+ All Categories
Home > Documents > Finhouse – Magus Indexer Summary The charts provide a variety of insights into the nature of the...

Finhouse – Magus Indexer Summary The charts provide a variety of insights into the nature of the...

Date post: 27-Dec-2015
Category:
Upload: berenice-morton
View: 213 times
Download: 1 times
Share this document with a friend
Popular Tags:
29
Finhouse – Magus Indexer Summary The charts provide a variety of insights into the nature of the Finhouse organisation, in respect of its capacity to adapt to a changing environment. These show differences by level and by department. By convention, Level 0 is the most senior level – the Managing Director or CEO. Lower levels do not refer to seniority or size of salary, but reporting distance from level 0. For example, in Finhouse, all Directors are in Level 1, but so is the MD’s PA and two financial specialists who provide advice on actuarial policy. Not all departmental charts are included in this presentation. In polar charts, the bigger the spike, the bigger the problem.
Transcript

Finhouse – Magus Indexer Summary

• The charts provide a variety of insights into the nature of the Finhouse organisation, in respect of its capacity to adapt to a changing environment. These show differences by level and by department.

• By convention, Level 0 is the most senior level – the Managing Director or CEO. Lower levels do not refer to seniority or size of salary, but reporting distance from level 0. For example, in Finhouse, all Directors are in Level 1, but so is the MD’s PA and two financial specialists who provide advice on actuarial policy.

• Not all departmental charts are included in this presentation.

• In polar charts, the bigger the spike, the bigger the problem.

Finhouse – Resilience Index

Note the lower index at lower

levels

Finhouse – Resilience Index Distribution

Note how a group of 17 people provided data that

translates to an almost perfect index

Finhouse – all departments This chart represents an average – whose

data generates a better picture, and

whose a worse picture?

Finhouse – all departments

The view from the top … close to perfection

Finhouse – all departments

Not much different …

Finhouse – all departments

Beginning to break …

Finhouse – all departmentsProblems beginning

to appear …

Finhouse – all departments

Serious problems appearing …

Finhouse – key departments

Most of the Directors are accountants

Finhouse – key departments Note the similar pattern to

Finance / Level 1

Finhouse – key departments Why the difference between two sales

groups

Finhouse – key departments And Own Products Marketing?

Finhouse – key departments What is the problem with EU Sales?

Finhouse – key departments This group in the Call Centre does exactly the

same job as the UK group

Finhouse – key departments Why the difference between two Call Centre groups?

Finhouse – Managers’ questions A mixed result – few extremes

Finhouse – Managers’ workplace contacts

A good result – lots of good visibility

Finhouse – relationships with customers

Even better – good, long-term relationships

Finhouse – approach to changeAlso looking good

Finhouse – first line supervisorsLack of clarity about

role?

Finhouse – appraisal styleMixed, but some shared

accountability …

Finhouse – appraisal focus… but mainly on short term, backward facing

numbers

Finhouse – approach to failuresNot bad, but a little mixed

Finhouse – management accountability

Even more mixed, and more lack of clarity about

roles?

Finhouse – operational decisionsSounds like managers

are not taking on peoples’ decisions …

Finhouse – approach to profitability problems

… until things start to go wrong …

Finhouse – performance measures

… especially with those short term results

Finhouse – senior management style

This is possibly where management gets too

involved


Recommended