Finding Common Ground,Honoring the Promises

Presented by: Amber Ebarb (National Congress of American Indians), Clint Bowers (National Indian Education Association), Caitrin Shuy (National Indian Health Board), and Lacy Horn,

Treasurer (Cherokee Nation)

September 4, 2013

AgendaNational Congress of American Indians• Why now is the time to act.• Budget timeline and recent activity.• Sequester’s impact on funding for tribes.• Treaty Promises are Bipartisan• Analysis of Media Stories about Tribes and SequestrationNational Indian Health Board• Impacts on Indian Health ServiceNational Indian Education Association• Impacts on Indian EducationCherokee Nation• How tribes can develop effective sequester impact reports and stories.

Purpose and Upcoming Events

• Tribal Unity Impact Days, September 11-12, 2013 in DC– Tribal Leader Briefing on 9/11 from 9am-noon.

Register, set up meetings with your delegation.• Also, Native American Caucus to hold a

Sequestration Briefing for Hill Staffers

Now is the Time for Tribal Unity in Urging Congress to Honor Treaty Promises

because we are hearing differently from Indian Country:

Cuts to Native staff are simply increasing an unemployment rate that often exceeds 50 percent in some areas. “Many times these staff are the primary breadwinner in the families. So we are taking an independent family and saying, 'No, you're unemployed, and you've become dependent on this other system [federal unemployment benefits].’”

More media and decision-makers must hear about these effects.

A dangerous narrative,

Where are we? …in desperate need of finding common ground.

• FY2013: Starting to see sequestration impacts• FY2014: Different budget frames

• House Budget Resolution and 302(b)s • Senate Budget Resolution and 302(b)s

– Some bills moved despite budget incongruity

Next Steps:– CR is likely; Democrats may seek sequester replacement

for CR votes• Debt ceiling will need to be raised in mid-October• FY2015: FY15 planning has begun

FY2014: Starkly Different Options• House Appropriations Plan

– It leaves overall sequestration in effect for FY14• The House’s topline discretionary cap would be at the FY14 level after

sequestration as called for in the BCA • $966 billion

– It overrides a key provision of the BCA and shifts billions of dollars from domestic programs to defense and security programs• BCA required equal cuts in Defense and non-Defense• It increases defense funding by $47 billion and reduces domestic spending

by the same.• House plan reduces the pressure on conservatives to replace sequestration

with other deficit reduction

• Senate Plan– FY14 spending cap is at the BCA level before sequester, $1.058

trillion.• The gap is over revenue increases versus entitlement changes.

Percent Cut in non-Defense Discretionary compared to FY10, Inflation Adjusted

-20%

-18%

-16%

-14%

-12%

-10%

-8%

-6%

-4%

-2%

0%

-7%

-12%

-18%

1st Cut, Avoiding Shutdown

2nd Cut, Due to BCACaps

3rd Cut, Sequestration

Source: Center on Budget and Policy Priorities

FY2014 House vs. FY2013 excluding sequestration

Financial Services and General Government

Labor, Health and Human Services, Ed

Interior, Environment

State, Foreign Operations

Energy and Water Development

Commerce, Justice, Science

Agriculture

Transportation, HUD*

Legislative Branch

Homeland Security

Defense

Military Construction, Veterans Affairs

-26.1%

-22.2%

-18.5%

-17.9%

-16.0%

-6.5%

-5.9%

-5.3%

-3.6%

-2.1%

-1.0%

2.1%

Source: Center on Budget and Policy Priorities

Sequestration: Tribes Losing Ground Critical Governmental Services

FY 2006 FY 2007 O.P.

FY 2008 FY 2009 FY 2010 FY 2011 O.P.

FY 2012 FY 2013 CR FY 2014 Options

1,700,000

1,800,000

1,900,000

2,000,000

2,100,000

2,200,000

2,300,000

2,400,000

2,500,000

2,600,000

2,700,000

In 1

,000

s of D

olla

rs

HousePres/

Senate

Nomina

l

House: Δ = -9%, -$210 M vs. Senate

Sen: Δ = -3% vs.

FY10

NCAI Analysis, BIA Budget

FY10 Level

Sequestration: Tribes Losing Ground Critical Governmental Services

FY 2006 FY 2007 O.P.

FY 2008 FY 2009 FY 2010 FY 2011 O.P.

FY 2012 FY 2013 CR FY 2014 Options

1,700,000

1,800,000

1,900,000

2,000,000

2,100,000

2,200,000

2,300,000

2,400,000

2,500,000

2,600,000

2,700,000

In 1

,000

s of D

olla

rs

Pres/Senate

Inflation adjusted

House

Nomina

l

Sen Δ = -11% from FY10

House Δ = -19% from FY10

Adjusting for inflation, even the PB/Senate level is lower than FY06 levels

NCAI Analysis, BIA Budget

FY10 Level

FY14 Appropriations Activities• Interior-Environment Bill

– Very contentious, due to environmental policy riders and wildlife protection programs.– House Subcommittee markup held July 23. Full Cmte July 31 Senate will likely release a

draft but not mark it up.• Transportation HUD

– NAHASDA block grant cut from $650M to $600M• Cole’s office said they will work with the Senate side to restore it towards the end of the approps

season.

• House Appropriations Chairman Harold Rogers (R-KY) commented that, "With this action [pulling the T-HUD bill from the floor], the House has declined to proceed on the implementation of the very budget it adopted just three months ago," referring to the House budget resolution written by Congressman Paul Ryan (R-WI). He added, "The House, Senate and White House must come together as soon as possible on a comprehensive compromise that repeals sequestration, takes the nation off this lurching path from fiscal crisis to fiscal crisis, reduces our deficits and debt, and provides a realistic top-line discretionary spending level to fund the government in a responsible and attainable way."

House vs. Senate on Contract Support Costs

• Significantly, the House bill does not include the contract support costs cap language that has been in the bill for about a decade.

• The bill rejects the Administration’s proposal for individually capping contract support costs.

• The bill also does not include the separate account for contract support costs.

Common Ground: Upholding Treaty Promises is Bipartisan• Congressman Simpson (R-ID), Interior Subcommittee Chair: "This bill makes critical investments in Indian County-an area of

strong interest to the bipartisan Members of this subcommittee. Members on both sides of the aisle agree that sequester is having a negative impact on these health accounts, affecting some of the most vulnerable of our Native American brothers and sisters. We're not able to turn off sequester in our bill but we must work together to carry that message to the Budget Committee and hopefully get this resolved.“

• Congressman Don Young (R AK): “I believe very strongly that if you read the Constitution and our agreement with the ‐American Indians and Alaska Natives, we have an obligation…And I don't want to see us balancing the budget on the backs of those we have an obligation to.“

• Congresswoman McCollum (D-MN): While Medicare, Medicaid, etc are protected from sequestration, IHS will be cut. "When it's the morally right thing to do and when the federal government has a legal responsibility through treaties to provide this, to tell Indian Country, ‘you're affected by sequestration, the rest of the United States population is not.' That's morally wrong. A bipartisan group of House members wants to protect Indian Health Services from sequestration . But House leaders say other programs will need to be cut if money is restored to Indian Health Services.

• Senator Murkowski (Appropriations and SCIA): "Self-determined contracts are the core of our nation's federal trust relationship with Indian tribes. …tribes operate the federal programs promised to Indians for the removal of their lands. This is a federal responsibility that exists in strong budget times and, most importantly, in difficult budget times as well .“

• Senator Franken (D-MN): “The severe cuts made to programs that benefit Native American students are a distressing reminder of why we need to replace the entire sequester…. Children in Indian Country are hurting because of the sequester, and it’s only going to get worse if we don’t get something done.”

• Congressman Cole (R-OK): “The cuts in the BIA the Office of Special Trustee are well below the 19% in the entire budget. And I have no doubt if our allocation gets better that those things will be addressed in appropriate fashion as well . So this bill does prioritize and continues in a bipartisan way to prioritize funding in Indian Country and fulfilling our treaty obligations and trust obligations to Native American nations and I’m proud of that and again that wouldn’t have happened without my friend the chairman but it wouldn’t have happened without my friends on the other side of the aisle, who I know care as deeply about this issue as certainly I do.”

Analysis of Media Stories of Tribes and Sequester

NCAI Reviewed 38 Recent News Articles, Radio Segments, and Blogs The stories and articles covered impacts to

tribes in the states below.

News paper71%

Public radio13%

Blog16%

AZ MN SD MT NM OR ND WA WY UT OK ID AK MI SC

9

8

7

5

4 4 4 4

3

2 2 2

1 1 1

Impact Aid/Title

Head Start

Tribal Colleges

BIE

scholarships

IHS

Behav/Mental

Public safety

BIA

Social services

Natural res

child welfare

Housing

Infrastructure

Educ

ation

Hea

lthBI

A/G

over

nmen

tal S

ervi

ces

Infr

astr

18

10

5

2

1

15

5

7

5

4

2

1

4

2

Prog

ram

s/Ar

eas

Themes in StoriesDetailed budget data

Disproportionate federal revenue

General Disparities

Trust/Treaty Promises

Exempting tribal programs

20

16

14

12

7

Programs and Themes Addressed in News Stories

How Tribes Are Implementing Sequester So Far, according to news stories (March-Sept. 2013)

Layoffs

Cutting days/courses

Stopped hiring

Delay Maintenance

Cut Prof Dev or Ex Cur. Activities

Pay cuts/furloughs

Delayed purchases

Used reserves

Closures/ consolidate

Raised deductibles on insurance

11

9

7

7

6

5

5

4

4

3

We walked past the Tuba City High School gym where sun shines through the holes in the ceiling. At the nearby primary school one wing and a cafeteria have already been condemned. That building is in desperate need of new bathrooms and safe playground equipment. But those upgrades will have to wait.

Clearinghouse: http://www.ncai.org/policy-issues/tribal-governance/budget-and-approprations/sequestration

Email aebarb@ncai.org if you would like to add to this.