+ All Categories
Home > Documents > Final Talk 8-11am Tuesday , May 8, 2012

Final Talk 8-11am Tuesday , May 8, 2012

Date post: 14-Apr-2022
Category:
Upload: others
View: 1 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend
33
Final Talk 8-11am Tuesday , May 8, 2012 Your name: Speaker’s name: What is a one (or two) sentence summary of the main point of the talk. Was the talk well organized? Quality of slides? Write down one question for the presenter; one thing you didn’t understand. Was the student able to answer questions? Overall grade (10 is best, 1 is the worst):
Transcript
Page 1: Final Talk 8-11am Tuesday , May 8, 2012

Final Talk 8-11am Tuesday , May 8, 2012

Your name: Speaker’s name:

What is a one (or two) sentence summary of the main point of the talk.

Was the talk well organized? Quality of slides? Write down one question for the presenter; one thing

you didn’t understand. Was the student able to answer questions?

Overall grade (10 is best, 1 is the worst):

Page 2: Final Talk 8-11am Tuesday , May 8, 2012
Page 3: Final Talk 8-11am Tuesday , May 8, 2012
Page 4: Final Talk 8-11am Tuesday , May 8, 2012

Order of speakers:

Andrew

Sam

Abdel

Danylo

Conrad

Guannan

Page 5: Final Talk 8-11am Tuesday , May 8, 2012

Article: Fraser, Science mag. article—

microcavity, label-free. 10/10. Way cool! Very

clear presentation! It was a pleasure having you

in class.

Clear, simple motivation. Why it’s important.

Lots of pictures.

Have an introductory phrase and a concluding phrase for each slide.

Clear, short Conclusion

Have 10 slides

have about 1 slide/minute—fast

1.5 min/slide-reasonable

2 min/slide—reasonable but slow.

Page 6: Final Talk 8-11am Tuesday , May 8, 2012

Label-Free, Single-Molecule Detection

with Optical Microcavities

**Your Name**

Phys 598 Bio

Dec 2, 2007

Andrea M. Armani, Rajan P. Kulkarni, Scott E. Fraser, Richard C. Flagan, Kerry J. Vahala,

Science, 317, 783, 2007

Page 7: Final Talk 8-11am Tuesday , May 8, 2012

Motivation

• Current single molecule detection

techniques require labeling the target

molecule

• In my chosen paper the authors report a

highly specific and sensitive optical

sensor that allow for label-free detection

of single molecules

Page 8: Final Talk 8-11am Tuesday , May 8, 2012

Preparation of the toroid optical microcavity

Scanning electron micrograph of a toroid before (inset)

and after CO2 laser reflow.

Page 9: Final Talk 8-11am Tuesday , May 8, 2012

Optical Micrograph Rendering

Light is efficiently (>99%) coupled from the tapered optical fiber to the

“whispering gallery” mode of the toroid. These toroids have typical

Quality factors (Q) of 109.

Page 10: Final Talk 8-11am Tuesday , May 8, 2012

Experimental setup

• The optical fiber couples light

into the microcavity at a specific

frequency.

• For a ultra high Q micro-cavity like

the toroid, the binding of a single

molecule leads to a change

in the resonant wavelength (pm).

The high Q-value allows for the

sensitive detection of these pm

shifts.

Knight et. al., 22, 15, 1129, Optics Letters, 1997

Page 11: Final Talk 8-11am Tuesday , May 8, 2012

Single molecule detection

Detector

Laser

681.5 nm

Toroid

Aqueous chamber

Syringe for sample input

Page 12: Final Talk 8-11am Tuesday , May 8, 2012

IL-2 detection

Pure IL-2 IL-2 in serum

Page 13: Final Talk 8-11am Tuesday , May 8, 2012

Dose Response Curve

Shows that the microtoroid is capable of detecting concentration from aM to μM.

Page 14: Final Talk 8-11am Tuesday , May 8, 2012

Summary

The authors have developed a method that allows for reliable

detection of single molecules without the use of specific labels and

furthermore the detection system allows for detecting concentration

from the atto to micromolar range.

Thank You !

Page 15: Final Talk 8-11am Tuesday , May 8, 2012

Quantal photobleaching

Page 16: Final Talk 8-11am Tuesday , May 8, 2012
Page 17: Final Talk 8-11am Tuesday , May 8, 2012
Page 18: Final Talk 8-11am Tuesday , May 8, 2012
Page 19: Final Talk 8-11am Tuesday , May 8, 2012

My comments: ATPase rotation, Kinosita, Nature.

A brilliant piece of work. Good choice. Good that

you covered how they used gold particle. Excellent

conclusion. Very clear about 90 degree rotation.

Unclear about 30 degree rotation—they have two

possibilities, and how to distinguish between them.

9.5/10.

Page 20: Final Talk 8-11am Tuesday , May 8, 2012

Resolution of Distinct Rotational

Substeps by Submillisecond Kinetic

Analysis of F1-ATPase Nature 410(2001)

Single Molecule Biophysics

Your Name

Page 21: Final Talk 8-11am Tuesday , May 8, 2012

University of Illinois 25

One (or two) sentence summary

Page 22: Final Talk 8-11am Tuesday , May 8, 2012

University of Illinois 26

F0F1:Rotary Motor for ATP Production

γ-subunit of F0F1 rotary motor rotates in steps of

120°=90°+30°

Page 23: Final Talk 8-11am Tuesday , May 8, 2012

University of Illinois 27

Previous Study

ATP rotation

rotate the γ

subunit ATP

Time [s]

Rev

olu

tion

Yasuda, Cell 93, 1998

Time [s]

Rev

olu

tion

Low ATP concentration: Stepwise

high ATP concentration: Smooth

Due to viscous friction on the Actin filament

Page 24: Final Talk 8-11am Tuesday , May 8, 2012

University of Illinois 28

Improvement: Decrease the Particle Size

10-3 to 10-4 times smaller friction

10nm

15nm

40nm

2mM

2µM

load-dependent portion: (actin filaments)

stepwise rotation

Page 25: Final Talk 8-11am Tuesday , May 8, 2012

University of Illinois 29

3 ATPs per Revolution

R.P.S.~1/3 ATP hydrolysis rate

Michaelis-Menten kinetics

Km~15μM

3 ATPs per revolution

Full speed ~134 r.p.s.

Observation #1

Page 26: Final Talk 8-11am Tuesday , May 8, 2012

University of Illinois 30

The 120 step consists of 90 and 30 substeps

2mM

2μM

20μM

Time [ms]

Rev

olu

tions

only 120º steps

90º and 30º steps

90º and 30º steps

very fast, not captured in this setup

Observation #2 120º=90º+30º

Page 27: Final Talk 8-11am Tuesday , May 8, 2012

University of Illinois 31

Two ~1ms Reactions Before a Next Step

Histogram of times between two main steps (90° or

120°) Low ATP: exp(- k t)

High ATP: [exp(- ka t)- exp(-kb t)]

Observation #3 3 times constants: one for ATP binding and two~1ms for reaction

Page 28: Final Talk 8-11am Tuesday , May 8, 2012

University of Illinois 32

Proposed Mechanism

Hydrolysis:

mechanically silent

Substeps of 90° by ATP binding and 30° by product release

Page 29: Final Talk 8-11am Tuesday , May 8, 2012

University of Illinois 33

Conclusion

γ-subunit of F0F1 rotary motor rotates in steps of

120°=90°+30°

ATP binding

Product Release

Page 30: Final Talk 8-11am Tuesday , May 8, 2012

University of Illinois 34

Microscopy

• Laser dark field microscopy

• Light scattered by beads was collected

• The intensity distribution had a single large peak

and a second small peak at four times the intensity

of the first peak. Because an object smaller than the

wavelength scatters light in proportion to the

square of its volume, the peaks should correspond

to single and duplex beads.

• From the collected image the beam centroid was

obtained.

• For a bead of radius a, frictional drag is 38 a

Page 31: Final Talk 8-11am Tuesday , May 8, 2012

University of Illinois 35

• At 2mM ATP, 0° dwell time is ~0.02 ms which is

out of resolution of current experiment. Therefore

the dwell times are 90°.

green: 2-ms intervals before and after the main steps

Page 32: Final Talk 8-11am Tuesday , May 8, 2012

University of Illinois 36

Steps Are Fast

• The whole step completes

within ~0.25 ms. The

instantaneous stepping is well

above 1000 r.p.s.

• Presence of distinct and fast

~90° substeps is clear at all

[ATP]<60µM.

• Physiological [ATP]~ mM

Gray line is c is the theoretical curve

Page 33: Final Talk 8-11am Tuesday , May 8, 2012

University of Illinois 37

• Two ~1m rate constants can be explained by each

being release of one of the hydrolysis product

(phosphate or ADP). Or one being splitting of ATP

to ADP and phosphate and the other being release

of the two.


Recommended