+ All Categories
Home > Business > Financial Statement Analysis

Financial Statement Analysis

Date post: 24-May-2015
Category:
Upload: hunjoo14
View: 501 times
Download: 1 times
Share this document with a friend
Description:
Financial Statement Analysis
Popular Tags:
58
Copyright © 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall. Chapter 15 1
Transcript
Page 1: Financial Statement Analysis

Copyright © 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall.

Chapter 15

1

Page 2: Financial Statement Analysis

Copyright © 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall.2

Perform a horizontal analysis of financial statements

Perform a vertical analysis of financial statements

Prepare and use common-size financial statements

Compute and evaluate the standard financial ratios

Page 3: Financial Statement Analysis

Copyright © 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall.

To make informed decisions about a companyHelpful in managing the companyComparison with competitionCharting a company’s progress, measure performanceEstablish financial healthUsed for investment decisions

Generally based on comparative financial dataFrom one year to the nextWith a competing companyWith the industry as a whole.

3

Page 4: Financial Statement Analysis

Copyright © 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall.

Three main ways to analyze financial statementsHorizontal analysis

Year-to-year comparison

Vertical analysisCompare different companies

Using industry averagesCompare company’s performance against the industry averages

4

Page 5: Financial Statement Analysis

Copyright © 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall.

Perform a horizontal analysis of financial statements

11

5

Page 6: Financial Statement Analysis

Copyright © 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall.

The study of percentage changes in comparative statements

Compute dollar changes

Compute percentage changes

6

Page 7: Financial Statement Analysis

Copyright © 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall.

Step 1

Step 27

Page 8: Financial Statement Analysis

Copyright © 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall.8

Page 9: Financial Statement Analysis

Copyright © 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall.

Form of horizontal analysisIndicates business directionHow have things changed over the years?

Select a period of three to five yearsBase year, earliest year, is selected and set equal to 100%Subsequent years expressed as a percentage of the base period

9

Page 10: Financial Statement Analysis

Copyright © 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall.

Data for Mariner Designs, Inc., follow:

1. Prepare a horizontal analysis of the comparative income statement of Mariner Designs, Inc. Round percentage changes to one decimal place.

10

MARINER DESIGNS, INC.

Comparative Income Statement

Years Ended December 31, 2012 and 2011

2011 2012

Net sales revenue $ 431,000 $ 372,350

Expenses:

Cost of goods sold $ 200,000 $ 187,550

Selling and general expenses 99,000 91,050

Other expense 8,350 6,850

Total expenses $ 307,350 $ 285,450

Net income $ 123,650 $ 86,900

Page 11: Financial Statement Analysis

Copyright © 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall.11

MARINER DESIGNS, INC.

Comparative Income Statement

Years Ended December 31, 2012 and 2011

Increase (Decrease)

2011 2012 Amount Percent

Net sales revenue $ 431,000 $ 372,350 $ 58,650 15.8 %

Expenses:

Cost of goods sold $ 200,000 $ 187,550 $ 12,450 6.6 %

Selling and general expenses

99,000 91,050 7,950 8.7 %

Other expense 8,350 6,850 1,500 21.9 %

Total expenses $ 307,350 $ 285,450 21,900 7.7 %

Net income $ 123,650 $ 86,900 $ 36,750 42.3 %

Page 12: Financial Statement Analysis

Copyright © 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall.

Data for Mariner Designs, Inc., follow:

2. Why did 2012 net income increase by a higher percentage than net sales revenue?

Revenues increase at a higher rate than total expenses.

12

Page 13: Financial Statement Analysis

Copyright © 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall.

Perform a vertical analysis of financial statements

22

13

Page 14: Financial Statement Analysis

Copyright © 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall.

Shows relationship of each item to a base amount on financial statements

Income statement–each item expressed as percentage of net sales

Balance sheet–each item expressed as percentage of total assets or total liabilities and equity.

Remember total assets = total liabilities and equity

14

Page 15: Financial Statement Analysis

Copyright © 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall.

Base amount

Percentage of the base amount15

Page 16: Financial Statement Analysis

Copyright © 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall.

Base amount

Percentage of base

16

Page 17: Financial Statement Analysis

Copyright © 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall.

Tri-State Optical Company reported the following amounts on its balance sheet at December 31, 2012 and 2011:

Prepare a vertical analysis of Tri-State assets for 2012 and 2011.

17

2012 2011

Cash and receivables $ 54,530 $ 46,860

Inventory 42,435 32,670

Property, plant, and equipment, net 108,035 85,470

Total assets $ 205,000 $ 165,000

2012 % oftotal

2011 % oftotal

Cash and receivables $ 54,530 $ 46,860

Inventory 42,435 32,670

Property, plant, and equipment, net

108,035 85,470

Total assets $ 205,000 $ 165,000

26.620.752.7

100.0

28.419.851.8

100.0

Page 18: Financial Statement Analysis

Copyright © 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall.

Prepare and use common-size financial statements

33

18

Page 19: Financial Statement Analysis

Copyright © 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall.

Common-size statements compare one company to another

Report only percentages (same as vertical analysis)Remove dollar value bias

19

Page 20: Financial Statement Analysis

Copyright © 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall.

Comparing a company with another leading companyTwo main types:

Against a key competitorAgainst the industry average

20

Page 21: Financial Statement Analysis

Copyright © 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall.

Data for Martinez, Inc., and Rosado, Corp., follow:

1. Prepare common-size income statements.

21

Martinez Rosado

Net sales $ 10,600 $ 18,600

Cost of goods sold 6,455 13,522

Other expenses 3,541 4,185

Net income $ 604 $ 893

Martinez Rosado

Net sales 100 % 100 %

Cost of goods sold 60.9 % 72.7 %

Other expenses 33.4 % 22.5 %

Net income 5.7 % 4.8 %

Page 22: Financial Statement Analysis

Copyright © 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall.

(Continued)

2. Which company earns more net income?

3. Which company’s net income is a higher percentage of its net sales?

22

Martinez Rosado

Net sales 100 % 100 %

Cost of goods sold 60.9 % 72.7 %

Other expenses 33.4 % 22.5 %

Net income 5.7 % 4.8 %

Rosado

Martinez

Page 23: Financial Statement Analysis

Copyright © 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall.

Compute and evaluate the standard financial ratios

44

23

Page 24: Financial Statement Analysis

Copyright © 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall.

No single ratio tells the whole pictureDifferent ratios explain different aspects Types:

Evaluating ability to pay current liabilitiesEvaluating ability to sell inventory and collect receivablesEvaluating ability to pay long-term debtEvaluating profitabilityEvaluating stock as an investment

24

Page 25: Financial Statement Analysis

Copyright © 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall.

Working capitalMeasures ability to meet short-term obligations

Working capital = Current assets – Current liabilitiesCurrent ratio

Proportion of current assets to current liabilities

Acceptable current ratio 1.50 25

Current assets Current liabilities

Current ratio =

Page 26: Financial Statement Analysis

Copyright © 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall.

Acid-test ratioTells if company could pay all its current liabilities immediately

Normal range 0.20 to 1.00 depending upon industry

26

Cash + Short-term investments + Net current receivables Current liabilities

Acid-test Ratio =

Page 27: Financial Statement Analysis

Copyright © 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall.

Inventory turnover ratioMeasures number of times a company sells inventory during a yearHigh rate indicates ease in sellingLow rate indicates difficulty in selling

Formula

27

Inventory turnover =Cost of goods soldAverage inventory

Page 28: Financial Statement Analysis

Copyright © 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall.

Days in inventory ratioMeasures the average number of days inventory is held by the company

Formula

28

Days in inventory =365 days

Inventory turnover ratio

Page 29: Financial Statement Analysis

Copyright © 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall.

Gross profit percentageMeasures the profitability of each net sales dollar

Formula

29

Gross profit percentage =Gross profit

Net sales

Page 30: Financial Statement Analysis

Copyright © 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall.

Accounts receivable turnover ratioMeasures ability to collect cash from credit customers

Formula

30

Accounts receivable turnover =Net credit sales

Average net accounts receivable

Page 31: Financial Statement Analysis

Copyright © 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall.

Days’ sales in receivables ratioMeasures ability to collect receivables

Formula

31

Days’ sales in average accounts = receivable

365 daysAccounts receivable

turnover ratio

Page 32: Financial Statement Analysis

Copyright © 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall.

Debt ratioShows portion of assets financed with debtThe higher the ratio, the higher the risk

Formula

Average debt ratio ranges from 57% to 67% 32

Debt ratio = Total liabilitiesTotal assets

Page 33: Financial Statement Analysis

Copyright © 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall.

Debt to equity ratio The proportion of total liabilities to the proportion of total equity that is financing the company’s assets

Formula

33

Debt to equity =Total liabilities

Total equity

Page 34: Financial Statement Analysis

Copyright © 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall.

Times-interest-earned ratioMeasures number of times income can cover interest expenseHigh ratio indicates ease in paying interest

Formula

34

Times-interest earned ratio

=Earnings Before Interest and Taxes

Interest expense

Page 35: Financial Statement Analysis

Copyright © 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall.

Return on net salesPercent of each sales dollar earned as net income

Formula

35

Rate of returnon net sales

=Net income

Net sales

Page 36: Financial Statement Analysis

Copyright © 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall.

Return on total assetsMeasures success in using assets to earn a profit

Formula

36

Rate of returnon total assets

= Net income + Interest expenseAverage total assets

Page 37: Financial Statement Analysis

Copyright © 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall.

Asset turnover ratioMeasures the amount of net sales generated for each average dollar of total assets invested

Formula

37

Asset turnover ratio =Net sales

Average total assets

Page 38: Financial Statement Analysis

Copyright © 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall.

Return on common stockholders’ equityHow much income is earned for each dollar invested by common shareholders

Formula

38

Rate of return on commonstockholders’ equity

= Net income – Preferred dividendsAverage common stockholders’ equity

Page 39: Financial Statement Analysis

Copyright © 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall.

Trading on the equityCompany borrows at a lower rate, then invests the money to earn a higher rateReturn on Equity > Return on Assets

Increases profits during goods timesCompounds losses during bad times

39

Page 40: Financial Statement Analysis

Copyright © 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall.

Earnings per shareNet income earned for each share of outstanding common stockOutstanding stock = Issued stock – Treasury stock

Formula

40

Earnings per shareof common stock

=Net income – Preferred Dividends

Number of shares of common stock outstanding

Page 41: Financial Statement Analysis

Copyright © 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall.

Price/earnings ratio (P/E)Market price compared to earnings per share

Formula

41

P/E ratio = Market price per share of common stockEarnings per share

Page 42: Financial Statement Analysis

Copyright © 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall.

Dividend yieldPercentage of market value that is returned as dividends

Formula

42

Dividend yield on common stock

=Annual dividends per share of common stock

Market price per share of common stock

Page 43: Financial Statement Analysis

Copyright © 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall.

Dividend PayoutThe ratio of annual dividends declared relative to the earnings per share of the company

Formula

43

Dividend Payout =Annual dividends per share

Earnings per share

Page 44: Financial Statement Analysis

Copyright © 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall.

Book valueCommon equity per shareSome argue its relevance to investors

Formula

44

Book value per share of common stock

= Total stockholders’ equity – Preferred equity

Number of shares of common stock outstanding

Page 45: Financial Statement Analysis

Copyright © 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall.

Win’s Companies, a home improvement store chain, reported the following summarized figures:

45

Page 46: Financial Statement Analysis

Copyright © 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall.

(Continued)

1.Compute Win’s Companies’ current ratio at May 31, 2012 and 2011.

2. Did Win’s Companies’ current ratio improve, deteriorate, or hold steady during 2012?

46

Current assets Current liabilities

Current ratio =

2012 - $ 54,300,000/$ 33,000,000 = 1.652011 - $ 25,200,000/$ 13,100,000 = 1.92

Win’s Companies current ratio deteriorated.

Page 47: Financial Statement Analysis

Copyright © 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall.

Use the Win’s Companies data in Short Exercise 15-5 to complete the following requirements.

1.Compute the rate of inventory turnover, days in inventory, and gross profit percentage for 2012.

47

Inventory turnover =Cost of goods soldAverage inventory

Days in inventory =365 days

Inventory turnover ratio

Gross profit percentage =Gross profit

Net sales

$ 28,400,000/($6,900,000 + $8,200,000)/2 = 3.76

365/3.76 = 97 days

$21,800,000/$50,200,000 = 43.4 %

Page 48: Financial Statement Analysis

Copyright © 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall.

(Continued)

2. Compute days’ sales in average receivables during 2012. Round dollar amounts to three decimal places.

48

365/($ 50,200,000/($7,400,000 + $5,300,000)/2 ) = 46 days

Days’ sales in average accounts = receivable

365 daysAccounts receivable

turnover ratio

Accounts receivable turnover =Net credit sales

Average net accounts receivable

Page 49: Financial Statement Analysis

Copyright © 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall.

Use the financial statements of Win’s Companies in Short Exercise 15-5.

1.Compute the debt ratio and the debt to equity ratio at May 31, 2012.

2. Is Win’s ability to pay its liabilities strong or weak? Explain your reasoning.

49

Debt ratio = Total liabilitiesTotal assets

Debt to equity =Total liabilities

Total equity

$ 45,300,000 / $ 88,300,000 = 51.3

$ 45,300,000 / $ 43,000,000 = 1.05

The company’s ability to pay its liabilities is strong since the debt ratio is low.

Page 50: Financial Statement Analysis

Copyright © 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall.

Use the financial statements of Win’s Companies in Short Exercise 15-5 to complete the following profitability measures for 2012.1. Compute the rate of return on net sales.

2. Compute the rate of return on total assets.

3. Compute the asset turnover ratio.

50

Rate of returnon net sales

= Net incomeNet sales

$ 15,500,000 / $ 50,200,000 = 30.9%

Rate of returnon total assets

= Net income + Interest expenseAverage total assets

$ 15,500,000 + 500,000 / ($ 88,300,000 + $ 51,200,000)/2 = 22.9%

Asset turnover ratio =Net sales

Average total assets

$ 50,200,000 / ($ 88,300,000 + $ 51,200,000)/2 = 0.72

Page 51: Financial Statement Analysis

Copyright © 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall.

(Continued)

4. Compute the rate of return on common stockholders’ equity.

5. Are these rates of return strong or weak? Explain your reasoning.

51

Rate of return on commonstockholders’ equity

= Net income – Preferred dividendsAverage common stockholders’ equity

$ 15,500,000 – 0 / ($ 43,000,000 + $ 27,500,000) /2 = 44.0 %

These rates of return are strong considering that average companies present much lower rates of return.

Page 52: Financial Statement Analysis

Copyright © 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall.

Use the financial statements of Win’s Companies in Short Exercise 15-5. Win’s has 500,000 common shares outstanding during 2012.1.Compute earnings per share (EPS) for Win’s. Round to the nearest cent.

2. Compute Win’s Companies’ price/earnings ratio. The market price per share of Win’s stock is $68.50.

52

Earnings per shareof common stock

=Net income – Preferred Dividends

Number of shares of common stock outstanding

$ 15,500,000 – 0/500,000 = $31.00

P/E ratio = Market price per share of common stockEarnings per share

$68.50/$31.00 = 2.2 times

Page 53: Financial Statement Analysis

Copyright © 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall.

Analysts look for red flags that may signal financial troubleRecent accounting scandals highlight the importance of:

Movement of sales, inventory, and receivablesEarnings problemsDecreased cash flowToo much debtInability to collect receivablesBuildup of inventory

53

Page 54: Financial Statement Analysis

Copyright © 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall.

Horizontal analysis allows a company to see the percentage change from one year to the next.Trend analysis can show the percentage change from a base year forward to determine whether the trend in net sales, for example, is positive or negative.Vertical analysis shows the relationship of each item on the statement to a base amount. The base amount is net sales on the income statement and total assets on the balance sheet. All other items are reported as a percentage of the 100% net sales line on the income statement or the 100% total assets line on the balance sheet.

54

Page 55: Financial Statement Analysis

Copyright © 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall.

Vertical analysis can be used to prepare common-size statements to compare companies against each other. We can benchmark (measure) a company against a key competitor or measure a company against the industry average.Ratio analysis is used to analyze financial statement data. Ratios provide information about a company’s performance and are best used to measure a company against other firms in the same industry and to denote trends within the company.

55

Page 56: Financial Statement Analysis

Copyright © 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall.

Ratios tell users about a company’s liquidity, solvency, profitability, and asset management. No one ratio can provide the whole picture a decision maker needs.

56

Page 57: Financial Statement Analysis

Copyright © 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall.57

Page 58: Financial Statement Analysis

Copyright © 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall.

Copyright

All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording, or otherwise, without the prior written permission of the publisher. Printed in the United States of America.

58


Recommended