+ All Categories
Home > Documents > Final Pepsi

Final Pepsi

Date post: 05-Apr-2018
Category:
Upload: amit-mallik
View: 227 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend

of 14

Transcript
  • 7/31/2019 Final Pepsi

    1/14

    Page | 1

    [Chapter # One]

    [Introduction Part]

  • 7/31/2019 Final Pepsi

    2/14

    Page | 2

    1.0INTRODUCTION

    Globalization has been the battle cry of the last decennium of the 20th century. This phenomenon

    is not new or unique to this period. The process has only been given an added impetus by thepolitical, technological and economic developments that have been unique to the last ten years of

    the century. The demise of communism, the ICT revolution, the liberalization of trade are only

    few of the driving forces of this latest round of intensified globalization. The effect that this

    globalization has had on brands has been spectacular. New brands are seemingly born global, or

    at the very least experience a quick rollout from home or lead countries into other markets. Many

    traditionally local brands are sold, fazed-out or face transition to a new regional or global brand

    name and subsequent harmonization. Brand portfolios, which have been built-up through

    decennia of acquisitions, are rationalized in order to focus attention and resources on a limited

    number of strategic brands. Long established brands have enhanced their dominant positions

    across the globe, threatening less marketing-savvy local brands, but also encountering stern

    opposition from local brands that find ways to fight back. Some of the global brands manage to

    become local institutions by filling a local role in the societies where they operate, while others

    dominate their category as global monoliths. Debates have also flared over the supposed

    supremacy of global brands and the inadequacy of (multi-)local brands. This paper argues that

    this viewpoint is incorrect and that the each individual global or international brand has specific

    opportunities and limitations when it comes to standardization or localization. Only a thorough

    understanding of a variety of factors that influence brands in their global and local contexts helps

    determine the best course for them. Therefore, this paper concerns those involved in global and

    local brand management, as well as managers of local brands who often struggle with global

    competition. We introduce four general brand strategies and examine the internal and external

    factors that influence these strategies as a brand extends across multiple societies. The general

    strategies themselves consist of a total of more than 20 strategy subtypes. A discussion of thesestrategy subtypes exceeds the limitations of this paper. Suffice it to say that each requires its own

    particular capabilities and competencies, each has its particular competitive advantages, and each

    offers consumers some distinct appeal. The author is currently writing a study that examines

    these strategy sub-types. The purpose of this paper is to offer a fresh perspective on global brand

    strategy and management without attempting to be exhaustive.

  • 7/31/2019 Final Pepsi

    3/14

    Page | 3

    1.1ORIGIN OF THE REPORT

    This report is originated by Md. Moniruzzaman, Lecturer, Faculty of Business administration,

    Eastern University, the course instructor of Marketing Management, in order to find out theBranding system regarding the Unilever.

    1.2OBJECTIVES OF THE REPORT

    Study or working on any subject must have objective. It may be only one objective or a

    combination of some objectives. My study also have objective. Before submitting the report I

    need to discuss briefly my Broad Objective and related Specific Objectives.

    1.2.1BROAD OBJECTIVE:

    The main objective of this report is to know The Global Brand of Pepsi Cola A Case Analysis

    on Global Brand Management. From this report we are able to know the Branding of Pepsi

    Cola and their perception regarding Global Brand Management.

    1.2.2SPECIFIC OBJECTIVES OF THE STUDY ARE AS

  • 7/31/2019 Final Pepsi

    4/14

    Page | 4

    1.3METHODOLOGY

    Information used in this report has been collected from both primary and secondary sources.

    Primary data were collected mainly through the Observation.

    Majority of the information were collected from the secondary sources, For secondary source,

    we use internet, books, publications, reading materials and various circulars and reports

    published by Pepsi Cola.

    1.4LIMITATION

    When I developed this report, then I had to face some problems, which disrupted the fulfillment

    of this report. There were several constrains while preparing this report. There have not to

    sufficient time. I faced a number of problems, which may be termed as the limitations of thestudy. These are as follows:

    I could not spend sufficient time required to make an in-depth study on such an important

    subject because of another course.

    There is no sufficient informative information.

    They did not give us exact information for maintaining their secrecy.

    Sufficient records, publications were not available. The constraints narrowed the scope of

    real analysis.Last but not least lack of time has also limited the scope for the report work.

  • 7/31/2019 Final Pepsi

    5/14

    Page | 5

    2.0ABOUT GLOBAL BRAND

    Global brand management needs to understand how various marketscompare on these issues in order to determine how best to manage thebrand globally. Determining communalities and differences in business

    strategy, brand expression and marketing provides insight into the extentto which the organizations policies and activities regarding the branddiverge, as well as the causes and rationale for divergence. Doing the samefor the situational factors, the brand perception and the brand recognitionprovides an understanding of the extent to which the brand is perceiveddifferently across markets, and what causes these differences. A completeanalysis offers brand management an appreciation of the core elements ofthe brand, as expressed and perceived around the world. This type ofinformation forms the basis for shared strategizing and planning for thebranding process by global, regional and local brand management.Decisions regarding brand extensions, harmonization, rejuvenation, portfoliorationalization, alliances and acquisitions depend on a thorough

    understanding of a brand and its environment.

    [CHAPTER TWO]

    [Project Part]

  • 7/31/2019 Final Pepsi

    6/14

    Page | 6

    2.0ABOUT GLOBAL BRAND

    Globalization has been the battle cry of the last decennium of the 20th century. This phenomenon

    is not new or unique to this period. The process has only been given an added impetus by thepolitical, technological and economic developments that have been unique to the last ten years of

    the century. The demise of communism, the ICT revolution, the liberalization of trade are only

    few of the driving forces of this latest round of intensified globalization. The effect that this

    globalization has had on brands has been spectacular. New brands are seemingly born global, or

    at the very least experience a quick rollout from home or lead countries into other markets. Many

    traditionally local brands are sold, fazed-out or face transition to a new regional or global brand

    name and subsequent harmonization. Brand portfolios, which have been built-up through

    decennia of acquisitions, are rationalized in order to focus attention and resources on a limited

    number of strategic brands. Long established brands have enhanced their dominant positions

    across the globe, threatening less marketing-savvy local brands, but also encountering stern

    opposition from local brands that find ways to fight back. Some of the global brands manage to

    become local institutions by filling a local role in the societies where they operate, while others

    dominate their category as global monoliths. Debates have also flared over the supposed

    supremacy of global brands and the inadequacy of (multi-)local brands. This paper argues that

    this viewpoint is incorrect and that the each individual global or international brand has specific

    opportunities and limitations when it comes to standardization or localization. Only a thorough

    understanding of a variety of factors that influence brands in their global and local contexts helps

    determine the best course for them. Therefore, this paper concerns those involved in global and

    local brand management, as well as managers of local brands who often struggle with global

    competition.

    Global brand management needs to understand how various markets compare on these issues inorder to determine how best to manage the brand globally. Determining communalities and

    differences in business strategy, brand expression and marketing provides insight into the extent

    to which the organizations policies and activities regarding the brand diverge, as well as the

    causes and rationale for divergence. Doing the same for the situational factors, the brand

    perception and the brand recognition provides an understanding of the extent to which the brand

  • 7/31/2019 Final Pepsi

    7/14

    Page | 7

    is perceived differently across markets, and what causes these differences. A complete analysis

    offers brand management an appreciation of the core elements of the brand, as expressed and

    perceived around the world. This type of information forms the basis for shared strategizing and

    planning for the branding process by global, regional and local brand management. Decisions

    regarding brand extensions, harmonization, rejuvenation, portfolio rationalization, alliances and

    acquisitions depend on a thorough understanding of a brand and its environment.

    2.1GENERAL BRAND STRATEGIES

    Brand strategy is aimed at influencingpeoples perception of a brand in such a way that they are

    persuaded to act in a certain manner, e.g. buy and use the products and services offered by the

    brand, purchase these at higher price points, donate to a cause. In addition, most brand strategies

    aim to persuade people to buy, use, and donate again by offering them some form of gratifying

    experience. As branding is typically an activity that is undertaken in a competitive environment,

    the aim is also to persuade people to prefer the brand to competition. A global brand needs to

    provide relevant meaning and experience to people across multiple societies. To do so, the brand

    Strategy needs to be devised that takes account of the brands own capabilities and

    competencies, the strategies of competing brands, and the outlook of consumers (including

    business decision makers) which has been largely formed by experiences in their respectivesocieties. There are four broad brand strategy areas that can be employed.

    (1)Brand Domain.Brand domain specialists are experts in one or more of the brand domain aspects

    (products/services, media, distribution, solutions). A brand domain specialist tries to pre-empt or

    even dictate particular domain developments. This requires an intimate knowledge, not only of

    the technologies shaping the brand domain, but also of pertinent consumer behavior and needs.

    The lifeblood of a brand domain specialist is innovation and creative use of its resources. A

    brand domain specialist is like a cheetah in the Serengeti preying on impala and gazelle. The

    cheetah is a specialist hunter with superior speed to chase, and the claws and teeth to kill these

    animals. The cheetah is also very familiar with the habits of its prey. It finds ways of

    approaching, singling out and capturing its prey. The cheetah is one of the most accomplished of

  • 7/31/2019 Final Pepsi

    8/14

    Page | 8

    hunters within the wild cat species; it catches up to 70% of prey that it hunts.

    (2)Brand Reputation.Brand reputation specialists use or develop specific traits of their brands to support their

    authenticity, credibility or reliability over and above competitors. A brand reputation specialist

    needs to have some kind of history, legacy or mythology. It also needs to be able to narrate these

    in a convincing manner, and be able to live up to the resulting reputation. A brand reputation

    specialist has to have a very good understanding of which stories will convince consumers that

    the brand is in some way superior. A brand reputation specialist is like a horse. It can be pure

    bred, have a certain nobility and bearing, and exhibit qualities that can be traced back to these

    (e.g. grace, speed, temperament, looks). Like a horse, the brand reputation specialist can also

    thrive on association with celebrities.

    (3)Brand Affinity.Brand affinity specialists bond with consumers based on one or more of a range of affinity

    aspects. A brand affinity specialist needs to outperform competition in terms of building

    relationships with consumers. This means that a brand affinity specialist needs to have a distinct

    appeal to consumers, be able to communicate with them affectively, and provide an experience

    that reinforces the bonding process. A brand affinity specialist is like a pet dog. A dog is

    generally considered to be mans best friend, due to its affection, its obedience, its loyalty, the

    status and the protection it provides to its owners. Different kinds of dogs will command a

    different form of affection.

    (4)Brand Recognition.Brand recognition specialists distinguish themselves from competition by raising their profiles

    among consumers. The brand recognition specialist either convinces consumers that it is

    somehow different from competition, as is the case for niche brands, or rises above the melee by

    becoming more well known among consumers than competition. The latter is particularly

    important in categories where brands have few distinguishing features in the minds of

    consumers. In some cases, a brand recognition specialist needs to be able to outspend

  • 7/31/2019 Final Pepsi

    9/14

    Page | 9

    competition to gain unbeatable levels of awareness. In other cases, a brand recognition specialist

    needs to convince a loyal following of consumers that it is unique.

    2.2THE BRAND ENVIRONMENT

    More factors influence a brand than the business strategy and the subsequent efforts of the

    organization and its affiliates to bring about the brand, as described in the previous paragraph. A

    brand operates in an environment consisting of, on the one hand, the elements of the strategic

    planning cycle, and on the other hand, organizational conventions, competitive forces, market

    structures, cultural factors, consumer motivation and media attention: the lenses and filters

    through which consumers perceive and experience the brand. These factors combined constitute

    the brand environment. A brand operates in a space that is defined by its own company or

    organization, its competitors, and the societies where it operates. There are both internal and

    external factors that influence how a brand is finally perceived and experienced by consumers.

    2.2.1INTERNAL ENVIRONMENT/FACTORSFactors that are internal to a brands company or organization can be categorized as being

    strategy-related, performance-related and stemming from the brands past. The strategy-related

    factors are those that derive from the business strategy and the marketing strategy. There is a

    strategy hierarchy, whereby business strategy takes the lead, guiding brand strategy. Brand

    strategy in its turn guides marketing strategy.

    2.2.2EXTERNAL ENVIRONMENT/FACTORS

    External influences upon a brand strategy come mainly from three quarters: competition,

    consumers and media. These external influences will vary between the markets and societies

    where a brand operates. Therefore, these influences need to be determined locally. When a brand

    is introduced into a foreign society, it will encounter particular brand strategies that are being

    practiced by competitive brands. Unless competitors are very complacent, head-on

    confrontations with them are generally not the best way of winning the hearts and minds of

    consumers. It is, therefore, important to determine competitors. Brand strategies and to find ways

    of flanking established competition by choosing an alternative strategy.

  • 7/31/2019 Final Pepsi

    10/14

    Page | 10

    [CHAPTER THREE]

    [Study Part]

  • 7/31/2019 Final Pepsi

    11/14

    Page | 11

    3.0HISTORY OF PEPSI COLA

    In 1893 Caleb Bradham, a young pharmacist from New Bern, North Carolina, begins

    experimenting with many different soft drinks. In 1898, one of Caleb's formulations,

    known as "Brad's Drink" a combination of carbonated water, sugar, vanilla, rare oilsand cola nuts, is renamed "Pepsi-Cola". On August 28, 1898, Pepsi-Cola received its

    first logo. In 1902, he applied for a trademark with the U.S. Patent Office,

    Washington D.C., and formed the first Pepsi-Cola Company. 1905, Pepsi-Cola's first

    bottling franchises were established in Charlotte and Durham, North Carolina. In

    1906, Pepsi gets another logo change, the third in eight years. The modified script logo is

    created with the slogan, "The Original Pure Food Drink". In 1920, Pepsi theme line

    speaks to the consumer with "Drink Pepsi-Cola, it will satisfy you". In 1923,

    P e ps i -C o la C o mp a n y w a s d e c la r ed b a n k r u p t a n d i t s a s s e t s w e r e s o l d t o

    a N o r t h C a ro l i n a c o n c e rn , C r a v e n Ho l d i n g Corporation, for $30,000.

    3.1FORMATION OF PEPSI COLA CORPORATION

    Roy C. Megargel, a Wall Street broker, bought the Pepsi trademark, business and

    goodwill from Craven Holding Corporation for $35,000, forming the Pepsi-Cola Corporation.

    In 1928, after five continuous losing years, Megargel reorganized his company asthe National Pepsi-Cola Company. In 1931, U.S. District Court for Eastern District Virginia

    declared the National Pepsi-Cola Company bankrupt, the second bankruptcy in

    Pepsi-Cola history.

    3.2REFORMULATION OF PEPSI COLAS SYRUP FORMULATION

    The Loft candy company acquired the National Pepsi-Cola Company. Charles G.

    Guth, president of Loft, assumed leadership of Pepsi and commanded thereformulation of Pepsi-Cola syrup formula.1934 was a landmark year for Pepsi-Cola. The

    drink was a hit and to attract even more sales, the company began selling its 12-ounce drink for

    five cents (the same cost as six ounces of competitive colas). The 12-ounce bottle debuted in

    Bal t imore , where i t was an ins tant success . The cos t savings proved

    ir re si st ib le to Depression-worn Americans and sales skyrocket nationally. In 1941,

  • 7/31/2019 Final Pepsi

    12/14

    Page | 12

    The New York Stock Exchange traded Pepsi's stock for the first time. In 1964, Diet Pepsi,

    America's first nati ona l d iet soft drin k, deb uted . Peps i- Col a acq uire d Moun tain

    Dew from the Tip Corporation in 1964.

    3.3FORMATION OF PEPSI COLA INCORPORATION

    In 1965, Expansion outside the soft drink industry began. Frito-Lay of Dallas, Texas, and Pepsi-

    Cola merged, forming PepsiCo, Inc. Pepsi Cola Company operates in beverages

    industry. Pepsi Cola international is well reputed multinational company which is doing its

    business in almost every country of the world. The company is registered in New York stock

    exchange U.S.A. to make a better control over the business the company has given the

    manufacturing rights to different companies. Now these companies are producing the products

    on the behalf of the company by using companys trademark. To maintain theirgoodwill in the

    market the company has a strict policy of granting manufacturing rights. Pepsi Cola have

    standardized products all over the world (e.g. same in size, shape and quality). The

    franchises have to follow all the standards given by the company.

    3.4SETUP OF PEPSI COLA

    The head of f i ce i s s i tua ted in New York (USA) wi th uni t s opera t ing in

    di f f erent r eg ions of the wor ld . These are ca l l ed Bus iness Uni t s and Paki s tan

    i s in MEN APak (Middle E a s t , N o r t h A m e r i c a a n d P a k i s t a n ) . T h e

    h e a d o f f i c e o f MENAPak is s ituated in Dubai (UAE). The local head offices for

    each country are situated in the respective capitals.

    3.5PEPSI COLA MULTAN

    Pepsi Multan was incorporated in 1963 but it started its production in 1967. Allah Nawaz K h a n

    T a r e e n ( R e t . D I G ) g o t l i c e n s e o f 7 - U P . B u t i n 1 9 7 3 , i t b e c a m e P e p s i

    Colafranchise. Now a day MD of Pepsi Cola Multan is Alamgeer Khan Tareen son

    of Allah Nawaz Khan Tareen. At start Pepsi Multan was having only one production plant

    made by Netherlands. and was only producing 7-Up because it was the only brand produced by

    Parent Company. In 1973, PEPSI acqui red 7-Up in Canada so the Mul tan

  • 7/31/2019 Final Pepsi

    13/14

    Page | 13

    franchise started producing PEPSI and Marinda along with 7-Up & became PEPSI franchise.

    Coke was already operating in the market at the time when Pepsi Multan established. At that

    time Coke was market leader but with the passage of time Pepsi Multan kept on

    focusing on gaining the market share. Recently Pepsi has launched a new brand with the name

    of Mounta in Dew. Now Peps i Mul tan i s working wi th f ive product ion p lant s

    capable of producing 100,000 cases per day. Installation arrangements for two new plants are in

    process. The plant which was installed at the time of establishment has now been

    grounded. Pepsi Multan is currently market leader with more than 80% of market share. The

    company is properly serving all these areas with quality products. PEPSI Multan

    i snot an ISO cer t i f i ed company because i t i s an in terna t ional dr ink having

    thei r own standards and there is no export.

    3.6MISSION OF THE COMPANY

    We aspire to make Pepsi Company the worlds premier consumer Products

    Company, focused on convenient beverages. We seek to produce healthy

    financial rewards for investors as we provide opportunities for growth and enrichment to

    our employees, our business partners and the communities in which we operate. And in everything

    we do, we strive to act with honesty, openness, fairness and integrity

    3.7MAJOR COMPETITOR

    Pepsi Cola major competitor is Coca Cola in all over the world,

    About Coca Cola:

    3.7.1 Mission

    Mission of Coca Cola international is From our heritage to our mission to the people

    who bring our products to thirsty consumers, the Coca Cola is a part of lives every

    where. In order to achieve this mission, we must create value for all the constituents. We serve,

    including our consumers, our customers, our bottlers and our communities.

  • 7/31/2019 Final Pepsi

    14/14

    Page | 14

    3.7.2 Objective

    Objective of our bus iness s t r a tegy are to increase volume, expand our share

    worldwide nonalcoholic ready-to-drink beverage sales, maximize our long term cash

    flows and create economic value added by improving economic profit.

    The Coca Cola Company creates value by executing a comprehensive business

    strategy guided by six key beliefs;

    (1)Consumer Demand drives everything we do.(2)Brand Coca Cola is the core of our business(3)

    We wil l serv e consu mers a bro ad selec t ion of th e n onalco hol ic readyto drink beverage they want to drink throughout the day.

    (4)We will be best marketers in the World.(5)We will think globally and act Locally.(6)We will lead as a model corporate citizen


Recommended