Finding the Green ($$$) in Green
Projects
Jeff HughesUNC School of Government
Environmental Finance Center
919.843.4956
www.efc.unc.edu
Water and Wastewater Infrastructure
Serving current “unserved” residents
Serving growth
Regulatory requirements
Modernization/efficiency improvements
Protecting source water
Replacement and rehabilitation
Recommendation 1 The water management and
policy community must redefine “water
infrastructure” as one that integrates built
infrastructure components with the protection and
restoration of its supporting natural watershed
infrastructure and the use of emerging small-scale
water technologies and water management
solutions.
Greening the SRF
20% of ARRA funds
2010-2011 Green Loans must equal or
exceed 20% of USEPA NC Appropriation
The Challenge of Green Loans
1. $2 Million for purchase of land designed to protect source water
2. $1 Million for AMR installation
3. $3 Million solar installation
4. $3 Million in tree planting, green roofs, and impermeable pavement on private land
5. $500,000 to install water efficient fixtures in private residences
6. $500,000 to install water cisterns on private residences or institutions
7. Methane digester that will be owned and operated by a private company at a utility wastewater treatment plant
Project Examples
Falls lake source water protection projects
AMR
Toilet Rebate Program
Methane capture
Raleigh Solar Installations
Upper Neuse Clean Water Initiative
Annual Budget: Over $1.5 million
Revenue Source: Nutrient Impact Fee
38 miles of stream buffer and 3,257
acres in the Upper Neuse Basin as of
January 2009.
Projects are under way to protect another
30 miles of stream buffer and 3,089 acres
of land.
Imagining Other Options
Automated Meter Reading
Water savings
Increased revenue
Staff savings
Higher quality service
Vehicle energy costs
Water savings as water supply
Conservation Supply Curve - Savings at Increasing Cost
$-
$1
$2
$3
$4
$5
- 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45
Savings in Million Gallons per Day
Co
st
$/c
cf Margina l Cost
Average Cost
$2.41/ccf
Slide Source: Tim Skeel, Seattle Public Utilities
Progress “Sunsense” Model
RECs &
Power System Financing
Purchased by
Progress for
$0.18/kWh
20-year contract
Owned by
municipality or
third-party
Several options
including self-
financing or third-
party ownership
Tax
Credits
Accrue to
system owner
Duke “Solar Rooftops” Model
RECs & Power
& Tax Credits System Financing
Owned by Duke
Energy
Paid for by Duke
Energy
Accrue to
Duke Energy
Lease
Payment
Made to property
owner based on
size of system and
kwh generated
Third-Party Ownership
RECs &
Power System Financing
Owned by third-
party developer
Arranged by third-
party developer
from own
reserves or
separate investor
Power sold to
electric utility
RECs sold to
interested buyer
Lease
Payment
Made to
property
owner
Tax
Credits
Accrue to
third-party
developer
Performance Contracting: Option 1
System Financing
Owned by municipality
Installed and maintained
by ESCO
Arranged by municipality
ESCO supplements debt
service if it exceeds
projected utility savings
Accrue to
municipality
RECs & Power
& Tax Credits
ESCO
Loan
or
Debt
Performance Contracting: Option 2
System Financing
Owned by ESCO
Installed and maintained
by ESCO
Arranged by ESCO
ESCO supplements debt
service if it exceeds
projected utility savings
Accrue to ESCO
RECs & Power
& Tax Credits
ESCO
Loan
or
Debt
Raleigh Solar