+ All Categories
Home > Documents > Financial Viability Model Petro Kok

Financial Viability Model Petro Kok

Date post: 03-Jan-2016
Category:
Upload: martena-burnett
View: 25 times
Download: 3 times
Share this document with a friend
Description:
Financial Viability Model Petro Kok. 21 November 2013. Opening. Viability Model: Purpose. What is the top 5 issues we wanted to measure with this model? Answer: It is a TOOL to put up flags. Not the Alpha and Omega. It doesn't make a decision. Viability Model: Purpose. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Popular Tags:
33
Financial Viability Model Petro Kok 21 November 2013
Transcript
Page 1: Financial Viability Model Petro  Kok

Financial Viability Model Petro Kok

21 November 2013

Page 2: Financial Viability Model Petro  Kok

Opening

G R E E T I N G S !You've received a special delivery

from Antoinette & Petro.

C L I C K B E LO W T O V I E W I T:http://www.jibjab.com/view/jXF5CftLsRPr9coBrJEG

. . . . . .

Y O U R F R I E N D S AT N W U

2

Page 3: Financial Viability Model Petro  Kok

Viability Model: Purpose

What is the top 5 issues we wanted to measure with this model? Answer:

– It is a TOOL to put up flags. Not the Alpha and Omega. It doesn't make a decision.

3

Page 4: Financial Viability Model Petro  Kok

Viability Model: Purpose

– Show the viability and ineffectiveness of different levels (works together with Staff compliment).

– Put the focus on non-profitability. Remember: Cross Subsidizing

– Helps to answer the "Must or mustn't we?" questions.

– Allocation of Resources

4

Page 5: Financial Viability Model Petro  Kok

Phase 1: Academic ViabilityIncome:Tuition fees

Subsidy (Two years before)(Capped)

Other Income*

Income:Tuition fees

Subsidy (Two years before)(Capped)

Other Income*

Expenses:Operating cost

Personnel cost

Capital expenses

Expenses:Operating cost

Personnel cost

Capital expenses

Faculty Support: Dean’s officeFaculty Support: Dean’s office

Campus SupportCampus Support

Institutional Office SupportInstitutional Office Support

School level(Lowest level)

School level(Lowest level)

Available on School

level

Available on School level

Cost driver:

TIU

Cost driver:

allocation

Cost driv

er:

alloca

tion

Final Oracle data: (ALL SOF’s)

Excluded: - Internal transfer accounts (15307, 28201, 30404) -Residence & catering cost centers

Strategic funds included as allocated.

Other Income*-Investment Income-Services and Entrepreneurial activities-Interdepartmental Income

5

Page 6: Financial Viability Model Petro  Kok

Cost Drivers

• Allocation of Support costs• Process • Some examples of cost drivers used

Support costs to be allocated:

1. Faculty support – Deans Office

6

Page 7: Financial Viability Model Petro  Kok

Cost Drivers: Campus Support

7

Page 8: Financial Viability Model Petro  Kok

Cost Drivers: IO Support

8

Page 9: Financial Viability Model Petro  Kok

Phase 1: Academic Viability - Example

Filter options

Expand and Collapse data

Problem: Users tend to focus on the wrong level.

9

Page 10: Financial Viability Model Petro  Kok

Phase 1: Academic Viability - Example

IDSC can set up different ratios to view in phase 1

10

Page 11: Financial Viability Model Petro  Kok

Phase 1: Academic Viability - Example

11

You can view or create your own charts

Page 12: Financial Viability Model Petro  Kok

Phase 1: Academic Viability

Filter on SOF 1

12

Page 13: Financial Viability Model Petro  Kok

Phase 2: Programme Viability

13

Page 14: Financial Viability Model Petro  Kok

Phase 2: Programme Viability

Phase 1 can indicate which school needs a more detailed investigation

Phase 2: Programme Viability

• Lowest Level: Module level

• Data rolls up to Programme level

Needs of a Dean:• Use the data in Budget committee meetings• See the top 10 best/worst modules in a school • See charts on specific programmes within a school• Importance of the Web report

14

Page 15: Financial Viability Model Petro  Kok

Phase 2: Programme Viability – Data Processing

NB: Module determines where the cost of the department (school) is allocated.

Direct Salaries: The only expense data with information available on module level

All salaries for which we had timesheets and % instruction time, are allocated.

Rest of the direct salary cost without timesheets are not taken into account in phase 2.

For the rest of the cost (not on module level) to be allocated on module level a ratio had to be determined

NEW ACTIVITY**

15

Page 16: Financial Viability Model Petro  Kok

Phase 2: Programme Viability

NEW ACTIVITY**

The direct salary proportions calculated for the module is used to determine the new activity.

Why use direct salary? It is the only cost for which data is available to link it toModule level.

This highlights the importance of TIMESHEETS.

16

Page 17: Financial Viability Model Petro  Kok

Phase 2: Programme Viability (T&L, SOF 1 Only)

From phase 1:

Faculty SupportCampus SupportInstitutional Office Support

From phase 1:

Faculty SupportCampus SupportInstitutional Office Support

Tuition fees (VSS):Module enrolment(Module level)

Tuition fees (VSS):Module enrolment(Module level)

Tuition fees (VSS):Qualification levy (Programme level)

Tuition fees (VSS):Qualification levy (Programme level)

Teaching Input subsidy-current year uncapped(based on 2011 HEMIS)

Teaching Input subsidy-current year uncapped(based on 2011 HEMIS)

Teaching Output subsidy – current year (Programme level)

Teaching Output subsidy – current year (Programme level)

Research Output subsidy - current yearM & D modules only (Programme level)

Research Output subsidy - current yearM & D modules only (Programme level) Direct salaries*

Direct salaries*

Indirect Support salaries = Total (SOF 1) salaries phase 1 - Total direct salaries

Indirect Support salaries = Total (SOF 1) salaries phase 1 - Total direct salaries

Module level(Lowest level)

Module level(Lowest level)

x NEW ACTIVITY**Data available per module

Allocation on Fte’s OR TIU

Data available per module

Allocation on Fte’s OR

TIU

Allocation on Fte’s OR

TIUCTC x %

Instructio

n x %tim

e

on module

x NEW ACTIVITY**

From phase 1:

IndirectOther IncomeOperating costCapital cost

From phase 1:

IndirectOther IncomeOperating costCapital cost x NEW

ACTIVITY**

17

Page 18: Financial Viability Model Petro  Kok

Phase 2: Programme Viability – Cube Report

18

Works almost like a Pivot table in Excel

Page 19: Financial Viability Model Petro  Kok

Phase 2: Programme Viability – Cube Report

19

You can create your own Cube Reports and Save them

Page 20: Financial Viability Model Petro  Kok

Phase 2: Programme Viability – Cube Report

20

Drag and drop functionality

Filter options: Specific School, Module, etc.

Export data to Excel as Pivot table for hand processing

A Chart can be rendered from the data selected in this cube

Page 21: Financial Viability Model Petro  Kok

Phase 2: Programme Viability – Cube Chart

21

Filter options still available.

Cube report and the Cube chart are linked.

Different chart types to choose from

Page 22: Financial Viability Model Petro  Kok

Phase 2: Programme Viability – Cube Report

22

Link demonstrated:

If you ungroup more rows, change filters etc.

Page 23: Financial Viability Model Petro  Kok

Phase 2: Programme Viability

23

The change will automatically be made in the Cube chart

Page 24: Financial Viability Model Petro  Kok

Web Report

• Great summary of the data

• Main report to be used by all users

• Still in process of finalising

• Want to set up a standard report with 10 items for the end user to view at the click of a button

24

Page 25: Financial Viability Model Petro  Kok

Web Report - Example

25

Different sections of Web Report:

1. Important indicators to be shown

Academic Nodes shown depends on filter specified

Page 26: Financial Viability Model Petro  Kok

Web Report - Example

26

2. Numerous charts can be selected to be displayed

Page 27: Financial Viability Model Petro  Kok

Web Report - Example

27

Page 28: Financial Viability Model Petro  Kok

Web Report - Example

28

3. Display Financial and Academic Indicators

Page 29: Financial Viability Model Petro  Kok

Web Report - Set up

29

IDSC enabled users to set up web reports to own liking

Different sections as shown in the example

Page 30: Financial Viability Model Petro  Kok

Way forward

• Buy-in process of Managers• Continuous Intensive training sessions • Feedback from Deans and Campus finance• Finalise web report• Staff Activity

30

Page 31: Financial Viability Model Petro  Kok

Questions?

31

Page 32: Financial Viability Model Petro  Kok

Conclusion

The Viability model is a great management tool.

Thank you IDSC.

You always

CAN (CAN).

32

Page 33: Financial Viability Model Petro  Kok

Thank you

G R E E T I N G S !

Yo u ' v e r e c e i v e d A N O T H E R s p e c i a l d e l i v e r yf r o m A n t o i n e t t e a n d P e t r o .

C L I C K B E L O W T O V I E W I T :h t t p : / / w w w. j i b j a b . c o m / v i e w / J L j A p R W f D V H 5 Q b U Z j N U 1

. . . . . .

Y O U R F R I E N D S AT N W U

THANK YOU

33


Recommended