Date post: | 02-Nov-2014 |
Category: |
Career |
Upload: | manutdmjew23 |
View: | 932 times |
Download: | 0 times |
Environmental Review of Telford Court
By Matthew Wheeler
Introduction.
Importance of Environmental Review.
• Green Image, reputation
• Save money on electricity and water bills
• Allows environmental policy to be reviewed and Influence how environmental performance is measured
• A University may have similar usage of resources as a Medium sized city, University’s job is to educate people
Importance of Environmental Review Continued.
• University of Hertfordshire teaches 24,000 students and employs 2,500 members of staff
• Large impacts on local environment
• Schemes to minimise impact include a zero waste programme.
University of Hertfordshire Environmental Policy
• Structured to follow legislation
• Implemented and monitored by regulators
• Drawn up using scientific evidence
• Aims to protect the local environment through a number of different methods.
• Environmental management system in place
• Environmental team aim to teach staff and students
University draft waste and resource
management strategy 1. (K. O’Brien, pers. Comm.)
• 6 year vision from 2008/9 to 2013/14, 90% waste recycled, 50% reduction in waste.
• Manage resources more sustainably, promote recycling, reuse and waste prevention, reduce costs, comply with legislation
• Waste managed by department of estates working closely with the university environment team
University draft waste and resource management strategy 2.
• Principles of waste management strategy based on waste hierarchy, prevention more effective than treatment (Figure 1)
• Waste diverted from landfills to recycling
• 3 phases, short term, medium term and long term (Figure 2)
Figure 1. Waste Hierarchy
Figure 2. 3 phases of management strategy
Phases of Management Strategy
• Short term - Maximising recycling, new waste management system
• Medium term - Waste prevention and minimisation techniques
• Long term - 100% waste diverted from landfills, reuse of materials and waste prevention
Figure 3. Waste management targets
Figure 4. Waste management performance in recent years
Monthly variations in waste
• Figure 5 - increases in waste production start of new term, during summer term, peak between June and July
• Figure 6. Recycling 30% past 3 years, peak between June and August
Figure 5. Amount of waste produced in tonnes per month for 2005/6, 2006/7, 2007/8
Figure 6. Graph comparing levels of recycling per month for 2005/6, 2006/7, 2007/8
University draft waste and resources
management strategy 3. • 2 year contract with waste management company,
may extend to 4 years
• Waste sent to company, 35% recycled
• Three bin system in halls of residence, one for mixed recycables, one for glass, one for general waste
• Food collection initiative to be launched, textile recycling facilities in place
• Records kept of movement of waste on site
University draft waste and resource
management strategy 4. • Waste transfer note accompanies non-hazardous
waste, consignment note accompanies hazardous waste
• Investment in on site recycling facilities
• Two groups established to monitor waste management. Waste steering group meets monthly, waste working group bi-monthly
• Campaigns promoting material re-use and waste prevention to be undertaken.
Telford Court waste in figures
• August 2008 - 1.149 tonnes waste produced, 0.285 tonnes recycled, 25% compared with University’s 52%
• September 2008 - 2.9195 tonnes waste produced, 0.4575 tonnes recycled, 16% compared with University’s 71%
• October 2008 - 4.5525 tonnes waste produced, 0.6675 tonnes recycled, 15% compared with university’s 68%
Study Area - Telford Court
• Telford Court Student Accommodation, University of Hertfordshire, College Lane Campus
• Older of the two main University Campuses
• Built in 1994, contains 82 6 bedroom flats and 2 3 bedroom flats.
• 498 students living in Telford Court each academic year
• Situated close to Student Union and Lecture halls
Map of Telford Court.
Bateman. pers. Comm..
Aims.
• Carry out Environmental Review of Telford Court
• Assess University’s Environmental Policy
• Consider issues such as waste management, water and electricity uses, noise pollution, chemical use etc.
Objectives• Review Policies, Laws and Guidance
• Information/Data Collected through observation, monitoring and speaking to people in charge of Telford Court
Rationale
• Previous studies have looked at lecture halls, students attitudes towards recycling (Kelly et al, 2006) and emissions from student travel (Rory et al, 2008).
• Little work on student accommodation
• Compare policy aims with reality
Methodology
• Develop Environmental checklist to help with observations
• Gather information from the University Environment team regarding practices at Telford Court
• Carry out an Environmental review site visit
• Meet with the energy manager for Telford court
Methodology Continued
• Shriberg (2000) suggests a 5 step approach, used with his study at the University of Michigan
• Step 1. Survey the environmental impact
• Step 2. Analyse current environmental initiatives
• Step 3. Propose a long-term sustainability vision
• Step 4. Recommend actions to move towards the vision
• Step 5. Suggest indicators of success or failure
Environmental Checklist Questions.
• Recycling - Types of waste recycled, techniques, amount etc.
• Water usage in and outside of flats - Type, amount etc
• Transport - Cars, bicycles, motorbikes etc
• Chemical waste in and outside of flats - Types, amount, treatment etc
• Litter - Amount, Ttypes etc
• Waste management - Techniques, type of waste, amount etc
Environmental Checklist Continued
• Noise pollution - Amount, sources etc
• Electricity usage - Amount etc.
Meeting with University Energy Manager
• Find out who is responsible for each of the management issues at Telford Court
• Find out about how energy use etc is monitored
Wider Implications
• Possible implications for other areas of the University, other Universities, organizations which have a large number of people living in close proximity
• Cause organizations to review their Environmental policies
• Change practices
• Environmental Reviews are generally found to increase an organization’s environmental awareness and to encourage them to be more environmentally friendly (Sinclair-Desgagn & Gabel, 1996).
References.• Bateman, R. pers. comm. 19th January 2009.
• Bonnet, J., Devel, C., Faucher, F., Routurier, J. (2001) Analysis of electricity and water end-uses in a University Campus: Case-study of the University of Bordeaux in the framework of the Eco-campus European Collaboration. Journal of Cleaner Production. 10 pp. 13-24
• Cagno, E., Di Giulio, A., Trucco, P. (1999). A Methodological framework for the initial environmental review in EMS implementation. Journal of Environmental Assessment, Policy, and Management. 1 (4) pp. 502-532
• Eco-schools. (2007). Formal Review. [Online] Available at: http://www.eco-schools.org.uk/getting-started/environmental-review.aspx. [Accessed 27th October 2008].
• Envirowise. (2004). Environmental Audits. [Online] Available at: http://www.envirowise.gov.uk/page.aspx?o=119479. [Accessed 27th October 2008].
• Kelly, T. C., Mason, I. G., Leiss, M. W., Ganesh, S. (2006). University community responses to on-campus resource recycling. Resources conservation and recycling. 38 (4) pp.257 - 269
• Mason, I. G., Brooking, A. K., Oberender, A., Harford, J.M., Horsley, P.G. (2003) Implementation of a zero waste program at a university campus. Resources Conservation and Planning. 38 (4) pp. 257-269
• O’Brien, K. pers. comm. 23rd December 2008.
References Continued• Panaramio. (2007).Telford Court in College Lane Campus University of Hertfordshire.
[Online] Available at: http://www.panaramio.com/photo/1813115. [Accessed 6th January 2009].
• Probert, S. D. (1995) Environmentally and Energy responsible Universities. Applied Energy. 50 (1) pp. 69-83
• Prof Wilson, R. J. T. (2007). University of Hertfordshire Environmental Policy. [Online] Available at: http://sitem.herts.ac.uk/sustainable/env_policy.htm. [Accessed 7th October 2008].
• Scott, E.M. (2007). Setting and evaluating the effectiveness of Environmental Policy. Evironmetrics. 18 (3) pp. 33-343
• Shriberg, M. (2000). Toward sustainable management: The University of Michigan Housing Divisions approach. Journal of cleaner production. 10 (1) pp. 41-45
• University of Hertfordshire. (2008) College Lane Campus. [Online] Available at: http://www.pan3sixty.co.uk/tours/uoh/qt-clmap.htm [Accessed 12th January 2009].