Liberal Arts/Business/CSISProposal Name
Grossmont-Cuyamaca Community College DistrictCommunity College District
Grossmont CollegeCollege or Center
August 1, 2018Date
A P x W x C x E x
Final Project Proposal
2020-2021Community College Construction Act of 1980
Capital Outlay Budget Change Proposal
District: Grossmont-Cuyamaca Community College DistrictCollege: Grossmont CollegeProject: Liberal Arts/Business/CSISPrepared by: Gensler Date:
Section Description Status Date1.1 Title Page Complete 3/7/20182.1 Final Project Proposal Checklist Complete 6/12/20183.1 Approval Page - Final Project Proposal (with original signatures) Complete 3/7/20183.2 Project Terms and Conditions Complete 3/7/20184.1 Analysis of Building Space Use and WSCH - JCAF 31 Complete 6/7/20185.1 Cost Estimate Summary - JCAF 32 Complete 6/8/20185.2 Quantities and Unit Costs supporting the JCAF 32 Complete 6/8/2018
(Insert the optional cost analyses into this section.)
6.1 California Energy Commission Approved Audit Complete 6/8/2018Responses to Specific Requirements -- State Administrative Manual Complete 6/13/2018(Also provide this section electronically in Word 6. Version) Complete 6/13/2018
8.1 California Environmental Quality Act: Environmental Impact Report or Exemption Notice Complete 6/8/2018
9.1 Analysis of Future Costs Complete10.1 Campus Plot Plan Complete 6/8/201810.2 Diagrams of Building Areas (include floor plans with building areas affected.)
(Insert half-sized scaled conceptual drawings into the FPP.) Complete 6/8/201810.3 Site Plans Complete 6/8/201810.4 Floor Plans Complete 6/8/201810.5 Exterior Elevations Complete 6/8/201811.1 Guideline-Based Group II Equipment Cost Estimates - JCAF 33 Complete 6/7/201812.1 Justification of Additional Costs exceeding Guidelines (as needed) Complete 6/8/201813.1 Detailed Equipment List Complete 6/7/2018
2.1 Final Project Proposal Checklist
August 1, 2018
7.1
3.2 PROJECT TERMS AND CONDITIONS
Grossmont-Cuyamaca Community College District College:
Budget Year: 2020-2021
1
2a.
b.
c.
d.
e.
f.
g.
3a.
b.
c.
4a.
b.
c.
The applicant hereby requests State funds in the amount prescribed by law for the project named herein. All parts andexhibits contained in or referred to in this application are submitted with and made part of this application.
The applicant hereby assures the Board of Governors of the California Community Colleges that:Pursuant to the provisions of Section 57001.5 of Title 5 no part of this application includes a request forfunding the planning or construction of dormitories, stadia, the improvement of sites for student or staffparking, single purpose auditoriums or student centers other than cafeterias. The facilities included in theproposed project will be used for one or more of the purposes authorized in 57001.5 of Title 5.Any State funds received pursuant to this application shall be used solely for defraying the development costsof the proposed project.
District: Grossmont College
Project: Liberal Arts/Business/CSIS
Architectural or engineering supervision and inspection will be provided at the construction site to ensure thatthe work was completed in compliance with the provisions of Section 81130 of the Education Code and that itconforms with the approved plans and specifications.Pursuant to the provisions of Section 8 of the Budget Act , no contract will be awarded prior to the allocationof funds to the Board of Governors by the Public Works Board.
It is understood by the applicant that:No claim against any funds awarded on this application shall be approved which is for work or materials not apart of the project presented in this application as it will be finally allocated by the Public Works Board.
If the application is approved, the construction covered by the application shall be undertaken in aneconomical manner and will not be of elaborate or extravagant design or materials.Pursuant to the provisions of Section 81837 of the Education Code , approval of the final plans andspecifications for construction will be obtained from the Board of Governors of the California CommunityColleges before any contract is let for the construction.
No changes in construction plans or specifications made after approval of final plans which would alter thescope of work, function assignable and/or gross areas, utilities, or safety of the facility will be made withoutprior approval of the Chancellor’s Office of the California Community Colleges and the Department ofGeneral Services Division of the State Architect.
Pursuant to the provisions of Section 57001 of Title 5, an adequate and separate accounting and fiscal recordsand accounts of all funds received from any source to pay the cost of the proposed construction will bemaintained, and audit of such records and accounts will be permitted at any reasonable time, during theproject, at the completion of the project, or both.
The appropriation is made only to fund the project presented in this application, as it is finally approved,regardless of whether the actual cost is less than or equals the appropriation.A reduction in the scope of the project or assignable areas shall result in a proportionate reduction in the funds available from the appropriation.
The failure to abide by each of the assurances made herein entitles the Board of Governors of the CaliforniaCommunity Colleges to withhold all or some portion of any funds awarded on this application.
Any fraudulent statement which materially affects any substantial portion of the project presented in thisapplication, as it may be finally approved, entitles the Board of Governors of the California CommunityColleges to terminate this application or payment of any funds awarded on the project presented in thisapplication.
It is further understood that:The appropriation which may be made for the project presented in this application does not make an absolutegrant of that amount to the applicant.
* Indicates manual override
JCAF 31- Liberal Arts/Business/CSIS (Grossmont College/Grossmont-Cuyamaca CCD) (Official) CCI: 6596 D (12/17) Reconst.
Rm. Type Description
TOP No. Department No. Rms No. Sta Room No. ASF
WSCH Capacity Sec. ASF
Increase In Space
110 Classroom 0099 General Assignment Bldg 52 -16,802 -7,208 -7,208
110 Classroom 0099 General Assignment Bldg 55 -24,065 -10,324 -10,324
110 Classroom 0099 General Assignment 14,636 34,117 14,636
210 Class Lab 0701 Information Technology, General 4,424 2,587 4,424
210 Class Lab 0701 Information Technology, General Bldg 52 -2,918 -4,989 -4,989
310 Office 0099 General Assignment Bldg 52 -128 -128
310 Office 0099 General Assignment Bldg 55 -122 -122
310 Office 0099 General Assignment 362 362
410 Read/Study Room 6120 Library 1,980 1,980
530 Audio/Visual, Radio, TV 6130 Media Services 1,263 1,263
535 A/V, Radio, TV Service 6130 Media Services Bldg 55 -90 -90
715 DP/Computer Service 6780 Management Information Services 240 240
Totals: 22,905 -7,081 -22,861 44
CFIS #: 40.19.XXX
COST ESTIMATE SUMMARY AND ANTICIPATED TIME SCHEDULE - JCAF 32: To Q&UC Print Save Reset Delete District: Grossmont-Cuyamaca Community College District College: Grossmont College CFIS Ref. #: 40.19.XXX
Project Name: Liberal Arts/Business/CSIS (Official) Date Prepared: 6/7/2018 Estimate CCI: 6596 DoF Project ID: null Request For: L P W C E Round to Thousands: Escalation View: Estimate Estimate EPI: 3560 Prepared by: Gensler
Total Cost State Funded District FundedState-Supportable Non State-Supportable
1. Site Acquisition Acres: 2. Preliminary Plans Estimate CCI: 6596 $799,405 50.00% $399,703 50.00% $399,702 A. Architectural Fees (for preliminary plans) $486,737 B. Project Management (for preliminary plans) $139,068 C. Division of the State Architect Plan Check Fee D. Preliminary Tests (soils, hazardous materials) $58,600 E. Other Costs (for preliminary plans) $115,0003. Working Drawings Estimate CCI: 6596 $825,636 50.00% $412,819 50.00% $412,817 A. Architectural Fees (for working drawings) $556,271 B. Project Management (for working drawings) C. Division of the State Architect, Plan Check Fee $179,632 D. Community College Plan Check Fee $39,733 E. Other Costs (for working drawings) $50,000(Total PW may not exceed 13% of construction) True4. Construction Estimate CCI: 6596 $13,906,776 50.99% $7,091,113 49.01% $6,815,663 A. Utility Service $623,168 B. Site Development, Service $1,769,997 C. Site Development, General $563,639 D. Other Site Development $0 E. Reconstruction $10,631,041 F. New Construction (building) (w/Group I equip) G. Board of Governor's Energy Policy Allowance (2% or 3%) $318,931 H. Other5. Contingency $973,474 50.05% $487,237 49.95% $486,2376. Architectural and Engineering Oversight $347,669 50.00% $173,835 50.00% $173,8347. Tests and Inspections $421,014 50.12% $211,007 49.88% $210,007 A. Tests $139,068 B. Inspections $281,9468. Construction Management & Labor Compliance Program (if justified) $300,423 50.00% $150,212 50.00% $150,211 A. Construction Management $278,136 B. Labor Compliance Program $22,2879. Total Construction Costs (items 4 through 8 above) $15,949,356 $8,113,404 $7,835,952 $010. Furniture and Group II Equipment Estimate EPI: 3560 $274,625 0.00% 100.00% $274,62511. Total Project Cost (items 1, 2, 3, 9, and 10) $17,849,022 $8,925,926 $8,923,096 $0
12. Project DataOutside
GSFAssignableSquare Feet
RatioASF/GSF
Unit CostPer ASF
Unit CostPer GSF 14. State Funded
District Funded District FundedTotalSupportable Non Supportable
Construction Acquisition $0 $0 $0 $0 Reconstruction 31,933 22,905 0.72 $464 $333 Preliminary Plans $399,703 $399,702 $0 $399,702
13. Anticipated Time Schedule Working Drawings $412,819 $412,817 $0 $412,817 Start Preliminary Plans 8/1/2020 Advertise Bid for Construction 6/1/2022 Construction $8,113,404 $7,835,952 $0 $7,835,952 Start Working Drawings 2/1/2021 Award Construction Contract 8/1/2022 Equipment $0 $274,625 $0 $274,625 Complete Working Drawings 8/1/2021 Advertise Bid for Equipment 6/1/2023 Total Costs $8,925,926 $8,923,096 $0 $8,923,096 DSA Final Approval 4/1/2022 Complete Project 4/1/2024 % of SS Total 50.01% 49.99% SS Total: $17,849,022
QUANTITIES AND UNIT COSTS SUPPORTING THE JCAF 32(Project Cost Estimate)
District: Grossmont-Cuyamaca Community College District CFIS Ref. #: 40.19.XXX View Cost Escalations
Budget
Mid Point
College: Grossmont College Estimate CCI: 6596 DoF Project ID:Project Name: Liberal Arts/Business/CSIS (Official) Estimate EPI: 3560 Prepared By: Gensler Date: 6/7/2018 Budget CCI: 6596 Mo. Escalation Factor: 0.0042
Request For: L P W C E Budget EPI: 3560 Estimate
1. SITE ACQUISITION [Edit]
Acres: TOTAL SITE ACQUISITION COSTS: $0
2. PRELIMINARY PLANS 6596 A. Architectural Fees (for Preliminary Plans)
New Construction $0 x 8.0% x 35.0% $0 Reconstruction $13,906,776 x 10.0% x 35.0% $486,737
Total Architectural Fees: $486,737
B. Project Management (for Preliminary Plans) Contract Cost $13,906,776 x 1.0% $139,068
Total Project Management Fees: $139,068
C. Division of the State Architect Plan Check Fee
1. Structural Safety Fee Tier 1 Amt $0 x 1.25% $0 Tier 2 Amt $0 x 1% $0
$02. Fire, Life Safety Fee
Tier 1 Amt $0 x 0.3% $0 Tier 2 Amt $0 x 0.2% $0 Tier 3 Amt $0 x 0.1% $0 Tier 4 Amt $0 x 0.05% $0 Tier 5 Amt $0 x 0.01% $0
$03. Access Compliance Fee
Tier 1 Amt $0 x 0.5% $0 Tier 2 Amt $0 x 0.25% $0 Tier 3 Amt $0 x 0.1% $0 Tier 4 Amt $0 x 0.08% $0 Tier 5 Amt $0 x 0.06% $0 Tier 6 Amt $0 x 0.04% $0
$0Total Division of the State Architect Plan Check Fees: $0
D. Preliminary Test (Soils Tests & Geotechnical Report)
[Edit] Description Amount Non Supportable
California Geologic Hazard Fee $3,600
Hazardous Materials Survey $15,000
Structural Survey $20,000CEQA (Environmental Documents) $20,000
Total Preliminary Tests: $58,600E. Other Costs (Special Consultants, Printing, Legal, Etc.)
[Edit] Description Amount Non Supportable
Hazardous Substance Consultant $20,000
Waterproofing Consultant $30,000Constructability Review Consultant $40,000
SWPPP Consultant $25,000Total Other Costs: $115,000
TOTAL PRELIMINARY PLANS COSTS: $799,4053. WORKING DRAWINGS 6596
A. Architectural Fees (for Working Drawings)
Allocate to PP
Allocate to PP
New Construction $0 x 8.0% x 40.0% $0 Reconstruction $13,906,776 x 10.0% x 40.0% $556,271
Total Architectural Fees: $556,271
B. Project Management (for Working Drawings) Contract Cost $13,906,776 x 1.0% $0
Total Project Management Fees: $0
C. Division of the State Architect Plan Check Fee
1. Structural Safety Fee Tier 1 Amt $1,000,000 x 1.25% $12,500 Tier 2 Amt $12,906,776 x 1% $129,068
$141,5682. Fire, Life Safety Fee
Tier 1 Amt $1,000,000 x 0.3% $3,000 Tier 2 Amt $4,000,000 x 0.2% $8,000 Tier 3 Amt $8,906,776 x 0.1% $8,907 Tier 4 Amt $0 x 0.05% $0 Tier 5 Amt $0 x 0.01% $0
$19,9073. Access Compliance Fee
Tier 1 Amt $500,000 x 0.5% $2,500 Tier 2 Amt $1,500,000 x 0.25% $3,750 Tier 3 Amt $11,906,776 x 0.1% $11,907 Tier 4 Amt $0 x 0.08% $0 Tier 5 Amt $0 x 0.06% $0 Tier 6 Amt $0 x 0.04% $0
$18,157Total Division of the State Architect Plan Check Fees: $179,632
D. Community Colleges Plan Check Fees (2/7 of 1% of Construction Cost) Contract Cost $13,906,776 x 0.28571 x 1.0% $39,733
Total Community Colleges Plan Check Fee: $39,733E. Other Costs (Special Consultants, Printing, Legal, Etc.)
[Edit] Description Amount Non Supportable
Printing and Advertising $20,000
Legal Fees $10,000
Local Permit Costs $20,000Total Other Costs: $50,000
Total PW may not exceed 13% of Construction 10.2% TOTAL WORKING DRAWINGS COSTS: $825,636
4. CONSTRUCTION 6596 A. Utility Service
[Edit] Description Quantity Unit Unit Cost Subtotal Non Supportable Subtotal
01 General RequirementsTemporary Utilities
Temporary ElectricityTemporary electrical power equipment (pro-rated per job), connections, compressor or pump, 100 amp
1 Ea. x $549.36 $549.36
Temporary electrical power equipment (pro-rated per job), connections, office trailer, 100 amp
1 Ea. x $770.15 $770.15
Temporary Power, lighting, incl. service lamps, wiring and outlets, max
380 CSF Flr x $77.92 $29,609.60
$30,92926 Electrical
Common Work Results For ElectricalMedium-Voltage CablesCable terminations, outdoor systems, 15 kV, 2/0 solid to 350 kcmil stranded
12 Ea. x $870.08 $10,440.96
Allocate to WD
Allocate to WD
Medium-cable single cable, copper, XLP shielding, ungrounded neutral, 15 kV, 500 kcmil, in conduit, excl splicing & terminations
6 C.L.F. x $1,947.13 $11,682.78
Control-Voltage Electrical Power CablesControl cable, copper, THHN wire with PVC jacket, 600 V, 22 wires, #14
6 C.L.F. x $779.35 $4,676.10
Grounding And Bonding For Electrical SystemsInsulated ground wire, copper, stranded, 500 kcmil 4 C.L.F. x $2,354.79 $9,419.16
Exothermic weld, 4/0 wire to 1" ground rod 8 Ea. x $175.78 $1,406.24
Ground wire, copper wire, bare stranded, 3/0 10 C.L.F. x $1,458.71 $14,587.10
Grounding connection, brazed, #2 wire 10 Ea. x $48.02 $480.20
Grounding drive studs, 5/8" diameter 10 Ea. x $27.01 $270.10
Medium-Voltage TransformersPad-Mounted, Liquid-Filled, Medium-Voltage TransformersTransformer, liquid-filled, 5 kV or 15 kV primary, 277/480 V secondary, 3 phase, 1500 kVA, pad mounted
2 Ea. x $85,194.43$170,388.86
Exterior LightingLighting Poles And StandardsLight poles, anchor base, aluminum, 10' high, excl concrete bases
10 Ea. x $1,720.83 $17,208.30
Roadway LightingRoadway area luminaire, LED fixture, 252 LEDS, 120 V AC or 12 V DC, equal to 210 watt, incl lamp
4 Ea. x $2,807.75 $11,231.00
Area LightingInduction fixture, exterior, wall pack, 80 watt, incl lamps
10 Ea. x $1,404.03 $14,040.30
Walkway LightingBollard light, exterior, high w/ polycarbonate lens, high pressure sodium, 100 Watt, 42" high, incl ballast and lamp
10 Ea. x $1,947.10 $19,471.00
$285,30227 Communications
Communications Horizontal CablingCommunications Copper Horizontal CablingMultipair cable, unshielded non-plenum, 150 V PVC jacket, #22, 15 pair
2 C.L.F. x $543.75 $1,087.50
Unshielded twisted pair (UTP) cable, solid, plenum, #24, 4 pair, category 6
3 C.L.F. x $208.44 $625.32
Communications Coaxial Horizontal CablingCoaxial cable, fire rated, 93 ohm, RG A/U #62 cable 3 C.L.F. x $351.52 $1,054.56
$2,76733 Utilities
Common Work Results For UtilitiesUtility StructuresUtility structures, utility vaults precast concrete, 5' x 10' x 6' high, I.D., 6" thick, excludes excavation and backfill
2 Ea. x $9,061.05 $18,122.10
Water Utility Distribution PipingPublic Water Utility Distribution PipingWater supply distribution piping, fitting, 90 degree elbow, class 200 polyvinyl chloride, pressure pipe, 4", includes gaskets
10 Ea. x $543.37 $5,433.70
Water supply distribution piping, fitting, 90 degree elbow, class 200 polyvinyl chloride, pressure pipe, 6", includes gaskets
10 Ea. x $27.18 $271.80
Water supply distribution piping, fitting, coupling, class 200 polyvinyl chloride, pressure pipe, 4", AWWA C900, Class 150, SDR 18, includes gaskets
5 Ea. x $231.98 $1,159.90
Water supply distribution piping, fitting, coupling, class 200 polyvinyl chloride, pressure pipe, 6", AWWA C900, Class 150, SDR 18, includes gaskets
5 Ea. x $429.28 $2,146.40
Water supply distribution piping, fitting, tee, class 200 polyvinyl chloride, pressure pipe, 4", includes gaskets
3 Ea. x $369.64 $1,108.92
Water supply distribution piping, fitting, tee, class 200 polyvinyl chloride, pressure pipe, 6", includes gaskets
3 Ea. x $896.75 $2,690.25
Water supply distribution piping, piping polyvinyl chloride, pressure pipe, 4", AWWA C900, Class 150, SDR 18, excludes excavation or backfill
240 L.F. x $33.16 $7,958.40
Water supply distribution piping, piping polyvinyl chloride, pressure pipe, 6", AWWA C900, Class 150, SDR 18, excludes excavation or backfill
240 L.F. x $2.10 $504.00
Water Utility Distribution EquipmentWater Service ConnectionsWater Service Connection, tapping sleeves with rubber gaskets, 10" x 4", excludes excavation and backfill
3 Ea. x $2,763.02 $8,289.06
Water Service Connection, tapping sleeves with rubber gaskets, 10" x 6", excludes excavation and backfill
3 Ea. x $3,442.94 $10,328.82
Water Utility Distribution ValvesWater Utility distribution Valves, check valves, flanged cast iron, 4" diameter, includes bolts and gaskets
5 Ea. x $2,852.90 $14,264.50
Water Utility distribution Valves, check valves, flanged cast iron, 6" diameter, includes bolts and gaskets
5 Ea. x $13,042.77 $65,213.85
Water Utility distribution Valves, sleeve for tapping mains, 10" x 6", excludes excavation and backfill, add
4 Ea. x $3,034.00 $12,136.00
Water Utility distribution Valves, gate valve, O.S.&Y., with rubber gaskets, 6" diameter, excludes excavation and backfill
4 Ea. x $2,264.22 $9,056.88
Water Utility Distribution Fire HydrantsWater Utility Distribution Fire Hydrants, indicator post, adjustable valve size, 4" -14", 14'-0" bury, includes bolts and gaskets, excludes excavation and backfill
3 Ea. x $2,671.57 $8,014.71
Storm Utility Drainage PipingPublic Storm Utility Drainage Piping
Public Storm Utility Drainage Piping, 90 degree bends or elbows, corrugated metal
pipe, galvanized and bituminous coated with paved invert, 8" diameter, 16 ga.
8 Ea. x $473.06 $3,784.48
Public Storm Utility Drainage Piping, 90 degree bends or elbows, corrugated metal pipe, galvanized and bituminous coated with paved invert, 10" diameter, 16 ga.
8 Ea. x $570.90 $4,567.20
Public Storm Utility Drainage Piping, corrugated metal pipe, galvanized and bituminous coated with paved invert, 20' lengths, 16 ga., 10" diameter, excludes excavation and backfill
240 L.F. x $54.36 $13,046.40
Public Storm Utility Drainage Piping, corrugated metal pipe, galvanized and bituminous coated with paved invert, 20' lengths, 16 ga., 8" diameter, excludes excavation and backfill
240 L.F. x $69.78 $16,747.20
Public Storm Utility Drainage Piping, end sections, corrugated metal pipe, galvanized and bituminous coated with paved invert, 10" diameter, 16 ga., excludes excavation and backfill
3 Ea. x $552.55 $1,657.65
Public Storm Utility Drainage Piping, end sections, corrugated metal pipe, galvanized and bituminous coated with paved invert, 8" diameter, 16 ga., excludes excavation and backfill
3 Ea. x $299.03 $897.09
Storm Drainage StructuresStorm Drainage Manholes, Frames, And CoversStorm Drainage Manholes, Frames, and Covers, concrete block, radial, 6' deep, 4' inside diameter, excludes footing, excavation, backfill, frame and cover
3 Ea. x $3,758.65 $11,275.95
Hydronic Energy DistributionUnderground Hydronic Energy DistributionUnderground Hydronic Energy Distribution, pipe conduit prefabricated, polyurethane insulated system, black steel service pipe, std. wt. 1/2" Insulation, 250 degree F. maximum temperature, 3" diam. pipe size, excludes trenching, fittings or crane
240 L.F. x $164.84 $39,561.60
Electrical Utility Transmission And DistributionElectrical Underground Ducts And ManholesElectrical Underground Ducts and Manholes, PVC, elbows, 4" diameter, schedule 40, installed by direct burial in slab or duct bank
10 Ea. x $231.96 $2,319.60
Electrical Underground Ducts and Manholes, hand holes, precast concrete, with concrete cover, 2' x 2' x 3' deep, excludes excavation, backfill and cast in place concrete
4 Ea. x $2,627.25 $10,509.00
Electrical Underground Ducts and Manholes, man holes, precast w/iron racks
& pulling irons, C.I. frame and cover, 4' x 6' x 7' deep, excludes excavation, backfill and cast in place concrete
2 Ea. x $14,084.85 $28,169.70
Electrical Underground Ducts and Manholes, underground duct banks ready for concrete fill, PVC, type EB, 1 @ 4" diameter, excludes excavation, backfill and cast in place concrete
240 L.F. x $10.78 $2,587.20
Electrical Underground Ducts and Manholes, underground duct banks, PVC, fittings, type EB expansion joint, 4" diameter
5 Ea. x $362.44 $1,812.20
Electrical Underground Ducts and Manholes, PVC, base spacer, 4" diameter, schedule 40, installed by direct burial in slab or duct bank
3 Ea. x $33.25 $99.75
Electrical Underground Ducts and Manholes, PVC, bell end and cap, 4" diameter, schedule 40, installed by direct burial in slab or duct bank
3 Ea. x $144.92 $434.76
$304,169Total Utility Service: $623,168
B. Site Development - Service
[Edit] Description Quantity Unit Unit Cost Subtotal Non Supportable Subtotal
02 Existing ConditionsDemolition
Selective Site DemolitionMinor site demolition, abandon existing catch basin or manhole, excludes hauling
2 Ea. x $460.24 $920.48
Minor site demolition, pipe, sewer/water, 12" diameter, remove, excludes excavation, hauling
235 L.F. x $18.40 $4,324.00
Minor site demolition, pipe, sewer/water, steel, welded connections, 10" diameter, remove, excludes excavation, hauling
235 L.F. x $39.86 $9,367.10
Minor site demolition, pipe, sewer/water, steel, welded connections, 4" diameter, remove, excludes excavation, hauling
235 L.F. x $20.12 $4,728.20
Structure DemolitionBuilding demolition, large urban projects, concrete, includes 20 mile haul, excludes foundation demolition, dump fees
680000 C.F. x $0.83 $564,400.00
Bldg. footings and foundations demolition, floors, concrete slab on grade, plain concrete, 6" thick, excludes disposal costs and dump fees
45000 S.F. x $11.69 $526,050.00
Selective DemolitionSelective demolition, rubbish handling, loading & trucking, machine loading truck, includes 2 mile haul, cost to be added to demolition cost.
13840 C.Y. x $38.95 $539,068.00
$1,648,85831 Earthwork
Earth Stripping And StockpilingSoil Stripping And Stockpiling
Topsoil stripping and stockpiling, loam or topsoil,
remove and stockpile on site, 200 HP dozer, 6" deep, 200' haul per S.Y.
2300 S.Y. x $0.76 $1,748.00
GradingFine GradingFine grading, fine grade for slab on grade, machine 2300 S.Y. x $2.92 $6,716.00
Excavation And FillExcavationExcavating, trench backfill, 2-1/4 C.Y. bucket, 100' haul, front end loader, wheel mounted, excludes dewatering
450 L.C.Y. x $7.83 $3,523.50
Excavating, chain trencher, utility trench, common earth, 8" wide, 36" deep, backfill by hand, includes compaction, add
1875 L.F. x $6.54 $12,262.50
FillFill by borrow and utility bedding, borrow, for embankments, 1 mile haul, spread, by dozer
120 L.C.Y. x $35.33 $4,239.60
Backfill, 12" layers, compaction in layers, roller compaction with operator walking, add to above
750 E.C.Y. x $11.68 $8,760.00
Erosion And Sedimentation ControlsStabilization Measures For Erosion And Sedimentation ControlSynthetic erosion control, hay bales, staked 3000 L.F. x $22.20 $66,600.00
Synthetic erosion control, place and remove hay bales 12 Ton x $1,440.79 $17,289.48
$121,139Total Site Development - Service: $1,769,997
C. Site Development - General
[Edit] Description Quantity Unit Unit Cost Subtotal Non Supportable Subtotal
01 General RequirementsConstruction Aids
Equipment MobilizationMobilization or demobilization, dozer, loader, backhoe or excavator, above 150 H.P., up to 50 miles
5 Ea. x $824.50 $4,122.50
Mobilization or demobilization, scraper, self-propelled, 24 C.Y. capacity, up to 50 miles
5 Ea. x $1,231.69 $6,158.45
Temporary Barriers And EnclosuresTemporary FencingTemporary Fencing, chain link, rented up to 12 months, 6' high, 11 ga, over 1000'
3000 L.F. x $11.78 $35,340.00
$45,62103 Concrete
Cast-In-Place ConcreteMiscellaneous Cast-In-Place ConcreteStructural concrete, in place, handicap access ramp (4000 psi), railing both sides, 3' wide, includes forms(4 uses), reinforcing steel, concrete, placing and finishing
120 L.F. x $1,005.90 $120,708.00
$120,70810 Specialties
DirectoriesBuilding DirectoriesDirectory boards, outdoor, weatherproof, black plastic, 36" x 36"
5 Ea. x $3,079.66 $15,398.30
Signage
Dimensional Letter SignageSigns, reflective aluminum street type, double faced, 4-way, includes bracket
3 Ea. x $525.24 $1,575.72
$16,97412 Furnishings
Site FurnishingsManufactured PlantersPlanters, precast concrete, fluted, 7' diameter, 36" high 7 Ea. x $2,989.40 $20,925.80
$20,92632 Exterior Improvements
Schedules For Exterior ImprovementsSchedules For Bases, Ballasts, And PavingSidewalks, driveways, and patios, sidewalk, crushed stone, white marble, 1" thick, excludes base
20000 S.F. x $17.58 $351,600.00
Base CoursesAggregate Base CoursesBase course drainage layers, prepare and roll sub-base, small areas to 2500 S.Y.
2200 S.Y. x $3.55 $7,810.00
$359,410.00Total Site Development - General: $563,639
D. Other Site Development
[Edit] Description Quantity Unit Unit Cost Subtotal Non Supportable Subtotal
Total Other Site Development: $0E. Reconstruction (from JCAF31)
Rm. Type TOP ASF Cost Per ASF Allowance
110 Classroom 0099 General Assignment 0 x $546 $0
110 Classroom 0099 General Assignment 0 x $546 $0
110 Classroom 0099 General Assignment 14,636 x $546 $7,991,256
210 Class Lab0701 Information Technology, General
0 x $879 $0
210 Class Lab0701 Information Technology, General
4,424 x $879 $3,888,696
310 Office 0099 General Assignment 0 x $576 $0
310 Office 0099 General Assignment 0 x $576 $0
310 Office 0099 General Assignment 362 x $576 $208,512
410 Read/Study Room 6120 Library 1,980 x $424 $839,520
530 Audio/Visual, Radio, TV 6130 Media Services 1,263 x $879 $1,110,177
535 A/V, Radio, TV Service 6130 Media Services 0 x $879 $0
715 DP/Computer Service6780 Management Information Services
240 x $569 $136,560
Reconstruction Adjustment: 75% Total: $10,631,041Non Supportable Amt: $0
Total Reconstruction: $10,631,041F. New Construction (from JCAF31)
Rm. Type TOP ASF Cost Per ASF Allowance
Total: $0Non Supportable Amt: $0
Total New Construction: $0G. Board of Governors Energy Policy Allowance
2% of New Building Costs $0 x 2.0% $0 3% of Renovated Building Costs $10,631,041 x 3.0% $318,931
Total Board of Governors Energy Policy Allowance: $318,931H. Other
Non
[Edit] Description Amount SupportableTotal Other Costs: $0
Total Contract Costs: $13,906,7765. Contingency
New Construction $0 x 5.0% $0 Reconstruction $13,906,776 x 7.0% $973,474
Total Contingency: $973,4746. Architectural and Engineering Oversight
New Construction $0 x 8.0% x 25.0% $0 Reconstruction $13,906,776 x 10.0% x 25.0% $347,669
Total Architectural and Engineering Oversight: $347,6697. TESTS AND INSPECTIONS
A. Tests Contract Cost $13,906,776 x 1.0% $139,068
B. DSA Inspections Construction Months 21 x $13,426 $281,946
Total Tests and Inspections Costs: $421,0148. CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT & LABOR COMPLIANCE PROGRAM
A. Construction Management Contract Cost $13,906,776 x 2.0% $278,136
B. Labor Compliance Program (.25% of state project costs) State Project Cost $8,914,782 x 0.25% $22,287
Total Construction Mgt & Labor Compliance Costs: $300,4239. TOTAL CONSTRUCTION (Items 4 through 8)
Total Construction Costs: $15,949,35610.FURNITURE AND GROUP II EQUIPMENT (from JCAF33) 3560
Total Supportable Cost (from JCAF33): $274,625Non Supportable Amt: $0
Total Furniture and Group II Equipment Costs: $274,62511.TOTAL PROJECT COST
Total Project Costs: $17,849,022
12. Project DataOutside
GSFAssignableSquare Feet
RatioASF/GSF
Unit CostPer ASF
Unit CostPer GSF
Construction 0 0 Reconstruction 31,933 22,905 0.72 $619 $333
13. Anticipated Time Schedule Start Preliminary Plans 8/1/2020 Advertise Bid for
Construction 6/1/2022
Start Working Drawings 2/1/2021 Award Construction
Contract 8/1/2022
Complete Working Drawings 8/1/2021 Advertise Bid for
Equipment 6/1/2023
DSA Final Approval 4/1/2022 Complete Project 4/1/2024
6.1 CALIFORNIA ENERGY COMMISSION APPROVED AUDIT
This project will be designed to exceed Title 24, Part 6 Energy Code by 10%, consistent with theBoard of Governors Energy and Sustainability policy. The design should incorporates sustainablegoals for site, energy efficiency, water use reduction, storm water management, occupant health aswell as minimizing the buildings impact on the environment both by design and construction.Strategies will consider:• Natural and native planting materials will be incorporated around the building to minimize, if noteliminate, the irrigation demand.• Concrete walkways will be minimized to reduce storm water runoff and promote natural filtrationinto the soil as well as a reduction in the heat island effect.• Overhangs have been incorporated to shade glazing.• Low E dual glazing will be incorporated to reduce heat gain.• Roofing will incorporate cool roofing to reduce the heat island effect and heat gain.• Heating and cooling will be provided by a highly energy efficient HVAC system.• Independent HVAC controls provided where applicable.• Natural lighting will be incorporated into most spaces.• Energy saving lighting with automatic lighting controls and sensors.• Interior materials will be low in volatile organic compounds, high in recycled content.• Water efficient fixtures, faucets and devices will be incorporated.• A strict recycling program will be required during construction.• Requested participation in the local utility’s energy incentive program.• Photovoltaic panels will be incorporated where appropriate.
• Durable systems and finishes with long life cycles that minimize maintenance and replacement.• Optimization of indoor environmental quality for occupants with high efficiency industrialventilation.• Utilization of environmentally preferable products and processes, such as recycled content materialsand recyclable materials.• Procedures that monitor, trend and report operational performance as compared to the optimaldesign and operating parameters to the campus' central energy management system.
• Space provided in each building to support an active program for recycling and reuse of materials.
STATE OF CALIFORNIA Capital Outlay Budget Change Proposal (COBCP) - Cover Sheet DF-151 (REV 06/17)
Fiscal Year 2020-21
Business Unit 6870
Department Board of Governors, California Community Colleges
Priority No.
Budget Request Name 6870-301-COBCO-2020-XX
Capital Outlay Program ID 5680
Capital Outlay Project ID (7 digits. For new projects leave blank)
Project Title Grossmont-Cuyamaca Community College District, Grossmont College: Liberal Arts/Business/CSIS
Project Status and Type Status: New Continuing Type: Major Minor
Project Category (Select one) CRI (Critical Infrastructure) WSD (Workload Space Deficiencies) ECP (Enrollment Caseload Population) SM (Seismic)
FLS (Fire Life Safety) FM (Facility Modernization) PAR (Public Access Recreation) RC (Resource Conservation)
Total Request (in thousands) $1,626
Phase(s) to be Funded PW
Estimated Total Project Cost (in thousands) $17,850
Budget Request Summary The Liberal Arts/Business/CSIS project on Grossmont College in the Grossmont-Cuyamaca Community College District includes the renovation of buildings 55 Liberal Arts Building South (space inventory #52) and 51 Liberal Arts Building North (space inventory #55), and the reconstruction of 31,933 gross square feet and 22,905 assignable square feet (ASF) comprised of 14,636 ASF lecture, 4,424 ASF lab, 362 ASF office, 1,980 ASF library, 1,263 ASF AV/TV, and 240 ASF other space for the Liberal Arts, Computer Science Information Systems, and Business programs.
Requires Legislation Yes No
Code Section(s) to be Added/Amended/Repealed
CCCI 6596
Requires Provisional Language Yes No
Budget Package Status Needed Not Needed Existing
Impact on Support Budget One-Time Costs Yes No Future Costs Yes No Future Savings Yes No Revenue Yes No
If proposal affects another department, does other department concur with proposal? Yes No Attach comments of affected department, signed and dated by the department director or designee.
Prepared By
Date
Reviewed By
Date
Department Director
Date
Agency Secretary
Date
Department of Finance Use Only Principal Program Budget Analyst
Date submitted to the Legislature
Responses to Specific Requirements of the State Administrative Manual (SAM Narrative)
2
A. Purpose of the Project:
Problem Statement The Liberal Arts/Business/CSIS project on Grossmont College in the Grossmont-Cuyamaca Community College District includes the renovation of buildings 55 Liberal Arts Building South (space inventory #52) and 51 Liberal Arts Building North (space inventory #55), and the reconstruction of 31,933 gross square feet (GSF) and 22,905 assignable square feet (ASF) comprised of 14,636 ASF lecture, 4,424 ASF lab, 362 ASF office, 1,980 ASF library, 1,263 ASF AV/TV, and 240 ASF other space for the Liberal Arts, Computer Science Information Systems (CSIS), and Business programs.
Grossmont College in El Cajon is one of the two colleges in the Grossmont-Cuyamaca Community College District. Established in 1960, the College serves over 18,000 students. The Liberal Arts Quad Complex is a tight cluster of five buildings that house the Liberal Arts, CSIS, and Business programs’ learning spaces (lecture and labs), faculty offices, and support spaces. Two of these five buildings, 55 Liberal Arts Building South (space inventory #52) and 51 Liberal Arts Building North (space inventory #55), constructed in 1964 and 1967, respectively, cannot meet current teaching and learning modalities to best prepare students for success. Specifically: • Both buildings lack flexible learning spaces – hard walls limit the instructors and students abilities
to teach and learn. Progressively, theory and application are blended together, often sharing the same learning spaces to facilitate learning. Inflexible spaces also hinder class sizes, and restrict the ability to teach a variety of different courses. The non-flexible spaces also do not allow for maximum space utilization.
• Existing spaces lack technology – learning tools, such as fixed whiteboards and stationary student stations, do not support modern teaching modalities. Instructional spaces and student learning stations need to support multi-visual and evolving instruction to prepare students. This is especially critical in technical programs such as Computer Science Information Systems (CSIS).
• Current space configurations do not promote collaboration amongst related programs. Student
spaces are not close to faculty spaces for collaboration and related program faculty don’t have adjacencies for streamlined communications.
• There are no small group learning spaces in either building to facilitate learning. Modern
instructional modalities combine small student groups with faculty coaching to solve complex problems and complete projects. Students currently meet elsewhere and don’t benefit from having faculty in close proximity.
Solution Criteria To mitigate these problems, the campus seeks a solution that meets the following criteria:
• Provides flexible spaces for teaching and learning; • Provides spaces that maximize space utilization and adapt to multiple disciplines; • Provides technologically advanced learning spaces that support modern teaching modalities; • Provides computer lab spaces that can be used by different teaching modalities; • Provides learning space and faculty office spaces with adjacencies that promote collaboration and
communication; • Provides small group learning spaces in close proximity to faculty offices; • Provides building infrastructure to support programs and meet community college Title 24 building
codes;
Responses to Specific Requirements of the State Administrative Manual (SAM Narrative)
3
• Is a permanent on-campus solution that does not adversely impact campus’ operational budget or create a transportation hardship for students; and
• Is consistent with the mission the campus’ strategic plan.
B. Relationship to the Strategic Plan:
The College, guided by the District’s 2016-2022 strategic plan and 2013 facilities master plan, is committed to student success. Instructional programs, resources, and strategies are focused on students meeting their educational goals on a timely basis and succeed in their next steps. The strategic and master plans also guide the College in creating and maintaining a campus that is environmentally responsible and sustainable. The campus does not have any known life and safety projects and this project represents the site’s highest state-funded priority.
C. Alternatives: In considering alternatives, the College analyzed options that will meet the primary needs of the campus’ educational and facilities master plans. Alternatives to this project include: • Alternative #1 – Renovate Existing Buildings • Alternative #2 - Lease off-site facilities • Alternative #3 - Acquire temporary modulars on campus Alternative #1 – Renovate Existing Buildings Renovate buildings 55 Liberal Arts Building South (space inventory #52) and 51 Liberal Arts Building North (space inventory #55), and reconstruct with of 31,933 GSF and 22,905 ASF comprised of 14,636 ASF lecture, 4,424 ASF lab, 362 ASF office, 1,980 ASF library, 1,263 ASF AV/TV, and 240 ASF other space. The estimated cost of this alternative at CCI 6596 and EPI 3560 is $17,850,000. Pros: • Provides flexible spaces for teaching and learning; • Provides spaces that maximize space utilization and adapt to multiple disciplines; • Provides technologically advanced learning spaces that support modern teaching modalities; • Provides computer lab spaces that can be used by different teaching modalities; • Provides learning space and faculty office spaces with adjacencies that promote collaboration and
communication; • Provides small group learning spaces with close proximity to faculty; • Provides building infrastructure to support programs and meet community college Title 24 building
codes; • Is a permanent on-campus solution that does not adversely impact campus’ operational budget or
create a transportation hardship for students; • Is consistent with the mission the campus’ strategic plan; and • Is the least cost solution.
Cons: • Possible disruption of current programming during construction.
Responses to Specific Requirements of the State Administrative Manual (SAM Narrative)
4
Alternative #2 – Lease off-site facilities This alternative requires a long-term lease, comprised of 22,905 ASF comprised of 14,636 ASF lecture, 4,424 ASF lab, 362 ASF office, 1,980 ASF library, 1,263 ASF AV/TV, and 240 ASF other space The estimated cost of this alternative at CCI 6596 and EPI 3560 is $37,385,000. The rented space provides adequate parking and security services, and the leased building spaces require the approval of the Division of the State Architect.
Pros: • Provides flexible spaces for teaching and learning; • Provides spaces that maximize space utilization and adapt to multiple disciplines; • Provides technologically advanced learning spaces that support modern teaching modalities; • Provides computer lab spaces that can be used by different teaching modalities; • Provides small group learning spaces; • Provides building infrastructure to support programs and meet community college Title 24 building
codes; Cons: • Does not provide learning space and faculty office spaces with adjacencies that promote
collaboration and communication; • Is not a permanent on-campus solution that does not adversely impact campus’ operational
budget or create a transportation hardship for students; • While this option provides small group learning spaces, not all program related faculty may be
accessible on leased site; • Is inconsistent with the campus’ strategic plan; and • Is not the least cost solution.
Alternative #3 – Acquire temporary modulars on campus This alternative provides space in temporary modulars with 22,905 ASF comprised of 14,636 ASF lecture, 4,424 ASF lab, 362 ASF office, 1,980 ASF library, 1,263 ASF AV/TV, and 240 ASF other space. The estimated cost of this alternative at CCI 6596 and EPI 3560 is $26,922,000.
Pros: • Provides flexible spaces for teaching and learning; • Provides spaces that maximize space utilization and adapt to multiple disciplines; • Provides technologically advanced learning spaces that support modern teaching modalities; • Provides computer lab spaces that can be used by different teaching modalities; • Provides small group learning spaces; • Provides building infrastructure to support programs and meet community college Title 24 building
codes; Cons: • Does not provide learning space and faculty office spaces with adjacencies that promote
collaboration and communication; • While this option provides small group learning spaces, not all faculty may be easily accessible
with program space scattered on campus; • Is not a permanent on-campus solution; • Adversely impacts campus’ operational budget; • Is inconsistent with the campus’ strategic plan; and • Is not the least cost solution.
Responses to Specific Requirements of the State Administrative Manual (SAM Narrative)
5
Solution Criteria Matrix
CRITERIA
Alternative #1 Renovate Existing
Buildings
Alternative #2 Lease Off-Site
Facilities
Alternative #3 Acquire
Temporary Modulars
Provides flexible spaces that support program teaching methodologies
Yes Yes Yes
Provides spaces that adapt to different programs to maximize space utilization
Yes Yes No
Provides the learning spaces technology to prepare students for success
Yes Yes Yes
Provides on-campus adjacencies for program collaboration and streamline communications
Yes No No
Provides small group learning spaces Yes Yes Yes
Meets community college building codes Yes Yes Yes
Does not adversely impact the site’s operations budget
Yes No No
Does not create a transportation hardship for students
Yes No Yes
Is consistent with College Strategic Plan Yes No No
Is the least cost solution Yes No No
Responses to Specific Requirements of the State Administrative Manual (SAM Narrative)
6
Economic Analysis Matrix
ECONOMIC ANALYSIS MATRIX
Alternative #1 Renovate Existing
Buildings*
Alternative #2 Lease Off-Site
Facilities**
Alternative #3 Acquire Temporary
Modulars***
Site Acquisition $0 $0 $0
Plans and Working Drawings $1,626,000 $1,025,000 $6,553,000
Construction Costs:
Utility Service $623,000 $0 $975,000
Site Development-Service $1,770,000 $0 $1,885,000
Site Development-General $564,000 $0 $875,000
Other Site $0 $0 $0
Reconstruction $10,631,000 $0 $0
New Construction $0 $0 $0
Energy Policy Allowance $319,000 $0 $0
Other Construction $0 $0 $0
Construction Soft Costs $2,042,000 $0 $392,000
Total Construction Costs $15,949,000 $0 $4,127,000
Equipment (Group II) $275,000 $275,000 $275,000
Other – Portable or Lease Costs $0 $34,488,000 $15,967,000
Other – Tenant Improvements $0 $1,597,000 $0
Total Project Cost
CCI: 6596 EPI: 3560 $17,850,000 $37,385,000 $26,922,000
Total Costs Escalated CCC Calculates this amount based on latest DOF directions @ CCI: 6596 EPI: 3560
per DOF Budget Letter BL-XXXXX
* Figures Taken from Units and Supporting Costs for the JCAF32 ** $2.25 per gsf per month x gsf x 12 months x 40 years. Tennant Improvements are estimated at $50/gsf
*** Modulars estimated at $250/gsf, 2 Life Cycles
Responses to Specific Requirements of the State Administrative Manual (SAM Narrative)
7
D. Recommended Solution: 1. Which alternative and why?
Alternative # 1, renovate Liberal Arts buildings North and South, and reconstruct with new space design, is the best option because it meets all of the solution criteria. This alternative provides learning, learning support and faculty spaces to best prepare students for successful next steps. The flexible, technologically-advanced spaces support modern teaching and learning modalities, maximize space utilization, and supports small group learning spaces that complement student learning. Located within the existing liberal arts space cluster, this option provides space adjacencies within related programs that promote collaboration and streamline communications. This is also a solution that provides sustainable facilities and infrastructure that supports the instructional program with permanent space, meets Title 24 community colleges building codes, does not adversely impact the site’s operation budget, is the least cost solution, and consistent with the College’s strategic plan.
2. Detailed scope description. This is a Category C project – instructional space modernization. The scope of this project renovates buildings 55 Liberal Arts Building South (space inventory #52) and 51 Liberal Arts Building North (space inventory #55), and reconstructs space of 31,933 GSF and 22,905 ASF comprised of 14,636 ASF lecture, 4.424 ASF lab, 362 ASF office, 1,980 ASF library, 1,263 ASF AV/TV and 240 ASF other space.
Space Type ASF Lecture 14,636 Lab 4,424 Office 362 Library 1,980 AV/TV 1,263 Other 240 Total 22,905
Capacity Load Ratios This project is in the continuum of campus projects that realign instructional and instructional support spaces. Upon project completion, overbuilt lab space will have decreased and the remaining spaces do not exceed State space guidelines.
Space Analysis (ASF):
Type Lecture Lab Office Library AV/TV Other Total
Primary 14,636 4,424 362 1,980 1,263 240 22,905
Secondary -17,532 -4,989 -250 0 -90 0 -22,861
Net -2,896 -565 112 1,980 1,173 240 44
Beg. Cap/Load Ratios (2020) 106.3% 185.4% 98.7% 77.6% 73.9% N/A 105.5%
End. Cap/Load Ratios (2023) 98.5% 177.8% 85.4% 79.4% 82.0% N/A 98.8%
Responses to Specific Requirements of the State Administrative Manual (SAM Narrative)
8
3. COBCP Abstract: (Liberal Arts/Business/CSIS – $17,850,000 for Preliminary Plans, Working Drawings, Construction, and Equipment). The project includes the renovation of 55 Liberal Arts Building South (space inventory #52) and 51 Liberal Arts Building North (space inventory #55). Total project costs are estimated at $17,850,000, including preliminary plans ($800,000), working drawings ($826,000), construction ($15,949,000) and equipment ($275,000). Preliminary plans will begin August 2020 and be completed in January 2021. The working drawings are estimated to begin in February 2021 and be completed in April 2022. Construction is scheduled to begin August 2022 and will be completed in January 2024. The District is contributing 50% toward state-supportable project costs.
4. Basis for cost information. The architect for this project, using cost guidelines provided by the State Chancellor’s Office, engineering data based upon the building specifications, and professional cost estimating, has provided the cost estimates.
This project will be designed to exceed Title 24, Part 6 Energy Code by 10%, consistent with the Board of Governors Energy and Sustainability policy. The design incorporates sustainable goals for site, energy efficiency, water use reduction, storm water management, occupant health as well as minimizing the building’s impact on the environment both by design and construction. Strategies will consider:
• Natural and native planting materials will be incorporated around the building to minimize, if
not eliminate, the irrigation demand; • Concrete walkways will be minimized to reduce storm water runoff and promote natural
filtration into the soil as well as a reduction in the heat island effect; • Overhangs have been incorporated to shade glazing; • Low E dual glazing will be incorporated to reduce heat gain; • Roofing will incorporate cool roofing to reduce the heat island effect and heat gain; • Heating and cooling will be provided by a highly energy efficient HVAC system; • Independent HVAC controls provided where applicable; • Natural lighting will be incorporated into most spaces; • Energy saving lighting with automatic lighting controls and sensors; • Interior materials will be low in volatile organic compounds, high in recycled content; • Water efficient fixtures, faucets and devices will be incorporated; • A strict recycling program will be required during construction; • Requested participation in the local utility’s energy incentive program; and • Photovoltaic panels will be incorporated where appropriate.
5. Factors/benefits for recommended solution other than the least expensive alternative. The project presents the least cost solution.
6. Complete description of impact on support budget. While spaces are realigned in this project with minimal ASF grown, no certificated or classified staff changes are anticipated. Maintenance and energy costs, due to more efficient and sustainable building and operational systems, are expected to decrease. Please see 9.1 Analysis of Future Costs in this proposal for a detailed discussion.
7. Identify and explain any project risks. No known risks have been identified for this project at this time.
Responses to Specific Requirements of the State Administrative Manual (SAM Narrative)
9
8. List requested interdepartmental coordination and/or special project approval (including mandatory reviews and approvals, e.g. technology proposals). • Division of the State Architect and the State Fire Marshall review for structural safety, access
compliance and fire life safety plan and field reviews. • State Public Works Board approval of preliminary plans.
E. Consistency with Government Code Section 65041.1:
Consistent with the provisions of AB 857, Chapter 1016, Statutes of 2002, the California Community Colleges are exempt from these specific provisions of this legislation.
F. Attachments: 1. Project Cost Estimate (Quantity & Unit Costs) 2. JCAF31 3. JCAF32 4. JCAF33 5. Equipment List 6. Schematic Drawings 7. Energy Participation Letter 8. Fiscal Impact Worksheet 9. Other
8.1 CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACTENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT
(Reference: California Code of Regulations, Title 5, Section 57121)
It has been determined that a Negative Declaration will apply to this project. This declaration will be submitted to the appropriate agencies for approval prior to the submission of the Preliminary Plans to the Chancellors Office.
9.1 ANALYSIS OF FUTURE COSTS
Provide an economic analysis of additional instructional, administrative, and maintenance cost resulting from the proposed project, including personnel years. Disclose all new courses or programs to be housed in the projectthat may need Chancellor’s Office review.
Personnel Costs
Certificated:
Classified:
Depreciation, Maintenance, and Operation:
Program/Course/Service Approvals: List all new programs/courses/services to be housed in this project or its secondary effects and give the date of approval. If there are not new programs/courses/services for which approvalis required, please so state. This is not required for equipment-only projects.
Name of New Program/Course/Service Date of Approval
No new programs
This is a renovation of two exsisting buildings with minimal asf growth (44 asf). There will be no need for additional certificated staff.
This is a renovation of two exsisting buildings with minimal asf growth (44 asf). There will be no need for additional classified staff.
Since this is a renovation of two existing building, energy efficiency measures will help reduce the energy cost per square foot over the current building. Maintenance and operations costs are estimated at $9.00 per net GSF (31,933 GSF) and will be approximately $287,000 per year in additional utilities, supplies and materials expenditures.
2018 Liberal Arts/Business/CSIS | Grossmont-Cuyamaca Community College District, Grossmont Campus
Page 10’
N
400’500’ 200’
OVERALL SITE PLAN
2018 Liberal Arts/Business/CSIS | Grossmont-Cuyamaca Community College District, Grossmont Campus
Page 20’
N
100’150’ 50’
SITE PLAN
Page 3Scale: 1/32” = 1’-0”
N
2018 Liberal Arts/Business/CSIS | Grossmont-Cuyamaca Community College District, Grossmont Campus
BUILDING 51
DP
Page 4Scale: 1/32” = 1’-0”
N
2018 Liberal Arts/Business/CSIS | Grossmont-Cuyamaca Community College District, Grossmont Campus
BUILDING 55
DP
Page 5Scale: 1/32” = 1’-0”
N
2018 Liberal Arts/Business/CSIS | Grossmont-Cuyamaca Community College District, Grossmont Campus
BUILDING 51 ELEVATIONS
Page 6Scale: 1/32” = 1’-0”
N
2018 Liberal Arts/Business/CSIS | Grossmont-Cuyamaca Community College District, Grossmont Campus
BUILDING 55 ELEVATIONS
* Indicates manual override
JCAF 33- Liberal Arts/Business/CSIS (Grossmont College/Grossmont-Cuyamaca CCD) (Official) EPI: 3560 (12/17)3560 (12/17) Rm. Type Description TOP No. Department
No. Rms
No. Sta
Room No. ASF
Sec. ASF
Increase In Space
Equip Cost Per ASF
Total Allowable
Cost
110-115 Classroom 0099-4999 14,636 -17,532 -2,896 $16.65 $0
210 Class Lab 0701 Information Technology, General 4,424 -4,989 -565 $242.00 $0
300 - 355 Faculty Offices 0099 - 4999 362 -250 112 $26.03 $2,915
410-420 Library - Reading and Stack Space 6110, 6120 1,980 1,980 $39.06 $77,339
530-535 Audio Visual Arts 6130 1,263 -90 1,173 $116.19 $136,291
710-715 Data Processing/Computer Lab 0000-9600 240 240 $242.00 $58,080
Totals: 22,905 -22,861 44 $274,625
CFIS #: 40.19.XXX
12.1 - Justification For Additional Costs Exceeding Guidelines
District: Grossmont-Cuyamaca Community College District Project:College: Grossmont College Date: August 1, 2018
Construction Equipment
Liberal Arts/Business/CSIS
There are no known additional costs for this project. The Quantities and Unit Costs contains all of the costs associated with this project.
District: Grossmont-Cuyamaca Community College District
Project: Liberal Arts/Business/CSIS College: Grossmont College August 1, 2018 EPI 3560
Rm # Room Description Item Description 1 Units Unit Cost Total Cost
Less Existing
Inventory 2
Total New Equipment
Needed
Faculty OfficeBox File Cabinet 8 $445 $3,558 $3,558
Lateral File Cabinet 8 $445 $3,558 $3,558Upper Cabinets 8 $556 $4,447 $4,447
Computer 4 $3,335 $13,342 $13,342Desktop Printer 4 $556 $2,224 $2,224
Telephone 4 $556 $2,224 $2,224Workstation 4 $1,668 $6,671 $6,671
Bookcases 36" Ht 8 $389 $3,113 $3,113Staff Task Chair 4 $556 $2,224 $2,224
Guest Chair 8 $389 $3,113 $3,113
Study Room
Round Table 20 $1,223 $24,460 $24,460
Student Chair 60 $445 $26,683 $26,683
Instructors Table 2 $556 $1,112 $1,112
Instructors Chair 2 $556 $1,112 $1,112
Instructors Computer 2 $3,335 $6,671 $6,671
Instructors Smart Workstation 2 $2,668 $5,337 $5,337
AV Interface Control System 2 $1,668 $3,335 $3,335
Printer/Copier/Scanner/FAX 3 $1,779 $5,337 $5,337
LCD Projector 2 $2,224 $4,447 $4,447
Sound System 2 $1,668 $3,335 $3,335
Visual Presenter 2 $2,668 $5,337 $5,337
Distance Education
Student Chair 60 $445 $26,683 $26,683
10' Table 20 $667 $13,342 $13,342
Instructors Table 4 $556 $2,224 $2,224
Instructors Chair 4 $556 $2,224 $2,224
Instructors Computer 4 $2,780 $11,118 $11,118
Printer/Copier/Scanner/FAX 2 $1,779 $3,558 $3,558
Instructors Smart Workstation 4 $2,668 $10,673 $10,673
AV Interface Control System 4 $1,668 $6,671 $6,671
LCD Projector 4 $2,224 $8,894 $8,894
Sound System 2 $1,668 $3,335 $3,335
Visual Presenter 2 $2,668 $5,337 $5,337
Distance Education System 2 $26,683 $53,367 $53,367
Grand Total $279,063 $279,063
13.1 - Detailed Equipment List