+ All Categories
Home > Documents > Final Presentation

Final Presentation

Date post: 24-Feb-2016
Category:
Upload: diallo
View: 30 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend
Description:
Final Presentation. Subject: Business Ethics. Group 3 Members. Fatima Aftab ( 2655 ) Saira Khan (01034) Anum Shahid (2643) Ali Farooq (2651) Danish- ur - Rehman (01008). The real face of cloning. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Popular Tags:
31
Final Presentation Subject: Business Ethics
Transcript
Page 1: Final Presentation

Final Presentation

Subject: Business Ethics

Page 2: Final Presentation

Group 3 Members Fatima Aftab (2655) Saira Khan (01034) Anum Shahid (2643) Ali Farooq (2651) Danish-ur-Rehman (01008)

Page 3: Final Presentation

The real face of cloning Cloning is the creation of an

individual that is an exact replica of another individual.

A complete organism is formed from the altered fertilized egg from the genes in the transferred nucleus.

Jurassic Park, based by Michael Crichton

Page 4: Final Presentation

Also, there is research being done on how to clone the species by extracting the DNA from frozen animals.

the panorama of cloning humans artificially is debatable

Why would anybody choose to clone human beings?Infertile couplesReplacing a deceased child

Page 5: Final Presentation

Ethical Issues regarding Human Reproductive Cloning

There are issues of Technical and medical safety.

Destabilizing the concept of family and reproduction.

Ambiguous relations of a cloned child with the progenitor

Harming the psychological development and also confusing personal identity of a clone

Promoting trends towards human enhancement and designer babies.

Page 6: Final Presentation

"John Stuart Mill regarded bringing children into being without the prospect of adequate physical and psychological support as nothing short of a moral crime."

Page 7: Final Presentation

THE SMELL TEST  Introduce the test

What would it smell like if we read about it in a newspaper or a blog?

Validity Why is this principle a valid guide to identifying ethical issues?

Application People will keep claiming to have created cloned babies, and

eventually someone will succeed, but at what cost? A lot of damaged children and disappointed parents.

Conclusion Cloning is unethical.

Page 8: Final Presentation

THE UTILITY TEST

Are we maximizing good and minimizing harm for all those affected?

We are subjecting the harm to be maximized through cloning as now the original share of one human being in the utility system will be consumed twice.

Page 9: Final Presentation

Why is this principle a valid guide to conduct?

Every life is valuable and everyone wants to live longer, we should try to maximize life for all humans.

Page 10: Final Presentation

Application Raelians claim that they have achived successful

cloning process without any solid evidence. The cloning technology is loaded with risks and the

numbers of success are 6/100 The ST effect on humans will be that their lives will be

made infinite but with least chances of success. The LT effects include lack of emotion, lack of

resources, dramatic disturbance of natural balance on earth.

Page 11: Final Presentation

Conclusion

This experimental technology should not be allowed to harvest further as it will result in the deaths of many volunteers.

Page 12: Final Presentation

THE RIGHTS TEST

Are we respecting the rights of those affected? No, we are not respecting the rights of others

through cloning as we shall be subjecting the others, especially the original biological humans, to a curtailment of their natural rights as these rights will be subdivided further.

Page 13: Final Presentation

Why is this principle a valid guide to conduct?  Persons deserve respect because they have

value in themselves.  Rights are what they need to have an existence that expresses that value.   If I recognize value in myself and I claim to have rights that recognize or protect that value, then unless I can show that others are different, they should have the same rights that I have.

Page 14: Final Presentation

Application Right to life is a Gift from God and we

should not usurp that right in the name of science.

Through cloning the fundamental rights of human beings are affected as now there will twice the subjects if the same right enjoyed by one human.

Page 15: Final Presentation

Conclusion Cloning is an utter violation of human’s

natural right to life and it should be banned for good. So, that no one should be able to misguide other human beings and lure them into this trap of eventual death.

Page 16: Final Presentation

EXCEPTIONS TEST

Introduce the test:  “Is that right that we making an exception for

ourselves?  Cloning can effect the life cycle of the nature build armies, cheap labor, and clones freedom of

speech Validity Everyone has equal rights everyone should be allowed to make clones of

themselves

Page 17: Final Presentation

Apply the testSpecify the action: Cloning is the uncertain practice What if everyone wants to do it?  what grounds will it be cloning legalized on. who will be given the rights to clone can it be possible for anyone to do it? noWhat if they did it to us? see babies die or what if you or I were a clone babyConclusion: It should be a highly protected process

Page 18: Final Presentation

THE CHOICES TESTIntroduce the test: “Are the people affected able to make their own

choices?” genetic disorders are not able to be curedValidity:Why is this a valid way to decide right or wrong? Society don’t give equal importance to the clone

Page 19: Final Presentation

 Application:  people choose what they think is best for them Are we giving others the freedom to choose?   Cloning is a freedom to choose Capabilities and implications of human cloning are

never forecasted Are we giving others the information to know what

they value in this situation?  reproductive cloning is not yet a fool-proof methodConclusionaddresses the complex moral, ethical and political issues

Page 20: Final Presentation

THE JUSTICE TESTIntroduce the test:

“Is this a fair distribution of benefits and burdens?” 

Human cloning lead to raise inequality and unfairness in society

produce greater discrimination among people and societies

Validity immoral logically unacceptable. risk a person`s sense of individuality and

uniqueness.

Page 21: Final Presentation

Application How are the benefits and burdens distributed? useful in curing genetic diseases human cloning is a very vague actionIs this distribution fair?  uncertain outcome clone is not viewed as equivalent Conclusion produce an unfair distribution

Page 22: Final Presentation

THE COMMON GOOD TEST

Introduce the test: - No Effective Role - AwarenessValidity: Since we all have access to the common

good and advantage from it, we all have obligations to create and maintain it.

Page 23: Final Presentation

THE COMMON GOOD TEST

Apply the test:What parts of the common good are

involved?

Producing organs e.g. (kidney transplant) Destructive and miserable facts

Page 24: Final Presentation

THE COMMON GOOD TEST

Explain why we have obligation to promote or protect the common good? Controversial issue Scientists are continuously trying to clone Scientists are capable to clone (cattle, sheep, goats, pigs and mice) Major errors: (placental defects, oversized fetuses, kidney and lung

problems, brain abnormalities and severe weight gain) Protect the lives and rights

Page 25: Final Presentation

THE COMMON GOOD TEST

Does the proposed action conflict with this obligation?No, there isn’t any conflict between the proposed action and obligation, because after applying the common good test both sides of the picture are very clear.

Page 26: Final Presentation

THE COMMON GOOD TEST

Conclusion: “The Real Face of Cloning” Terrible and damaging facts Common good test aids Question

Q: Each person, individually, must decide that cloning should be allowed or not and the governments should interfere to make the policy?

 

Page 27: Final Presentation

THE CHARACTER OR VIRTUE TESTIntroduce the test: Does this action represent the kind of person I amor want to be? Several reasons i.e. Isn’t a successful area Process is filled with errors Unethical activity Interference in natureValidity: influenced by our ethical actions. not acceptable in our societies.

Page 28: Final Presentation

THE CHARACTER OR VIRTUE TEST

Apply the test:Would this action help make you the kind of person you

want to be? As a human being and a society who isn’t allow cloning

and consider it unethical e.g. if someone asks me to clone my deceased grandfather. same affection love me the same way abnormalities and genetic disorders. So I wouldn’t want to be the kind of person who would

clone people.

Page 29: Final Presentation

THE CHARACTER OR VIRTUE TEST

Conclusion: brilliant advancement in medical technology Should not appreciate cloning Educate others Duty of scientists Pros and cons.

Page 30: Final Presentation

COMPARE CONCLUSIONS OF TESTS TO DRAW FINAL CONCLUSION

Objection on cloning declares unnecessarily harm to humans

cloning is unethical should not be promoted process of human cloning should be abandoned the governments should ensure cloning to be forbidden It should be limited only to clone organs Fear of a reduced sense of identity and individuality, in a

cloned person not interfere in nature by playing God Educate others with its true picture.

Page 31: Final Presentation

?


Recommended