Date post: | 10-Apr-2015 |
Category: |
Documents |
Upload: | api-3784079 |
View: | 346 times |
Download: | 1 times |
104/11/23
FABRICATION AND CHARACTERIZATION OF
Au/n-Si/Au METAL SEMICONDUCTOR METAL
STRUCTURE
By
SOUMO GHOSALSHRABANI SAMADDAR
204/11/23
Detector Technologies
MSM( Metal Semiconductor Metal)
PIN
APD
Waveguide
Contact InP p 1x1018
Multiplication InP n 5x1016
Transition InGaAsP n 1x1016
Absorption InGaAs n 5x1014
Contact InP n 1x1018
Substrate InP Semi insulating
Semiinsulating GaAs
Contact InGaAsP p 5x1018
Absorption InGaAs n- 5x1014
Contact InP n 1x1019
Absorption Layer
Guide Layers
Simple, Planar, Low CapacitanceLow Quantum Efficiency
Trade-off Between Quantum efficiency and Speed
High efficiencyHigh speedDifficult to couple into
Gain-Bandwidth: 120GHzLow NoiseDifficult to makeComplex
Key: Contact layers
Layer Structure Features
Absorption Layer
3
MSM Detectors
Semi insulating GaAs
Simple to fabricate
Quantum efficiency: MediumProblem: Shadowing of absorption region by contacts
Capacitance: Low
Bandwidth: HighCan be increased by thinning absorption layer and backing with a non absorbing material. Electrodes must be moved closer to reduce transit time.
Compatible with standard electronic processes
GaAs FETS and HEMTs InGaAs/InAlAs/InP HEMTs
To increase speeddecrease electrode spacingand absorption depth
Absorptionlayer
Non absorbing substrate
E Fieldpenetrates for ~ electrode spacinginto material
Simplest Version
Schottky barriergate metal
Light
04/11/23
4
Schottky Contacts and Ohmic Contacts Compared
04/11/23
Schottky contact is to GaAs doped at 1015 cm-3
Ohmic contact resistance is 104 Ωcm2.
Contacts satisfy Ohm's law. Semiconductor is very highly doped. Schottky barrier depletion region very thin depletion layer becomes quite transparent for electron tunneling.Better to use a metal with a work function m, which is equal to or smaller than the work function of a semiconductor, s.
504/11/23
A Comparative Study of Si and GaAsMetal-Semiconductor-Metal Photodetectors
604/11/23
BEAKER CLEANING
WAFER CLEANING DI water and ultrasonically agitation. Boiled with hot (TCE) at 80 to 850C for 10-15min. TCE is removed by acetone. Acetone is removed by rinsing with DI water. Soln of NH4OH , H2O2 and H2O at the ratio of 1:1:8 , and kept it for 10-15 minutes at 80 to 850C & then rinsed with DI water A solution (8 : 2 : 1 parts by volume of H2O : H2O2 : HCl ) at 60-70oC for about 10 minutes to remove heavy metals. Dipped for few seconds in 10% solution of HF to remove the SiO2 layer. Cleaned with DI water to make it hydrophobic.
704/11/23
WAFER SPECIFICATIONS :
Crystal Orientation: <111>[n-type]Substrate resistivity: 1.5 ohm cmWafer thickness: 300 25 μm
The Ultrasonic Vibrator
+-
804/11/23
METALLIZATION
HIGH VACUUM CREATIONDEPOSITION OF METAL ON ONE SIDE RETURNING TO NORMAL CONDITIONS DEPOSITION OF METAL ON OTHER SIDE
904/11/23
Electron Beam Generator Penning Gauge Metallization Unit
Vacuum ChamberVacuum Measuring Gauges
1004/11/23
PHOTOLITHOGRAPHY & ETCHINGWafer is subjected to photoresist(-ve) and then it was rotated at 2500rpm in a photoresist spinner .
Wafer heated at a temperature of 100 ºC for 15 min in a hot air oven to increases the resist adhesion to wafer. Exposed to U-V light through a photomask for 5 mins. Under exposition of light, the wafer became hard.
Dissolved in developer solution
Removal of the developer by rinsing .
Post-baked in order to dry-out for at least 20 min at 125ºC. Post- baking makes the image permanent.
1104/11/23
The Circuit set up for I-V Measurement
1204/11/23
IV Characteristics of MSM structure with and without Illumination
-80
-60
-40
-20
0
20
40
60
80
-0.5 -0.4 -0.3 -0.2 -0.1 0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6
Voltage (V)
Cu
rren
t (m
A)
1304/11/23
CV Characteristics
0
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20
Bias Voltage (volts)
Cap
acit
ance
(p
F)
Characterization
1404/11/23
The FESEM Instrument used at IACS, Jadavpur for study of surface morphology
1504/11/23
1604/11/23
Surface Characterisation
1704/11/23
Cross Sectional SEM
1804/11/23
Cross Sectional View of the lower junction
1904/11/23
EDAX analysis of Pos1 showing presence of Au,Cr and Si
20
Qualitative and Quantitative Analysis of Pos1 of the
Sample
04/11/23
21
Bibliography
1. Chou, S. Y., Liu, Y. and Fischer, P. B., Appl. Phys. Lett. 61,477 (1992).
2. Physics of Semiconductor Devices, Second edition, S. M. Sze, Wiley & Sons, 1981, Chapter 5.
3. Device Electronics for Integrated Circuits, Second edition, R.S. Muller and T. I. Kamins, Wiley & Sons, 1986, Chapter 3. 4. Physica Scripta. Vol. T69, 163-166, 1997 A Comparative Study of Si and GaAs Metal-Semiconductor-Metal Photodetectors K. Honkanen,' T. Siirtola,' T. Majamaa,' A. Hovinen' and P. Kuivalainen','
5. “Fabrication and modelling of SOI and GaAs MSM Photodetectors and GaAs based photreceivers.” - Dissertation for the degree of Doctorate in Technology by Katri. Honkanen, Helsinki University of of Technology.
6. “Current transport in Metal – semiconductor Barriers”-C. R. Crowell & S. M. Sze solid state electronics , 9, 1035 . ( 1966 )
7.Solid State Electronic Devices. B .G .Streetman
8. Semiconductor Opto-Electronic Devices .Pallab Bhattacharya 04/11/23
2204/11/23