a window to

e-DISCOURSE OF EXCISE

Some Perceptions about e-Governance

• e – Governance is an emerging discourse – the placement of the subject in the epistemological hierarchies is yet be decided

• The fragmented seminal ideas have yet be crystallized with a subtle conceptual comprehension

• In essence the e – Governance is transformation of Governance through ‘e’- the stress is obviously on

Governance rather than ‘e’

Perceptions contd

• The debate of translation vs transformation continues

• Internal efficiency vs external service – the line of separation is blurring

• The challenge of e-development haunts• The horizons of BPR go on transforming• Finally the concept as an indigenous

seminal idea searches for answers

Prohibition & Excise Discourse

• The Horizons extended out of the P&E Department

• It foresees integration of the Institutions related to the Prohibition & Excise Admn

• The Integrated Institutions are P&E Dept., DDB, APBCL and Toddy Corporation

• The Integration speaks of only Information systems

Functionalities

• Two dimensional

• Revenue and Enforcement

• Procurement & Distribution – APBCL

• Welfare regime – Toddy Corporation

Objectives

• Licensing and Monitoring the Licensing Conditionalities

• Realisation of Revenue items like License Fee, Excise Duty, Toddy Rentals, Label Registration Fee etc.,

• Enforcement regime to arrest NDP, ID, Adulteration of Toddy and proliferation of NDPS items

• Procurement & Distribution of Liquor• Welfare to Toddy Tappers

Critical Success Factors

• Arrest of the Revenue pilferage by effective monitoring of Licensing regime

• Effective enforcement functionalities

• Efficient procurement and distribution Policy for APBCL

• Effective integration of inter institutional structures

As Is Model

• Manual Licensing process• Physical reporting of Crime and Revenue

information. No integrated crime database• No integration of Information systems• Offline updation of Offtake information• Manual projection of Revenue growth and

trend analysis because of absence of data base and data warehouse

As Is Model - 2

• Offline issue of Purchase Orders

• Offline issue of Invoices

• No online information to Manufacturers for production and dispatch planning

• No online information to Retailers regarding the availability of stocks at Depots

To Be Model-1

• An Integrated Information System Platform• Online updation of crime Information• Online updation of Revenue Information• Online issue of Licenses• Online apply and issue of Purchase Orders

to Manufacturers• Online applying of Indent and issue of

Invoices

To Be Model - 2

• A payment gateway to enable online transactions• Availability of updated online stock information

to Manufacturers for effective production and dispatch

• Availability of online offtake information to Decision Makers

• Availability of updated crime and revenue information to Decision Makers

To Be Model - 3

• Development of Decision Support system to Decision Makers

• Development of Data Warehouse and Data Mining to enable DSS

• Online redressal of Grievances

• The project is thus treated as G to B rather than G to C

Existing Resources - 1

• Fragmented software applications

• 3 applications developed by APTS for Database development for the Department

• General Functions Module

• Enforcement Module

• Manufacturing Monitoring Module

• Two tier Architecture

• Visual Basic Front end and Oracle backend

Existing Resources - 2

• Sales, Finance and Accounts modules for APBCL• 83 work stations in the Department ( upto the level

of P&ESs ) • Two servers at APBCL HQs and work stations

upto the level Depots• Dial up Connections at Depots, CPE HQs and

APBCL HQs ( An ISDN also)• LAN at HQs

Proposed Solution (S/W)

• An Application for IIS

• An Application for online updation of Revenue, Crime and Offtake

• Dispatch Module for APBCL

• Training Module for Excise Academy

• HRMS Module

• A Module for Toddy Corporation

Proposed Solution (S/W)

• To make the existing architecture into 3-tier web enabled

• Front end to be PHP• ADODB to be the middle ware• LINUX as OS• Oracle 8i and 9i OR Postgres• PHP,LINUX & Postgres are opensource softwares

and ADOBD can map with any frontend and any backend and it is OPENSOURSE middleware

Proposed Solution (H/W)

• 6 Servers at CPE HQ

• 596 Work Stations upto the level of SHO

• 423 Printers

• 447 UPSs

Proposed Solution (N/W)

• 2 MBPS Leased Line from SNC to HQs

• 1 ISDN line for backup

• 2 Routers

• 50 Dialup Connections upto the level of P&ESs

• The perspective solution would be RAJiv Broad Band

Scope of Present Project

• Develop the IIS Application Base Model

• Mapping with ADODB for all Interfaces with Databases

• Database Designing ( with Postgres )

• Estimation of requirement of H/W

• Estimation of requirement of S/W

• Estimation of requirement of N/W

Scope of Present Project Contd

• Develop an application base model for MIS functionalities

– For updation of Crime Data– For updation of Revenue data– For online updation of Offtake

Scope of Present Project contd

• Develop an application base model for online applying and issue of License

• Develop an application for online applying and issue of Purchase Order

• Develop an application for online applying of indent and issue of invoice

• Creation of a payment gateway model

Utilities for the stake Holders - MIS

• The decision makers will be equipped with information to review and formulate policy decisions

• The availability of online offtake information benefits

• Manufacturers to plan production and dispatch• Retailers for online indenting of stock• Efficient enforcement• Efficient forecasting of Revenues

Utilities for the stake Holders – online transactions

• Online issue of licenses• Online issue of Pos• Online issue of invoices• Less human intervention• More comfort and speedy delivery of service

A Note on Data Warehouse and Mining

• Data Warehouse is identified as useful concept in the present analysis• The Extraction sources are identified as 6 years APBCL Offtake

data,Consumption dynamics and Crime data• Cleansing and transformation suggested upto the stage of 3rd

Normalisation• Different Data Marts suggested for Departmental licensing regime,

DDB, APBCL and Enforcement Division• Data Marts can be created for Maufacturers and Retailers• Data Marts for Licensing regime , Enforcement Division and DDB to

be virtual • For other institutions separate marts which can be unified into Data

Warehouse• Perspective goal is Data mining

Relevance of the Present Project

With some modifications and standardization the present software application can be rolled out in real

world

System analysis

Director ofenforcement

Secretary toCPE

JointCommissioner

Commissioner

JointCommissioner

DeputyCommissioner

(15) AsstCommissioners

(10)DeputyCommissioners

P&ESs (23)

AESs (71)

SHOs (335)

APBCL MD

GeneralManager

DEPOTs

Relevant dimensions ofOrganizational charts

Department of P&E APBCL

CONTEXT DIAGRAM-I

CONTEXT DIAGRAM-II

DFD-I

DFD-II

EVENT PARTITIONED MODEL

Updating the revenue information

Review information

Rev update

Revenue data storeUpdating offtake

information

Review information

Offtakeupdate

Off take data store

Licensee data store

Manufacturers data storeP&ES APBCL Depot

Update crime information

Review information

Crimeupdate Crime data store

P&ES Licensee data store

License application

License (IL-17)

Licensee data store

P&ES

Application for PO

PO

Process PO

APBCL PO Data store

Manufacturer

Issue license

License application

Licensee

License

Licenseprocess

Licensee data store

indent

Licensee

invoice

Stockissue

offtake

Update

P&ES

INVOICE

RETAILER

CRIME

ITEM

GRN DEPOT

MANUFACTURER

PO

GRNdet

INVdet

REVENUEDESPATCH

DESPdet.

ITEM det .

Stock

License

Detect

IssueReceipt

Supply

Order

Goods

ENTITY RELATIONSHIP DIAGRAM-

USE CASE DIAGRAM

CLASSIFICATION OF CLASSESCLASSIFICATION OF CLASSES

Update rev

Apply license

Apply PO

Update offtake

Update crime

License approval

PO

offtake report

crime report

revenue report

P&ES Depot

ManufacturRetailer/licensee

crime

License process

Update rev process Update crime process

Update offtake process

PO process

revenue

offtake

PurchaseOrder Depot Retailer

Manufacturer P_ES

Item CrimeRevenue

IDENTIFYING OBJECTS

Describing the Objects

P&ES

SEQUENCE DIAGRAM

Revenue Crime Retailer DepotItem/

offtakePurchase

OrderManufacturer

CPE

Of take query

Off take information

Update RevenueRevenue review

Update Crime

Crime review

For Review Revenue

Revenue information

rev review

For Review Crime

Crime information

Review

P & ES

QueryInformation including Revenue

Review

P&ES

SEQUENCE DIAGRAM

Revenue Crime Retailer DepotItem/

offtakePurchase

OrderManufacturer

APBCL HQ

Stock availability query

Response on stock availability

Off take query

Apply for POPurchase Order request

Issue PO

Manufacturer

PO

Off take information

DPE

ReviewOff take Information

Off take query

Review

For Review Crime

Crime Information

P&ES

SEQUENCE DIAGRAM

Revenue Crime Retailer DepotItem/

offtakePurchase

OrderManufacturer

Depot

Update

Off take information

Off take QueryOff take Information

IndentInvoice

Retailer

Off take Query

P&ES CPE

Approval

License Approval

For License Approval

Request For License Approval

Collaboration Diagram

P&ESPO

DEPOT

CRIME

RETAILER MANUFACTURER

user data

REVENUE

ITEM

Crime data

Revenue data updateCrime()

updateRevenue()

Updatetem()

Item data

requestPurchaseOrder() Purchas

e order data

deliveryItem()Delivery data

Indent data

licenseRequest()

licenseIssue()

Offtake Request

Offtake data

Item data

OfftakeRequest()

Itemdata

CLASS DIAGRAM

P u rc h as eO r d er

- o rd ern o :S tr in g-m an u fac tu r er :S trin g-d ate :D ate-D ep o t_ id :s tr in g- item id :s tr in g-q ty :in t-v a lu e :r ea l

+ c rea teO r d er ( ) :P urc h as eO rd er

+ is s u eO rd er ( ) :P u rc h as eO rd er

D ep o t

- d ep o tID :S tr in g-d is tr ic t:S tr in g- d ep o tN am e:S tr in g-ad d res s :S tr in g-p in :in t- c ity :S tr in g- p h o n eN o :in t- em ail:S tr in g

+ u p d ateD ep o t( ) :D ep o t+ v iew D ep o t(D ep o t:D ep o t) :v o id

R ev en u e

- d is tr ic tID :S tr in g- c ir c le id :S tr in g- ex c is eAr rear s :r ea l- r en ta lO n S h o p s :r ea l- tr eeT ax :r ea l-F in es _ C o n f is c a tio n s :r ea l- u s er C h ar g es :r ea l- o th er s 1 :r ea l- o th er s 2 :r ea l

+ u p d ateR ev en u e ( r ev en u e:R ev en u e) :v o id

+ rev iew R ev en u e ( ) :R ev en u e

I tem

- item id :S tr in g- item n am e:S tr in g- item s ize : In t- item s tr en g th :In t- item rate :r ea l- item _ c ateg o ry :S tr in g-q ty :r ea l-v a lu e :r ea l- d is tr ic tid :S tr in g- c ir c le id :S tr in g

+ u p d ateI tem ( )+ rev iew I tem ( )

+ v iew I tem ( )

M an u fac tu r er

- lic en s eN o :S tr in g-n am e:S tr in g-d is tr ic t:S tr in g-S ta te :S tr in g- p u rc h as eo rd er :P u rc h as eO r d er

+ u p d ateM an u fac tu r er ( ) :M an ufac tu r er

+ View M an u fac tu r er ( ) :M an u fac tu r er

R eta iler /L ic es n s ee

- lic en c eID :S tr in g-n am e:S tr in g-d is tr ic t:S tr in g- d ep o tID :S tr in g-c ir c le :S tr in g-ad d res s :S r in g-p in :in t- c ity :S tr in g- p h o n eN o :in t- ap p lic an t 's n am e:s tr in g-ap p lic an ts ad d res s :s tr in g- s lab :s tr in g

+ lis en c eR eq u es t ( ) :S tr in g+ s to c k R eq u es t( ) :I tem+ is s u e in v o ic e( ) :I tem

+ is s u e L ic en s e( )

E x c is eS u p er in ten d

-D is tr ic t:S tr in g- f ir s tN am e:S tr in g- las tN am e:S tr in g-ad d res s :S tr in g-p in :in t- c ity :S tr in g- p h o n eN o :in t- em ailId :S tr in g

+ u p d ateE x ic is eS u p er in ten d en t( ) :v o id

+ v iew Ex c is eS u p er in tend en t( ) :v o id

C r im e

- d tid :S tr in g- c ir c le id :S tr in g- r a id s : in t- c as es : in t-p er s o n _ ar r es t: in t-q u an tity _ s e ized :r ea l-v eh ic le_ s e ized :in t-v a lu e :r ea l- c as es _ P I :In t- c as es _ P T :In t- c as es _ P D :In t- n b w s _ p en d in g :In t- c as es _ c o n v ic ted :In t- c aes _ ac q u itted :In t

+ u p d ateC r im e(c r im e:C r im e) :v o id

+ rev iew C r im e( ) :C r im e

C las s D iag ram

Software Cost estimation

Function Point Counting

Low Average High Total

Inputs 51 * 3 = 153 24 * 4 = 96 4 * 6 = 6 273

Outputs 37 * 4 = 148 32* 5 = 160 3 * 7 = 21 329

Inquiries 3*4= 12 1 * 5 = 5 17

Internal Logical Files 12* 7 = 84 84

External Files Total UAFP: 703

Adjustment factors

S. No.1 Data Communication 52 Distributed Processing 53 Performance Objectives 54 Heavily used configuration 35 Transaction rate 56 On line data entry 57 End user efficiency 58 On line update 49 Complex logic 3

10 Reusability 311 Converse ease 412 Operational ease 413 Multiple sites 514 Facilitates change 3

59

1.23864.69Adjusted F.P 1.23*703=

Effort Adjustment Factor For the Funtion Points

Adjustment Factor .65+.01*59=

No.of MMSl.no Activity Productivity 864.69

FP for MM /Productivity1 Requirement 175 4.942 Prototyping 500 1.733 Architecture 300 2.884 Planning 500 1.735 Initial Design 400 2.166 Detailed Design 300 2.887 Design Review 400 2.168 Coding 50 17.299 Code Inspection 300 2.88

10 Integration Test 500 1.7311 User Documentation 50 17.2912 Function Test 300 2.8813 Integration Test 175 4.9414 System Test 400 2.1615 Acceptance test 350 2.4716 Quality Assurance 125 6.9217 Installation 400 2.16

TOTAL 79.22

S/W cost = 79.22 @25000 per MM 1980551.857

Man Months Calculations

S/W Estimation

Function Point Counting-Object Oriented

Application Level Low Average High Total

Inputs 51 * 3 = 153 24 * 4 = 96 4 * 6 = 6 273

Outputs 37 * 4 = 148 32* 5 = 160 3 * 7 = 21 329

Inquiries 3*4= 12 1 * 5 = 5 17

Internal Logical Files 12* 7 = 84 84

External Files Total UAFP: 703

Function Point Counting

Object Level Low Average High Total

Inputs 51 * 3 =153 24 * 4 =96 4 * 6 =24 273

Outputs 37* 4 = 148 32 * 5 =160 3 * 7 = 21 329

Inquiries 3*4 = 12 21 * 5 =105 16 * 7 = 112 229

Internal Files 25* 7 = 175 175

External Files -

Total UAFP: 1006

HARDWARE REQUIREMENT

Configuration QTY REQD. RATE VALUE(Rs.)1 RISC SERVER 1 1000000 1000000

i) 20 GB HDDii) 256 MB RAM

iii) TAPE DRIVE

iv)10/100 Mbps Ethernet

OS Linux2 MAIL/WEB SERVER 5 60000 30000000

i) 20 GB HDD

ii) 256 MB RAM

iv)10/100 Mbps Ethernet

3 PCs 596 35000 20860000

40 GB HDD256 MB RAM

10/100 Mbps Ethernet

1.44 MB FDD

4 PRINTERS 423 15000 6345000

460cps,24 pinDOT MATRIX

5 UPS 447 14000 6258000

1KVA ,30min.backup

Single Phase Input

with 4 nos BatteriesTOTAL COST = 34763000

H/W

Net Working

•

•

• •

•

•

•

•

•

•

•

•

•

•

•

•

•

• •

• •

•

District Network Centre ( DNC)

State Network Centre ( SNC)

HyderabadHyderabad

R R R R DistDist

SangareddySangareddy

NizamabadNizamabad

AdilabadAdilabad

KarimnagarKarimnagar

Warangal

Khammam

WestGodavari

East Godavari

Vishakapatnam

Vizianagaram

KrishnaGuntur

• AnantapurNellore

TirupatiChittoor

NalgondaNalgonda

Cuddapah

SecretariatSecretariat

•

• •

APSWAN NETWORKAPSWAN NETWORK

Vijayawada

Srikakulam

OngoleKurnool

MahboobnagarMahboobnagar

NETWORK TO DISTRICT HQ

Network diagram

ROUTER

PBX Conn.

LAN

State HQ

District office 1

LAN

MODEM

LAN

MODEM

DIALUP

DIALUP

VSNL

ISDN LINE

District office NRetailers

Manufacturers

Statewide network connectivity

DXX Network

2 Mbps Leased lines

from DOT

DSL500T Router

LAN

MODEM 56 Kpbs

LAN

Serial interface - E1 or V.35

DXX node

LAN

CPE

P&ES 1

P&ES #N

Connection diagram

MODEM 56 Kpbs

512 Kpbs Dedicated line

C 1

C 1

C #n

C #n

C #nC 1

Statewide network connectivity

DXX Network

2 Mbps Leased lines

from DOT

DSL500T Router

LAN

MODEM 56 Kpbs

LAN

Serial interface - E1 or V.35

DXX node

LAN

MD

DM 1 Connection diagram

MODEM 56 Kpbs

512 Kpbs Dedicated line

C 1

C 1

C #n

C #n

C #nC 1

DM #N

SERVER

Project Management

Total cost estimation

• Total cost estimation is around Rs 3.7 Crore• The cost did not take the S/W licenses into

consideration as the proposal is for open source • Maintenance cost is not estimated• Security and other measures like firewalls not

estimated• Thus the total cost could escalate to Rs4.5 to 5

Crore

Implementation model

• PPP model suggested

• Department, APBCL and Manufacturers are identified as stakeholders

• For capital investment a financier who could be replicated as Payment gateway

• The recoupment through collection of Transaction costs from Manufacturers

thank you