Final Project Proposal 2015-2016 - miracosta.edu · 2.1 Final Project Proposal Checklist Complete...

Proposal Name

MiraCosta Community College DistrictCommunity College District

MiraCosta CollegeCollege or Center

July 1, 2013Date

A P x W x C x E x

Final Project Proposal

2015-2016Community College Construction Act of 1980

Capital Outlay Budget Change Proposal

OC Instructional Building I

District: MiraCosta Community College DistrictCollege: MiraCosta CollegeProject: OC Instructional Building IPrepared by: HMC Architects/FPACS Date:

Section Description Status Date1.1 Title Page Complete 5/4/20132.1 Final Project Proposal Checklist Complete 5/4/20133.1 Approval Page - Final Project Proposal (with original signatures) Complete 5/4/20133.2 Project Terms and Conditions Complete 5/4/20134.1 Analysis of Building Space Use and WSCH - JCAF 31 Complete 5/7/20135.1 Cost Estimate Summary - JCAF 32 Complete 5/20/20135.2 Quantities and Unit Costs supporting the JCAF 32 Complete 5/20/2013

(Insert the optional cost analyses into this section.)6.1 California Energy Commission Approved Audit Complete 5/19/2013

Responses to Specific Requirements -- State Administrative ManualComplete 5/30/2013

(Also provide this section electronically in Word 6. Version) Complete 5/30/20138.1 California Environmental Quality Act: Environmental Impact Report

or Exemption Notice Complete 5/19/20139.1 Analysis of Future Costs Complete 5/19/2013

10.1 Campus Plot Plan Complete 5/16/201310.2 Diagrams of Building Areas (include floor plans with building areas

affected.) (Insert half-sized scaled conceptual drawings into the FPP.)Complete 5/16/2013

10.3 Site Plans Complete 5/16/201310.4 Floor Plans Complete 5/16/201310.5 Exterior Elevations Complete 5/16/201311.1 Guideline-Based Group II Equipment Cost Estimates - JCAF 33 Complete 5/7/201312.1 Justification of Additional Costs exceeding Guidelines (as needed)

NA NA13.1 Detailed Equipment List Complete 5/30/2013

2.1 Final Project Proposal Checklist

July 1, 2013

7.1

Budget Year: 2015-2016

District: MiraCosta Community College District

Project Location: MiraCosta College(College, campus, or center)

Project Name: OC Instructional Building I

The district proposes funds for inclusion in the State capital outlay budget (check items): site acquisition preliminary plans x working drawings x construction x equipment x

District Certification

Contact Person: Tom Macias Telephone: 760-757-6691(Facilities, Planning and Development)

E-Mail Address: [email protected] Fax:

Approved for submission: Date: (Chancellor/President/Superintendent Signature )

District Board of Trustees Certification

(President of the Board of Trustees Signature and Date) (Secretary of the Board of Trustees Signature and Date)

Date Completed:

Attach a copy of the Board Resolution that substantiates approval of the application and promises to fulfill the Project Terms and Conditions.

3.1 Approval Page

Final Project Proposal

The Governing Board of the District approves the submission of this application to the Board of Governors of the California Community Colleges and promises to fulfill the succeeding list of Project Terms and Conditions.

760-757-8185

Sacramento, CA 95814

Chancellor’s Office

Submit proposal to:

Reviewed by: California Community Colleges1102 Q Street, 4th Floor

Chancellor's Office CertificationFacilities Planning and Utilization

mailto:[email protected]

3.2 PROJECT TERMS AND CONDITIONS

MiraCosta Community College District College:

Budget Year: 2015-2016

1

2a.

b.

c.

d.

e.

f.

g.

3a.

b.

c.

4a.

b.

c.

The appropriation is made only to fund the project presented in this application, as it is finally approved, regardless ofwhether the actual cost is less than or equals the appropriation.A reduction in the scope of the project or assignable areas shall result in a proportionate reduction in the funds available from the appropriation.

The failure to abide by each of the assurances made herein entitles the Board of Governors of the California Community Colleges to withhold all or some portion of any funds awarded on this application.Any fraudulent statement which materially affects any substantial portion of the project presented in this application, asit may be finally approved, entitles the Board of Governors of the California Community Colleges to terminate thisapplication or payment of any funds awarded on the project presented in this application.

It is further understood that:The appropriation which may be made for the project presented in this application does not make an absolute grant ofthat amount to the applicant.

Architectural or engineering supervision and inspection will be provided at the construction site to ensure that the workwas completed in compliance with the provisions of Section 81130 of the Education Code and that it conforms withthe approved plans and specifications.Pursuant to the provisions of Section 8 of the Budget Act , no contract will be awarded prior to the allocation of funds to the Board of Governors by the Public Works Board.

It is understood by the applicant that:No claim against any funds awarded on this application shall be approved which is for work or materials not a part ofthe project presented in this application as it will be finally allocated by the Public Works Board.

If the application is approved, the construction covered by the application shall be undertaken in an economical mannerand will not be of elaborate or extravagant design or materials.

Pursuant to the provisions of Section 81837 of the Education Code , approval of the final plans and specifications forconstruction will be obtained from the Board of Governors of the California Community Colleges before any contract islet for the construction.No changes in construction plans or specifications made after approval of final plans which would alter the scope ofwork, function assignable and/or gross areas, utilities, or safety of the facility will be made without prior approval of theChancellor’s Office of the California Community Colleges and the Department of General Services Division of theState Architect.Pursuant to the provisions of Section 57001 of Title 5, an adequate and separate accounting and fiscal records andaccounts of all funds received from any source to pay the cost of the proposed construction will be maintained, andaudit of such records and accounts will be permitted at any reasonable time, during the project, at the completion of theproject, or both.

The applicant hereby requests State funds in the amount prescribed by law for the project named herein. All parts and exhibitscontained in or referred to in this application are submitted with and made part of this application.

The applicant hereby assures the Board of Governors of the California Community Colleges that:Pursuant to the provisions of Section 57001.5 of Title 5 no part of this application includes a request for funding theplanning or construction of dormitories, stadia, the improvement of sites for student or staff parking, single purposeauditoriums or student centers other than cafeterias. The facilities included in the proposed project will be used for oneor more of the purposes authorized in 57001.5 of Title 5.

Any State funds received pursuant to this application shall be used solely for defraying the development costs of theproposed project.

District: MiraCosta College

Project: OC Instructional Building I

* Indicates manual override

JCAF 31- OC Instructional Building I (MiraCosta College (Oceanside Campus)/MiraCosta CCD) (Official) CCI: 5754 D (7/13)

Reconst. Rm. Type Description TOP No. Department No. Rms No. Sta Room No. ASF WSCH Capacity Sec. ASF Increase In Space

110 Classroom 0099 General Assignment T400 -3,550 -1,679 -1,679

110 Classroom 0099 General Assignment B4400 Bldg 7,700 14,013 -1,072 6,628

210 Class Lab 1230 Nursing B4400 Bldg 12,100 4,795 -1,838 10,262

310 Office 0099 General Assignment B4400 Bldg 2,400 -362 2,038

620 Exhibition 6140 Museums and Galleries 2,960 2,960

650 Lounge 0099 General Assignment 500 500

680 Meeting Room 0099 General Assignment 1,000 1,000

715 DP/Computer Service 0099 General Assignment T400 240 -113 127

Totals: 26,900 15,258 -5,064 21,836

CFIS #: 40.31.XXX

Page 1 of 1JCAF 31

5/30/2013http://fusion.deltacollege.edu/code/planning/project/reports/31/default.asp?ID=202

COST ESTIMATE SUMMARY AND ANTICIPATED TIME SCHEDULE - JCAF 32: Print Save Reset DeleteCampus: MiraCosta College (Oceanside Campus) (MiraCosta CCD) CFIS Ref. #: 40.31.XXX

Project Title: OC Instructional Building I (Official) Date Prepared: 5/20/2013 Original CCI: 5754 Budget Ref #: Request For: L P W C E Original EPI: 3147 Prepared by: HMC/FPACS

Total Cost State Funded District FundedState-Supportable Non State-Supportable

1. Site Acquisition Acres: 2. Plans Budget CCI: 5754 $932,203 $466,102 $466,101 A. Architectural Fees (for preliminary plans) $435,558 B. Project Management (for preliminary plans) $155,556 C. Preliminary Tests (soils, hazardous materials) $43,600 D. Other Costs (for preliminary plans) $297,489

3. Working Drawings Budget CCI: 5754 $622,270 $311,135 $311,135 A. Architectural Fees (for working drawings) $497,781 B. Project Management (for working drawings) C. Office of the State Architect, Plan Check Fee $0 D. Community College Plan Check Fee $44,489 E. Other Costs (for working drawings) $80,000(Total PW may not exceed 13% of construction) True4. Construction Budget CCI: 5754 $15,555,643 $7,777,821 $7,777,822 A. Utility Service $310,118 B. Site Development, Service $465,763 C. Site Development, General $301,321 D. Other Site Development $94,013 E. Reconstruction F. New Construction (building) (w/Group I equip) $14,102,380 G. Other $282,048

5. Contingency $777,782 $388,891 $388,8916. Architectural and Engineering Oversight $311,113 $155,557 $155,5567. Tests and Inspections $378,084 $189,042 $189,042 A. Tests $155,556 B. Inspections $222,528

8. Construction Management (if justified) $336,082 $168,041 $168,0419. Total Construction Costs (items 4 through 8 above) $17,358,704 $8,679,352 $8,679,35210. Furniture and Group II Equipment Budget EPI: 3147 $775,537 $387,768 $387,76911. Total Project Cost (items 1, 2, 3, 9, and 10) $19,688,714 $9,844,357 $9,844,357

12. Project DataOutside

GSFAssignableSquare Feet

RatioASF/GSF

Unit CostPer ASF

Unit CostPer GSF 14. State Funded

District Funded District FundedTotalSupportable Non Supportable

Construction 41,385 26,900 0.65 $524 $341 Acquisition Reconstruction Preliminary Plans $466,102 $466,101 $466,101

13. Anticipated Time Schedule Working Drawings $311,135 $311,135 $311,135 Start Preliminary Plans 8/1/2015 Advertise Bid for Construction 5/1/2017 Construction $8,679,352 $8,679,352 $8,679,352 Start Working Drawings 12/1/2015 Award Construction Contract 7/1/2017 Equipment $387,768 $387,769 $387,769 Complete Working Drawings 7/1/2016 Advertise Bid for Equipment 4/1/2018 Total Costs $9,844,357 $9,844,357 $9,844,357 DSA Final Approval 3/1/2017 Complete Project 1/1/2019 % of SS Total 50.00% 50.00% SS Total: $19,688,714

Page 1 of 1JCAF32 Cost And Schedule

5/24/2013http://fusion.deltacollege.edu/code/planning/project/reports/32/default.asp?ID=202

California Community CollegesFinal Project Proposal

Page 1

5.2 - Quantities and Unit Costs Supporting the JCAF 32State Supportable Costs

MiraCosta Community College District Date: July 1, 2013College: MiraCosta College Prepared By: HMC Architects/FPACS

Project: CCI / ENR: 5754 3147Construction Months: 18

NOTE: Total fees may not exceed 13% 9.0%

1 SITE (District owned) $0

2 PRELIMINARY PLANSA. Architectural Fees (for Preliminary Plans) 8% x $15,555,643 x 0.35 $435,558

B. Project Management for Preliminary Plans 1.0% x $15,555,643 $155,556

C. Preliminary Tests (Soils, hazardous materials) 1) Soils Tests & Geotechnical Reports $20,0002) Topographic/Land Survey $20,0003) Geologic Hazard Report $3,600

$43,600

D. Other Costs (for Preliminary Plans)1) SWPPP $10,0002) Data/Technology Consultant $70,0003) Waterproofing Consultant $60,0004) Constructability Review Consultant $30,0005) CEQA (Negative Declaration) $40,0006) DSA Plan Check Fee from below $87,489

$297,489

Total- Preliminary Plans $932,203

3 WORKING DRAWINGSA. Architectural Fees (for Working Drawings) 8% x $15,555,643 x 0.40 $497,781

B. Project Management (for Working Drawings) 0.0% x $15,555,643 $0

C. Office of State Architect, Plan Check Fee(1) Structural Safety Fee 0.007 x $1,000,000 $7,000

0.005 x $15,555,643 - $1,000,000 $72,778

(2) Physically Handicapped Fee 0.004 x $500,000 $2,0000.002 x $1,500,000 $3,000

0.0002 x $13,555,643 $2,711$7,711

Total -State Supportable DSA, Plan Check Fee

D. Community College, Plan Check FeeState Funded: 2/7 of 1% of Construction Cost $15,555,643 x 0.00286 $44,489

E. Other Costs (Legal Advertising)(EIR),etc.1) Printing and Advertising $70,0002) Legal Services $10,000

$80,000

Total - Working Drawings $622,270

District:



Page 2




District:


4 CONSTRUCTIONA. Utility Service

(1) Site Mechanical UtilitiesWater Supply (a) Point of Connection, Piping, Appurtenances, DW 125 LF @ $59.68 $7,460 (b) Point of Connection, Piping, Appurtenances, FL 175 LF @ $149.24 $26,117Sanitary Sewer

(a) Point of Connection, Piping, Appurtenances 175 LF @ $82.09 $14,366

Storm Drainage

(a) Point of Connection, Piping, Appurtenances 200 LF @ $97.02 $19,404Fuel Distribution

(a) Point of Connection, Piping, Appurtenances 250 LF @ $44.80 $11,200Total - Site Mechanical Utilities $78,547

(2) Site Electrical Utilities (a) Power and Communication 425 LF @ $223.80 $95,116 (b) Site Lighting 59,495 SF @ $2.29 $136,456

Total - Site Electrical Utilities $231,572Total - Utility Service $310,118

B. Site Development Services(1) Paving (a) Concrete Curb and Gutter 390 LF @ $31.63 $12,335 (b) AC Paving, 3" AC / 8" AB 2,880 SF @ $6.93 $19,969 (c) Sign with Pole 3 EA @ $376.40 $1,129

Total - Paving $33,434(2) Pedestrian Walks (a) Concrete Walk 7,380 SF @ $6.83 $50,384 (b) Concrete Pave at Drop Off 2,500 SF @ $7.57 $18,935 (c) Concrete Ramp, Curb Cut 2 EA @ $1,118.96 $2,238 (d) Concrete Thickened Edge 800 LF @ $15.31 $12,246 (f) Concrete Seat Wall 175 LF @ $179.05 $31,334 (g) Trash Enclosure 1 EA @ $14,919.22 $14,919

Total - Pedestrian Walks $130,056(3) Landscaping (a) Landscape and Irrigation, Perimeter 20,041 SF @ $7.47 $149,650

(b) Landscape and Irrigation, Planters at Building 3,725 SF @ $14.93 $55,631

(c) Landscape and Irrigation, Planters at Paving 1,650 SF @ $22.40 $36,963 (d) Landscape and Irrigation, Restore at Removed Buildings 6,464 SF $7.47 $48,265 (e) Trees, 24" Box 15 EA @ $784.32 $11,765

Total - Landscaping $302,273 Total - Site Development Services $465,763

C. Site Development, General(1) Site Preparation (a) Clear & Grub 59,495 SF @ $0.21 $12,693

Total -Site Preparation $12,693


Page 3




District:


(2) Site DemolitionDemo Existing Portable Buildings (a) Demo Portable Building T400 1,920 LS @ $7 $14,352 (b) Demo Allied Health Building 4400 3,956 SF @ $16.68 $65,966 (c) Hazardous Waste Remediation 3,956 SF @ $4.89 $19,335

Total - Site Demolition $99,653(3) Site EarthworkOver Excavate and Recompact 5' Deep (a) Excavate 7,407 CY @ $4.59 $33,976 (b) Scarify and Compact 40,000 SF @ $0.43 $17,068 (c) Fill, Spread 7,407 CY @ $1.97 $14,617 (d) Fill, Allow 25%for Shrinkage, Import 1,852 CY @ $17.12 $31,704 (e) Fill, Compact 8,518 CY @ $3.52 $29,985Over Excavate and Recompact 2' Deep (a) Excavate 1,449 CY @ $4.59 $6,647 (b) Scarify and Compact 19,495 SF @ $0.43 $8,318 (c) Fill, Spread 1,449 CY @ $1.97 $2,860 (d) Fill, Allow 25%for Shrinkage, Import 362 CY @ $17.12 $6,202 (e) Fill, Compact 1,666 CY @ $3.52 $5,865 (f) General Site Grading, Rough 59,495 SF @ $0.21 $12,693 (g) General Site Grading, Fine 59,495 SF @ $0.32 $19,040

Total - Site Earthwork $188,975 Total - Site Development, General $301,321

D. Other Site Development1. Temporary fencing 1 LS @ $36,512.50 $36,5132. Temporary utilities 1 LS @ $57,500.00 $57,500

Total - Other Site Development $94,013

E. Reconstruction

Total - Reconstruction $0

F. New Construction (Building) (Including Group 1 Equip.)Room Description ASF Unit Cost Total

Classroom 7,700 ASF @ $476 $3,665,200Nursing Lab 12,100 ASF @ $565 $6,836,500

Faculty Office 2,400 ASF @ $502 $1,204,800Exhibition Area 2,960 ASF @ $529 $1,565,840

Staff Lounge 500 ASF @ $474 $237,000Meeting Room 1,000 ASF @ $474 $474,000Data Processing 240 ASF @ $496 $119,040

Total - New Construction 26,900 ASF $14,102,380

G. Other1. Energy Efficiency Incentive x 2% $282,048

Total Other $282,048

Total - Construction $15,555,643

$14,102,380


Page 4




District:


5 CONTINGENCY OF 5% (7% for Remodels)5% x $15,555,643 $777,782 $777,782

6 ARCHITECTURAL AND ENGINEERING OVERSIGHTA. Architects' Fee for Oversight 8% x $15,555,643 x 0.25 $311,113

7 TESTS AND INSPECTIONSA. Testing 1% x $15,555,643 $155,556

B. Inspection 19 mo @ $11,712.00 = $222,528 $222,528Total - Test and Inspection $378,084

8 CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT (if justified) 2% x $15,555,643 $311,113DIR Labor Compliance Fee 0.25% x $9,987,429 $24,969

$336,082

9 TOTAL (Construction costs) (Item 4 through 8 above) $17,358,704

10 FURNITURE AND GROUP II EQUIPMENT State Supportable $775,537

11 TOTAL (Project cost) (Items 1, 2, 3, 9, and 10) $19,688,714

Summary of State and Local Cost Contributions

State $ Local $ State% Local %

1 Site Acquisition $0 $0 100.00% 0.00%

2 Preliminary Plans $466,102 $466,102 50.00% 50.00%

3 Working Drawings $311,135 $311,135 50.00% 50.00%

4 Construction $7,777,822 $7,777,821 50.000% 50.000%

5 Contingency $388,891 $388,891 50.00% 50.00%

6 A&E Oversight $155,556 $155,556 50.00% 50.00%

7 Testing & Inspection $189,042 $189,042 50.00% 50.00%

8 Construction Mgmt $168,041 $168,041 50.00% 50.00%

9 Total Construction (Sum 4 thru 8) $8,679,352 $8,679,352

10 Equipment $387,769 $387,769 50.00% 50.00%

11 Total Project $9,844,357 $9,844,357 50.00% 50.00% Total %100.00%

Total $

$775,537

$777,782

$932,203

$19,688,714

$0

$15,555,643

$311,113

$378,084

$336,082

$17,358,704

$622,270

6.1 CALIFORNIA ENERGY COMMISSION APPROVED AUDIT

This project will be designed to exceed Title 24, Part 6 Energy Code by 15%, consistent with the Boardof Governors Energy and Sustainability policy. The design should incorporates sustainable goals forsite, energy efficiency, water use reduction, storm water management, occupant health as well asminimizing the buildings impact on the environment both by design and construction. Strategies willconsider:• Natural and native planting materials will be incorporated around the building to minimize, if noteliminate, the irrigation demand.• Concrete walkways will be minimized to reduce storm water runoff and promote natural filtrationinto the soil as well as a reduction in the heat island effect.• Overhangs have been incorporated to shade glazing.• Low E dual glazing will be incorporated to reduce heat gain.• Roofing will incorporate cool roofing to reduce the heat island effect and heat gain.• Heating and cooling will be provided by a highly energy efficient HVAC system.• Independent HVAC controls provided where applicable.• Natural lighting will be incorporated into most spaces.• Energy saving lighting with automatic lighting controls and sensors.• Interior materials will be low in volatile organic compounds, high in recycled content.• Water efficient fixtures, faucets and devices will be incorporated.• A strict recycling program will be required during construction.• Requested participation in the local utility’s energy incentive program.• Photovoltaic panels will be incorporated where appropriate.

STATE OF CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF FINANCE CAPITAL OUTLAY 915 L Street BUDGET CHANGE PROPOSAL (COBCP) Sacramento, CA 95814 NARRATIVE PAGE (REV 06/12) IMS Mail Code: A15

BUDGET YEAR 2015-16

ORG CODE: 6870 COBCP NO: PRIORITY: PROJECT ID: 40.31.

Narrative, Page 1 of 10

A. PURPOSE OF THE PROJECT

1. Executive Summary Mira Costa College located in Oceanside is the only college in the MiraCosta Community College District. Growing student demands have put a strain on program space in the allied health areas - the nursing and surgical technician program spaces are overcrowded. The scope of this project constructs a new building east of the Administration Building for the allied health programs and the art gallery. Project spaces include 7,700 assignable square feet (asf) lecture, 12,100 asf lab, 2,400 asf office and 4,700 asf other for a total of 26,900 asf. The scope includes the site work and construction of the new building, and also the demolition of the existing allied health building (space inventory building #4400) and the faculty office modular (space inventory building #T400). The project generates a net increase of 15,258 Weekly Student Contact Hours (WSCH). This is a Category B project – increasing instructional space. 2. Problem Statement MiraCosta College, also known as the Oceanside Campus, is the single college in the MiraCosta Community College District. The District also delivers instruction at two educational centers, Community Learning Center in downtown Oceanside and San Elijo Center in Cardiff, and also at other outreach operations. Based on the District’s 2015-2019 Five-Year Construction Plan, MiraCosta College’s 2015 lab space is projected to have a capacity to lab ratio of 71%, signaling the campus will have only 71% of the lab space it needs. The College’s Allied Health Building (space inventory building #4400) located on the northeast part of the campus was constructed in 1976 and currently houses the nursing and surgical technician programs. Many of the nursing faculty offices reside in a 1975 portable separate from the Allied Health Building. The Allied Health Building does not meet student demands for the allied health programs. There are four nursing programs: certified nursing assistant (CNA); licensed vocational nurse (LVN); LVN to registered nurse (RN); and generic RN, and a surgical technician program. Specific instructional spaces issues include: • Student demand for additional classes cannot be met and delays completing their

educational goals. All program openings for nursing and surgical technician are filled due to limited program spaces. Current program capacity per academic year cohort for the CNA is 190, LVN is 24, LVN-RN is 20 to 36 (variance is dependent on space scheduling), RN is 40-44, and


BUDGET YEAR 2015-16



surgical technician is 16-18 students. The waiting list to get into the LVN and surgical technician programs is 4 years, 3 years for the LVN to RN program, and there are 250 qualified applicants who have met their requirements (via the statewide criteria) on the list for the RN program.

• Students compete for the same learning spaces which compromises their learning experience. Due to a shortage of space, lectures, simulations and practice labs are often held in various spaces making it difficult for faculty to lecture, teach in a lab setting and for students to practice their skills easily (Example: short lecture in the practice lab prevents students from using the lab). Student practice time is compromised with students and faculty constantly juggling their schedules as students must be supervised by faculty in the lab at all times.

• Spaces are not equipped or configured appropriately hindering students' experiences as they transition from academia into the work world. Simulation space for the nursing and surgical technician programs does not resemble a realistic healthcare setting and does not allow students to learn skills easily. The need to move chairs and tables multiple times takes up valuable learning time.

• College cannot expand to add the two-semester medical assistant program to help meet workforce needs. Growing industry needs in this area put pressure on the College to supply the area with qualified workers. The College is scheduling to seek State Chancellor’s Office approval of the medical assistant program in fall 2014 and this new program will compete for scarce instructional space.

• Faculty offices are in a separate building from the Allied Health Building and results in students to lose practice time. Lab experience requirements call for faculty to be present. Faculty is not always easily available as they are in a separate building that is across the green area separating the Allied Health Building and offices. Student loses valuable practice time retrieving and waiting for faculty.

• Art Gallery space is too small and not configured for art displays. Studies have shown that while science and art are somewhat opposites, the two poles are naturally attracted enhancing the attributes of both disciplines; hence, the placement of the campus’ art gallery in a building supporting science programs was identified as part of the recently completed 2011 Comprehensive Educational and Facilities Master Plan. The goal was to support interdisciplinary collaboration between the two programs. The skill of displaying art is an important part of students’ professional and business venue experience and is particularly valuable as many students transfer to four-year higher education institutions including UCLA. The College is on track to submit to the


BUDGET YEAR 2015-16



State Chancellor’s Office for approval of a certificate program for Gallery and Museum Studies in spring 2014.

3. Solution Criteria To mitigate these problems, the college seeks a solution that meets the following criteria: • Separate spaces allowing for lectures, simulations, and lab practices; • Increased learning spaces for students to practice and meet minimum practice hour

requirements; • Simulated rooms (patient and operating rooms) that model what hospitals and medical

care facilities currently have; • Learning spaces with program adjacencies to create a smooth flow from lecture to

simulation to lab experiences; • Faculty offices in the same building close to programs for easy student access and

collegial collaboration; • Flexible instructional spaces adaptable for multi-disciplines to increase efficiency; • Art gallery program space designed to support art programs that is highly visible on the

campus; • Lab spaces equipped with appropriate technology with building support systems; • Permanent on-campus solution that does not adversely impact campus’ operational

budget; • Instructional spaces consistent with the mission, the strategic plan and the educational

plan. • Building infrastructure that support modern instruction and comply with building codes;

and • Least cost solution to mitigate instructional space issues.

B. RELATIONSHIP TO THE STRATEGIC PLAN The District’s 2011 Comprehensive Master Plan identified institutional goals:

• Commitment to innovation and best practices, broad access to higher education, and environmental sustainability;

• Ensuring student success; • Effective planning and decision making using data; • Demonstration of high standards of stewardship and fiscal prudence; and • Being a conscientious community partner,

To help achieve these Districtwide goals, the compressive master plan included facilities planning principles: right size the campus to address program needs; enhance campus environment, maximize functional spaces, eliminate non-functional spaces, enhance the campus environment; develop sustainability; and improve the utilization and efficiency of existing spaces.


BUDGET YEAR 2015-16



This project is in sync with the goals and principles spelled out in the master plan by addressing the need for additional program spaces, eliminating non-functional and temporary spaces, and creating flexible, modern and interdisciplinary spaces.

C. ALTERNATIVES 1. Alternatives In considering alternatives the College looked at options that help achieve the primary needs of the College’s educational and facilities master plans. Alternatives to this project include: • Alternative # 1 – Construct a larger building • Alternative # 2 - Construct modular buildings on campus • Alternative # 3 - Lease space off-campus

Alternative #1 – Construct a larger building This alternative constructs a new building for the allied health programs and the art gallery consisting of 7,700 asf lecture, 12,100 asf lab, 2,400 asf office, and 4,700 asf other for a total of 26,900 asf. The existing Allied Health Building and modular building T400 will be demolished. This option expands the space needs of the allied health programs allowing increase of enrollments. It also provides flexible learning spaces that simulate “real life” hospitals and health care facilities. Faculty offices are adjacent to their programs; instructional spaces provide the technology and built-in equipment for the programs to help students successfully transfer their skills. This option is a permanent, on-campus solution that does not adversely impact the College’s operational budget, and is the least cost solution. This option requires a capital investment from both the District and the State. Alternative #2 – Construct modular buildings on campus This alternative provides 26,900 asf in modular buildings to address instructional needs for these programs.

This option provides the expanded space to support the modern teaching modalities however it is limited in the “real life” simulation of hospitals and medical care facilities. Program adjacencies would be limited as lecture, lab and simulation spaces could be separated and faculty offices may not be adjacent to programs due to modular space constraints. This option is not consistent with the campus’ strategic plan, does not provide a permanent solution and adversely impacts the College’s operational budget.


BUDGET YEAR 2015-16



Alternative #3 – Lease space off-campus This alternative requires a long-term lease of space adjacent to the College suitable for the required instructional program needs requiring the lease of 26,000 asf of space to accommodate the instructional, instructional support, and office spaces. The rented space will also provide adequate parking and security services and spaces will require the approval of the Division of the State Architect. Locating a leased space and negotiating tenant improvements would be difficult for these types of specialized medical spaces. This off-site option does not benefit students who might have transportation difficulties and creates other issues with scheduling and logistics. Allied health programs require many lab hours and this option creates a hardship on students and faculty. Additionally, this option drains the College’s operational budget as it is the most expensive of the alternatives considered. The option is also not consistent with the College’s master plan and is not a permanent solution. (Continued on next page)


BUDGET YEAR 2015-16



2. Criteria Analysis Matrix

CRITERIA

Alternative #1 Construct New

Facility

Alternative # 2 Construct Modulars

Alternative # 3 Lease Space Off-Campus

Flexible-use separate spaces for lecture, simulation and lab functions

Yes No Yes

Increased learning spaces for students to meet minimum program lab practice requirements

Yes Yes Yes

Program adjacencies to enhance learning experience and promote collaboration

Yes No Yes

Room design and building infrastructure that supports the program technology

Yes No Yes

Art gallery learning space with natural lighting and ceiling height clearances

Yes No Yes

Permanent space Yes No No

Does not adversely impact the college’s operations budget

Yes No No

Supports the College’s strategic plan Yes No No

Is the least cost solution Yes No No


BUDGET YEAR 2015-16



3. Economic Analysis Matrix

Alternate #1* Alternate #2 Alternate #3

Construct New Facility

Construct Modulars

Lease Space Off-Campus

Site Acquisition $0 $0 $0 Plans & Working Drawings $1,554,473 $923,210 $0 Construction Costs:

Utility Service $310,118 $388,624 $0 Site Development, Service $465,763 $515,473 $0 Site Development, General $301,321 $305,332 $0 Other Site Development $94,013 $85,763 $0 Reconstruction $0 $0 $0 New Construction $14,102,380 $6,052,500 $0 Other Construction $282,048 $121,050 $0 Testing/Inspection $378,084 $308,927 $0 Contingency $777,782 $373,437 $0 CM/AE Oversight $647,194 $311,622 $0 Total Construction Costs $17,358,704 $8,462,728 $0

Equipment (Group II) $775,537 $775,537 $775,537 Leases for 50 years** $0 $0 $48,420,000 Replacement Cost (20 years)*** $0 $10,751,304 $0 Total Project Costs @ CCI 5754 and EPI 3147 $19,688,714 $20,912,779 $49,195,537

Escalated per Department of Finance Budget Letter BL 0X-XX

* Figures Taken from Units and Supporting Costs for the JCAF32 ** $3.00 per asf per month x 26,900 asf x 12 months x 50 years *** Replacement cost equals total construction minus site costs x 1.5


BUDGET YEAR 2015-16



D. RECOMMENDED SOLUTION

1. Which alternative and why? Alternative #1 – Construct a larger building: this alternative that meets all of the solution criteria. This option provides appropriate program spaces for allied health and the art gallery. Expansion of instructional spaces will translate to students getting increased access to the learning spaces they need to complete their studies. The art gallery will have the space attributes to help students display their art and learn business principles. This option provides permanent, centralized on-campus, flexible, and technologically-advanced instructional spaces to support the instructional programs in a “real life” manner. The new building also creates program adjacencies for students to more easily access faculty and for increased collegial communications and collaboration across programs. This alternative is also the least cost option. It does not adversely impact the College’s operational budget, and the instructional and facility outcomes are consistent with the District’s strategic plan. Why the other alternatives are not recommended: Alternative #2 - Construct modular buildings: this alternative is not recommended because it meets only some of the solution criteria. These temporary spaces cannot be configured fully to best serve the programs and does not mimic “real life” in hospitals and health care facilities. It also does not provide the physical attributes desired for the art gallery space. The installation and purchase or lease of these modulars would adversely impact the College’s operations budget plus it is not the least cost option. This option is not a permanent solution consistent with the campus’ strategic plan. Alternative #3 - Lease space off-campus: this option also does not meet all of the solution criteria. This alternative poses many challenges in finding adequate State approved space near the campus. This alternative distances the programs, faculty and students from campus, creating hardship for students in the logistical issues with transportation, scheduling and resources. It also creates a hardship on faculty as they need to be present during student lab hours. This alternative does not provide a permanent space solution that is consistent with the College’s strategic plan. This is the most expensive option and adversely impacts the campus operations budget.

2. Detail scope description This is a Category B project – increasing instructional space The scope of this project constructs a 26,900 asf building east of the Administration Building for the allied health programs and the art gallery. Project spaces include 7,700 asf lecture, 12,100 asf lab, 2,400 asf office and 4,700 asf other for a total of 26,900 asf. The scope


BUDGET YEAR 2015-16



includes the site work and construction of the new building and the demolition of the existing allied health building (space inventory building #4400) and the faculty office modular (space inventory building #T400). As reflected in the Space Analysis table below, this project adds substantial lab spaces to campus and the project scope does not exceed any of the Title 5 space guidelines. The project generates a net increase of 15,258 WSCH.

Space Analysis (ASF): Type Lecture Lab Office Library AV/TV Other Total

Primary 7,700 12,100 2,400 0 0 4,700 26,900 Secondary -2,751 -1,838 -362 0 0 -113 -5,064 Net 4,949 10,262 2,038 0 0 4,587 21,836 Beg. Cap/Load Ratios (2015) 84.8% 70.8% 96.5% 46.9% 11.0% N/A 73.3% End. Cap/Load Ratios (2018) 88.9% 75.8% 99.1% 43.7% 10.8% N/A 76.1%

The District is contributing 50% toward state-supportable project costs. 3. Basis for cost information The architect for this project, using cost guidelines provided by the State Chancellor’s Office, engineering data based upon the building specifications, and professional cost estimating, has provided the cost estimates. This project will be designed to exceed Title 24, Part 6 Energy Code by 15%, consistent with the Board of Governors Energy and Sustainability policy. The design should incorporates sustainable goals for site, energy efficiency, water use reduction, storm water management, occupant health as well as minimizing the buildings impact on the environment both by design and construction. Strategies will consider: • Natural and native planting materials will be incorporated around the building to

minimize, if not eliminate, the irrigation demand; • Concrete walkways will be minimized to reduce storm water runoff and promote natural

filtration into the soil as well as a reduction in the heat island effect; • Overhangs have been incorporated to shade glazing; • Low E dual glazing will be incorporated to reduce heat gain; • Roofing will incorporate cool roofing to reduce the heat island effect and heat gain; • Heating and cooling will be provided by a highly energy efficient HVAC system; • Independent HVAC controls provided where applicable; • Natural lighting will be incorporated into most spaces; • Energy saving lighting with automatic lighting controls and sensors; • Interior materials will be low in volatile organic compounds, high in recycled content;


BUDGET YEAR 2015-16



• Water efficient fixtures, faucets and devices will be incorporated; • A strict recycling program will be required during construction; • Requested participation in the local utility’s energy incentive program; and • Photovoltaic panels will be incorporated where appropriate.

4. Factors/benefits for recommended other than the least expensive alternative The project presents the least cost solution. 5. Complete description of impact on support budget It is anticipated that 30 full-time equivalent faculty and one additional classified position will be needed plus increased costs of maintenance and operations for the increased 15,258 asf. Please see 9.1 Analysis of Future Costs in this proposal for details. 6. Identify and explain any project risks No known risks have been identified for this project at this time. 7. List requested interdepartmental coordination and/or special project approvals (including mandatory reviews and approvals, e.g. technology proposals)

• Division of the State Architect and the State Fire Marshall review for structural safety, access compliance and fire life safety plan and field reviews

• State Public Works Board approval of preliminary plans

E. CONSISTENCY WITH CHAPTER 1016, STATUTES OF 2002 – AB 857 1. Does the recommended solution (proposed project) promote infill development by rehabilitating existing infrastructure and how? 2. Does the proposed project improve the protection of environmental and agricultural resources by protecting and preserving the state’s most valuable natural resources?

3. Does the proposed project encourage efficient development patterns by ensuring that infrastructure associated with development, other than infill, support efficient use of land and is appropriately planned for growth? Consistent with the provisions of AB 857, Chapter 1016, Statutes of 2002, the California Community Colleges are exempt from these specific provisions of this legislation.

8.1 CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACTENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT

(Reference: California Code of Regulations, Title 5, Section 57121)

It has been determined that a Negative Declaration will apply to this project. This declaration will be submitted to the appropriate agencies for approval prior to the submission of the Preliminary Plans to the Chancellors Office.

9.1 ANALYSIS OF FUTURE COSTS

Provide an economic analysis of additional instructional, administrative, and maintenance cost resulting from the proposed project, including personnel years. Disclose all new courses or programs to be housed in the projectthat may need Chancellor’s Office review.

Personnel Costs

Certificated:

Classified:

Depreciation, Maintenance, and Operation:

Program/Course/Service Approvals: List all new programs/courses/services to be housed in this project or its secondary effects and give the date of approval. If there are not new programs/courses/services for which approvalis required, please so state. This is not required for equipment-only projects.

Name of New Program/Course/Service Date of ApprovalMedical Assistant Fall 2014 (estimated)Gallery and Musuem Studies Spring 2014 (estimated)

It is estimated that thirty Full Time Equivelant certificated personnel will be needed to address the increase in 15,258 WSCH that will be generated by the additional space from this project. At an average cost of $70,000 per year, this cost is projected to be $2,100,000 per year. This revenue will be generated by FTES growth from the new enrollments.

One classified person will also be hired to support the expanded programs. It is estimated that the salary and benefit cost will be $60,000 per year.

Maintenance and Utility costs are projected to be $9 per assignable square foot of new building space. This equates to about 21,836 (26,900 - 5,064) asf x $9 = $196,524 annually.

* Indicates manual override

JCAF 33- OC Instructional Building I (MiraCosta College (Oceanside Campus)/MiraCosta CCD) (Official) EPI: 3147 D (7/13)3147 D (7/13)

Rm. Type Description TOP No. Department

No. Rms No. Sta Room No. ASF

Sec. ASF

Increase In Space

Equip Cost Per ASF

Total Allowable

Cost

110 Classroom 0099 General Assignment 7,700 -2,751 4,949 $14.71 $72,800

210 Class Lab 1230 Nursing 12,100 -1,838 10,262 $46.39 $476,054

300 - 355 Faculty Offices 0099 - 4999 General Assignment 2,400 -362 2,038 $23.01 $46,894

620 Exhibition 6140 Museums and Galleries 2,960 2,960 $39.48 $116,861

650 Lounge 0099 General Assignment 500 500 $23.84 $11,920

680 Meeting Room 0099 General Assignment 1,000 1,000 $23.84 $23,840

715 DP/Computer Service 0099 General Assignment 240 -113 127 $213.92 $27,168

Totals: 26,900 -5,064 21,836 $775,537

CFIS #: 40.31.XXX

Page 1 of 1JCAF 33

5/30/2013http://fusion.deltacollege.edu/code/planning/project/reports/31/default.asp?ID=202&VR=&APPRVD=&editCR=&cert=&33=y


13.1 Equipment

13.1 - Detailed Equipment List District: MiraCosta Community College District

Project: OC Instructional Building I College: MiraCosta College July 1, 2013

Rm # Room Description Item Description 1 Units Unit Cost Total CostLess Existing Inventory 2

Total New Equipment

Needed

ClassroomSmart Workstation 7 $2,400 $16,800 $16,800

Instructor Computer 7 $1,000 $7,000 $7,000LCD Projector 7 $1,000 $7,000 $7,000

Document Visual Presenter 7 $2,000 $14,000 $14,000Sound System 7 $1,000 $7,000 $7,000

AV Presentation Equipment & Cabling 7 $2,000 $14,000 $14,000Seminar Tables 52 $550 $28,600 $28,600

ADA Seminar Table 7 $600 $4,200 $4,200Student Chairs 385 $147 $56,595 $56,595Faculty Chair 7 $141 $987 $987Faculty Desk 7 $970 $6,790 $6,790

Free standing 36" Podium 7 $264 $1,848 $1,848Instructor Stool for Smart Station 7 $352 $2,464 $2,464

Telephone 7 $500 $3,500 $3,500

OR labbins 10 $100 $1,000 $1,000

Suction machines 2 $750 $1,500 $1,500Suture racks 2 $859 $1,718 $1,718

Laundry hampers 2 $150 $300 $300trash hampers 2 $150 $300 $300Kick buckets 2 $198 $396 $396

Biohazzard recptacles 2 $100 $200 $200small desk for lab 1 $970 $970 $970

Bovie 1 $45,000 $45,000 $45,000Sterile wrap cart 1 $2,500 $2,500 $2,500

Nursing labsElectric beds with head wall units 15 $8,500 $127,500 $127,500

Chair 100 $200 $20,000 $20,000Computers 30 $1,000 $30,000 $30,000

LCD Projector 6 $1,000 $6,000 $6,000Document Visual Presenter 7 $2,400 $16,800 $16,800

Baxter IV Pumps 1 $13,000 $13,000 $13,000Hanging Private Curtains/Hardware 15 $700 $10,500 $10,500

Laerdal birthing Mom 1 $35,000 $35,000 $35,000Tables for classrooms 32 $371 $11,872 $11,872

Telephone 7 $500 $3,500 $3,500bedside tables 11 $226 $2,486 $2,486overbed tables 11 $275 $3,025 $3,025

pyxis machine(meds) 2 $45,000 $90,000 $90,000


13.1 Equipment

podium 3 $264 $792 $792round tables for practice lab 8 $400 $3,200 $3,200

round computer tables 8 $550 $4,400 $4,400sim lab tables 2 $469 $938 $938

camera system for simulation 1 $6,000 $6,000 $6,000Vital Sign Machine 2 $27,000 $54,000 $54,000

Glucometers 6 $380 $2,280 $2,280manikins 3 $600 $1,800 $1,800

Faculty officesComputer 11 $1,000 $11,000 $11,000

Printer/Copier 11 $1,200 $13,200 $13,200Telephone 11 $500 $5,500 $5,500

Workstation Including Storage 11 $1,837 $20,207 $20,207Bookcases 36' Ht 11 $500 $5,500 $5,500Staff Task Chair 11 $733 $8,063 $8,063

Guest Chair 22 $188 $4,136 $4,136Table for Dean's office 1 $400 $400 $400

Art Gallery - GeneralLED LAMPS (wash & accent bulbs) 45 $60 $2,700 $2,700

Pedestals Various sizes 20 $150 $3,000 $3,000Video surveillance system /Grainger 1 $1,500 $1,500 $1,500

Benches to sit on while viewing exhibtion 2 $600 $1,200 $1,200

Reading/study roomin gallery Study table in gallery 60 x 29 ¼ x 42” 1 $888 $888 $888

Display bookcases for study/reading area 1 $704 $704 $704

Attendant/archivist/designer work station Exhibition attendant station telephone 1 $500 $500 $500

Telephone 1 $500 $500 $500printer/scanner/copier 1 $1,200 $1,200 $1,200

staff task chair 1 $733 $733 $733guest chair 1 $188 $188 $188

student intern chair 1 $188 $188 $188Lateral file cabinet Moveable 1 $300 $300 $300

Movable Bookcases with doors 1 $664 $664 $664cd/dvd burner 1 $200 $200 $200

Digital projectors (short throw, high lumen) reg. size 2 $1,200 $2,400 $2,400

Digital projectors (short throw, high lumen) micro. size 2 $600 $1,200 $1,200

Headphones for viewers to listen 6 $150 $900 $900

Equipment Storage

Small WorkshopsWood cabinet (wood, framing& installation

tools) 1 $2,000 $2,000 $2,000Driver/ Drill sets (cordless) 3 $290 $870 $870

Drill (with cord) 1 $250 $250 $250Drill Index 1 $100 $100 $100


13.1 Equipment

Power Jig Saw 1 $300 $300 $300Rolling cart-moving intallation materials

&equip 2 $211 $422 $422Lateral 4 drawer file cabinet Moveable 1 $600 $600 $600

Graphic StationComputer, iMac 27" 1 $2,200 $2,200 $2,200

Color Laser Printer, Large scale 18x 24" 1 $3,000 $3,000 $3,000Lrg size scanner Epson with tranparency

scanning1 1 $900 $900 $900Color Laser Printer (text and phaser) 1 $1,600 $1,600 $1,600

Telephone 1 $500 $500 $500 Six-Drawer Wood work table 1 $950 $950 $950

Bookcases 36' Ht 2 $500 $1,000 $1,000Staff Task Chair 1 $400 $400 $400

Guest Chair 1 $188 $188 $188

Audio RecordingExtra Battery 1 $59 $59 $59

Case for DSLR 1 $110 $110 $110Video, HD camera with cables, audio

adapter 1 $2,400 $2,400 $2,400Microphone and Mike stand and cables 1 $600 $600 $600

Lavlier mics 5 $160 $800 $800tie clip set 5 lavalier mics 1 $36 $36 $36

headset for audio recording/monitoring 1 $300 $300 $3001 light kit 500W soft box, 3 light 1 $585 $585 $585

metal rolling cabinet-storage, visual & audio equip 1 $635 $635 $635

Grand Total $775,537 $775,537

NET TOTAL REQUEST $775,537

Allocation $775,537

MIRACOSTA COMMUNITY COLLEGE DISTRICT One Barnard Drive, Oceanside, CA 92056 ∙ (760-757-2121) • Fax (760) 757-8185 Visit us on the Internet: http://www.miracosta.cc.ca.us

May 21, 2013 Jeff Cox San Diego Gas & Electric 8335 Century Park Court, CP12G San Diego, CA 92123 Subject: Savings By Design Program Participation for Mira Costa College Instructional Building #1 Dear Jeff Cox: I would like to participate in the Savings By Design Program. I understand that Savings By Design is a statewide nonresidential new construction and renovation/remodel energy-efficiency program, funded by utility customers through the Public Purpose Programs surcharge. I am interested in improving the energy efficiency of my project using design assistance and financial incentives available through the program. I agree to provide required documentation as requested. I am willing to consider efficiency recommendations, which may improve the performance of my project significantly beyond Title 24 (or other baseline) requirements. I understand that participation in the Savings By Design Program is voluntary, and that I am under no obligation to modify the design or construction of my building based on resulting recommendations. I also understand that I will receive financial incentives only if I complete an agreement, my eligibility is established by the utility, the performance of my building meets program requirements, and then only after the energy-efficiency strategies are installed and verified. Sincerely, Tom Macias Tom Macias Director of Facilities Email: [email protected] Fax: (760)757-8185

mailto:[email protected]

Date post:	02-Apr-2018
Category:	Documents
Upload:	phungtram
View:	233 times
Download:	2 times

Final Project Proposal 2015-2016 - miracosta.edu · 2.1 Final Project Proposal Checklist Complete...

Documents