Date post: | 05-Jul-2018 |
Category: |
Documents |
Upload: | truonghanh |
View: | 213 times |
Download: | 0 times |
Rwanda Civil Society Mapping – Final Report
i
FINAL REPORT
CIVIL SOCIETY
MAPPING (UNDP RWANDA).
(RFP-58951-2010-017)
RWANDA CIVIL SOCIETY PLATFORM
Draft – 18 August 2011
Rwanda Civil Society Mapping – Final Report
ii
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Abbreviations and Glossary ...................................................................................... iv Executive Summary .................................................................................................... 1 1.0 Background ........................................................................................................ 1
1.1 Understanding Civil Society Organizations .................................................... 1 1.2 Characteristics of CSOs ................................................................................. 3 1.3 Rwandan Civil Society ................................................................................... 4 1.5 Registration of CSOs in Rwanda – Legal Framework .................................... 5 1.6 Registration of CSOs in Rwanda – The Practice ............................................ 9 1.7 Registration and Regulation of CSOs – the Way Forward ............................ 10
2.0 Objectives and Tasks ....................................................................................... 12 2.1 Objectives of the CSO Mapping Study ......................................................... 12 2.2 Expected Results & Actual Results .............................................................. 12 2.3 Additional aspects ........................................................................................ 14
3.0 Approach .......................................................................................................... 14 3.1 – Key Benchmarks ....................................................................................... 15
4.0 Methodology ..................................................................................................... 15 4.1 Methodological Approach Employed ............................................................ 16 4.2 Approach to Data Collection ........................................................................ 17 4.3 Organisation of Data .................................................................................... 18 4.4 District Visits ................................................................................................ 20 4.5 Data verification from donors ....................................................................... 21 4.6 Data Verification .......................................................................................... 22 4.7 National Level .............................................................................................. 22 4.8 Structured Interview Tool ............................................................................. 23 4.9 Analysis ....................................................................................................... 23 4.10. Draft Report & Validation ........................................................................ 25
5.0 analysis of results - overview .......................................................................... 25 Table 1 – EDPRS sectors................................................................................... 25 Table 2 – Analysis of CSO Expenditure by EDPRS Sector ................................. 26 Graph 1 - % of Total CSO investments by EDPRS Sector .................................. 27 Table 3 – Analysis of CSO Relative Expenditure by EDPRS Sector by
International and Local CSOs ...................................................................... 28 Graph 2 - CSO Relative Expenditure by EDPRS Sector by International
and Local CSOs .......................................................................................... 28 6.1 Relative CSO vs. Government Expenditure ................................................. 30 Table 4 – Comparison of CSO and Government of Rwanda Sectoral
Expenditure – FY 2009/2010 ....................................................................... 30 Graph 3 - CSO and Government of Rwanda Sectoral Expenditure – FY
2009/2010 ................................................................................................... 31 Table 5 –Sectoral CSO Expenditure FY 2009/2010 Exceeds 20% Total
National Expenditure ................................................................................... 32 6.2 Relative CSO by District............................................................................... 32 Table 6 – Relative Total Sectoral CSO Expenditure FY 2009/2010 per
District ......................................................................................................... 34 Graph 4 – Relative Sectoral Expenditure CSOs FY 2009/2010 per District ........ 35
7.0 EDPRS 1 – General Public Service ................................................................. 36 Graph 5 – CSO Expenditure EDPRS 1 – General Public Service ....................... 36
Rwanda Civil Society Mapping – Final Report
iii
8.0 EDPRS 2 – Defense .......................................................................................... 36 9.0 EDPRS 3 – Public Order and Safety ................................................................ 37
Graph 6 – CSO Expenditure EDPRS 3 – Public Order and Safety ..................... 37 10.0 EDPRS 4 – environmental protection ............................................................. 37
Graph 7– CSO Expenditure EDPRS 4 – Environmental Protection .................... 38 11.0 EDPRS 5 – Agriculture ..................................................................................... 38
Graph 8– CSO Expenditure EDPRS 5 - Agriculture............................................ 38 12.0 EDPRS 6 – Industry and Commerce ............................................................... 39
Graph 9– CSO Expenditure EDPRS 6 – Industry and Commerce ...................... 39 13.0 EDPRS 7 – Fuel and Energy ............................................................................ 39
Graph 9– CSO Expenditure EDPRS 7 – Fuel and Energy .................................. 39 14.0 EDPRS 8 – Fuel and energy ............................................................................. 40 15.0 EDPRS 9 – Land Housing & Community Amenities ...................................... 40
Graph 10– CSO Expenditure EDPRS 9 – land Housing & Community Amenities .................................................................................................... 40
16.0 EDPRS 10 – Water and Sanitation ................................................................... 40 Graph 11– CSO Expenditure EDPRS 10 – Water & Sanitation .......................... 40
17.0 EDPRS 11 – Youth Culture & Sports ............................................................... 41 Graph 12– CSO Expenditure EDPRS 11 – Youth Culture & Sports .................... 41
18.0 EDPRS 12 – Education ..................................................................................... 41 Graph 13– CSO Expenditure EDPRS 12 - Education ......................................... 42
19.0 EDPRS 13 – Health ........................................................................................... 42 Graph 14– CSO Expenditure EDPRS 13 - Health .............................................. 43
20.0 EDPRS 14 – Social protection ......................................................................... 44 Graph 15– CSO Expenditure EDPRS 14 – Social Protection ............................. 44
21.0 CHALLENGES AND RECOMMENDATIONS .................................................... 44 22.0 CONCLUSIONS ................................................................................................. 46 Annex 1 Terms of Reference .................................................................................... 48 Annex 2 Interview questionnaire .............................................................................. 52 Annex 3 EDPRS 1 – General Public Service ............................................................ 55 Annex 4 EDPRS 3 – Public )rder and Safety ............................................................ 60 Annex 5 EDPRS 4 – Environmental Protection ....................................................... 64 Annex 6 EDPRS 5 – Agriculture ............................................................................... 67 Annex 7 EDPRS 6 – Industry and Commerce .......................................................... 74 Annex 8 EDPRS 7 – Fuel and Energy ....................................................................... 75 Annex 9 EDPRS 8 – Transport and Communications ............................................. 75 Annex 10 EDPRS 9 – Land Housing and Community Amenitied ........................... 76 Annex 11 EDPRS 10 – Water and Sanitation ........................................................... 78 Annex 12 EDPRS 11 – Youth Culture and Sports .................................................. 80 Annex 13 EDPRS 12 – Health ................................................................................... 82 Annex 14 EDPRS 13 – Education ............................................................................. 98 Annex 15 EDPRS 14 – Social protection ............................................................... 108
Rwanda Civil Society Mapping – Final Report
iv
ABBREVIATIONS AND GLOSSARY
ACU Aid Coordination Unit
CASE Community assisted Access to Sustainable Energy
CAVA Communities Allied against Violence and AIDS Project
CCOAIB Le Conseil de Concertation des Organisations d'Appui aux Initiatives de Base
CEJP Commission Episcopale Justice et Paix
CESTRAR Centrale des Syndicats des Travailleurs du Rwanda
CLADHO Rwandan Collective of Leagues and Associations for the Defense of Human Rights
COSMO Community Support and Mentoring for Orphans and other vulnerable
children/youth
CSO Community Based Organization
CSOs Civil Society Organization
CWASA: Community Based Water and Sanitation
ECD Early Childhood Development Project
EDPR Economic Development and Poverty Reduction Strategy
EEEGL Enterprise, Environment and Equity in the Virunga Landscape of the Great Lakes
FDI Foreign Direct Investment
FOFI Farmers of the Future Initiative
GDP Gross Domestic Product
GLAI Great Lakes Advocacy Initiative
GOR Government of Rwanda
HU USAID/Higa Ubeho
IBUKA IBUKA Mémoire & Justice
INGO International Non Governmental Organisation
LIBRAP Literacy and Basic Right Awareness
LNGO Local Non Governmental Organisation
MDG Millennium Development Goals
MTEF Medium Term Expenditure Framework
MINALOC Ministry of Local Government and Social. Affairs
MINECOFIN Ministry of Finance and Economic Development
MINEDUC Ministry of Education
MINISANTE Ministry of Health
PPIMA Public Policy Information Monitoring and Advocacy
RCL Roddom Consult Limited
RCSP Rwanda Civil Society Platform
RI Social Change for Family Planning Results Initiative
SAFI Sustainable Access to Financial Services for Investment
TOR Terms of Reference
UN United Nations
UNDP United Nations Development Programme
Rwanda Civil Society Mapping – Final Report
1
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
The overall objectives of the Civil Society Mapping Study were to contribute to -
a. Increased understanding of the impacts of the civil society activities in Rwanda
through aggregating the CSOs activities;
b. Harmonized distribution of activities by the CSOs and coordinated activities and
programmes through mapping out the activities sector by sector;
c. Informed future planning processes of the CSOs and required funding through
assessing the gaps currently exist;
d. Informing better the Government and RCSP planning process by quantifying the
CSO contribution in the national estimates;
e. Quantify the CSO contribution in the national estimates;
f. Use the information generated from the study to form the basis of the lobby
and advocacy; and
g. To assess where CSOs have a comparative advantage so that in its
complementary role with the government, the latter comes in where there is a
gap to fill. This complementary role will enhance specialization in different
sectors by different stakeholders.
The expected results were –
Mapping of the activities of the CSOs in all the districts of Rwanda, detailing out
the domains of intervention and the pattern of distribution;
CSO funding information for both local and international CSOs;
Assess activities and source of funding;
Meet members of the civil society district by district to discuss their programs,
funding opportunities available, challenges, best practices and way forward;
Document results and impacts of CSO activities;
Work out details of the employment statistics within individual organizations
constituting the CSOs;
Gather qualitative information on the activities of organizations working in
governance, advocacy and human rights; and
Help organize and moderate a user workshop to present and discuss the draft
report at a national workshop of members and stakeholders and to validate the
Rwanda Civil Society Mapping – Final Report
2
draft report.
Not all of these expected results could be achieved, especially in terms of impacts of
CSO activities and employment statistics. There were many reasons for this occurring –
The data held by many of the CSOs is partial and non-descriptive.
Many CSOs do not have activity plans; those that have activity plans often do
not necessarily budget all activities separately.
CSOs generally do not have baseline surveys or impact surveys that allow for
impact determination.
CSOs do not plan and implement activities sectorally, in that most CSOs
undertake activities that have cross-sectoral impacts. Such an approach crosses
many sectors and the definition of what sector they are engaged in and what is
the expected impact are often not described.
CSOs operate on differing financial years – some use a calendar year; others the
government of Rwanda FY and others the financial year of their donor funding
source. It becomes very difficult to assess impacts within comparable periods.
For CSOs with multiple major donors, records are often kept in differing
fashions according to funding requirements. Many donors mandate the use of
their own planning, budgeting and reporting systems. This is both a major
burden on CSOs and also makes comparison and data collection very difficult.
The CSO mapping was undertaken under the direct supervision of the RSCP and in
close collaboration with the Aid Coordination Unit (ACU) of the United Nations in
Rwanda. Data was collected from the Ministry of Local Government (MINALOC) and
the Directorate of Immigration which was then cross checked through CSOs, donors
and field visits. While the data may not be complete, as errors are always possible, this
mapping represents the best available information at this time.
In order to be useful as a report, the data was ordered and analysed to examine the
various CSO contributions to economic development and poverty reduction by
reference to the goals, strategies and indicators of Vision 2020 and the Economic
Development and Poverty Reduction Strategy (EDPRS). This places the various
Rwanda Civil Society Mapping – Final Report
3
contributions within a common structured framework that can be understood by all
stakeholders. It was against this framework that all CSO activities were analysed to
determine which sector the CSO activities fell within.
The total of CSO expenditure in Rwanda is substantial: in FY 2009-2010 it approached
RWF 254,833,597,195 (or US$428,291,760). The majority of the funds expended by
CSOs in Rwanda are overwhelmingly concentrated (88.99%) in the four sectors of
health (29.74%), education (21.08%), social protection (22.83%) and agriculture
(15.34%). While there are definitional issues in respect of the allocation of activity
expenditure to sectors, the majority of those allocation issues related to multi-purpose
expenditures (e.g. education expenditure on health related matters) within these four
sectors and misallocation of expenditure is not a substantive issue.
International CSOs expended the most substantial portion of the funds expended in
any sector, and overall, expended 75.9% of all CSO expenditure in Rwanda. In seven
EDPRS secors, total CSO expenditure exceeded 20% of total government expenditure.
Sectoral CSO Expenditure FY 2009/2010 Exceeds 20% Total National Expenditure
EDPRS Sector CSO Expenditure % Total
04 ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION 22%
05 AGRICULTURE 41%
09 LAND HOUSING & COMMUNITY AMENITIES 22%
11 YOUTH CULTURE AND SPORTS 33%
12 HEALTH 46%
13 EDUCATION 24%
14 SOCIAL PROTECTION 60%
This clearly indicates the need for central government interaction with CSOs in respect
of the prioritization of sectoral expenditure within sectors as the level of CSO
expenditure in these sectors is a substantial proportion of the total sectoral
expenditure. This level of interaction is not evident today. Further, this also clearly
demonstrates the importance of CSOs in Rwanda in terms of overall service delivery
within the key EDPRS sectors. Given that CSOs in Rwanda have this level of
Rwanda Civil Society Mapping – Final Report
4
expenditure in terms of overall national expenditure in the key EDPRS sectoral areas, it
is recommended that the government give close and further consideration to the
formalization of interaction with CSOs on a continuing basis in order that key sectoral
investments are effectively addressed.
There is a great disparity in overall CSO expenditure by district. Gasabo (11.56%),
Bugesera (11.51%) and Kayonza (10.18%) have attracted CSO expenditure across all
sectors at rates that exceed what could normally be expected and between the three
districts account for 33.25% of all CSO expenditure across all districts. The
recommendation for consideration is that on a sectoral basis, when making district
allocations for programmes, that CSOs be advised to follow the relevant sector
strategic plans which have identified relative district needs. While this may even out
funding approaches in the future, this is not certain as it may well be that the
combined effect of all of the sector strategic plans is to result in heightened allocations
to these three districts.
A series of challenges were noted that hindering the smooth running of the overall
administration of CSOs in Rwanda. They are –
(a) Poor reporting mechanisms and schedules where by periodical reports are
supposed to be submitted to the JADF and MINALOC/IMMIGRATION but are actually
not submitted. This causes a supervision bottlenecks and poor coordination of their
activities.
(b) There is a facilitation problem both in terms of transport and communication. This
makes it difficult for the JADF PS to effectively monitor and coordinate the activities of
all CSOs operating in districts where they are in charge.
(c) There is an issue of the JADFs feeling unempowered and lacking authority in the
execution of their work. This results in them not considering that they are able to even
bring the CSO heads together in times of need in order to streamline the operations of
CSOs.
(d) There is no clear communication mechanism between MINALOC and district JADFs
and this leads to a situation where CSOs are registered at MINALOC but are not known
at the district where they operate.
Rwanda Civil Society Mapping – Final Report
5
(e) There is also no clear monitoring and evaluation mechanism of the CSO activities
from MINALOC down to the district level and Umurenge level. There is no frame work
within which the activities of these CSOs can be monitored.
(f) There is also challenge of the legal framework in respect of CSO registration and
operation. This has been dealt with elsewhere.
(g) For local CSOs, there is no steady stream of income and this makes their employees
work as volunteers.
The recommendations are-
1. That the CSO registration process be changed so that it undertaken through the
Development Assistance Database so that all CSO information is captured annually as
part of the annual registration process. This will annually update all data relating to
activates and areas of focus and will be a valuable tool for all stakeholders when
determining their selection of sectoral investments.
2. That the implementation laws necessary to implement the CSO organic law be
drafted and passed as soon as reasonably practicable so as to capture the hanged
registration process.
3. Further investigations be undertaken to determine the value for money in terms of
sectoral investments by CSOs against the respective level of central government.
4. Increase/deepen CSO involvement in the Sector Working Groups (SWGs).
5. JADFs do not feel empowered, they are weak by perception and therefore they
should be strengthened in order for them to effectively execute their duties. An
example here is the feeling of being powerless to ask for periodical reports. This is an
issue that was raised by the JADFs.
6. Improve on facilitation of the JADFs to improve coordination, monitoring and
evaluation. This is interms of transport and communication.
The CSO mapping exercise has not been definitive as it was not a census. There are
CSOs that have not been captured and there may well be classification issues in
respect of overall expenditure. However, it is clear that the recommendations in
respect of the gathering of accurate annual data in respect of CSOs must be a priority
Rwanda Civil Society Mapping – Final Report
6
matter for central government given the overall level of expenditure by CSOs in some
of the priority sectors.
The importance of this exercise for CSOs themselves in Rwanda is that the data
provided by this CSO mapping exercise demonstrates very clearly the importance of
civil society in service delivery in vital sectors within Rwanda and CSOs are to be seen
as major stakeholders in the overall development agenda. CSOs will be able to use this
data to further their discussions and interactions with development partners and
central government in terms of enhancing the focus and relevance of their activities.
Further work is required in respect of the value for money that CSOs bring to the
development agenda in Rwanda. The scope of this mapping exercise demonstrates the
importance of CSOs, but not whether they represent value for money in terms of their
activities. This can only be done by a sectoral approach which compares the activities
of central and local governments to comparable CSO activities in the each sector. This
mapping exercise offers no comment on this aspect because it was a matter that was
well outside the scope of the exercise, but this is an area that requires substantial
further consideration and is one that should be undertaken jointly by CSOs and
government to determine those areas of activity where there are advantages for
activities to be undertaken by the stakeholders.
Rwanda Civil Society Mapping – Final Report
1
1.0 BACKGROUND
1.1 Understanding Civil Society Organizations
Every community has its own distinct forms of social organization, cultural and political
traditions, as well as contemporary state and economic structures – all of which are
central to the development of civil society and shape its specific features. In Rwanda,
the organic nature of civil society formation makes it appear elusive, complex and in
some cases contested. As a result there are different meanings and interpretations
and, over time, different schools of thought have influenced theoretical debates and
empirical research. However, the concept of civil society refers to the web of social
relations that exist in the space between the state, the market (activities with the aim
of extracting profit), and the private life of families and individuals. Interlinked with the
concept of civil society is the idea of social capital: the values, traditions and networks
that enable coordination and cooperation between people. Civil Society Organisations
(CSOs), therefore involves the groupings that have qualities associated with
relationships, with values, and with organizational forms.
There have been various operational definitions for CSOs because they range from
officially constituted institutions to small, informal community groups and these
associations give expression and direction to the social-economic, political, spiritual
and cultural needs of members. Therefore, the definition of CSOs varies from one
country to the other. However, commonalities can be found in the nature and function
of CSOs. Some definitions of CSOs are useful to consider -
Definition 1: The UNDP has defined CSOs as one the three spheres of interference in
the making of democratic societies. Civil society is the sphere in which social
movements become organized. The organizations of civil society, which represent
many diverse and sometimes contradictory social interests, are shaped to fit their
social base, constituency, thematic organizations (e.g. environment, gender, human
rights) and types of activity. In Rwanda, these have included church related groups,
trade unions, cooperatives, service organizations (NGOs), community groups (CSOs)
and youth organizations as well as academic institutions.
Rwanda Civil Society Mapping – Final Report
2
Definition 2: The World Bank Social Development Department Sustainable
Development Network Report (2006) defined CSOs as the wide array of non-
governmental and not for-profit organizations that have a presence in public life,
expressing the interests and values of their members or others, based on ethical,
cultural, political, scientific, religious or philanthropic considerations. The term goes
beyond the narrower (and to many donors, more familiar) category of development-
oriented NGOs and depicts a broad range of organizations, such as community groups,
women‘s association, labor unions, indigenous groups, youth groups, charitable
organizations, foundations, faith-based organizations, independent media,
professional associations, think tanks, independent educational organizations and
social movements.
Definition 3: CIVICUS defines CSOs as the arena between family, government and
market where people voluntarily associate to advance their common interest.
Definition 4: Academics have defined CSOs as those informal, semiformal or formal
organizational formations that protect, promote and facilitate principles and practices
of democracy, participation, pluralism, rights, equity, justice and peace and among the
people locally, nationally or internationally. Such CSOs plays an ethical and political
role within the society in attempts to humanize an increasingly dehumanized world.
They also function outside the conventional spaces of state power and market forces,
though they constantly negotiate, pressurize and persuade the institutions of the state
as well as the market to be more responsible and responsive to the needs and rights of
the people in general and the marginalized poor in particular.
From the brief elaborations above, therefore, it is possible to understand that there is
a wide range of definitions attached to the notion of civil society among contemporary
scholars of the subject. A succinct operational definition of CSOs in this context includes
all non-state actors excluding the market. In other words CSOs in the Rwandan context
are those formal organisations or institutions existing in the intermediary space
between the states on the one hand and the lowest unit of social life, the family, on the
other. Moreover they organize with specific objectives to construct common benefits
and promote the interest of their constituency or beneficiaries. Thus, CSOs should
ideally combine NGOs, trade unions, professional associations, interest groups, mass
Rwanda Civil Society Mapping – Final Report
3
organizations (youth, women and other groups associations), as well as community
based organizations.
1.2 Characteristics of CSOs
Autonomy: Political and sociological definitions of CSOs agree on the centrality of
autonomy as a CSO characteristic, and this is usually referred to as the freedom and
independence of civil organizations to set their own agenda without the direct
intervention or dictation from external forces, especially the state. In reality CSOs exist
not in a vacuum but in historical, political, and socio-economic contexts and their
autonomy is circumscribed by these contextual factures. Autonomy may, therefore, be
relative: a matter of degree and subject to negative or positive change. Furthermore,
CSOs interact with other organized social forces including donor communities and
other civic organizations, which circumscribe and limit their ability to act
independently.
Voluntarism: CSOs vary from small membership organizations, mainly engaged in self-
help activities, to large and medium scale organizations engaged in all sorts of service,
development and advocacy activities. Accordingly, they exhibit differences in their
style of organization, internal democracy, and level of membership participation. The
self image of CSOs as democratic, participatory and accountable needs close
inspection. However, voluntary membership and participation is one of the important
characteristics and principles of CSOs.
Plurality: The notion of plurality indicates not only the large number and types of
associations and organizations occupying the sphere but also the diversity of interest
objectives, organizational forms and capacities. Academics have noted that civil society
is not a uniform and homogeneous group of institutes. On the contrary, the
institutions of CSOs are myriad of particular interests, which have an institutional form
or an institutional expression. They express conflicts, rivalries, and struggles – or
consented action. They may act as integrating or disintegrating elements.
Rwanda Civil Society Mapping – Final Report
4
Trust and solidarity: Trust and solidarity refers to the reciprocal mutuality and
confidence individual members place on the reliability of the behaviour and actions of
fellow members. As civic associations grow in size and complexity, trust and solidarity
become diluted and assume more abstract and remote characteristics.
1.3 Rwandan Civil Society
Rwandan Civil Society has been in existence from 1956 when its first segments were
established in form of farmers associations who were answerable to the church. It
grew to sizable proportions when several associations, Community Based
Organizations (CSOs), Non-Government Organizations (NGOs), formed umbrellas that
brought together NGOs and CSOs with common interest.
This organizational set up left Community Service Organizations (CSOs) deprived of the
capacity to coordinate and engage with different partners .This gap made the CSOs not
only perceived as weak but also vulnerable. Motivated by a desire to combine their
efforts to contribute to the integral development of the country and promotion of the
rule of law, 8 umbrellas (listed below) initiated the idea of setting up a platform that
would enable them to achieve their mission. These include;
Le Conseil de Concertation des Organisations d'Appui aux Initiatives de Base
(CCOAIB),
Centrale des Syndicats des Travailleurs du Rwanda (CESTRAR),
Rwandan Collective of Leagues and Associations for the Defence of Human
Rights (CLADHO),
IBUKA Mémoire & Justice,
the Union IMBARAGA,
Commission Episcopale Justice et Paix (CEJP),
THE PRESS HOUSE, and
PRO-FEMMES TWESE HAMWE.
Thereafter, seven other umbrellas and organization networks became members. This
was realized at the Constituent Assembly held on July 9, 2004 when CSO members
came together and formed the Rwanda Civil Society Platform-(RCSP) that brings
together all actors of the civil society. It was created as a framework for exchange and
Rwanda Civil Society Mapping – Final Report
5
dialogue between member organizations and between the latter and their partners.
The RCSP’s mission is to serve as a framework for dialogue, reflection on common
issues, information exchange, mutual support and reinforcement and build a valid
interlocutor to various partners of the civil society. The objectives of the RCSP are;
a. Promote solidarity and harmonize relations between civil society organizations;
b. Analyze the context and challenges the population of Rwanda has faced and /or
is facing with a view to adopt common position and strategy for specific
actions;
c. Establish and maintain an information and communication system to enable
the civil society to achieve its mission in close collaboration with all partners;
d. Develop an effective partnership at national, regional and international levels;
e. Perform the representation and advocacy mandate of the Civil Society.
Despite the establishment of the RSCP, organizations and umbrella activities remained
individualized and isolated and their location, nature and, quantities remained
unknown. This made the civil society overall contribution to national development
shrouded in mystery and hence the doubt of the usefulness of the CSO as
development partners.
The survey is to map out civil society activities, areas of intervention, and their
quantities to assess and consider the prevailing concern of the relevance and role of
the civil society in national economic development and poverty reduction. This will not
only help the RSCP but also the government and Development Partners by providing
useful overview of the support and activities undertaken by CSOs. This will include
activities undertaken by Local NGOs (LNGOs) and those International NGOs (INGOs)
that implement activities at the grassroots.
1.5 Registration of CSOs in Rwanda – Legal Framework
The registration of CSOs in Rwanda is controlled by two laws; Law N° 20/2000 of 27
July 2000 Relating to Non-profit Making Organizations and Law N° 55/2008 of 10 July
2008 Governing Non-Governmental Organisations.
Rwanda Civil Society Mapping – Final Report
6
Law No 55/2008 is a short law but is meant to operate as an organic law that requires
other implementing to be passed and until that is passed, Law No 20/2000 continues
to operate. Law 55/2008 was promulgated on 10 September 2008 and governs non-
governmental organisations, which are organizations not established by the
Government but which work for the general interest, which in turn is defined as
activities carried out by physical persons or legal entities that gather their skills and
efforts in order to promote the population’s social welfare. Non-governmental
organizations operating in Rwanda are categorized as follows:
local non-governmental organizations;
international non-governmental organizations; and
religious organizations.
A specific law is required to determine the organization and functioning of each
category, but no laws have been passed to date and the savings provisions keep Law
No 20/2000 in force until those laws are passed.
Law 20/2000 applies to non-profit making organizations is any grouping having legal
entity, governed by civil law, constituted by physical or by moral entities which aim at
social works and which decide to put in common, and in a permanent way, their
knowledge or their activity for a goal other than making profit. Every association of
persons applying for legal entity as a non-profit making organization must beforehand
present its aims and plan of action to the district at the place it intends to base and
operate, in order for it, to get the provisional agreement of the district. This plan of
action is required to –
show the means held by members or advocated by the organization in meeting
its aims; and
attach a nominal list of all members of the grouping with each one’s signature.
The decision of the district is to be made and notified within a three months' period
from application.
Rwanda Civil Society Mapping – Final Report
7
The decision to register a non-profit making organization is in fact the decision to grant
legal entity status to the association by the Minister holding the portfolio of justice.
That ministerial decision is to be made within 6 months from the deposit of the
application with the Minister. The statutes of the non-profit making organization are
required to include the following –
the organisation name;
the headquarters and complete address;
the objective(s) for which the organization was formed;
the area(s) of activity;
the assets;
the assets’ disposal provisions in case of dissolution;
the rules to be followed in modifying the statutes;
the procedure to convene a General Assembly; and
modalities to gain or to lose membership.
An organization recognized as a legal entity is required to be administered by one or
several legal representatives chosen from among the duly registered members by the
latter's majority and the legal representatives are to be approved by the Minister
having Justice in his portfolio and published in the Official Gazette of the Republic of
Rwanda. Every other application posterior to the organization's constitution seeking
the approval of a legal representative or a substitute is required to be signed by the
majority of all the duly registered members sitting in its General Assembly.
All associations must publish in the Official Gazette of the Republic of Rwanda the
following:
the association’s statutes and any modification;
the act approving the legal representatives and/or substitute legal
representatives, starting their names, forenames, professions, home or
residence (address);
the resolutions by the majority of the General Assembly and court
decisions relating to the organization dissolution, conditions of
Rwanda Civil Society Mapping – Final Report
8
liquidation and appointment of liquidators together with their names,
home or residence addresses.
Every non-profit making organization registered outside of Rwanda and wishing to
undertake activities within Rwandan is required to be authorized before undertaking
any activities. The application must include –
the nature of anticipated activities;
the implementation schedule and its various stages of planning;
the targeted population and the area where activities will take place;
detailed cost estimates with data;
means available - material, human and financial;
means expected and their origin;
results anticipated at end of activity; and
contemplated successors for the launched activities or the executed
works at the association's winding up.
To be attached to this application are a copy of the association's authenticated
statutes, every document stating its agreement and eventually, all information relating
to its geographical establishment throughout the world. The granting of the authority
is subject to –
adequacy between planned activities and the means availed or
expected;
the benefit of the activities' impact on the population,; and
the commitment to achieve the proposed objectives.
Monitoring and evaluation of all non-profit making organization shall be carried out by
the relevant district and the district may at any time ask any CSO to give it all data and
documents concerning its activities. A CSO is bound to satisfy such a request within
one month.
Foreign registered CSOs are to be registered with the Ministry having the Local
Administration in its portfolio upon presentation of the acquired working permit.
Rwanda Civil Society Mapping – Final Report
9
Every CSO working in Rwanda shall submit, latest on April 30 of each year, a detailed
report of its achievements and its balance-sheet and financial situation for the ended
exercise. The annual report is required to indicate the achieved activities in the plan
submitted at the authorization request or for the provisional agreement to exercise
those activities on the Rwandan territory. Copies of the reports are required to be
submitted to the relevant districts and the Ministers having local government, justice,
international cooperation and foreign affairs within in their portfolios
Districts are required by 31 May to forward to the Ministers having in their portfolios
the non-profit organization's fields of activity concerned, a brief report on these
associations' performance, their property and their accounts within the exercise
concerned. Every Minister having in portfolio the activities of one or several non-profit
making organizations, shall send to the Cabinet latest on June 30 of each year, a
concise report on the achievements and the situation of these associations.
These laws are substantially under review and additional laws have been drafted and
passed through various stages of legislative approval in order to implement the new
organic law.
1.6 Registration of CSOs in Rwanda – The Practice
The practice of CSO registration in Rwanda varies completely from the legal
framework. Rwandan CSOs are required to register annually with the Ministry of Local
Government (MINALOC) and foreign CSOs are required to register with the Director-
General of Immigration.
Inspection of the registration records of CSOs at MINALOC demonstrated as follows –
Districts have no role in respect of CSO registration;
Few, if any, CSOs provide details as to activities, budgets, staffing, sources of
funding or staffing;
Registration details are not shared with districts within which the CSOs are to
be registered;
Rwanda Civil Society Mapping – Final Report
10
Monitoring of CSOs is not carried out by MINALOC;
The legal processes of appointing legal representatives is not carried out;
No reports are provided by districts to the relevant line ministries in respect of
the activities of CSOs in their districts;
Recording of registration details was inconsistent and not easily acceptable.
Inspection of the records at the Director General of Immigrations Office demonstrated
a more standardised recording process, but otherwise was not dissimilar to the
circumstances observed at MINALOC.
At a district level, the experience in respect of CSO legal compliance is varied. In no
district was there observable evidence of application to the districts for relevant
permission to operate. There was no evidence in any district of monitoring and
evaluation by the district of the activities of CSOs operating within their district. Some
districts had extensive records of basic details of CSOs operating in their districts, while
other districts held no records. Districts did not report to line ministries in respect of
CSO activities within their districts.
It is clear that the purpose of the Organic Law for CSO registration and regulation is a
solid concept, but the subsidiary laws have not been passed an, as far as can be
determined, have not been drafted or further contemplated.
1.7 Registration and Regulation of CSOs – the Way Forward
The Government of Rwanda has a fundamental interest in the registration and
regulation of CSOs operating in Rwanda. This interest has a variety of aspects,
including security and economic planning. To be effective, registration and regulation
of CSOs must be centralised, encompassing, transparent and allow for efficient
monitoring and evaluation.
In terms of ministerial mandates, MINALOC is clearly the ministry which has the
mandate in respect of CSO activities because these activities are carried out at a
district level. This mandate must be tempered by the interests of relevant line
Rwanda Civil Society Mapping – Final Report
11
ministries in respect of CSO sectoral activities. However, the Ministry of Finance and
Economic Planning (MINECOFIN) has a major interest in the fiscal impacts of CSO
sectoral investments.
Monitoring and evaluation of CSO activities is a difficult matter as there are so many
activities undertaken. For there to be effective M&E of these activities requires that a
solid and substantial data base exists of annual CSO activities. M&E also takes several
forms – the physical and the financial. The physical M&E is a matter for the relevant
line ministries in close engagement with MINALOC. The financial is a matter for both
the line ministries and MINECOFIN. The line ministry financial interest is in respect of
ensuring value for money is attained from CSO activities. The MINECOFIN interest is
that in terms of planning and budgeting, it is essential that MINECOFIN has verifiable
data in respect of all CSO activities.
There does exist a very cost-effective method of ensuring that these interests are all
met. MINECOFIN operates a Development Assistance Database (DAD) which is meant
to record all non-government development assistance. It is a very straight forward
matter for the registration details of all CSOs in Rwanda to be registered by the CSOs
themselves directly into the DAD. It would be a requirement of having entered all of
the required details into the DAD for MINALOC to issue a registration certification. As
the DAD is open to any user to inspect, it becomes a transparent and method of
ensuring CSO registrations are handled in a comprehensive manner. Registration of a
CSO would therefore depend on the CSOs themselves providing all required
information, with no further input requirements by the government.
The benefits of this approach are that it requires no new systems to be introduced and
it satisfies the information needs of both central and local governments. It is already
necessary to draft and pass the necessary laws to implement the organic CSO law and
this is a matter of priority for the Government of Rwanda which can be attended to
promptly to ensure that registration processes are all-encompassing and provide the
details required in a fashion that will allow for substantive M&E to be undertaken.
Rwanda Civil Society Mapping – Final Report
12
This will require an immediate reconsideration of the laws currently being moved
through the approval system so as to be able to incorporate these reforms.
2.0 OBJECTIVES AND TASKS
2.1 Objectives of the CSO Mapping Study
The overall objectives of the Civil Society Mapping Study are to contribute to -
h. Increased understanding of the impacts of the civil society activities in Rwanda
through aggregating the CSOs activities;
i. Harmonized distribution of activities by the CSOs and coordinated activities and
programmes through mapping out the activities sector by sector;
j. Informed future planning processes of the CSOs and required funding through
assessing the gaps currently exist;
k. Informing better the Government and RCSP planning process by quantifying the
CSO contribution in the national estimates;
l. Quantify the CSO contribution in the national estimates;
m. Use the information generated from the study to form the basis of the lobby
and advocacy; and
n. To assess where CSOs have a comparative advantage so that in its
complementary role with the government, the latter comes in where there is a
gap to fill. This complementary role will enhance specialization in different
sectors by different stakeholders.
2.2 Expected Results & Actual Results
The expected results were –
Mapping activities of the CSOs in all the districts of Rwanda, detailing out the
domain of intervention and come up with the pattern of their distribution;
Gather flow of CSO funding information for both LNGOs and INGSOs
(disbursement information) and activities from relevant Government and
district entities (i.e. MINALOC, Directorate General of Immigration and
Emigration) and from CSO organizations;
Assess activities and source of their funding;
Meet members of the civil society district by district to discuss their programs,
Rwanda Civil Society Mapping – Final Report
13
funding opportunities available, challenges, best practices and way forward;
Document results and impacts of CSO activities;
Work out details of the employment statistics within individual organizations
constituting the Civil Society;
Gather qualitative information on the activities of organizations working in
governance, advocacy and human rights; and
Help organize and moderate a user workshop to present and discuss the draft
report at a national workshop of members and stakeholders and to validate the
draft report.
Not all of these expected results could be achieved, especially in terms of impacts of
CSO activities and employment statistics. There were many reasons for this occurring.
Firstly the data held by many of the CSOs is partial and non-descriptive. Many CSOs do
not have activity plans; those that have activity plans often do not necessarily budget
all activities separately; CSOs generally do not have baseline surveys or impact surveys
that allow for impact determination. Not all CSOs operate in such a fashion, but it is a
more usual that not scenario. Secondly, CSOs do not plan and implement activities
sectorally, in that most CSOs undertake activities that have cross-sectoral impacts. For
instance, a CSO may work with deprived children by paying school fees, undertaking
education activities in respect of health and rights issues and by engaging in promoting
sports. Such an approach crosses many sectors and the definition of what sector they
are engaged in and what is the expected impact are often not described.
Secondly, CSOs operate on differing financial years – some use a calendar year; others
the government of Rwanda financial year and others the financial year of their donor
funding source. It becomes very difficult to assess impacts within comparable periods.
Thirdly, for CSOs with multiple major donors, records are often kept in differing
fashions according to funding requirements. Many donors mandate the use of their
own planning, budgeting and reporting systems. This is both a major burden on CSOs
and also makes comparison and data collection very difficult.
Rwanda Civil Society Mapping – Final Report
14
2.3 Additional aspects
From the point of view of the stakeholders, there has not been sufficient level of
dialogue between the CSOs in Rwanda and key stakeholders including the government
itself. There is also a general feeling that there is a gap created by lack of sufficient
information about the activities of the CSOs in Rwanda and their contribution to the
national development agenda laid out the EDPRS and the Vision 2020. This should not
be the case as the CSO are perceived as a key pillar to deliver national goals and
development.
CSOs are a key channel for development aid. Therefore the concern is that aid
effectiveness in respect of CSO activities and its contribution to the development
agenda is not documented. This mapping exercise responds to these concerns and –
informs the level of understanding for the CSOs to better engage the
government in the development arena;
measures the CSOs activities/contributions by documenting CSO actions; and
informs the level of understanding of the CSOs’ sectoral economic contribution.
3.0 APPROACH
The CSO mapping was undertaken under the direct supervision of the RSCP and in
close collaboration with the Aid Coordination Unit (ACU) of the United Nations in
Rwanda to -
a. Map out activities of CSOs in all the districts of Rwanda and their
interventions and come up with the pattern of their distribution;
b. Establish accurate CSO funding information and activities from relevant
Government and district entities and CSOs;
c. Assess activities and sources of their funding;
d. Meet members of CSOs district by district to discuss their programs,
funding opportunities available, challenges, best practices and way forward;
e. Document results and impacts of CSO activities;
f. Determine employment statistics within individual CSOs;
g. Gather qualitative information on the activities of CSOs working in
Rwanda Civil Society Mapping – Final Report
15
governance, advocacy and human rights; and
h. Assist to organize and moderate a national workshop to present and discuss
and validate the draft report.
The data was collected from the Ministry of Local Government (MINALOC) by
attending at the Ministry and receiving their electronic data records. These were then
checked by the physical examination of every registration received and recorded by
MINALOC for the relevant period. The data that was available from the registration
documents was generally not compliant with the existing legal framework in respect of
the information that was required to be provided, in particular in respect of salaries
paid, assets owned and donor/funding sources.
The data that collected from the Department of Immigration was the electronic record
of the registrations held by the department and then a physical examination of every
record held by the department to verify the electronic record. This data was then cross
checked at a later time by the annual reports that were filed with the department
3.1 – Key Benchmarks
Key benchmarks Date
Contract signing 23/12/2010
Present Inception Report 08/01/ 2011
Complete field work 30/03/2011
Draft report submitted 18/04/2011
Stakeholder Workshop TBD
Final report submitted TBD
The draft report was submitted after the date detailed above due to delays in accessing data responses from stakeholders.
4.0 METHODOLOGY
A participatory methodology was used involving different stake holders. This mapping
exercise was a particularly challenging task because it required the consultants to not
only establish the activities and funding of the various CSOs (national and
Rwanda Civil Society Mapping – Final Report
16
international) within Rwanda but also to establish the relevance and value for money
of the activities undertaken and the funds expended. The consultants obtained obtain
this buy-in from the CSOs by obtaining from the appropriate Government of Rwanda
agency the appropriate sanction and adoption of this mapping exercise as a matter of
government policy. This support went a long way to overcoming the potential
reluctance of CSOs to divulge the required information
4.1 Methodological Approach Employed
In accordance to the above objectives, the bottom line objective of the mapping
exercise was to measure the contribution of the CSOs to Rwanda’s development
agenda. In order to be as comprehensive as possible, the mapping exercise study was
taken in three stages. The first stage involved visiting the umbrella or platform
organizations involved with CSOs, local and international, with the aim of
understanding the nature and structure of Rwanda’s CSOs from the platform point of
view.
The second stage was to visit the Ministry of Local Government and Social affairs
(MINALOC) and the Immigration Directorate were local CSOs and international CSOs
are, respectively, registered. This was a necessary step because all the locally
registered CSOs and the international CSOs are required to obtain an authorisation
certificate from MINALOC and Immigration, respectively, before they are operational
in Rwanda. To obtain registration and therefore obtain a practicing certificate, the
CSOs are required to provide specific information about the contact address and
location operation, the amount of money (yearly budgets) involved, the sector or the
intended activities and prospective donors. This stage also involved contacting the
development partners or donor community that are directly involved in supporting the
CSO or CSOs in Rwanda in order to validate the information obtained. This involved
two ways that were effective; one was to obtain the data from the DAD data base and
the other was to approach the major donor communities directly, such as the UNDP,
USAID, DFID, GTZ, EU and the bilateral donor community. The later proved to be more
effective because not all the donors update their contributions via the DAD database
website but also allowed contacting the headquarters themselves directly.
Rwanda Civil Society Mapping – Final Report
17
The third stage involved physical visits to the districts where the CSO are on the
ground and operational. This meant visiting district by district to take stock of the
CSO’s operations in the districts including the district JADFs in person in order to
obtain all the details of the CSOs operating in their respective districts.
4.2 Approach to Data Collection
Using the approach narrated above, data was gathered from Immigration Department
(for international CSOs) and MINALOC (for local CSOs) using a stock-taking approach of
noting the address, district of operation, the yearly budget, sector and activities and
the prospective donor(s).
For the international CSOs, the information was better organized than the local CSOs.
The material filed by the international CSOs was generally more complete and
responsive to the requirements for information provision that the local CSOs. The local
CSO data at MINALOC was difficult to obtain because the information filed by local
CSOs was generally not responsive to a common format not had the data been
electronically entered in a consistent and common format. The team at MINALOC in
charge of organizing the data was still compiling the data for the relevant period and
the electronic form of the data, on examination, was not complete or consistent with
the data from the hard copies that had been filed by the local CSOs.
Therefore, the data collection team was faced with large volumes of fragmented and
unorganised hard copies of the material filed by local CSOs. The team therefore had a
burden of reorganizing all of the data for analysis and this meant fresh stocktaking of
all the local CSOs registered at MINALOC and extracting specific information such as
addresses, districts where they operate, the activities, sector of intervention, the
budget involved and the supporting donors from each one of the hard copies that had
been filed. It was a very cumbersome and tedious exercise to go through all the
registered CSOs and extract the kind of information relevant to the exercise. This was
made more difficult because the data had not been provided by the local CSOs in a
common format and this required almost all of the hard copies of the documents filed
Rwanda Civil Society Mapping – Final Report
18
to be read in full. Additionally, material within individual submissions was also not
internally consistent and required reconciliation which slowed the process of data
collection.
4.3 Organisation of Data
A stock taking format was used that is easy to understand and comprehensive enough
to capture all the details necessary for the execution of this assignment. It is worth
noting that the core objective of the CSOs mapping exercise was to measure the
contribution of the local and international CSOs to Rwanda’s development agenda and
more specifically their contribution to the EDPRS implementation, thus the
information/data collected were posted to the respective 14 EDPRS sectors. The table
designed looks as follows and is the form that is used in the various annexes.
CSO Name Local or
Internation
al
Registered
(Yes/No)
Activities Districts of
Operation
Budget as
reported
Budget
in FRW
The table captures the name of the CSO, its status in terms of being local or
international, registration status, the core activities that particular CSO is engaged in.
These activities are what worked as guideline to establish the sector of intervention or
EDPRS sector a particular CSO was involved in. The table also captures the district of
operation, and the budgetary allocations associated with each CSO.
Data entry using this format required some assumptions and interpretations to be
made which had an impact on the allocation of the CSO activities within the EDPRS
framework.
Most all CSOs described their activities with precision and it was often unclear
as to which category the activities should be place. For instance, a CSO
undertaking education in respect of an agriculture related matter could be
placed within agriculture or education. In these cases the activity was entered
under the prime apparent area of operation from the material filed by the CSO.
This will inevitably lead to errors in classification from the perception of an
individual CSO, but given the poor CSO response rate to the request for
Rwanda Civil Society Mapping – Final Report
19
comments on the draft study report, it must be assumed that the CSOs have no
objection to the classifications generally.
In respect of districts of operation, many of the filings were not precise as to
the districts. In the analysis of the results, it will be seen that there was a
preponderance of activities focused on the Kigali districts. It has been
commented that this reflects an error in data collection as this preponderance
is caused by the place of the office of the CSO and not the district of operation.
This is not the case as the error, if any, lies in the CSOs who completed the
registration forms. The forms are quite clear as to what is required and if a CSO
gave its district of operation as one of the Kigali Districts and the material in the
registration forms did not evidence operations in any other district, then the
entry of a CSO as operating within the Kigali districts is a valid entry. This is
what was done in respect of the data entry.
Many CSOs operate in multiple districts, but their budgets do not disaggregate
activities and expenses between districts. Experience has shown that most
CSOs could not disaggregate district activity costs with precision as it would
require proportionate allocation of assets and main administration costs to be
able to do so. Therefore, for the purpose of analysis, where a CSO stated that it
operated in multiple districts, the budget for that CSO was split between all of
the districts on a pro rata basis.
Some CSOs stated that they engaged in multi-sectoral activities without
disaggregating the activities in terms of budget. Most of these CSOs (although
not all) engaged in multi-sectoral activities as a consequence of supporting the
prime activity. For instance, a CSO concerned with youth issues or social
protection, may engage in agriculture, education and other training activities.
In these cases the CSO was ranked under agriculture as the prime area of focus.
Data was manually entered into different EDPRS Sectors basing on the activity that is
carried out by a particular CSO. Take the example of the health sector, all CSOs active
in health interventions were captured under EDPRS 12. By doing this, all international
and local CSOs intervening in the same EDPRS Sector were captured with all the
information pertaining them including their budgetary figures for all the 14 EDPRS
Rwanda Civil Society Mapping – Final Report
20
Sectors. This allowed the generation of the contribution of each CSO in each EDPRS
Sector and the total contribution of each CSO per EDPRS Sector. Data was captured
using the above tool for all local CSOs per sector then after the international CSOs
followed.
By using this approach, it became possible to determine sectoral expenditure per
district. This was not a straight forward calculation as the data entry format had
clustered the districts and the data lines then had to be disaggregated for each CSO
and by every district so that it was possible to sum the sector expenditures on a district
basis. As is noted above, this required assumptions to be made in respect of data
entry.
4.4 District Visits
The most involving work was the physical visits to all of the districts. The purpose of
the visits was to verify the data gathered in respect of the CSOs from MINALOC and the
Directorate of Immigration. The visits were very useful and more CSOS that had not
been provided by MINALOC and Immigration were identified and the details recorded.
MINALOC and District JADFs were quite vocal in respect of the constraints faced by
them in the supervision of CSOs and these can be generalized as follows;
It is believed by MINALOC that most CSOs are hesitant to reveal their entire
information especially the budget breakdown required at the time of
registration. This results in either the understatement of the budgets or the
lack of budget breakdown. While the issue of budget understatement is not
capable of verification, the failure to breakdown the details of the budgets as
required was quite marked and noticeable when the data was being collected.
It was the usual case that local CSOs did not disaggregate wages or related
costs and expenditures. It should be noted that while the disaggregation was
not provided, the matter was also not followed up by MINALOC.
At the district level, the availability of information to the District JADFs in
respect to CSO is a major issue as most District JADFs have a complete absence
of detailed data and information on the CSOs, especially regarding the budgets
and donors involved.
Rwanda Civil Society Mapping – Final Report
21
Some of the CSOs do not respect the law when it comes to compulsory
registration. A case in point is the practice of some local CSOs which resurface
just for the sake of targeting available donor money. For example, one local
CSO in Bugesera was witnessed by the data collection team turning up to
register because it came to be aware that the Global Fund was sponsoring the
local CSOs to run some projects. The District JADFs state that such CSOs
disappear on receiving the donor money and never report back with progress
reports on activities.
CSOs that are donor funded are obliged to regularly report to the Donors and
not the JADFs. The JADFs miss out on the vital information regarding the CSOs
activities at the district level. The officials at MINALOC and Immigration face
the same problem with respect to insufficient availability of reports in respect
of CSO activities.
At the district level, some of the Districts do not yet have JADFs whilst in some
others the JADFs are typically new to the extent that they have not managed to
capture systematic CSOs data.
At the district level, most JADFs encounter a refusal of CSOs to release
employment data. This is not to be unexpected because even on registration,
most CSOs do not release the data required in respect of employment.
4.5 Data verification from donors
In order to cross-check the relevant data, the team contacted all known donors by
email, with follow-up communications, in order to check the CSOs that were funded by
the donors on Rwanda. Very few donors responded at all, but of the few that did,
useful information was gained. In one case, the team was requested to visit the offices
of a donor where these matters were discussed and despite that meeting, the
information was still not provided. There were notable exceptions to this in that some
donors did provide substantive and useful information, but the result was generally
poor. It is regrettable that the donors were not more communicative over these
matters as it would have provided a useful additional check on the data quality.
Rwanda Civil Society Mapping – Final Report
22
4.6 Data Verification
In order to verify the data in the draft study report, the various platforms circulated a
copy of the draft report among members for comment. The response rate was very
low. Some international CSOs identified concerns with data and these were corrected,
but there was a limited response from local CSOs. As a consequence, the team was
directed to visit the major local CSOs and verify the data for them. In conjunction with
the RCSP, contact was made with the various CSOs and the results were less than
fruitful and the information was not generally provided for cross checking. The team
also visited the Directorate of Immigration and they checked the available data against
their data base and have verified the data.
The consequence is that the data contained in this report is the best available data and
has been cross-checked as far as it is possible to do so within the limits of co-operation
given. There will be errors in the data, as such matters are unavoidable despite all best
efforts, but the data does represent an overall accurate picture of the current situation
in Rwanda.
4.7 National Level
National level officials from the Ministry of Local Government (MINALOC) and the
Department for Immigration, donors and national CSO peak organisations were
interviewed to initially identify the potential lists of all CSOs operating in Rwanda and
their areas of sectoral operations. From the Government of Rwanda, details of all
registered CSOs were obtained and to this was added the unregistered CSOs that were
discovered through field work. Donors were asked to confirm details of all CSOs
funded by them as a cross-check of CSOs, but in general, the donor response to
information requests was poor, despite numerous requests. Notable exceptions were
USAID, DFID, all UN agencies and the Royal Netherlands Embassy which all provided
detailed and useful information.
The registration information of CSOs available for within the Government of Rwanda
was not completely entered electronically and all of the registration information had
to be re-entered as part of this mapping exercise to be able to access the data. In the
Rwanda Civil Society Mapping – Final Report
23
section above on CSO registration processes, these issues are dealt with at length.
4.8 Structured Interview Tool
RC created a structured interview tool to enable a harmonised interview process. This
tool covered legal and institutional framework, sectoral activities, budgets, annual
activities and reports (including evaluation reports) & employment structure and
history. The first draft of this tool is annexed to this Inception Report. The consultants
visited every district and carried out the survey and mapping of all of the CSOs in each
district.
4.9 Analysis
In order to be useful as a report, the data was ordered and analysed to examine the
various CSO contributions to economic development and poverty reduction by
reference to the goals, strategies and indicators of Vision 2020 and the Economic
Development and Poverty Reduction Strategy (EDPRS). This places the various
contributions within a common structured framework that can be understood by all
stakeholders.
Some stakeholders believe that the EDPRS is not the best framework to assess all
activities performed by civil society. The EDPRS provides, on this view, an excellent
framework to assess service delivery provided by CSOs, however, some CSOs carry out
other activities such as advocacy, peacebuilding, dialogue and reconciliation, human
rights, media etc. These types of activities do not fit in any of the EDPRS areas and
therefore the use of a broader framework such as Vision 2020 (which includes
governance) or MDGs to complement the EDPRS sectors is more appropriate. This
view has merit but any mapping needs a base reference point that allows for efficient
anf effective comparison. The only current comparison that is possible is the EDPRS as
that is the mechanism through which the Vision 2020 is implemented and also is the
framework for the national budget that allows for comparison of expenditures.
This framework was also considered inappropriate by some stakeholders in reference
to some CSO activities that can require a relatively small budget and still have a big
Rwanda Civil Society Mapping – Final Report
24
impact (e.g. advocacy activities to improve a law or awareness raising activities cost
much less than building and running a health centre). On this view, the current
framework of analysis assumes that a bigger expenditure means a higher level of
activities which is misleading. The point that must be understood is that almost
without exception, CSOs in Rwanda lack any baselines that were taken prior to the
commencement of activities against which impact can be assessed. Further, most CSOs
also do not undertake post activity completion monitoring and evaluation to
determine levels of impact. This is to be understood in the context of the costs of such
evaluations, but without these essential baselines, allegations of CSO activity impact
are merely anectdotal and the only baseline for comparision that is available today is
financial. Greater expenditure does not, of course, assume greater impact. One of the
major drawbacks in respect of this survey was, in view of the complete absence of
baseline data, the inabity to conduct a value for money survey in respect of CSO
activities, particularly when compared to those activities that are also undertaken by
government..
The analysis, against each strategy and indicator of VISION 2020 and the EDPRS,
compares each CSOs contribution to the attainment of those goals and the value for
money in attaining those goals. As most CSOs do not have baseline data against which
to measure contribution and that data, if available, is often not disaggregated
sufficiently to allow for comparisons.
The analysis identifies -
a. the available funding on a sectoral basis for all of the activities undertaken so
that overall fiscal investments can be determined against outcomes, and
b. any overlaps or inconsistencies in the totality of CSO activities.
The only available and relatively complete date was in respect of FY 2009-2010. This
was because some CSOs ran FYs as calendar years and other adopted donor FYs and
this required aggregation of data to link the data back to a completed FY of the
Government of Rwanda. As the FY overlaps were so substantial, the reference year of
FY 2009-2010 was used as the only common year for which data was available or could
be referenced back to from all FYs. This is better understood when the FYs are
Rwanda Civil Society Mapping – Final Report
25
considered – the Government of Rwanda use July-June; the calendar year runs
January-December; some donor FYs are October-September and others use April-
March. This means that data had to be disaggregated into a standard year and using
the Government of Rwanda FY meant that the consultants had to extract data covering
three FYs (in whole or part).
4.10. Draft Report & Validation
The draft study report was circulated amongst all stakeholders by the platforms in
order to gain inputs. There were few responses from local CSOs raising concerns or
issues, but in order to ensure data validity, the largest of the local CSOs were
approached again to confirm the validity of the data.
In respect of the international CSOs, concerns were expressed as to the validity of the
data. The Department of Immigration was again approached after the initial data was
collected and every filing by all international CSOs for the registrations commencing
February 2011 that contain the annual reports for 2010 were again checked for data
accuracy with officials of the Department of Immigration. Amendments were made as
necessary.
A consultative workshop was held on 26 July 2011 and all stakeholders were given
until 9 August to make any written comments in respect of the validity of the data.
Some coments were received and all comments were incorporated. The report was
delayed by a few days because notwithstanding the cut-off date, major comments
were received from stakeholders very late and these were nevertheless incorporated.
5.0 ANALYSIS OF RESULTS - OVERVIEW
The EDPRS consists of 14 Sectors – as are listed in the Table1 below.
Table 1 – EDPRS sectors
EDPRS SECTORS
01 GENERAL PUBLIC SERVICE
02 DEFENSE
03 PUBLIC ORDER AND SAFETY
04 ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
Rwanda Civil Society Mapping – Final Report
26
EDPRS SECTORS
05 AGRICULTURE
06 INDUSTRY AND COMMERCE
07 FUEL AND ENERGY
08 TRANSPORT AND COMMUNICATION
09 LAND HOUSING & COMMUNITY AMENITIES
10 WATER AND SANITATION
11 YOUTH CULTURE AND SPORTS
12 HEALTH
13 EDUCATION
14 SOCIAL PROTECTION
The EDPRS sectors above do not exactly tally with those used by CSOs, but these are
the published EDPRS sectors on the MINECOFIN website and unless officially chaged,
these are the sectors that the report will use. To change the secotral calculations is a
stricht forward matter, as and when they are changed officially.
It was against this framework that all CSO activities were analysed to determine which
sector the CSO activities fell within. The analysis of all of the CSO expenditure by
sectors is listed in Table 2 below.
Table 2 – Analysis of CSO Expenditure by EDPRS Sector EDPRS SECTORS International RWF Local RWF Total RWF Total US$ % Total
Investment
01 GENERAL PUBLIC SERVICE
9,292,808,094 2,506,529,693 11,799,337,787 19,830,820 4.63%
02 DEFENSE 0 0 0 0 0.00%
03 PUBLIC ORDER AND SAFETY
2,387,107,049 1,066,914,045 3,454,021,094 5,805,077 1.36%
04 ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
1,869,591,835 1,801,940,343 3,671,532,178 6,170,642 1.44%
05 AGRICULTURE 33,052,121,103 6,045,169,657 39,097,290,760 65,709,732 15.34%
06 INDUSTRY AND COMMERCE
1,652,003,110 93,723,044 1,745,726,154 2,933,994 0.69%
07 FUEL AND ENERGY
31,931,270 84,826,432 116,757,702 196,231 0.05%
08 TRANSPORT AND COMMUNICATION
0 0 0 0.00%
09 LAND HOUSING & COMMUNITY AMENITIES
75,137,195 1,331,813,422 1,406,950,617 2,364,623 0.55%
10 WATER AND SANITATION
2,381,609,498 197,712,631 2,579,322,129 4,334,995 1.01%
Rwanda Civil Society Mapping – Final Report
27
EDPRS SECTORS International RWF Local RWF Total RWF Total US$ % Total Investment
11 YOUTH CULTURE AND SPORTS
2,363,715,894 918,931,780 3,282,647,674 5,517,055 1.29%
12 HEALTH 70,439,647,863 5,338,665,215 75,778,313,078 127,358,509 29.74%
13 EDUCATION 23,298,020,504 30,431,604,118 53,729,624,622 90,301,890 21.08%
14 SOCIAL PROTECTION
40,418,860,424 17,753,212,976 58,172,073,400 97,768,191 22.83%
175,957,560,999 55,971,940,142 254,833,597,195 428,291,760 100%
Graph 1 - % of Total CSO investments by EDPRS Sector
As can be seen, the majority of the funds expended by CSOs in Rwanda are
overwhelmingly concentrated (88.99%) in the four sectors of health (29.74%%),
education (21.08%), social protection (22.83%) and agriculture (15.34%). While there
are definitional issues in respect of the allocation of activity expenditure to sectors, the
majority of those allocation issues related to multi-purpose expenditures (e.g.
education expenditure on health related matters) within these four sectors and
misallocation of expenditure is not a substantive issue. Table 3 below identifies the
relative expenditure of CSO funds through international and local NGOs.
Rwanda Civil Society Mapping – Final Report
28
Table 3 – Analysis of CSO Relative Expenditure by EDPRS Sector by International and Local CSOs
EDPRS SECTORS
International CSO % of Sectoral Expenditure
Local CSO % of Sectoral Expenditure
DEFENSE 0.00% 0.00% PUBLIC ORDER AND SAFETY 69.11% 30.89% ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION 50.92% 49.08% AGRICULTURE 84.54% 15.46% INDUSTRY AND COMMERCE 94.63% 5.37% FUEL AND ENERGY 27.35% 72.65% TRANSPORT AND COMMUNICATION 0.00% 0.00% LAND HOUSING & COMMUNITY AMENITIES 5.34% 94.66% WATER AND SANITATION 92.33% 7.67% YOUTH CULTURE AND SPORTS 72.01% 27.99% HEALTH 92.95% 7.05% EDUCATION 43.36% 56.64% SOCIAL PROTECTION 69.48% 30.52%
Graph 2 - CSO Relative Expenditure by EDPRS Sector by International and Local CSOs
In EDPRS sectors 1, 2, 5, 6, 10, 11, 12 and 14, international CSOs expended the most
substantial portion of the funds expended in any sector, and overall, expended 75.9%
Rwanda Civil Society Mapping – Final Report
29
of all CSO expenditure in Rwanda. However, the figure of interest is the expenditure in
EDPRS Sector 13 – Education where local CSOs expended 56.64% of all of the funds
expended by CSOs in the education sector. There are other sectors where local CSOs
exceeded international CSO expenditure, but the importance of the figures for the
education sector lie in the volume of funds expended by that sector.
Most of the funds expended by CSOs (international and local) come from outside of
Rwanda and the education sector spends 21.44% of the total of all CSO expenditure in
Rwanda and the international funding sources for the education sector overwhelming
support local CSO expenditure of the majority of funds in that sector. The question
that naturally follows is why is this so in the education sector and not in the other
three large spending EDPRS sectors?
The benefit of the CSOs operating in the education sector in spending the majority of
the funds in that sector is clear –
Such an approach is very cost effective as the overhead costs of local CSOs are
lower than those on international CSOs (although this figure cannot be
quantified with exactitude without lengthy case studies);
The impact of capacity building of CSOs in the education sector is substantial;
It is reflective of a substantial degree of trust in the capacity of local CSOs in the
education sector.
However, this is not to say that the relative expenditures in the other sectors are
reflective of distrust of local capacity in those sectors, rather it is better to express it
that the level of comfort required for international funding sources to allow for
majority local expenditure of CSO funds in the other sectors has not yet been reached.
It is also important to note that this CSO mapping exercise is not an exercise in
determining the relative efficiencies of international versus local CSO expenditure in a
sector, as each sector and each sector specific approach calls for varying capacities and
levels of expertise which will determine the most efficient and effective means of
expenditure, and hence attainment of sector goals. This is best understood by an
example: if international funding sources were supporting the health sector to acquire
Rwanda Civil Society Mapping – Final Report
30
from the international market specific drugs for distribution within the government
Rwanda health care system, it is understandable that the majority of the funding
would go to an international CSO that had specific capacity in respect of the sourcing
of health supplies. While there may be Rwandan CSOs with experience in health supply
procurement, it is understandable that the funding might in first instance be lodged
with an international CSO with a greater depth of experience.
The recommendation is that this is an area that requires further specific examination
to determine the reasons for the disparity in international versus local CSO
expenditure in the major spending sectors (other than education) and what are the
benefits to be obtained for Rwanda and the impediments to be overcome to promote
a greater proportion of expenditure in these sectors being channeled through
Rwandan CSOs or other processes.
6.1 Relative CSO vs. Government Expenditure
Table 4 below shows the relative CSO versus Government of Rwanda expenditure for
the same FY 2009/2010.
Table 4 – Comparison of CSO and Government of Rwanda Sectoral Expenditure – FY 2009/2010
EDPRS SECTORS
CSO Expenditure
Frw
GoR Expenditure
CSO and GoR Total
Expenditure
CSO Expenditure
% Total
GoR Expenditure
% Total
01 GENERAL PUBLIC SERVICE 11,799,337,787 234,316,719,873 246,116,057,660 5% 95%
02 DEFENSE 0 43,606,024,669 43,606,024,669 0% 100%
03 PUBLIC ORDER AND SAFETY 3,454,021,094 50,461,096,080 53,915,117,174 6% 94%
04 ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION 3,671,532,178 12,727,367,386 16,398,899,564 22% 78%
05 AGRICULTURE 39,097,290,760 56,352,700,444 95,449,991,204 41% 59%
06 INDUSTRY AND COMMERCE 1,745,726,154 21,086,726,474 22,832,452,628 8% 92%
07 FUEL AND ENERGY 116,757,702 64,807,185,147 64,923,942,849 0% 100%
08 TRANSPORT AND COMMUNICATION 0 105,107,821,377 105,107,821,377 0% 100%
Rwanda Civil Society Mapping – Final Report
31
EDPRS SECTORS
CSO Expenditure
Frw
GoR Expenditure
CSO and GoR Total
Expenditure
CSO Expenditure
% Total
GoR Expenditure
% Total
09 LAND HOUSING & COMMUNITY AMENITIES 1,406,950,617 4,954,883,991 6,361,834,608 22% 78%
10 WATER AND SANITATION 2,579,322,129 18,874,569,116 21,453,891,245 12% 88%
11 YOUTH CULTURE AND SPORTS 3,282,647,674 6,547,504,677 9,830,152,351 33% 67%
12 HEALTH 75,778,313,078 86,272,474,883 162,050,787,961 47% 53%
13 EDUCATION 53,729,624,622 154,645,591,784 208,375,216,406 26% 74%
14 SOCIAL PROTECTION 58,172,073,400 39,201,817,580 97,373,890,980 60% 40%
Graph 3 - CSO and Government of Rwanda Sectoral Expenditure – FY 2009/2010
This material displays that in 7 of the 14 EDPRS sectors that the proportion of CSO
expenditure as a percentage of total sectoral expenditure exceeds 20% and in two of
the sectors, CSO expenditure is close to or exceeds 50% of total sectoral expenditure.
The EDPRS sectors where that the proportion of CSO expenditure as a percentage of
total sectoral expenditure exceeds 20% are contained in Table 5 below.
Rwanda Civil Society Mapping – Final Report
32
Table 5 –Sectoral CSO Expenditure FY 2009/2010 Exceeds 20% Total National Expenditure
EDPRS Sector CSO Expenditure
% Total
04 ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION 22%
05 AGRICULTURE 41%
09 LAND HOUSING & COMMUNITY AMENITIES 22%
11 YOUTH CULTURE AND SPORTS 33%
12 HEALTH 46%
13 EDUCATION 24%
14 SOCIAL PROTECTION 60%
Table 5 clearly indicates the need for central government interaction with CSOs in
respect of the prioritization of sectoral expenditure within sectors as the level of CSO
expenditure in these sectors is a substantial proportion of the total sectoral
expenditure. This level of interaction is not evident today. Further, Table 5 also clearly
demonstrates the importance of CSOs in Rwanda in terms of overall service delivery
within the key EDPRS sectors. Given that CSOs in Rwanda have this level of
expenditure in terms of overall national expenditure in the key EDPRS sectoral areas, it
is recommended that the government give close and further consideration to the
formalization of interaction with CSOs on a continuing basis in order that key sectoral
investments are effectively addressed.
6.2 Relative CSO by District
As is seen in Table 6 Relative Total CSO Expenditure by District below, there is a great
disparity in overall CSO expenditure by district. Gasabo (11.56%), Bugesera (11.51%)
and Kayonza (10.18%) have attracted CSO expenditure across all sectors at rates that
exceed what could normally be expected and between the three districts account for
33.25% of all CSO expenditure across all districts.
A statistical average per district would normally have been expected to be of the order
of 3.33% per district of total expenditure, or 9.99% total for the three districts, but this
has been exceeded by over 300%. The impacts of this disparity are obvious, in that the
larger expenditure in these three districts is at the potential expense of other districts.
This is not to imply that these three districts received more funding than should have
Rwanda Civil Society Mapping – Final Report
33
been allocated on a needs basis or that funds were not well applied within those three
districts, because the authors are unaware of the details of all of the respective
sectoral strategies considered by all of the CSOs in making their allocations to differing
districts.
However, it does appear to be a statistical anomaly that that there is such a large
disparity for these districts. The recommendation for consideration is that on a
sectoral basis, when making district allocations for programmes, that CSOs be advised
to follow the relevant sector strategic plans which have identified relative district
needs. While this may even out funding approaches in the future, this is not certain as
it may well be that the combined effect of all of the sector strategic plans is to result in
heightened allocations to these three districts.
It is also important to note that the high expenditures in Kigali city could be as a result
of poor documentation where by some donors remit funds to the head office at
Gasabo in Kigali city where these NGOs are headquartered and yet these funds are
actually utilised in other districts where they are implementing projects. This may also
result into double counting.
Rwanda Civil Society Mapping – Final Report
34
Table 6 – Relative Total Sectoral CSO Expenditure FY 2009/2010 per District
01 GENERAL PUBLIC SERVICE
03 PUBLIC ORDER AND
SAFETY
04 ENVIRONMENT
AL PROTECTION 05 AGRICULTURE
06 INDUSTRY AND
COMMERCE
07 FUEL AND
ENERGY
09 LAND HOUSING &
COMMUNITY AMENITIES
10 WATER AND SANITATION
11 YOUTH CULTURE AND
SPORTS 12 HEALTH 13 EDUCATION 14 SOCIAL
PROTECTION TOTAL % 0f Total
Kicukiro 356,021,007 364,143,252 684,201,648 286,123,892 2,442,895 86,293,740 55,133,680 606,463,955 3,584,153,633 2,529,108,167 1,572,056,263 10,126,142,131 4.21%
Nyarugenge 313,622,659 346,657,032 114,627,048 145,956,023 2,442,895 140,293,740 9,515,625 608,113,205 5,652,002,699 725,825,982 1,542,366,909 9,601,423,815 4.00%
Gasabo 904,678,170 298,028,032 275,160,381 290,233,697 2,442,895 70,293,740 9,515,625 1,176,925,955 4,500,423,561 5,762,097,634 14,484,979,384 27,774,779,074 11.56%
Bugesera 374,808,429 77,539,344 27,251,500 3,321,943,135 2,442,895 10,833,333 142,514,046 139,515,625 41,028,767 5,330,039,030 12,713,076,649 5,478,258,952 27,659,251,705 11.51%
Rwamagana 329,701,896 93,209,915 13,451,500 1,207,880,670 2,442,895 13,996,597 19,655,767 2,117,993,297 454,143,492 1,515,639,180 5,768,115,208 2.40%
Kayonza 242,251,271 85,342,425 11,834,267 1,112,772,051 3,322,895 83,371,597 19,000,000 16,871,767 4,787,960,315 15,972,948,479 2,129,003,651 24,464,678,717 10.18%
Gatsibo 317,903,329 126,718,074 2,179,667 1,159,748,640 2,442,895 10,293,740 342,265,487 157,371,767 2,047,102,060 476,004,449 3,136,571,540 7,778,601,648 3.24%
Nyagatare 239,979,414 103,481,854 2,179,667 3,279,984,555 2,442,895 212,493,740 19,655,767 2,175,500,251 959,497,890 1,365,904,472 8,361,120,503 3.48%
Kirehe 327,150,375 69,671,854 9,468,417 1,333,833,253 5,702,261 10,293,740 17,371,767 3,363,312,195 308,803,805 852,819,371 6,298,427,038 2.62%
Ngoma 302,106,421 70,671,854 9,468,417 381,519,704 2,442,895 10,293,740 323,265,487 17,371,767 3,712,426,756 263,880,699 1,454,464,570 6,547,912,309 2.73%
Kamonyi 337,344,753 78,295,915 13,118,167 1,459,013,030 2,442,895 10,833,333 83,371,597 13,871,767 4,607,471,003 346,369,939 2,493,537,358 9,445,669,757 3.93%
Muhanga 325,546,187 101,644,125 2,179,667 362,556,057 2,442,895 52,326,432 76,841,903 146,497,806 163,819,303 1,529,812,350 487,459,860 2,066,810,396 5,317,936,978 2.21%
Ruhango 304,776,692 70,428,425 13,118,167 1,309,592,142 5,702,261 13,996,597 13,871,767 1,723,040,347 1,083,832,229 2,873,800,630 7,412,159,256 3.08%
Nyanza 324,279,375 69,671,854 2,179,667 1,304,857,258 2,442,895 10,293,740 13,871,767 1,659,895,678 327,716,305 1,217,435,446 4,932,643,985 2.05%
Huye 362,318,214 78,295,915 368,099,667 5,503,559,126 5,702,261 13,996,597 13,871,767 1,196,458,107 704,329,455 1,578,808,933 9,825,440,042 4.09%
Gisagara 302,606,421 77,539,344 2,179,667 1,176,709,705 2,442,895 10,293,740 13,871,767 1,144,879,836 257,506,205 1,544,037,334 4,532,066,913 1.89%
Nyamagabe 1,159,233,130 69,671,854 165,969,815 457,702,901 94,550,037 10,293,740 16,655,767 1,794,200,423 266,379,777 1,293,194,918 5,327,852,362 2.22%
Gakenke 304,776,692 77,539,344 2,179,667 1,108,463,906 2,442,895 10,293,740 19,496,767 1,881,034,381 319,861,720 738,899,474 4,464,988,583 1.86%
Rutsiro 346,148,454 69,671,854 17,317,668 344,274,080 134,602,895 10,293,740 13,871,767 1,545,677,279 280,767,882 528,155,788 3,290,781,405 1.37%
Nyamasheke 309,749,278 69,671,854 7,067,672 242,115,309 94,550,037 10,293,740 13,871,767 1,455,020,153 386,306,305 1,101,574,282 3,690,220,397 1.54%
Rubavu 336,232,166 69,671,854 53,617,668 350,504,358 2,442,895 10,293,740 96,097,579 1,821,483,746 366,335,757 890,690,022 3,997,369,783 1.66%
Nyabihu 304,776,692 70,428,425 222,334,667 1,363,179,571 126,232,028 76,841,903 16,655,767 1,507,817,055 1,568,860,955 718,340,495 5,975,467,557 2.49%
Ngororero 304,776,692 69,671,854 197,381,810 298,930,820 2,442,895 73,139,046 52,067,200 13,871,767 1,601,960,654 246,716,305 514,161,727 3,375,120,768 1.40%
Rusizi 332,379,499 69,671,854 7,067,672 1,350,510,307 97,809,403 10,293,740 13,871,767 1,331,259,462 598,937,366 1,230,890,730 5,042,691,799 2.10%
Burera 244,745,225 69,671,854 102,179,667 1,126,838,187 126,232,028 10,293,740 30,562,523 2,821,815,855 313,597,543 796,914,972 5,642,851,593 2.35%
Rwanda Civil Society Mapping – Final Report
35
01 GENERAL PUBLIC SERVICE
03 PUBLIC ORDER AND
SAFETY
04 ENVIRONMENT
AL PROTECTION 05 AGRICULTURE
06 INDUSTRY AND
COMMERCE
07 FUEL AND
ENERGY
09 LAND HOUSING &
COMMUNITY AMENITIES
10 WATER AND SANITATION
11 YOUTH CULTURE AND
SPORTS 12 HEALTH 13 EDUCATION 14 SOCIAL
PROTECTION TOTAL % 0f Total
Gicumbi 337,792,892 69,671,854 173,717,668 219,418,586 2,442,895 10,833,333 10,293,740 323,265,487 19,496,767 1,505,850,114 278,609,964 1,812,317,169 4,763,710,469 1.98%
Musanze 249,615,496 69,671,854 17,317,668 1,373,359,823 817,431,395 79,668,740 107,645,431 35,346,523 1,794,856,263 335,696,037 1,116,372,880 5,996,982,108 2.50%
Rulindo 316,051,692 70,046,854 291,229,900 338,915,669 2,442,895 10,293,740 45,618,055 19,496,767 1,500,320,644 306,714,132 939,330,473 3,840,460,821 1.60%
Nyaruguru 1,126,146,542 69,671,854 505,637,905 222,338,668 94,550,037 10,293,740 13,871,767 1,758,522,902 418,524,597 840,704,323 5,060,262,335 2.11%
Karongi 257,258,353 69,671,854 165,969,815 270,448,892 97,809,403 10,293,740 35,700,000 13,871,767 1,533,457,272 248,080,382 1,252,368,081 3,954,929,559 1.65%
Totals 11,594,777,415 3,095,744,224 3,479,686,773 32,703,284,014 1,745,726,154 84,826,432 1,331,813,422 1,609,005,509 3,251,047,674 72,985,747,318 49,307,989,962 59,080,409,722 240,270,058,619 100%
Graph 4 – Relative Sectoral Expenditure CSOs FY 2009/2010 per District
Rwanda Civil Society Mapping – Final Report
36
Also note that District expenditures were generated by dividing total expenditure by
the number of districts. This means expenditures per district were not available but
global expenditure comprising of districts where a portion of the funds was spent.
7.0 EDPRS 1 – GENERAL PUBLIC SERVICE
The data for EDPRS 1 is contained in Annex 3. Total expenditure in EDPRS 1 is 4.83% of
the total CSO annual expenditure and is one of the lesser relative areas of expenditure,
but is still substantial in overall terms at RWF 11.6 billion (US$19.5 million)
The majority of the activities are focused on good governance and the detail of the
activities and the budgets appear in Annex 3. In terms of overall district expenditure,
the mean expenditure would normally be expected at 3.33% per district, but as can be
seen from the below, the districts of Gasabo, Nyamagabe and Nyaruguru all have a
disproportionately level of expenditure compared to other districts. This will assume a
greater importance at a later time when the overall district analysis is considered.
Graph 5 – CSO Expenditure EDPRS 1 – General Public Service
8.0 EDPRS 2 – DEFENSE
No CSO expended funds in this sector.
Rwanda Civil Society Mapping – Final Report
37
9.0 EDPRS 3 – PUBLIC ORDER AND SAFETY
The activities and the budgets for EDPRS 3 are contained in Annex 4. This sector is
interesting because it represents only 1.29% of total CSO expenditure but is the sector
within which justice, law and order resides and it might have been thought appropriate
that CSOs would spend more on this sector given the history of genocide. The answer
appears to lay in the assumption that all matters related to the genocide are matters
to be solidly lead by government. In terms of overall district expenditure, the mean
expenditure would normally be expected at 3.33% per district, but as can be seen from
the below, the districts of Gasabo, Kicukiro and Nyarugenge all have a
disproportionately level of expenditure compared to other districts. This will assume a
greater importance at a later time when the overall district analysis is considered.
Graph 6 – CSO Expenditure EDPRS 3 – Public Order and Safety
10.0 EDPRS 4 – ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
The activities and the budgets for EDPRS 4 are contained in Annex 5. This sector
represents only 1.45% of total CSO expenditure and while the activities of
environmental protection are of relevance and interest nationwide, the district focus
of these activities demonstrates a pattern where the activities are focused in a very
small number of districts. Kicukiro and Huye absorb almost 30% of all CSO
environment funds and many districts have effectively no expenditure at all.
Rwanda Civil Society Mapping – Final Report
38
Graph 7– CSO Expenditure EDPRS 4 – Environmental Protection
11.0 EDPRS 5 – AGRICULTURE
The activities and the budgets for EDPRS 5 are contained in Annex 6. Overall spending
on EDPRS 5 – Agriculture is the 4th largest individual area of CSO expenditure - of the
order of RWF32.7 billion (US$54.9 million) being 13.61% of the total expenditure.
Given the overall percentage of Rwandans engaged in agricultural activity, this level of
expenditure is to be expected. However, what is not to be expected is that 3 Districts,
Huye (16.83%), Nyagatare and Bugesera (10% each) consume almost 47% of all of the
agricultural resources expended by CSOs in the agricultural sector. This proportion is
greatly in excess of any possible allocation supported by a needs based allocation and
is a glaring example of the inefficiencies of CSO intra-sectoral funds allocation. While it
cannot be doubted that every district, including Huye, Nyagatare and Bugesera, are in
need of fiscal support in the agricultural sector, it is doubted if this disproportionate
weighting in favour of three districts is in fact warranted.
Graph 8– CSO Expenditure EDPRS 5 - Agriculture
Rwanda Civil Society Mapping – Final Report
39
12.0 EDPRS 6 – INDUSTRY AND COMMERCE
The activities and the budgets for EDPRS 6 are contained in Annex 7. Industry and
commerce is not a standard area for CSO investment and activity, but EDPRS includes
tourism and within tourism is counted the expenditure by CSOs in respect of gorilla
tourism. Not surprisingly, Musanze District accounts for almost 47% of the CSO
expenditure in this sector as this is where the greatest concentration of gorillas is
located. In this case, all of the funds expended are expended by international CSOs in
respect of gorilla tourism.
Graph 9– CSO Expenditure EDPRS 6 – Industry and Commerce
13.0 EDPRS 7 – FUEL AND ENERGY
The activities and the budgets for EDPRS 7 are contained in Annex 8. Apart from the
two sectors already identified where CSOs invested no funds, EDPRS 7 – Fuel and
Energy is the sector where CSOs in fact expend the least funds, at RWF 84.8 million.
Graph 9– CSO Expenditure EDPRS 7 – Fuel and Energy
Rwanda Civil Society Mapping – Final Report
40
14.0 EDPRS 8 – FUEL AND ENERGY
No funds were expended by CSOs in this sector
15.0 EDPRS 9 – LAND HOUSING & COMMUNITY AMENITIES
The activities and the budgets for EDPRS 9 are contained in Annex 10. This is an area
the majority of spending was contained within 11 districts but as this represents 0.55%
of all CSO expenditure, it is not an area of significance.
Graph 10– CSO Expenditure EDPRS 9 – land Housing & Community Amenities
16.0 EDPRS 10 – WATER AND SANITATION
The activities and the budgets for EDPRS 10 are contained in Annex 11. The level of
expenditure is 0.63% of total, but this may disguise the overall level of investment in
the water sector as investments of water for agriculture were classified as agriculture
sector investments. The contents of this EDPRS analysis therefore relate to water and
sanitation in towns and major trading centers and these are usually the realm of
central government.
Graph 11– CSO Expenditure EDPRS 10 – Water & Sanitation
Rwanda Civil Society Mapping – Final Report
41
17.0 EDPRS 11 – YOUTH CULTURE & SPORTS
The activities and the budgets for EDPRS 11 are contained in Annex 12. Approximately
1.35% of total CSO expenditure was focused in this area and so it is to be considered
minor. While it does appear from the Annex and the graph below that the three Kigali
districts received almost all of the funding in this sector and that this should be
considered anomalous, the limited number of CSOs active in this sector can cause a
perception distortion.
Graph 12– CSO Expenditure EDPRS 11 – Youth Culture & Sports
18.0 EDPRS 12 – EDUCATION
The activities and the budgets for EDPRS 12 are contained in Annex 13. Education is
one of the largest areas of CSO investments and the analysis of the figures shows that
30.38% of all expenditure is focused in this area. The analysis shows that 9 districts are
receiving disproportionately high levels of investment compared to other districts. The
statistical average, assuming equality of districts, is 3.33% of all expenditure by district,
but Kicukiro, Nyarugenge, Gasabo, Bugesera, Kayonza, Kirehe, Ngoma and Kamonyi
have CSO levels of expenditure that do not accord to this pattern.
This level of disproportionate expenditure is hard to explain, especially when it is
remembered that CSOs that declared that their activities covered all districts or a
specified number of districts resulted in the proportional allocation of expenditure to
all districts. This can have a distorting effect on the level of expenditure in the districts
which are not specifically named and increase their apparent allocations. The
implication being that the lesser funded districts may well in fact not have received
that level of funding at all, making the disproportionate allocations even more
substantial.
Rwanda Civil Society Mapping – Final Report
42
It must also be remembered that the overall level of expenditure for the sector may be
inflated by the classification process used to assign expenditure, in that if a CSO
expended funds for water in schools, this was classified as a school (education)
expenditure.
The importance of the data is that given the very high levels of relative expenditure in
a limited number of districts, attention must be focused on the potential for the
promotion among CSOs of a relativity of allocations so as not to create aid ‘orphans’
amongst districts. The education sector strategic investment plan and other education
sector planning documents do not support this disparity of investment between
districts and it must be viewed as a matter of concern by central government as to the
reasoning that lead to this allocation spread. Again, as in other sectors, it is not to be
perceived that the districts with a higher proportional investment by CSOs did not in
fact need and benefit from that level of investment, but the pattern does raise
questions of the appropriateness of overall sectoral attention.
Graph 13– CSO Expenditure EDPRS 12 - Education
19.0 EDPRS 13 – HEALTH
The activities and the budgets for EDPRS 13 are contained in Annex 14. The analysis of
the CSO investments in this sector is of major interest as 20.52% of all expenditure is
focused in the sector, with over 50% of all expenditure being focused in two districts,
Rwanda Civil Society Mapping – Final Report
43
Bugesera and Kayonza, with another 15% expended in Kicukiro and Gasabo, meaning
that almost the entire sector expenditure is focused in four districts at the expense of
the other districts.
There can be a number of reasons for this substantial disparity between districts. The
first area is that health investments are usually expensive and a major investment (for
instance, a hospital) can distort the overall figures. Another area of potential
distortion is that CSOs can have declared that multi-year investments are in fact spread
over several years, but given this overall level of disparity, it would not substantially
impact the disparities.
The disparities are made even more glaring because some of the major CSO
investments in the sector were spread over all districts as a matter of allocation. For
instance, a CSO was engaged in a multi-million dollar invest that related to the supply
of medical supplies which was spread over all districts. This means that the overall
health sector expenditure by CSOs is even more heavily waited to the districts which
benefitted the most from CSO expenditure.
The impact of this overall spread of CSO investments means that ‘aid orphans’ are
clearly created in the majority of districts. The concern for central government will be
the need to consider this great disparity in terms of overall central allocations in the
future. This is only possible if the central government has accurate figures of annual
expenditure and this can only be achieved if the recommendation sin respect of CSO
registration is implemented.
Graph 14– CSO Expenditure EDPRS 13 - Health
Rwanda Civil Society Mapping – Final Report
44
20.0 EDPRS 14 – SOCIAL PROTECTION
The activities and the budgets for EDPRS 14 are contained in Annex 15. This sector was
one of the major areas of expenditure by CSOs and represents 24.59% of all CSO
expenditure, but as is noted in the graph, almost all of the expenditure was focused in
Gasabo and Bugesera. While Gasabo has a substantial population and there is without
doubt a need for expenditure in this sector in that district, it is not possible to explain
the overwhelming level of investment proportionately that has favoured that district in
this sector. Classification does not appear to be a substantial issue in terms of
allocations of expenditure and this is an area for further investigation by central
government.
Graph 15– CSO Expenditure EDPRS 14 – Social Protection
21.0 CHALLENGES AND RECOMMENDATIONS
A series of challenges were noted that hindering the smooth running of the overall
administration of CSOs in Rwanda. They are –
(a) Poor reporting mechanisms and schedules where by periodical reports are
supposed to be submitted to the JADF and MINALOC/IMMIGRATION but are actually
not submitted. This causes a supervision bottlenecks and poor coordination of their
activities.
Rwanda Civil Society Mapping – Final Report
45
(b) There is a facilitation problem both in terms of transport and communication. This
makes it difficult for the JADF PS to effectively monitor and coordinate the activities of
all CSOs operating in districts where they are in charge.
(c) There is an issue of the JADFs feeling unempowered and lacking authority in the
execution of their work. This results in them not considering that they are able to even
bring the CSO heads together in times of need in order to streamline the operations of
CSOs.
(d) There is no clear communication mechanism between MINALOC and district JADFs
and this leads to a situation where CSOs are registered at MINALOC but are not known
at the district where they operate.
(e) There is also no clear monitoring and evaluation mechanism of the CSO activities
from MINALOC down to the district level and Umurenge level. There is no frame work
within which the activities of these CSOs can be monitored.
(f) There is also challenge of the legal framework in respect of CSO registration and
operation. This has been dealt with elsewhere.
(g) For local CSOs, there is no steady stream of income and this makes their employees
work as volunteers.
The recommendations are-
1. That the CSO registration process be changed so that it undertaken through the
Development Assistance Database so that all CSO information is captured annually as
part of the annual registration process. This will annually update all data relating to
activates and areas of focus and will be a valuable tool for all stakeholders when
determining their selection of sectoral investments.
2. That the implementation laws necessary to implement the CSO organic law be
drafted and passed as soon as reasonably practicable.
Rwanda Civil Society Mapping – Final Report
46
3. Further investigations be undertaken to determine the value for money in terms of
sectoral investments by CSOs against the respective level of central government.
4. Increase/deepen CSO involvement in the Sector Working Groups (SWGs).
5. JADFs do not feel empowered, they are weak by perception and therefore they
should be strengthened in order for them to effectively execute their duties. An
example here is the feeling of being powerless to ask for periodical reports. This is an
issue that was raised by the JADFs.
6. Improve on facilitation of the JADFs to improve coordination, monitoring and
evaluation. This is interms of transport and communication.
22.0 CONCLUSIONS
This CSO mapping exercise has not been definitive as it was not a census. There are
CSOs that have not been captured and there may well be classification issues in
respect of overall expenditure. However, it is clear that the recommendations in
respect of the gathering of accurate annual data in respect of CSOs must be a priority
matter for central government given the overall level of expenditure by CSOs in some
of the priority sectors.
The completion of this CSO mapping exercise has provided for the very first time
extensive data on the operations of CSOs in Rwanda, but not to the degree of detail
that may be wanted by some stakeholders. This can only be achieved by an actual
census, which is both time consuming and expensive. It is much more relevant to
Rwanda to have an annual picture of overall CSO expenditure that is complete and
accurate In order that central government can both engage CSOs in dialogue over
activities and areas of focus, but also to consider its own allocations, which must be
based on solid and robust data.
The importance of this exercise for CSOs themselves in Rwanda is that the data
provided by this CSO mapping exercise demonstrates very clearly the importance of
civil society in service delivery in vital sectors within Rwanda and CSOs are to be seen
as major stakeholders in the overall development agenda. CSOs will be able to use this
Rwanda Civil Society Mapping – Final Report
47
data to further their discussions and interactions with development partners and
central government in terms of enhancing the focus and relevance of their activities.
Further work is required in respect of the value for money that CSOs bring to the
development agenda in Rwanda. The scope of this mapping exercise demonstrates the
importance of CSOs, but not whether they represent value for money in terms of their
activities. This can only be done by a sectoral approach which compares the activities
of central and local governments to comparable CSO activities in the each sector. This
mapping exercise offers no comment on this aspect because it was a matter that was
well outside the scope of the exercise, but this is an area that requires substantial
further consideration and is one that should be undertaken jointly by CSOs and
government to determine those areas of activity where there are advantages for
activities to be undertaken by the stakeholders.
Rwanda Civil Society Mapping – Final Report
48
ANNEX 1 TERMS OF REFERENCE
Objective The overall objective of this assignment is to contribute to the following:
a. Increased understanding of the impacts of the civil society activities in Rwanda through aggregating the Civil Society Organizations (CSOs) activities;
b. Harmonized distribution of activities by the CSOs and coordinated activities and programmes through mapping out the activities sector by sector;
c. Informed future planning processes of the CSOs and required funding through assessing the gaps that currently exist;
d. Informing better the Government and Platform planning process by quantifying the CSO contribution in the national estimates;
e. Quantify the CSO contribution in the national estimates; f. Use the information generated from the study to form the basis of the lobby and advocacy; g. To assess where CSO have a comparative advantage so that in its complementary role with the
government, the latter comes in where there is a gap to fill. This complementary role will enhance specialization in different sectors by different stakeholders.
Background The Rwandan Civil Society has been in existence from 1956 when its first segments were established in form of farmers associations who were answerable to the church. It grew to sizable proportions when several associations, Community Based Organizations (CSOs), Non-Government Organizations (NGOs), formed umbrellas that brought together NGOs and CSOs with common interest. This organizational set up left CSO deprived of the capacity to coordinate and engage with different partners .This gap made the CSO not only perceived as weak but also vulnerable. Motivated by a desire to combine their efforts to contribute to the integral development of the country and promotion of the rule of law, 8 umbrellas , CCOAIB, CESTRAR, CLADHO, IBUKA, the Union IMBARAGA, CEJP, THE PRESS HOUSE and PRO-FEMMES TWESE HAMWE initiated the idea of setting up a platform that would enable them to achieve their mission. Thereafter, seven other umbrellas and organization networks became members. This was realized at the Constituent Assembly held on July 9, 2004 when CS members came together and formed the Rwanda Civil Society Platform-RCSP that brings together all actors of the civil society. It was created as a framework for exchange and dialogue between member organizations and between the latter and their partners. Mission and Objectives of RCSP The Platform's mission is to serve as a framework for dialogue, reflection on common issues, information exchange, mutual support and reinforcement and build a valid interlocutor to various partners of the civil society. The objectives of the Platform are;
Promote solidarity and harmonize relations between civil society organizations;
Analyze the context and challenges the population of Rwanda has faced and /or is facing with a view to adopt common position and strategy for specific actions;
Establish and maintain an information and communication system to enable the civil society to achieve its mission in close collaboration with all partners;
Develop an effective partnership at national, regional and international levels;
Perform the representation and advocacy mandate of the Civil Society. Despite the establishment of the Platform, organizations and umbrella activities remained individualized and isolated and their location, nature and, quantities remained unknown. This made the civil society overall contribution to national development shrouded in mystery and hence the doubt of the usefulness of the CSO as development partners. It is against this background a survey is to be undertaken in order to map out civil society activities, areas of intervention, and their quantities. This study arises out of the prevailing concern of the relevance and role of the civil society in national
Rwanda Civil Society Mapping – Final Report
49
economic development and poverty reduction. This will not only help the Platform but also the government and Development Partners by providing useful overview of the support and activities undertaken by the Civil Society Organizations. This will include activities undertaken by national NGOs and those INGOs that implement activities on the grassroots. Scope of Work The selected firm or team of consultants will work under the direct supervision of the Rwanda Civil Society Platform and will work in close collaboration with the Aid Coordination Unit (ACU) of the United Nations in Rwanda Specifically, they will perform, but limited to:
Map out activities of the civil society organizations in all the districts of Rwanda, domain of intervention and come up with the pattern of their distribution;
Gather flow of CSO funding information for both LNGOs and INGSOs (disbursement information) and activities from relevant Government and district entities (i.e. MINALOC, Directorate General of Immigration and Emigration) and from CSO organizations;
Assess activities and source of their funding;
Meet members of the civil society district by district to discuss their programs, funding opportunities available, challenges, best practices and way forward;
Document results and impacts of CSO activities;
Work out details of the employment statistics within individual organizations constituting the Civil Society;
Gather qualitative information on the activities of organizations working in governance, Advocacy and human rights;
Help Organize and moderate a user workshop to present and discuss the draft report at a national workshop of members and stakeholders and to validate the draft report.
Methodology: A participatory approach will be used involving different stake holders. The following can be recommended:
Use of Structured questionnaires;
Interviews;
Use of organization reports and work plans
Use of available secondary data at the district and in ministries (particularly the data submitted to the Ministry of Local Administration and Social Affairs (MINALOC) and the Ministry of Foreign Affairs (MINAFEET) upon the CSO registration process;
Meeting with government officials, donors, CSO leadership at organization level, the private media, Faith based organizations, CSOs, Trade unions;
Field visits Reporting and working languages: The consultation will be carried out in English and the finalized report submitted in the same language; Kinyarwanda should be the field language for the structured questionnaires Outputs and Deliverables The following outputs are as expected from the consultancy:
CSO contribution in economic development and poverty reduction is known, coordinated and organized which will inform the CS effective engagement in public policy dialogue and advocacy;
CSO activities are coordinated and there is no duplication and overlap thereof;
Areas/sectors where CS has strengths are known and exploited and where weaknesses are identified are strengthened to help in future planning process;
Donor funding by sector easily identified. Specific Deliverables:
An inception report showing the consultant’s proposed approach and methodology for the
Rwanda Civil Society Mapping – Final Report
50
execution of the consultancy. The methodology will provide details of persons to be interviewed, methods and tools for interview and a calendar for the service;
Prepare a study draft report;
Moderation of a workshop to present and discuss the report; and
Prepare the final report Qualifications The candidates must demonstrate the following qualifications and experience:
A strong company profile and a team of consultants with a minimum of Masters Degree of education in Social Sciences, Public Policy Analysis, Economics, and Public Administration;
Have at least ten (10) years progressive experience work in areas of strategic thinking, strategy development, organizational capacity analysis and development;
Be familiar with the theory of change influencing processes;
Have proven experience in the use of participatory qualitative and quantitative assessment/analytic methodologies such as outcome mapping, adult learning and organizational capacity assessment;
Have knowledge/ expertise of business development and resource planning and to have done this as well for not-for profit organizations;
Have a wide experience in rights based programming, democratic governance and NGO development work;
Have good skills in public policy analysis and good knowledge of the Rwanda Governance context.
Key Competencies
Good understanding of the Civil Society Organizations;
In-depth substantive knowledge of the political environment and challenges facing the Civil Society Organizations in Africa;
Ability to transfer knowledge and skills to colleagues and partners;
Strong written and oral communication skills;
Strong interpersonal skills demonstrated by the ability to gain the assistance and cooperation of others in a team endeavour;
ability to build trust through operating with transparency and creating and open, positive and enabling environment;
ability to work in a multi-cultural environment with sensitivity and respect for diversity;
Demonstrated ability to establish priorities and to plan, coordinate and monitor tasks to achieve results;
Sound judgement and decision making skills;
Demonstrated ability to establish priorities and to plan, coordinate and monitor tasks to achieve result.
Remuneration and Other Considerations The successful firm (Team of consultants) will start his/her assignment as soon as possible following the completion of the recruitment process. Submissions will be accepted from Firms or Teams of Consultants only The Successful Result of this Process will be a Contract for services. Defining an initial period of Three (3) months worked. Terms of Payment for this consultancy will be a daily lump sum based on International Consultancy scale payable as follows: a) 25 % of the total contract amount to be paid upon submission and acceptance of an inception report showing the consultant’s proposed approach and methodology for the execution of the consultancy. The methodology will provide details of persons to be interviewed, methods and tools for interview and a calendar for the service; b) 25 % of the total contract amount to be paid upon submission and acceptance of the study draft report;
Rwanda Civil Society Mapping – Final Report
51
c) 25 % of the total contract amount to be paid upon completion of moderation of a workshop to present and discuss the report; d) 25 % of the total contract amount to be paid upon submission and acceptance of the final consultancy report.
Rwanda Civil Society Mapping – Final Report
52
ANNEX 2 INTERVIEW QUESTIONNAIRE
Background The purpose of this study is to map out civil society activities, areas of intervention, and their quantities to assess and consider the prevailing concern of the relevance and role of the civil society in national economic development and poverty reduction. This will not only help the Platform but also the government and Development Partners by providing useful overview of the support and activities undertaken by CSOs. This will include activities undertaken by national NGOs and those INGOs that implement activities at the grassroots. The CSO mapping study focuses on the following issues:
Increased understanding of the impacts of the civil society activities in Rwanda through aggregating the Civil Society Organizations (CSOs) activities;
Harmonized distribution of activities by the CSOs and coordinated activities and programmes through mapping out the activities sector by sector;
Informed future planning processes of the CSOs and required funding through assessing the gaps currently exist Informing better the Government and Platform planning process by quantifying the CSO contribution in the national estimates
Quantify the CSO contribution in the national estimates.
Use the information generated from the study to form the basis of the lobby and advocacy.
To assess where CSOs have a comparative advantage so that in its complementary role with the government, the latter comes in where there is a gap to fill. This complementary role will enhance specialization in different sectors by different stakeholders.
We are therefore keen to understand the activities of the CSO in Rwanda and their contribution to the general development agenda, as well as to understand how effectively they have currently aligned they activities with the national development goals of for example the EDPRS.
CSO MAPPING QUESTIONNAIRE
Organisation Name:
Organisation Incorporation and Registration Details:
Registered with MINALOC
Registered with Immigration Department
Incorporation Date
Incorporation Place
Charter/Memorandum of Association
Organisation Contact Details:
Address
Office Phone
Office fax
URL
Email Contact Addresses
Umbrella Organisation Membership
FY
Districts of Operation:
Membership Details:
Primary respondent:
Name
Title
Address
Cell Phone
Email Contact
Sector (Use GoR sectoral classifications)
Rwanda Civil Society Mapping – Final Report
53
CSO MAPPING QUESTIONNAIRE
Area (s) of specialisation/sector:
Strategic Plans/Vision Statements (Tick if provided)
FY 2008
FY 2009
FY 2009-2010
Annual Work plan Checklist (Tick if provided)
AWP FY 2008
AWP FY 2009
AWP FY 2009-2010
Annual Budget Checklist (Tick if provided)
Budget FY 2008
Budget FY 2009
Budget FY 2009-2010
Quarterly Progress Report Checklist (Tick if provided)
QPRs FY 2008
QPRs FY 2009
QPRs FY 2009-2010
Quarterly Financial Report Checklist (Tick if provided)
QFRs FY 2008
QFRs FY 2009
QFRs FY 2009-2010
Annual Report Checklist (Tick if provided)
Annual Report FY 2008
Annual Report FY 2009
Annual Report FY 2009-2010
Audit Report Checklist (Tick if provided)
Audit Report FY 2008
Audit Report FY 2009
Audit Report FY 2009-2010
Reports to GoR (MINALOC, Immigration etc) (Tick if provided)
FY 2008
FY 2009
FY 2009-2010
Major source of Funding:
FY 2008
FY 2009
FY 2009-2010
Staffing Establishment Year – 2008
No Total Wage Bill inc allowances
Management
Programmatic
Technical
Secretarial
Ancillary
Year – 2009
No Total Wage Bill inc allowances
Management
Programmatic
Technical
Secretarial
Ancillary
Year – 2010
No Total Wage Bill inc allowances
Management
Rwanda Civil Society Mapping – Final Report
54
CSO MAPPING QUESTIONNAIRE
Programmatic
Technical
Secretarial
Ancillary
Additional Questions
1. Who is your major source of funding and what is the size of your budget for past year (FY)?
2. How would you describe the current activities and other development objectives in the last 12 Months (FY)? Do you have strategic plans or implementation/execution reports?
3. In what ways, and to what extent, is the results framework for the EDPRS an improvement over previous approaches to your activities in Rwanda?
4. Is there evidence that the development of the results framework of the EDPRS have improved your performance, or influenced policy and expenditure decisions?
5. How were the activities designed?
6. What are the main strengths and weaknesses of the EDPRS as opposed to CSO activities’ implementation? How would you rate your contribution to the National development?
Rwanda Civil Society Mapping – Final Report
55
ANNEX 3 EDPRS 1 – GENERAL PUBLIC SERVICE
Name International or Local
Registered (Y/N)
Activities Districts Budget as Reported RWF unless otherwise
stated
Budget RWf
THE URBAN INSTITUTE
International Y Local Government and civic participation strengthening
All districts of Rwanda $3,554,070 2,114,671,650
NATIONAL DEMOCRATIC INSTITUTE(NDI)
International Y Political Parties and Governance All districts of Rwanda $500,000 297,500,000
SOCIAL & SCIENTIFIC SYSTEMS Inc.
International Y M&E of NGOs funded by USAID All districts of Rwanda $1,361,830 810,288,850
NORWEGIAN PEOPLE'S AID
International Y CSO capacity development and democratic Governance
All districts of Rwanda 2,122,061,532 2,122,061,532
SNV RWANDA International Y Facilitating JADF activities Gasabo, Gatsibo, Rwamagana, Ngoma, Kirehe, Ngororero, Rutsiro, Karongi, Nyamasheke, Rusuzi, Gicumbi, Gakenke, Rulindo, Muhanga, Kamonyi, Nyanza, Gisagara, Huye, Nyaruguru & Ruhango
€1,737,000 1,422,603,000
SEARCH FOR COMMON GROUND
International Y Conflict resolution All districts $321,288 192.772,800
CENTRE CANADIEN D'TUDE ET DE COOPERATION INTERNATIONALE (CECI)
International Y Good governance and economic development
Nyamagabe & Nyaruguru districts
$3,000,000 1,785,000,000
Trocaire International Y Governance and Human Rights All districts country wide
Euros 531,298 435,133,062
Rwanda Civil Society Mapping – Final Report
56
Name International or Local
Registered (Y/N)
Activities Districts Budget as Reported RWF unless otherwise
stated
Budget RWf
INTERNEWS EUROPE International Y Media(train communications staffs & spokespersons from ministries, police, government agencies in Media relations,..) and Health
Gasabo Euros 350,000 208,250,000
CARE International Rwanda
International Y PPIMA project Nyaruguru £ 100,000 97,300,000
Y Total International RWF
9,292,808,094
Transparency Rwanda
Local Y Governance (Conduct studies, surveys and procurement of sensitization materials for ant corruption crusades
All districts country wide
346,716,855 346,716,855
Centre for Communication on Peace and Cohesion in Rwanda
Local Y Admin &Operation Kigali city 29,475,000 29,475,000
Rwanda Link Local Y Peace and Reconciliation Kigali city, Gicumbi 7,600,000 7,600,000
Rwanda Link Local Y Salaries Kigali City and Gicumbi Province
1,380,000 1,380,000
MULINDI JAPAN ONE LOVE
Local Y Admin &Operation Kigali city 187,700 111,681,500
REACH ORGANISATION IN RWANDA
Local Y Good Governance (unity & Reconciliation) youth seminar, released prisoners and survivors, supporting unity Groups, construction of Kayonza centre for peace
Kayonza, Kirehe, Rulindo
45,100,000 45,100,000
REACH Local Y Administrative Expenses Gasabo district 16,800,000 16,800,000
Rwanda Civil Society Mapping – Final Report
57
Name International or Local
Registered (Y/N)
Activities Districts Budget as Reported RWF unless otherwise
stated
Budget RWf
ORGANISATION IN RWANDA
Centre Professionnel d'Appui à la Bonne Gouvernance
Local Y Good Governance (research on Good Governance and community development, module production, capacity building
Bugesera, Gasabo 190,000,000 190,000,000
Never Again-Rwanda
Local Y Good governance (encouraging Youth in Democratic Process
Kicukiro, Gasabo & Nyagatare
45,394 27,009,430
Action for Integration Health Development (AHID)
Local Y Unity and Reconciliation Gasabo 1,900,000 1,900,000
GREAT LAKES CENTER FOR CULTURE, PEACE AND DEVELOPMENT (GLCPD)
Local Y Governance (unity and reconciliation in secondary schools, human rights sensitisation and democracy in Great Lakes region, Staff Training
Nyaruguru, Gasabo 41,760 24,847,200
BUSINESS MEN'S FELLOWSHIP
Local Y Governance (unity and reconciliation, Trauma hearing), Capacity Building
Kicukiro 10,670,000 10,670,000
Collectif des ligues et Associations de defense des Droits de l'hommes au Rwanda (CLADHO)
Local Y Governance: Budget Process Training to MPs and Local leaders, Human rights training
All and special for Rwamagana, Bugesera, Nyarugenge, Kamonyi and Huye
642,939,163 642,939,163
Youth League for Peace and Conflict Resolution in Great Lakes Region (LPGL)
Local Y Capacity Building: Unity and Reconciliation, Public and Private, HIV/AIDS Control
Gasabo, Huye, Musanze, Rubavu, Nyarugenge, Karongi, Bugesera
15,400,000 15,400,000
JYA MU BANDI Local Y Capacity Building Gasabo 3,200,000 3,200,000
Rwanda Civil Society Mapping – Final Report
58
Name International or Local
Registered (Y/N)
Activities Districts Budget as Reported RWF unless otherwise
stated
Budget RWf
MWANA
Pilgrim Center for Healing and Reconciliation Ministries
Local Y Capacity Building All 54,000 32,130,000
Caritas-RWANDA Local Y Capacity Building Gicumbi, Rusizi, Nyamagabe, Rutsiro, Kigali Ville, Huye
159,679,605 159,679,605
Association des Veuves du Genocide Agahozo (AVEGA)
Local Y General: administrative Gasabo 358,018,768 358,018,768
African Evangelistic Enterprise (AEE-Rwanda)
Local Y Governance: Unity and reconciliation mainstreaming in schools and Churches
Bugesera, Muhanga, Huye, Nyamagabe, Rubavu, Gatsibo
78,759,827 78,759,827
AS WE FORGIVE Local Y Unity and Reconciliation (thru Radio Programs, development projects)
Gasabo, Bugesera, Kamonyi, Huye, Rubavu, Gicumbi, Rwamagana, Kicukiro
150,000 89,250,000
Urunana/Triat d'Union
Local Y Monitoring and Evaluation Rwamagana, Kayonza, Gasabo, Kicukiro, Nyarugenge, Bugesera, Gatsibo, Nyagatare, Gisagara, Huye
500,000 500,000
Concern and Care for the Needy in Rwanda
Local Y Capacity Building (and sensitisation)
Rubavu, Rutsiro, Karongi, Nyamasheke, Rusizi, Muhanga, Kamonyi
53,500,000 53,500,000
Rwanda Network of People Living with HIV/AIDS (RRP+)
Local Y Capacity Building in cooperatives and Good Governance, Justice
Nyarugenge, Kicikuro, Gasabo, Bugesera, Rwamagana, Gatsibo, Rulindo, Gicumbi,
89,757 53,405,415
Rwanda Civil Society Mapping – Final Report
59
Name International or Local
Registered (Y/N)
Activities Districts Budget as Reported RWF unless otherwise
stated
Budget RWf
Gakenke, Nyabihu, Ngororero, Karongi, Rubavu, Rutsiro, Muhanga, Kamonyi, Ruhango, Nyamagabe, Gisagara
Solace Ministries Local Y Capacity Building: Leadership counselling and training and research
Kigali Ville, Nyanza, Bugesera
42,020,000 42,020,000
FORUM DES FEMMES RWANDAISE PARLEMENTAIRE
Local N Support to advocacy, development of legislation and general awareness raising
All districts 11,970,000 11,970,000
RESEAU DES PARLEMENTAIRES RWANDAIS POUR LA POPULATION ET DEVELOPMENT
Local N Support to advocacy and sensitization of population issues (RH, HVI, population growt)
All districts 27,626,930 27,626,930
Rwanda Governance Advisory Council
Local N Joint Governance Assessment All districts 124,950,000 124,950,000
Total Local RWf 2,506,529,693
Rwanda Civil Society Mapping – Final Report
60
ANNEX 4 EDPRS 3 – PUBLIC ORDER AND SAFETY
Name International
or Local Registered
(Y/N) Activities Districts Budget as Reported
RWF unless otherwise stated Budget RWf
AVOCATS SANS FRONTIERES International Y Human rights & Justice
All Districts €373,015 305,499,285
MINES ADVISORY GROUP International Y Conventional weapons destruction & training
Kicukiro & Gatsibo $191,752 114,092,440
INTERNATIONAL JUSTICE MISSION
International Y Justice to prosecute cases of violence against minors
Kigali city districts $779,139 463,587,705
GOOD NEWS JAIL AND PRISON MINISTRY
International Y Preaching Repentance, Discipleship, Counselling and Social Welfare Activities
Kigali, Muhanga, Mpanga, & other prisons
$22,350 13,186,500
FONDATION DIDE International Y Support to minors in Gitarama prison
Muhanga 18,952,710 18,952,710
RCN-JUSTICE & DÉMOCRATIE International Y Support to the Justice sector; Institutions and Civil society
All provinces ; various districts €560,000 476,000,000
PENAL REFORM International Y Justice & Monitoring TIG
Nyarugenge, Gasabo, Kicukiro, Kamonyi, Muhanga, Ruhango, Nyanza, Nyamagabe, Huye, Gisagra, Nyaruguru, Rulindo, Gicumbi, Burera, Gakenke, Musanze, Rwamagana, Kayonza, Ngoma, Kirehe, Bugesera, Nyagatare, Nyabihu ,Ngororero, Rubavu, Rutsiro, Nyamasheke
€852,101 697,870,719
Rwanda Civil Society Mapping – Final Report
61
Name International
or Local Registered
(Y/N) Activities Districts Budget as Reported
RWF unless otherwise stated Budget RWf
LIGUE DES DROITS DE LA PERSONNE DANS LA REGION DES GRANDS LACS (LDGL)
International Y Observation of human rights
All Districts $500,702 297,917,690
Total International RFW 2,387,107,049
Kunda Umwana Local Y Human Rights- train parents in child rights,
All Districts 18,000,000 18,000,000
Young Women's Christian Association of Rwanda
Local Y Human Rights (Educating children about their rights
Muhanga, Ruhango, Kamonyi, Rwamagana, Nyabihu an Kayonza and Huye
5,296,000 5,296,000
ASSIST Rwanda Local Y Human Rights (training modules on peace building on youth, training on Human and child rights, creation of cultural clubs
All Districts 319,241,000 319,241,000
Association Rwandaise des Travailleurs Chretiens Feminins
Local Y Training in literacy and human rights and Injustice against Women
Gakenke, Muhanga, Kamonyi, Gisagara, Huye, Bugesera, Rwamagana, Nyarugenge, Kicukiro and Gasabo Districts.
78,674,900 78,674,900
Association Non Crime-Rwanda
Local Y Children’s Rights (sensitizing child rights to mothers in prisons.
All Districts 46,365,750 46,365,750
Never Again-Rwanda Local Y Human Rights (Training on Human Rights)
Kigali €20,000.00 16,380,000
HELP LIFE Local Y Human Rights (chid rights and education
Nyarugenge, Nyakabanda districts
48,629,000 48,629,000
VISION FOR AFRICA.ORG Local Y Human Rights Kicukiro district 6,000,000 6,000,000
Rwanda Civil Society Mapping – Final Report
62
Name International
or Local Registered
(Y/N) Activities Districts Budget as Reported
RWF unless otherwise stated Budget RWf
(training on law related to families
Youth League for Peace and Conflict Resolution in Great Lakes Region (LPGL)
Local Y Human rights, genocide prevention
Kigali Ville 59,900,000 59,900,000
JYA MU BANDI MWANA Local Y Child Rights Gasabo, Rulindo, Nyarugenge, Kicukiro
1,500,000 1,500,000
Association Ejo Nzamera Nte Local Y Human Rights awareness
Ngoma 1,000,000 1,000,000
Association des Veuves du Genocide Agahozo (AVEGA)
Local Y Justice: Genocide survivors
All Districts 47,305,000 47,305,000
Urunana/Triat d'Union Local Y Children’s Rights (sensitizing child rights and mothers inheritance)
Rwamagana, Kayonza 29,828,000 29,828,000
LAWYER OF HOPE Local Y Legal support to prisoners legal assistance and capacity building in law
Gasabo, Nyarugenge 7,071,000 7,071,000
ACTION CHRETIENNE POUR LE DEVELOPMENT COMMUNATAIRE AU RWANDA (ACDCR)
Local Y Capacity Building: Training, Peace and Development, Justice and non-violence
Kicukiro 11,000,000 11,000,000
AJPRODHO-JIUKIRWA Local Y Justice Nyagatare 33,810,000 33,810,000
Civil society Platform Local N Monitoring of the presidential elections All Districts $300,000 178,500,000
Rwanda Men's resource centre Local N Study on gender based violence and masculinity and All Districts $103,753 61,733,035
Rwanda Civil Society Mapping – Final Report
63
Name International
or Local Registered
(Y/N) Activities Districts Budget as Reported
RWF unless otherwise stated Budget RWf
trainings
Imbuto Foundation Local N Monitoring and evaluation expert Kigali $162,488 96,680,360
Total Local RFW 1,066,914,045
Rwanda Civil Society Mapping – Final Report
64
ANNEX 5 EDPRS 4 – ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
Name International or Local
Registered (Y/N)
Activities Districts Budget as Reported
RWF unless otherwise
stated
Budget RWf
SUSTAIN RWANDA-ASSOCIATION FOR THE PROMOTION OF SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT IN RWANDA
International Y Protection and sustainable use of the extraordinary biodiversity of Rwanda.
Huye, Nyaruguru 731,840,000 731,840,000
ACDI/VOCA International Y Land use and protection Karongi, Ngororero, Nyamagabe
$807,977 476,706,430
Vi-LIFE PROGRAMME RWANDA International Y Land use, environment and climate change through radical terraces and tree planting
Rulindo ,Gicumbi, Gasabo 469,200,000 469,200,000
CARE International Rwanda International Y EEEGL Burera, Musanze, Nyabihu & Rubavu
US$ 146,799 87,345,405
CARE International Rwanda International Y CASE Huye, Gisagara, Nyamagabe, Nyamagabe
US$100,000 59,500,000
World Vision International Rwanda Program
International Y Biogas installation in 3 Secondary Schools and tree plantation
Bugesera 45,000,000 45,000,000
Total International RFW 1,869,591,835
Africa Transformation Network Local Y Environment (producing charcoal from farm waste, Rocket stoves,
Kicukiro 2,500,000 2,500,000
Rwanda Green Foundation Local Y Agroforestry environment Bugesera, 13,800,000 13,800,000
Prison Fellowship Rwanda
Local Y Environment (sensitization in Reconciliation Villages about Soil Erosion
Kayonza District 880,000 880,000
Rwanda Civil Society Mapping – Final Report
65
Name International or Local
Registered (Y/N)
Activities Districts Budget as Reported
RWF unless otherwise
stated
Budget RWf
Association pour les conseils en developpements
Local Y Environment ( Tree plantation Ngororero, Rubavu, Nyabihu
108,900,000 108,900,000
Youth Forum Sustainable Development
Local Y Environment, Protect and Preserve Environment through sports and Films
All Districts 28,500,000 28,500,000
Inter-church Youth Foundation
Local Y Environment-( Keep Kigali Clean and Green) planting of trees and Sensitization on Environmental Protection
Kicukiro ,Kayonza 17,549,200 17,549,200
Partners in Agriculture and Environment
Local Y Environment (Restoring Social Economic Environmental Rewards for the communities
Nyabihu $49,000.00 29,155,000
Association Abizerana
Local Y Environment (Modern Fire wood) Nyarugenge 7,700,000 7,700,000
Rural Environment and Development Organisation
Local Y Environmental Protection( training of artisans on environmental protection
All Districts $62,000.00 36,890,000
Action for Integration Health Development (AHID)
Local Y Environment (Train communities on water treatment, water source protection, environmental protection
Gasabo 4,700,000 4,700,000
Rwanda Development Solutions (RDS)
Local Y Environment, Protect and Preserve Environment
Bugesera, Rwamagana, Kamonyi and Ruhango
43,754,000 43,754,000
VISION FOR AFRICA.ORG Local Y Environment (bamboo and tree planting
Kicukiro 6,000,000 6,000,000
Cooperate Out of Poverty (Coop-Rwanda)
Local Y Environment (Tree planting, build progressive, & bench terraces, sensitizing school children on importance of environment,
Kigali. 222,078,141 222,078,141
Rwanda Civil Society Mapping – Final Report
66
Name International or Local
Registered (Y/N)
Activities Districts Budget as Reported
RWF unless otherwise
stated
Budget RWf
promoting ECOSAN
Abajambo Local Y Environmental Care Rwamagana, Bugesera, Gasabo
1,000,000 1,000,000
Action Nord-Sud Rwanda
Local Y Environmental Burera 100,000,000 100,000,000
Power of Love/ Urukundo association
Local Y Environment Kicukiro 560,000,000 560,000,000
GREENWISE - International Local Y Environment: Waste management at Nyanza Dumpsite
Kigali Ville 46,750,000 46,750,000
Association Ejo Nzamera Nte Local Y Environment Ngoma and Kirehe $24,500 14,577,500
Caritas-RWANDA Local Y Environnemental Support Rubavu, Gicumbi, Kigali, Musanze, Rutsiro
105,966,008 105,966,008
AHLUL BAIT ISLAMIC FOUNDATION
Local Y Environmental Gasabo 6,800,000 6,800,000
Action Pour le Developpement Rural Integre(DUHAMIC-ADRI)
Local Y Agroforestry( Environment) Nyaruguru and Rulindo 265,300,467 265,300,467
Rwanda Environmental NGO's Forum RENGOF)
Local Y Environment: Capacity Building, climatic change adaptation
Nyabihu 260,000 154,700,000
WILDLIFE CONSERVATION SOCIETY
International N Environment Karongi, Nyaruguru, Nyamagabe, Rusizi, Nyamasheke
$41,075.68 24,440,027
Total Local RFW
1,801,940,343
Rwanda Civil Society Mapping – Final Report
67
ANNEX 6 EDPRS 5 – AGRICULTURE
Name International or
Local
Registered (Y/N)
Activities Districts
Budget as Reported RWF unless stated
otherwise Budget RWf
GARDENS FOR HEALTH INTERNATIONAL
International Y Assisting district to have community gardens and home gardens, Education and Training in nutrition and sustainable agriculture techniques(training for cooperatives on sustainable agriculture techniques)
Gasabo & Nyamagabe districts
$86,553.84 51,499,535
GERMANY AGRO ACTION
International Y Rural and agricultural development Huye district $6,720,000.00 3,998,400,000
VETERINAIRE SANS FRONTIERES
International Y Animal Health Huye, Nyamagabe &Gisagara districts.
€175,110 143,415,090
A.C.O.R.D International Y Decentralisation, good governance, unity & reconciliation as well as food security and women's rights towards land and issues.
Kamonyi, Bugesera, Musanze, Ngororero
282,183,762 282,183,762
TROCAIRE International Y Food security (seed multiplication, food production, food processing & marketing
Kamonyi, Nyanza, Nyaruguru, Nyamagabe, Huye, Nyagatare, Gatsibo, Muhanga, Burera, Gisagara, Nyabihu, Rubavu, Gasabo districts
€511,478 409,182,400
TECHNOSERVE International Y Coffee farming Kirehe, Ngoma, Rwamagana, Rulindo, Nyanza, Kamonyi, Ruhango, Gisagara, Huye, Ngororero, Nyabihu,
$2,208,932 1,314,314,540
Rwanda Civil Society Mapping – Final Report
68
Name International or
Local
Registered (Y/N)
Activities Districts
Budget as Reported RWF unless stated
otherwise Budget RWf
Rusizi, & Nyamasheke Districts
LAND O' LAKES,INC International Y Dairy(engage farmers in dairy-related income generating activities for food security and livelihoods)
Nationally and Nyagatare/Gatsibo districts
$1,300,000 773,500,000
CIAT (CENTRO INTERNATIONAL DE AGRICULTURA TROPICAL)
International Y Agricultural research for rural Development
Nyabihu, Burera, Musanze, Gakenke, Gatsibo, Rwamagana, Bugesera, Kirehe, Kayonza, Rusizi, Gisagara, Huye, Nyanza, Ruhango, Kamonyi
$23,278,000 13,850,410,000
HEIFER INTERNATIONAL RWANDA
International N Dairy Enterprise development and value chain management marketing & distribution of dairy goats and cows
Nyagatare,Rwamagana,Kayonza,Kirehe,Gicumbi,Musanze,Rulindo,Ngoma,Gakenke,Nyamagabe, Ngororero
$1,750,218 1,041,379,710
TUBURA - One Acre Fund
International Y Agriculture seed and fertilizer provision, training of agronomists, provision of materials for small agricultural projects
Nyamasheke, Karongi, Rusizi, Rutsiro, Nyabihu
$855,000 504,450,000
SECOND A COW RWANDA
International Y Agriculture & Livestock Rulindo, Rwamagana, Kayonza, Gasabo, Kirehe, Bugesera & Nyanza
350,000,000 350,000,000
VETERINAIRES SANS FRONTIERES BELGIQUE (VSF/B)
International Y Animal health (supply material & veterinary drugs, train animal health workers)
Southern province, Huye district
€175,110 143,415,090
Rwanda Civil Society Mapping – Final Report
69
Name International or
Local
Registered (Y/N)
Activities Districts
Budget as Reported RWF unless stated
otherwise Budget RWf
L'ESPERANCE CHILDREN'S AID RWANDA
International Y Agriculture(development of fruit production,
Karongi district $73,000 43,435,000
PADAB International N Agriculture Bugesera $3,277,311 1,950,000,000
Bamporeze International N Agriculture Bugesera 40,000,000 40,000,000
Ex-Food for the Hungry International
International N Agriculture Kamonyi 60,298,032 60,298,032
SNV International Y Agriculture Kamonyi $9,019 7,386,561
TEARFUND UK International N Agriculture, Disaster Management Kamonyi 2,659,238 2,659,238
CRS International N Agriculture Kamonyi 8,233,228 8,233,228
CSC UGAMA International N Agriculture Kamonyi 25,800,000 25,800,000
DUHAMIC-ADRI International N Agriculture Kamonyi $20,000 19,240,000
SYNDICAT INGABO International N Agriculture Kamonyi 7,111,668 7,111,668
UCF/YWA International N Health, Agriculture Kamonyi 9,992,000 9,992,000
Global Civic Sharing International N Water, Food Kamonyi 3,624,000 3,624,000
SYNDICAT INGABO International N Agriculture Ruhango 1,100,000 1,100,000
TECHNOSERVE International Y Agriculture Ruhango $152,856 90,949,320
LAND O'LAKES INC International Y Agriculture NATIONWIDE $129,072 76,797,625
TEXAS AGRICULTURAL EXPERIMENT
International N Agriculture Huye, Nyamagabe, Musanze, Burera, Nyabihu, Rusizi
$998,669 594,207,780
CARANA CORP International N Agriculture Kirehe, Gatsibo, Nyanza, Bugesera
$846,740 503,810,333
HEIFER INTERNATIONAL (RWA)
International Y Agriculture: Dairy production, market access, and knowledge
Nyagatare 24,072,100 24,072,100
Rwanda Civil Society Mapping – Final Report
70
Name International or
Local
Registered (Y/N)
Activities Districts
Budget as Reported RWF unless stated
otherwise Budget RWf
application
LAND O’LAKES INTERNATIONAL DEV’T
International Dairy production Nyagatare $5,000,000 2,975,000,000
OXFAM GREAT BRITAIN
(ADD)
International Strengthening unity and reconciliation and women Economic Empowerment Programs
Nyagatare and Muhanga, Kirehe, Rulindo, Gakenke,
Nyarugenge, Gasabo
£800,000 768,800,000
CONCERN WORLDWIDE USA (Add)
International Agriculture (food production and income generating activities)
Huye, Gakenke, Gisagara and Nyaruguru
187,977,629 187,977,629
Send a cow Rwanda International Livestock& Agric Gasabo 14,476,462 14,476,462
World Vision International
International Y Agriculture and livestock interventions
Nyamagabe, Nyaruguru, Huye, Gicumbi, Gakenke, Bugesera, Gatsibo, Kayonza, Gatsibo, Karongi, Gasabo,
$4,625,000 2,775,000,000
Total International RFW
33,052,121,103
Rwanda Green Foundation
Local Y Agri-Processing Industry ( construction of small scale industry for maize and soya processing
Bugesera 90,000,000 90,000,000
Fondation Artisans de la Paix et du Developpement aux Rwanda asbl
Local Y Agriculture-Training and Plantation Gakenye, Rulindo 4,800,000 4,800,000
Rwanda Civil Society Mapping – Final Report
71
Name International or
Local
Registered (Y/N)
Activities Districts
Budget as Reported RWF unless stated
otherwise Budget RWf
Inades Formation Rwanda
Local Y Agriculture- Bugesera 54,686,886 54,686,886
ASSIST Rwanda Local Y Agriculture (provision of inputs, seeds fertilisers pesticides, training
Nyagatare 40,780,009 40,780,009
ASSIST Rwanda Local Y Agriculture (promotion of Agricultural act ivies like animal rearing and Nutrition through Crop farming
Eastern, Southern and Northern Provinces
122,702,472 122,702,472
Rwanda School Garden Initiative
Local Y implementation of vegetable Garden and fruit trees, extension
Karongo, Kicukiro, Rulindo, Nyamashekye and Rusizi
37,556,560 37,556,560
ASPIRE Local Y Agriculture(train women in basic farming, support beneficiaries start small animal rearing projects
Gasabo 15,700,000 15,700,000
Rwanda Development Solutions (RDS)
Local Y Agriculture (supply of improved seeds, one cow per family, fertilizers, training
Gatsibo, Kayonza, Nyagatare and Bugesera
23,970,000 23,970,000
Association pour le Developpement Integre et Protection de L Environment (A.I.D.E.P)
Local Y Agriculture (provide high quality seeds for fruit and tree farming information on pre treatment for seed and nursery establishment, construct surface run offs harvesting ponds, empower farmers with appropriate knowledge
Rubavu and Rutsiro $419,400 249,543,000
Rwanda Organic Agriculture Movement(ROAM)
Local Y Agriculture(training on better farming methods, training Agricultural officers, participating
Ngoma, Musanze 80,000,000 80,000,000
Rwanda Civil Society Mapping – Final Report
72
Name International or
Local
Registered (Y/N)
Activities Districts
Budget as Reported RWF unless stated
otherwise Budget RWf
in trade fair in Germany, securing the organic certificate, policies
Power of Love - Urukundo association
Local Y Agriculture Kicukiro 160,000,000 160,000,000
Institution d'Appui aux Agri-Eleveurs de Busasamana (I.A.BU asbl)
Local Y Agriculture Rubavu, Nyabihu 80,970,780 80,970,780
Association d'Appui aux Cooperatives et Association (UGAMA/CSC)
Local Y Agricultural and Food security Muhanga, Ruhango, Kamonyi
205,000,000 205,000,000
Caritas-RWANDA Local Y Agricultural Support and Credit Huye, Ngoma, Rubavu, Kigali Ville, Musanze, Karongi, Rutsiro, Gicumbi, Rusizi, Huye, Muhanga, Ruhango, Nyamagabe
1,203,995,818 1,203,995,818
Action Pour le Developpement Rural Integre(DUHAMIC-ADRI)
Local Y Agriculture and food Security Rulindo, Gakenye, Muhanga, Kamonyi
187,537,417 187,537,417
Rwanda Network of People Living with HIV/AIDS (RRP+)
Local Y Sustainable Agriculture education (Nutrition, home garden education and credits
All $ 92,104.00 54,801,880
Institution d'appui aux Agri-eleveurs de Busasamana
Local Y Appuie aux coopératives - Inventior tous les associations cooperatives
Rubavu 940,000 940,000
Rwanda Civil Society Mapping – Final Report
73
Name International or
Local
Registered (Y/N)
Activities Districts
Budget as Reported RWF unless stated
otherwise Budget RWf
Inades Formation Rwanda
Local Y Institutional activities ( operations) all districts in which IFR is supporting farmers organisations
73,286,844 73,286,844
Rwanda Organic Agriculture Movement(ROAM)
Local Y capacity building for cooperatives in report preparation, Admin & Operation
Ngoma, Musanze 103,000,000 103,000,000
Action Pour le Developpement Rural Integre(DUHAMIC-ADRI)
Local Y Capacity Building (including Cooperatives)
Nyaruguru, Muhanga 113,791,557 113,791,557
RWANDA DEVELOPMENT ORGANISATION (RDO)
Local Y Crop Intensification Program (CIP) -Sensitise and train farmers towards intensive maize production
Nyagatare 73,289,934 73,289,934
RWANDA DEVELOPMENT ORGANISATION (RDO)
Local Y Catalist -Maize Crop Intensification project using ISFM and participatory demonstration plots approach - Facilitate creation of innovation platforms
Nyagatare 20,241,765
20,241,765
RWANDA DEVELOPMENT ORGANISATION (RDO)
Local Y Food security project -Training in animal traction
Nyagatare &Gatsibo Counted under Trocaire
Counted under Trocaire
Total Local RWF 6,045,169,657
Rwanda Civil Society Mapping – Final Report
74
ANNEX 7 EDPRS 6 – INDUSTRY AND COMMERCE
Name International or Local
Registered (Y/N)
Activities Districts Budget as Reported RWF unless
otherwise stated)
Budget RWf
DIAN FOSSEY GORILLA FUND INTERNATIONAL
International Y Gorilla Conservation Musanze $905,000 533,950,000
MOUNTAIN GORILLA VETERINARY PROJECT
International Y Conservation(Eco-tourism industry) of mountain Gorillas
Musanze $261,000 153,990,000
ART OF CONSERVATION,Inc
International Y Conservation Education Musanze, Burera &Nyabihu $150,018 88,510,620
GORILLA ORGANISATION
International Y Conservation and Protection of gorillas
Musanze, Burera,& Nyabihu districts
$477,392 281,661,280
INTERNATIONAL GORILLA CONSERVATION PROGRAMME
International Y Protect Mountain Gorillas, their habitat and manage the shared ecosystem
Musanze, Rubavu, Burera & Nyabihu
1,195,500 1,195,500
WILDLIFE CONSERVATION SOCIETY
International Y Conservation, Tourism Promotion and research
Nyaruguru, Nyamagabe, Nyamasheke, Karongi & Rusizi
$780,569 460,535,710
GREAT APE TRUST OF IOWA/GISHWATI AREA CONSERVATION PROGRAM
International Y conservation of Gishwati Forest Rutsiro $224,000 132,160,000
Tota International RFW
1,652,003,110
Inades Formation Rwanda
Local Y Institutional activities (operations)
All districts in which IFR is supporting farmers organisations
73,286,844 73,286,844
Prison Fellowship Rwanda
Local Y Trade ( income Generating e.g. Goat project)
Kayonza District 880,000 880,000
Caritas-RWANDA Local Y Credit Financing Rusizi, Huye, Kirehe, Ruhango, Karongi, Musanze
19,556,200 19,556,200
Total Local RWF 93,723,044
Rwanda Civil Society Mapping – Final Report
75
ANNEX 8 EDPRS 7 – FUEL AND ENERGY
Name International or Local
Registered (Y/N)
Activities Districts Budget as Reported
Budget RWf
CARE International Rwanda
International Y CASE Huye, Gisagara, Nyamagabe, Nyamagabe
$53,666 31,931,270
Total International
RWF
31,931,270
Safer Rwanda Local Y Solar energy, construction of solar rural workshop, equipment for the solar workshop training of solar engineers.
Bugesera, Kamonyi, Gicumbi
32,500,000 32,500,000
Les Compagnons Fontainiers du Rwanda
Local Y Power Supply (Hydroelectrique) Muhanga 52,326,432 52,326,432
Total Local RWF 84,826,432
ANNEX 9 - EDPRS 8 – TRANSPORT AND COMMUNICATIONS
No International
or Local Name Activities Districts Budget as
Reported Budget RWf
Rwanda Civil Society Mapping – Final Report
76
ANNEX 10 EDPRS 9 – LAND HOUSING AND COMMUNITY AMENITIES
International or Local Name Activities Districts
Budget as Reported Budget RWf
International CARE International Rwanda ECD Kamonyi $92,435 54,998,825
International CARE International Rwanda CWASA Musanze $13,846 8,238,370
International CARE International Rwanda LIBRAP Nyamagabe, Nyaruguru and Rutsiro
$20,000 11,900,000
Total International
RWF
75,137,195
Local International Choir Association and Instrumental Ensemble
Creation of School of Music in Kigali Nyarugenge 121,000,000 121,000,000
Local Association Saint Vincent de Paul Housing( construction of Head quarters)
Nyarugenge 70,000,000 70,000,000
Local Prison Fellowship Rwanda
Housing (Construction) Kayonza, Musanze, Kamonyi, Bugesera
277,500,000 277,500,000
Local Young Women's Christian Association of Rwanda
Housing ( construction of houses for 14 orphans
Muhanga, Ruhango, Kamonyi, Rwamagana, Nyabihu, Kayonza and Huye
25,920,000 25,920,000
Local ASSIST Rwanda Housing (construction and equipment of Nyagatare Children and Youth Development Centre.
Nyagatare 202,200,000 202,200,000
Local Bethesda Healing Ministries Shelter Program (construction of a church and Salle Polyvalente)
Nyagatare 308,812,200 308,812,200
Local Power of Love/ Urukundo association
Construction of a School Kicukiro 16,000,000.00 16,000,000
Local Les Compagnons Fontainiers du Rwanda
Capacity Building and Community Support (rehabilitation and construction of schools and health
Ngororero, Nyabihu, Muhanga, Bugesera
251,381,222 251,381,222
Rwanda Civil Society Mapping – Final Report
77
International or Local Name Activities Districts
Budget as Reported Budget RWf
centers)
Local Solace Ministries Land Housing central office construction
Kigali Ville, Nyanza 59,000,000 59,000,000
Total Local RWF 1,331,813,422
Rwanda Civil Society Mapping – Final Report
78
ANNEX 11 - EDPRS 10 – WATER AND SANITATION
International or Local
Name Activities Districts Budget as Reported Budget RWf
International WATER AID Capacity development, sector monitoring, improving accessibility
Bugesera, Kigali 38,062,500 38,062,500
International MOUVEMENT POUR LA LUTTE CONTRE LA FAIM DANS LE MONDE (MLFM)
Water and infrastructure Gicumbi, Gatsibo and Ngoma 969,796,462 969,796,462
International LIVING WATER INTERNATIONAL
Supply of clean water to the community
Karongi $60,000 35,700,000
International PROTOS asbl Clean water & irrigation in Muhanga in partnership with COFORWA, DUHAMIC-ADRI, UGAMA-CSC
Muhanga €178,874 146,497,806
International WATER FOR PEOPLE RWANDA
Water, sanitation and hygiene education
Rulindo, Kicukiro, $153,338 91,236,110
International PAIRB Water, Sanitation and Hygiene Bugesera 130,000,000 130,000,000
International CARE International Rwanda CWASA Musane $160,196 95,316,620
International World Vision Water Supply and Sanitation and Hygiene
Gatsibo, Nyamagabe, Rutsiro, Karongi,
875.000.000 875,000,000
Total International RFW
2,381,609,498
Local Rwanda Green Foundation Water management (control of water hyacinth in Akagera river system)
Akagera National Park, Mihindi and Ihema Lakes
38,000,000 38,000,000
Local Association Rwandaise pour l'Amenagement et la Sauvegarde des Infrastructures
construction of water tanks at Birira, Buramira, Kimonyi, Jenda and Bugeshi
Musanze 107,645,431 107,645,431
Local Les Compagnons Fontainiers du Rwanda
Water and Sanitation Ngororero 52,067,200 52,067,200
Rwanda Civil Society Mapping – Final Report
79
Total Local RFW 197,712,631
Rwanda Civil Society Mapping – Final Report
80
ANNEX 12 - EDPRS 11 – YOUTH CULTURE AND SPORTS
International or Local Name Activities Districts Budget as Reported Budget RWf
International MIRACLE CORNERS OF RWANDA(MCR)
Community center for youth empowerment, enterprenership, ICT, Tailoring and English training
Bugesera $ 40,600 24,157,000
International INTERNATIONAL YOUTH FELLOWSHIP
Youth development through education, international fellowship and social voluntary works
Gasabo district 460,000,000 460,000,000
International EDUCATION DEVELOPMENT CENTER, Inc(EDC)
Youth Livelihood and workforce Development through capacity building.
Kicukiro, Gasabo & Nyarugenge
$ 2,079,873 1,237,524,435
International DIGITAL OPPORTUNITY TRUST/DOT Rwanda
Training in ICT ,business and livelihood skills to youth
Kicukiro, Gasabo & Nyarugenge
$ 239,865.00 142,719,675
International RIGHT TO PLAY Education, Health & HIV Prevention (training, regular participation of children, educating them on HIV/AIDS prevention strategies)
Kigali City & Rubavu 317,767,248 317,767,248
International JOINT AID MANAGEMENT (J.A.M) INTERNATIONAL
Welfare (providing the basic needs), education (pay school fees; provide scholastic materials, health, agriculture).
Muhanga 149,947,536 149,947,536
Intenational World Vision Interantional Youth Leaderhip Development, Rwanda Youth Week
Bugesera 31,600,000 31,600,000
Total International RFW 2,363,715,894
Local Jya mu bandi mwana Culture - Music promotion Nyarugenge 17 850 000 17,850,000
Local Association des Etudiants et Eleves Rescapes du Génocide(AERG)
Culture & sports (Sports for togetherness, Genocide Memorial preparations.
All in Rwanda 59,803,000 59,803,000
Local Association Saint Vincent de Paul Culture and Youth All in Rwanda 4,450,000 4,450,000
Local Life World Mission Frontier Culture (spiritual evangelism hope through the word of God
All in Rwanda 11,300,000 11,300,000
Rwanda Civil Society Mapping – Final Report
81
International or Local Name Activities Districts Budget as Reported Budget RWf
Local ASSIST Rwanda Youth employment in cleaning services, funds for car wash and recycling projects, permits and equipments.
Northern provinces, city of Kigali
45,000,000 45,000,000
Local Youth Generation with a Vision cultural development Musanze, Kigali, Burera 55,328,780 55,328,780
Local Reseau Des Femmes Oeuvrant Pour Le Developpemnt Rural
Culture National level 252,600,000 252,600,000
Local Inter-church Youth Foundation Culture and Sports (Training on Traditional DANCE,
Gasabo and Kicukiro District 16,401,500 16,401,500
Local Parlement des Jeunes Rwandais(PAJER)
Village saving and loan association for the youth, capacity building for Isangano youth centre, youth employment
Gatsibo 140,000,000 140,000,000
Local Education welfare Support TB patients, training on PBF Eastern province, Kigali, Rwamagana, Gasabo
30,000,000 30,000,000
Local BUSINESS MEN'S FELLOWSHIP Evangelisation Kicukiro, Gasabo, Musanze 6,000,000 6,000,000
Local Association Ejo Nzamera Nte Youth Support Ngoma, Kirehe and Gatsibo 1,500,000 1,500,000
Local Transformational Leadership Center (TLC)
Capacity Building (Youth and Leadership) All in Rwanda € 100,000 81,900,000
Local Transformational Leadership Center (TLC)
CSO: Church Mobilisation, training leaders in Churches
Rwamagana, Nyagatare, Nyabihu, Rubavu, Nyamagabe, Musanze
$ 29,000 16,704,000
Local International Choir Association and Instrumental Ensemble
Administration ( visitation and Performances
Kigali 6,100,000 6,100,000
Local VISION FOR AFRICA.ORG Good governance( sports for Peace to selected schools
6 sectors of Kicukiro district 6,000,000 6,000,000
Local Youth League for peace and conflict resolution in Great Lakes region: LPGL
Youth Gasabo 116,462,000 116,462,000
Local Imbuto foundation support to youth activities/forum Kigali 51,532,500 51,532,500
Total Local RWF 918,931,780
Rwanda Civil Society Mapping – Final Report
82
ANNEX 13 - EDPRS 12 – HEALTH
International or Local Name Activities Districts
Budget as Reported Budget RWf
International POPULATION SERVICE INTERNATIONAL/PSI
Training Anti-Aids club members, distribution of condoms, community mobilization events
All districts 1,992,723,157 1,992,723,157
International CLINTON FOUNDATION Strengthening capacity of Rwandan Health system and Economic development and Poverty reduction programs.
All districts $ 3,090,000 1,838,550,000
International JSI RESEARCH & TRAINING INSTITUTE, INC. (JSI R&T)
Improve injection safety practices, commodity supply management, health care waste management, and health care worker safety.
Western Province 403,619,811 403,619,811
International JOHN SNOW, INC Improving & strengthening the Logistics System, capacity building & country program operations
All districts $ 17,830,268 10,609,009,460
International FAMILY HEALTH INTERNATIONAL HIV/AIDS clinical care and treatment, health systems strengthening, family planning and reproductive health, HIV/STI primary prevention.
National level & Kigali city, Gakenke and Southern Province excluding Huye & Gisagara
$12,355,165 7,351,323,175
International FONDATION DON CARLO GNOCCHI Health Bugesera £ 147,400 141,798,800
International RWANDA COMMUNITY WORKS Construction of health centres Bugesera 375,171,592 375,171,592
International EI (Earth Institute) RWANDA LLC Technical support, tropical diseases control, training of health facilities staffs, provision of drugs
Bugesera, Rwamagana, Musanze, Gakenke, Nyabihu, Ngoma
347,948,414 347,948,414
International JHPIEGO Maternal & newborn care, Central & district level (Gakenke, $2,072,551 1,233,167,845
Rwanda Civil Society Mapping – Final Report
83
International or Local Name Activities Districts
Budget as Reported Budget RWf
training of community health workers, clinical training skills, male circumcision
Rubavu, Ruhango, Nyamagabe & Kigali city districts
International DREW CARES INTERNATIONAL Provide Quality HIV/AIDS Prevention care and treatment services for military personnel, their families, as well as the community members who live in areas close to military health care.
All districts $1,844,175 1,097,284,125
International INSTITUTE FOR REPRODUCTIVE HEALTH (GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY)
Health; Reproductive Health and Family Planning through the FAM Project. Awareness-based Methods and increase the youth fertility awareness
All districts $293,546.00 174,659,870
International HEALTH STORE FOUNDATION Health(Operate medical clinics ) Gasabo and Kicukiro districts € 381,400.00 312,366,600
International MILDMAY INTERNATIONAL HIV Palliative care Gasabo, Gicumbi, Rulindo, Nyagatare
$146,409 87,113,355
International RESEARCH TRIANGLE INSTITUTE (RTI) Prevention of Malaria using Indoor residual spraying (IRS) operation
Gasabo, Nyarugenge ,Kicukiro, Kirehe, Nyanza, Bugesera, Nyagatare
$ 5,801,867 3,452,110,865
International ELIZABETH GLASER PAEDIATRIC AIDS FOUNDATION (EGPAF)
Health(Operate HIV/AIDs clinical services Program)
Gatsibo, Kayonza, Rwamagana, Ngoma, Bugesera, Kicukiro, Nyarugenge
$ 6,865,790 4,085,145,050
International INTRAHEALTH INTERNATIONAL Health and education (adolescent reproductive health services, lessons about the effectiveness of model ARH initiative)
Gicumbi & Nyarugenge districts $111,032 66,064,040
International VISION FOR A NATION Health: eye care, eye glasses coverage and vision correction
Gicumbi district $35,576 21,167,720
Rwanda Civil Society Mapping – Final Report
84
International or Local Name Activities Districts
Budget as Reported Budget RWf
International CHRISTAIN AID HIV/AIDS and Malaria secure livelihoods, accountable Governance
Gicumbi, Bugesera, Kayonza , Kirehe, Nyamagabe
€328,847 269,325,693
International NORWEGIAN CHURCH AID Health(HIV/IDS), Security, Education and reconciliation
Gicumbi, Kayonza Bugesera, Musanze
517,800,000 517,800,000
International HEALTH UNLIMITED Health(working with youth to access sexual and reproductive health right)
Gisagara, Nyaruguru €138,946.00 113,796,774
International ORAL HEALTH FOUNDATION Constructing a dental clinic Kamonyi € 42,487.00 34,796,853
International MEDICUSMUNDI public health (réhabilitation of clear water sources, agriculture (promotion de la qualification technique des produits artisanau)
Kamonyi € 1,180,184 966,570,696
International CHF INTERNATIONAL Health & Social services, building household resilience (economic strengthening - create youth business groups, food security, education)
Kamonyi, Karongi, Ngororero, Bugesera, Gakenke, Gatsibo, Muhanga, Nyagatare, Nyamagabe, Nyaruguru, Rubavu, Ruhango, Rulindo, Rutsiro, Rwamagana & Kigali city districts
$7,488,210 4,455,484,950
International SURVIVORS FUND Health, education and capacity of building to Genocide survivors
Kamonyi, Rwamagana ,Bugesera, Kayonza, Huye, Nyanza, Ruhango, Rusizi, Kicukiro ,Gasabo, Ngororero
11,670,000 11,670,000
International PARTNERS IN HEALTH Health system strengthening and support procurement of low cost essential medicines
Kayonza (Rwinkwavu hospital) ,Kirehe hospital, Ngoma, Burera(Butaro hospital)
$10,935,000.00 6,506,325,000
International TEARFUND HIV/AIDS Livelihoods, food security, water sanitation 7 cooperatives
Kayonza, Rwamagana, Kicukiro, Nyamagabe, Nyamasheke, Karongi, Kamonyi
$229,775.00 132,580,175
International PROGRAM FOR APPROPRIATE Health: prevention of mother to Kicukiro, Nyarugenge, Bugesera, $ 95,644.00 56,908,180
Rwanda Civil Society Mapping – Final Report
85
International or Local Name Activities Districts
Budget as Reported Budget RWf
TECHNOLOGY IN HEALTH (PATH) child transmission of HIV/AIDS Rwamagana, Kayonza, Gatsibo, Ngoma districts
International WOMEN EQUITY IN ACCESS TO CARE AND TREATMENT (WE-ACT))
HIV/AIDS (health care to patients, organize sensitization campaigns for behaviour change against HIV/AIDS, and adults counselling)
Kigali city & Nyamasheke 92,770,000 92,770,000
International WAYMAN WORLDWIDE HEALTH PARTNERS
Health sector; community Health Initiatives and Programs .Help MOH to improve the primary health care delivery system in rural area.
Musanze 244,354,382 244,354,382
International ENGENDER HEALTH Improve Maternal and Child Health care by providing support for fistula care and prevention
Musanze, Kicukiro & Nyarugenge $ 669,993 398,645,835
International INTERNATIONAL CENTER FOR AIDS CARE AND TREATMENT PROGRAM (ICAP), MAILMAN SCHOOL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY
HEALTH(prevention, care, food support and treatment services to HIV/AIDS)
National level $ 1,556,506 926,121,070
International MANAGEMENT SCIENCES FOR HEALTH(MSH)
strengthening Pharmaceutical systems(SPs) Project and the integrated Health strengthening Project(IHSSP)
All Districts $ 7,005,307 4,168,157,665
International HUMANITY FOR CHILDREN Health(health center construction)
Ngoma $ 160,000.00 95,200,000
International AIDS HEALTHCARE FOUNDATION Health on HIV, Care and support in two districts (Gasabo and Nyabihu)
Nyabihu& Gasabo 300,594,988 300,594,988
International PROJET UBUZIMA Health(clinical research on HIV/AIDs)
Nyarugenge $334,171.50 198,832,043
Rwanda Civil Society Mapping – Final Report
86
International or Local Name Activities Districts
Budget as Reported Budget RWf
International FUTURES GROUP INTERNATIONAL Health( fight against HIV/AIDs),M&E .Capacity building and skills transfer to CNLS, TRA C& MOH
Nyarugenge $ 1,800,000.00 1,071,000,000
International PROJECT SAN FRANCISCO Health (heterosexual study, mutual payment, family planning promotion)
Nyarugenge and Kigali City $ 810,453.00 482,219,535
International ACADEMIC MEDICAL CENTER -CENTER FOR POVERTY RELATED COMMUNICABLE DISEASES(AMC CPCD Rwanda)
Health sector; Reseacrch on HIV/AIDS, TB and Malaria
Nyarugenge 1,077,000 1,077,000
International BREAST CANCER INITIATIVE East Africa Health Nyarugenge, Gasabo, Kicukiro $ 429,000.00 255,255,000
International FRED HOLLOWS FOUNDATION Health(eye care-prevention of blindness
Rubavu, Ngororero, Nyabihu, Central level
$182,272.00 108,451,840
International FUTURES GROUP INTERNATIONAL Monitoring & evaluation Technical assistance
CNLS, Nyarugenge $ 1,800,000 1,071,000,000
International World Relief HIV/ AIDS prevention program in youth (10-24) in community and schools. Behavior change communication and OVC support
Kicukiro, Nyarugenge, Gasabo, Bugesera, Ngoma, Rwamagana, Kayonza, Kirehe, Musanze, Burera, Rusizi, and Nyamasheke
248,014,118 248,014,118
International PSI Rwanda Health Bugesera 110,519,370.0 110,519,370
International Children of God Relief Organisation Health Bugesera 5,000,000.0 5,000,000
International Food for Hungry Health Bugesera 37,458,120.0 37,458,120
International WORLD RELIEF INC Reducing mortality rate and morbidity rate for children under 5 years, combating leading diseases in Rwanda: malaria, diarrhea, pneumonia and
Kirehe, Ngoma, Nyagaguru, Nyamasheke, Gisagara, Nyamagare
$283,741 158,327,478
Rwanda Civil Society Mapping – Final Report
87
International or Local Name Activities Districts
Budget as Reported Budget RWf
malnutrition. Focus in community mobilization for prevention and Case management
International Columbia University Health Rubavu, Gasabo, Karongi $160,000.00 95,200,000
International Population Services International Health Nationwide $278,190.00 165,523,050
International Family Health International Health Nyarugenge, Kicukiro $79,695.00 47,418,525
International AVSI Health Kamonyi 91,521,550 91,521,550
International FHI Health Kamonyi $ 859,912 511,647,640
International MEDICUS-MUNDI Health, Gender Promotion and Water
Kamonyi € 1,180,190 966,575,610
International Medical Foundation Health Kamonyi $ 31,128 18,521,160
International Fountain of Hope Foundation:FHF Health/HIV/AIDS, fight against poverty
Gasabo 50,333,333 50,333,333
International PSI Health, Social Protection Kamonyi 30,242,300 30,242,300
International OHF Health Kamonyi € 42,487 34,796,853
International Compassion International Education, Health Kamonyi 186,570,095 186,570,095
International SEVOTA Health Kamonyi 16,800,000 16,800,000
International CARSA Health, Economic Development Kamonyi 62,750,000 62,750,000
International ARCT-RUHUKA PSYCHOSOCIAL Muhanga 8,767,200 8,767,200
International ADRA RWANDA Health, Education ,Food security, Economic development, Disaster Management ( Funding RIREP, IBYIRINGIRO Project,
Nyagatare 128,891,783 128,891,783
International ADRA RWANDA AIDS Relief Nyagatare 7,989,884 7,989,884
International JSI Research & Training Institute Inc./MMIS
Health: Injections safety ,Health care waste Management and Health personnel protection;
Nyagatare 10,154,865 10,154,865
Rwanda Civil Society Mapping – Final Report
88
International or Local Name Activities Districts
Budget as Reported Budget RWf
Install separated waste pits in two health centers; Provide 2 waste bins to each health facility
International MILD MAY INTERNATIONAL HIV Palliative Care Nyagatare $30,679 18,254,005
International PSI-RWANDA ( Population services International )
Health (HIV/AIDS prevention, Family planning , Malaria prevention, safe water system
Nyagatare 75,894,500 75,894,500
International Action for Health& Integrated development
Health Gasabo 89,908,000 89,908,000
International ALARM MINISTRIES Health/HIV/AIDS, Environment/hygiene/sanitation
Gasabo 254,200,000 254,200,000
International ASSOCIATION BAMPOREZE Health Gasabo 163,872 163,872
International BETHESDA HEALING MINISTRIES: BHM Health Gasabo 360,612,200 360,612,200
International POPULATION SERVICES INTERNATIONAL Health NATIONWIDE $ 605,390 360,206,865
International INTERNATIONAL RESCUE COMMITTEE (IRC)
Health Kirehe, Ngoma, Nyagaguru, Nyamasheke, Gisagara, Nyamagare $ 145,600 86,632,000
International ELIZABETH GLASER PAEDIATRIC AIDS FOUNDATION
Health Gatsibo, Kayonza, Nyarugenge, Rwamagana, Bugesera, Kicukiro $43,324 25,777,780
International FAMILY HEALTH INTERNATIONAL - ROADS II
Health Kicukiro, Nyarugenge, Gasabo, Rusizi, Burera, Rubavu $226,400 134,708,000
International FAMILY HEALTH INTERNATIONAL - Clinical
Health Kicukiro, Nyarugenge, Nyaruguru, Kamonyi, Kicukiro, Muhanga, Ruhangu, Nyamagabe $ 71,667 42,642,120
International ARBEF support to ASRH clinical services Karongi and Rusizi districts 36,888,054 36,888,054
International PSI Santé Ruhango 63,223,489 63,223,489
International Fhi Santé Ruhango 7,330,000 7,330,000
International CSDI Santé /SIDA Ruhango 1,034,619 1,034,619
Rwanda Civil Society Mapping – Final Report
89
International or Local Name Activities Districts
Budget as Reported Budget RWf
International TROCARE Health Kamonyi € 66,820.00 54,725,580
International CHF INTERNATIONAL (Moved) Health Bugasera, Karongi, Nyamasheke, Rutsiro, Ngororero, Nyabihu, Rubavu, Kicukiro, Nyarugenge, Nyaruguru, Nyamagabe, Ruhango, Muhanga, Kamonyi, Gasabo, Rwamagana, Gatsibo, Nyagatare, Gicumbi, Rulindo 5,021,046 2,987,522,489
International CONCERN WORLDWIDE USA (Add) Health (child survival nutrition and HIV/AIDS)
Gisagara and Nyaruguru 174,981,442 174,981,442
International Research Triangle Institute International (Moved)
Health Gasabo 361,831,901 361,831,901
International HANDICAP INTERNATIONAL Health (Mental Health, VIH/SIDA, Epilepsy, Community Based Rehabilitation)
Ngoma, Nyarugenge, Nyanza, Rusizi, Musanze, Huye, Kayonza, Gasabo, Ruhango, Muhanga, Gicumbi, Karongi, Kamonyi, Rulindo, Kicukiro, Gatsibo, Bugesera, Gisagara, Nyagatare, Nyaruguru, Rwamagana
€1,287,821 1,030,256,800
International TULANE INTERNATIONAL LLC (Add) Support to Rwanda’s higher education sector in the health sciences via collaborative strengthening of faculties in pedagogy, integration of IT, applied research, and administrative and managerial systems. Additional support to Rwanda’s National Malaria Control Program
National level $ 2,155,000 1,282,225,000
International SAVE THE CHILDREN Health Burera, Gicumbi US$400,000 238,000,000
Rwanda Civil Society Mapping – Final Report
90
International or Local Name Activities Districts
Budget as Reported Budget RWf
International CARE International Rwanda CAVA Gatsibo $96,230 57,256,850
International CARE International Rwanda RI Gatsibo $25,795 15,348,025
International CARE International Rwanda ECD Kamonyi $75,884 45,150,980
International CARE International Rwanda HU Ruhango, Nyanza, Gisagara, Huye, Nyamagabe, Nyaruguru
$51,011 30,351,545
International CARE International Rwanda GLAI Ruhango, Nyanza, Gisagara, Huye, Nyamagabe, Nyaruguru
$56,029 33,337,255
International
World Vision International Maternal and Child Health, Nutrition, HIV/AIDS, Malaria, TB,
Nyamagabe, Nyaruguru, Gicumbi, $ 5,780,000 3,510,000,000
Total International RFW
70,439,647,863
Local Africa Transformation Network Health (Partnership with KHI to provide Physicians and lecturers
Kicukiro 25,000,000 25,000,000
Local Community Socio-Economic Development Initiative
Health (reduced incidence, and impact of communicable diseases and malnutrition among target communities)
Ruhango District 13,151,000 13,131,000
Local MTN Foundation Health National 33,000,000 33,000,000
Local Prison Fellowship Rwanda Health ( trauma Counselling & Education)
Rilima, Musanze, Ntsinda and Miyove Prisons
17,000,000 17,000,000
Local Friends of Handicap in Rwanda Health (Payment for Medicine, HIV/AIDS awareness)
Nyagatare, Gatunda Sector 5,550,000 5,550,000
Local Kunda Umwana Health and Nutrition( recruitment & training of nurses, parents on malnutrition, construction of a dispensary, salary
All VUP Sectors 530,400,000 530,400,000
Rwanda Civil Society Mapping – Final Report
91
International or Local Name Activities Districts
Budget as Reported Budget RWf
Local Association Ihorere Munyarwanda Health ( HIV awareness testing of sex workers and their children, training on HIV/AIDS, Counselling, Access to condoms,
Muhanga, Ruhango, Huye, Musanze ,Rubavu and Gasabo, Ngoma
75,304,817 75,304,817
Local Nsanga Health (sensitization on Hygiene, Sanitation and Nutrition)
Huye 8,300,000 8,300,000
Local Christian People for Humanitarian Action (CPHA)
Health (Prevention, care and Treatment)
Kicukiro and Musanze Districts 26,600,000 26,600,000
Local Rwanda Link Health (Establishing Trauma centres-construction)
Gahanga, Kicukiro 100,000,000 100,000,000
Local Benishyaka Health (Education on reproductive Health)
Nyagatare and Kigali City 24,360,000 24,360,000
Local Action Technique pour un Dévéloppement communautaire(ATEDEC)
Health ( Sensitisation for HIV /AIDS control)
Nyamasheke 8 sectors. 11,042,904 11,142,904
Local Young Women's Christian Association of Rwanda
Health(training on good hygiene, sensitization and training on HIV, AIDS prevention, supporting associations with HIV related Activities)
Muhanga, Ruhango, Kamonyi, Rwamagana, Nyabihu an Kayonza
23,361,000 23,361,000
Local Kigali Freedom School Health (seminars on HIV Prevention, visiting HIV+ patients in hospitals)
Kicukiro, Gikondo 5,000,000 5,000,000
Local BENIMPUHWE Health (prevention of HIV Spread, sensitization on reproductive Health
Gisagara 13,153,396 13,153,396
Local Youth Generation with a Vision
Health( training on SINIGURISHA Program
Burera 6,315,750 6,315,750
Local Better Life (BLAO) Achievement Training against HIV and Children Gasabo district 2,100,000 21,000,000
Rwanda Civil Society Mapping – Final Report
92
International or Local Name Activities Districts
Budget as Reported Budget RWf
Organisation rights on Violence
Local Reseau Des Femmes Oeuvrant Pour Le Developpemnt Rural
Health one sector in each district 91,060,000 91,060,000
Local Association Genrale des Handcapes du Rwanda
Health(HIV awareness in people with disabilities, training for local disability leaders and young teen for behaviour change
All districts 23,440,000 23,440,000
Local Love and Hope-Bugingo Health(HIV Prevention and Campaign, prevention of disease caused by dirt
Kayonza, Gatsibo 2,200,000 2,200,000
Local Inter-church Youth Foundation
Health (capacity building- training of community Organisation and local leaders,
Kayonza 40,000,000 40,000,000
Local Kigali Hope Association
Capacity Building on HIV/AIDS prevention and awareness
Nyarugenge 235,952,400 235,952,400
Local Handicapé Rwandais Rehabilité Réintegré dans ses Droits (HRD)
Health( Testing of children with hearing deficiency, training of personnel to use the machine
Muhanga 23,000,000 23,000,000
Local Association Pour (APTM) la Promotion des Travaux ménager
Health (training peer Educators, Voluntary testing,
Musanze 4,000,000 4,000,000
Local Bethesda Healing Ministries Health (reinforcing HIV preventive measures within the youth and vulnerable children, capacity building in HIV prevention measures within youth, mobilising parents and children about reproductive health
Kayonza 51,800,000 51,800,000
Local National Organisation of User and Health (training and counselling) Kicukiro and Kayonza and 5,674,800 5,674,800
Rwanda Civil Society Mapping – Final Report
93
International or Local Name Activities Districts
Budget as Reported Budget RWf
Survivals of Psychiatry Nyagatare districts
Local TABARA Health (Universal Access to integrated HIV/AIDS services
Burera 13,814,550 13,814,550
Local ISHYANGA RYERA Health (providing mutuell to 500 people,
MVK 700,000 700,000
Local Action for Integration Health Development (AHID)
Health (train Health Information Teams on HIV, Community Mobilization on HIV/,AIDS clubs in schools, Family Planning)
Gasabo 2,400,000 2,400,000
Local Association National de Soutien aux Personnes vivant avec le VIH/SIDA (ANSP+)
Health (Sensitisation On HIV Prevention, Family Planning
Nyanza 3,610,000 3,610,000
Local ASPIRE Health( Trauma counselling,, sexual and reproductive health, empowering them to have access to mutuelle de santé
Gasabo 24,400,000 24,400,000
Local Voice of Community Organisation Health (Train Adolecents on reproductive Health, train community on water treatment
Kicukiro 523,500 523,500
Local Hope Foundation Health( school hygiene for girls, equipping girls hygiene rooms, train good mothers and teachers in counselling
Ruhango 15,000,000 15,000,000
Local Cooperate Out of Poverty (Coop-Rwanda)
Health ( support associations of HIV+ People, BCC Campaign in community, door to door campaigns on HIV and Family Planning
Southern and Northern Province in Nyaruguru/ Gakenke District
115,200,000 115,200,000
Local GREAT LAKES CENTER FOR CULTURE, Sante (HIV/AIDS Awareness) Nyaruguru $ 24,500.00 14,577,500
Rwanda Civil Society Mapping – Final Report
94
International or Local Name Activities Districts
Budget as Reported Budget RWf
PEACE AND DEVELOPMENT (GLCPD)
Local BUSINESS MEN'S FELLOWSHIP HIV/AIDS Kicukiro 4,600,000 4,600,000
Local Integrated Family Care Organisation (IFCO)
Health (HIV/AIDS prevention, modern contraceptives, OVC)
All 106,200,000 106,200,000
Local LIGHT ASSOCIATION Health and sanitation awareness Kicukiro 1,140,000 1,140,000
Local ASSOCIATION RWANDAISE DE PROMOTION D'INTERET COMMUN (ARPIC)
Sante (HIV/AIDS Awareness, Condom distribution)
Nyarugenge 950,000 950,000
Local KEMIT asbl Health: awareness thru TV and Films
All 40,666,644 40,666,644
Local Power of Love/ Urukundo association
Health: HIV/AIDS Control Nyamasheke, Rusizi 86,000,000 86,000,000
Local JYA MU BANDI MWANA Sante Gasabo 3,000,000 3,000,000
Local Institution d'Appui aux Agri-Eleveurs de Busasamana (I.A.BU asbl)
Sante: HIV/AIDS Control Rubavu, Nyabihu 8,520,000 8,520,000
Local ESPOIR DE L'ENFANT asbl Sante Kigali Ville 290,114 290,114
Local Association Ejo Nzamera Nte Sante: HIV/AIDS Control All Eastern Province Districts $35,000.00 20,825,000
Local Association Rwandaise de Lutte Contre la Pauvrete (ALUPA)
Health (HIV/AIDS, Hygiene and Nutrition)
Ngororero 10,151,000 10,151,000
Local Caritas-RWANDA Health Support Kigali Ville, Rusizi, Huye, Musanze, Rubavu, Ruhango, Ngoma, Nyamasheke, Nyamagabe, Nyabihu
318,182,972 318,182,972
Local Association des Veuves du Genocide Agahozo (AVEGA)
Sante (Psycho-Medical) All 46,225,000 46,225,000
Local Association pour le Bien etre Social (A.B.E.S)
Sante Musanze 11,256,860 11,256,860
Local Association pour le Development Agro-Pastoral (ADAP)
Sante: HIV/AIDS Control, Mutuelle de sante
Musanze 13,040,352 13,040,352
Rwanda Civil Society Mapping – Final Report
95
International or Local Name Activities Districts
Budget as Reported Budget RWf
Local African Evangelistic Enterprise (AEE-Rwanda)
Sante: HIV/AIDS programs, training, Health Insurance
Bugesera, Muhanga, Huye, Rubavu, Gicumbi, Kigali Ville
257,260,339 256,460,339
Local AHLUL BAIT ISLAMIC FOUNDATION Sante (HIV/AIDS) Gasabo 6,000,000 6,000,000
Local Urunana/Triat d'Union Health Nyarugenge, Gasabo, Muhanga, Kamonyi, Kicukiro, Rwamagana, Kayonza, Bugesera, Gisagara, Gatsibo, Ngoma, Huye
478,912,324 478,912,324
Local Concern and Care for the Needy in Rwanda
Sante: HIV/AIDS sensitisation Rubavu, Rutsiro, Karongi, Nyamasheke, Rusizi, Muhanga, Kamonyi
45,500,000 45,500,000
Local Make a Difference Initiative Sante: HIV/AIDS Advocacy, sexual education, anti Aids clubs, Counselling
All (in 15 schools), Kigali Ville, Ruhango, Nyanza, Rwamagana, Nyabihu
128,200,000 128,200,000
Local Umbrella des Personnes en situation de Handicap luttant contre le VIP et le SIDA (UPAHLS)
Health: HIV/AIDS (data collection, sensitisation, workshop, etc)
All 68,520,620 68,520,620
Local Rwanda Network of People Living with HIV/AIDS (RRP+)
Health: HIV/AIDS Treatment, coordination
All $ 203,231.00 120,922,445
Local BAMPOREZE Sante: build capacity of HIV care givers and technical support
Nyabihu, Rubavu, Kicukiro, Nyarugenge, Ngororero
$ 129,587.00 77,104,265
Local Solace Ministries Health: ARV Clinic construction Gasabo 62,000,000 62,000,000
Local National Organisation of User and Survivals of Psychiatry
Administration & Operation ( office equipment, recruitment and Training
Kanombe and Karangazi sectors 19,789,200 19,789,200
Local Center for addiction &Psychosocial orientation: CAPO
Sensitization Gasabo 17,018,200 17,018,200
Local Catholic Relief Services Rwanda HIV/AIDS, NUTRITION Gasabo $ 83,476 49,668,220
Local CHABHA (Children affected by HIV/AIDS) Health Gasabo 21,366,000 21,366,000
Rwanda Civil Society Mapping – Final Report
96
International or Local Name Activities Districts
Budget as Reported Budget RWf
Local COMMUNITY SOCIO-ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT:CSDI
health, Education Gasabo 132,937,170 132,937,170
Local Inter-Church youth foundation Health Gasabo 38,444,700 38,444,700
Local JSI Research &training Institute Inc/MMIS
Health Gasabo 3,931,000 3,931,000
Local Umbrella des Personnes en situation handicap luttant contre le VIH/SIDA
Health Gasabo 67,936,466 67,936,466
Local ARBEF Prevention VIH/SiDA Kayonza 8,400,000 8,400,000
Local
ARDR Prevention du VIH/SIDA Renforcement de capacité des Cooperatives
Kayonza
17,324,000 17,324,000
Local SWAA-RWANDA "IHIMURE" HIV/AIDS Program, Kayonza 23,008,020 23,008,020
Local Partners in Health Health and support on social and Economic rights (POOSER)
Kayonza 993,785,256 993,785,256
Local UYISENGA N'MANZI Education Sante DVPt -psychosocial infants and orphans
Kayonza 5,547,681 5,547,681
Local ADRA Rwanda Prevention VIH/SiDA, Prise en charge nutritionnelle et réduction de la pauvrete des PVVIH/SIDA /special Needs Education Inclusive Education.
Kayonza
17,065,750 17,065,750
Local RWANDA NGO FORUM ON HIV/AIDS HIV prevention activities national level 1,804,000 1,804,000
Local RWANDA DEVELOPMENT ORGANISATION (RDO)
Malaria prevention and control -
Sensitize community
mobilisers(community health
workers and local authorities) on
malaria prevention and control
Mobilise opinion leaders on
7 districts of Eastern province 400,000,000 400,000,000
Rwanda Civil Society Mapping – Final Report
97
International or Local Name Activities Districts
Budget as Reported Budget RWf
malaria prevention and control
Total Local RWF 5,338,665,215
Rwanda Civil Society Mapping – Final Report
98
ANNEX 14 - EDPRS 13 – EDUCATION
International or Local Name Activities Districts
Budget as Reported Budget RWf
International ORPHANS OF RWANDA University Education All Districts $ 614,687 365,738,765
International RWANDA GIRLS INITIATIVE Education Bugesera $1,437,712 855,438,640
International FONDATION BLEU CIEL Primary & Secondary school Burera, Gakenke, Musanze 118,143,752 118,143,712
International AMICI DEI POPOLI ONG Youth school fees Gatenga youth center, work centre
Kigali City € 46,700 38,247,300
Interenational World Vision International Rwanda
School construction, capacity building, school fees, and school materials
All Districts $ 5,950,000 3,570,000,000
International VSO(Voluntary Service Overseas)
Teacher Training, disability Program and HIV/AIDs Prevention in schools
All Districts € 489,415 470,817,230
International GREEN HELMETS NGO Vocational Training (construction & solar technology), Training of trainers-teachers, English courses for villagers
Bugesera € 125,000 120,250,000
International UNIVERSAL ISLAMIC & CULTURAL TRUST (UICT)
Unity Holistic education Center(a secondary school and social empowerment)
Gasabo $130,100 77,409,500
International CHABHA (Children Affected by HIV/AIDs)
Pay mutuelle de Sante and school fees to children affected by HIV/AIDS
Gasabo & Kicukiro 45,565,710 45,565,710
International STORIES FOR HOPE RWANDA Training in narrative psychology, booklets for secondary students
Gasabo & Gicumbi $44,925 26,730,375
International BRIDGE2RWANDA Education & entrepreneurship Gasabo & Musanze $ 75,200 44,744,000
International WELLSPRING FOUNDATION FOR EDUCATION
Operate a secondary school in Gasabo district and training program in Kigali city
Gasabo ,Kicukiro & Nyarugenge $996,257 592,772,915
International GOOD NEIGHBOURS Education & Community development. Gasabo and Kamonyi $73,638.00 43,814,610
International INTERNATIONAL EDUCATION EXCHANGE
School based teacher training Gasabo and Nyabihu $ 192,172 114,342,340
International AFRICAN ANCHOR OF HOPE.INC.
Payment of school fees children, professional counselling to parents and children
Gasabo 16.665.000 16,665,000
International ISOKO INSTITUTE Education investment & Gasabo $ 22,680 13,494,600
Rwanda Civil Society Mapping – Final Report
99
International or Local Name Activities Districts
Budget as Reported Budget RWf
entrepreneurship
International ACADEMY FOR EDUCATIONAL DEVELOPMENT (AED)
Interactive educational portal accessing and sharing education materials
All Districts $1,249,000 720,673,000
International DIRECT-AID (AMA) Scholarships, financing cultural activities, training of teachers
Gatsibo, Gasabo, Bugesera 553.340.000 553,340,000
International ESTHER'S AID Education, Dev't, Skills training & Primary school sponsorship
Kicukiro & Gasabo $ 617,610.00 367,477,950
International AL MAKTOUM FOUNDATION Education Kicukiro and Muhanga 266.009.527 266,009,527
International A PARTNER IN EDUCATION Building School Kicukiro 134,654,237 134,654,237
International AFRICAN DEVELOPMENT & EDUCATION FOUNDATION (A.D.E.F)
Kicukiro educational center, Extension of Rwamagana training center, training in religious studies, support female families to form cooperatives)
Kicukiro, Gatsibo, Rwamagana, Nyagatare, Kayonza, Rutsiro, Huye, Kirehe
261,500,000 261,500,000
International ONE LAPTOP PER CHILD (OLPC) Support MOE in the planning of the laptop project
Kigali city & central level $ 446,000 265,370,000
International EDUCAT Education/Training, community development
All Districts $ 361,500 215,092,500
International WORLD LEARNING- SCHOOL FOR INTERNATIONAL TRAINING (SIT) STUDY ABROAD
Education/intercultural relations Kigali city ,Bugesera, Huye $140,000 83,300,000
International WERNER KALKA FOUNDATION Education targeting orphans from cooperatives
Kigali city, Gasabo 14,754,000 14,754,000
International RWANDA AID Education, health care, welfare financing, vocational training, conservation and development
Nyamasheke & Rusizi 279,180,000 279,180,000
International ASSOCIATION MABAWA ASBL Education and infrastructure development
Nyaruguru 159,400,000 159,400,000
International WORLD VISION Rwanda Training teachers, construction of schools, nutrition & food security
Rulindo, Bugesera, Gasabo, Kicukiro, Gicumbi, Nyamagabe, Huye, Nyaruguru, Gatsibo, Rutsiro, Karongi, Gakenke
16,368,927 16,368,927
International CORNERSTONE DEVELOPMENT LTD
Operate Cornerstone Leadership Academy
Rwamagana 129,924,600 129,924,600
Rwanda Civil Society Mapping – Final Report
100
International or Local Name Activities Districts
Budget as Reported Budget RWf
International MAD 4 AFRICA Renovation of classrooms, construction of professional training centers
Nyarugru € 13,485 11,044,215
International Plan Rwanda Education: School feeding Bugesera $ 2,000,000 1,924,000,000
International Millennium village Project Agriculture, Health, and Education Bugesera $9,000,000 8,658,000,000
International Compassion International Education Bugesera 658,000,000 658,000,000
International Africa Transformation Network Education Bugesera 29,430,000 29,430,000
International Mosaic Foundation Education Bugesera $ 630 606,060
International Good Neighbours International Education Kamonyi $31,254 30,066,348
International ADRA Education, Economic Development Kamonyi 33,590,514 33,590,514
International FH/Rwanda Education, Health, agriculture et microprojects
Muhanga 10,317,330 10,317,330
International HI Education, VIH Muhanga 39,253,000 39,253,000
International CLUB SPIC Education Kamonyi 11,525,300 11,525,300
International F.H ASSOCIATION RWA ( Food for Hungry )
Education, Health Nyagatare 22,386,930 22,386,930
International WINROCK INTERNATIONAL Education - Child labor reduction through education in Rwanda
Nyagatare 6,503,600 6,503,600
International CARITAS/HIGA UBEHO Education Nyagatare $154,000 148,148,000
International EPR-HIGA UBEHO Education Nyagatare $169,000 162,578,000
International AFRICA ANCHOR OF HOPE INC: AOH
Education, Health Gasabo 24,472,400 24,472,400
International Africa Muslims Agency:AMA Health, Education, Construction Gasabo 104,000,000 104,000,000
International ESTER'S AID FOR NEEDY & ABANDONED CHILDREN
Education, Health project Gasabo $146,610 141,038,820
International FRATERNITE ST PAUL Education Gasabo 4,770,000 4,770,000
International CENTRE MAREMBO Education Gasabo 46,416,635 46,416,635
International GOOD NEIGHBOURS RWANDA Education, health, microcredit Gasabo $42,384 40,773,408
Rwanda Civil Society Mapping – Final Report
101
International or Local Name Activities Districts
Budget as Reported Budget RWf
International
HEALTH DEVELOPMENT INITIATIVE-RWANDA:HDI
Education, Health insurance Gasabo 18,740,000 18,740,000
International SAVE THE CHILDREN Child Protection and Health Gicumbi ,Rubavu, Ruhango, Burera $484,000 396,396,000
International
DUHAMIC ADRI
Education et volet Economique Ruhango
$94,000 90,428,000
International SNV Education Ruhango € 4,846 3,968,874
International CHF Higa ubeho Education Ruhango $223,606 215,108,972
International HANDICAP INTERNATIONAL
Education(Inclusive Education) Gasabo, Kamonyi, Kayonza, Muhanga, Nyamasheke, Rusizi, Rutsiro, Gicumbi, Gakenke, Ngororero, Nyamagabe, Nyamiyaga, Rubavu, Rulindo,
€427,797 342,237,600
International CONCERN WORLDWIDE USA (Add)
Education Gakenke, Gisagara and Nyaruguru 79,976,280 79,976,280
International CARE International FOFI Musane $92,050 54,769,750
International COSMO Gatsibo, Nyagatare ; Nyamagabe, Nyaruguru; Karongi, Ngororero, Nyabihu, Rutsiro and Rubavu
$13874 8,255,030
Total International
RFW
23,298,020,504
Local SANEJO Education (Training of English Teachers and Rehabilitation of classrooms
Nyamagabe, Ruhango 2,270,000 2,270,000
Local MEG Foundation Education(Free pre and primary education of local poor children, meals for the 200 children in school, provide literacy classes to local Adults
Kigali City, Gasabo 11,700,000 11,700,000
Local Poverty Reduction, Education and Family Empowerment in Rwanda (PREFER)
Education ( distribute school supplies to 3 schools to 1500 students construction of class rooms, school kitchen, tuition fees payment, rehabilitation of existing
Musanze district 38,300,000 38.300,000
Rwanda Civil Society Mapping – Final Report
102
International or Local Name Activities Districts
Budget as Reported Budget RWf
classrooms
Local Seed of Hope Association Education Building a classroom, running the school
Gasabo 340,000,000 340,000,000
Local Africa Transformation Network Education (IT training and equipment, Business start up consulting, literacy training material, online English training,
Kigali Kicukiro, Huye 35,365,000 35,365,000
Local African Community Empowerment
Construction of the school, equipping it, food for students, salaries of the staff and office utility
Nyagatare $526,769 313,427,555
Local Pilgrim Center for Healing and Reconciliation Ministries
Education Welfare -Payement du minerval pour 281 enfants, 72 enfants non accompagnés ont été hebergés
Kicukiro $77,867 46,330,865
Local Community Socio-Economic Development Initiative
Education (vocational training in Ruhango District, increase capacity of 30 cooperatives, increase entrepreneurship among cooperatives
Ruhango District in all sectors 27,912,800 27,912,800
Local International Choir Association and Instrumental Ensemble
Continuous Technical Education Kicukiro 5,500,000 5,500,000
Local MTN Foundation Education National 33,000,000 33,000,000
Local Association Saint Vincent de Paul
Education (distribution of scholastic materials, other education support
Rwamagana, different parishes and districts of the country
10,500,000 10,500,000
Local Friends of Handicap in Rwanda Education (Extension of deaf School, equipments , school materials, Training
Nyagatare, Gatunda Sector 25,000,000 25,000,000
Local Life World Mission Frontier Education ( more classes, renovation of old buidings at world Mission Ministries
Gasabo district 16,362,000 16,362,000
Local Fondation Artisans de la Paix et du Developpement aux Rwanda asbl
Education (Literacy- training) Rulindo 2,750,000 2,750,000
Local Inades Formation Rwanda Education Rulindo 23,246,943 16,346,943
Local Centre Marembo Education (community environmental awareness, youth vocational classes,
Gasabo 19,838,700 19,838,700
Rwanda Civil Society Mapping – Final Report
103
International or Local Name Activities Districts
Budget as Reported Budget RWf
Local Kunda Umwana Education ( construction of a Nursery School, training of teachers, school equipments
All VUP Sectors 5,441,511,240 5,441,511,240
Local Benishyaka Education (providing Tuition fees, accomondation, meals, scholastic materials
all districts, country wide 26,143,477 26,143,477
Local Young Women's Christian Association of Rwanda
Education (taking school dropouts back to school, helping 122 orphans at higher Institutions of Learning, Vocational training to orphans
Muhanga, Ruhango, Kamonyi, Rwamagana, Nyabihu an Kayonza
15,385,000 15,385,000
Local ASSIST Rwanda Education and training, sponsorship, counselling AIDS prevention awareness and Advocacy
National level 44,860,000 44,860,000
Local Technical and Vocational Schools Association in Rwanda (TEVSA)
Education (study strips, TOT, inter school exams, curriculum harmonisation ,industrial attachment, partnerships with other regional Institutions
National level 6,951,000 6,951,000
Local Reach the Children Of Rwanda International (RCRI)
Education. Construction of a boarding primary and a secondary school, Enrolling vulnerable children and providing them with scholastic materials.
Nyabihu, Kicukiro district, Kicukiro sector 2,503,238,826 2,503,238,826
Local Reseau Des Femmes Oeuvrant Pour Le Developpemnt Rural
Education National level 16,450,000 16,450,000
Local Handicapé Rwandais Rehabilité Réintegré dans ses Droits (HRD)
Promoting Education of children with disabilities
Muhanga 27,650,000 27,650,000
Rwanda Civil Society Mapping – Final Report
104
International or Local Name Activities Districts
Budget as Reported Budget RWf
Local Rwanda Multi- Learning Center Education.(buying classroom materials, recruitment of computer learners, English learners and music learners, buying bookshelves
Kigali ,Gasabo 12,942,000 12,942,000
Local Association of Ugandans in Rwanda
Education ( primary School) Gasabo 10,000,000 10,000,000
Local Never Again-Rwanda Education (Technical and Vocational Training for the young women leadership devt, training youth in initiating projects
Selected schools in Kigali city, all never again youth clubs, in Kicukiro, Huye, Bugesera, Kayonza, Gatsibo, Nyabihu, Muhanga, Gisagara and Nyarugenge Districts.
$187,000 107,899,000
Local Action for Integration Health Development (AHID)
Education ( train HITS in Leadership skills, youth on EDPRS
Gasabo 1,200,000 1,200,000
Local ASPIRE Education ( reduce literacy) Gasabo 3,000,000 3,000,000
Local HELP LIFE Education ( setting up youth outreach ministries, in secondary school
Gasabo 200,000 200,000
Local Hope Foundation Education( Providing school fees, and other requirements to vulnerable children
Ruhango 15,000,000 15,000,000
Local Education Rwanda Education welfare(providing scholastic materials to 400 vulnerable children,
Eastern province, Kigali ville, Rwamagana, Gasabo
30,000,000 30,000,000
Local Abajambo Education Rwamagana, Bugesera, Gasabo 18,000,000 18,000,000
Local Association des Religieux de la Compagnie de Jesus au Rwanda
Educational Support Gasabo, Huye and Rusizi 586,400,000 586,400,000
Local Association des Parents Pour l'Education de Kirehe (APEKI-AMIZERO)
Education Kirehe 29,400,000 29,400,000
Rwanda Civil Society Mapping – Final Report
105
International or Local Name Activities Districts
Budget as Reported Budget RWf
Local Action Nord-Sud Rwanda
Education Burera 27,500,000 27,500,000
Local JYA MU BANDI MWANA Education: School Construction Gasabo 400,000,000 400,000,000
Local ESPOIR DE L'ENFANT asbl Education Kayonza, Rwamagana, Kigali Ville 14,174,600 14,174,600
Local Dominicaines de l'Annociation Education Gakenke, 17,400,100 17,400,100
Local Association Rwandaise de Lutte Contre la Pauvrete (ALUPA)
Vocational Training Rulindo 57,258,750 57,258,750
Local Caritas-RWANDA Education support Gicumbi, Kigali Ville, Nyamagabe, Rusizi, Huye, Muhanga, Ngoma, Rubavu, Musanze
188,808,336 188,808,336
Local Congregation des Soeurs Abizaramariya
Education Ruhango, Huye 331,596,223 331,596,223
Local Association pour le Development Agro-Pastoral (ADAP)
Vulnerable Children (education), Musanze 10,062,100 10,062,100
Local African Evangelistic Enterprise (AEE-Rwanda)
Education support Rubavu, Kigali Ville €500,391.00 409,820,229
Local PEACE INTERNATIONAL SCHOOL
Education support Nyanza 81,000,000 81,000,000
Local CONGREGATION DE LA MISSION-PERES LAZARISTES
Social science research Gakenke 15,000,000 15,000,000
Local ACTION FOR COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
Education (Vocational and schooling support)
Nyagatare 2,050,000 2,050,000
Local Make a Difference Initiative Capacity Building (peer education) 13,905,000 13,905,000
Rwanda Civil Society Mapping – Final Report
106
International or Local Name Activities Districts
Budget as Reported Budget RWf
Local Transformational Leadership Center (TLC)
Education: Theological and Peace education
Kigali Ville $16,600.00 9,877,000
Local Children's Care and Protection in Rwanda (CCPRWA)
Education: elementary and vocational training
Rwamagana 22,916,000 22,916,000
Local Association des Etudiants et Eleves Rescapes du Génocide(AERG)
Administration and Operation Nyarugenge 25,883,000 25,883,000
Local Kigali Freedom School
Good Governance( fight Genocide Ideology, Survivor Advocacy)
Kicukiro, Gasabo, Nyarugenge 3,100,000 3,100,000
Local HOPE FOR THE FUTURE: HOFF Education, Health Gasabo 13,535,000 13,535,000
Local INTERNATIONAL YOUTH FELLOWSHIP
Education, Projects Gasabo 14,550,000 14,550,000
Local International Education Exchange
Education Gasabo $288,803 277,828,486
Local RWANDA MULTI-LEANING CENTRE: RMLC Local
Training Gasabo $2,330,000 2,241,460,000
Local RWANDA OUTREACH & COMMUNITY PARTNERS
Education Gasabo €272,000 222,768,000
Local UNIVERSAL ISLAMIC AND CULTURAL TRUST
Reintegration of Children Gasabo $243,600 234,343,200
Local WERNER KALKA FOUNDATION Education Gasabo 14,178,000 14,178,000
Local SURF: Survivor' fund Education, building Gasabo 17,500,000 17,500,000
Local COPAFE EDUCATION PARENTING Kayonza 121,400,000 121,400,000
Local AVEGA EDUCATION AND Developpement, Justice Kayonza
67,425,000 67,425,000
Local FAWE Rwanda Education - research project Kayonza
$16,100,344 15,488,530,688
Rwanda Civil Society Mapping – Final Report
107
International or Local Name Activities Districts
Budget as Reported Budget RWf
Local SUSO RWANDA Education Ruhango 285,200,000 285,200,000
Total Local RWF 30,431,604,118
Rwanda Civil Society Mapping – Final Report
108
ANNEX 15 - EDPRS 14 – SOCIAL PROTECTION
International or Local
Name Activities Districts Budget as Reported Budget RWf
International COMPASSION INTERNATIONAL Social welfare to vulnerable students All districts 7,138,598,604 7,138,598,604
International RWANDA AVENIR Assisting Genocide Survivors Bugesera 26,936,275 26,936,275
International RAFIKI FOUNDATION , Inc. Orphanages and schools Bugesera $225,500 134,172,500
International NIBAKURE CHILDREN'S VILLAGE
Social, education, health and housing for orphans
Bugesera $54,300 32,308,500
International RWANDA PARTNERS Poverty alleviation & Community Development
Bugesera . 25,144,200 25,144,200
International AQUADEV CENTRAL AFRICA Microfinance Gasabo 309,000,000 309,000,000
International UBUNTU EDMONTON Supporting programs for Genocide widows in Kimironko
Gasabo 103,000,000 103,000,000
International World Vision International Social welfare for vulnerable children 14 districts 510,000,000 510,000,000
International AEGIS TRUST Genocide related programs Gasabo 4,674,681,866 4,674,681,866
International LA BENEVOLENCIJA (RLB) Communication for reconciliation through media
Gasabo $417,914 342,271,566
International AKIRAH Operate Akilah Institute for Women Gasabo $203,700 121,201,500
International INTERNATIONAL ALERT Fostering social and economic reintegration and reconciliation
Gasabo& Gisagara $421,152 250,585,440
International SOS VILLAGES D'ENFANTS Social, Health, Education orphans & abandoned children
Gasabo, Gicumbi & Nyamagabe 1,520,796,108 1,520,796,108
International PLAN RWANDA Child centred Community Development
Gatsibo 1,622,000,000 1,622,000,000
International AVSI Health, education, economic development,..
Gatsibo, Kamonyi, Ruhango, Nyanza, Gicumbi
617.344.850 617,344,850
International JESUIT REFUGEE SERVICE(JRS) Nursery, education and training for refugees
Gicumbi & Karongi 410,743,980 410,743,980
Rwanda Civil Society Mapping – Final Report
109
International or Local
Name Activities Districts Budget as Reported Budget RWf
International SAVE THE CHILDREN Child protection Nyamagabe, Nyaryguru, Karongi US$200,000 119,000,000
International AMERICAN REFUGEE COMMITTEE (ARC) INTERNATIONAL
To provide water, sanitation, health care in refugee camp
Gicumbi, Gatsibo and Karongi 426,727,984 426,727,984
International ZOE MINISTRY/Rwanda socioeconomic program(Empowering orphans and other vulnerable children
Huye, Nyaruguru, Gisagara 187,526,744 187,526,744
International GLOBAL CIVIC SHARING RWANDA
Micro-credit loans, basic health and Sanitation.
Kamonyi 176,104,000 176,104,000
International AFRICAN HUMANITARIAN ACTION
Health activities in refugee camps Karongi 375,092,680 375,092,680
International A VOICE OF RWANDA Support to orphans, vulnerable families.
Kicukiro 20,358,500 20,358,500
International CAFOD Psychosocial support to people suffering from trauma
Kigali city , Rubavu, Nyanza, Nyamagabe
$48,000 39,312,000
International PROJECT RWANDA Project Rwanda cargo bikes, train mechanics
Kigali city, Gakenke, Rubavu, Huye, Nyagatare, Musanze
$787,000 468,265,000
International INTERNATIONAL RESCUE COMMITTEE
Expanded impact child survival Kirehe, Ngoma $683,788 406,853,860
International FH ASSOCIATION/ RWANDA Community Development Program Education-Pay school fees , Distribution of Livestock-cows, agriculture: Provide fertilizers and manure to beneficiaries, health and nutrition
Muhanga, Kamonyi, Nyagatare, Muhanga, Ruhango, Gatsibo, Bugesera, Gisagara, Burera, Musanze, Nyamasheke and Rusizi
513,595,492 513,595,492
International E3 PARTNERS Community capacity building and development
Nyabihu, Kayonza and Nyagatare
$168,000 99,960,000
International NEW BEGINNING RWANDA Operate a Community center in Education and health services
Nyagatare 36,599,100 36,599,100
Rwanda Civil Society Mapping – Final Report
110
International or Local
Name Activities Districts Budget as Reported Budget RWf
International ADRA - RWANDA Education, Agriculture and Gender equality.
Nyagatare , Gatsibo ,Kayonza, Ngoma, Kirehe, Rwamagana, Bugesera, Karongi ,Rubavu, Nyabihu , Rutsiro, Burera, Gakenke, Rulindo &Gicumbi, Gasabo, Nyarugenge, Kamonyi, Muhanga
$2,527,205 1,503,686,975
International WORLD RELIEF RWANDA Economic Development Program: Savings for life, income generating activities promotion
Nyamasheke, Kicukiro , Musanze, Bugesera
74,903,853 74,903,853
International WORLD RELIEF RWANDA Child Development: provide life lessons (develop children physically, cognitively , socially and spiritually) children aged 7-12. Support OVC paying health insurance, and school fees. Provide water collection tanks and water sand filters to vulnerable families to help them to have access to clean water
Kicukiro 37,140,880 37,140,880
International CATHOLIC RELIEF SERVICES Food security, HIV/AIDs prevention, microfinance projects and peace building
Nyanza,Huye,Gisagara,Ruhango,Muhanga,Kamonyi,Kayonza,Gatsibo,Rwamagana,Ngoma and Rusizi
$10,761,070 6,209,137,390
International SAVINGS BANK FOUNDATION FOR INTERNATIONAL COOPERATION
Microfinance supervision through development and training of Microfinance Supervision
Nyarugenge $272,000 222,768,000
International WINROCK INTERNATIONAL Child Labor reduction through education
Nyarugenge, Nyaruguru, Gicumbi, Nyamasheke, Rubavu, Kayonza & Nyagatare
$1,584,421 942,730,495
Rwanda Civil Society Mapping – Final Report
111
International or Local
Name Activities Districts Budget as Reported Budget RWf
International FxB INTERNATIONAL Support for orhpans, vulnerable children and destitute families affected by Aids
Nyarugenge, Kicukiro, Rubavu, Muhanga, Nyamagabe
$842,430 501,245,850
International HUMAN HELP NETWORK Women empowerment , child right Promotion and child protection
Nyaruguru , Kicukiro, Gasabo, Rusizi, Nyamasheke, Nyamagabe, Huye
$247,000 202,293,000
International GLOBAL OUTREACH INTERNATIONAL
Support orphans , widows and street children by paying school fees and other rural projects
Nyaruguru, Musanze, Gasabo, Nyarugenge, Burera,
4,735,000 4,735,000
International MERCY MINISTRIES INTERNATIONAL(MMI)
community development ,empowerment ,healing and reconciliation
Rubavu and Gicumbi s $22,000 13,090,000
International FEMMES DEVELOPMENT asbl Micro finance, child villages and health centres
Ruhango & Nyamasheke 73.200.000 73,200,000
International RUANDA STIFTUNG Social and alimentary support for poor families
Rulindo $108,611 104,483,782
International WOMEN FOR WOMEN INTERNATIONAL
Life skills training, direct financial aid, farming hair dressing, tailoring
Rwamagana, Gasabo, Muhanga, Kayonza
694,212,690 694,212,690
International AFRICAIRE Emergency humanitarian Aid Rwamagana, Gasabo ,Kicukiro $368,051 218,990,345
International Care International Microfinance Bugesera $49,027 29,171,065
International PASAB Microfinance Bugesera 500,000,000 500,000,000
International Tear Fund Microfinance Bugesera 6,000,000 3,570,000,000
International HIGA Ubeho Poverty Reduction, Cooperatives Bugesera $570 339,150
International Accord Rwanda Social Economic Bugesera 46,000,000 46,000,000
International ACORD Socio Economic Development Kamonyi 19,589,102 19,589,102
International CARE Social Protection Kamonyi $76,000 45,220,000
International CHF International Social Protection Kamonyi $407,232 242,303,040
Rwanda Civil Society Mapping – Final Report
112
International or Local
Name Activities Districts Budget as Reported Budget RWf
International SURF Genocide Survivors Kamonyi 19,500,000 19,500,000
International Women Development Micro Finance Kamonyi 10,000,000 10,000,000
International CARITAS KABGAYI Social Protection Kamonyi $67,783 40,330,885
International CEFAPE Kamonyi Disabled, Agriculture Kamonyi 291,440,808 291,440,808
International COCOF Gender Promotion Kamonyi $48,317 39,571,623
International DUTERIMBERE Women Promotion (Microfinance) Kamonyi 12,810,000 12,810,000
International PDK Socio Economic Development Kamonyi 220,000,000 220,000,000
International ADPR/TURAMIRANE Social Protection Kamonyi 40,404,700 40,404,700
International ARCT-RUHUKA Social Protection Kamonyi 3,139,000 3,139,000
International FXB Famille Muhanga 130,082,000 130,082,000
International WFWE Assistance financière aux femmes affectees par le genocide
Muhanga 127,530,000 127,530,000
International DUTERIMBERE Devpt economique de la femme (Entreprenariat), Microfinance
Muhanga 6,000,000 6,000,000
International Society for Women and Aids in Africa
VIH Muhanga 12,601,850 12,601,850
International Young Women’s Christian Association
Le bien être social : Santé et affaires sociales, Education, sport et culture, jeunesse, Bonne gouvernance, Genre et promotion de la femme SIDA
Muhanga 6,853,000 6,853,000
International Centre de Services aux Coopératives
promotion des groupements et Coopératives, Microfinance, Agri – élevage Développement, Auto promotion :
Muhanga 29,300,000 29,300,000
International RRP+ Coordination des associations des
PVVVIH+ Gasabo 6,466,060 6,466,060
International RWANDA AVENIR Formation professionnelle Gasabo 27,126,775 27,126,775
Rwanda Civil Society Mapping – Final Report
113
International or Local
Name Activities Districts Budget as Reported Budget RWf
International RWANDA CHAMBER FOUNDATION
Promoting business Gasabo $420,000 249,900,000
International Search for Common Ground conflict resolution Gasabo $231,411 137,689,545
International SOCIAL & SCIENTIFIC SYSTEMS, INC
M&E Technical support Gasabo $1,361,830 810,288,850
International STORIES FOR HOPE RWANDA capacity building Gasabo $42,425 25,242,875
International The Nyanya Project Social, Women empowerment Gasabo $115,270 68,585,650
International ANEW BEGINNING RWANDA Completion of community centre building
Nyagatare 75,897,000 75,897,000
International FONDATION DiDé Encadrement des mineurs incarcérés dans le Centre Correctionnel de nyagatare
Nyagatare 248,167,110 248,167,110
International AVOCATS SANS FRONTIERES:ASF
Training Gasabo $116,487 95,402,853
International Bridge2 Rwanda ICT Gasabo $29,460 17,528,700
International DEVELOPMENT ALTERNATIVES INC
Private Sector/ Environment Karongi, Nyaruguru, Nyamagabe, Rusizi, Nyamasheke
$29,525 17,567,577
International EDUCATION DEVELOPMENT CENTER INC
Employment Nyarugenge, Kicukiro, Gasabo $998,730 594,244,055
International INTERNATIONAL RESOURCES GROUP LT
Private Sector/ Environment Karongi, Nyaruguru, Nyamagabe, Rusizi, Nyamasheke
100,719 59,927,537
International NEVER AGAIN PROJECT Employment Musanze, Kicukiro, Gasabo, Kayonza
104,647 62,265,019
International AGHR Assistance sociale Ruhango 11,546,000 11,546,000
International COMPASSION EAR NYAMAGANA Assistance sociale et Evangelisation
Ruhango 29,769,400 29,769,400
Rwanda Civil Society Mapping – Final Report
114
International or Local
Name Activities Districts Budget as Reported Budget RWf
International COMPASSION BYIMANA Assistance sociale Ruhango 13,850,490 13,850,490
International UCF Assistance sociale Ruhango 2,721,000 2,721,000
International CARE INTERNATIONALE Santé et économique Ruhango 4,966,700 4,966,700
International AEE Assistance sociale et Evangelisation Ruhango 4,454,100 4,454,100
International HOPE FOUNDATION Assistance sociale Ruhango 246,320,000 246,320,000
International FEMMES DEVELOPPEMENT Developpement Ruhango 54,500,000 54,500,000
International UGAMA CSC Support cooperatives Ruhango 99,372,504 99,372,504
International CARITAS Education, santé, agriculture et elevage
Ruhango $52,878 43,307,082
International FH/RWANDA Education et developpement economique
Ruhango 17,815,920 17,815,920
International AVODI Encadrement des enfants orphelin Ruhango 12,000,000 12,000,000
International FTA Developpement Ruhango $15,000 12,285,000
International AVSI Assistance sociale Ruhango 126,817,900 126,817,900
International CARE Inernational SAFI Nyagatare, Gatsibo, Kayonza, Rwamagana, Kirehe, Bugesera
$147,308 87,648,260
International CARE Inernational ISARO Ruhango, Nyanza, Gisagara,
Huye, Nyamagabe & Nyaruguru
$102,719 61,117,805
International CARE Inernational NISU All districts $35,945 21,387,275
International CARE Inernational COSMO Musanze, Kamonyi & Muhanga districts while
$201,170 119,696,150
Total RFW 40,418,860,424
Local Poverty Reduction, Education and Family Empowerment in Rwanda (PREFER)
Poverty reduction, social welfare (distribution of 100 goats to vulnerable families, sewing lesson to 3 women, making soap, mutuelle
Musanze district 3,950,000 3,950,000
Rwanda Civil Society Mapping – Final Report
115
International or Local
Name Activities Districts Budget as Reported Budget RWf
payment.
Local Africa Transformation Network Community empowerment(train Vulnerable Women in sewing, sports activities and leadership training workshop, completion of small community projects
Kicukiro 9,200,000 9,200,000
Local Association des Etudiants et Eleves Rescapes du Génocide(AERG)
social welfare ( Visiting survivors at school, helping those without homes
Kicukiro 6,171,473,754 6,171,473,754
Local MTN Foundation social welfare National 33,000,000 33,000,000
Local Association Saint Vincent de Paul
Social protection Nyarugenge 31,800,000 31,800,000
Local Friends of Handicap in Rwanda Social Welfare ( sewing Machines for disabled people
Nyagatare, Gatunda Sector 7,550,000 7,550,000
Local Life World Mission Frontier improve standard of living of vulnerable people
Kigali City 7,000,000 7,000,000
Local Fondation Artisans de la Paix et du Developpement aux Rwanda asbl
Social Welfare( street kids CARE and training)
Kigali City 2,500,000 2,500,000
Local Center for Adduction and Psychosocial Orientation
Social welfare ( creation of anti drug abuse clubs, training of trainers, prison guards and students on drug types, physical and Health problems linked to the abused, counselling, GBV especially in schools.
Kigali city, Northern province and eastern province
47,836,400 47,836,000
Local Inades Formation Rwanda Gender Bugesera 24,076,820 24,076,820
Local Safer Rwanda Awareness raising on Illicit SALW Musanze, Kamonyi, Gicumbi, Bugesera, Kayonza
18,800,000 18,800,000
Local Centre Marembo Social Welfare (Provide food, Gasabo 26,577,935 26,577,935
Rwanda Civil Society Mapping – Final Report
116
International or Local
Name Activities Districts Budget as Reported Budget RWf
accommodation, school fees, uniform, materials, counselling, security, clothing.)
Local Association Ihorere Munyarwanda
social economic development ( Support to cooperatives of sex workers
All districts of Sothern Province 52,000,000 52,000,000
Local Nsanga Gender Promotion sensitization and training, Good Governance, Unity and reconciliation
Hure District 122,184,000 122,184,000
Local Christian People for Humanitarian Action (CPHA)
Social Economic welfare (form cooperatives, training of members, development income generating projects
Kicukiro and Musanze Districts 27,000,000 27,000,000
Local Rwanda Link Social Welfare (Orthopaedic Material) MVK 11,205,000 11,205,000
Local MULINDI JAPAN ONE LOVE Social Welfare (Orthopaedic Material) MVK $15,000 8,925,000
Local The Streets Ahead Children's Centre Association
Social Welfare (provide food, medical, water, care clothing, integration of older youth,
Kayonza 37,671,588 37,671,588
Local ASSIST Rwanda Cottage Industry (reinforcement of ASSIST Cottage Industries including Tailoring, Knitting, Soap, candle, Shoe polish and craft Production
Nyagatare, Bugesera, 30,360,000 30,360,000
Local BENIMPUHWE social welfare (capacity building of Urban and rural school dropouts, education of vulnerable children
Gisagara 22,000,000 22,000,000
Local Youth Generation with a Vision
Social wellbeing Gasabo 150,000 150,000
Local Under AgeChristian Mission Social welfare protection renting places for baby care takers, recruiting
Rubavu 100,500,000 100,500,000
Rwanda Civil Society Mapping – Final Report
117
International or Local
Name Activities Districts Budget as Reported Budget RWf
caretakers, training child mothers, community campaigns on child protection, empowering child mothers financially
Local Better Life (BLAO) Achievement Organisation
Social welfare(wielding and carpentry and English for vulnerable people)
Gasabo 2,400,000 2, 400,000
Reseau Des Femmes Oeuvrant Pour Le Developpemnt Rural
Gender All districts 34,580,000 34,580,000
Local Duterimbere Social welfare (integrating handicapped and HIV+ positive people in the community.)
Nyagatare, Muhanga, Gatsibo and Nyarugenge
25,000,000 25,000,000
Local Association Genrale des Handcapes du Rwanda
Economic welfare (Vocational training for people with disability, school fees for young PWD providing financial assistance to cooperatives of PWD.
Kicukiro, Huye and Musanze 77,750,000 77,750,000
Local Love and Hope- Bugingo Economic devt (community development by transforming PVVIH associations into cooperatives and training.
Kayonza district 2,864,385 2,864,385
Local Inter-church Youth Foundation Development ( sewing and selling of clothes)
Kicukiro District 6,650,000 6,650,000
Local Kigali Hope Association social welfare ( creation of cooperatives
Nyarugenge 2,000,000 2,000,000
Local Association Abizerana Social Welfare ( assistance to students, to the sick
Kigali 1,021,000 1,021,000
Local Association Pour (APTM) la Promotion des Travaux Ménager
social welfare (sewing training, child labour fight
Musanze 3,730,000 3,730,000
Local Famille Maintenant social welfare (counselling of HIV + Nyarugenge and Kanombe 300,000 300,000
Rwanda Civil Society Mapping – Final Report
118
International or Local
Name Activities Districts Budget as Reported Budget RWf
People
Local Association Non Crime-Rwanda
Gender ( fight against Gender Based Violence)
Burera and Kayonza 21,642,120 21,642,120
Local National Organisation of User and Survivals of Psychiatry
Social Economic (Basket weaving, Chicken Layering and Agriculture)
Kicukiro and Kayonza and Nyagatare districts
26,167,900 26,167,900
Local Association Mwenemuntu social welfare (supply of scholastic materials, follow up of students, training of bicycle repair, distribution of bicycle to opinion leaders
Huye, Ngoma 15,576,254 15,576,254
Local TABARA social &Economic welfare ( Cultivation of Pineapple)
Burera 1,000,000 1,000,000
Local Rock Fellowship Ministries( R.F.M)
Social Welfare( giving food, cloth to Orphans, giving goats, pigs chicken to families, training them in business
Gatsibo 7,700,000 7,700,000
Local Association National de Soutien aux Personnes vivant avec le VIH/SIDA (ANSP+)
Trade (Income Generating Activities) Gasabo 7,890,000 7,890,000
Local ASPIRE Social welfare(sensitization on dander of alcoholism, Handling domestic violence
Gasabo 2,700,000 2,700,000
Local Voice of Community Organisation
Gender and Human rights (Training local leaders on GBV
Kicukiro District 900,000 900,000
Local Rwanda Development Solutions (RDS)
Social Welfare ( AIDS prevention, care and counselling), TB and Malaria social Mobilisation & gender promotion
Nyamagabe, Gasabo, Nyarugenge, Kicukiro Nyagatare, Rusizi
132,503,000 132,503,000
Local Hope Foundation Social welfare( support to the elderly Ruhango 20,000,000 20,000,000
Local GREAT LAKES CENTER FOR CULTURE, PEACE AND DEVELOPMENT (GLCPD)
Poverty Reduction Nyaruguru $43,250 25,733,750
Rwanda Civil Society Mapping – Final Report
119
International or Local
Name Activities Districts Budget as Reported Budget RWf
Local Abajambo Social Protection (OVC, old age) Rwamagana, Bugesera, Gasabo 53,500,000 53,500,000
Local Association Pour la Promotion des Initiative de base (APIB)
Capacity Building for Poverty Reduction
Gakenye 27,165,122 27,165,122
Local SERUKA asbl Poverty Reduction Gasabo, Nyarugenge, Bugesera, Muhanga
50,247,000 50,247,000
Local ASSOCIATION DE RECHERECHE ET D'APPUI AUX MOUVEMENTS ASSOCIATIFS (ARAMA)
Gender and Family Promotion (GBV) Ngoma 164,801 134,972,019
Local Grain de Seneve (GDS) Social Portection: Family care for Children and their education
Musanze 30,905,275 30,905,275
Local Action Nord-Sud Rwanda Micro Credit Finance Burera 33,000,000 33,000,000
Local JYA MU BANDI MWANA Social Protection Gasabo, Rulindo, Nyarugenge, Kicukiro
1,000,000 1,000,000
Local Institution d'Appui aux Agri-Eleveurs de Busasamana (I.A.BU asbl)
Social Protection Rubavu, Nyabihu 5,050,000 5,050,000
Local Pilgrim Center for Healing and Reconciliation Minitries
Social Protection Kicukiro, Kamonyi, Nyagatare 24,200 14,399,000
Local Association Rwandaise de Lutte Contre la Pauvrete (ALUPA)
Social Protection (OVC) Nyaruguru 3,000,000 3,000,000
Local Caritas-RWANDA Social Protection Huye, Ngoma, Rubavu, Kigali Ville, Musanze, Karongi, Rutsiro, Gicumbi, Rusizi, Huye, Muhanga, Ruhango, Nyamagabe
500,838,464 500,838,464
Local Congregation des Soeurs Abizaramariya
Poverty Reduction and Income Generation
Huye, Gisagara 167,954,432 167,954,432
Local Association des Veuves du Social Protection Nyarugenge, Gasabo, Muhanga, 300,863,410 300,863,410
Rwanda Civil Society Mapping – Final Report
120
International or Local
Name Activities Districts Budget as Reported Budget RWf
Genocide Agahozo (AVEGA) Kamonyi, Kicukiro, Rusizi, Nyamasheke
Local Association pour le Bien etre Social (A.B.E.S)
Social Protection: HIV, Food security, capacity
Musanze, Rulindo 27,718,520 27,718,520
Local Association pour le Development Agro-Pastoral (ADAP)
Social Protection Musanze, Gasabo 13,503,500 13,503,500
Local African Evangelistic Enterprise (AEE-Rwanda)
Capacity Building: Orphans and Child rights, Community development, Poverty Reduction
Rwamagana, Muhanga, Huye, Nyamagabe, Rubavu, Gatsibo, Bugesera
630,226,907 630,226,907
Local CONGREGATION DE LA MISSION-PERES LAZARISTES
Street Children Muhanga 2,000,000 2,000,000
Local ACTION FOR COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
Gender sensitisation Kicukiro 8,000,000 8,000,000
Local AHLUL BAIT ISLAMIC FOUNDATION
Credit Financing, capacity building Gasabo 1,200,000 1,200,000
Local Urunana/Triat d'Union Social Protection Nyarugenge, Gasabo, Muhanga, Kamonyi, Kicukiro, Rwamagana, Kayonza, Bugesera, Gisagara, Gatsibo, Ngoma, Huye
138,659,910 138,659,910
Local Concern and Care for the Needy in Rwanda
Social Protection Rubavu, Rutsiro, Karongi, Nyamasheke, Rusizi, Muhanga, Kamonyi
16,000,000 16,000,000
Local Action Pour le Developpement Rural Integre(DUHAMIC-ADRI)
Social Protection (OVC, access to services)
Muhanga, Rulindo, Ruhango 186,003,540 186,003,540
Local BAMPOREZE Social Protection: Capacity Building of OVC
Rulindo 42,201,400 42,201,400
Local Solace Ministries Social Protection: Orphan care, shelter homeless and fight poverty
Kigali Ville, Bugesera, Nyamagabe, Kamonyi,
329,400,000 329,400,000
Rwanda Civil Society Mapping – Final Report
121
International or Local
Name Activities Districts Budget as Reported Budget RWf
Rwamagana, Nyanza, Huye,
Local Association Saint Vincent de Paul
Income generating all districts 14,800,000 14,800,000
Local Fondation Artisans de la Paix et du Developpement aux Rwanda asbl
Economic Devt( Bicycle Credit, Women Training)
Bugesera 7,500,000 7,500,000
Local The Streets Ahead Children's Centre Association
Social economic (Chicken project, hand craft, T-shirt printing, Soap Making
Kayonza 2,441,100 2,441,100
Local The Streets Ahead Children's Centre Association
Administration & Operations Kayonza 47,644,500 47,644,500
Local Benishyaka Economic Empowerment (Basket weaving for widows training
Kirehe District 5,080,000 5,080,000
Local Benishyaka Administration (institutional strengthening and operational capacity
Nyagatare and Kigali City 44,342,574 44,342,574
Local Young Women's Christian Association of Rwanda
Economic Development (forming self help, associations, financing youth with projects, training
Muhanga, Ruhango, Kamonyi, Rwamagana, Nyabihu an Kayonza
84,325,901 84,325,901
Local Young Women's Christian Association of Rwanda
Good governance (contribution in African child day, omens day, provide financial support to OVC, Support exchange visits, support OVC forums at District level.
Muhanga, Ruhango, Kamonyi, Rwamagana, Nyabihu an Kayonza
13,750,000 13,750,000
Local Youth Generation with a Vision Economic devt (Preparation, implementation and monitoring and evaluation of project (taxi moto & public secretariat)
Gasabo 11,491,540 11,491,540
Local Reseau Des Femmes Oeuvrant Economic empowerment of women Northern Province 380,300,000 380,300,000
Rwanda Civil Society Mapping – Final Report
122
International or Local
Name Activities Districts Budget as Reported Budget RWf
Pour Le Developpemnt Rural
Local Reseau Des Femmes Oeuvrant Pour Le Developpemnt Rural
Institutional devt National level 19,984,000 19,984,000
Local Duterimbere Capacity Building(training and sensitization & study tours of women entrepreneurs, pineapple and mushroom value chain, mushroom
Nyagatare, Muhanga, Kirehe, Kigali city, Gisagara and Gasabo.
166,112,775 166,112,775
Local Soeur Inshuti z'Abakene Good governance (fighting corruption using umucyo radio trade fair outreach)
expo grounds, using umucyo radio
34,896,740 34,896,740
Local Rural Environment and Development Organisation
Economic Development (continue with the activities of the 3 yr project, facilitate 35 people representing cooperatives for study tours, sensitizing Vulnerable groups
Musanze, Burera, Rutsiro 41,982,184 41,982,184
Local ASPIRE Economic Development (conduct training on cooperative formation and mgt, book keeping, accounts and marketing,
Gasabo 4,000,000 4,000,000
Local ASSIST Rwanda Cottage Industry (reinforcement of ASSIST Cottage Industries)
Nyagatare, Bugesera, 30,360,000 30,360,000
Local Rwanda Development Solutions (RDS)
Capacity Building in cooperatives and Associations
Rulindo and Nyabihu District 39,674,000 39,674,000
Local Cooperate Out of Poverty (Coop-Rwanda)
Economic Development (capacity building of Ex combatants in entrepreneurship &ICT, Customer care, marketing, accounts. Micro finance development
10 district from Kigali city $313,583 180,937,391
Local Association des Travailleurs Capacity Building: Domestic and Hotel Kigali Ville 1,018,000 1,018,000
Rwanda Civil Society Mapping – Final Report
123
International or Local
Name Activities Districts Budget as Reported Budget RWf
Domestique au Rwanda (TRADORWA)
Workers
Local African Evangelistic Enterprise Developpement Socio-économique des groupement des Femmes et enfants, evangelisation
Muhanga 43,805,069 43,805,069
Local Ahl-ul bayt Islamic Foundation: ABIF
Affaires sociales Gasabo 40,890,000 40,890,000
Local African Evangelistic Enterprise Rwanda
Prise en charge aux PVV à domicile ,OVC&IEC/CCC
Gasabo 65,715,725 65,715,725
Local Action Sociale Educative pour le développement communautaire (ASEDC)
Assistance aux OVCs Gasabo 12,626,592 12,626,592
Local Association pour la promotion des vulnérables: APV
OVCs Gasabo 87,630,000 87,630,000
Local As we forgive-Rwanda initiative
Reconciliation Gasabo $150,000 89,250,000
Local INTERNATIONAL JUSTICE MISSION: IJM
Legal Aid Gasabo 420,735,060 420,735,060
Local ISHAMI ADVOCACY FOR CHILDREN
OVC Gasabo $7,403,320 4,404,975,400
Local Kacyiru twakora Iki Social, Education Gasabo 14,170,500 14,170,500
Local KIGALI SHARKS RUGBY FOOTBALL CLUB
Rugby, Empower the youth, peace Gasabo 1,666,500 1,666,500
Local WORLD LEARNING Unity & reconciliation Gasabo $130,000 77,350,000
Local WORLD VISION Poverty reduction Gasabo $418,662 249,103,890
Local E3 partners Ministry G'irinka mu Nyarwanda Kayonza $2,800 1,666,000
Local BARAKABAHO Foundation OVC Kayonza $415,765 247,380,175
Local Conseil protestant du Rwanda Social counselling Kayonza 8,000,000 8,000,000
Rwanda Civil Society Mapping – Final Report
124
International or Local
Name Activities Districts Budget as Reported Budget RWf
Local Croix Rouge Rwandaise Food security; environment; social protection
Kayonza 47,287,545 47,287,545
Local SACCA The streets Ahead Protection, Reintegration - Street children
Kayonza 102,000,000 102,000,000
Local CREDI Amahugurwa Iterambere ry'icyaro Kayonza 53,000,000 53,000,000
Local ARCT RUHUKA YOUTH PSYCHOSOCIAL (TRAUMA, UNITY &RECONCILIATION)
Kayonza 14,524,000 14,524,000
Local NCA Mosaic fondation Kayonza 4,425,000 4,425,000
Local DUTERIMBERE Local Economic development (Women empowerment )
Nyagatare $1,258 748,510
Local IMPAKOMU Cooperative Ruhango 41,345,300 41,345,300
Local CARE LIFE ASSOCIATION Assistance sociale et Evangelisation Ruhango $1,000,000 595,000,000
Local EPR RUHANGO Education et evangelisation Ruhango 70,000,000 70,000,000
Total Local RWF 17,753,212,976