1
Financing Small Firm Innovation in the United States
Ronald S. Cooper, Ph.DOffice of TechnologyU.S. Small Business Administration
The Small Business InnovationResearch (SBIR) program
and related programs
2
Public innovation programs—U.S.Public innovation programs—U.S.
• “U.S. experience” -- many US experiences: national, state, local-- replicate → models, practices, lessons
• Targeting small firms and individual entrepreneurs:
-- 15% of R&D $, 55% of innovations-- incentive: possibility of high private returns-- risk is manageable, failure is an option
3
SBIR ProgramSBIR Program
I. Structure & operation
II. Evolution and learning:• outreach & links with private $• university research
III. Economic impacts
IV. Lessons learned
4
SBIR programSBIR program
• Enables US small businesses to engage in federally-funded R&D—with potential for commercialization
• Enables/requires federal agencies to utilize the innovation advantages of small firms
• National program, providing $2 billion each year to small businesses for innovation
• Over 5,000 grants to over 1,500 firms each year
5
National policy shiftNational policy shift 1950s, 60s -- Federal role was to support basic
research in Federal labs and large businesses
1970s, 80s -- Policy shift towards: - commercialization of federal R&D - government-industry partnerships - greater role for small business
– “Stevenson-Wydler Act” of 1980
– “University and Small Business Patent Procedure Act” of 1980 (Bayh-Dole Act)
– “Small Business Innovation Development Act” of 1982 established the SBIR program
6
Concern over competitiveness of US industry—productivity
Disconnect between invention and innovation
Economic contextEconomic context
• only 5% inventions in federal labs licensed
• VC industry
• no good “angel” investor networks
• funding gap (“valley of death”) for early- stage innovation
7
Federally Funded Basic
Research Creates New
Ideas Applied Research
&
Innovation
Capital to Develop Ideas
No Capita
l
The Valley of Death Early-Stage Funding Gap
To Innovation
8
Objectives of SBIR program:
Stimulate technological innovation
Use small business to meet federal R&D needs
Increase private-sector commercialization of innovations derived from federal R&D
Small Business Innovation Small Business Innovation Research (SBIR) ProgramResearch (SBIR) Program
9
SBIR’s 3-Phase StructureSBIR’s 3-Phase StructurePHASE I
Feasibility of idea, proof of concept
$100,000 (1 year)
PHASE II Full R&D, prototype $750,000 (2 years) Commercialization plan
“PHASE III” Commercialization stage Use of non-SBIR funds
(private capital or federal follow-on)
10
Small business located in the U.S.
500 or fewer employees
Organized for-profit U.S. business
At least 51% owned and controlled by U.S. citizens (individuals)
Principal Investigator’s primary employment must be with the small business
Research partners are allowed/encouraged (up to 1/3 of Phase I, up to 1/2 of Phase II)
SBIR eligibility requirementsSBIR eligibility requirements
11
Federal agencies with “extramural” research budgets of over $100 million per year must reserve a percentage for small business through the SBIR program.
Amount of R&D budget to be set-aside for SBIR:
1982-86 1987-92 1993-94 1995-96 1997-present1997-present
0.2+% 1.25% 1.5% 2.0% 2.5%2.5%
Source of funds for SBIR:
12
U.S. federally-funded R&DU.S. federally-funded R&DTotal: $85 billion in 2002
Small Business 5%
Big Business 27%
Univ. & Colleges 34%
Non-Profit 7%
Extramural 74%
Federal Labs 27%
$62B
13
Program StructureProgram Structure
Each participating Federal agency administers its own SBIR program– Solicitations (with technology topic areas)
– Proposal review & selection (scientific merit / commercial)
– Highly competitive: 16% of proposals accepted - Phase I ½ of Phase I projects win Phase IIs
SBA has oversight and outreach responsibilities
- Policy directive - Monitoring - National conferences
- Evaluation - Outreach programs - Reporting to Congress and activities
14
• Defense (DOD) 600 • Health (HHS,NIH) 487 • Space (NASA) 110 • Energy (DOE) 95 • Science (NSF) 78 • Agriculture (USDA) 17 • Commerce (DOC) 7 • Education (ED) 7 • Environment (EPA) 6 • Transportation (DOT) 6
SBIR participating agenciesSBIR participating agencies
TOTAL ~ $2 BTOTAL ~ $2 BFY 2004FY 2004
(FY2002)
$ millions SBA (oversight)
15
Project selectionProject selectionIntegrity of selection process—key to program success
1. Independent review panel of experts (volunteer)
2. 3-5 proposals e-mailed to each reviewer
3. Reviewers grade proposals scientific/technical merit commercialization potential
4. Review panel convenes, ranks proposals(1) must fund, (2) award if funds available, (3) X
5. Agency official makes awards [choice]
Balance between very new ideas & commercial viability
16
Key featuresKey features
Grants & contracts not loans, no direct pay-back
truly early-stage, no debt burden
program continues to fund high-risk research (avoids bureaucratic drift towards downstream)
Small business owns intellectual property government must protect IP for 4 years
agency retains royalty-free license for government use only of technical data (IP)
17
SBIR program evolution1982
FederalGovernment
SmallBusinesses
18
SBIR program evolution1982
SmallBusinesses
StateGovernment
Quasi-Government Corporations Economic Development Entities Technology Centers
FederalGovernment
19
Support outreach & assistance programs/initiatives
• Outreach to bring in new firms is needed:
1. to maintain quality of proposals, cutting-edge research
2. to improve geographic dispersion (political support)
• Federal support as catalyst for state/local assistance programs targeting innovation
Survey: “63% of SBIR projects need assistance with commercialization activities”
SBA’s Federal & State Technology Partnership (FAST) program
20
Federal and State Technology Partnership Federal and State Technology Partnership (FAST) Program(FAST) Program
• Purpose: to provide support to state-level organizations that help small businesses in, or interested in, the SBIR program– Mentoring networks: Business advice & counseling
• Matching grants to state-level organizations– 1:2, 1:1 (incentive for states with lower SBIR participation)
– administered by SBA
• Target: All states eligible, one grant per state Governor endorses proposal
• Funding: FY 2001: $3 million, 30 grants (Grant size: $100K) FY 2002: $3 million, 27 grants
FY 2004: $2 million, 10 grants
21
State/regional assistance programsState/regional assistance programs Non-profit org (model: “KTEC” in state of Kansas)
Matching funds established with state govt funding (1:2)
Firms required to find commercial partners
Firms receive funds in installments only when they pass business milestones:• Business plan, management structure, marketing strategy, secure
private risk capital
Assistance also includes: matching with VCs, angel network, business mentors (networks), university research & incubators, export assistance
Conditional loan with payback: • 0 – low interest, pay only if successful
• 5% of sales, - 2-3 times original investment
• Program self-financing after +/- 5 years
22
Modified 3-phase structureModified 3-phase structurePHASE I
Feasibility of idea $100,000 (1 year)
PHASE II Full R&D, prototype $750,000 (2 years) Commercialization plan
PHASE III Commercialization stage Use of non-SBIR funds
(private capital or federal follow-on)
“PHASE IIb” (NSF)≈ $400,000 initially
→ $350,000 only with matching invest.
$700,000 cash
$1,450,000$1,450,000
PrivateInvestor
Connecting with
private sector
investors
23
SBIR program evolution1982
SmallBusinesses
StateGovernment
Quasi-Government Corporations Economic Development Entities Technology Centers
FederalGovernment
Academia University Research Parks Faculty & Graduate Students Technology Incubators Research Foundations
24
Promoting Small Business-University CollaborationPromoting Small Business-University Collaboration
Small Business Technology Transfer Program Small Business Technology Transfer Program (STTR)(STTR)
• Set-aside program to facilitate cooperative R&D between small businesses and U.S. research institutions
• Established 1992, recently extended through 2009
• Similar structure to SBIR, administered by SBIR offices
• Funding: – Set-aside = 0.3 % of extramural R&D →→ $200 million– Agencies (5) with extramural R&D > $1B must participate
• FY2002: 356 Phase I awards 114 Phase II awards
25
STTR - SBIR DifferencesSTTR - SBIR Differences
• STTR requires research institution partner University or college / non-profit research org. / FFRDC
• Research partner share: min.= 30% max.= 60%
• Award always goes to small business
• Requires written agreement allocating IPRs
• Principal Investigator’s primary employment can be with the small business or the research institution
26
SBIR program impactsSBIR program impacts
Enables new startups, spin-offs, is often only source of funding
Induces further entrepreneurial activity (“demonstration effect”)
Enables small firms to develop innovative capacity
Complements private ventures (reduces risk)
“Success rate”: 39% of projects had sales attributable to SBIR (55% had sales or additional investment)
Possible measure: current market value of companies started with SBIR projects
Catalyst for innovation by addressing early stage finance “gap”
27
SBIR addresses innovation finance gapSBIR addresses innovation finance gap
Dimensions of the Gap Public program
1. Information Certification effect, outreach
2. Short Timeframe Awards/grants
28Source: MoneyTree Survey—PricewaterhouseCoopers, Thompson Venture Economics, NVCA.
1.4%
62.7%
19.2%
16.7%
Expansion
Early Stage
Late Stage
Start Up
US Venture Capital InvestmentsUS Venture Capital Investments by Stage, 2002by Stage, 2002
29
US Venture Capital Investments by Stage
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002
Source: MoneyTreeSurvey
Later Stage
Expansion
Early Stage
Startup/Seed
30
SBIR addresses innovation finance gapSBIR addresses innovation finance gap
Dimensions of the Gap Public program
1. Information Certification effect, outreach
2. Short Timeframe Awards/grants
3. Size of financing Small grants (< $1m)
31
US Venture Capital Disbursements by size of financing round
$0
$2
$4
$6
$8
$10
$12
$14
$16
$18
Source: NVCA and Venture Economics, special tabulations.
Mill
ions
of 1
998
dolla
rs
> $10 million
$1-$10 million
< $1 million
32
SBIR addresses innovation finance gapSBIR addresses innovation finance gap
Dimensions of the Gap Public program
4. Few (fad) technologies Wide range of technologies
5. Geographic specialization Broad geographic coverage
1. Information Certification effect, outreach
2. Short Timeframe Awards/grants
3. Size of financing Small grants (< $1m)
33
LessonsLessons learned learned
• There is effective role for government in funding early-stage small-firm innovation; grants and loans
• One program cannot do everything: - use different programs for different stages
• Eligibility: restrict to for-profit small businesses
• Proposal selection: integrity, quality, balance (between very new ideas and commercial feasibility)
• Small firms must own the IP (incentive), public programs must protect it
• Need to design so that it compliments and coordinates with private risk capital (angel, VC, etc.)
34
Lessons learned Lessons learned (cont’d)
• Must have university-specific part of program, or separate (linked) program (like STTR) to deal with IP and promote spin-offs
• Must coordinate with regional/local business assistance programs
• Outreach is needed to maintain program at cutting-edge (new blood)
• Outreach (not quotas) to achieve geographic dispersion--helps create political support
• Program flexibility where possible: local initiative
35
SBIR & STTR ProgramsSBIR & STTR ProgramsOffice of Technology
U.S. Small Business Administration
For more information• Contact individual agency websites• Cross-agency websites:
www.sba.gov/sbirwww.sbirworld.com
Ronald S. Cooper
(202) 205-6455