Final Technical Report ECONOMIC VITALITY ANALYSIS STUDY...its vitality DIRECT Direct i occurring...

Final Technical Report

ECONOMIC VITALITY ANALYSIS STUDY

Prepared for:County of San Diego Airports

Prepared by:

June 2009

McC2008 FINAL Prepare

Coun June 20 Prepare

401 B Street,San Diego, CAwww.kimley

CLELLA8 ECON

L TECHN

ed for:

ty of Sa

009

ed by:

, Suite 600 A 92101 y‐horn.com

AN‐PALNOMIC

NICAL R

an Diego

LOMAC VITA

REPORT

o Airpo

R AIRPALITY A

rts

PORT ANALYYSIS

F inTech

1

al hnical Report


2

THIS PPAGE INTE

ENTIONA

Economic V

LLY LEFT

Vitality Anal

T BLANK

lysis 200

8

2008

EXECUTIV

Section 1

1.1 Intr

1.2 Me

1.3 Mc

1.4 Reg

1.4.1 C

1.4.2 Sa

1.5 Cur

1.5.1 G

1.5.2 A

Section 2

2.1 Dire

2.2 Dire

2.3 Dire

2.4 Ind

2.4.1

2.5 Sum

Section 3

3.1 Oth

3.2 Ind

Section 4

4.1 Stat

Section 5

5.1 Dire

5.2 Ind

8 Econom

VE SUMMARY

– STUDY BAC

roduction .....

thodology fo

Clellan‐Palom

gional Socioec

ity of Carlsba

an Diego Cou

rrent Econom

General Aviati

Airline Industr

– DIRECT AN

ect Employm

ect Income ...

ect Revenues

irect Impacts

Indirect Emp

mmary of Dire

– OTHER IND

her Indirect E

uced Employ

– TAX IMPAC

te and Local T

– IMPACTS F

ect Impacts ..

irect and Indu

mic Vitality A

Y ...................

CKGROUND .

.....................

r the Econom

mar Airport Ov

conomic Tren

d and North

unty ...............

mic Environme

on Outlook ..

y Outlook .....

ND INDIRECT

ent ...............

.....................

s ....................

s Due to Visito

ployment and

ect and Indire

DIRECT AND I

mployment, I

ment, Incom

CTS GENERAT

Tax Impacts ..

FROM AIRPO

.....................

uced Effects .

Analysis

Table

.....................

.....................

.....................

mic Vitality An

verview ........

nds ................

County West

.....................

ent ................

.....................

.....................

ECONOMIC IM

.....................

.....................

.....................

or Spending ..

d Income Gen

ect Impacts ...

INDUCED ECO

Income, and

e, and Reven

TED BY AIRPO

.....................

RT CAPITAL P

.....................

.....................

of Con

......................

......................

......................

nalysis ............

......................

......................

MSA ............

......................

......................

......................

......................

MPACTS OF A

......................

......................

......................

......................

nerated by Vis

......................

ONOMIC IMP

Revenue .......

ue .................

ORT ACTIVITI

......................

PROJECTS ......

......................

......................

ntents

.....................

.....................

.....................

.....................

.....................

.....................

.....................

.....................

.....................

.....................

.....................

AIRPORT ACT

.....................

.....................

.....................

.....................

sitor Spending

.....................

PACTS FROM

.....................

.....................

ES ................

.....................

.....................

.....................

.....................

.....................

.....................

.....................

.....................

.....................

.....................

.....................

.....................

.....................

.....................

.....................

TIVITY ...........

.....................

.....................

.....................

.....................

g ...................

.....................

AIRPORT ACT

.....................

.....................

.....................

.....................

.....................

.....................

.....................

F inTech

3

.....................

.....................

.....................

.....................

.....................

.....................

.....................

.....................

.....................

.....................

.....................

.....................

.....................

.....................

.....................

.....................

.....................

.....................

TIVITY ...........

.....................

.....................

.....................

.....................

.....................

.....................

.....................

a l hnical Report

.......... 7

.......... 9

.......... 9

........ 10

........ 11

........ 11

........ 13

........ 16

........ 17

........ 17

........ 19

........ 23

........ 23

........ 23

........ 23

........ 23

........ 24

........ 25

........ 27

........ 27

........ 27

........ 29

........ 29

........ 31

........ 31

........ 31


4

Section 6 – C

6.1 Compa

6.2 Compa

6.2.1 Bra

6.2.2 Bo

6.2.3 Bo

6.2.4 Ern

6.2.5 Wi

Section 7 – T

7.1 Total Ec

7.2 Estimat

7.2.1 Gro

7.2.2 Gro

APPENDIC

Appe

Appe

COMPARISON

arison with Pr

arison with O

adley Interna

b Hope Airpo

wman Field A

nest A. Love F

illow Run Airp

TOTAL ECONO

conomic Con

te of Future E

owth Scenario

owth Scenario

CES

endix A – Airp

endix B – Pap

N TO OTHER A

revious Studie

ther Airports

tional Airport

ort ................

Airport ..........

Field Airport

port ..............

OMIC IMPACT

tribution .....

Economic Imp

o One – FAA T

o Two – Desig

port Data Com

per Surveys

AIRPORTS .....

es .................

.....................

t ....................

.....................

.....................

.....................

.....................

TS AND ESTIM

.....................

pact ..............

TAF ...............

gnation as a R

mparison Tab

......................

......................

......................

......................

......................

......................

......................

......................

MATE OF FUT

......................

......................

......................

Reliever Airpo

ble

Economic V

.....................

.....................

.....................

.....................

.....................

.....................

.....................

.....................

TURE ECONOM

.....................

.....................

.....................

ort .................

Vitality Anal

.....................

.....................

.....................

.....................

.....................

.....................

.....................

.....................

MIC IMPACTS

.....................

.....................

.....................

.....................

lysis 200

.....................

.....................

.....................

.....................

.....................

.....................

.....................

.....................

S ...................

.....................

.....................

.....................

.....................

8

... 33

... 33

... 33

... 33

... 34

... 34

... 34

... 34

... 35

... 35

... 36

... 36

... 37

2008

Table 1

Table 1

Table 1

Table 1

Table 2

Table 2

Table 3

Table 4

Table 5

Table 7

Table 7

Table 7.

Exhibit

8 Econom

.1 – Historica

.2 – Historica

.3 – Historica

.4 – Historica

.1 – Off–Airpo

.2 – Summary

.1 – Summary

.1 – Estimate

.1 – Summary

.1 – Total Eco

.2 – Estimate

.3 ‐ Estimated

t 1.1 – Airport

mic Vitality A

l and Forecas

l and Forecas

l and Forecas

l and Forecas

ort Impacts R

y of Direct an

y of Induced E

d 2008 State

y of 2008 Cap

onomic Impac

d 2030 Total

d 2030 Total E

t Facilities

Analysis

List

st Population

st Employmen

st Medium Ho

st Population

Related to Vis

nd Indirect Eco

Economic Im

and Local Ta

pital Improvem

cts of McClell

Economic Im

Economic Imp

List o

t of Tab

Growth ‐ City

nt Growth ‐ C

ousehold Inco

and Employm

itor Spending

onomic Impa

pacts

x Impacts

ment Program

an‐Palomar A

mpacts – Grow

pacts ‐ Growt

of Exhi

bles

y of Carlsbad

City of Carlsba

ome‐City of C

ment Growth

g

cts

m Impacts

Airport in 200

wth Scenario O

th Scenario Tw

ibits

ad

Carlsbad

– San Diego

08

One

wo

FinTech

5

County

al hnical Report

14

14

15

16

24

25

28

29

31

35

36

37

12


6

THIS PAAGE INTE

ENTIONAL

Economic V

LLY LEFT

Vitality Anal

BLANK

lysis 200

8

2008

OVERVI

McClellangeneral services aSan DiegCaliforniacapabilitiecustoms olinkage foAirport sresorts abusiness pconduct bNorth Couthe Airpodollars osurroundi

STUDY

A 2008 conductedeconomicaffords thits vitality

DIRECT

Direct ioccurring airlines, operatorsthe follow

• $21by ta to

• $11gen

• Statapp

8 Econom

EW

n‐Palomar Aaviation, coacting as an ego County a. The globes of the airoperations, sor the Countyserves as thnd as a mepeople to trabusiness. Thunty jobs. Ecort generateof income ing local com

Economic Vid to assess tc impact Mhe local comy as an integra

IMPACTS

mpacts froat McCleairport m

s, and other twing:

1.96 million ithe 360 peopop 20 employ

16.62 millionerated by air

te and loproximately $

mic Vitality A

Airport provorporate andeconomic enand the Citybal reach ofport, with itserve to provy to a global ee gateway eans for locavel to and froe Airport is aconomic active hundreds

and revenmunities.

itality Analysthe importanMcClellan‐Palmunity, and al transportat

om on‐airpellan‐Palomarmanagement, tenants in 20

n personal iple employed er in the City

n in businrport industrie

ocal tax 10.23 million

Analysis

EXECUT

vides valuabd commercigine for Nory of Carlsbaf aircraft ans internationvide importaeconomy. Thto world‐claal and visitinom the area ta facilitator fvities related tof millions nue for th

sis Study wnce, value anomar Airpoto understantion element.

ort activitier Airport b

fixed bas008 resulted

ncome earne at the airpor

ness revenues

revenues

TIVE SUM

ble ial th d, nd nal nt he ss ng to or to of he

as nd ort nd .

es by se in

ed rt;

ue

of

IN

IndairMcmobu

•

•

•

•

•

IN

Inddirincaboin 200

•

•

•

•

MMARY

DIRECT IM

direct impaport econocClellan‐Palomovement, asiness in 2008

• Visitors t$273 per

• $23.34 mby 692McClellan

• $61.76 mby visitrestaurantransportproviders

• $2.72 mil65 peoplgeneratedbusinesse

• State aapproxim

DUCED IMP

duced impactrect and increases in emove the comthe San Dieg08, these imp

• 1,446 job

• $44.76 m

• $158.35 m

• State aapproxim

MPACTS

cts derived omic activitmar Airport and other 8 included:

o the area sday

million of persarea emplo

n‐Palomar Air

million of busiting passennts, retailation and

lion in persone, and $6.81d by expendies

and local ately $5.23 m

PACTS

ts reflect thendirect impamployment abined direct go‐Carlsbad‐Spacts included

s

illion in perso

million in reve

nd local ately $5.96 m

FinTech

7

primarily frties attribuair passengeron‐airport

spend an av

sonal incomeoyees supporport

iness sales gengers for ls store other rec

nal income e1 million in tures with of

tax revenmillion.

e multiplier eacts, resultinnd income oand indirect San Marcos ad:

onal income

enue

tax revenmillion

al hnical Report

rom off‐uted to r, freight aviation

verage of

e earned orted by

enerated hotels, local

reational

arned by revenue ff‐airport

nues of

effects of ng from over and impacts, area. In

ues of


8

CONSTRUC

Economic construction Airport in 200

• $7.6 m

• 121 jomillionmillion

TOTAL IMP

The total ecoMcClellan‐Pa

• 2,684 j

• $97.79

• $359.1

Economic Im

Driven by OnDriven by OffDriven by OffDriven by CaTotal Direct, Source: KimlNote: Total

Indu$47

P

CTION IMPA

impacts fractivities

08 included:

million in capit

obs generatn in personan in revenue

PACTS

onomic impaalomar Airpo

jobs

9 million in pe

14 million in r

Total

mpact

n‐Airport Activf‐Airport Visitf‐Airport Locapital ImproveIndirect, andley‐Horn and Als may not add

uced, 7.48

Personal Inco

ACTS

rom capitaat McClell

tal projects co

ed resultingal income a

acts associatert in 2008 inc

ersonal incom

revenues

Economic Im

vities tor Spending al Purchases ement Projectd Induced ImpAssociates, Inc.d up due to roun

Direct, $21.96

Indirect,$23.34

me (millions)

al project an‐Palomar

ompleted

g in $5.01 and $15.60

ed with the cluded:

me

mpacts of M

Em

ts pacts analysis 2008nding.

,

)

•

CONC

EconoPalomlocal c

•

•

•

•

McClellanPa

mployment

1,176 1,306 80 121 2,684

8

Economic V

State and approximate

CLUSIONS

omic contribmar Airport acommunity.

Employmentincreased 21

Personal inc$33.4 million

Business rev$108.6 millio

State and l476.0% from

alomar Airpo

Inc

$54,1$34,7$3,88$5,01$97,7

Induced$165.1

Rev

Vitality Anal

local taxely $21.42 mi

butions of are a vital cBetween 199

t attributed to1.3% from 1,

come increasn to $97.79 m

venues increaon to $359.14

local tax re $4.5 million

ort in 2008

come

180,000 720,000 80,000 10,000 790,000

Direc$116.

Indire$61.7

d, 16

venue (millio

lysis 200

x revenuesllion

the McClomponent o94 and 2008:

o Airport act270 to 2,684

sed 292.8% illion

ased 330.7% 4 million

venues increto $21.42 mi

Revenue

$212,590,0$118,190,0$12,760,0$15,600,0$359,140,0

ct, .62

ct, 76

ons)

8

s of

ellan‐of the

ivities

from

from

eased llion

es

000 000 000 000 000

2008

1.1 Intr

The primathe overPalomar metropolcalendar yAirport wmeasuresTax reveimpacts wcomparesimpacts wreport confor futureAirport.

The repoSignificanAviation defines dimpacts a

Direct imactivities airport mother te

Aerial

8 Econom

roduction

ary purpose orall economAirport (C

itan area anyear 2008. Twere quantifies; direct, indinue and cawere also evs McClellan‐Pwith those of ncludes with e growth in th

ort entitled nce of Airport

Administratdirect, indirecs follows:

mpacts are ccarried out

management, nants with

l View of McC

mic Vitality A

SECT

of this reportmic impact CRQ) on nd San Dieghe economic ed in terms irect, and indapital projecvaluated. ThPalomar Airpoother similara brief look ahe economic i

Estimating ts, published tion (Septect, and indu

consequencesat the airpofixed base oa direct in

ClellanPalom

Analysis

TION 1 – S

t is to quantiof McClellathe Carlsbago County fimpacts of thof three basduced activitct expendituhe report alsort’s economr airports. That the potentiimpacts for th

the Regionby the Federember 1992uced econom

s of economort by airlineoperators, annvolvement

mar Airport

STUDY BA

ify n‐ad or he sic ty. re so

mic he ial he

nal ral 2), mic

mic es, nd in

aviproairareimimairnot

Indecoairby estbuprocapimrephav

Inddirincabocreexaby bectheroubecsucinc

In oncomInd

ACKGROU

iation. Empoduced goodsport construe examples opacts. The pact is that itport economt have occurr

direct impaconomic activport. These atravel agenctablishments.sinesses, emoduced goodpital expansiopacts, indirepresent econve occurred i

duced impactrect and indcreases in emove the comeated by sucample, most airport em

comes incomeir employeeund incomescome incomeccessive rouncome is create

general, dire‐airport actimponent ordirect impact

UND

ploying labors and serviceuction and cof activities distinguishingt is an immedmic activity (red in the abs

ts derive prvities that areactivities inclucies, hotels, r. These entmploy labods and servon and improect impacts nomic activitn the absence

ts are the mudirect impacmployment anbined direct cessive rounof the take‐hmployees is me to other es. Then pas are also spe to another nds of spended.

ect impacts aivities and r multiplier ts are drive

FinTech

9

r, purchasings, and contracapital improthat generatg feature of diate conseqactivities thasence of the a

rimarily frome attributablude services estaurants, aterprises, liker, purchasevices, and iovements. Lishould theoties that woe of the airpo

ultiplier effects. These nd incomes oand indirect ds of spendihome incomespent loca

business ownart of these pent locally aset of individding occur, a

are driven diinclude an effect com

en primarily

al hnical Report

g locally‐acting for ovements te direct a direct uence of at would airport).

m off‐site e to the provided and retail e airport locally nvest in ke direct oretically ould not ort.

cts of the are the over and impacts, ing. For e earned ally and ners and second‐

and thus duals. As dditional

rectly by induced

mponent. by off‐


10

airport spendresult of oactivities. Thalso have an

Indirect impgoods and sethose businsupplies andbusinesses insold by airpofor offices, reAirport; hotinsurance, leservices for impacts also

1.2 MethoAnalys

The first stewas to identian overall strupon which collected ovethrough seveinclusive natwere made topportunity t

Initially, a wgather data and user groincluded:

• On‐airptenant

• Off‐airrelated

• Air pataxi, passen

ding from visr indirectly hese visitor spinduced com

pacts also inervices from onesses locatd services pnclude: wholeort stores; fuestaurants, atel/motel inegal and accairport busiinclude an in

odology for tsis

ep in the Ecoify data requirategy for obto base th

er an extenderal different ure of the efo provide all to provide inp

web‐based sufrom a wide oups. The g

port busines;

port businesd to airport ac

ssengers inccorporate ngers.

itors. This sprelated to

pending indirmponent.

nclude the poff‐airport buted on‐airpoprovided by esale merchaurniture and nd stores locndustry; andcounting, annesses. Theduced compo

the Econom

onomic Vitalirements andbtaining the rehe analysis. ded period omeans to mffort. Significairport tenanput.

rvey was corange of airgroups surve

esses, emplo

sses and orctivities; and

cluding command genera

pending is a on‐airport

rect impacts

purchase of usinesses by ort. These off‐airport

andise to be equipment

cated at the d banking, d technical ese indirect onent.

mic Vitality

ity Analysis d to develop eliable data Data was of time and aximize the cant efforts nts with the

onducted to port tenant eyed online

oyers and

rganizations

mercial, air al aviation

The whardcomanagfollowand VData suppleas theDepar

The daand uinduceairpor

Tax imwere by theServicstate t

Impacairpordirect revenconduairpor

A

Economic V

web‐based suopy surveygement, andw up with FBOVisitors Bureaobtained fremented withe US Departmrtment of Lab

ata gathered used to deed economic rt activities.

mpacts generalso estimatee County of Sae Center. Ttax impacts a

cts associatedrt were also

employmeues were ducted as welrt manageme

Aircraft Main

Vitality Anal

urvey was suys, researcd then e‐maOs and the Caau to collectrom the suh data from oment of Commbor.

from the surtermine direimpacts for o

rated by actived using infoan Diego andThese taxes nd federal av

d with capitaidentified anent, persondetermined ll as informant.

ntenance Act

lysis 200

upplementedch by aail and teleprlsbad Convet additional urveys wereother sourcesmerce and th

rveys was anaect, indirecton‐airport an

vity at the Aormation prod the Californinclude locaviation taxes.

al projects and compiled. al income from the sation provide

ivities (CRQ)

8

with irport phone ention data. also

s such he US

alyzed and d off‐

irport ovided ia Tax l and

at the The and

urvey ed by

2008

The aforeto providimpact of

The currewere alsostudy preEconomicwas also airports.

Future yewas anascenariosactivity wspecified assumes treliever towould likeof comme

1.3 McCOve

McClellanof Carlsbaoperated Federal Arecent insApril 11

8 Econom

ementioned imde an estimaf McClellan‐Pa

ent economo compared epared by Coc activity at compared to

ear 2030 econalyzed unde. The first scewould continin the FAAsthat the Airpo San Diego ely cause an ercial passeng

ClellanPaloerview

n‐Palomar Airad, Californiaby San DiegoAviation Admspection repo1, 2007,

North Side

mic Vitality A

mpacts were ate of the talomar Airpo

ic impacts oto the prevoffman AssocMcClellan‐Pao that of five

nomic activityr two diffenario assumnue to grows TAF. The oport will be dInternationalincrease in thger operation

omar Airpor

rport is locat. The Airporto County. Acministration’sort (FAA Formthe airpor

GA Apron (C

Analysis

added in ordotal economrt.

of the Airpoious economciates in 199alomar Airpoe other simil

y at the airpoerent growt

mes that airpow at the raother scenardesignated asl Airport whiche growth rans.

rt Activity

ted in the Cit is owned anccording to ths (FAA) mom 5010) datert’s proper

RQ)

er mic

ort mic 95. ort ar

ort th ort te rio a ch te

ty nd he ost ed rty

encho

ExhexisoufeeconcouturacctanairThe(HIfor

Coby andGreSoubasproandfacconfacproair

Opcon177miForcomgroyearempe

compasses ame to over 35

hibit 1.1 depisting Runwuthwest, haset and a widnstructed of urse surfacerbojet opercommodate ndem wheel acraft and 60,e runway hasIRL) system ar Runway 24.

mmercial air United Exprd air taxi opeat Circle Avurce Inc. These operators ovide serviced maintenacilities at Mnventional hcilities such aovided by thport tenants.

perational acnsisted of 7,403 generalitary operatrecast (TAF)mmercial andow to 19,940ar 2025. Milimain at currriod.

approximatel54 based airc

picts the Airay 6‐24, o a length of dth of 150 feasphalt and from end to rations. up to 110

aircraft, 80,00,000 pounds s a High Intenand precision

service to thress and othperators incluiation, Schubere are also (FBO) locates such as aircnce. ExistcClellan‐Palohangars, T‐has tie‐downs.e FBOs, the .

ctivity at th14,288 comal aviation otions. The for the Ad general avi and 199,315itary operatiorent levels t

FinTech

1

y 466 acrescraft.

port’s facilitiriented nortapproximateeet. Runwayhas a porousend for wet The runw0,000 poun00 pounds dusingle wheelnsity Runwayinstrument m

he airport is her chartereduding Vision bach Aviationfour full served at the airpcraft fueling, ing aircraft mar Airporthangars, and. These faciCounty, and

he Airport mmercial opoperations anFAA’s TermiAirport projeiation operat5, respectivelons are anticihroughout th

al hnical Report

1

s and is

es. The theast ‐ ely 4,897 y 6‐24 is s friction weather ay can ds dual ual wheel l aircraft. y Lighting markings

provided d airlines Airlines, , and Jet vice fixed port that storage, storage

include d apron lities are d various

in 2008 erations, nd 1,616 nal Area ects that tions will y, by the ipated to he same


12

Source

: www.airnav

Exh

Airpor

v.com

hibit 1.1

rt Facilities

Economic V

Vitality Anallysis 200

8

2008

1.4 Reg

The econoccur witcontext oregion. within theamount o

Growth tNorth Couand San Da broad setting th

Operationconsisted aviation, FAA’s Teprojects toperationrespectiveoperationlevels thro

1.4.1 CW

Over the City of Caof which continuoupopulatioincome Associatio

Table 1.populatioNorth CoCity reprethe Northfrom 2000Carlsbad

8 Econom

gional Socio

omic impactsthin and areof socioeconoSocioeconome region havof economic a

rends withinunty West MDiego Countyperspective at the Airpor

nal activity of 14,288 coand 1,616 rminal Area that commens will growely by thens are anticipoughout the s

ity of CarlsbWest MSA

past seven yrlsbad and ththe city is

us growth. on, employmedata publison of Governm

.1 presents on growth in tunty West Mesented 21 peh County We0 to 2007, thand North Co

mic Vitality A

oeconomic T

s generated influenced omic conditiomic conditione a direct infactivity at the

n the City ofMajor Statisticy were reviewof the ovet operates wi

at the Airommercial, 17military opeForecast fo

ercial and gew to 19,940 e year 202pated to remsame period.

bad and Nor

years the ecohe North Coua part, hav This is

ent, and medhed by thements (SAND

historical the City of CaMSA. In the yercent of thest MSA. Dure populationounty West M

Analysis

Trends

by the Airpoby the overaons within thns and trendfluence on thAirport.

f Carlsbad, thcal Area (MSAwed to providerall economithin.

port in 20077,403 genererations. Thor the Airpoeneral aviatioand 199,31

25. Militamain at curre

rth County

onomies of thnty West MSe experienceevident frodian househoe San DiegAG).

and forecaarlsbad and thyear 2000, the population ring the perios of the City MSA increase

ort all he ds he

he A), de mic

08 ral he ort on 15, ry nt

he A, ed m old go

ast he he of od of ed

at(AAresCaof t

SACitconTheat and203CoAAfro

HisCapregenthefroCitatres

In Caof t

average anACGR) of 3spectively. rlsbad was ethe populatio

NDAG anticipy of Carlsbadntinue to ince population an AACGR od at an AAC30. Similarlunty West MACGR of 0.6 om 2020 to 20

storical levelsrlsbad and esented in Tanerated 30 pe North Counom 2000 to 20y of CarlsbadAACGRs of

spectively.

2007, emplorlsbad was ethe total emp

Origina

nual compo3.8 percent By the yeastimated to on of the Nor

pates that thd and North Crease over thof the City is

of 0.8 percenCGR of 0.6 ply, the popuMSA is projecpercent from030.

s of employmNorth Coun

able 1.2. In thercent of thenty West MSA007, employmd and the Nor

1.7 percen

oyment genestimated to ployment in t

l Terminal B

F inTech

1

unded growand 1.9

r 2007, the represent 24th County We

he populatioCounty West he next two projected tot from 2010 ercent from ulation of thted to incream 2010 to 2

ment within thnty West Mhe year 2000,e total emploA. During thment increaserth County Wnt and 0.5

erated in therepresent 33he North Cou

uilding (CRQ

al hnical Report

3

wth rates percent, City of

4 percent est MSA.

n of the MSA will decades. increase to 2020 2020 to

he North ase at an 2020 and

he City of MSA are , the City yment in he period ed in the

West MSA percent,

e City of 3 percent unty

Q)


14

.

Yea

Historical1

200200200

Forecast1 201202203

AACGR2 2000 to 2010 to 2020 to

Source: 1 2

Yea

Historical1

200200200

Forecast1 201202203

AACGR2 2000 to 2010 to 2020 to

Source: 1 2

Histo

ar 1 00 04 07

0 0 0

2007 2020 2030 1. SANDAG Dat2. Kimley‐Horn

Histor

ar 1 00 04 07

0 0 0


orical and Fo

City of Carls

78,247 92,695 101,337

109,611119,095127,046

3.8% 0.8% 0.6%

ta Warehouse and Associate

rical and For

City of Carls

50,787 54,347 57,1592

59,970 68,690 78,784

1.7% 1.4% 1.4%


Ta

orecast Popu

sbad

7

1 5 6

‐ www.sandages, Inc. analysis

Ta

recast Empl

sbad

2

www.sandag.oes, Inc. analysis

able 1.1

ulation Grow

North Count

364,396,416,

434,460,489,

1.90.60.6

g.org s 2008

able 1.2

loyment Gro

North Count

168,166,174,

181,202,230,

0.51.11.3

org s 2008

Economic V

wth – City o

ty West MSA

,157 ,184 ,225

,539 ,035 ,859

9% 6% 6%

owth – City o

ty West MSA

,764 ,922 ,269

,615 ,478 ,103

5% 1% 3%

Vitality Anal

f Carlsbad

City Pe

of Carlsbad

City Pe

lysis 200

ercent of MSA

21% 23% 24%

25% 26% 26%

ercent of MSA

30% 33% 33%

33% 34% 34%

8

A

A

2008

West Memploymcomparedof a greatto genera

SANDAG fCity of Cawill continEmployman AACGRfrom 202County WAACGR ofan AACGR

Historical (stated inand NortTable 1.3income, mearn less median va

Y

Histori222

Foreca222

AACGR200020102020

Source:

8 Econom

MSA. The ent in the d to its relatiter ability of te jobs.

forecasts thaarlsbad and thnue to grow ent in the CitR of 1.4 perce20 to 2030. West MSA is af 1.1 percentR of 1.3 perce

and forecastn 1999 dollarh County W. Median incmeans that oand the othealue. Median

Historical

Year

cal1 2000 2004 2007 st1 2010 2020 2030 R2 0 to 2007 0 to 2020 0 to 2030

1. SANDAG 2. Kimley‐H

mic Vitality A

greater pCity of Cave populatiobusinesses w

t employmenhe North Couover the nexty is projectedent from 201Employmentnticipated tot from 2010 tent from 2020

t median hours) for the Ci

West MSA areome, in controne half of er half earn n household i

and Foreca

City of C

$65,8$72,$72,

$76,$83,8$90,

1.30.80.8

Data WarehouHorn and Assoc

Analysis

proportion arlsbad, when, is indicativwithin the Ci

nt within in thunty West MSt two decaded to increase 10 to 2020 ant in the Nort increase at ato 2020 and 0 to 2030.

usehold incomity of Carlsbae presented rast to averagall householdmore than thncome is ofte

ast Median H

arlsbad

854 580 195

562 845 646

3% 8% 8% use www.sandiates, Inc. anal

of en ve ty

he SA es. at nd th an at

me ad in ge ds he en

conhobechigareinctheCo

Duan hoCorelthadecto in meCo

Table 1.3

Household In

North Co

$$$

$$$

dag.org lysis 2008

nsidered a beusehold thacause it is nogh or low eaea. In the ycome in the e median hunty West M

ring the perioverall 1.3 usehold incounty West ated to the at commencecline in med2007. In 200the City wa

edian househunty West M

ncome Grow

unty West M

$53,920 $59,387 $59,094

$62,425 $67,641 $73,106

1.3% 0.8% 0.8%

etter indicatoan average ot unduly infarning houseyear 2000, thCity was 22 ousehold inSA as a whole

od from 200percent incr

ome for bothMSA. The subprime moed in 2006 is ian househol07, the mediaas 22 percehold income SA.

wth – City of

MSA City

F inTech

1

or of the earnhousehold

fluenced by uholds in a phe median hopercent greacome in the.

00 to 2007, threase in theh the City aneconomic dortgage markreflected in tld income froan householdnt greater tin the overa

f Carlsbad

y Percent of M

122% 122% 122%

123% 124% 124%

al hnical Report

5

nings per income

unusually particular ousehold ater than e North

here was e median nd North downturn ket crisis the slight om 2004 d income than the all North

MSA


16

During the pan overall 1household inCounty Wesrelated to ththat commendecline in mto 2007. In in the City wthe overall N

SANDAG fohousehold inWest MSA decades. Meprojected to from 2010 Median housWest MSA israte for these

1.4.2 San

Both populatDiego County

Yea

Historical1

200200200

Forecast1 201202203

AACGR2 2000 to 2010 to 2020 to

Source: 1 2

period from 21.3 percent income for bost MSA. Thhe subprime nced in 2006

median house2007, the mewas 22 perceorth County W

orecasts anncome in thewill increasedian househincrease at ato 2020 andsehold incoms anticipated e time period

Diego Coun

tion and empy show a pos

Historical

ar 1 00 04 07

0 0 0


2000 to 2007increase in toth the City he economicmortgage mis reflected ihold income edian househent greater tWest MSA.

ticipate thae City and Nose over the hold income inan AACGR of d from 2020me in the Noto increase ads.

ty

ployment groitive trend ov

and Foreca

Po

233

333


, there was the median and North

c downturn market crisis in the slight from 2004

hold income han that in

at median orth County next two

n the City is 0.8 percent 0 to 2030. orth County at the same

owth in San ver the past

Ta

st Populatio

opulation

2,813,833 3,013,014 3,098,269

3,245,279 3,635,855 3,984,753

1.4% 1.1% 0.9%

www.sandag.oes, Inc. analysis

seven forecawithinpopulaemplofrom 2grew respecthe Cowas 1,

SANDAemplogrow aCountpercen0.9 pprojeccountyand U

able 1.4

on and Empl

org s 2008

Economic V

years. Tabast population the Countation of the Coyment was 2000 to 2007at AACGRs octively. By thounty was 3,0,511,546.

AG forecasts oyment withiat comparabty is forecastnt from 2010percent fromctions place y in line withnited States (

loyment–Sa

Vitality Anal

ble 1.4 preseon and emty. In the County was 21,384,676. 7, populationof 1.4 percenthe year 2007,098,269 and

anticipate thn the Countyle rates. Thet to grow at 0 to 2020 anm 2020 topopulation

h that of the (US) as a who

an Diego Cou

Employmen

1,384,6761,449,3491,511,546

1,573,7421,741,0331,913,682

1.3% 1.0% 0.9%

lysis 200

ents historicaployment gryear 2000

,813,833 andDuring the pn and employt and 1.3 per, the populatitotal employ

hat populatioy will contine population oan AACGR od at an AACGo 2030. T growth inState of Califole.

unty

nt

6 9 6

2 3 2

8

al and rowth , the d total period yment rcent, ion of yment

n and ue to of the of 1.1 GR of These n the fornia

2008

The StatePopulatioCounties 2populatio1.2 perceof 1.1 pethe US CUnited St0.8 perce2030.

SANDAG fthe Countfrom 201percent fCaliforniaprojects Californiafrom 2006

1.5 Cur

The last fithe airlineThe SeptTrade Cenof the enation’s

Low

8 Econom

of Californian Projection2000‐2050, Jon of Californnt from 2010rcent from 2Census Bureaates is forecant from 2010

forecasts antty will grow a10 to 2020 rom 2020 to Employmentthat emplo will grow at6 to 2016.

rrent Econo

ive to seven yes and the aember 11, 2nter crippled economy byappetite for

wer Level Ter

mic Vitality A

, Departmentns for Califouly 2007, foreia will grow a0 to 2020 and020 to 2030.au, the popuast to grow a0 to 2020 and

ticipate that eat an AACGR and at an A 2030. Comt Developmeoyment in t an AACGR

mic Environ

years have beviation indus2001 attack an already sty sharply dair travel.

rminal Parki

Analysis

t of Finance, ornia and Iecasts that that an AACGR d at an AACG. According tulation of that an AACGR d from 2020 t

employment of 1.0 perceAACGR of 0paratively, thnt Departmethe State of 1.4 perce

nment

een difficult fstry in generaon the Worruggling sectecreasing th The ensuin

ng (CRQ)

in Its he of GR to he of to

in nt 0.9 he nt of nt

or al. rld or he ng

recby reb

Todoil methecosnewdiffbeeind

Theconthiaviind

1.5

A ind199100proondectheairBestuecoairin a

EnaActtheyeamathe

cession has flimiting any

bound.

day the indusprices, addeeasures, an ine market, asts in the gew set of conficult to do ben one of dustries.

e following nditions press report aniation indusdustry’s perfo

5.1 Genera

pronounced dustry began 90s. This de0,000 manufaoduction fromly 928 aircracline in genee increasing craft manufnefits that coudent pilot onomy. Prodcraft accidenaircraft manu

actment of tt (GARA) of 1e aviation indar Statute of anufactures oeir compone

further compy possibility

stry must cond costs for enflux of low‐nd increasineneral aviationstraints hasbusiness in wthe world’

is an overviesent at the tid a brief dstry and isormance.

al Aviation O

decline in in 1978, and

ecline resulteacturing jobs m about 18,00aft in 1994. ral aviation dnumber of lifacturers, thovered many training, anduct liability nts resulted iufacturing cos

he General A1994 providedustry. This ARepose on l

of all generalents where

F inTech

1

pounded the of a quick a

ntend with fluver changing‐cost airlines ng liability inon marketpla made it evwhat has trads most com

ew of the eime of the wdiscussion absues affecti

Outlook

the general d lasted into ed in the lossand a drop in00 aircraft an Contributinduring this peiability claimse loss of Vcosts associand the recelawsuits arisin dramatic ists.

Aviation Revited significant Act establisheiability relate aviation aircno time li

a l hnical Report

7

problem air travel

uctuating g security entering nsurance ce. This en more ditionally mpetitive

economic writing of bout the ng that

aviation the mid‐s of over n aircraft nnually to g to the eriod was s against Veterans ated with essionary sing from ncreases

talization relief to

ed an 18‐ed to the craft and mit was


18

previously ethe Act has hare reflected1994, statistaviation activaviation airshipments of

As a result o11, 2001, siggeneral aviacountry. WitD.C. area, mbeen lifted. aviation havresulting froaviation aircpart to incmeasures bservice airpo

Business aviafacets of gindividuals ubusinesses ef“business” aused interchaircraft usedThe FAA defaircraft (notindividual fobusiness in wFAA estimatslightly moractivity.

The FAA defiuse of an airother organizfor the purpand/or proppilots for th

FB

stablished. had on the gd in recent ntics indicate vity, an increarcraft fleet, f fixed‐wing g

of the terrorignificant restation flying th the exceptmost of these

Business ve experienceom the addraft for travereasingly timbeing implemrts.

ation is one general aviatse aircraft asfficiency and and “corporahangeably, ad to supportfines businesst for compenor transportwhich the indtes that buse than 11

nes corporatrcraft by a czation (not foposes of tranperty, and he operation

BO Fli h Pl

Some positigeneral aviatiational statisan increase ase in the actand an i

general aviatio

st attacks of rictions werein many aretion of the We restrictionsand corporaed some poitional use el. This trenme consuminmented at

of the fastetion. Comps a tool to improductivity.ate” aircraft as they bott a business s use as “anynsation or hation requirividual is engsiness aircrapercent of a

e transportatorporation, cor compensatnsporting its employing pn of the airc

i F ili i

ive impacts on industry stics. Since in general

tive general ncrease in on aircraft.

September e placed on eas of the Washington, s have now ate general sitive gains of general

nd is tied in ng security commercial

est growing panies and mprove their . The terms are often

h refer to enterprise. y use of an hire) by an ed by the gaged.” The aft conduct all aviation

tion as “any company or tion or hire) employees

professional craft.” An

additioaviatioRegardcompoexperi

Increamost aircrafaircrafItineraaircrafschedprovid

•

•

•

•

•

Many aviatioAircraAviatioapprobusine92 of t

Economic V

onal 12 peron activity dless of the tonent of geneienced signifi

ased personnimportant

ft. Companft for businesaries can be ft can fly intuled airlinesdes the follow

Employee tim

Increased en

Minimized ti

Enhanced ind

Managemen

of the nationon are memft Associationon Fact Bximately 75 esses operatethe Fortune 1

FBO Flight

Vitality Anal

rcent of theis consid

terminology ueral aviation cant recent g

nel productivbenefits ofies flying ss have contchanged as to destinatios. Busineswing:

me savings

route produ

me away from

dustrial secur

t control ove

n's employerbers of the n (NBAA). ThBook 2004 percent of

e general avi100 companie

Planning Fac

lysis 200

nation’s gedered corpoused, the bususe is one thagrowth.

vity is one of using busgeneral avrol of their tneeded, an

ons not servess aircraft

ctivity

m home

rity

r scheduling

s who use geNational Buse NBAA’s Busindicates all Fortune

iation aircrafes operate ge

cility (CRQ)

8

eneral orate. siness at has

of the siness iation travel. d the ed by usage

eneral siness siness that

e 500 ft and eneral

2008

aviation aaircraft rarentals tsupportedmechanic

General atransport Businesselink multiand potensmaller ccharteringagreemencontracts

Other neaircraft flelight jets jets, suchACJ, whpassengeairlines. category and Cessnsmall jetscost subsaircraft. Tjets”.

VLJ aircrathe cost Certified bhas a pmillion anwith orde

Business additionaBusiness than 14,0$233 billi2017, exc

8 Econom

aircraft. Businanges from sto multiple d by dediccs.

aviation aircrapersonnel

es often use iple office lontial customecompanies hg, leasing, nts, partnerhave emerge

ew, growing eet mix inclu(VLJs). Busineh as the Boeihich are rr aircraft floVery light of aircraft thna Mustang (s, seating lesstantially lessThey have b

ft represent aof previou

by the FAA inurchase pricnd has expeers for more t

aviation is l growth in tAviation Ou

000 new businon will be deluding busine

mic Vitality A

ness use of gsmall, single‐aircraft corcated flight

aft use allowsand carg

general aviatocations and ers. Business has escalatetime‐sharingrships, and ed.

segments ofde business ess liners are ng Business econfigured own by largjets are a

hat includes t(among othes than 10 pas than typicabeen labeled

a significant dusly availablen June 2006, tce of approrienced signihan 2,500 air

projected tthe future. Tutlook projecness aircraft elivered betwess liners and

Analysis

eneral aviatioengine aircrarporate fleet crews an

s employers tgo efficientltion aircraft treach existinaircraft use bed as variog, interchang

manageme

f the busineliners and velarge busineJet and Airbversions

ge commercirelatively nethe Eclipse 50rs). These aassengers, thal business jd as “person

departure froe jet aircrafthe Eclipse 50oximately $1ificant interercraft to date

to experiencThe Honeywects that movalued at ov

ween 2007 an very light jet

on aft ets nd

to ly. to ng by us ge nt

ess ry ess us of ial ew 00 re at et nal

m ft. 00 1.6 est .

ce ell re er nd ts.

ThecornatsigMcyea

1.5

Theindthi

DeestgrotraGlotracar

BoandSoustaNodecmatraave

e anticipatedrporate aircrtion’s active nificantly imcClellan‐Palomars.

5.2 Airline

e following dustry, as it exs report.

emand ‐ Boeitimates thatowth will aveaffic growth wobal Market Faffic growth wrgo traffic gro

th forecasts d freight grouth America ates that “beorth America cline from 2arkets grow favel growth erage 4.5% a

Commerc

d increased raft and ovegeneral avia

mpact aviatimar Airport

Industry Out

is a brief rxisted at the

ng’s most ret worldwideerage 5.2% pwill average 6Forecast estimwill average 5owth will aver

anticipate thwth to occurand Europe

ecause of itsmarket share24% to 20%aster.” Boeinfor North Aannually” at

cial Air Servic

F inTech

1

use of businerall changesation fleet is ion activity over the ne

look

eview of thtime of the w

cent 20‐year e passengerer year and 6.2% per yearmates that p5.3% per yearage 5.9% per

he bulk of pr in Asia, folle. Boeing’s s maturity the of world tr% as less deng estimates merican carrleast throug

ce Activity (CR

al hnical Report

9

ness and s in the likely to at the

xt 10‐20

e airline writing of

forecast r traffic air cargo . Airbus’ assenger r and air r year.

assenger owed by forecast he intra‐raffic will eveloped that “air riers will gh 2023,

RQ)


20

while Airbupassenger trsame period.cargo will inc

Competitionpressures, mindustry to foreseeable will continuinefficient stroubles havenergy coststerm relief bankruptcy pcompete in Newer low‐cthe “legacy”

The primary and future cdrivers for present possthat any gathrough strconcessions, could quickcompetitive room for thecosts.

GA Apr

us estimatesraffic will inc. Airbus estimcrease by 4.2%

‐ Due to higmost analyscontinue to future. Trade to strugglstructures ave only been. Though sothrough la

protection, ththe long‐ter

cost carriers wcarriers on do

concern for acost of fuel, the aviationsibility of higains that airructural chaor the recenkly evaporapricing in the absorption

ron Construct

s that domrease by 3.2mates that do% per year.

gh costs and csts expect perform weitional netwole with highand high dn made worome have reaabor concesheir ability torm remains awill continue omestic flight

all airlines is one of the bn industry. gh energy corlines may hanges, thront downturn iate. The e industry haof these hig

tion Activity

mestic U.S. % over the omestic U.S.

competitive the airline akly in the ork carriers h cost and debt. Their rse by high alized short‐ssions and o profitably a question. to squeeze t fares.

the current biggest cost The ever osts means have made ough labor n oil prices, extremely

as left little ghly volatile

(CRQ)

Legacymarkecarrielow‐coconsisthe prare bwhile structis notrevealprodugreateprofita

David entitleCost Cresourefficieinto ohumaolder rules Low‐ccontrarules”labor,

Low

Economic V

y Carriers vet is currenrs and low‐cost carriers sestently. On thrimary reasonburdened wit

low‐cost ures. While t universal. Als that othctivity and eer impact ability.

Eil of Globaed Legacy AiCompetitors,rces, both huently than legold modes on capital utunion contrathat lower ost carriers acts that all that allow fresulting in

wer Level Park

Vitality Anal

vs. Low‐Costntly divided cost carriers. eem to be abhe surface it wn for this is tth expensivecarriers hathis is true inA deeper looher factors fficient asseton cost

al Insight starlines Could “Low‐cost uman and magacy airlines, of productiotilization, legcts suffer froproductivity have been low for “mofor “greater cmuch impro

king Pedestri

lysis 200

t Carriers ‐between l Of the twole to make a would appeahat legacy cae union conve lower n many instanok at the indsuch as

t utilization hstructures

ates in his rLearn from carriers use aterial, much which are lon.” In termgacy carriers om restrictive by idling boable to negoore flexible cross‐utilizatioved producti

ian Bridge (C

8

‐ The egacy o, the profit r that arriers tracts wage nces it dustry labor

have a and

report Low‐their more ocked ms of with work odies. otiate work on of ivity.”

CRQ)

2008

With regcarriers rwhich idlepoint‐to‐pcarriers. aircraft fowhile legaper day.”

The procontracts of the hustructuralviability osecure wawill do competiticarriers mhub‐and‐sfixed costthem wed

At an airelies heaspoke netcontinuedprovide services.

8 Econom

ard to capitely heavily oe aircraft (andpoint system“In 2002 Jetor an averagacy carriers s

ductivity drand the ineffb‐and‐ spokel problem thof legacy caage concessiolittle to

ve position may not be abspoke systemts in real estadded to this s

rport such aavily on contwork of thed success of opportunity

mic Vitality A

al asset utilon hub‐and‐sd personnel) ms employedtBlue operatege of 12.9 hstruggled to r

rags of resficiencies in ae system comat threatens rriers. Currons out of theimprove thof these able to move m because ate at their hystem.”

as McClellannnectivity to e major legacthe low‐cosfor new

Analysis

ization, legaspoke systemmore than thd by low‐coed each of ihours per dareach 10 hou

strictive labasset utilizatiombine to formthe long‐ter

rent efforts teir work forche long‐terirlines. Legaaway from thof the “hughubs that kee

n‐Palomar ththe hub‐an

cy carriers, tht carriers maor enhance

cy ms, he ost its ay, urs

or on m a rm to es rm cy he ge ep

at d‐he ay ed

F inTech

2

al hnical Report

1


22

THIS PAAGE INTE

ENTIONAL

Economic V

LLY LEFT

Vitality Anal

BLANK

lysis 200

8

2008

2.1 Dir

The Airporelated governmeterminal amanagemand aircservices, the analyairport mtenants, 4Palomar A20 emplofull‐time jobs. Treatime joapproxim

2.2 Dir

The persoemployed$21,960,0income ofrom tenareported

G

Full Tim

8 Econom

SECTION

rect Employm

ort supports jobs in traent servicesand airfield o

ment and buiraft supportand ground ysis of data management, 404 people wAirport in 200oyers in Carls(FT) jobs anating each pab, results ately 360 full

rect Income

onal income d at the Airp000 in 2008of on‐airport ant survey dby the U.S.

Non‐GovFT,

71.3%

Gov F6.7%

Gov PT, 3.9%

me vs Part Time

mic Vitality A

N 2 – DIRE

ment

a wide varieansportation,s. These operations, silding maintet services, transportatioobtained froon‐airport bere employed08 making it sbad. Of thnd 89 were art‐time job ain an e

‐time equiva

earned by port was est8. The anemployees wata and comDepartment

v

FT, %

e Employtmen

Analysis

ECT AND AIRPO

ety of aviatio, retail, anjobs includecurity, facilienance, airlinconcessionaion. Based oom surveys usinesses, and at McClellaone of the toese, 315 wepart‐time (Pas half of a fuestimation lent (FTE) job

these worketimated to bnual personwas estimate

mpared to daof Commerc

Non‐Gov PT,

18.1%

nt Breakdown

INDIRECTORT ACTI

n‐nd e: ty ne re on of nd n‐op re PT) ull‐of bs.

ers be nal ed ta ce

BuDiepayof frodat

2.3

Thebu$1buexpfroairwewo

2.4

Appasare

T ECONOMIVITY

reau of Econego‐Carlsbad‐yroll data, cothe FTE em

om the variota collection e

3 Direct Re

e total revsinesses in 16,620,000. siness salependitures. om airport mport businessere based on orker at the A

4 Indirect Spending

proximately ssengers arrive visitors. The

Corp

MIC IMPA

nomic Analys‐Santa Marcovering appromployees idenous electroniefforts.

evenues

venue gener2008, was These tot

es and gDirect reve

management ses and tenaaverage rev

Airport.

Impacts g

25 percentving at McCleese visitors in

porate Jet Act

F inTech

2

ACTS OF

sis (BEA) for cos MSA. oximately 90ntified, was ic and pape

rated by os estimated tal revenuesgovernment nues were and surveys

ants. Direct rvenues gener

Due to

t of the tellan‐Palomanclude those

ivity (CRQ)

al hnical Report

3

the San Annual

0 percent obtained r survey

n‐airport to be include budget

obtained s of on‐revenues rated per

Visitor

total air r Airport traveling


24

by commutegeneral aviatthat 68 pertraveling for pleasure or p

The survey average daaverage lengstayed for 4during their vlength of stpublished in San Diego Bureaus.

Off‐airport sgenerated afor hotels, transportatio

2.4.1 IndiGene

The total McClellan‐Pajobs and ge

Business Se

Hotels

Restaurants

Entertainme

Transportat

Total Expen

Sources: Mc Kim

er airline, ation aircraft. rcent of arrbusiness rea

personal reaso

data was aily expenditgth of stay. O4.7 days anvisit. These atay data areother studieNorth Con

spending bybout $61,760restaurants

on and other

rect Emploerated by Vi

spending byalomar Airpoenerated $2

ctors

s/Bars

ent/Other

tion

nditures

cClellan‐Palommley‐Horn and

air taxi, corpThe survey driving passensons and 32 ons.

lso used to tures per vOn average, d spent $27average expee comparablees by the Sannvention an

y visitors in0,000 of buss, retail storecreational

oyment andisitor Spend

y visitors aort supporte23,340,000 o

Off –Airpo

ToS

$2

$14

$1

$6

$6

ar Airport Survd Associates, In

porate and ata showed ngers were percent for

determine visitor and each visitor 73 per day nditure and e to those n Diego and nd Visitors

n the area siness sales ores, local providers.

d Income ding

arriving at d 692 FTE of personal

Ta

rt Impacts R

otal Visitor Spending

22,233,600

4,2040,800

19,145,600

6,176,000

61,760,000

vey, 2008. nc. analysis 200

incomairpordirect spendwhichspent and cbenefaveragwere 2.1 suspend

able 2.1

Related to V

Emplo

$8

$4

$7

$

$2

08

T

Economic V

me in 2008. rt business semploymenting. The p is actual viwere determcompared wits study foge personal ialso developummarizes ting broken d

Visitor Spend

yment Incom

8,240,000

4,970,000

7,660,000

2,470,000

23,340,000

Hot36%

Trans 10%

Visitor

Vitality Anal

Data collectsurveys was t and incomepercentage ositor spendinmined for eawith the prr the airporncome or eaped by indushe indirect iown by busin

ding

me Em

tel %

F2

Retail 15%

Spending Brea

lysis 200

ted from theused to calce related to vof business ng, to the pch industry srevious econrt. Similarlyarnings per wstry sector. impacts of vness sector.

mployment

262

220

159

51

692

ood 23%

Entertain16%

akdown

8

e off‐culate visitor sales, ayroll sector nomic y, the worker Table visitor

2008

2.5 SumImp

Table 2.2 airport acon the are

Economi

Direct Im(driven b

Indirect (driven b

Total Dir

Source: MKi

8 Econom

mmary of Dipacts

summarizes ctivities and tea. The total

ic Impact

mpacts by on‐airport

Impacts by off‐airport

rect and Indir

McClellan‐Palomimley‐Horn and

mic Vitality A

irect and Ind

the direct imthose from vl direct and v

Summar

activities)

visitor spend

rect Impacts

mar Airport Surd Associates, In

Analysis

direct

mpacts from oisitor spendinvisitor spendin

ry of Direct a

Emp

ding)

rvey. nc. analysis 20

n‐ng ng

imFTEandincexp

Table 2.2

and Indirect

ployment

360

692

1,052

008

pacts of McCE local jobs, d $178,380,0cludes businependitures.

t Economic I

Income

$21,960,00

$23,340,00

$45,300,00

Clellan‐Palom$45,300,000000 in business sales and

Impacts

00 $

00

00 $

F inTech

2

mar Airport a0 in personal ness revenued government

Revenues

$116,620,000

$61,760,000

$178,380,000

al hnical Report

5

are 1052 income,

es which t budget

0

0


26

THIS PAAGE INTEN

NTIONALL

Economic V

LY LEFT B

Vitality Anal

BLANK

lysis 200

8

2008

SE

3.1 Othand

The previdue to vimpacts igenerate local ecorevenues economicimpacts ithat proaviation‐r

Business athe airpogoods amaintenarental carwholesalestores; frestauranand bankitechnical indirect eanalysis.

8 Econom

ECTION 3

her Indirect d Revenue

ious section visitor spendiidentified in additional in

onomy. Theare referred

c impacts. nclude the sovide supplierelated busine

activities servort also genend services nce for users, tour busese merchandiurniture andnts, and storing, insuranceservices for

economic imp

Premier

mic Vitality A

– OTHER

Employmen

identified ining. The dithe previou

ncome and rese additiona to as indirecOther ind

sales from loes to the esses.

ving arriving verate additio

including: e of off‐airps and public tse to be sod equipmenes located ae, legal and aairport businpacts were in

Jet FBO (CRQ

Analysis

R INDIRECFROM AI

nt, Income,

direct impacrect economus section alsevenues in thal income anct and induceirect revenuocal businesseon‐airport

visitors outsidnal orders ffuelling an

ort taxi cabtransportatioold by airpont for officeat the Airporccounting, annesses. Thesncluded in th

Q)

CT AND INRPORT A

cts mic so he nd ed ue es or

de or nd bs, on; ort es, rt; nd se he

Othact$2,in r

3.2

Indthrembuincloclocrou

Offalspepuautinvwe

ThecalDeAnSysindanainc

NDUCED EACTIVITY

her indirect tivities gene,720,000 in prevenue in 20

2 Induced Revenue

duced econrough the spemployees of sinesses at thcome then spcal economy, cal residents,unds of spend

f‐airport buso generate jrsonal incomrchases suchtomobiles, vestment actere included i

e induced ecculated by partment of alysis (BEA)stem (RIMS dustry classifalysis the relclude:

• Air Tran

• Wholessupplier

• Accomm

• Food Se

ECONOMIC

impacts of erated apprpersonal inco008.

Employmene

omic impaending of peon‐airport

he Airport. Tpend part ofthus produc, and so on ding.

sinesses servjobs and peme was sph as food, houses, setivities. Then the analysis

conomic impapplying thCommerce, Regional InpII) multiplieication. For evant indust

nsportation;

sale trade, forrs;

modation;

ervices;

F inTech

2

C IMPACT

on‐airport roximately 6ome, and $6

nt, Income, a

cts are gersonal incomand aviationThe recipientf that incomcing income fthrough the

ving arrivingrsonal incompent on cclothing, fu

ervices andese induced s.

pacts of Airpohe appropriaBureau of Eput‐Output Mers broken d the purposeries that are

r purchases fr

al hnical Report

7

TS

business 65 jobs, 6,810,000

and

enerated me by the n‐related ts of that me in the for other e various

g visitors me. This onsumer urnishing, d other impacts

ort were ate U.S. Economic Modeling down by e of this involved

rom local


28

• Amu

• Grou

Table 3.1 primpacts of

Economic Im

Driven by O

Driven by O

Driven by LoBusinesses

Total Induce

Source: McCleBEA rKimle

sement and R

und Passenge

resents a suon‐airport b

mpact

n‐airport Act

ff‐Airport Vis

ocal Purchase

ed Impacts

ellan‐Palomar regional multipey‐Horn and As

Recreation; a

r Transportat

ummary of tbusiness act

Summ

ivities

itor Spending

es by On‐airpo

Airport Surveypliers. ssociates, analy

nd

tion.

he induced tivities and

Ta

mary of Indu

g

ort

y.

ysis 2008

activit1,446$158,3

able 3.1

uced Econom

Employme

817

614

16

1,446

Economic V

ties serving arjobs, $44,76350,000 in re

mic Impacts

nt In

$32,

$11,

$1,1

$44,

Vitality Anal

rriving visitor60,000 in persvenue in 200

ncome

220,000

380,000

160,000

,760,000

lysis 200

rs which genesonal income08.

Revenues

$95,970,00

$56,430,00

$5,590,000

$158,350,00

8

erated e, and

s

00

00

0

00

2008

S

4.1 St

McClellanpublic revgeneratedAirport. taxes paiproperty at the Atenants. from air taxes, andtravelers. those indgeneratedsources. Pfrom theestimatescalculatedTax Servigeneratedthat in 20revenue $5,230,00

Jurisdicti

Local

State

Total

Sources:

8 Econom

ECTION 4

tate and Loc

n Palomar Avenues. Stated from the Direct tax rid by on‐airassessmentsAirport, and Indirect tax rtraveler sp

d taxes paid b Induced taduced sales d from the Property tax ae County ofs were based from data oce Center apd by Airport a008, $10,230were attrib

00 was attrib

on

California TaxCounty of SanKimley‐Horn a

mic Vitality A

4 – TAX IM

cal Tax Impa

irport is a ve and local taeconomic arevenues incrport busine of general asales taxes

revenues inclupending, hotby businessesxes were detand incom

initial directassessments f San Diegoed on effectobtained frompplied to peactivities. It 0,000 in statebuted to dirbuted to indi

Estim

RevenuesDirect Act

$8,470,

$1,760,

$10,230

x Service Centen Diego and Associates

Analysis

MPACTS G

acts

vital source x revenues aactivity at thclude propersses, personaviation basefrom airpo

ude sales taxtel occupans that serve atermined frome that wet and indirewere obtaineo. State tative tax ratem the Californersonal incomwas estimatee and local tarect activitieirect activitie

mated 2008 S

s from tivities

,000

,000

0,000

er

s, analysis 2009

GENERATE

of re he rty nal ed ort es cy air m re ect ed ax es nia me ed ax es, es,

andrevpre

It comreveco

Table 4.1

State and Lo

Revenues frIndirect Activ

$5,010,00

$220,000

$5,230,00

9

ED BY AIR

d $5,960,000venues wereesents the res

should be mponent of,venues creatonomic activi

ocal Tax Imp

rom vities

RevInd

00 $

0 $

00 $

We

RPORT AC

0 to induced$21,420,000sults of the an

noted that and not adted by on‐aity calculated

pacts

venues from uced Effects

$2,380,000

$3,580,000

$5,960,000

estern Flight

F inTech

2

CTIVITIES

d effects. T0 in 2008. Tnalysis.

tax revenuedditive to, trport and a for the Airpo

Total Reven

$15,86

$5,560

$21,42

t FBO (CRQ)

al hnical Report

9

S

Total tax Table 4.1

es are a he gross ir visitor ort.

Tax nues

0,000

0,000

0,000


30

THIS P PAGE INT

ENTIONA

Economic V

ALLY LEFT

Vitality Anal

T BLANK

lysis 200

8

2008

The CapMcClellandollars oproposedare compconstruct

• RehRun

• DesMatwes

Economic

Tot

Source: CoBEKi

Ne

8 Econom

SECTIO

ital Improven Palomar Airof business CIP for the posed of coion projects i

habilitation nway 6‐24;

sign and instterials Arrestst end of the

S

c Impact

Direct

Indirect

Induced

tal CIP Impac

ounty of San DEA regional muimley‐Horn and

ew Terminal

mic Vitality A

ON 5 –IMP

ement Progrrport generatrevenues inyears 2009

onsulting, enncluding the

and recon

tallation of ating System (runway;

Summary of

cts

Diego, Airports ultipliers. d Associates, a

Construction

Analysis

PACTS FR

ram (CIP) fted millions n 2008. Ththrough 201

ngineering anfollowing:

nstruction

an Engineere(EMAS) on th

f 2008 Capit

Employ

5

2

4

12

analysis 2009

n (CRQ)

OM AIRPO

or of he 14 nd

of

ed he

•

•

•

5.1

In 52pe$7,pre

5.2

AdDedirindindaddaddinc

TheCIP$5,Tab

Table 5.1

tal Improvem

yment

2

7

2

21

ORT CAPI

• Expansion

• Installatio

• Runway s

1 Direct Im

2008, the Airjobs in the rsonal inco,630,000 in esents the dir

2 Indirect

justment fapartment of rect CIP revenduced effectsduced effectsditional $7,96ditional jobs come.

e total regioP was $15,60,010,000 in ble 6.1.

ment Progra

In

$2,

$1,

$1,

$5,

ITAL PRO

n of the north

on of taxiway

safety area im

mpacts

rport’s CIP gelocal area anme, based business re

rect impacts o

and Induce

actors publiCommerce

nues to estim of the CIP. of the Airpo67,475 in revand paid $2

onal contribu00,000, genepersonal inco

am Impacts

ncome

180,000

110,000

720,000

,010,000

F inTech

3

OJECTS

h apron;

guidance sig

mprovements.

nerated an end paid $2,18

on approevenues. Taof the CIP in 2

d Effects

shed by twere appliedate total, indIn 2008, indi

ort’s CIP genevenues, supp2,829,095 in

ution of the erating 121 jome as pres

Reve

$7,63

$3,12

$4,85

$15,60

al hnical Report

1

ns; and

.

stimated 80,000 in oximately able 5.1 2008.

he U.S. d to the irect and irect and erated an orted 69 personal

Airport’s jobs and ented in

enues

30,000

20,000

50,000

00,000


32

THIS PAGGE INTEN

NTIONALL

Economic V

LY LEFT B

Vitality Anal

BLANK

lysis 200

8

2008

6.1 Com

The findinby CoffmAirport wfindings oin the stmainly reon‐airportand inducand local

Between

• Empincr2,68

• Perfrom

• Busfrom

• Stat476mill

6.2 Com

The findiwere alsorecent ecomparabcompariso

• BraCou

• BobBur

• BowLou

8 Econom

SE

mparison w

ngs of the 199man Associatwere revieweof this study. tudies were elated to diret activities anced economitax impacts w

1994 and 200

ployment attreased 211.384;

sonal incomem $33.4 millio

siness revenum $108.6 mill

te and loca6.0 percent flion.

mparison w

ngs of this o compared teconomic imble airports. Ton were:

dley Internaunty, Windsor

b Hope Airprbank CA

wman Field uisville KY

mic Vitality A

ECTION 6

ith Previous

94 economic tes for McCed and compCommon faccompared.

ect economicnd visitor spenic impacts aswere also com

08:

ributed to Ai3 percent fr

e increased on to $97.8 m

es increased lion to $359.1

al tax revenfrom $4.5 m

ith Other Ai

economic vto the findingmpacts studiThe airports i

ational Airpr Locks CT

port, Los An

Airport, Jeff

Analysis

– COMPA

s Studies

benefits studClellan‐Palompared with thctors evaluate These we

c impacts fronding. Indires well as stampared.

irport activitierom 1,270 t

292.8 percemillion;

330.7 perce1 million; and

ues increaseillion to $21

irports

itality analysgs of the moes from fivincluded in th

port, Hartfo

ngeles Count

ferson Count

ARISON TO

dy ar he ed re om ect te

es to

nt

nt d

ed 1.4

sis ost ve his

rd

ty,

ty,

•

•

Themo

•

•

•

Apdatopemothloc

6.2

EcoAir200Impre

O OTHER

• Ernest ACounty, P

• Willow RuMI

e basis for tore of the foll

• The numb

• The total

• Socioeconpersonal i

ppendix A, preta for these erations, com

mployment onher socioecocal areas.

2.1 Bradle

onomic imparport (BDL) w06 report provements: epared by the

Je

AIRPORT

A. Love FiePrescott AZ

un Airport, W

the comparisowing:

ber of based a

number of ai

nomic factorincome.

esents a comairports inc

mmercial passn‐airport andnomic indica

ey Internatio

act data for was obtained“Bradley InAn Econom

e Connecticut

et Source FBO

F inTech

3

TS

eld Airport,

Wayne County

son included

aircraft;

rport operati

s such as pe

parison of keluding recensenger enpland induced, asators in the

onal Airport

Bradley Inted from the nternational mic Impact At Center for E

O (CRQ)

al hnical Report

3

Yavapai

y, Detroit

d one or

ions; and

er capita

ey airport t airport nements, s well as airports’

t

rnational February Airport

Analysis” Economic


34

Analysis. Th$235.6 millisolely. Total BDL capital imand resulted$252.35 milli

6.2.2 Bob

Economic im(BUR) was oEconomic Imby Unison Meconomic aapproximatespending waeconomic acgenerated aeconomic acgenerated byin a total inco

6.2.3 Bow

Economic im(LOU) was oEconomic ImLouisville EcLouisville Reeconomic aapproximateLOU generattotal econoemploymentresulted in a million.

6.2.4 Erne

Economic imAirport (PRC)“Prescott Aprepared byAviation con

is study concion capital employmentmprovement d in a total inion to $495.9

Hope Airpo

mpact data obtained frommpact of Bob Maximus Consactivity attrly $628.1 as responsiblectivity. Baseapproximatelyctivity in 20y BUR was 3ome of appro

wman Field A

mpact data foobtained frommpact of Bconomy 200egional Airpactivity attrly $7.5 millioted approximomic activit generated btotal income

est A. Love F

mpact data fo) was obtaineAirport Econy William V. nsulting. D

cerned the imimprovement to be generwas 4,690 toncome of app7 million.

ort

for Bob Hom the 2006 rHope Airportsulting Solutioributed to million, whe for $1,124.ed on multiy $3.9 billio006. Total e6,000 jobs thoximately $1.2

Airport

or Bowman Fm the 2005 rBowman Fie05” prepareort Authoritributed to n. Based on mately $36.5ty in 2005y LOU was 37e of approxim

Field Airpor

or Ernest A. ed from the 2nomic ImpaCheek and

irect econom

mpact of the nt program rated by the o 9,352 jobs proximately

ope Airport report “The t” prepared ons. Direct BUR was

hile visitor 1 million in pliers, BUR on in total mployment hat resulted 2 billion.

ield Airport report “The ld on the d for the ty. Direct LOU was multipliers,

5 million in 5. Total 75 jobs that mately $11.4

t

Love Field 2006 report act Study” Associates

mic activity

attribumillionmilliontotal e

6.2.5

Econo(YIP) weconoprepaSchooattribumillion$22.1 generaeconogeneraresultemillion

Economic V

uted to PRCn. PRC genn in total ecoemployment

Willow Ru

omic impact was obtainedomic Impact red by the Uol of Managemuted to YIPn, while visitomillion in eated approxomic activity ated by YIP ed in a totaln.

New Ter

Vitality Anal

C was apprnerated appronomic activof approxima

un Airport

data for Wd from the of Willow Rniversity of Mment. DirectP was appor spending wconomic actiimately $200in 2007. Tin 2007 wa income of a

minal Buildin

lysis 200

roximately $roximately $vity in 2005 aately 738 jobs

illow Run A2007 report Run Airport 2Michigan Deat economic acroximately was responsibivity in 20070 million in Total employs 2,000 jobsapproximately

ng (CRQ)

8

25.37 68.76 and a s.

irport “The

2007” rborn ctivity $29.6 ble for . YIP total

yment s that y $63

2008

SEC

7.1 Tot

The totalPalomar sum of thoperationspending associatedcapital imof workerregional e

In 2008, accounted

Economic

Driven byDriven byDriven byDriven byTotal DireSource: KNote: To

8 Econom

CTION 7 –

tal Economi

l economic Airport to thhe business an of the Airof its use

d with ordersmprovement rs’ income. economy are

activity at d for $212.6

Tot

c Impact

y On‐Airport Ay Off‐Airport Vy Off‐Airport Ly Capital Imprect, Indirect aKimley‐Horn anotals may not a

New Termin

mic Vitality A

TOTAL E

ic Contribut

contribution he local comactivity assocrport and itsers, the buss to suppliersprogram, anThese contrisummarized

McClellan‐Pa6 million in

tal Economi

Activities Visitor SpendiLocal Purchasovement Proand Induced Ind Associates, add up due to

nal Building (

Analysis

ECONOMICECONO

ion

of McClellammunity is thciated with ths tenants, thsiness activis, the Airportnd re‐spendinbutions to thin Table 7.1.

alomar Airpolocal busine

ic Impacts o

ing ses ojects Impacts Inc. analysis 2rounding.

(CRQ)

C IMPACTOMIC IMP

n‐he he he ty t’s ng he

ort ess

revpaiairmi1,3incfroaccrev$3accrev$5

ThePalCo

•

•

•

It revgen

Table 7.1

f McClellan

Employme

1,176 1,306 80 121 2,684

008

TS AND ESPACTS

venue which id $54.2 miport visitor llion in local b306 local jobscome. Off‐airom local sucounted for venue which .9 million in pcounted for venue which .0 million in p

e total econlomar Airportunty region in

• 2,684 job

• $97.8 mil

• $359.1 m

should be venues of apnerated as a p

Palomar Ai

nt

$5$3$3$5$9

STIMATE

supported llion in persspending acbusiness reve and paid $34rport purchasuppliers of $12.8 milliosupported 8personal inco$15.6 milliosupported 12personal inco

nomic contribt to the Carlsn 2008 was:

s;

lion in person

illion in reven

noted that pproximatelyportion of thi

irport in 200

Income

54,180,000 34,720,000 3,880,000 5,010,000 97,790,000

F inTech

3

OF FUTU

1,176 local jsonal incomccounted forenue which su4.7 million in ses by airportgoods and on in local 80 local jobs me. The Airpon in local 21 local jobs me.

bution of Msbad/North S

nal income; a

nue.

state and ly $21.4 milliois total contri

08

Reven

$212,59$118,19$12,76$15,60$359,14

al hnical Report

5

RE

jobs and e. Off‐r $118.2 upported personal t tenants services business and paid port’s CIP business and paid

McClellan‐an Diego

nd

ocal tax on were bution.

nues

90,000 90,000 60,000 00,000 40,000


36

7.2 Estima

Estimates odetermined impacts throscenarios we

• The AspecForec

• The AirpoPlan (NPIA

7.2.1 GrowGrow

This growth passenger eAirport will annual growtairport operaof 0.9 percenof future eccorrelating passenger egrowth in ospending, puairport businat the Airpoincomes.

Economic Im

Driven by OnDriven by OffDriven by OffDriven by CaTotal Direct, Source: KimleNotes: Total Figur

ate of Futur

of future ecby extrapo

ough the yeere considered

Airport continified in the FAcast (TAF); or

Airport is deort as define

of IntegraAS).

wth Scenarwth Rate

scenario assenplanementscontinue to

th rate of 3.5ations grow ant, from 2008conomic impfuture gro

enplanementon‐airport burchases by anesses, capitart, and the r

Estima

mpact

n‐Airport Activf‐Airport Visitf‐Airport Locapital ImproveIndirect and ey‐Horn and Asls may not addres presented in

re Economic

conomic impolating the ar 2030. Td:

nues to growAA’s 2008 Ter

esignated asd in the FAAated Airpor

rio One –

sumes that s at McClello grow at a5 percent, ant an average 8 to 2030. Thpacts was caowth in ts and opeusiness activairport tenantal improvemere‐spending o

ated 2030 To

vities tor Spending al Purchases ement ProjectInduced Impssociates, Inc. ad up due to rounn 2008 Dollars

c Impact

pacts were total 2008 Two growth

w at the rate rminal Area

a Reliever A’s National rt Systems

FAA TAF

commercial an‐Palomar an average nd that total annual rate he estimate lculated by commercial erations to vity, visitor ts from off‐ent projects of workers’

Ta

otal Econom

Em

ts pacts analysis 2008nding. value.

The eMcClescenar

•

•

•

•

Table econoThesedollars

able 7.2

mic Impacts

mployment

1,447 2,920

99 149

4,615

Economic V

estimated futellan‐Palomarrio one is:

4,615 jobs;

$155.2 millio

$560.8 millio

$33.4 milliorevenues.

7.2 presenomic impacts numbers as.

– Growth Sc

Inc

$66,6$77,6$4,77$6,16

$155,2

Civic Helicop

Vitality Anal

ture economr Airport in 2

on in persona

on in revenue

on in state

nts the estims for growtare presente

cenario One

come

660,000 640,000 70,000 60,000 230,000

pters Constru

lysis 200

ic contributi030 under gr

l income;

; and

e and loca

mated year th scenario ed in year

e

Revenue

$261,570,0$264,300,0$15,700,0$19,190,0$560,760,0

uction (CRQ)

8

on of rowth

l tax

2030 one. 2007

es

000 000

000 000 000

2008

7.2.2 Ga

AccordingAirport ADiego Intannual 260,000 improvemrunway coUnder cirare not aPalomar reliever fooccur theand enpcomparabErnest A.

This growpassengeAirport wannual raoperationpercent, future ecorrelatinpassengegrowth ispending,airport bu

Economic

Driven byDriven byDriven byDriven byTotal DireSource: KNotes: To Fi

8 Econom

Growth Scens a Reliever

g to the SaAuthority, ruternational Aaircraft opeto 300,000.

ments occur ongestion wicumstances wattainable, aAirport may or certain type Airport couplanement leble to thoseLove Field A

wth scenario r enplanemewill continuete of 6.0 perns grow at anfrom 2008 tconomic imng future r enplanemn on‐airport, purchases business, capit

Esti

c Impact

y On‐Airport Ay Off‐Airport Vy Off‐Airport Ly Capital Imprect, Indirect aKimley‐Horn anotals may not aigures presente

mic Vitality A

nario Two –r Airport

n Diego Counway congeAirport is anterations rea. Unless cbetween 20ll not allow fwhere these irports such be evaluate

pes of traffic. uld experiencevels in 20 of Bob Hoirport.

assumes thents at McCe to grow arcent, and tha average annto 2030. Thpacts was growth inents and ot business aby airport tental improvem

mated 2030

Activities Visitor SpendiLocal Purchasovement Proand Induced Ind Associates, Iadd up due to ed in 2008 Doll

Analysis

– Designatio

ounty Regionestion at Saticipated wheach betweecertain airpo021 and 203further growtimprovemenas McClella

ed to act as If this were tce operation030 that aope Airport

at commerciClellan‐Palomat an averagat total airponual rate of 1he estimate calculated b commercioperations tactivity, visitnants from ofent projects

0 Total Econ

ing ses ojects Impacts Inc. analysis 20rounding. lars value.

on

nal an en en ort 30, th. nts n‐a to nal re or

ial ar ge ort 1.5 of by ial to or ff‐at

theinc

TheMcsce

•

•

•

•

TabecoThedo

Table 7.3

nomic Impac

Employme

1,657 4,988 113 171

6,928 009

e Airport, acomes.

e estimated cClellan‐Palomenario two is:

• 6,928 job

• $221.5 m

• $790.8 m

• $47.2 mrevenues.

ble 7.3 preonomic impese numberllars.

cts – Growth

nt

$7$13

$5$7

$22

Mercy

nd the re‐sp

future econmar Airport i

s;

illion in perso

illion in reven

million in st.

sents the eacts for grors are prese

h Scenario T

Income

76,310,000 32,620,000 5,460,000 7,060,000 21,450,000

y Air Flight Se

F inTech

3

pending of

omic contribn 2030 unde

onal income;

nue; and

tate and lo

estimated yeowth scenarented in ye

Two

Reven

$299,41$451,46$17,97$21,97$790,81

ervice (CRQ)

al hnical Report

7

workers’

bution of r growth

ocal tax

ear 2030 rio two. ear 2007

nues

10,000 60,000 70,000 70,000 10,000


38

THIS PAAGE INTEN

NTIONAL

Economic V

LLY LEFT B

Vitality Anal

BLANK

lysis 200

8

2008

8 Econom

APP

mic Vitality A

PENDIX A

Analysis

– AIRPOR

RT DATA COMPARRISON TAB

F inTech

BLE

al hnical Report


THIS PAAGE INTEN

NTIONAL

Economic V

LLY LEFT B

Vitality Anal

BLANK

lysis 200

8

Data Specifications BDL BUR LOU PRC YIP CRQ

Operations 141,313 1. 170,171 1. 99,865 1. 227,351 1. 83,881 1. 212,023 1.

Based Aircraft 81 1. & 2. 113 1. & 2. 368 1. & 2. 331 1. & 2. 244 2. 403 1. / 354 2.

Enplanements 3,475,480 1. 2,837,859 1. 0 1. 3,379 1. 1,712 1. 48,489 1.

2,400 (airport)

34,000 (airport induced employment) 4.

5‐year Capital Improvement Program Fund Total $99,059,119 7. $62,641,133 7. $6,652,339 7. $22,992,974 7. $64,510,688 7. $25,552,192 7.

High Level listing of 5‐10 Key Tenants

TAC Air (FBO, aircraft parking, passenger terminal & lounge, catering, courtesy transportation);

Signature Flight Support 2.

Million Air (FBO, aircraft parking, hangars, passenger terminal and lounge, catering, courtesy transportation); Delta Airlines; JetBlue Airways;

Federal Express; UPS; Ameriflight, Inc. 2, 4

Louisville Executive Aviation (FBO, aircraft parking, hangar leasing, GPU/power cart, passenger terminal & lounge); Central American Airways (FBO, aircraft parking, hangars, passenger terminal & lounge, aircraft charters, aircraft maintenance); Air Center 1 (flight training, aircraft rental, aerial tours, aircraft sales, pilot supplies);

Louisville Aviation, Le Relais Restaurant 2.

Legend Aviation (FBO, aircraft parking, aircraft maintainance, avionics repair, courtesy car available, hangar space, gourmet coffee & biscotti); Skyschool (flight training, aircraft rental, pilot supplies, restrooms); NostalgAire; Susie’s

Skyway Restaurant 2.

AvFlight Willow Run (FBO, Aircraft Parking, Hangars, Passenger Terminal & Lounge, Catering, Rental Cars, Etc.); USA Jet; Gourmet Airfare

(Catering) 2.

Western Flight Services (FBO); JetSource (FBO); Premier Jet (FBO); True North Fuel (FBO)

5. 4 ‘towns’ (East Granby, Suffield, Windsor Locks, Windsor) immediately surrounding BDL with

Mach 1 Industrial Park (Suffield)

Ahlstrom Plant (manufacturing in Windsor Locks)

Walgreens Distribution Center (Windsor)

ING Corporate Campus

Emhart Glass Research & Development Center

Hartford Life Office Campus

Approximate Local Area or Regional Multiplier Utiliized

RIMS II & REMI (no exact # found) 4.2.1833(regional final‐demand output multiplier for

Los Angeles County) 4.No number found 4. 0.9 4. RIMS II ( no exact # found) 4.

Approximate Population (SMSA)8 1,189,113 12,875,587 1,233,735 212,635 4,467,592 2,974,859

Per Capita Income (SMSA)8 $47,641 $41,875 $37,675 $27,900 $39,419 $44,832

Employment (SMSA)9 638,405 5,640,369 536,855 89,990 965,485 1,863,240

1. FAA Forecasts 8. www.bea.gov (2007 data)2. www.airnav.com 9. www.bea.gov (2006 data)3. www.gcr1.com 10. www.cityofprescott.net/services/airport/admin.php 4. Economic Studies on file 11. www.willowrunairport.com/business 5. www.bradleydevelopment.com 12. www.metroairport.com/about/facts 6. 2006 Bradley Annual Report7. NPIAS

BDL – Bradley International Airport, Hartford County, Windsor Locks CTBUR – Bob Hope Airport, Los Angeles County, Burbank CALOU – Bowman Field Airport, Jefferson County, Louisville KYPRC – Ernest A. Love Field Airport, Yavapai County, Prescott AZYIP – Willow Run Airport, Wayne County, Detroit MICRQ – McClellan‐Palomar Airport, San Diego County, Carlsbad CA

Appendix A Airport Data Comparison Table

Number of Employees (airport wide)

18,000 6. 250 4. 666 10. 18,700 12.

Sources:

Description of any nearby business or industrial parks

Located 13 miles from downtown Los Angeles. Very urban

Residential / Commercial / Golf courses Residential / Commercial 10.Yankee Air Museum, Industrial, Technology/

Office, Environmental Zone/Park 11.

Commercial/Industrial zoned parks adjacent to the airport include: Carlsbad Airport Center (zoned Planned Industrial) and Carlsbad Research Center (zoned Heavy Commercial); major tenants include Callaway Golf, Invitrogen, Taylor Made‐Adidas Golf, City of Carlsbad, Acushnet, Isis Pharmaceuticals, Abbot Labs, Lowes Western Div, Rubios


THIS PA

AGE INTE

NTIONAL

Economi

LLY LEFT B

ic Vitality A

BLANK

nalysis 20

008

2008

8 Econom

mic Vitality A

AP

Analysis

PPENDIX B

B – PAPER

R SURVEYYS

F inTech

al hnical Report


THIS PA

AGE INTE

NTIONAL

Economi

LLY LEFT B

ic Vitality A

BLANK

nalysis 20

008

2008 TRANSIENT PASSENGER / PILOT QUESTIONNAIRE Recognizing that the McClellan-Palomar Airport provides valuable general aviation, corporate and commercial services to North San Diego County and the City of Carlsbad, an Economic Vitality Analysis is being conducted by the San Diego County Department of Airports to assess the importance, value and economic vitality that the Airport affords the local community. This supporting survey is being performed as a means of estimating the economic contribution of the Airport, its tenants and users, upon San Diego County and the City of Carlsbad, and their economies. Please help make a difference in the outcome of this critically important study by completing this survey as soon as possible.

Your input is of great value to the County, the City and the Airport. All of the information you provide on this survey will remain strictly confidential. No individual’s data will be published.

1. What airport did you begin your travel from (arriving passengers or transient pilots) or which airport will be your final destination (departing passengers or transient pilots)? _______________________________________

2. What is your state/country/ZIP code of residence? ____________/__________________/___________

3. How many times have you used the Palomar airport in the past 12 months? 1–2 times 3–6 times more than 6 times

4. How many people are traveling in your party today, including yourself? __________________________

5. What was the purpose of your trip? Circle One: Aircraft Services / Business On-Airport/ Business Off-Airport/ Pleasure/ Other(please specify) _______________________________________________

6. What was your length of stay in the area (number of nights)? ________________________

7. If you stayed in an area hotel, which hotel did you stay at? __________________________

8. How did you arrive at or plan to leave the airport, and if applicable, how much did you spend on transportation? Circle One: Limo / Personal Car / Rental Car / Shuttle / Taxi /

Other(please specify) _____________________________________ Amount Spent: $ ___________________

9. Approximately how much did you spend on each of the following items during your stay? If travelling as a family member or group, please show the combined total of expenditures made by all.

Hotel/ Motel $Food and Beverage $Entertainment $Airfare $Other $

10. What can be done to enhance your travel experience to or from McClellan-Palomar Airport?

Once complete, kindly fax, email, or mail your questionnaire to the following:

Peter Drinkwater, Department of Public Works 619-956-4801 (fax) [email protected]

Gillespie Field Admin Building 1960 Joe Crosson Drive El Cajon, CA 92020-1236


THIS PA

AGE INTE

NTIONAL

Economi

LLY LEFT B

ic Vitality A

BLANK

nalysis 20

008

Page 1

2008 AIRPORT TENANT QUESTIONNAIRE

Recognizing that the McClellan-Palomar Airport provides valuable general aviation, corporate and commercial services to North San Diego County and the City of Carlsbad, an Economic Vitality Analysis is being conducted by the San Diego County Department of Airports to assess the importance, value and economic vitality that the Airport affords the local community. This supporting survey is being performed as a means of estimating the economic contribution of the Airport, its tenants and users, upon San Diego County and the City of Carlsbad, and their economies. Please help make a difference in the outcome of this critically important study by completing this survey as soon as possible.

Your input is of great value to the County, the City and the Airport. All of the information you provide on this survey will remain strictly confidential. No individual’s data will be published; only analyses and summaries will be reported. The summary findings from this study will be made publicly available by the County upon its completion.

NAME OF TENANT: CONTACT:

MAILING ADDRESS: TITLE: EMAIL:

TELEPHONE NO: FAX NO.:

1. Is your company or business headquartered in San Diego County? YES or NO (circle one) If not, please indicate the headquarters location. _____________________________________________

2. What type of service(s) do you provide? Please check all that apply and indicate the percentage of your operation if you provide more than one of these services listed:

Airport/Airline or General Aviation Related %

Passenger Ground Transportation %

Freight Transportation %

Construction or Consulting Services %

3. Do you currently sublease space to anyone? Yes No

If you checked Yes, please supply a list of sublease tenants in the space below. If more space is required, please attach a listing.

Page 2

4. How many employees are on your payroll and associated with aviation activities at the airport?

Number of Full Time Employees

Number of Part Time Employees

5. What was your annual gross payroll for the employees located at the airport in 2007?

Est. Annual Payroll $

6. What was your annual revenue / total sales associated with aviation activities at the airport in 2007?

Est. Annual Revenue/ Total Sales $

7. What was your annual expenditure for goods, services, supplies, and equipment associated with aviation

activities at the airport in 2007?

Est. Annual Revenue/ Total Sales $

8. What was your annual expenditure on capital projects associated with aviation activities at the airport in 2007?

Est. Annual Expenditure Capital Projects $

a. Did you utilize local contractors or make any local purchases for capital projects?

Yes No b. If you checked Yes, who were your main local contractors/suppliers and what was your annual

expenditure for each?

Contractors/Suppliers Name or Category Est. Annual Expenditure

$

$

$

$

9. What was your annual expenditure on goods, services, supplies, and equipment associated with aviation

activities at the airport in 2007?

Est. Annual Expenditure Goods/Services/Etc. $

a. Did you purchase any of these goods and services locally? Yes No

Page 3

b. If you checked Yes, who were your main local suppliers and what was your annual expenditure with these suppliers?

Suppliers Name or Category Est. Annual Expenditure

$

$

$

$

NOTE: The survey analysis hopes to reflect the total economic benefit of the McClellan-Palomar Airport; therefore, in cases where your business at the Airport serves at the aviation unit of a larger company in the San Diego County area, please provide your parent company’s name, its location and a contact person below. We will inquire about total employment and total company revenues.

PARENT COMPANY:

LOCATION:

CONTACT NAME:

CONTACT PHONE# / EMAIL:

We wish to express our thanks to your for taking the necessary time to complete this valued questionnaire. Once complete, kindly email, mail, or fax your questionnaire to the following: Attn:

Peter Drinkwater [email protected] Department of Public Works Gillespie Field Admin Building 1960 Joe Crosson Drive El Cajon, CA 92020-1236 619-956-4801 (fax)


THIS PA

AGE INTE

NTIONAL

Economi

LLY LEFT B

ic Vitality A

BLANK

nalysis 20

008

Date post:	28-Sep-2020
Category:	Documents
Upload:	others
View:	2 times
Download:	0 times

Final Technical Report ECONOMIC VITALITY ANALYSIS STUDY...its vitality DIRECT Direct i occurring...

Documents