+ All Categories
Home > Documents > FINDING MEANING IN SOCIAL MEDIA: CONTENT-BASED SOCIAL NETWORK ANALYSIS OF QUITNET TO IDENTIFY NEW...

FINDING MEANING IN SOCIAL MEDIA: CONTENT-BASED SOCIAL NETWORK ANALYSIS OF QUITNET TO IDENTIFY NEW...

Date post: 18-Dec-2015
Category:
Upload: annabella-ross
View: 213 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend
Popular Tags:
23
FINDING MEANING IN SOCIAL MEDIA: CONTENT-BASED SOCIAL NETWORK ANALYSIS OF QUITNET TO IDENTIFY NEW OPPORTUNITIES FOR HEALTH PROMOTION Sahiti Myneni a,b , Nathan Cobb c , Trevor Cohen a a National Center for Cognitive Informatics and Decision Making in Healthcare , UT School of Biomedical Informatics at Houston b Innovations in cancer Prevention Research, School of Public Health, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, TX, USA c The Schroeder Institute for Tobacco Research and
Transcript

FINDING MEANING IN SOCIAL MEDIA: CONTENT-BASED SOCIAL NETWORK ANALYSIS OF QUITNET TO IDENTIFY NEW OPPORTUNITIES FOR

HEALTH PROMOTION

Sahiti Mynenia,b, Nathan Cobbc, Trevor Cohena

a National Center for Cognitive Informatics and Decision Making in Healthcare , UT School of Biomedical Informatics at Houstonb Innovations in cancer Prevention Research, School of Public Health, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, TX, USAc The Schroeder Institute for Tobacco Research and Policy Studies, Washington, DC, USA

2

AGENDAIntroduction & Background

• Health behaviors• Role of social networks• Current state of online social network analysis

Research Methodology

• Qualitative analysis• Automated text analysis• Network analysis

Results

Innovation

Limitations

Conclusions & Implications

3

HEALTH BEHAVIORS

Preventable illness (63% of global deaths)• Tobacco use

• Poor diet

• Physical inactivity

• Harmful alcohol use

Modifiable health behaviors account for 30% of cancer related deaths

CURRENT STATE OF INTERVENTIONS

4

CARROT APPROACHSTICK APPROACH

5

SOCIAL NETWORKS & HEALTH BEHAVIOR CHANGE

Social relationships and health behaviors

(Valente, 2010; Christakis & Fowler, 2008)

• Homophily (McPherson et al., 2001)• Observational learning (Bandura, 1986)• Social support (House, 1981)

Online Social Networks

• Data source AND intervention delivery platforms• Real-time, real-life (Siffman et al., 2010)

6

CONTENT & NETWORKS

Distributional Semantics

• Hyperspace Analogue to Language (HAL) in online social networks (McArthur et al., 2006)

• Structure-free

Semantic Relatedness

• Pathfinder network (Schvaneveldt, 1990)• Content determines structure

Sender ID Receiver ID Message

11 22 Great 1 week of abstinence, keep going, congratulations

22 11 I had a rough day, lots of tension and craving for nicodemon

88 55 I understand what you are going through, please don’t give up

55 22 I extend my hand to you for a smokeless day

66 11 Gaining weight is normal when you quit smoking

New paradigmCommunication

frequency and content

7

Sender ID Receiver ID Message

11 22 Great 1 week of abstinence, keep going, congratulations

22 11 I had a rough day, lots of tension and craving for nicodemon

88 55 I understand what you are going through, please don’t give up

55 22 I extend my hand to you for a smokeless day

66 11 Gaining weight is normal when you quit smoking

Current paradigmCommunication

frequency

ONLINE SOCIAL NETWORK ANALYSIS

8

RESEARCH MATERIAL

QuitNet, an online social network for smoking cessation

• 100,000 new registrants/year • Participation strongly correlated with abstinence (Cobb et al,

2008)

A database of 16,492 de-identified messages between March 1, 2007 and April 30, 2007

QuitNet Messages

Thematic analysis to identify behavioral components

Social network modeling

Content-specific intervention

personalization

RESEARCH STRATEGY

9

Distributional semantics and vector space modeling

10

QUALITATIVE ANALYSIS

100 randomly chosen messages

• Behavioral constructs, context

• Alignment with behavior change theories

• Social Cognitive Theory (Bandura, 1986)

• The Transtheoretical Model of Change

(Prochaska & Velicer, 1997)

• Grounded Theory approach (Strauss & Corbin, 1990)• Open coding• Axial coding• Constant comparison

11

Thanks for hosting the bonfire tonight. I have been dragging around this lawnbag of 750 unsmoked cigarettes, they have just been piling up over the past 25 days.I would like to donate them to the bonfire.

It helped so much to hear from all of you. I have tears of relief right now that I feel in control again

Theme(s): Social

Togetherness, Progress

Theme(s): Social support

Theme(s): Rewards,

Social Togetherness

RESULTS: QUALITATIVE ANALYSIS

AUTOMATED ANALYSIS• Latent Semantic Analysis (LSA) using Semantic

Vectors package (Widdows & Ferraro, 2008)

• LSA derives relatedness measures between terms or passages from unannotated text by representing the terms in a high-dimensional vector space

12

Term vectorsTheme Vectors

TASA corpus

From Qualitative analysis

Pair vectors

Semantic similarity score

QuitNet corpus

Message vectors

sad emotion help

Distributional statistics

RESULTS: AUTOMATED ANALYSIS

#13

Theme-specific similarity score for each pair of QuitNet users

Validation: Five random QuitNet users chosen

• 82 messages, 27 unique users• The messages exchanged were manually coded• Recall~0.75

• messages retrieved/messages discussing theme

• Precision~0.81 • relevant messages retrieved/total messages retrieved

14

CONTENT-BASED NETWORK MODELING

• Users nodes; Communication between users edges

• Statistical threshold to limit the links (Mean+Std Dev)

• Gephi, an open source network analysis and visualization software

User pairs exchanging messages

ReinforcementTH=0.787

Personal ExperienceTH=0.624

1616971 1056108 0.778 0.5171142992 1616971 0.541 0.3991567343 1631267 0.819 0.6241123493 1056108 0.657 0.6441302604 1418369 0.858 0.5881750563 1080691 0.788 0.5361248151 1615961 0.614 0.479

15

RESULTS: CONTENT-SPECIFIC NETWORK MODELS• Network density and structure varied across themes

• High-degree nodes were different

• Clustering of opinion leaders within each network

Reinforcement Support Personal Experience

16

Reinforcement Support Personal Experience

TRIGGER

#Quit #Adhere

17

18

LIMITATIONS

• QuitNet dataset recorded in 2007, limited in size

• Qualitative analysis until thematic saturation

• Evaluation framework can be more robust including multiple users

19

INNOVATION• Facilitates content inclusion in network science

• Effectively merges qualitative, automated, and quantitative methods

• Extends the scalability of qualitative methods

• Demonstrates the translational design of behavior change support interventions

• Provides granular and comprehensive view of human behavior

Connections Content Connections+

Content

20

CONCLUSIONS & NEXT STEPS

• Modifiable health behaviors contribute to the majority of deaths globally

• Online social networks provides global perspective and platform to investigate and intervene

• A “structure plus content” method to understand inter- and intra-individual behavioral intricacies

• Personalized and targeted solutions to initiate or adhere to a positive behavior change

• Translational interventions that harness the power of social relationships

21

ACKNOWLEDGEMENT

• Cancer Prevention Research Institute of Texas, USA (CPRIT)

• Executive committee, mentors, and fellows of CPRIT Innovations Training Grant, School of Public Health, The University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston, TX, USA

• School of Biomedical Informatics

• QuitNet

22

THANK YOU

REFERENCES

23

1) Smith KP, Christakis NA. Social Networks and Health. Annual Review of Sociology. 2008;34:405–29.

2) Cobb NK, Graham AL, Byron, MJ, Niaura RS, Abrams DB. Online social networks and smoking cessation: a sci-entific research agenda. J Med Internet Res. 2011;13(4):e119.

3) Centola D. The spread of behavior in an online social network experiment. Science. 2010;329(5996):1194

4) Christakis NA, Fowler JH. The collective dynamics of smoking in a large social network. New England Journal of Medicine. 2008; 358(21):2249-58.

5) Chen G, Warren J, Riddle P. Semantic Space models for classification of consumer webpages on metadata attributes. J Biomed Inform. 2010;43(5):725-35.

6) Cohen T, Widdows D. Empirical distributional semantics: methods and biomedical applications. J Biomed Inform. 2009;42(2):390–405.


Recommended