Date post: | 18-Jan-2016 |
Category: |
Documents |
Upload: | wilfrid-bailey |
View: | 222 times |
Download: | 0 times |
Final Seminar, Paris, 14 - 15 April 2008
ASAS in the SESAR Master Plan
Fraser McGibbon (BAE Systems)
Andy Barff (EUROCONTROL EEC)
ASAS-TN2 Seminar
Paris
15 April 2008
Final Seminar, Paris, 14 - 15 April 2008
SESAR and the ASAS-TN2
• What has been presented already?– 4th Workshop, Amsterdam, April 2007
• How ASAS fits in the SESAR ConOps (Andy Barff)– 5th Workshop, Toulouse, September 2007
• Introduction to SESAR (Susanne Reed)• What ASAS brings to the SESAR ConOps (Andy Barff)
• What will you hear today?– What is the SESAR Master Plan?– Implementing the SESAR Master Plan– ASAS in the SESAR Master Plan
Final Seminar, Paris, 14 - 15 April 2008
What is the SESAR ATM Master Plan?
High Level Overview of the SESAR ATM Master PlanAgreed strategic guideline delivered by the SESAR Consortium, identifying the necessary activities at stakeholder group level.Will be published at www.sesar-consortium.aero.
D5
Agreed and Committed Implementation ActivitiesRenewed ECIP/LCIP
Planning Area / Working MaterialMore detailed information, including task deliverables from the SESAR Consortium. To be migrated to an ATM Master Plan web portal (www.atmmasterplan.eu)e-ATM Master Plan
D5 TaskDeliverables
• Plan for implementing the SESAR 2020 Target Concept• Roadmaps for Operational Evolutions, Enabler Development &
Deployment, plus Supporting Aspects (e.g. Regulation and Legislation)• Considers the lifecycle from feasibility up to deployment supported by
analysis of associated benefits, funding, finance and risks
Final Seminar, Paris, 14 - 15 April 2008
Stakeholder EngagementStakeholder Engagement
ATM Master Plan ManagementATM Master Plan Management
HOWWHOWHENWHAT
HOWWHOWHENWHAT
ValidationVerification
ValidationPlan
ValidationPlan
DeploymentFramework
DeploymentPlan
DeploymentPlan
Target ConceptArchitecture
R&DPlanR&DPlan
PerformanceFramework
TargetsTargets IR and CSIR and CS
RegulatoryFramework
StandardsStandards
StandardsFramework
Working ArrangementsAccountable / Responsible
Decision Calendar / Regular ReviewsLevel of Decision-Making
Development Framework
How will the Master Plan be executed?
Final Seminar, Paris, 14 - 15 April 2008
ATM Capability and Service Levels
CapabilityLevels
ServiceLevels
Investment(costs)
Benefits(performance)
Service providersinvest in higher…
Service providerswith higher capabilities
can deliver higher…
CapabilityLevels
Investment(costs)
Usersinvest in higher…
UsersWith higher capabilities
can use higher…
Widespread use ofhigher service levelsresults in higher…
• Capability levels are associated with Stakeholder systems, procedures, human resources, etc.
– N.B Revised since D3!
• Service levels are associated with operational services offered by a service provider and consumed by a service user
Final Seminar, Paris, 14 - 15 April 2008
Deployment and Implementation Packages
IP3IP2IP1
Time (Calendar Years)2006 07 08 09 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20
Cap
abili
tyLe
vel
Ser
vice
Leve
l
21 22 23 24 25
SL0 SL1 SL2 SL3 SL4 SL5
CL0 CL1 CL2 CL3 CL4 CL5
IP1 (2008 to 2013)
Implement short term initiatives & best practices
IP2 (2013 to 2020)
Deliver the 2020 concept by improving network cost-effectiveness & efficiency
IP3 (beyond 2020)
Achieve the SESAR long-term goals (most advanced features of the SESAR Concept)
Final Seminar, Paris, 14 - 15 April 2008
Implementing the Master Plan
AT
M S
ervi
ce L
evel
2013 2020 Date of Initial Operating Capability
2016 2025
Preparing trajectory based operationsATSAW, Manual S&M
1
R&D
Implementation
Available for Operations
2Implementing network-centric trajectory managementASPA-S&M
Available for Operations
Implementation
R&D
Available for Operations
Achieving advanced automation in a shared trajectory environmentASEP-ITP (initial ASEP applications)
3 Implementation
R&D
Rolling out current Best PracticesImpl.
Available for Operations0
Levels 2 & 3
SESAR Joint Undertaking R&D
Levels 0 & 1
Industry commits to deployment
2008
Extending operations with advanced separation modesASEP-C&P (advanced ASEP applications)
4
Available for Operations
Implementation
R&D “Innovative” R&D
5
Accommodating full 4D trajectory management based on user preferred trajectoriesASEP WV spacing, SSEP
Available for Operations
Implementation
R&D “Innovative” R&DLevels 4 & 5
SESAR JU R&D NOW
Technology choices need confirmation
Final Seminar, Paris, 14 - 15 April 2008
Levels 0 & 1
Industry commits to deployment
Final Seminar, Paris, 14 - 15 April 2008
Deploy ATSAW and Manual S&M(1090 ADS-B)
R&D
• Asses benefits of Manual S&M for different categories of TMAs in the ECAC Area
• Analyse the impact on runway throughput of relative Time Based Separation (ASPA-S&M) vs. Absolute Time Based Separation (RTA)
• Analyse and compare the use of single or multiple merging points for sequencing arrivals to the airport
• Assess benefits of ASEP-ITP over ATSA-ITP• Study how UAV Operations may be integrated with other managed air
traffic in an ASAS Separation environment
R&D
Implementation
Available for Operations
Time (Calendar Years)2006 07 08 09 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20
ATSAW in flight and on the surfaceATSA-ITP and ATSA-VSAManual ASAS S&M
Final Seminar, Paris, 14 - 15 April 2008
ATSAW and Manual S&M
• Equipment is available and is being deployed• ATSAW is being deployed to bring clear safety benefits on
the airport surface• ASPA-S&M is proving beneficial in pioneer projects (e.g.
UPS)• The key points are
– What opportunities are there in Europe and do TMAs need re-organisation?
– RTA techniques and ASAS still seem to be competing, can we identify clear benefits of integrating the two techniques?
– Will ATSA-ITP evolve to ASEP-ITP?– Will UAVs accelerate development of ASEP?
Final Seminar, Paris, 14 - 15 April 2008
Levels 2 & 3
SESAR Joint Undertaking R&D
Final Seminar, Paris, 14 - 15 April 2008
Capability Level 2 & 3 – Deploy ASPA and initial ASEP
R&D
• Assess the ASPA-S&M application for expected benefits versus absolute time based separation methods such as 2D Precision Trajectory Operations.
• Evaluate the ASPA-S&M and ASEP-ITP applications in mixed mode of operations.
• Analyse compatible algorithms for ground based tools and airborne separation applications.
1090 extended squitter
R&D
ImplementationAvailable for Operations
Time (Calendar Years)2006 07 08 09 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20
ASPA-S&M
R&D
Implementation
Available for Operations
ASEP-ITP
Review/Update 1090 standards to support ASAS spacing & initial separation
Final Seminar, Paris, 14 - 15 April 2008
ASPA-S&M
Additional issues to be addressed in the R&D:• Use of datalink for ASPA-S&M instructions
– The procedures could be potentially simplified by the use of the datalink capabilities which SESAR will bring
– Use of datalink will bring safety by reducing risk of confusion concerning target and/or spacing requirements
• Use of an ASPA application in the event that final approach spacing is very close to radar separation minima– As we deploy means of reducing runway occupancy, final approach spacing
will become closer, which on the one hand could be achieved very precisely with ASPA but will create problems if the spacing is close to or less than radar separation
– This means that the “upgrading” of this application to an ASEP application must be seriously considered
• Applicability of ASPA-S&M techniques in conjunction with the “curved path segments” now being deployed in RNP procedures which may affect merging and spacing algorithms
Final Seminar, Paris, 14 - 15 April 2008
Levels 4 & 5
SESAR JU R&D NOW
Technology choices need confirmation
Final Seminar, Paris, 14 - 15 April 2008
Capability Levels 4 & 5 – ASEP and SSEP
R&D
• Develop and validate the operating concept for the ASEP-C&P and Self Separation applications in mixed mode of operations. In particular, evaluate the impact of RNP/RCP/RSP on the separation minima (strategic or tactical).
• Compare alternative means of separation management like airborne self management; cooperative self-separation for business jets in low density high altitude airspace (e.g. above FL410) should be started as early as possible to validate the self-separation concept.
• Investigate potential Human Factor impact of the mixed mode operation on both pilots and controllers.
R&D
Implementation
Available for Operations
Time (Calendar Years)2006 07 08 09 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20
ASEP-C&P
R&D
Implementation
Available for Operations
ASEP Wake Vortex SpacingSelf Separation
Final Seminar, Paris, 14 - 15 April 2008
ASEP and SSEP
• Success of ASEP-ITP will expedite implementation of ASEP and SSEP applications thanks to early aircraft equipage and certification
• SESAR has emphasised ASEP “Crossing & Passing” whilst there are several other variations on the ASEP-C&P theme including overtaking and vertical transitions as identified by AP23– The research must not be limited just to lateral crossing but must
include all the other potential traffic configurations• As with ASPA the safety and simplicity of ASEP applications may well
be enhanced by the use of datalink to minimise confusion of misunderstanding– in particular when multiple targets are included in a situation
• ASEP may be useful for closely spaced parallel runway operations exploiting the possibility of the flight crew assuring separation between themselves and other aircraft on a closely spaced parallel approach removing the need for ground based monitoring
Final Seminar, Paris, 14 - 15 April 2008
Risks and other issues
Final Seminar, Paris, 14 - 15 April 2008
Risks: Failure to deliver the 2020 ATM Target Concept
ATM Service Level 0 & 1 Initiatives not homogeneously deployed
Regulatory Framework is unable to support implementation of the Target
Concept
Future work on the Target Concept exposes shortcomings in meeting design and performance targets
Future investment in SESAR by key stakeholders will not be secured
Delays to the availability of new technologies to support the Target
Concept
Governance Structure is not capable of ensuring successful deployment of
ATM Service Levels 2 to 5
No agreement on future defragmentation of European
airspace
Performance based approach not implemented
Failure to manage Human Resources, Human Performance, Social Factors
& Change Management
SWIM is not implemented in its correct form nor sufficiently early
ATM Service Level 2 to 5 Development and Implementation
ATM Service Level 0 & 1 Implementation
Institutional and Management Processes
Failure to deliver the 2020 ATM Target Concept and Associated Performance Benefits
Need YOU
Commitment, Alignment,
Drive
Final Seminar, Paris, 14 - 15 April 2008
Conclusions
• SESAR provides a great boost for ASAS applications by prescribing an environment which lends itself to many ASAS applications
• The SESAR technical developments in terms of ADS and datalink both bring significant opportunities to accelerate the safe implementation of ASAS applications
• Under SESAR, we need to ensure that communication and dissemination of ASAS progress is maintained
Overall:• We’ve come a long way in SESAR• The Definition Phase has now finished• ASAS is successfully there• …but now is just the beginning!
Final Seminar, Paris, 14 - 15 April 2008
Thank you