Final Lgpms

e-SLGPRState of Local Governance Performance, Electronic Report

State of Local Governance Performance Report

determines how the fundamentals of good

governance such as Participation,

Transparency and Accountability are valued

in the LGU. It is assessed based on key areas of governance.


(1)Administrative Governance,(2) Social Governance,

(3)Economic Governance, and(4)Environmental Governance.

(5) Valuing Fundamentals of Good Governance

Five (5) Areas of Governance


Administrative Governance

Local Legislation, Development Planning, Revenue Generation, Resource Allocation and Utilization, Customer Service, and Human Resource Management

and Development

Six Areas


Administrative Governance


Area(s) with Excellent

Performance

Performance

DescriptionInterpretation

Customer Service - CivilApplications

5 - HIgh Seamless delivery and ease ofobtaining frontline services areprincipal in civil registry and realproperty documents.

Human Resource Management and

Development

5 - HIgh Managing the human resource isgeared towards a desired endwhich is "desirable organizationalperformance and productivity".

Priority Area for

Improvement

Performance

Description

Interpretation

Resource Allocation and Utilization3.83

Fair

Management and coordination processes for budgeting and

accounting are in place. However, these processes need to

be revisited and improved. They are guarantees to an

effective allocation and optimum utilization of financial

resources.

Local Legislation4.20

High but not Excellent

The imperatives of quality legislation have to be looked

into. This might mean looking into legislative staff

competence and the greater use of legislative tools such

agenda development, legislative tracking, backstopping

committee and legislative performance.


Priority Area for

Improvement

Performance

Description

Interpretation

Revenue Generation4.67


Existing measures in support of revenue generation need to be

enhanced. This is an initial yet essential step in maximizing revenue

generation potentials.

Development Planning4.91


Improvements in the following areas are underscored: (a)

organizational performance; (b) consultation process; and (c)

management of planning database. These areas are instrumental in

quality land use and development planning, or lack of it.



Social Governance



Performance

Performance


Peace, Security and Disaster Risk Management 5 - High

Appropriate structure and plan for community and child protection

are established. Funding and other essential support for protective

services and the Katarungang Pambarangay are ensured. Crime

incidence is reduced, and most if not all interpersonal disputes are

immediately and amicably settled. The Local Disaster Coordinating

Council is functional - which is a measure of disaster-

preparedness.There is a high level of readiness to respond to, or

manage, the risks attendant in a disaster or calamity - including relief

and rehabilitation.

Support to Housing and Basic Utilities5 - High

An administrative mechanism dedicated to addressing the multiple

requirements of housing services is in place. Mass housing project

and donation of lots for socialized housing are twin-response to the

housing backlog.



Performance

Performance


Support to Housing and Basic Utilities5 - High

An administrative mechanism dedicated to addressing the

multiple requirements of housing services is in place. Mass

housing project and donation of lots for socialized housing

are twin-response to the housing backlog.

Support to Education Services5 - High

Truly effective support to basic education. The LSB is

functional. Principally, the SEF is used where it should be

utilized in the first place - school facilities, educational

research, additional classrooms and teachers, scholarship

program. Supplementary allocation from the General Fund

is an added value in favor of the education sector.

Priority Area for

Improvement

Performance

Description

Interpretation

Health Services4.97


The overall quality of the local health system deserves a second look.

This is so because performance falls short in certain aspects. The

principal support system on this matter is the Local Health Board. It

might have to do more.



Economic Governance



Performance

Performance


None of the 2 areas in EconomicGovernance marked "excellentperformance" so far. Meantime,dedicate more time and effort onthe areas for improvement.

Priority Area for

Improvement

Performance

Description

Interpretation

Entrepreneurship, Business and

Industry Promotion

4.50


More need to be done to institutionalize a business-friendly environment.

Support to Agriculture Sector4.67


Local government support is extended to the Agriculture

Sector. But greater intervention is necessary.



Environmental Governance



Performance

Performance


Freshwater Ecosystems Management 5 - high

Freshwater ecosystem management is of

importance to the LGU. Long-term planning is

valued. CSO and citizen participation are

recognized and are mobilized in fresh water

protection and rehabilitation. Areas for

rehabilitation and protection are set, and that target

areas for rehabilitation and protection are met.

Priority Area for

Improvement

Performance

Description

Interpretation

Urban Ecosystems Management 4.00


Pollution control and proper solid waste management are

essential in preserving the integrity of the environment.

More need to be done. To gain better performance in this

area, consider the following:



Valuing Fundamentals of Governance



Performance

Performance


Transparency 5 - high

Transparency in governmental operations is remarkable.

Communicating to the public through various means, i.e., Bulletin

Board, Public Information Office or Desk, print, broadcast media,

website, and forum, is valued.

Participation 5 - high

Engaging the citizens and CSOs in local governance has achieved an

admirable level of maturity. Proofs to this are CSO participation in

decision-making through the Local Special Bodies, CSO

involvement in local development projects and Citizens Feedback.


Priority Area for

Improvement

Performance

Description

Interpretation

Financial Accountability4.92


Efforts to improve financial accountability are

acknowledged. However, administrative capacity to ensure

observance of guidelines relative to accounting, internal

control, procurement and financial transactions need to be

strengthened.

e-SLDRState of Local Development, Electronic Report

e-SLDR is an approximation of the state of

socio-economic and environmental

development in a locality. The result is

based on LGU self-assessment or

estimates of key development indicators.

National target, average and expert

inference are used as benchmarks.


(1)Social Development(2) Economic Development

(3)Environmental Development

Three (3) Areas of Development


Social Development (4.62)

Social development is determined using quality of life and

minimum basic needs indicators, such as:

a. Health and Nutrition,

b. Education,

c. Housing and Basic Needs, and

d. Peace and Security

It is affected by both the state of the economy and environmental

quality.


Social Development 4.62 (High)


Description on Social Development

1.State of Health and Nutrition

Indicator Interpretation GuidePercentage (%) of childrenbelow normal weights.

Condition: Children nutrition, in general, is assured.

MTPDP 2010 Target is

exceptionally met. Sustain! Zero incidence of

malnutrition is ideal but desirable

LGU Data: 10 % or below

Benchmark: should not exceed 25%

Reference: MTPDP 2010 Target - 21.6%; 2005

National Average - 24.6%

:


Detailed Description on Social Development


Morbidity Rate Condition: Morbidity rates for the identified leading illnesses, in general, arewithin acceptable conditions. The challenge is, at the very least, to keep therates lower (if zero prevalence is not attainable) than the national targets.LGU Data: Collated morbidity rate for specific illnesses, i.e., Tuberculosis, HIV,Malaria, Heart diseases, Diarrhea, Dengue, is between the index of 3 - 3.99Benchmark: should not be lower than the 2010 Target (specific targets arecontained in the Data Capture Form)Reference: MTPDP and National Objectives for Health




Crude death rate Condition: Crude death rate is low. Local situation is better than the national.The lower the rate, the better.LGU Data: 2 - 3 per 1, 000 populationBenchmark: 4 - 5 per 1,000 populationReference: National Ave. - 4.8 per 1,000 population based on 2000 Census

Maternal mortality rate Condition: Maternal mortality is not an issue. The situation is far better than thenational situation. Sustain programs that ensure maternal and child care.LGU Data: 0.3 or below per 1,000 live birthsBenchmark: 0.7 - 0.9 per 1,000 live birthsReference: MTPDP 2010 Target - 0.9 (converted from 100,000 to 1,000 livebirths)



1.State of Health and NutritionInfant mortality rate Condition: Infant mortality is currently not a problem. Local condition is far

better than the national.LGU Data: 0 -5 per 1,000 live birthsBenchmark: 15-17 per 1,000 live birthsReference: MTPDP 2010 Target - 17 per 1,000 live births. 2003 National Ave -29 per 1,000 live births (Source: 2003 National Demographic and HealthSurvey)

Children mortality

rate (under 5

yrs. old)

Condition: Children mortality rate in the LGU is far better than the nationalsituation. Sustain programs that ensure child care.LGU Data: 10 or below per 1,000 live birthsBenchmark: 30 - 33 per 1,000 live birthsReference: MTPDP 2010 Target - 32.24 per 1,000 live births . 2003 NationalAve. - 40 per 1,000 live births


State of Education

Indicator Interpretation Guide

Elementary Participation Rate

Condition: Elementary participation rate is very high. Rate is definitely higherthan the 2010 Target. Access to primary education is assured.LGU Data: 98 % or aboveBenchmark: 92 - 94%Reference: MTPDP 2010 Target - 93%

Elementary Completion Rate

Condition: Elementary completion rate is very high. Sustaining primaryeducation is of importance.LGU Data: 96 % and aboveBenchmark: 78 - 88%Reference: MTPDP 2010 Target - 78%


State of Education

Secondary Completion

Rate

Condition: Secondary completion rate is very high. Secondary educationappears to be well supported.LGU Data: 96 % or aboveBenchmark: 71 - 84%Reference: MTPDP 2010 Target - 71.5%

Tertiary or Technical

Education Completion

Rate

Condition: Tertiary or Technical Education Completion Rate is low. Quality ofhuman capital is an issue.LGU Data: 25 - 50%Benchmark: 50-75%Reference: Target estimate

Simple Literacy Rate

Condition: Simple literacy rate is very high.LGU Data: 98 % or aboveBenchmark: 92-94%Reference: National Ave. - 92.8, 2000 Census


State of Housing and Basic Utilities


% of non-owner households

Condition: Extent of house & lot ownership is high.LGU Data: 11 -24 %Benchmark: 25 - 34%Reference: National Ave. - 33.5% (Source: NSO, 2002 Poverty IndicatorSurvey, Preliminary Result)

% of squatter or informal

dwellers

Condition: The size of the informal dweller-population is negligible.LGU Data: 5 % or belowBenchmark: Should be lower than 21%Reference: Target estimate



Percentage (%) of

households with makeshift

houses.

Condition: Households with makeshift houses exist in the area. But themagnitude is lower than the national situation.LGU Data: 2 % or below but not 0Benchmark: This condition should not exist.Reference: 2000 National Ave . - 2.04% (Source: PIDS)

% of households with

access to piped-in water

(level III)

supply for LGUs outside

Metro and non-HUCs

Condition: Majority of the HHs have easy access to water supply (piped-in).That situation is far better than most of the LGUs outside Metro Manila andHUCs.LGU Data: above 70 %Benchmark: should be greater than 35% for LGUs outside Metro Manila andnon-HUCsReference: 2001 National Ave. for both urban and rural areas - 34.3% (Source:National Objective for Health, DOH)



% of households with sanitary

toilet facility for LGUs outside

Metro and non-HUCs.

Condition: The situation is far better than the target for rural areas or thebenchmark for LGUs outside of Metro Manila and HUCs. Water pollution due todomestic wastes and its effect to public health is not an issue.LGU Data: 97 - 100 %Benchmark: should be at least 86% for LGUs outside Metro Manila andnon-HUCsReference: 2010 Target - 86% for rural areas (Source: National Objective forHealth, DOH)

% of households with

electricity for LGUs outside

Metro and non-HUCs.

Condition: The situation is far better than the 2002 national average for ruralareas or the benchmark for LGUs outside of Metro Manila and HUCs.LGU Data: 91 -100 %Benchmark: should be higher than 78% for LGUs outside Metro Manila andnon-HUCsReference: 2002 National Ave. - 79% for rural areas (Source: NSO, PovertyIndicator Survey)


State of Peace and Order


Incidence of index crime

Condition: Incidence of index crime such as murder, homicide, physical injury,rape,robbery and theft is very low.LGU Data: less than 1 per 10,000 populationBenchmark: 5 - 6 per 10,000 populationReference: 2005 National Ave. - 5.26 per 10,000 population (Source: NSCB.Adjusted from 100,000 to 10,000 population)


State of Peace and Order

Incidence of non-index crime

Condition: Incidence of non-index crime such as crimes against nationalsecurity, fundamental laws of the state, public order, public morals, violations ofspecial laws, illegal gambling, illegal possession of firearms, carnapping, illegaldrugs, kidnapping, serious illegal detention, and smuggling is very low.LGU Data: less than 1 per 10,000 populationBenchmark: 3 - 4 per 10,000 populationReference: 2005 National Ave. - 3.84 per 10,000 population (Source: NSCB.Adjusted from 100,000 to 10,000 population)


Economic Development (3.50)

Economic development is determined by indicators of

employment and income. Economic activities have the capacity to

greatly affect the quality of the environment. Well-managed

economic growth does not pollute the environment and does not

destructively exploit and irreversibly damage natural resources.


Economic Development 3.50 (Fair)


Description on Economic Development

1.State of Employment

Indicator Interpretation GuideUnemployment rate.

Underemployment rate

Condition: Unemployment rate is within acceptable level.LGU Data: 6 -7 %Benchmark: should not be higher than 7%Reference: National Ave. - 6.3% (Source: October 2007 Survey, NSO)

Condition: Underemployment rate is highLGU Data: 21 - 30%Benchmark: should not be higher than 20%Reference: National Ave. - 18.1% (Source: October 2007 Survey, NSO

:


Description on Economic Development

1.State of Income

Indicator Interpretation GuideIncome Per Capita

Poverty Incidence for LGUsoutside Metro Manila andnon-HUCs.

Condition: Income per capita is a little higher than the calculated nationalaverage.LGU Data: 36, 000 - 50,000 per yearBenchmark: should not be lower than PhP 35,000 per yearReference: Calculated National Ave. - PhP34,600 (Source: 2006 data, NSO)Condition: Poverty incidence is low.LGU Data: below 10 %Benchmark: 26 - 35 %Reference: National Ave. - 26.9% (2006 Poverty Statistics, NSCB)

:


Environmental Development (3.00)

Environmental development is determined using environmental

quality indicators such as the land, air and water quality and

natural resources indicators describing agricultural, forest and

aquatic resources productivity. The result depends on the type of

ecosystem in the LGU.


Environmental Development 3.00 (Fair)


Description on Environmental Development

1.State of Urban Ecosystems

Indicator Interpretation Guide% of tree cover in urban areas(cities and town centers)

% of polluting industries.

Condition: Tree cover in urban areas falls short with the

desirable condition. Air

quality is at stake

LGU Data: less than 10%

Benchmark: should be at least 20%

Reference: Local Development Watch Manual

Condition: No polluting industries. Better air quality in urban

areas is expected.

LGU Data: All industries have pollution control facilities.

Benchmark: All industries should have pollution control

facilities

Reference: Local Development Watch Manual (as indicated

by an environment specialist)

1.State of Urban Ecosystems


Absence of smog, odor andnoise in urban areas (citiesand town centers).

Presence of solid waste heapson roadsides and vacant lotsand in urban lands (cities andtown centers).

Condition: Air quality is uncomfortable.LGU Data: Few cases of smog, occasional odor and slightly disturbing noiselevelBenchmark: Absence of smog, odor and noise in cities or town centersReference: Local Development Watch Manual (as indicated by an environmentspecialist)

Condition: Sanitation in the urban land area is somewhat an issue.LGU Data: Presence of solid waste heaps are observed in some spots andsites along roadsides and vacant lotsBenchmark: This situation should not occurReference: Local Development Watch Manual

Indicator Interpretation Guide% of irrigated land to totalirrigable lands.

% of prime lands converted tonon-agricultural uses for CCsand 1st - 3rd classmunicipalities.

Crop yield.

Condition: Maximum effort on agricultural land development and very highpossibility to increase agricultural land productivity.LGU Data: 81- 100 %Benchmark: 40-50%Reference: National Ave. - 46% (Source: Status of Irrigation Development, NIA,December, 2006)

Condition: Prime agricultural land is sustained.LGU Data: 10 % or belowBenchmark: should not be higher than 10%Reference: Section 20, LGC of 1991

Condition: Crop production indicates average agricultural land productivity.LGU Data: 3 - 3.99Benchmark: An index of 3, meaning the average yield for top 3 crops reachedthe national average for crop production. ( see Data Capture Form as reference)Reference: Crop Statistics of the Philippines, Bureau of Agricultural Statistics,Department of Agriculture, August 2007

2. State of Agricultural Ecosystems

3. State of Freshwater Ecosystems

Indicator Interpretation GuideFish catch in river or lake.

Presence of pollutingindustries in riverside orlakeside.

Condition: Fish catch in river or lake has decreased over the past five yearsLGU Data: Fish catch in river or lake is decreasingBenchmark: Should be stable or increasingReference: Local Development Watch

Condition: Presence of polluting industries in riverside or lakeside.LGU Data: 1 or more industries have no pollution control facilitiesBenchmark: All industries should have pollution control facilitiesReference: Local Development Watch

Indicator Interpretation GuideFreshwater quality.

Extent of riverside or lakesidesquatters.

Condition: Freshwater quality is poor.LGU Data: Water is turbid (light brown to brown color) with some floatingwastesBenchmark: Water should be clear, without water lilies and/or floating wastesReference: Local Development Watch

Condition: Many squatter households are observed on riverside or lakeside.Itâ€™s a social and environment issue.LGU Data: 21 - 100 houses per km stretch on riverside or lakesideBenchmark: Should not be more than 20Reference: Local Development Watch

Financial Performance, Electronic Report

This Report provides a practical tool to gauge Cabuyaofinancial performance as compared to financialperformance of all LGUs within the same LGU type andincome class..

Two Parts:(1) Revenue Generation, and

(2) Resource Allocation and Utilization.


Revenue Generation

Exceptional performance:

Lower for both conditions: (1)average of LGUs with the same LGU type and income

class, (2)national average of the same LGU type regardless of income class

Desired performance:

Should be lower than the average of LGUs with the same LGU type and income class


Revenue Generation


Locally-sourced revenues to total income is higher than the: (1)average of LGUs with the

same LGU type and income class, (2)national average of the same LGU type regardless

of income class


Locally-sourced revenues to total income should be higher than the average of LGUs

with the same LGU type and income class


Revenue Generation


It is higher than the: (1)average of LGUs with the same LGU type and income class, (2)

national average of the same LGU type regardless of income class


Should be higher than the average of LGUs with the same LGU type and income class


Revenue Generation







Revenue Generation







Revenue Generation


It is lower than the: (1)average of LGUs with the same LGU type and income class, (2)





Resource Allocation and Utilization


Met these three conditions: (1) lower than the average of LGUs with the same LGU type and

income class, (2) lower than national average of LGUs with the same LGU type regardless of

income class, (3) Did not exceed the 45-55 ceiling for P.S.


Determines the biases of the local government unit in terms of budget allocation LGU type and

income class. Should not exceed with the ceiling as mandated by law, i.e., for 1st - 3rd class LGUs

- 45%, for 4th - 6th class LGUS - 55%.




It is higher than the: (1)average of LGUs with the same LGU type and income class, (2)national

average of the same LGU type regardless of income class






Should not exceed 20% of the regular income. That is the debt servicing limitation set for

under LG Code of 1991.

Wheel ChartSTATE OF LOCAL DEVELOPMENT

DEVELOPMENTINDEX

Cab

uy

ao

e-SLDR

CORE DEVELOPMENT CHALLENGES

STATE OF LOCAL DEVELOPMENT

Cab

uy

ao

State of Education - Tertiary or Technical Education

completion rate is low . Quality of Human

capital is an issue.

State of Employment -Underemployment rate is high

State of Employment - Underemployment rate is highState of Employment - Underemployment rate is high

e-SLDR

State of Urban Ecosystems - Tree cover in urban areas falls short

with the desirable condition. Air quality is at stake; Air

quality is uncomfortable.

State of Freshwater Ecosystems - Fish catch in river or lake has

decreased over the past five years ; Presence of polluting

industries in riverside or lakeside. ; Freshwater quality is

poor. ; Many squatter households are observed on

riverside or lakeside. It’s a social and environment issue.

Note: Core Development Challenges are those development

indicators where the LGU failed to achieve the minimum or

acceptable condition, and got an equivalent development

index of "2" or "1"


Cab

uy

ao

e-SLDR

SOCIO-ECONOMIC AND ENVIRONMENTAL

INTERDEPENDENCIES

1

2

3

5

The plot helps to determine which sector needs special attention, or which needs to be sustained.


Green line - Ideal level of development

(DI: 5)

Red line - Danger Zone (DI: 3)

Blue line - LGU development index

Cab

uy

ao

e-SLDRSTATE OF LOCAL DEVELOPMENT


INTERDEPENDENCIES

Socio-economic and environment are inter-dependent. A healthy and good

quality human resource (labor force) is a productive working force that

breeds a healthy economy and one that recognizes the value of

environmental quality. A well-managed economy sustains the productivity of

natural endowments and the life support system needed to build a health

society. Well-conserved natural resources provide communities with a

sustainable source of livelihood and income and thus improve their

economic welfare. Clean environment and good economy ensure the quality

of life.

Cab

uy

ao



INTERDEPENDENCIES

In brief, recognizing these interdependencies is about

understanding human life.

Every action or inaction corresponds to great benefits or serious

problems in the future.

The future of next generation lies in our hands.

.

It is, therefore, important that these three sectors are equally

given importance to achieve a balanced and sustained

development.

Cab

uy

ao


There's no option but to

ACT... now.

Cab

uy

ao


Cab

uy

ao

Date post:	14-Jul-2015
Category:	News & Politics
Upload:	archel-francisco
View:	138 times
Download:	0 times

Final Lgpms

News & Politics