53
Chapter-III
WATER AND SANITATION MANAGEMENT – A
CASE STUDY OF GULBARGA CITY
54
CHAPTER - III WATER AND SANITATION MANAGEMENT –
A CASE STUDY OF GULBARGA CITY
3.1 Introduction:
Water supply and sanitation are the basic requirements of life. They are the
main input indicators to the health infrastructure which plays an integral role in
maintaining and promoting health status. Quality of life depends on safe and
adequate quantity of drinking water supply and sanitation facility. There is a wide
linkage of water supply and sanitation facilities with health status and thus on
productivity and income of people.
Sanitation facilities are as important as that of adequate quantity and quality
of drinking water in the maintenance of health and hygiene. Sanitation facilities such
as sewerage system, storm water drain, latrines (public and private) and other
community sanitation services form an integral part in maintaining hygiene and
clean environment. Improved sanitation is considered as an essential requirement for
socio-economic development and critical to health and wellbeing which is an index
of human development. Significant attention is given to sanitation as a major
component of health promotion.
3.2 National Urban Sanitation Policy (NUSP):
The NUSP 2008 envisages “All Indian cities and towns become totally
sanitized, healthy and liveable with a special focus on hygiene and affordable
sanitation facilities for the urban poor and women”. The policy aims to ensure
sustained public health and environmental outcomes for all cities by making them –
55
• Free of open defecation.
• Providing adequate and properly maintained community and public
sanitation facilities especially for the poor.
• Ensuring safe and sanitary disposal of waste.
• Altered mindset.
• Collective behaviour change and health and hygiene practices.
• Reoriented institutions that work collaboratively to achieve and sustain
health and environment benefits.
The overall goal of NUSP is to transform urban India into community driven
totally sanitized, healthy and liveable cities and towns which include
a) Awareness generation and behaviour change
b) Open defecation free cities
c) Integrated town-wide sanitation
d) Sanitary and safe disposal and
e) Proper operation and maintenance of all sanitary installations
3.3 Water and Sanitation in Karnataka:
Considering the significance of safe water supply and sanitation in the
maintenance and promotion of health hygiene, both the central and state governments
have taken major steps to create provisions for these basic services in both rural and
urban areas in Karnataka. The rural development and Panchayat Raj Department has
the responsibility of providing water supply and sanitation services. The rural
programmes are being implemented and maintained by the Rural Panchayat Raj
Institutions – Zilla Panchayat, Taluka Panchayat and Gram Panchayat. In urban areas
the responsibility of water supply and sanitation lies with the Karnataka Urban Water
Supply and Drainage Board (KUWSDB) along with the Urban Local Bodies (ULBs).
56
3.4 Karnataka Urban Drinking Water and Sanitation Policy 2002:
Increasing urbanisation has resulted in greater pressure on the existing urban
water supply and sanitation systems leading to increasing demand on the one hand to
augment the source and improve distribution and on the other to increase the
coverage of Underground Drainage (UGD). At the same time there is an urgent need
to conserve the limited water resources of the state to ensure sufficient availability of
water for various needs as well as for the future. The Government of Karnataka in
partnership with urban local bodies in the state, the Karnataka Urban Water Supply
and Drainage Board (KUWS and DB) and the Bangalore Water Supply and
Sewerage Board (BWSSB) will continue and strengthen its efforts to provide all
residents of urban areas of the state, piped water supply and sanitation services at or
near their dwellings. The efforts of the Government of Karnataka and its partner
agencies will be to
1. Ensure universal coverage of water and sanitation services that people want
and are willing to pay for and
2. To do so in a manner that preserves the sustainability of the precious water
resources of the state, project and enhance the commercial and economical
sustainability of the operations at the same time.
3. Ensure minimum level of service to all citizens.
3.5 Integrated Low Cost Sanitation:
The Integrated Low Cost Sanitation (ILCS) programme envisages
construction of new sanitary latrines in households not having latrines by adopting
the low cost leach pit system, with an objective to eliminate dry latrines and manual
scavenging. The scheme is being implemented with 63 percent HUDCO loan,
32 percent Government of India subsidy and 5 percent of contribution of
57
beneficiary. Initially during the year 1992 the ILCS was taken up in
34 municipalities, subsequently extended the program covering all the urban local
bodies in a phased program.
Objectives of ILCS:
The objectives of Integrated Low Cost Sanitation programme are;
• To stop proliferation of dry toilets and open defecation.
• To remove the dehumanizing practice of manual scavenging.
• To provide better sanitation facilities to the people of all municipalities in the
state.
• To motivate people of latrine less areas to come forward and build toilets.
• To increase healthy practice of maintaining sanitation.
3.6 Water Supply and Sanitation in Karnataka – Current Status:
Water supply and sanitation programmes have been successful in covering
over 84 percent of households with safe drinking water supply. However, in the
sanitation front the achievement is still insignificant as just around 38 percent of the
households have latrine facility while many other community based sanitation
services are absent. The discussion in this part of the study is focussed on the current
status of water supply and sanitation services. They are explained in terms of
• Service providers
• Drinking water supply and sanitation
• Government initiatives on water supply and sanitation and
• Expenditure on water supply and sanitation in the state
3.7 Water Supply and Sanitation Service Providers:
In rural areas the Rural Development and Panchayat Raj Department has the
responsibility of providing water supply and sanitation services. The rural
58
programmes are implemented and maintained by Rural Panchayat Raj Institutions.
The responsibilities to water supply and sanitation for urban areas lies with the
Karnataka Urban Water Supply and Drainage Board (KUWS and DB) along with
Urban Local Bodies (ULBs).
3.8 Drinking Water Supply:
In Karnataka ground water is the major source of drinking water in both rural
and urban areas. Over 90 percent of rural habitations and 40 percent of urban local
bodies exclusively depend upon ground water.
It is found that about 59 percent of the households have connections to tap
water supply in the state. The other major sources of drinking water are hand pump
and open well respectively at 17 and 12 percent of households. The percentage of
households with tap water connection is high in the state as compared to all India
level. However, there is a big gap across rural and urban areas in the state as
78 percent of urban households have tap water connection it is only 48 percent
among rural households.
Across the districts only in 13 districts more than 58 percent of households
have tap water connections as the major source. It includes districts of Bangalore
Urban, Bellary, Dharwad, Mysore, Gadag, Kolar, Haveri, Bangalore Rural,
Davangere, Mandya, Koppal, Chitradurga and Shimoga. In districts such as
Belgaum, Chamarajnagar, Gulbarga and Bijapur over 50 percent of the households
collect drinking water from sources other than tap.
Access to and adequate quantity of drinking water is a major issue in urban
areas. Karnataka has experiences significant urbanisation (about 34%) as compared
to the all India level (31%) which increases the task of providing water supply
services to urban people. The KUWS and DB has adopted the adequacy norm of
59
drinking water supply stipulated by the Central Public Health Engineering and
Environmental Organisation (CPHEEO) ranging from 70 to 135 LPCD depending
upon population. Out of 208 ULBs for which information is available only
23 percent of the ULBs have adequate quantity of drinking water supply. All towns
in Bangalore Urban, Kolar, Tumkur, Udupi, Chitradurga, Dharwad, Gadag, Haveri,
Raichur and Bagalkot districts suffer from inadequate quantity of drinking water
supply.
3.9 Sanitation Services:
Sanitation facilities are as important as that of adequate quantity and quality
of drinking water in the maintenance of health and hygiene. Sanitation facilities such
as sewerage system, storm water drain, latrines (public or private) and other
community sanitation services form an integral part in maintaining hygiene and
clean environment. Realising the significance and necessity of sanitation services the
Karnataka government has taken up various programmes to provide and promote
sanitation services in both rural and urban areas.
It is found that about 38 percent of households have latrine facility at their
residence. However, over 62 percent of the households including rural and urban do
not have latrine facility. Drainage is another important sanitation facility required for
carrying out waste water generated from households and other establishments, rain
water, etc., to keep rural and urban habitation in hygiene condition. But around
50 percent of the households do not have connection to drainage system.
3.10 Urban Sanitation Facilities:
Urban sanitation facilities mainly include provision of Underground
Drainage (UGD) system, waste water treatment plant, garbage collection and
disposal, public sanitation facilities like toilet/latrine, etc. Availability of these
60
services is essential in urban areas to maintain and promote health and hygiene due
to high density of population.
3.10.1 Underground Drainage:
The number of Urban Local Bodies (ULBs) provided with UGD system are
only 36 out of 226 in the state. None of the 5 municipal corporations in the state
have full coverage of underground drainage system. As a result large number of
urban people still depends upon soak pits, septic tanks and community latrines,
which increases the sanitation related problems.
3.10.2 Waste Water Management:
Most of the ULBs do not have Sewage Treatment Plants (STPs) to treat the
waste water. Even in majority of municipal corporations Sewage Treatment Plants
(STPs) are not provided.
3.10.3 Public Sanitation:
Public sanitation facilities such as latrines, toilets, etc., at the common places
like bus stand and markets form another type of sanitation services. But majority of
ULBs do not have these facilities and even wherever these facilities are available the
facilities are inadequate and not maintained properly.
3.10.4 Slums:
Slums are areas being low lying, having ill sanitary conditions, over crowded
population and hence a source of danger to public health. In urban areas in
Karnataka there are 2428 slums indicating the magnitude of the problem. Among the
districts Bangalore Urban has maximum number of slums (366), followed by
Gulbarga (179), Shimoga (153) and Bellary (136). All other districts have an
average more than 50 slums each.
61
3.11 Expenditure on Water Supply and Sanitation:
Government spending is an important input in providing water supply and
sanitation services to the population. Financial resources for water supply and
sanitation are provided by the central government, state government and also by
local government organisations (LGOs) in the state, while the state government has
the major responsibility. A study conducted by the Institute for Social and Economic
change has revealed that the share of expenditure on water supply and sanitation by
the state government was about 54 percent of the total expenditure (both rural and
urban together) while the share of central government and the ULBs were about
17 percent and 29 percent respectively.
Although there is an increase in the total amount spent on water supply and
sanitation in the state, there is a huge disparity in the allocation for the provision of
water supply and for creating sanitation facilities. The share of state government in
expenditure on sanitation is less as compared to that of water supply.
3.12 Urbanisation and Sanitation in an Urban Area – A Case Study of
Gulbarga City:
3.12.1 Population Growth:
Gulbarga city has sustained an average growth rate of 40 percent in
population in the last two decades inspite of being an industrially backward area.
The sustained growth rate can be attributed to the importance given to this city as
divisional head quarters and administrative hub and the development of the city as a
regional market and service centre. The following figure illustrates the population
growth trends of Gulbarga city.
62
Population Growth Trends of Gulbarga City
050,000
100,000150,000200,000250,000300,000350,000400,000450,000500,000
1961* 1971 1981 1991 2001
Year
Popu
latio
n
3.12.2 Population of Gulbarga City:
The decadal growth of population between 1961 and 2001 has been indicated
in the following table.
Table - 3.1
Population of Gulbarga City
Year Population Decadal Growth (%)
1961* 97,069 25.75
1971 1,45,588 49.98
1981 2,21,325 52.02
1991 3,10,920** 40.48
2001 4,30,265*** 38.38
Source: Census of India 2001 Note: * Changes in jurisdiction due to state reorganization in 1956. ** Gulbarga city includes GMC and outgrowths (Brahmpur, Biddapur, Rajapur and
Badepur) in 1991 census. *** Gulbarga city includes GMC and outgrowths (Kusnoor (part), Rajapur and Kotnoor
Darwesh) in 2001 census.
63
It is clear from the details in the above table that during the sixties (1961) the
decadal growth of population was 25.75 percent which rose to 49.98 percent in
1971, 52.01 percent in 1981 but declined to 40.48 percent in 1991 and further
38.38 percent in 2001.
3.12.3 Future Population Projection of Gulbarga:
The future projection of population of Gulbarga city has been indicated in
the following table. The projection is based on the average of the three methods viz.
1. Geometric Increase Method
2. Incremental Increase Method and
3. Arithmetical Increase Method
Table - 3.2
Future Population Projections
Year Average of Three Methods
2010 563,065
2011 580,389
2015 655,880
2020 766,283
2025 898,441
2030 1,057,631
2035 1,250,540
2040 1,485,639
2045 1,773,655
3.12.4 Population Density of Gulbarga City:
Population growth has resulted in high population density in Gulbarga during
the past three decades. While the city’s overall density is quite high the core area
64
and bazaar areas in the heart of the city are more densely populated than the fringe
areas. The population density of Gulbarga city is shown in the following table.
Table - 3.3
Population Density of Gulbarga
Year Population (Nos.)
Area (Sq. km.)
Population Density (Persons per Sq. km.)
1971 145,588 25 - 5823.52
1981 221,325 55 30 4024.09
1991 310,920 55 33 5653.09
2001 430,265 65 55 6619.46
Source: DPR
3.12.5 Sex Ratio in the Population of Gulbarga:
The current sex ratio (female population per 1000 male population) in
Gulbarga is 920, which is lower than the state urban average of 940 and higher than
national urban average of 901.
3.12.6 Literacy in Gulbarga:
Gulbarga has one of the lowest literacy rates in the district at 50.65 percent
as per 2001 census. The current literacy rate in the city is 66.7 percent. The male
literacy rate is 73 percent and the female literacy rate is 59.7 percent. The city
literacy rate of 66.7 percent is less than the state urban average of 71.4 percent and
national urban average of 70.1 percent.
3.13 Sanitation Arrangement in Gulbarga City:
The sanitation profile of Gulbarga city for the year 2011 have been provided
in the following table.
65
Table - 3.4
Sanitation Profile – 2011
2011 Sanitation Profile
Total Slums Remarks
Population 580,389 60196 Assumption made on total population since the data was unavailable
In % 10.37%
HH size 5.83 4.98
Total number of HH 99610 12085
Pit latrines 6973 1861 Observation made from AKM data and field surveys
In % 7.00% 15.40%
Water closets 73156 3179
In % 73.4% 26.3%
No latrines 16934 5692
In% 17.0% 47.10%
HHs using community / public toilets
2548 1354 It is observed that only 50% of community toilets are functioning
In% 2.6% 11.2%
Total HHs with latrines 82677 6394
Coverage (%) 83.0% 52.9%
Open Defecation 16934 5692 Observation made from AKM data and field surveys
In% 17.0% 47.1%
Source: AKM, Field Surveys, DPR & CCG
The relationship between population and the number of slums is clear from
the data indicated in the above table. For the total population of 580389 the number
of slums dwellers was 60196, which accounts for 10.37 percent. The household size
was 5.83 and the slum household was 4.98. Total number of household was 99610
of which slum household was 12085, pit latrines numbered 6973 of which in slums
were 1861 accounting for 7 percent and 15.40 percent respectively. There were
73156 water closets (WCs) in the city of which 3179 were in slums accounting for
17 percent and 47.10 percent respectively. The numbers of households using
66
community/public toilets were 2548 of which 1354 were in slums. Total households
with latrines were 82677 of which 6394 were in slums accounting for 83 percent and
52.9 percent respectively. Open defecation was practised by 16934 persons in
Gulbarga city of which 5692 belonged to slums.
3.14 Slum Sanitation in Gulbarga:
In Gulbarga city corporation there are 61 slum areas with a total population
of 60196 and 12085 households. Underground drainage (UGD) system in the town
does not cover slum areas. Access to safe disposal facilities including public
convenience facility are available only for 32.3 percent of slum households while the
remaining 21.39 percent of households have unsanitary toilet conditions and the rest
46.31 percent in the absence of any sanitation facility practice open defecation.
Majority of slum households practice open defecation (46.31%), 7.45 percent
households have individual pits (leach pits), shared as well as public pits and septic
tanks also exist though in small number. The following graph provides the details.
Slum Sanitation in Gulbarga
67
3.15 School Sanitation:
Water and sanitation have an impact in the enrolment and attendance of
children in the schools and their health conditions. It is in the regard the city
sanitation plan has taken school sanitation as one of the major component.
3.16 Schools in Gulbarga City Corporation:
The following table provides the details of schools in the Gulbarga city corporation.
Table - 3.5
Schools in Gulbarga City
Sl. No. School No. of Schools
1 Primary with Upper Primary 200
2 Primary 42
3 Upper Primary with Sec./H. School 5
4 Upper Primary only 1
5 Primary with upper primary & Sec./H. School 32
6 Secondary Only (8-10) 94
7 Secondary with H. Secondary (8-12) 5
Total 379
Source: CCG
Sanitation facilities in schools in Gulbarga city in terms of number of toilets
available are provided in the following graph.
Sanitation Facilities in Schools in Gulbarga City
68
It is observed that 25 percent of schools in Gulbarga city do not have toilet
facility for girls and 45 percent of schools do not have toilet facility for boys.
3.17 Septage Management:
The works of the plant are completed recently in year 2002 and are operating
satisfactorily. The quantity of sewage reaching the sewage treatment plant is meagre.
Farmers lift raw sewage from the manholes on the outfall sewer. The samples of
influent and effluent are not tested, due to which the effectiveness of the treatment in
terms of removal of BOD and suspended solids is not known. GCC has three suction
machines and cleaning equipment’s one of it being maintained by GCC and the
other two being operated and maintained by private agency which is used to clean
the septic tank sludge from the households.
3.18 Storm Water Drainage System:
The drainage system in Gulbarga city consists of three primary drains,
namely Kotnoor nallah, Kapanur nallah and another nallah in the eastern part of the
city. Saint Basveshwar Lake is a big lake, which provides another major water body.
Secondary and tertiary drains are built around these water bodies. The following
table provides the details.
Table - 3.6
Drains and Natural Channels
Drain Type Length (Kms) Distribution (%)
Open drains (Pucca) 77.00 77.00
Closed drains (Pucca) 23.00 23.00
Open drains (Kutcha) NA -
Subtotal (Drains) 100.00 100.00
Primary drain channels 10.00
Source: CCG
69
3.19 Solid Waste Management in Gulbarga City:
The Solid Waste generated in the City is 158.7 tons per day. A program for
improvement of Solid Waste management will be implemented in Gulbarga City in
line with the State policy as part of Nirmala Nagara Yojana. City Corporation’s health
department is responsible for the solid waste management in the town. Solid waste
includes commercial and residential wastes generated in municipal or notified areas in
either solid or semi-solid form excluding industrial hazardous wastes but including
treated bio-medical wastes. The following table provides the details.
Table - 3.7
Solid Waste Collection Details of Gulbarga City
Sl. No. Particulars Quantity
1 Population 4,30,108
2 Total Projected Population (2011) 5,33,201
3 Amount of Domestic Waste Generated (tons) 98
4 Amount of Commercial Waste Generated (ton) 37
5 Total Waste Generated Per Day (in tons) 158.7
6 Total Waste Collected Per Day (in tons) 142
7 Collection Performance (in %) 89
8 Construction Waste (in tons) 6.7
9 Street Sweeping Waste (tons) 15
10 Per capita Waste generated (in kgs) 0.29
Source: CCG
3.20 Projections for Solid Waste Management:
The projections for the solid waste management from 2010 to 2045 have
been provided in the following table.
70
Table - 3.8
Projections for Solid Waste Management in Gulbarga
Year Average per capita (kg)
Population (Average of Three Methods)
Projection of Solid Waste Generated (TDP)
2010 0.29 563,065 163.29
2015 0.29 655,880 190.21
2020 0.29 766,283 222.22
2025 0.29 898,441 260.55
2030 0.29 1,057,631 306.71
2035 0.29 1,250,540 362.66
2040 0.29 1,485,639 430.84
2045 0.29 1,773,655 514.36
Source: ASC
The details in the above table indicate the projections of solid waste
generated from 2010 to 2045. The solid waste generation is likely to grow from
163.29 (TDP) in 2010 to 430.84 (TDP) in 2045. The average per capital solid waste
is likely to remain 25 kg during 2010 to 2045 while population is projected to
increase from 563065 in 2010 to 1773655 in 2045.
3.21 Initiatives by the Government for Solid Waste Management:
Government of Karnataka has enacted the Karnataka Municipalities Act
1964 and Karnataka Municipal Corporation Act 1976 emphasising the need to
collect and dispose “rubbish and filth” in defined manner so as to keep the public
places clean. The state government has also formulated rules that regulate the
management of solid waste viz.,
• Municipal Solid Wastes (Management and Handling) Rules, 2000
• Karnataka State Policy on Integrated Solid Waste Management (ISWM)
• Bio-Medical Waste (Management & Handling) Rules, 1998
• Hazardous Waste (Management & Handling) Rules, 1989, 2000, 2003
71
• Batteries (Management and Handling) Rules, 2001 and
• Recycled Plastics (Manufacture and Usage) Rules, 1999.
• Guidelines for managing E-waste, 2002
3.22 Key Objectives on Solid Waste Management in Gulbarga City:
The solid waste management as part of sanitation program in Gulbarga city
has been found deficient in the following areas viz.,
• DTD collection is being done only in 14 wards leading to only 15 percent of
Household level coverage.
• Crude dumping of solid waste on the roadsides, open drains and vacant lands
was observed which creates unhygienic surroundings.
• Segregation of waste is not practiced in Gulbarga city.
• At present there is no scientific location for dumping the solid waste.
The waste is being indiscriminately being dumped.
• The sanitary workers are not provided with any protective equipment posing
health hazards.
3.23 City Sanitation Plan – Assumptions and Targets for Gulbarga City:
• Generally all Households will be connected to UGD by the year 2041.
• Zero OD status to be achieved by 2013.
• No. of households using community toilets would reduce over time as they
would be provided with individual household type toilets.
• Floating population: 10,000 per day in 2011.
In order to maintain desired sanitation levels and achieve improved health
and environment indicators certain standards have to be maintained. The following
norms have been prescribed for household sanitation.
72
Table - 3.9
Norms for Household Sanitation
A Household Sanitation Infrastructure
1 Latrine connected to septic tank 1 per household
2 Grit and grease trap 1 per household
B Public and Community Sanitary Conveniences
Public Toilet
1 Users per latrine seat 60 users/seat
Community Toilet
2 Users per latrine seat One seat toilet can cater for 20 households
C Septage Clearance, Treatment and Disposal
1 No. of septic tanks cleared per vehicle per day
3 tanks per day per vehicle
2 Frequency of septage clearance from septic tank
Once in 2 years
3 Septage volume removed per tank 2 cum
4 No. of operational days per annum 300 days
Sludge Drying Beds
5 Area per drying bed (average) 225 m
6 Dimensions of drying bed 15 m × 15 m
7 Thickness of liquid sludge layer in drying bed
0.20 m
8 Septage sludge drying cycle 10 days
9 Sludge volume per day 45 cum
D Waste Water Conveyance
1 Street collector sewers 1.50 m/household
2 Branch sewers 0.75 m/household
3 Trunk sewers 0.40 m/household
E Waste Water Treatment and Disposal
1 Reuse for irrigation/garden/parks Tertiary
2 Disposal into river
Secondary
73
F Solid Waste Management
1 Road length per sweeper 400-600 m
2 Sweepers per 1000 population 3
3 Garbage collection points 1 for 14 HHs. (75 persons)
4 Norms for road sweeping A Type – Daily sweeping - 20% B Type – Sweeping twice in a week - 30% to 40% C Type – Sweeping once in a week - 40% to 50%
5 One tractor trailer For every 25 kms of sweeping road length, 3 loaders/vehicle
6 One tipper truck For every 40 kms of sweeping road length, 4 loaders/vehicle
7 Water supply Posts 1 for 15 HHs. (75 persons) @ 45 Ipcd to 1 for 10 HHs. (50 persons) 1 Tap for 75 persons
8 Markets/slaughter house 1 worker / 400 m2 area, for two time cleaning everyday
Source: Hoshangabad CSP