    Barrier flow, and The Table centers, respectively (data derive from Green

    1977,1981; Green and Henderson1984). All data have been recalculated

    to 100 % on an anhydrous basis

    Bull Volcanol (2013) 75:730 Page 11 of 23, 730

  • 8/13/2019 Fillmore

    12/23

    indicators, specifically high Sr/Y (>40) and La/Yb

    (>20) (e.g., Castillo et al. 1999; Xu et al. 2000). This

    has led to some confusion in the literature and a gen-

    eral misuse of the term adakite, such that any rock

    type from any geological environment that has high

    Sr/Y and/or high La/Yb has been called adakite or

    adakite-like. To make valid use of adakite as a petro-

    genetic indicator, a suite of geochemical and petrolog-

    ical features as well as spatial associations is required.

    Defant and Drummond (1990) first introduced the term

    adakite and the criterion by which they are defined.

    Hence, it is to this definition that the rocks of the

    GVC have been evaluated.

    Adakite Genesis

    The majority of the models for adakite genesis fall into

    two main categories: slab melting and non-slab melting.

    In simple terms, the slab melting model reads that young,

    hot subduction zones retain enough residual heat in the

    slab to allow it to melt at shallower than typical depths

    (Defant and Drummond 1990). Adakite magmas may also

    form in response to flat subduction (e.g., Gutscher et al.

    2000) or as a result of slab edge melting at slab windows

    (Thorkelson and Breitsprecher 2005). Slab partial melts

    are dacitic in composition with a restite rich in garnet

    amphibole but plagioclase-poor. The melts react with the

    Fig. 5 a, b Total alkali versus

    silica diagram with IUGS rock

    designations for the GVC

    center rocks (after Le Bas and

    Streckeisen1991).bRepresents

    an enlargement of the area

    where GVC samples fall.

    Dashed line represents the

    alkalinesubalkaline boundary

    from Macdonald (1968).Symbolsas in Fig. 4

    730, Page 12 of 23 Bull Volcanol (2013) 75:730

  • 8/13/2019 Fillmore

    13/23

    overlying mantle wedge during ascent, modifying their

    major and compatible element chemistries (e.g., increased

    Mg#, CaO, Ni, Cr, lower SiO2) but keeping diagnostic

    trace element concentrations and ratios intact (Sr, Y, REE;

    Moyen2009), which remain recognizable as having a slab

    melt origin. Other models for adakite genesis that are not

    associated with slab melting include partial melting of

    mafic lower continental crust (Huang and He 2010),

    fractional crystallization of basaltic magma containing

    garnet (Macpherson et al. 2006; Coldwell et al. 2011)

    and high pressure assimilation, fractional crystallization

    (AFC) processes of mantle-derived melts, and magma

    mixing (Chiaradia et al. 2009). The slab melt model

    has been refined by Martin et al. (2005). Using a

    database of >340 adakite analyses (previously compiled

    by Martin and Moyen 2003), Martin et al. (2005) pro-

    posed that adakites should exhibit the following

    characteristics: >3.5 wt.% Na2O, K2O/Na2O ratios of0.42,

    an Mg# of approximately 50, FeO+MgO+MnO+TiO2

    7 wt.%, and relatively high Ni (24 ppm) and Cr

    Fig. 6 (ag) Harker diagrams illustrating variations in trace element

    chemistry for the GVC centre rocks, with increasing SiO2. Plots of

    adakitic indices for GVC rocks: fSr/Y versus Y and g La/Yb versus

    Yb. Key symbology as in Fig. 4; adakite and normal arc-rock fields

    derive from Castillo (2006) and Richards and Kerrich (2007)

    Bull Volcanol (2013) 75:730 Page 13 of 23, 730

  • 8/13/2019 Fillmore

    14/23

    (36 ppm). As a result, Martin et al. (2005) introduced two

    different groups of adakite, a high-SiO2adakite (HSA) and a

    low SiO2(LSA) adakite. HSA contains >60 wt.% SiO2, lower

    MgO (0.5 to 4 wt.%), CaO+Na2O < 11 wt. %, and Sr contents

    < 1100 ppm. LSA contain 10 wt.% CaO+Na2O, and Sr in excess of 1,000 ppm. These

    two groups are also differentiated by other trace elements and

    REE (Martin et al.2005). LSA have higher LREE contents, a

    Fig. 7 a Primitive mantle-

    normalized spidergrams for

    GVC samples analyzed in this

    study, and b for previously

    published data. Data in (b)

    derive from Green and

    Henderson (1984). Primitive

    mantle normalizing values are

    from Lyubetskaya and

    Korenaga (2007).Symbolsas inFig.4

    730, Page 14 of 23 Bull Volcanol (2013) 75:730

  • 8/13/2019 Fillmore

    15/23

    more pronounced positive Sr anomaly and are generally

    Rb-poor compared with HSA. The petrogenesis of LSA

    and HSA are both related to slab melting, but the

    magma sources are thought to differ. Martin et al.

    (2005) suggested that HSA are slab melts that have

    assimilated mantle wedge peridotite during ascent, prior

    to eruption. LSA are not primary slab melts, but the

    result of partial melting of mantle wedge peridotite that

    Fig. 8 a Chondrite-normalized

    REE spidergram for GVC

    samples analyzed in this study,

    and b for previously published

    data. Data in (b) derive from

    Green and Henderson (1984).

    Chondrite normalizing values

    are from Sun and McDonough

    (1989). Symbolsas in Fig.4

    Bull Volcanol (2013) 75:730 Page 15 of 23, 730

  • 8/13/2019 Fillmore

    16/23

    has been metasomatized by slab-derived melts. Adakite

    rocks as defined by Defant and Drummond (1990) are

    classified as HSA.

    Adakite Geochemistry in the GVC

    The rocks analyzed in this study and previously published

    data conform to virtually all of the adakitic geochemical

    traits put forward by Defant and Drummond (1990) and

    Martin et al. (2005). However, there are some variations in

    trace and major element contents which illustrate a more

    typical arc-like magma composition for the GVC. Thesevariations are likely the result of mixing between pre-

    existing, HSA magmas and intruding non-adakitic magmas

    in the small, intermittent magma chambers beneath the

    various centers. Despite this mixing, trace element ratios

    and REE concentrations indicative of slab partial melts are

    preserved in the investigated GVC rocks. While determined

    Sr/Y ratios for the GVC cover a wide range (38109;

    Fig. 6f, Table 2), the majority of values fall between 75

    and 90. Some of the previously published data (Black Tusk

    and the Barrier flow, in particular) straddle the boundary

    between adakite and normal arc-rocks, which appears to be

    related to elevated Y contents reported in these earlier pub-lished data. Moreover, all of the GVC samples have La/Yb

    ratios that lie in the normal arc-rock field and not in the

    adakite field (Fig.6g). This is a function of the low La in the

    GVC versus the Yb contents, which are typical of adakites

    (

  • 8/13/2019 Fillmore

    17/23

    andesite (09JF011) is considerably higher in SiO2, Ni, Cr,

    and MgO content and lower in Fe2O3 than the other two

    andesite samples analyzed. Hence, it is likely that this more

    mafic sample did not have the same mixing components, or

    perhaps underwent a stronger mixing process in the volcano

    than the other Paul Ridge andesite samples. Green (1977)

    noted that some minor pyroclastic material was present at

    Paul Ridge, but individual flows were not identified. It ispossible that the more mafic sample taken from the northern

    part of Paul Ridge may represent a pyroclastic component

    that has a stronger basaltic character and may be more

    geochemically similar to the intruding basaltic magma com-

    pared with the other andesite samples.

    For the Ring Creek andesite, there is no evidence of

    interaction with a basaltic intruding magma and mixing

    relationships are less clear, suggesting that the mixing com-

    ponents were of a similar composition. The mineralogy of

    the Ring Creek andesite varies from an augitehornblende

    biotite-bearing assemblage in the proximal portion of the

    flow to augite only in the distal portion. The proximalandesite also appears to contain primary quartz, where

    quartz crystals in the distal Ring Creek andesite show

    disequilibrium with the surrounding melt and hence, is

    difficult to explain through a simple mixing process.

    However, Sivertz (1976) in mapping the Ring Creek an-

    desite and Opal Cone also noted this difference in miner-

    alogy, concluding that the hydrous mineral assemblage in

    the proximal Ring Creek andesite was identical to the

    mineralogy of Opal Cone itself. It is plausible, therefore,

    that the proximal Ring Creek andesite entrained material

    from Opal Cone during eruption and inherited the horn-

    blendebiotitequartz mineralogy.

    Mixing can result from convective overturn initiated by

    intrusion of hotter magma from depth, but there is no evi-

    dence of mixing between compositionally distinct magmas

    in the Ring Creek andesite. Magma chamber overturn be-

    tween magmas of a similar composition can be caused if the

    intruding magma has a high upward momentum (Turner and

    Campbell1986), or was significantly hotter. The Ring Creek

    andesite flow is unusually extensive for an intermediate to

    felsic composition, approximately 17 to 18 km in length

    (Sivertz 1976; Green 1977; Brooks and Friele 1992). It

    represents predominantly effusive volcanism with no evi-

    dence of any pyroclastic component associated with the

    flow. Sivertz (1976) described lapilli and block fragments

    of dacitic composition, but this material is only found within

    Opal Cone. The large extent of the Ring Creek andesite flow

    and the lack of any significant pyroclastic material might

    suggest that intrusion of a large volume of relatively fast

    moving magma (the proximal andesite) of similar composi-

    tion into pre-existing, cooling magma (the distal andesite)

    within the magma chamber created turbulence that facilitat-

    ed entrainment of wall-rock material from Opal Cone as the

    eruption proceeded. It is not known to what extent the

    hornblendebiotitequartz mineralogy is present in the

    Ring Creek andesite further south; access to the center

    portion of the flow is very limited (Sivertz1976).

    In the Black Tusk andesite, mixing relationships are not as

    evident as for other centers within the GVC. The lava is

    essentially aphyric, but the phenocrysts that are present are

    strongly resorbed. This suggests that an intruding lava waslikely significantly hotter than the pre-existing magma, which

    results in the near-total resorption of the phenocrysts and

    obscures any other meltcrystal relationships. Additionally,

    the intruding magma appears to be a very similar composition

    to the resident magma; both are comprised of the same min-

    eralogy. This may indicate that the volume of the intruding

    magma was large, in order to superheat the system and

    allow for the disaggregation of all the phenocrysts. Mixing

    in the Barrier andesite was likely between that of a dacitic

    pre-existing magma and an andesitic intruding magma. This

    is evidenced by reaction rims of augite on quartz pheno-

    crysts and strongly embayed biotite crystals. Hornblendeappears to be in equilibrium with the intruding andesitic

    lava; there are few disequilibrium features in the pheno-

    crysts except for rims of opaques along the grain margins,

    and these may be the result of hornblende being removed

    from its stability field during ascent. At Columnar Peak,

    both the pre-existing and intruding magmas appear to be

    compositionally alike. There are disequilibrium features in

    the plagioclase and hornblende phenocrysts, but the intrud-

    ing magma generally contains the same mineralogy, with

    the exception of minor orthopyroxene (

  • 8/13/2019 Fillmore

    18/23

    Interaction with mantle peridotite

    The Ni, Cr, and Mg# values for the GVC adakite rocks are

    generally higher than normal andesite and dacite (20 ppm,

    2025 ppm, and 42, respectively) and, due to the lack of

    evidence of a basaltic mixing component for the majority of

    the GVC (with the exception of the Paul Ridge andesite),

    these values likely reflect the interaction of HSA magmaswith mantle peridotite during ascent. Increasing the Mg#,

    Ni, and Cr concentrations in slab melts by assimilation of

    peridotite (as described for HSA by Martin et al.2005) is an

    unlikely process for the GVC. Typical mantle peridotite

    contains 3,200 ppm Cr, 2,300 ppm Ni, and 42 wt.%

    MgO (Sigurdsson et al. 2000). To obtain the values ob-

    served in the GVC adakites, assimilation of peridotite would

    be strongly limited (1 % assimilation to obtain the Cr

    values of GVC). Furthermore, peridotite begins to melt at

    approximately 1,200 C (at lower pressures) and exceeds

    that of the dacitic (900 C) slab melt, precluding any

    significant partial melting of the peridotite. A more likelyprocess would be zone refining, whereby the ascending

    HSA magma gains Ni, Cr, and MgO by diffusion. This

    process enriches the adakite magma in mafic components

    and lowers SiO2, but preserves the incompatible element

    ratios of the slab-melt, as the diffusion rates of incompatible

    elements (e.g., REE, Y) would be too slow to significantly

    modify the ascending magma (Wilson 1989) and obscure

    the slab-melt signature.

    LSA versus HSA

    Geochemical characteristics distinguish the Columnar Peak

    dacite and the Ring Creek andesite rock as mainly HSA and

    the Paul Ridge andesite and the Black Tusk andesite as

    predominantly LSA. Previously published data from The

    Table andesite are also considered and fall within the LSA

    field. The Barrier andesite rocks appear transitional between

    the two groups. LSA are best differentiated from HSA in

    terms of K/Rb versus SiO2/MgO, and Sr-

    K/Rb-(SiO2/MgO)*100 diagrams (see Fig. 9a and b). LSA

    and HSA define an almost perpendicular relationship on the

    K/Rb versus SiO2/MgO diagram, with LSA plotting at

    higher values of K/Rb whereas K/Rb ratios for HSA remain

    relatively uniform. On the Sr-K/Rb-(SiO2/MgO)*100 terna-

    ry diagram, the relationship for the GVC rock is less clear;

    HSA forms a group close to the (SiO2/MgO)*100 apex and

    LSA plots towards the center of the plot. The Black Tusk

    and Paul Ridge andesites fall clearly in the LSA field in

    Fig. 9a, but both centers plot closer to the HSA field in

    Fig. 9b. Other discrimination diagrams that compare LSA

    and HSA are shown in Fig.10acand illustrate the lack of a

    definite separation of LSA and HSA groupings in the GVC.

    The dashed fields and insets representing LSA and HSA in

    Figs. 9 and 10 are from the data presented in Martin et

    al. (2005), which included analyses that had extreme

    values (K/Rb up to 3,000, average Sr> 2,000 ppm, Nb

    up to 20 ppm). For the range of values in the GVC

    (K/Rb660880, Sr7501,300 ppm, Nb8 ppm),

    LSA and HSA generally plot in the same space, creating

    further confusion.

    On a primitive mantle-normalized spider diagram (Fig. 7a

    b), LSA differs from HSA by lower Rb and higher Nb values,

    with a positive Sr anomaly and no Ti anomaly (Martin et al.

    2005). The GVC rocks generally characterized as LSA (Paul

    0

    2

    4

    6

    8

    10

    45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80

    MgO

    SiO2

    0

    5

    10

    15

    20

    25

    45 55 65 75

    Nb(ppm)

    SiO2

    0

    500

    1000

    1500

    2000

    2500

    3000

    3500

    0 5 10 15

    Sr(ppm)

    CaO + Na2O

    MgO%

    SiO %2

    8

    6

    4

    2

    045 50 55 60 6 5 7 0 75

    LSA

    HSA

    Nb ppm

    20

    15

    10

    5

    045 50 55 60 65 7 0 75 SiO %2

    LSA

    HSA

    r ppm3000

    2500

    2000

    1500

    1000

    500

    00 5 10 (CaO+Na O%)2

    LSA

    HSA

    Fig. 10 aMgO versus SiO2,bNb versus SiO2, andc Sr versus CaO+

    Na2O discriminant diagrams illustrating the variability of HSA and

    LSA compositions in the GVC dataset. Insetplots in (ac) are modi-

    fied from Martin et al. (2005).Symbolsas in Fig. 4

    730, Page 18 of 23 Bull Volcanol (2013) 75:730

  • 8/13/2019 Fillmore

    19/23

    Ridge and Black Tusk andesite rocks) have lower Rb, but also

    lower Nb and similar Sr to HSA, as well as a negative Ti

    anomaly. Similarly, the Ring Creek andesite and the

    Columnar Peak dacite, which are predominantly HSA, have

    higher Nb and Sr (on average), typically a characteristic of

    LSA. The Barrier andesite has Rb values between the Paul

    Ridge and Columnar Peak rocks, but also the highest Nb

    contents of all GVC rocks (up to 8 ppm). The Table andesitesamples are the only rocks which exhibit all of the LSA

    characteristics; the andesite rocks have the highest Nb and Sr

    with no Ti anomaly (Fig. 7b). The Table andesite rocks also

    consistently plot in the LSA fields in Figs. 9and10.

    Isotopic concentrations and effects of crustal interactions

    Stern and Kilian (1996) noted that the effects of crustal

    interactions were present in adakite rocks from the Austral

    Volcanic Zone (AVZ), and these decreased southward in the

    belt as the angle of subduction became more orthogonal.

    This resulted in negligible interaction of the Cook Islandadakites with crustal material and hence, their Sr, Nd, Pb,

    and O isotopic compositions more closely resemble MORB

    (and by extension, slab partial melt) values. Crustal contam-

    ination has been suggested to contribute to the chemistry of

    the GVC lavas (Green1990; Green and Henderson1984),

    specifically in the MGVF, based upon 87Rb/86Sr and87

    Sr/86

    Sr isotopic data. Green (1990) stated that the Mount

    Garibaldi rocks contain a significant Rb-rich crustal compo-

    nent based on higher 87Rb/86Sr isotopes than the GLVF and

    that these values reflected AFC processes combined with

    contamination from crustal xenoliths and mixing with

    anatectic melts during ascent. While mixing of melts is

    present in the MGVF, there is little evidence for the incor-

    poration of crustal xenoliths in any rocks examined as part

    of this study. Rare xenoliths are present in the Ring Creek

    andesite but are mafic to intermediate in composition and

    would not significantly modify Rb values. Lower Rb values

    in the GLVF (418 ppm) was suggested by Green (1990) to

    reflect a depletion of LILE in the source region and less

    crustal interaction than the Mount Garibaldi rocks. For the

    MGVF rocks in this study, the Rb concentrations are com-

    parable to that determined by Green (1990) for the GLVF

    (average 14.5 ppm). Similarly, the high 87Rb/86Sr values are

    in samples that are rhyodacite to rhyolite in composition,

    which is more felsic than the rocks examined in this study.

    Green (1990) did not specify the exact sample locations, but

    rhyodacite is present in Mount Garibaldi itself and may be

    the location represented by the data presented by Green

    (1990). Determination of isotopic data was not within the

    scope of this work, and any conclusions on the effects of

    crustal interaction in the GVC cannot be fully elucidated.

    Similarly, while the above interpretations can account for

    the geochemical variations seen in the GVC, it must be

    noted that future, more detailed studies with a larger dataset

    may argue against these hypotheses.

    Origin of the GVC Adakites

    The lack of a clear distinction between LSA and HSA

    groups and limited data preclude a complete assessment of

    adakite genesis within the GVC. However, data from theGVC can be compared with existing models for adakite

    genesis and, as such, can provide some insight into possible

    magmatic processes occurring in the development of the

    GVC rocks. It is likely, based upon the data examined in

    this study, that partial melting of the subducting Juan de

    Fuca Plate played an important role in the generation of

    GVC magmas. An adakite signature is ubiquitous across

    GVC rocks (Sr>750 ppm, Yb

  • 8/13/2019 Fillmore

    20/23

    adakitic chemistry (Sr/Y and La/Yb) can be obtained via

    AFC and/or partial melting, these processes are likely not

    the dominant ones occurring in the GVC. Average thickness

    of continental crust in the GVC is approximately 35 km

    (Perry et al. 2002); typically this is too thin for garnet to be

    stable at the base of the crust and, therefore, a control on

    HREE contents (e.g., Stern and Kilian 1996). However,

    Garrido et al. (2006) have suggested that restitic garnetmay occur in the roots of island arcs at these depths in

    response to dehydration melting of amphibole-bearing plu-

    tonic rocks. Schiano et al. (2010) used trace element model-

    ling on a database of 700 rocks from the Ecuadorian Andes

    to illustrate that mixing was the major control on their

    evolution. By plotting the ratios of compatible and incom-

    patible elements, fractional crystallization, partial melting,

    and mixing processes can be distinguished from each other

    (Allgre and Minster1978; Schiano et al.2010). By plotting

    an incompatible element versus the ratio of that incompati-

    ble element and a compatible element (e.g., Rb versus

    Rb/V), mixing and fractional crystallization will form acurved trend whereas partial melting forms a linear trend

    (Fig. 11a). In the GVC, the Black Tusk and Paul Ridge

    andesites show a clear mixing or fractional crystallization

    process; the Ring Creek and Barrier andesites only show a

    slight curved trend. The limited data from the Columnar

    Peak dacite cannot show a curved versus linear correlation,

    but in the GVC as a whole, illustrates a curved array. To

    isolate mixing from fractional crystallization, a companion

    plot is needed where the incompatible/compatible element

    ratio is plotted against 1/compatible element (1/V versus

    Rb/V, Fig.11b). On this companion diagram, mixing creates

    the linear trend and partial melting and fractional crystalli-

    zation plots as the curve; all the GVC lavas plot as lineartrends. Figure 11 also illustrates that the mixing trends

    reflect magma mixing and not mixing of sources. Partial

    melting of a heterogeneous source would significantly mod-

    ify the incompatible/compatible element ratio, whereas ra-

    tios of incompatible elements only would not be affected

    (Langmuir et al. 1978; Schiano et al. 2010). This suggests

    that the mixing relations observed in the GVC occurred in

    the magma chamber (or chambers) beneath each center after

    separation from their solid source and argues against signif-

    icant fractional crystallization processes controlling the

    chemistry of the GVC adakites.

    Conclusions

    Petrographic and geochemical examination of the interme-

    diate rocks erupted at some of the centers that comprise the

    Fig. 11 Incompatible/

    compatible element ratio plots

    for:aRb versus Rb/Vandb1/V

    versus Rb/V distinguishing

    mixing from both partial

    melting and fractional

    crystallization processes. Inset

    schematics are modified after

    Schiano et al. (2010). In plota,

    a curved trend is generated by

    either mixing or fractional

    crystallization where a linear

    trend is indicative of partial

    melting. To isolate the mixing

    relationship, a companion plot

    must be used in tandem. The

    linear trend in plotb illustrates

    the dominance of mixing in the

    GVC rocks and not fractional

    crystallization (or partial

    melting). Symbolsas in Fig. 4

    730, Page 20 of 23 Bull Volcanol (2013) 75:730

  • 8/13/2019 Fillmore

    21/23

    GVC illustrate that the andesites and dacites are adakitic in

    character. Volcanic rocks from Paul Ridge, the Ring Creek

    flow, and Columnar Peak in the MGVF were compared with

    rocks from the Black Tusk and the Barrier flow in the GLVF

    as well as previously published data. All the rocks from the

    GVC exhibit Sr/Y>40, low Yb (

  • 8/13/2019 Fillmore

    22/23

    differentiation of island arcs and generation of continental crust. J

    Petrol 47:18731914

    Geochemical Earth Reference Model (GERM) Reservoir Database

    (2013) earthref.org/GERMRD/datamodel/ oceanic crust, N-

    MORB, primitive mantle, dacite, andesite. Accessed: Feb 14, 2013

    Govindaraju K, Potts PJ, Webb PC, Watson JS (1994) Report on Whin

    Sill dolerite WS-E from England and Pitscurrie microgabbro PM-

    S from Scotland: assessment by one hundred and four interna-

    tional laboratories. Geostand Newsl 18:211300. doi:10.1111/

    j.1751-908X.1994.tb00520.xGreen NL (1977) Multistage andesite genesis in the Garibaldi Lake

    area, southwestern British Columbia. University of British

    Columbia, PhD Dissertation, 265p

    Green NL (1981) Geology and petrology of Quaternary volcanic rocks,

    Garibaldi Lake area, southwestern British Columbia. Geol Soc

    Am Bull 92:697702

    Green NL (1990) Late Cenozoic volcanism in the Mount Garibaldi and

    Garibaldi Lake volcanic fields, Garibaldi volcanic belt, south-

    western British Columbia. Geosci Can 17:171174

    Green NL (2006) Influence of slab thermal structure on basalt source

    regions and melting conditions: REE and HFSE constraints from

    the Garibaldi volcanic belt, northern Cascadia subduction system.

    Lithos 87:2349

    Green NL, Henderson P (1984) Rare earth element concentrations in

    Quaternary volcanic rocks of southwestern British Columbia. Can

    J Earth Sci 21:731736

    Green NL, Armstrong RL, Harakal JE, Souther JG, Read PB (1988)

    Eruptive history and K-Ar geochronology of the late Cenozoic

    Garibaldi volcanic belt, southwestern British Columbia. Geol Sci

    Am Bull 100:563579

    Green NL, Harry DL (1999) On the relationship between subducted

    slab age and arc basalt petrogenesis, Cascadia subduction system,

    North America. Earth Planet Sci Lett 171:367381

    Green NL, Sinha AK (2005) Consequences of varied slab age and

    thermal structure on enrichment processes in the sub-arc mantle of

    the northern Cascadia subduction system. J Volcanol Geotherm

    Res 140:107132

    Gutscher MA, Maury RC, Eissen JP, Bourdon E (2000) Can slab

    melting be caused by flat subduction? Geol 28:535538

    Hickson CJ, Russell JK, Stasiuk MV (1999) Volcanology of the 2350

    B.P. eruption of Mount Meager volcanic complex, British

    Columbia, Canada: implications for hazards from eruptions in

    topographically complex terrain. B Volcanol 60:489507

    Huang F, He Y (2010) Partial melting of the dry mafic continental

    crust: implications for petrogenesis of C-type adakites. Chin Sci

    Bull 55:24282439

    Ickert RB, Thorkelson DJ, Marshall DD, Ullrich TD (2009) Eocene

    adakitic volcanism in southern British Columbia: remelting of arc

    basalt above a slab window. Tectonophysics 464:164185

    Kay RW (1978) Aleutian magnesian andesites: melts from subducted

    Pacific Ocean crust. J Volcanol Geotherm Res 4:117132

    Kelley KA, Plank T, Ludden J, Staudigel H (2003) Composition of

    altered oceanic crust at ODP sites 801 and 1149. Geochem

    Geophys Geosyst 4(8910):21pLangmuir CH, Vocke RD Jr, Hanson GN, Hart SR (1978) A general

    mixing equation with applications to Icelandic basalts. Earth

    Planet Sci Lett 37:380392

    Le Bas MJ, Streckeisen AL (1991) The IUGS systematics of igneous

    rocks. J Geol Soc, London 148:825833

    Lyubetskaya T, Korenaga J (2007) Chemical composition of Earths

    primitive mantle and its variance: 2. Implications for global

    geodynamics J Geophys Res 112(B03212):15p

    Macdonald GA (1968) Composition and origin of Hawaiian lavas. In:

    Coats RR, Hay RL, Anderson CA (eds) Studies in volcanology: a

    memoir in honor of Howel Williams, vol 116, Geol Sci Am

    Memoir., pp 477522

    Macpherson CG, Dreher ST, Thirlwall MF (2006) Adakites with-

    out slab melting: high pressure differentiation of island arc

    magma, Mindanao, the Philippines. Earth Planet Sci Lett

    243:581593

    Madsen JK, Thorkelson DJ, Friedman RM, Marshall DD (2006)

    Cenozoic to recent plate configurations in the Pacific basin: ridge

    subduction and slab window magmatism in western North

    America. Geosph 2:1134

    Martin H (1999) The adakitic magmas: modern analogues of Archaean

    granitoids. Lithos 46:411429Martin H, Moyen JF (2003) Secular changes in TTG composition:

    comparison with modern adakite. EGS-AGU-EUG Jt Meet, Nice,

    Apr VGP7-1 FR2O-001

    Martin H, Smithies RH, Rapp R, Moyen JF, Champion D (2005) An

    overview of adakite, tonalite-trondhjemite-granodiorite (TTG),

    and sanukitoid: relationships and some implications for crustal

    evolution. Lithos 79:124

    Mathews WH (1951) The Table, a flat topped volcano in southern

    British Columbia. Am J Sci 249:830841

    Mathews WH (1952) Mount Garibaldi, a supraglacial volcano in

    southwestern British Columbia. Am J Sci 250:81103

    Mathews WH (1958) Geology of the Mount Garibaldi map-area,

    southwestern British Columbia, Canada. Geol Sci Am Bull

    69:161198

    Moyen JF (2009) High Sr/Y and La/Yb ratios: the meaning of the

    adakitic signature. Lithos 112:556574

    Panteeva SV, Gladkochoub DP, Donskaya TV, Markova VV,

    Sandimirova GP (2003) Determination of 24 trace elements in

    felsic rocks by inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry

    after lithium metaborate fusion. Spectrochim Acta Pt B 58:341

    350

    Perry HKC, Eaton DWS, Forte AM (2002) LITH5.0: a revised crustal

    model for Canada based on lithoprobe results. Geophys J Int

    150:285294

    Rapp RP, Shimizu N, Norman MD, Applegate GS (1999)

    Reaction between slab-derived melts and peridotite in the

    mantle wedge: experimental constraints at 3.8 GPa. Chem

    Geol 160:335356

    Richards JP, Kerrich R (2007) Special paper: adakite-like rocks: their

    diverse origins and questionable role in metallogenesis. Econ

    Geol 102:537576

    Riddihough RP (1981) One hundred million years of plate tectonics in

    western Canada. Geosci Can 9:2834

    Riddihough RP (1984) Recent movements of the Juan de Fuca Plate

    system. J Geophys Res 89(B8):69806994

    Schiano P, Clocchiatti R, Shimizu N, Maury RC, Jochum KP, Hofmann

    AW (1995) Hydrous silica-rich melts in the sub-arc mantle and

    their relationship with erupted arc lavas. Nat 377:595600

    Schiano P, Monzier M, Eissen JP, Martin H, Koga KT (2010) Simple

    mixing as the major control of the evolution of volcanic suites in

    the Ecuadorian Andes. Contrib Miner Pet 160:297312

    Sherrod DR, Smith JG (1990) Quaternary extrusion rates of the

    Cascade Range, northwestern United States and southern British

    Columbia. J Geophys Res 95:19465

    19474Sigurdsson H, Houghton B, McNutt SR, Rymer H, Stix J (2000)

    Encyclopedia of volcanoes. Academic Press, California, 1417p

    Sivertz GWG (1976) Geology, petrology and petrogenesis of Opal

    Cone and Ring Creek lava flow, southern Garibaldi, British

    Columbia. B.Sc. Thesis, University of British Columbia 79p

    Stern CR, Kilian R (1996) Role of the subducted slab, mantle wedge

    and continental crust in the generation of adakites from the

    Austral Volcanic Zone. Contrib Miner Pet 123:263281

    Sun SS, McDonough WI (1989) Chemical and isotopic systematics of

    oceanic basalts: implications for mantle composition and process-

    es. In: Saunders AD, Norry MJ (eds) Magmatism in the ocean

    basins. Spec Pub 42, Geol Soc London 313345

    730, Page 22 of 23 Bull Volcanol (2013) 75:730

    http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-908X.1994.tb00520.xhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-908X.1994.tb00520.xhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-908X.1994.tb00520.xhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-908X.1994.tb00520.x
  • 8/13/2019 Fillmore

    23/23

    Tatsumi Y, Hamilton DL, Nesbitt RW (1986) Chemical characteristics

    of fluid phase from the subducted lithosphere: evidence from

    high-pressure experiments and natural rocks. J Volcanol

    Geotherm Res 29:293309

    Thorkelson DJ, Breitsprecher K (2005) Partial melting of slab window

    margins: genesis of adakitic and non-adakitic magmas. Lithos

    79:2541

    Turner JS, Campbell IH (1986) Convection and mixing in magma

    chambers. Earth Sci Rev 23:255352

    Wilson DS (1988) Tectonic history of the Juan de Fuca ridge over thelast 40 million years. J Geophys Res 93:1186311876

    Wilson M (1989) Igneous petrogenesis. HarperCollinsAcademic,

    London, 485p

    Wilson DS (2002) The Juan de Fuca plate and slab: isochron

    structure and Cenozoic plate motions. In: Kirby SH, Wang K,

    Dunlop SG (Eds) The Cascadia subduction zone and related sub-

    duction systems. US Geol Surv Open File Rep 02328: 912

    Xu J, Wang Q, Yu X (2000) Geochemistry of high-Mg andesites and

    adakitic andesite from Sanchazi block of the Mian-Lue ophiolitic

    melange in the Qinling mountains, central China: evidence of

    partial melting of the subducted Paleo-Tethyan crust. Geochem J34:359377

    Bull Volcanol (2013) 75:730 Page 23 of 23, 730


Recommended