+ All Categories
Home > Documents > Filter plane resolution requirements for coherent optical correlators

Filter plane resolution requirements for coherent optical correlators

Date post: 03-Oct-2016
Category:
Upload: alan
View: 213 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend
2
Filter plane resolution requirements for coherent optical correlators David Casasent and Alan Furman Carnegie-Mellon University, Department of Electrical Engineering, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15213. Received 19 July 1976. The joint transform correlator 1 has recently received con- siderable attention because it is compatible with reflex mode readout real-time devices. 2 This system and the classic fre- quency plane (or Vander Lugt) correlator 3 have recently been compared. We report here on the fact that the resolution requirements of the transform plane material in the frequency plant correlator (FPC) are always less than or equal to those of the joint transform correlator (JTC). In the FTC, the interference of the Fourier transform of a reference function g (χ) (1-D functions are used only for simplicity) and a plane wave at angle θ is recorded at P 1 . With f(x) present at the input plane P 0 , its transform F(u) formed by lens L 1 is incident on P 1 ; and the output pattern at P 2 formed by L 2 is where * denotes convolution, ® denotes correlation, a = (sinθ)/λ, and fl, is the focal length of L 1 or L 2 . From Eq. (1), the on-axis terms at P 2 have width 2 W g + W f , where W g and W f are the widths of g(x) and f(x). The terms at χ = ±aλfL have width W f + W g . For the case of W f = W g = W, sepa- ration of the terms at χ = ±aλfL from the on-axis terms re- quires a ≥ 2.5Wλ fL . When this criterion is followed, the total width of the output correlation plane pattern is 7 W. In the JTC the two functions f(x) and g(x) are placed side-by-side at P 0 with a center-to-center spacing of 2b, and the interference of their overlapping transforms (formed by L 1 ) is recorded at P 1 . When P 1 is subsequently illuminated with a plane wave, the Fourier transform of its transmittance formed by L 2 at P 2 is From Eq. (2) we see that the width of the on-axis term is now 2W g or 2W f or 2W for W g = W f , and the width of the corre- lation terms at χ ±26 is W g + W f = 2W for W g = W f . To separate these terms, we require b ≥ W, from which the maximum spatial frequency recorded at P 1 must be 2Wλfz, and the total width of the pattern in the correlation plane is 6W. If one assumes that the bandwidth required in the Fourier transform plane is proportional to the width of the pattern in the correlation plane, 2 then the resolution required at P 1 in the FPC appears to be higher than in the JTC. However this is not true. The difference is due to the fact that P 1 in the JTC is illuminated by a plane wave, and the correlation pat- tern is thus the impulse response of the filter at P 1 . Hence the total width of the correlation pattern reflects the resolu- tion required at P 1 . However, P 1 in the FPC is illuminated by the transform F(u) of a function f(x) of width W rather than a plane wave. The pattern recorded at P 1 in the FPC is equivalent to the joint transform of a delta function and g(x) with a center-to-center spacing of 2.5W. The impulse re- sponse for the filter recorded at P 1 consists of an on-axis term of width 2W and first-order terms of width W separated from the on-axis terms by W, for a total width of 6W for the impulse response. Since the widths of the impulse responses of the recordings at P 1 are the same for both systems, the resolutions February 1977 / Vol. 16, No. 2 / APPLIED OPTICS 285
Transcript
Page 1: Filter plane resolution requirements for coherent optical correlators

Filter plane resolution requirements for coherent optical correlators

David Casasent and Alan Furman Carnegie-Mellon University, Department of Electrical Engineering, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15213. Received 19 July 1976. The joint transform correlator1 has recently received con­

siderable attention because it is compatible with reflex mode readout real-time devices.2 This system and the classic fre­quency plane (or Vander Lugt) correlator3 have recently been compared. We report here on the fact that the resolution requirements of the transform plane material in the frequency plant correlator (FPC) are always less than or equal to those of the joint transform correlator (JTC).

In the FTC, the interference of the Fourier transform of a reference function g (χ) (1-D functions are used only for simplicity) and a plane wave at angle θ is recorded at P1. With f(x) present at the input plane P0, its transform F(u) formed by lens L1 is incident on P1; and the output pattern at P2 formed by L2 is

where * denotes convolution, ® denotes correlation, a = (sinθ)/λ, and fl, is the focal length of L1 or L2. From Eq. (1), the on-axis terms at P2 have width 2Wg + Wf, where Wg and Wf are the widths of g(x) and f(x). The terms at χ = ±aλfL have width Wf + Wg. For the case of Wf = Wg = W, sepa­ration of the terms at χ = ±aλfL from the on-axis terms re­quires a ≥ 2.5WλfL. When this criterion is followed, the total width of the output correlation plane pattern is 7 W.

In the JTC the two functions f(x) and g(x) are placed side-by-side at P0 with a center-to-center spacing of 2b, and the interference of their overlapping transforms (formed by L1) is recorded at P1. When P1 is subsequently illuminated with a plane wave, the Fourier transform of its transmittance formed by L2 at P2 is

From Eq. (2) we see that the width of the on-axis term is now 2Wg or 2Wf or 2W for Wg = Wf, and the width of the corre­lation terms at χ ±26 is Wg + Wf = 2W for Wg = Wf. To separate these terms, we require b ≥ W, from which the maximum spatial frequency recorded at P1 must be 2Wλfz, and the total width of the pattern in the correlation plane is 6W.

If one assumes that the bandwidth required in the Fourier transform plane is proportional to the width of the pattern in the correlation plane,2 then the resolution required at P1 in the FPC appears to be higher than in the JTC. However this is not true. The difference is due to the fact that P1 in the JTC is illuminated by a plane wave, and the correlation pat­tern is thus the impulse response of the filter at P1. Hence the total width of the correlation pattern reflects the resolu­tion required at P1. However, P1 in the FPC is illuminated by the transform F(u) of a function f(x) of width W rather than a plane wave. The pattern recorded at P1 in the FPC is equivalent to the joint transform of a delta function and g(x) with a center-to-center spacing of 2.5W. The impulse re­sponse for the filter recorded at P1 consists of an on-axis term of width 2W and first-order terms of width W separated from the on-axis terms by W, for a total width of 6W for the impulse response. Since the widths of the impulse responses of the recordings at P1 are the same for both systems, the resolutions

February 1977 / Vol. 16, No. 2 / APPLIED OPTICS 285

Page 2: Filter plane resolution requirements for coherent optical correlators

Fig. 1. Correlation plane patterns for JTC and FPC and impulse re­

sponse of the matched filter in FPC.

required at P1 is the same for both the JTC and FPC if Wf =

If Wf » Wg, 0, the total width of the correlation plane pattern at P 2 is 4W for the JTC and 3W for the FPC, from which we find a ≥ W/λfL. The pattern formed at P1 in the FPC is equivalent to the joint transform of a delta function and impulse function g(x) separated by W. The impulse response of this P1 record is only 2W wide, compared with AW for the JTC. Thus, the resolution requirements at P1 for the FPC are half those needed in the JTC for the case of Wf »

For the case of Wf « Wg the widths of the correlation plane patterns, the impulse responses of the patterns recorded at P 1 , and thus the resolution required at P1 are the same for both correlations. Thus in all cases, the resolution require­ments for the material used at P1 in the FPC are less than or equal to those for the JTC and never larger, as previously re­ported.2 The correlation plane patterns for the JTC and FPC and the impulse response of the matched filter in the FPC are shown in Fig. 1 for the three cases considered.

This work has been supported by the Air Force Office of Scientific Research, Air Force Systems Command USAF under Grant AFOSR-75-2851.

References 1. C. S. Weaver and J. W. Goodman, Appl. Opt. 5, 1248 (1966). 2. P. Nisenson and R. Sprague, Appl. Opt. 14, 2602 (1975). 3. A. Vander Lugt, IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory IT-10,139 (1964).

286 APPLIED OPTICS / Vol. 16, No. 2 / February 1977


Recommended