Date post: | 06-Mar-2018 |
Category: |
Documents |
Upload: | trinhkhuong |
View: | 217 times |
Download: | 1 times |
Financial feasibility of fast ypyrolysis plants in SW Oregon
i f t idusing forest residues as feedstockeedstoc
Colin B. SorensonThe University of Montanay
Bureau of Business and Economic [email protected]
Western Forest Economists meeting – May 11, 2011
OverviewOverview
MotivationMotivationBackgroundAssumptionsFinancial Analysis MethodFinancial Analysis MethodFinancial Performance & SensitivityConclusions
Forest biomass – waste product or energy feedstock?
Photo: RMRS
Handling optionsPile and burn or seek value-added end usesOpen burning – emissions concerns and no value recoveredRenewable energy feedstock – carbon neutral/negative, displaces fossil f lfuelsMust be financially feasible
&OR &
Pile and burn
In-woods handling, transport
Energy conversionPhoto: WFES
Pile and burn disposal
Bioenergy Conversion MethodsBioenergy Conversion MethodsBiomass
Thermochemical BiochemicalThermochemical Biochemical
Combustion Gasification Pyrolysis Fermentation Anaerobic Digestion
Heat,Steam,
Producer gas,
Bio-oil, Biochar, Ethanol Biogas
Electricity Electricity Syngas
Source: McKendry 2002
Fast PyrolysisFast Pyrolysis
Rapid thermal degradation of biomass in theRapid thermal degradation of biomass in the absence of oxygen
Bio-oil Biochar SyngasBio oil Biochar y g
Renewable Oil International® LLCFast Pyrolysis Process
Gas & VaporGas & Vapor
y y
Heat CarrierBiomass
CharCharMoving Bed ReactorReactor
Study region for mobile and fixed l ipyrolysis
Source: Anderson 2010
Assumptions for both plantsAssumptions for both plantsProducts: 57% bio-oil, 27% biochar, 15% syngas, 1% tar
75% of thermal process energy supplied by syngas
60% capital investment borrowed @ 9% for 7 years
Straight line depreciation
Standard federal income taxes and Oregon excise taxes
Energy content of #2 fuel oil = 0.139 MMBtu/gal
Energy content of bio-oil = 0.08 MMBtu/gal
$Price #2 fuel oil = $2.64/gal (2-yr avg price Sep07-Aug09)(Latest available weekly price from EIA = $3.09 as of Mar 2011)
P i bi il (i l 10% di t) $1 36/ lPrice bio-oil (incl. 10% discount) = $1.36/gal
Price bio-char = $136/ton
Contrasting assumptionsContrasting assumptionsMobile 50 BDTPD Fixed 200 BDTPD
$3.46 million initial capital investmentOperates12 hours per day
$24.26 million initial capital investment24-hour continuous operation
87.5% utilization rate6 FTE employeesDelivered feedstock $20/BDT
90% utilization rate17.5 FTE employeesDelivered feedstock $45/BDTDelivered feedstock $20/BDT
Consumes 7,128 BDT/yrAnnual Production
780 642 gallons bio oil
Delivered feedstock $45/BDTConsumes 65,700 BDT/yrAnnual Production
8 32 million gallons bio oil780,642 gallons bio-oil2,138 tons biochar79 tons tar
All electrical process energy
8.32 million gallons bio-oil 19,710 tons biochar730 tons tar
All electrical process energyAll electrical process energy supplied by bio-oilUnit moves 2 times per year
All electrical process energy purchased from grid
Financial analysis methodFinancial analysis method
Discounted cash flow analysisDiscounted cash flow analysis7% real (net of inflation) discount rateNPV of after tax cash flow and IRRNPV of after tax cash flow and IRR determined for each plantSensitivity analyses for multiple cost andSensitivity analyses for multiple cost and revenue parametersCompare tradeoffs between mobile and fixedCompare tradeoffs between mobile and fixed
Baseline Financial Performance
Mobile FixedNPV ($1000s) 36 9,681
IRR (%) 7.4 20.9
Financial Performance Sensitivity Analysis
Mobile plant sensitivity to selected variable cost parameters
Breakeven labor cost is $29.84/hr/emp.
$200 000
$300,000
$400,000
$500,000
lows
Labor costs
Breakeven feedstock cost is $21.43/BDT
‐$100 000
$0
$100,000
$200,000
fter tax cash fl
Feedstock Cost
‐$400,000
‐$300,000
‐$200,000
$100,000
NPV
of af
Bio‐oil delivery cost to market (Portland, OR)
‐$500,000
‐30% ‐10% Base case +10% +30%
Change in parameter level
Biochar delivery cost to market
Financial Performance S iti it A l iSensitivity AnalysisMobile plant sensitivity to bio-oil and biochar prices
$1 000 000
$2,000,000
$3,000,000
flows
#2 fuel oil and
‐$1,000,000
$0
$1,000,000
er ta
x cash f and
bio‐oil price
‐$3,000,000
‐$2,000,000
, ,
NPV
of aft
Bio‐char price
‐$4,000,000
‐50% ‐20% ‐10% Base case
+10% +20% +50%Break-even bio-oil price is $1.35/gal
Break-even bio-char Change in parameter level price is $132/ton
Financial Performance Sensitivity AnalysisFixed plant sensitivity to selected variable cost parameters
Breakeven labor cost is $92.93/hr/emp.$12,000,000
$13,000,000
$14,000,000
ows
Feedstock Cost
Breakeven feedstock cost is $80.69/BDT
$9 000 000
$10,000,000
$11,000,000
r tax cash flo
Labor costs
$7,000,000
$8,000,000
$9,000,000
NPV
of afte
Bio‐oil delivery cost to market (Portland, OR)
$5,000,000
$6,000,000
‐30% ‐10% Base case
+10% +30%
Biochar delivery cost to market
caseChange in parameter level
Financial Performance Sensitivity Analysis
Fixed plant sensitivity to bio-oil and biochar prices
$
$30,000,000
$40,000,000
flows ($)
#2 fuel oil and
$0
$10,000,000
$20,000,000
er tax cash f
bio‐oil price
$20 000 000
‐$10,000,000
$0
NPV
of afte
Bio‐char price
‐$20,000,000
‐50% ‐20% ‐10% Base case
+10% +20% +50%
N
h i l l
Break-even bio-oil price is $1.08/gal
Break-even bio-charChange in parameter level
Break even bio char price is $16/ton
Additional breakeven levelsAdditional breakeven levels
Mobile FixedMobile FixedScheduled operating days
322 223y
Utilization rate (%) 86.8 55.0
Initial capital investment 3 51 47 23Initial capital investment ($millions)
3.51 47.23
ConclusionsConclusions
Both mobile and fixed pyrolysis can be profitableBoth mobile and fixed pyrolysis can be profitable Fixed plant exhibits superior returns under each financial performance measurepTradeoffs
Mobile plant has lower feedstock cost and ability to t ff idoperate off-grid
Fixed plant exhibits economies of scale, especially with respect to labor costsBoth plants depend on developed markets for both bio-oil and biochar to be profitable
Contact Information
Colin SorensonThe University of MontanayBureau of Business and Economic Research406-243-5113colin sorenson@business umt [email protected]