1
Subject:
Finance and QIPP (Quality, Innovation, Productivity & Prevention) Plan 2016/17
Presented by:
John Ingham, Chief Financial Officer
Submitted to:
NHS West Norfolk CCG Governing Body, 31 March 2016
Purpose of Paper:
For discussion and approval
Executive Summary: Clinical Commissioning Groups (CCGs) have a fundamental financial duty to ensure that their expenditure does not exceed the amount allocated by NHS England. Part of the process for delivering this duty is for a CCG to produce a balanced financial plan each year. Furthermore, CCGs are expected to meet key financial planning requirements set down by NHS England (the “business rules”). This paper outlines the West Norfolk CCG funding allocation of £240.4m for 2016/17 and proposes start year budgets totalling £238.0m net of a QIPP (Quality, Innovation, Productivity, Prevention) plan of £9.8m in order to deliver the planning requirements. This QIPP target is an increased challenge compared to previous years at 4% of annual expenditure. This paper also highlights key risks to delivery of financial balance in 2016/17 and associated mitigations.
KEY RISKS:
Clinical: None
Finance and Performance: This paper presents a balanced budget for 2016/17 but highlights financial
risks in Section 9.
Impact Assessment (environmental and equalities): None
Reputation: Failure to deliver a balanced financial position will adversely affect the reputation of the
CCG and could affect its on-going viability.
Legal: None
Patient focus (if appropriate): None
Reference to relevant Governing Body Assurance Framework: 4.1, 4.2, 4.3, 4.4
Recommendation:
The Governing Body is asked to:
Note the CCG funding allocation for 2016/17 totalling £240.41m;
Approve the start year budgets totalling £238.00m proposed in Section 7, noting the QIPP (savings) requirement of £9.84m in order to deliver the required 1% surplus;
Approve the QIPP plan outlined in Section 6 to deliver the QIPP requirement;
Note the financial risks to delivery of the 1% surplus in 2016/17 and potential mitigations as described in Section 9.
Agenda Item: 16.40c
2
1. Introduction 1.1 In January 2016 the Governing Body received a paper that outlined the CCG’s financial allocation
for 2016/17 and the high-level financial plan. This paper provides an update and further detail in respect of the 2016/17 financial plan and specifically requests approval of the start year budgets. The paper describes:
the resources available for 2016/17,
the national financial planning requirements,
the application of growth resources,
the current 2016/17 QIPP plan,
summary 2016/17 budgets by expenditure area,
the underlying financial position of the CCG, and
risks to delivery of the financial plan along with potential mitigations.
1.2 The information in this paper is largely consistent with that provided to NHS England in a draft
financial plan submission as at 2nd March 2016. A further, final submission is required by NHS England for 11th April, and any changes reflected in this version will be notified to the Governing Body in May.
2. Resources Available in 2016/17 2.1 The Governing Body paper in January 2016 advised that the CCG’s programme (ie commissioning)
allocation for 2016/17 will increase by £10.4m, which represents an uplift of 4.62%. This compares favourably with the minimum uplift for CCGs of 3.05% and the average uplift of 4.24% across East of England CCGs.
2.2 The CCG’s Running Cost Allowance for 2016/17 has increased by £0.023m which equates to 0.6%.
Running Costs Allowances have been maintained at a “flat cash” level nationally, with marginal changes for individual CCGs dependent on relative population growth.
2.3 The resulting total CCG allocation for 2016/17 is summarised in Table 1 below
Table 1 – 2016/17 Resource Limit
2.4 Since the January Governing Body meeting there has been further clarification that the 2016/17
recurrent growth funding includes specific allocations that had previously been awarded non-recurrently, as follows:
£665k funding for the Enhanced Tariff Option (ETO) within 2015/16 national prices,
Description
£000 £000 £000
2015/16 recurrent allocation b/f 224,037 3,678 227,715
Recurrent growth 10,352 23 10,375
Recurrent funding 2016/17 234,389 3,701 238,090
Non-recurrent allocations:
Return of 2015/16 surplus 2,317 - 2,317
Total funding 2016/17 236,706 3,701 240,407
Running
costs
Programme
spend
CCG
Total
3
£453k GPIT funding, and
£350k transformational funding for Child & Adolescent Mental Health Services (CAMHS).
In addition, it should be noted that the CCG’s 2016/17 growth funding is linked to population changes, and therefore the growth in Programme allocation includes the recurrent impact of patients transferring from Watton to Swaffham practices in 2014, for which the CCG received a non-recurrent funding transfer in 2015/16 of £788k from South Norfolk CCG. The value of growth funding excluding these specific factors is £8,096k, which equates to a real uplift of 3.61% on 2015/16 recurrent funding.
3. 2016/17 National Planning Requirements 3.1 Each year NHS England publishes its planning requirements for CCGs, known as the “business
rules”. For 2016/17 these include the following:
Delivery of a cumulative surplus of 1% of allocation (as in previous years);
Establishment of a Contingency Reserve of at least 0.5% of allocation (as in previous years);
Setting aside a 1% non-recurrent risk reserve, to be uncommitted at the start of the financial year. This reserve is to be regarded as a mitigation for financial risk throughout local health systems, and guidance states that approval for spending of the 1% non-recurrent monies during the year will be subject to approval by HM Treasury. This is a fundamental change from previous years when use of the 1% reserve has been at the local discretion of CCGs;
Delivery of Parity of Esteem for mental health services, such that overall CCG spending on mental health services increases by at least the same percentage uplift as a CCG’s allocation. It is important to note that this requirement relates to the totality of spending on mental health services, including areas such as Continuing Healthcare packages and GP prescribing, and that the real uplift in allocation for West Norfolk CCG is 3.61% as explained above.
3.2 Also, NHS England and Monitor are jointly responsible for setting the prices for payments to acute
hospitals under Payment by Results (PbR), and by default for the price uplifts that are to apply to non-PbR / non-acute services. In recent years national prices have reduced, as provider efficiency requirements of 4% per year have exceeded the allowances for cost inflation. However in 2016/17 this position is reversed, with provider cost inflation of 3.1% being only part offset by a 2% efficiency requirement. This results in a headline price (tariff) uplift of 1.1% for all NHS providers, with an additional uplift of 0.7% for acute Trusts as a result of further increases in the cost of the Clinical Negligence Scheme for Trusts (CNST).
3.3 A further national requirement for 2016/17 is that all CCGs need to contribute to a national risk-pool
for legacy Continuing Healthcare (CHC) claims. This is the third and final year of this risk-pool, and contributions have been notified to CCGs; for West Norfolk the figure is £262k.
4. Local Planning Assumptions 4.1 In addition to the national planning requirements the CCG’s financial plan reflects a number of local
planning assumptions, the key areas for 2016/17 being as follows:
Demographic growth 1.3%
Non-demographic growth - acute services 1.1%
Non-demographic growth - continuing healthcare 3.7% (ie total growth 5.0%)
Non-demographic growth - GP prescribing 3.7% (ie total growth 5.0%)
Non-demographic growth - high cost drugs 8.7% (ie total growth 10.0%).
4
5. Application of Growth Funding
5.1 As noted in section 2 above the CCG has received £10.375m growth in resources in 2016/17. In order to deliver a financial plan that meets the national planning requirements and local planning assumptions, this resource growth has been applied as shown in Table 2 below.
Table 2 – Application of growth funding 2016/17
5.2 Two key points to note from Table 2 are that:
Whilst the CCG is forecasting delivery of a surplus of 1% in 2015/16 this is supported by non-recurrent means (such as contractual penalties and challenges) which masks the recurrent underlying exit position for 2015/16 which is a shortfall of £2,719k. The underlying position for 2016/17 is discussed further in section 8.
Despite the CCG receiving an uplift in funding of over £10m, the various requirements for 2016/17 lead to a savings (QIPP) target of £9.836m in order to deliver the required 1% surplus at the end of 2016/17. This is discussed further in section 6.
Description £000 Notes
2016/17 Additional Resources:
Growth funding 10,375
2015/16 surplus b/f 2,317
Less requirement for 2016/17 surplus c/f (2,405)
Total available resources 10,287
Application of Resources:
Recurrent shortfall from 2015/16 2,719
15/16 position supported by one-off allocations and
non-recurrent benefits (eg contract penalties &
challenges)
Price (tariff) inflation net of efficiency 2,806 National uplifts of 1.1% / 1.8% (acute)
Demographic growth 2,749 Local assumption of 1.3%
NHS England "Business Rules" 3,934 Includes 1% non-rec reserve, 0.5% Contingency
Reserve
Other recurrent growth / cost pressures 6,797
Includes non-demographic growth (especially CHC,
Prescribing), areas where national funding no longer
available (eg GPIT), and other known cost pressures
1,117
Specific items such as contribution to national CHC
risk-pool, Pathology transition costs, and local QIPP
Reserve.
Total applications 20,123
Balance = QIPP target (9,836)
Other non-recurrent growth / cost
pressures
5
6. Bridging the Gap - QIPP (Quality, Innovation, Productivity, Prevention) Savings 6.1 As noted above in Section 5 the CCG proposed budgets for 2016/17, based on a range of
reasonable planning assumptions, lead to a shortfall of £9.84m (4.0% of planned expenditure). A number of initiatives have been identified to bridge this gap, which contribute to a current QIPP plan totalling £10.67m.
6.2 The current QIPP plan for 2016/17 is summarised below in Table 3, with further details shown in
Appendices B and C. Key points to note from Table 3 are that:
70% of the value of QIPP schemes is contained within the Top 10 schemes;
80% of the schemes are transactional and 20% transformational; and
The current programme totals £0.84m more than the QIPP requirement, which equates to “headroom” of 9%.
Table 3: Summary of 2016/17 QIPP programme
6.3 It is important for the CCG to create additional “headroom” above the QIPP target to mitigate the
risks associated with delays in implementation of schemes or non-delivery. This is in the context of actual QIPP delivery in previous years of 60%-70% of plan, so in order to deliver £10m of savings the CCG should be targeting around £14m of schemes. To help the CCG achieve further “headroom” and to increase the level of delivery the CCG is focusing on a number of key areas:
Resource optimisation – It is vital that as an organisation, we maximise the effectiveness of the resource available to us so that we are able to make sure we have the right people with the right skill set to deliver our goals. We have embarked upon an in-house training round where we will be developing the wider team. This includes topics such as:
o Project Planning, o Risk and Issue Management, o Financial Analysis o Stakeholder Management.
These sessions are designed to strengthen the team to enable the development of skilled multi-disciplinary project teams so that more projects are delivered on time, on budget and in full.
QIPP scheme structure – With any organisation of our size there are only a finite number of schemes that can be actively managed and delivered successfully. With this in mind the
Description £m %
Top 10 QIPP schemes (see App B for details) 7.50 70%
Other schemes (see App C for details) 3.17 30%
Total QIPP plan 10.67 100%
QIPP requirement 9.84
Headroom / (gap) 0.84
Split of QIPP plan by Transformational / Transactional:
Description £m %
Transactional 8.52 80%
Transformational 2.15 20%
Total QIPP plan 10.67 100%
6
schemes are being structured into programmes of work which align projects with key dependencies. This allows the project teams to develop the schemes “in the round” rather than in isolation. This programme approach will allow us to increase the number of areas which we can develop and change without dramatically increasing the resource available.
Resource review – Once we have structured the QIPP schemes into programmes of work and optimised our resource we will be able to identify any gaps we have in the delivery of the QIPP schemes. This will allow us to make sure that any gaps that we have can be met in the most efficient and economical way.
Development of an active QIPP development pipeline – It is vital that QIPP development is a rolling process that is embedded as part of the ‘day’ job’. Rather than QIPP being a separate entity or there being an annual QIPP cycle, the programme teams will be working on their specific areas with QIPP being a component part of their thinking. The product being that they are able to develop opportunities on a regular basis. Taking this approach it is expected that further schemes will be initiated throughout 2016/17 that will build the QIPP programme for 2016/17 and 2017/18 and create further in-year ‘headroom’.
Long List analysis – In addition to schemes developing from the teams’ daily activity, we have developed a ‘long list’ of further ideas. These are currently being reviewed and from this a number of schemes will be identified to be worked up within the programmes of work detailed above.
6.4 Following analysis of historic levels of QIPP delivery the CCG has also reviewed the project process
and governance. The process has been streamlined so that it is more tailored to the size and capability of the organisation while making sure that there is no loss of control or governance. The system is summarised below:
Note re abbreviations: CLEX = Clinical Executive (meets monthly), SMT = Senior Management Team (meets weekly), SRO = Senior Responsible Officer, BI = Business Intelligence The Task and Finish groups are multi-disciplinary teams which will be working on focused programmes of work. The clinical leads play a vital role in the groups, helping to develop the schemes with strong clinical guidance and championing the schemes through the developmental stages.
7
6.5 It should be noted that the QIPP plan outlined in 6.2 will continue to evolve over coming weeks as schemes are developed and signed off internally and further headroom generated, and an updated plan will be brought to the May Governing Body meeting.
6.6 It is also important to note that the CCG’s financial plan includes a small reserve of £0.5m for
enabling QIPP initiatives; this will be used for additional project management as necessary, for sessional pharmacist time to support the Prescribing Quality Scheme, and for any other one-off enabling costs.
7. 2016/17 Summary Budgets 7.1 The start year budgets resulting from the application of growth funding outlined in section 5 and the
QIPP schemes described in section 6 are summarised in table 4 below, with further detail shown at Appendix A.
7.2 Appendix A provides a breakdown of the budgets by category of expenditure and application of growth funding, showing the starting position of the 2015/16 forecast and the planned 2016/17 final position.
7.3 The Governing Body is asked to approve the budgets in Table 4, and to note that these remain subject to amendment as work is on-going to finalise 2016/17 contracts. Any resulting changes to the start year budgets will be submitted to the May Governing Body for further approval. Table 4 - Summary Budgets by Expenditure Area
£000 £000 £000
Expenditure Area
Acute 138,783 (6,243) 132,540
Mental Health 17,233 (229) 17,004
Continuing Healthcare 13,969 (1,374) 12,595
Community 27,915 (2,014) 25,901
GP Prescribing 33,893 (808) 33,085
Other Primary Care 7,095 - 7,095
Other Programme Costs 1,702 832 2,534
1% Non-Recurrent Reserve 2,344 - 2,344
Running Costs 3,701 - 3,701
Contingency Reserve 1,203 - 1,203
TOTAL BUDGETS 247,838 (9,836) 238,002
Resource Limit
Recurrent Programme Allocation 234,389 - 234,389
Running Cost Allowance 3,701 - 3,701
Non-Recurrent Allocations - - -
Brought Forward Surplus 2,317 - 2,317
TOTAL RESOURCE LIMIT 240,407 - 240,407
SURPLUS / (DEFICIT) (7,431) 9,836 2,405
Description Total before
QIPP
QIPP
Savings
Total
Start Year
Budgets
8
8. Underlying Financial Position 2016/17 8.1 As stated in Table 2 and further demonstrated in Appendix A, it is important to note that whilst the
CCG is expecting to deliver a cumulative surplus of £2.317m in 2015/16, the underlying recurrent position is a deficit of £2.719m. This reflects the fact that the CCG’s 2015/16 in-year Financial Recovery Plan has increasingly relied on non-recurrent measures such as the benefit from additional one-off allocations received in recent months, acute contract penalties and challenges, and non-recurrent reserves.
8.2 This underlying deficit contributes to the high level of QIPP savings required in 2016/17, as shown above in section 5. Provided these savings are delivered recurrently, the CCG’s position as at the end of 2016/17 will be much healthier with a recurrent surplus of £3.5m ie 1.5% of expenditure, as shown in Table 5:
Table 5 – Summary of 2016/17 underlying position
The main elements of planned non-recurrent spending are:
1% risk reserve (as described in section 3.1) £2.34m;
QIPP enabling reserve of £0.50m;
CHC national risk-pool contribution of £0.26m (as described in section 3.3);
The final year of transition costs for the local Pathology contract £0.36m.
9. Risks and Mitigations 9.1 In addition to the elements factored into the 2016/17 financial plan there remain a number of risks
that could jeopardise delivery of the required 1% surplus. These are outlined in table 6 below, along with potential mitigations. If all of the risks and mitigations materialise as per table 6, then the CCG would deliver a deficit in 2016/17. It is therefore critical that this position continues to be reviewed over the coming weeks as QIPP schemes are progressed and provider contracts finalised, and an update will be reported to the May Governing Body. Table 6 – Risks to delivery of 2016/17 financial plan
Description
£000 £000 £000
Planned spend (after QIPP) 234,541 3,461 238,002
Funding 238,090 2,317 240,407
Surplus / (Deficit) 3,549 (1,144) 2,405
Surplus / (Deficit) as % of funding 1.5% 1.0%
Recurrent
position
Non-rec
position
2016/17
Total
Risks Potential
risk value
Notes
£m
Acute SLAs activity above plan 0.67 Full risk value reflects a further 1% growth
Continuing Healthcare activity above plan 0.32 Full risk value reflects a further 5% growth
QIPP: delivery risks 2.46 Full risk value = total identified QIPP
GP Prescribing activity growth above plan 0.33 Full risk value reflects a further 2% growth
Other risks 1.50 16/17 contract settlements + remaining risk to delivery of
2015/16 surplus
Total risks 5.28
9
Table 6 – Potential mitigations
10. Conclusion 10.1 2016/17 will be a very challenging year for the CCG as it seeks to rectify an underlying recurrent
deficit and deliver the service and financial requirements expected of the CCG by both the local population and by NHS England. This paper outlines a financial plan that meets these requirements but which necessitates delivery of a QIPP target of £9.8m that is greater than that delivered in previous years.
10.2 The Governing Body is asked to acknowledge the contents of this paper and to approve the summary budgets outlined in section 7.
Mitigations Potential
mitigation
value
Notes
£000
Contingency reserve 0.60 Assume 50% needed for other risks arising in year
CCG cost pressures reserve 0.90 Set aside for unforeseen pressures
Other non-recurrent measures 0.30 Additional allocations in-year (as received in 2015/16)
Total mitigations 1.80
Net (risk) / mitigation (3.50)
10
APPENDIX A
WNCCG Proposed Start Year Budgets 2016/17
Tariff Uplift
Demographic
Growth
NHS
England
"Business
Rules"
Other
Recurrent
Growth /
Cost
Pressures
Other Non-
Recurrent
Cost
Pressures
£000 £000 £000 £000 £000 £000 £000 £000 £000 £000 £000
Expenditure Area
Acute 129,994 983 130,977 2,261 1,633 - 3,556 355 138,783 (6,243) 132,540
Mental Health 16,439 33 16,472 171 202 388 - - 17,233 (229) 17,004
Continuing Healthcare 13,501 (455) 13,046 9 170 - 483 262 13,969 (1,374) 12,595
Community 27,241 209 27,450 211 255 - - - 27,915 (2,014) 25,901
GP Prescribing 32,279 - 32,279 - 420 - 1,194 - 33,893 (808) 33,085
Other Primary Care 6,785 (253) 6,532 41 70 - 453 - 7,095 - 7,095
Other Programme Costs (132) 132 - - - - 1,202 500 1,702 832 2,534
1% Non-Recurrent Reserve - - - - - 2,344 - - 2,344 - 2,344
Running Costs 3,678 - 3,678 114 - - (91) - 3,701 - 3,701
Contingency Reserve - - - - - 1,203 - - 1,203 - 1,203
TOTAL BUDGETS 229,785 649 230,434 2,806 2,749 3,934 6,797 1,117 247,838 (9,836) 238,002
Resource Limit
Recurrent Programme Allocation 224,037 - 224,037 234,389 - 234,389
Running Cost Allowance 3,678 - 3,678 3,701 - 3,701
Non-Recurrent Allocations 2,182 (2,182) - - - -
Brought Forward Surplus 2,205 (2,205) - 2,317 - 2,317
TOTAL RESOURCE LIMIT 232,102 (4,387) 227,715 240,407 - 240,407
SURPLUS / (DEFICIT) 2,317 (5,036) (2,719) (7,431) 9,836 2,405
Description
2015/16
Forecast
Outturn
Adjustments
for 2015/16
Non-
Recurrent
Issues
2015/16
Recurrent
Forecast
2016/17 Changes
2016/17
Total Before
QIPP
2016/17
QIPP
Savings
2016/17
Total
Budgets
11
West Norfolk CCG QIPP Plan 2016/17: Top 10 Schemes APPENDIX B
2016/17
Value
£m H/M/L
Remove BCF contribution to
Social CareTransactional BCF 1.95 Recurrent Medium
Acute productivity metrics TransactionalAcute
services1.16 Recurrent High
Prescribing Quality Scheme Transactional Prescribing 0.81 Recurrent Medium
CHC & non-CHC Individual
Patient PlacementsTransactional
Continuing
Care services0.60 Recurrent Low
Data challenge - Acute providers TransactionalAcute
services0.60 Recurrent Medium
Care Home matrons TransformationalAcute
services0.59 Recurrent Medium
Strategic Review of Independent
Sector ContractingTransactional
Acute
services0.55 Recurrent High
Continuing Healthcare Discharge
to Assess PathwayTransactional
Continuing
Care services0.43 Recurrent Low
Prior Approval (Procedures of
Limited Clinical Effectiveness)Transactional
Acute
services0.41 Recurrent Medium
Lucentis at Outpatient price TransactionalAcute
services0.41 Recurrent Medium
Total of Top 10 Schemes 7.50
To continue the work commenced in 2015/16 to review high cost packages for individual
patients. 16/17 saving includes full year effect of 15/16 work for LD patients and also reflects
additional work planned for mental health patients and those with physical disabilities.
New Discharge to Assess procedure from Jan 16 for patients at QEH which is intended to
speed discharge, reduce excess bed-days, and ultimately reduce the number of CHC
packages.
The CCG is expecting to pay for Lucentis injections in 2016/17 as an outpatient procedure
rather than a day-case, reflecting practice in other areas.
Summary of QIPP SchemesArea of
Spend
Recurrent or
non-rec
scheme
2016/17 Risk
Rating Short descriptor of schemeTransactional /
Transformational
All acute contracts to include productivity metrics such as first to follow-up outpatient ratios
and consultant to consultant referral caps, therefore reducing spend on outpatient
attendances
In 2015/16 the CCG's S75 BCF agreement included a £1.9m transfer to Norfolk County Council
(NCC) in respect of the protection of social care services. The CCG has written to NCC
confirming that it will no longer be able to maintain this funding support; instead the
minimum BCF funding requirement will be met by directing further CCG spend via the BCF.
Individual action plans are being agreed with practices before 31/3/16 to ensure all medicines
are optimised. This potentially will improve patient care, avoid admission , save money and
avoid adverse drug reactions. The work is supported by an agreed Prescribing Quality Scheme
that focuses on early adoption of changes in prescribing.
To make sure that the Independent Sector capacity is reviewed and managed more robustly in
2016/17 to remove the over-performance seen in 2015/16.
Further reductions in spend on Procedures of Limited Clinical Effectiveness (PoLCE) as a result
of continual review of commissioning policies; to apply to all acute providers.
In 2015/16 the CCG has piloted an enhanced claims process via NELCSU. This is expected to
continue into 2016/17 with a wider range of providers thus maximising the benefit from
contractual data queries and challenges.
In 2015/16 a group of practices piloted a Care Homes Matron scheme. This has been evaluated
and proven to be successful and therefore is to be rolled out further in 2016/17. Anticipated
reductions in admissions from Care Homes total 396.
12
West Norfolk CCG QIPP Plan 2016/17: Other Schemes APPENDIX C
2016/17
Value
£m H/M/L
Virtual Ward enhancement
/ Rapid ResponseTransformational Acute services 0.40 Recurrent High
Reducing Variation in
Referral BehaviourTransactional Acute services 0.40 Recurrent Medium
Continuing Healthcare
OptimisationTransactional
Continuing
Care services0.35 Recurrent Low
Palliative Care contract
(avoiding admissions at the
end of life)
Transformational Acute services 0.34 Recurrent Medium
Dermatology Review Transformational Acute services 0.32 Recurrent Medium
Rapid Assessment in
hospitalTransformational Acute services 0.25 Recurrent High
Pain Management Pathway
RedesignTransformational Acute services 0.25 Recurrent Medium
Prior Approval Process - Full
Year Effect of 15/16Transactional Acute services 0.24 Recurrent Low
Review LD In-Patient
ServicesTransactional
Mental Health
Services0.23 Recurrent Medium
Biosimilar adoption - gain
shareTransactional Acute services 0.17 Recurrent Medium
QEH Psychology provision Transactional Acute services 0.11 Recurrent Medium
Schemes under £100k Transactional 0.13 Recurrent Low
Total 3.17
GRAND TOTAL ALL SCHEMES 10.67
The CCG is an outlier in Dermatology spend and so the CCG is reviewing the pattern of
provision to identify how services can be provided locally at a lower cost
Procurement of new Integrated Palliative Care Service to take effect from early 2016/17. This
brings together disparate acute and community providers into a single integrated pathway
and is expected to reduce the number of patients who enter acute care at the end of life.
There is a Rapid Assessment Team (RATs) in place at the QEH. This scheme is to enhance and
extend the hours of the service, including weekend cover, to divert appropriate A&E patients
from being admitted to hospital.
There are a number of community-based services for admission avoidance. These can be
enhanced by the establishment of a rapid response service as part of a wider review of the
Virtual Ward, Reablement Service and associated provision.
Misc minor schemes
Full year benefit of new policy and process introduced in 2015/16 to restrict Procedures of
Limited Clinical Effectiveness.
A Norfolk-wide contract for LD Assessment and Treatment beds ends on 31/3/16. New
rebased contract to be awarded at a lower value for WNCCG recognising lower usage
Review of services charged under a block arrangement over and above tariff charges.
The CCG and QEH are investigating changes to the prescribing of non-tariff drugs under a gain-
share agreement so as to reduce the pass-through costs to the CCG.
The CCG is an outlier in spend on Pain Management services, so the pathway is being
reviewed and redefined to identify how services can be provided at a lower cost.
Short descriptor of scheme
Full year benefit of Complex Cases Review Panel process introduced in early 2015.
There is considerable variation in referral patterns across practices in West Norfolk when
compared against Right Care benchmarking and prevalence data. Continuing work with
practices will reduce the variation in referrals and therefore in Outpatient attendances, via a
combination of peer review, information provision, clinical education, and other tools.
Summary of QIPP
Schemes
Transactional /
Transformational
Area of
Spend
Recurrent or
non-rec
scheme
2016/17 Risk
Rating