Perdido Key Master Plan CharretteFinal PresentationOctober 22, 2012
DPZ wishes to express gratitude to the following for their support, assistance, lodging and meals donated to ensure the success of the Charrette. Many Thanks To All!
Perdido Key Association Escambia County Planning Dept.
Perdido Bay United Methodist ChurchDon and Joey CarterBella Luna Pizzeria
Happy HarborIsland Time Deli
The Jellyfish RestaurantLost Key Golf Club
Sunset Grille
and to Annie Griffin for her untiring efforts all week
Study Area
Conventional vs/ traditional planning
Conventional Suburban Development Traditional Neighborhood Development
Conventional vs/ traditional planning
Conventional vs/ traditional planning
BUSINESS PARK
Conventional vs/ traditional planning
STARTERHOME
Conventional vs/ traditional planning
MOVE UP
Conventional vs/ traditional planning
EXECUTIVE
Conventional vs/ traditional planning
DOWNSIZE CONDO
Conventional vs/ traditional planning
COMMERCIAL
Conventional vs/ traditional planning
Conventional vs/ traditional planning
COMPLETE
Conventional vs/ traditional planning
Complete Neighborhood Perdido Key
Land Use Map
!Civic!Commercial!Industrial!Tower!Multi-Family!Townhouse!Mobile Home!Single Family!Estate!!State Park!Public OS!Private OS!Vacant Lands!
Conventional Building Types & Open Spaces
Civic! Commercial! Industrial!
Hotel / Multi-family Tower! Multi-Family! Townhouse!
Mobile Homes! Single Family! Estate!
State Park! Public Open Space! Private Open Space!
Built Environment
Perdido Key Beach Mouse Habitat
Designated Wetlands
Remaining Development Lands
Properties with Development Agreements
Properties with Development Agreement Extensions
66 acres habitat mitigation for 20 years
66 ac = 60 ft. deep commercial buildings for 9 miles
66 ac = 40 ft. deep residential buildings for 13.6 miles
Comp. Plan Development Capacity
• 7,150 units cap:
• 3,800 units built (2012):• 3,300 units remaining:
• 2,850 units w/ development rights:• 450 units remaining:
100%
53% 47%
36% 6%
Existing Development
Existing + Proposed Development
Potential Development (500-1000 units)
Scale Comparison - Seaside Town Center
Scale Comparison - Seaside
Scale Comparison - Rosemary Beach Town Center
CR-30A Real Estate Sale Comparison
CR#30&A#Real#Estate#Sales#Comparison!2011!Home!Sale!Closings
Home#Sales#1/4#mile#North#of#Gulf All#Home#Sales$"Price/"Sq."Foot $"Price/"Sq."Foot
Seaside 495 650
Rosemary!Beach 364 619
Alys!Beach 558 563
Watercolor 390 359
Seacrest!Beach 195 235
Seagrove!Beach 219 212
Regional Transportation Context
Pensacola
US-98
Orange Beach
Perdido Key
Fole
y Be
ach
Expy
Baue
r R
d.
Perdido Key Drive - Context-Sensitive Streets
Urban Center / C5-CenterGeneral / C3-SuburbanPark / C1-Natural
Safer Bend -‐ PK Dr.
CROSSWALK at Villagio -‐ PK Dr.
Beach Access Parking Access
Proposed Perdido Key street secAons -‐ transiAon
ConverAble Streets
ConverAble Streets
WCI
w/ USFWSvia
Corps of Engineers
Incidental Take Via
COE 404 PermitSection 7 permit
HCPDetermination
ofConsistency
USFWS ATL DC
DOI [Interior]
66 Acres to be administered
Locally
Section 10 permit
EISFDOT
FHWA
USFWS
Section 10 permit
Regulatory AcAvity per Beach Mouse
Perdido Key - 4 lanes
Traffic EsAmates
Traffic EsAmates
4.7 percent / year
Pedestrian Fatality PotenAal
Plan Slide
Traffic = Counts + 3,500 Units
Traffic EsAmates
Perdido Key Drive at Gongora Drive
Traffic EsAmates VaryPe
rdid
o K
ey D
r.
Gongora Dr.
!"!!!!
!5,000!!
!10,000!!
!15,000!!
!20,000!!
!25,000!!
!30,000!!
North!South!! East!
Counts!
2030!Build!
HPE!
Traffic Count Telemetry StationsSouthern Traffic Services installsPermanent Recorders on State Contract
Counts are taken every 15 minutes, 365 days a year
Traffic Count Telemetry
Network \ Scenario ExisAng Future PK Plan
ExisAng 2L X X
Future Demand for 4L X
Future Hybrid 2L and 4L X
Traffic Analysis of CharreTe Plans
Perdido Key Pedestrian Sheds
A BC
D
E
Special Area Plan
Projects with Development Agreements
Detail Area Property Lines Overlay
WCI Property Overlay
Necessary Thoroughfares
Detail Area Perdido Key Beach Mouse Overlay
Detail Area Designated Wetlands Overlay
Illustrative Special Area Plan 1
Development Impact
21 acres mitigation (from 66 HCP)28 acres independent mitigation (WCI)
Town Center A
Town Center A
Preliminary Town Center Options B
Illustrative Town Center B - Phase 1
Illustrative Town Center B - Phase 2
Town Center B
Town Center B
St Armand’s Circle
Special Area Master Plan 2
Special Area Master Plan 2
Detail Area Development Agreements Overlay
Detail Area Development Agreements Overlay
Town Center C
Detail Area PKBM & Designated Wetlands Overlay
Town Center C
Detail Plan Town Center C
Town Center C
Neighborhood Detail Plan
Flora-bama Town Center
Detail Area Property & Building Overlay
Detail Area Perdido Key Beach Mouse Overlay
Detail Area Designated Wetlands Overlay
Illustrative Flora-bama Town Center D
Flora-bama Town Center D
Flora-bama Town Center D
Preliminary North Perdido Key Neighborhood Center E
Detail Area Property & Building Overlay
Detail Area Designated Wetlands Overlay
Illustrative North Perdido Key Neighborhood Center E
Existing Zoning
Current Zoning Districts Analysis
Code Discrepancies
PROBLEM #1:Zoning R1-PK allows for single-family, duplex and multi-family housing, HOWEVER, area mostly single-family homes.
Code Discrepancies
PROBLEM #2:What is on the ground does not reflect what property is zoned.
Zoning R3-PK allows up to 8-story buildings, HOWEVER area mostly single-family homes.
Code Discrepancies
PROBLEM #3:
Zoning CGPK only allows 13 du/acre, HOWEVER density on the ground is much higher, in some cases, twice as much.
Code Discrepancies
PROBLEM #4:
Zoning CGPK & CCPK only allows 80% lot coverage for new buildings, HOWEVER the footprint of existing and proposed buildings cannot exceed 25% max.
Code Discrepancies
PROBLEM #4:
Zoning CGPK mixed in with R2-PK, which allows for10-story commercial buildings between single-family and small residential buildings.
Code Discrepancies
PROBLEM #6:
Zoning PRPK allows 5 du/acre max. but allows 10-story multi-family buildings, HOWEVER this discourages good urbanism.
Zoning Districts Conversion
New Zoning Districts
Proposed Regulating Plan