+ All Categories
Home > Documents > Finite Element Method-3

Finite Element Method-3

Date post: 02-Jun-2018
Category:
Upload: yakubu-kasimu-galadima
View: 244 times
Download: 1 times
Share this document with a friend

of 54

Transcript
  • 8/10/2019 Finite Element Method-3

    1/54

    Finite

    Element

    MethodBy the Direct Stiffness Method (DSM)

  • 8/10/2019 Finite Element Method-3

    2/54

    General ProcedurePre-processing

    3. Globalisation: therefore, for the element, the global stiffness equation is

    Recall from previous

    lecture

  • 8/10/2019 Finite Element Method-3

    3/54

    General ProcedurePre-processing3. Globalisation: where the global stiffness

    matrix for the element is

    ()

    Recall from

    previous lecture

  • 8/10/2019 Finite Element Method-3

    4/54

    General ProcedurePre-processing3. Globalisation: Now we write the

    global stiffness equation for eachelement

    To achieve this, we first set a tableof values of relevant data as shownbelow

  • 8/10/2019 Finite Element Method-3

    5/54

    General ProcedurePre-processing

    3. Globalisation: Table of values

    () () () 1 1 22 2 33 2 4

    22

    4590135

    2 2 0 2 2

    2 2 12 2

    0.500.5

    0.510.5

    0.500.5

  • 8/10/2019 Finite Element Method-3

    6/54

    General ProcedurePre-processing

    3. Globalisation: Element stiffness matrices.

    For member (1)

    ,

    ,

    ,,

    2

    0.5 0.50.5 0.5

    0.5 0.50.5 0.50.5 0.5

    0.50.5 0.50.5 0.5

    ,

    ,

    ,,

  • 8/10/2019 Finite Element Method-3

    7/54

    General ProcedurePre-processing3. Globalisation: Element stiffness matrices.

    For member (1)

    0.3536 0.3536

    0.3536 0.3536

    0.3536 0.3536

    0.3536 0.35360.3536 0.35360.3536 0.3536 0.3536 0.35360.3536 0.3536

    ,

    ,

    ,,

  • 8/10/2019 Finite Element Method-3

    8/54

    General ProcedurePre-processing

    3. Globalisation: Element stiffness matrices.

    For member (2)

    ,

    ,

    ,

    ,

    0 00 1

    0 00 10 0

    0 10 00 1

    ,

    ,

    ,

    ,

  • 8/10/2019 Finite Element Method-3

    9/54

    General ProcedurePre-processing

    3. Globalisation: Element stiffness matrices.

    For member (3)

    ,,

    ,,

    2

    0.5 0.50.5 0.5

    0.5 0.50.5 0.5

    0.5 0.50.5 0.5 0.5 0.50.5 0.5

    ,,

    ,,

  • 8/10/2019 Finite Element Method-3

    10/54

  • 8/10/2019 Finite Element Method-3

    11/54

    General ProcedurePre-processing

    4.Assembly: Once the globalised

    stiffness equation for each element of

    the given structure is determined, the

    next task is to merge these elements

    stiffness equations into a singlemaster st i ffness equat ion.

  • 8/10/2019 Finite Element Method-3

    12/54

    General ProcedurePre-processing

    4.Assembly: The merging

    operation must satisfy two

    requirements

    Equilibrium of forcesCompatibility of

    displacements

  • 8/10/2019 Finite Element Method-3

    13/54

    General ProcedurePre-processing

    4.AssemblyEquilibrium of forces:This implies

    that the algebraic sum of all externally

    applied forces at a joint are balanced bythe sum of the reactive forces exerted

    by all the members meeting at that

    joint

  • 8/10/2019 Finite Element Method-3

    14/54

    General ProcedurePre-processing

    4.Assembly

    Equilibrium of forces: For example, the

    static equilibrium equation for joint 2 of

    the example truss is given by:

    () + () + ()

  • 8/10/2019 Finite Element Method-3

    15/54

    General ProcedurePre-processing4.Assembly

    Compatibility of displacement: Thismeans that the joint displacement of allmembers meeting at a joint is the same.

    Again as an example, the compatibilityequations for joint 2 of the exampletruss is

    ,() ,() , and ,() ,() ,()

  • 8/10/2019 Finite Element Method-3

    16/54

    General ProcedurePre-processing

    4.Assembly: thus theequilibrium and compatibility

    equations for nodes 1, 2, 3and 4 are:

  • 8/10/2019 Finite Element Method-3

    17/54

    General ProcedurePre-processing4.Assembly:

    1 ()

    () 0

    2 () + () + (),() ,() , and ,() ,() ,()

  • 8/10/2019 Finite Element Method-3

    18/54

    General ProcedurePre-processing

    4.Assembly:

    3 ()

    ()

    0

    4 ()

    ()

    0

  • 8/10/2019 Finite Element Method-3

    19/54

    General ProcedurePre-processing4.Assembly: Thereare basically

    two approaches to theassembly operation.

    A. Manual assembly, and

    B. Computer oriented assemblyapproach.

  • 8/10/2019 Finite Element Method-3

    20/54

    General ProcedurePre-processing

    4.AssemblyA. Manual assembly is suitable

    for hand computation andconsist of two key steps

  • 8/10/2019 Finite Element Method-3

    21/54

    General ProcedurePre-processing

    4.AssemblyA. Manual assembly

    I. Augmentation, andII. merging

  • 8/10/2019 Finite Element Method-3

    22/54

    General ProcedurePre-processing4.Assembly

    A. Manual assemblyI. Augmentation: This is the process of

    expanding the force and displacement

    vectors to an order that covers all degreeof freedom in the structure. This isrequired for compatibility during themerging operation to create the globalsystem stiffness equation.

  • 8/10/2019 Finite Element Method-3

    23/54

    General ProcedurePre-processing

    4.Assembly

    A. Manual assemblyI. Augmentation: since the truss hasa total of eight (8) DoF, theequilibrium equations for each

    element is expanded such that theforce and displacement fieldsbecome vectors containing eightelements each.

  • 8/10/2019 Finite Element Method-3

    24/54

    General ProcedurePre-processing4.Assembly

    A. Manual assembly

    I. Augmentation:the stiffness

    matrix for each element in theexample truss is thus expanded

    to an square matrix

  • 8/10/2019 Finite Element Method-3

    25/54

    General ProcedurePre-processing

    4.Assembly

    A. Manual assembly

    I. Augmentation:consequently, theequilibrium equations for elements (1),(2), (3) and (4) becomes

    ()

    + ()

    + ()

    () + () + () () + () + ()

    ()

    + ()

    + ()

  • 8/10/2019 Finite Element Method-3

    26/54

    General Procedure Pre-processing

    4. Assembly

    A. Manual assembly

    I. Augmentation:Thus, the stiffness equation for member (1)become

    ,()

    ,(),(),()

    ,

    ()

    ,(),(),()

    0.3536 0.35360.3536 0.3536

    0.3536 0.35360.3536 0.3536

    0.3536 0.35360.3536 0.3536

    0.3536 0.35360.3536 0.3536

    0 00 0

    0 00 0

    0 00 0

    0 00 0

    0 00 0

    0 00 00 00 0 0 00 0

    0 00 0

    0 00 00 00 0 0 00 0

    ,

    ,,,

    ,

    ,,,

  • 8/10/2019 Finite Element Method-3

    27/54

    General Procedure Pre-processing

    4. Assembly

    A. Manual assembly

    I. Augmentation:The stiffness equation for member (2)becomes

    ,(),(),()

    ,

    ()

    ,(),(),()

    ,()

    0 00 0

    0 00 0

    0 0

    0 0

    0 0

    0 1

    0 00 0

    0 00 0

    0 0

    0 1

    0 0

    0 00 00 0 0 00 10 00 0

    0 00 0

    0 00 1 0 00 00 00 0

    0 00 0

    ,,,

    ,

    ,,,

    ,

  • 8/10/2019 Finite Element Method-3

    28/54

    General Procedure Pre-processing

    4. Assembly

    A. Manual assembly

    I. Augmentation:And finally the stiffness equation for

    member (3) becomes

    ,(),(),(),(),()

    ,(),(),()

    0 00 0

    0 00 0

    0 00 0

    0.3536 0.35360.3536 0.3536

    0 00 0

    0 00 0

    0 00 0

    0.3536 0.35360.3536 0.3536

    0 0

    0 0

    0 0

    0 00 00 0 0.3536 0.35360.3536 0.3536

    0 0

    0 0

    0 0

    0 00 00 0 0.3536 0.35360.3536 0.3536

    ,,,,,

    ,,,

  • 8/10/2019 Finite Element Method-3

    29/54

    General Procedure Pre-processing

    4. Assembly

    A. Manual assembly

    I. Augmentation:Considering the requirement

    for compatibility of displacement, the

    member identification index can be dropped

    from the equations above.

  • 8/10/2019 Finite Element Method-3

    30/54

    General ProcedurePre-processing

    4.Assembly

    A. Manual assemblyII. Merging:in qualitative sense, this is

    actually the process of reconnecting

    the elements back together. This isachieved by simply superimposing

    the stiffness equations of the

    individual elements. This yields

  • 8/10/2019 Finite Element Method-3

    31/54

    General Procedure Pre-processing

    4. Assembly

    A. Manual assembly

    II. Merging

    ,,,,,,

    ,,

    0.3536 0.3536

    0.3536 0.35360.3536 0.3536

    0.3536 0.35360.3536 0.3536

    0.3536 0.3536

    0.7072 0

    0 1.7072

    0 00 0

    0 00 0

    0 00 1

    0.3536 0.3536

    0.3536 0.35360 00 0

    0 00 1

    0 0

    0 0

    0.3536 0.3536

    0.3536

    0.3536

    0 00 1

    0 00 0

    0 0

    0 0

    0.3536 0.3536

    0.3536 0.3536

    ,,,,,,

    ,,

  • 8/10/2019 Finite Element Method-3

    32/54

    General Procedure Pre-processing

    4. AssemblyA. Manual assembly

    II. Merging: where the global system stiffness matrix is given by

    0.3536 0.3536

    0.3536 0.3536

    0.3536 0.3536

    0.3536 0.3536

    0.3536

    0.35360.3536 0.3536 0.7072 00 1.7072

    0 00 0

    0 00 0

    0 00 1

    0.3536 0.35360.3536 0.35360 0

    0 0

    0 0

    0 10 0

    0 0

    0.3536 0.3536

    0.3536 0.3536

    0 0

    0 1

    0 0

    0 00 0

    0 0

    0.3536 0.3536

    0.3536 0.3536

  • 8/10/2019 Finite Element Method-3

    33/54

    General ProcedurePre-processing

    4.Assembly

    B. Computer oriented assembly:

    There are different approaches to thecomputer oriented assembly operation,depending on the complexity of the structureinvolved.

    The simplified assembler as the namesuggest is the easiest assembly procedureand can be adopted where the followingproperties hold true for the DSM

    implementation.

  • 8/10/2019 Finite Element Method-3

    34/54

    General ProcedurePre-processing4.Assembly

    B. Computer oriented assembly:All elements are of the same type. For example, all

    elements are made up of 2-node plane barNumber and configuration of the Degree of Freedom

    for all nodes is the same.

    The sequence of joint numbering proceeds withoutbreaks

    The support conditions are single freedomconstraints: that is, they can be expressed asconstraints on individual degree of freedom.

    The master stiffness matrix is stored a full symmetricmatrix.

  • 8/10/2019 Finite Element Method-3

    35/54

    General ProcedurePre-processing

    4.Assembly

    B. Computer oriented assembly: Other

    assemblers such as the Multi Element Type(MET) assembler and the Multi ElementType and Variable Freedom Configuration(MET-VFC) assembler are higher

    assembling procedures for more complexstructural forms and are beyond the scopeof this module and hence would not becovered here.

  • 8/10/2019 Finite Element Method-3

    36/54

    General ProcedurePre-processing

    4.Assembly

    B. Computer oriented assembly:in the simplified assembler procedure,

    instead of the stiffness equation being

    augmented, the entries from the elementsstiffness matrix are mapped directly unto

    the global system stiffness matrix by the

    use of Freedom Pointers

  • 8/10/2019 Finite Element Method-3

    37/54

    General ProcedurePre-processing

    4.Assembly

    B. Computer oriented assembly

    An array of the set of these freedom

    pointers for an element is called the

    Element Freedom Table (EFT).

  • 8/10/2019 Finite Element Method-3

    38/54

    General ProcedurePre-processing

    4.Assembly

    B. Computer oriented assembly

    This technique expresses the entries to themaster stiffness matrix as the sum ofentries in the elements stiffness matrix ()using the following relationship

    =

    and ()=

    for 1, 4, 1, 4, EFT , E F T

  • 8/10/2019 Finite Element Method-3

    39/54

    General ProcedurePre-processing

    4.Assembly

    B. Computer oriented assembly

    The example truss will be used to illustrate the

    application of the simplified assembler

    procedure.

    We will begin by setting the entries of the 8 8master stiffness matrix to zero. Thus

  • 8/10/2019 Finite Element Method-3

    40/54

    General ProcedurePre-processing

    4. Assembly

    B. Computer oriented assembly

    0 00 0

    0 00 00 0

    0 00 00 0

    0 00 0

    0 00 00 0

    0 00 00 0

    0 00 0 0 00 00 00 0

    0 00 0

    0 00 0 0 00 00 00 0

    0 00 0

    1234

    5678

    The numbers written against each row are the global

    DoF numbers.

  • 8/10/2019 Finite Element Method-3

    41/54

    General Procedure

    Pre-processing4. Assembly

    B. Computer oriented assembly

    Next we assemble the FET for all elements by

    computing the freedom pointers (FP)corresponding to all DoF associated with theelement. The FP for elements in the exampletruss are obtained from the relation

    () 2 12 The value 2 in the formula represents the number of

    DoF in the node under consideration and is thenode number.

  • 8/10/2019 Finite Element Method-3

    42/54

    General ProcedurePre-processing

    4.Assembly

    B. Computer oriented assembly:The FP

    the element are computed thus;

    () 2 1 1 1

    2 1 2 for node 1, and

    () 2 2 1 32 2 4 for node 2

  • 8/10/2019 Finite Element Method-3

    43/54

    General ProcedurePre-processing4.Assembly

    B. Computer oriented assembly This procedureis repeated for elements 2 and 3. The

    resulting for each element are collectedas shown below () 1,2,3,4 , () 3,4,5,6, , ()

    3,4,7,8

    The are then used to map entries in theelement stiffness matrix ()to the master stiffnessmatrix as follows

  • 8/10/2019 Finite Element Method-3

    44/54

    General ProcedurePre-processing4.Assembly

    B. Computer oriented assembly

    For element 1

    ()

    0.3536 0.35360.3536 0.3536

    0.3536 0.35360.3536 0.3536

    0.3536 0.35360.3536 0.3536 0.3536 0.35360.3536 0.3536

    12

    34

    Upon merging with, we have

  • 8/10/2019 Finite Element Method-3

    45/54

    General ProcedurePre-processing

    4.Assembly

    B. Computer oriented assembly

    For element 1

    0.3536 0.35360.3536 0.3536

    0.3536 0.35360.3536 0.3536

    0.3536 0.35360.3536 0.3536

    0.3536 0.35360.3536 0.3536

    0 00 0

    0 00 0

    0 00 0

    0 00 0

    0 00 0 0 00 00 00 0

    0 00 0

    0 00 0 0 00 00 00 0

    0 00 0

    1234

  • 8/10/2019 Finite Element Method-3

    46/54

    General ProcedurePre-processing

    4.Assembly

    B. Computer oriented assembly

    For element 2

    ()

    0 0

    0 1

    0 0

    0 10 00 1 0 00 1

    3

    456,

    and upon merging with, we have

  • 8/10/2019 Finite Element Method-3

    47/54

    General ProcedurePre-processing4.Assembly

    B. Computer oriented assembly

    For element 2

    0.3536 0.35360.3536 0.3536

    0.3536 0.35360.3536 0.3536

    0.3536 0.35360.3536 0.3536 0.3536 0.35360.3536 1.3536

    0 00 0

    0 00 0

    0 00 1 0 00 00 00 0

    0 00 1

    0 00 0

    0 00 0

    0 00 1

    0 00 0

    0 00 0

    0 00 0

    3456

  • 8/10/2019 Finite Element Method-3

    48/54

    General ProcedurePre-processing

    4.Assembly

    B. Computer oriented assembly

    For element 3

    ()

    0.3536 0.3536

    0.3536 0.3536

    0.3536 0.3536

    0.3536 0.35360.3536 0.35360.3536 0.3536 0.3536 0.35360.3536 0.3536

    3

    478

    When merged with , will result to

  • 8/10/2019 Finite Element Method-3

    49/54

    General ProcedurePre-processing

    4. Assembly

    B. Computer oriented assembly

    For element 3

    0.3536 0.35360.3536 0.3536

    0.3536 0.35360.3536 0.3536

    0.3536 0.35360.3536 0.3536

    0.7072 00 1.7072

    0 00 0

    0 00 0

    0 00 1

    0.3536 0.35360.3536 0.3536

    0 00 0

    0 00 10 0

    0 00.3536 0.3536

    0.3536 0.3536

    0 00 1

    0 00 00 0

    0 00.35360 0.35360.3536 0.3536

    34

    78

  • 8/10/2019 Finite Element Method-3

    50/54

    General ProcedurePre-processing4. Assembly

    B. Computer oriented assembly:The global stiffnessmatrixfor the truss system is therefore

    0.3536 0.35360.3536 0.3536

    0.3536 0.35360.3536 0.3536

    0.3536 0.35360.3536 0.3536

    0.7072 00 1.7072

    0 00 0

    0 00 0

    0 00 1

    0.3536 0.35360.3536 0.3536

    0 00 0 0 00 10 00 0

    0.3536 0.35360.3536 0.3536

    0 00 1 0 00 00 00 0

    0.35360 0.35360.3536 0.3536

  • 8/10/2019 Finite Element Method-3

    51/54

    General ProcedurePre-processing

    5. Boundary Conditions (BCs)

    a) Reduction Methodb) Modification Method

  • 8/10/2019 Finite Element Method-3

    52/54

    General ProcedurePre-processing

    5. Boundary Conditions (BCs)

    a) Reduction Method,, 0

    0.7072 00 1.7072 ,,

  • 8/10/2019 Finite Element Method-3

    53/54

    General ProcedurePre-processing

    5. Boundary Conditions (BCs)

    b) Modification Method

    0000000

    1 00 1 0 00 00 00 0

    0.7072 00 1.7072

    0 00 0 0 00 00 00 0

    0 00 0

    0 00 0

    0 00 00 0

    0 00 00 0

    1 00 1

    0 00 00 0

    0 01 00 1

    ,,,,,,,,

  • 8/10/2019 Finite Element Method-3

    54/54

    General Procedure

    6.Joint Displacement Solution


Recommended