Date post: | 16-May-2018 |
Category: |
Documents |
Upload: | phungtuong |
View: | 219 times |
Download: | 3 times |
FIR No. 629/14
u/s 420/465/467/468/471/120B IPCPS: Kalkaji, DelhiState versus Kaustav Ray etc
20.10.2015
Application on behalf of the accused Kaustav Ray for issuance of
directions to the IO to cancel the Look Out Circular.
Present: Ld. APP for the State.
Sh. M.N. Siddiqui Advocate, Sh. Karnail Singh Advocate along
with Sh. Sanjay Kumar Advocate for applicant/accused Kaustav
Ray.
IO SI S.K. Jha from Section2/EOW is also present and filed
reply to the above application of the applicant/accused.
Heard. Considered.
After considering the averments made in the application and
the reply filed by the IO, it is ordered that Look Out Circular (LOC)
opened against the accused/accused Kaustav Ray is hereby revoked till
further order. Applicant/accused Kaustav Ray is directed not to leave the
country without the prior permission of the court and he is further
directed to join the investigation and cooperate with the IO in the
investigation in the present case FIR other wise coercive steps will be
taken against applicant/accused. Copy of the order be given dasti to the
applicant/accused.
(VEENA RANI) Chief Metropolitan Magistrate
South East District / Saket Courts New Delhi/20.10.2015
FIR No.503/2007PS: Sarita Vihar State versus Aklhakh & others.
20.10.2015
Present: Ld. APP for the State.
Ld. Counsels for the accused persons.
Accused no. 1 Akhlaq Ali in person on bail.
Accused no:2 Sarik declared PO vide order dated 11015.
Accused no:3 Parvez Alam in person on bail.
Accused no:4Shahzad Alam in person on bail.
Accused No:5 Mohd. Salman, accused no:6 Mohd. Imran &
Accused no:7 Mohd. Wasi are absent. However, they are exempted on the
applications moved by their counsel for today only.
Accused no:8 Abbass @ Mistri in person on bail.
Accused no:9 Feroz in person on bail.
Accused no:10 Bhura @ Idris in person on bail.
Accused No:11 Iqbal Ahmed on bail.
Accused no:13 Shahnawaz S/o Ahmed Ali in person on bail.
Accused no:14 Islam in person on bail.
Accused no:15 Babu Khan in person on bail.
Accused no:16 Ikram in person on bail.
Accused no:17 Tahir @ Laloo in person on bail.
Accused no:18 Shahnawaz in person on bail.
Accused no:19 Kasim in person on bail.
Accused no:20 Rashid in person on bail.
Contd..........
2
Accused no:21 Kamil in person on bail.
Accused no:22 Nathu Giri in person on bail.
Accused no:23 Naresh Yadav in person on bail.
Accused no:24 Shoib Danish in person on bail.
Accused no:25 Jamaluddin in person on bail.
Accused no:26 Asif Mohd. Khan in person on bail.
Accused no:27 Liyakat Ali in person on bail.
Accused no:28 Kamaruddin in person on bail.
Accused no:29 Sultan is absent. He is exempted on an
application moved by his counsel for today only.
Accused no:30 Abdul Naseem @ Babu in person on bail.
Accused no:31 Saifullah Siddique in person on bail.
Accused no:32 Tahir Neta in person on bail.
Accused no:33 Masood Ahmed @ Raja ( Transporter) in person
on bail.
Proceeding against accused no:34 Nayabuddin @ Babu Neta
Barafwala already abated vide order dated 06042015.
Accused no:35 Amzad Khan @ Guddi Tanki Satlewala in person
on bail.
Accused no:36 Rafat Satlewala in person on bail.
Put up with connected case for scrutiny of documents on
28102015.
(VEENA RANI) Chief Metropolitan Magistrate
South East District / Saket Courts New Delhi/20.10.2015
FIR No.696/2007PS: Sarita Vihar State versus Naseer & others.
20.10.2015
Present: Ld. APP for the State.
Ld. Counsels for the accused persons.
Accused no. 1 Md. Nasir in person on bail.
Accused no. 2 Zakir remained unserved. Fresh process be
issued to accused no:2 Zakir, through IO concerned, for the next
date.
Accused no. 3 Mohd. Zuber absent. He is exempted on an
application moved by his counsel for today only.
Accused no. 4 Riyasaat Ali on bail.
Accused no. 5 Arif remained unserved. Fresh process be
issued to accused no:5 Arif, through IO concerned, for the next
date.
Accused no. 6 Mustkim remained unserved. Fresh
process be issued to accused no:6 Mustkim, through IO concerned,
for the next date.
Accused no. 7 Maksood in person on bail.
Accused no. 8 Abbass @ Mistri in person on bail.
Accused no. 9 Tahir in person on bail.
Accused no. 10 Kasim in person on bail.
Proceedings against accused no. 11 Nawab have been abated
vide order dated 26.08.15. Contd..........
2
Accused no. 12 Aslam in person on bail.
Accused no. 13 Shoaib Danish in person on bail.
Accused no. 14 Jamaludin in person on bail.
Accused no. 15 Asif Mohd Khan along with counsel. Fresh
Vakalatnama filed on behalf of accused no:15 Asif Mohd. Khan by Ld.
Counsel Sh. Tanveer A. Khan. An application for the grant of bail of
accused Asif Mohd. Khan filed.
Heard. Accused Asim Mohd. Khan is admitted to court bail on
his furnishing personal bail bond in the sum of Rs.15,000/ and a surety
bond in the like amount. Bail bond/surety bond furnished. Same are
accepted.
Accused no. 16 Liyakatali in person on bail.
Accused no. 17 Kamrudin in person on bail.
Accused no. 18 Masood Ahmed in person on bail.
Accused no. 19 Sultan Akhtar is absent. He is exempted on an
application moved by his counsel for today only.
Proceedings against accused no. 20 Babu Neta Barafwala have
already been abated vide order dated 23.07.15.
Accused no. 21 Saifiullah in person on bail.
Accused no. 22 Tahir Neta Abul Fazal Wala in person along with
counsel. An application for the grant of his bail filed. Heard. Accused Tahir
Neta Abul Fazal Wala is admitted to court bail on his furnishing personal
bail bond in the sum of Rs.15,000/ and a surety bond in the like amount.
Bail bond/surety bond furnished. Same are accepted.
Contd.........
3
Accused no. 23 Amzad in person on bail.
Accused no. 24 Qayuum in person on bail.
Accused no. 25 Sharif in person on bail.
Accused no. 26 Riyaz in person on bail.
Put up for the service report of accused no:2, 5 & 6 and scrutiny
of documents qua the all other accused persons on 28102015. Ahlmad is
directed to issue summons to the accused no:2,5 & 6, through IO,
immediately for the next date.
(VEENA RANI) Chief Metropolitan Magistrate
South East District / Saket Courts New Delhi/20.10.2015
CC No:
Statement of
on oath.
RO&AC (VEENA RANI) Chief Metropolitan Magistrate
South East District / Saket Courts New Delhi/20.10.2015
State Vs.
FIR No:
PW
Statement of
on oath.
Xxxxxxxxxby ld. Counsel for accused.
RO&AC (VEENA RANI) Chief Metropolitan Magistrate
South East District / Saket Courts New Delhi/
FIR No.
PS:
State vs.
20.10.2015
Present: Ld. APP for the State.
(VEENA RANI) Chief Metropolitan Magistrate
South East District / Saket Courts New Delhi/20.10.2015
CC No. 29/01, 60/01, 31/01, 38/01, 33/01, 36/01, 37/01, 34/01, 35/01, 30/01, 32/01Arun Dev 20.10.2015
Present: Complainant in person with Counsel.
IO is not present.
Let previous order be complied for 03.11.15.
(VEENA RANI) Chief Metropolitan Magistrate
South East District / Saket Courts New Delhi/20.10.2015
CC No. 65/01 Sushil Arora versus Arun Dev Builders 20.10.2015
Present: Counsel for the complainant.
IO is not present.
Let previous order be complied for 03.11.15.
(VEENA RANI) Chief Metropolitan Magistrate
South East District / Saket Courts New Delhi/20.10.2015
FIR No. 565/06PS: Badarpur, Crime Branch State versus Raju etc
20.10.2015
Present: Ld. APP for the State.
Accused Sukhvinder on bail with Counsel.
Accused Raju absent.
An exemption application moved on behalf of accused Raju. In
view of the reason mentioned in the application the exemption is allowed
for today only.
No PW is present today. Process not received back.
Put up for remaining PE on 23.11.15. PWs be summoned for
date fixed.
(VEENA RANI) Chief Metropolitan Magistrate
South East District / Saket Courts New Delhi/20.10.2015
FIR No. 84/05PS: GK, Crime Branch State versus TB Rai etc
20.10.2015
Present: Ld. APP for the State.
Proceedings against accused BS Meena abated vide order dated
20.01.15.
Accused TB Rai is PO.
Accused Mahender Singh, RC Girdhar on bail.
Accused Chotey Lal is absent. Counsel for accused Chotey Lal
submits that accused is in JC in case bearing FIR No. 148/14, PS Neb
Sarai, u/s 302 / 120 B IPC and further request that production warrants of
the said accused be issued.
Submissions heard.
In view of the aforesaid issue production warrants against the
accused Chotey Lal for 03.12.15 and it should be mentioned that accused
is on bail in this case.
(VEENA RANI) Chief Metropolitan Magistrate
South East District / Saket Courts New Delhi/20.10.2015
FIR No. 342/00PS: Lajpat Nagar State versus Animesh Das etc
20.10.2015
Present: Ld. APP for the State.
Accused Animesh Das, Mohan Joshi and Lal Singh on bail with
Counsel.
At request put up for arguments on charge on 04.01.16.
(VEENA RANI) Chief Metropolitan Magistrate
South East District / Saket Courts New Delhi/20.10.2015
RC No. 43A/98CBI versus Rajkumar Sharma etc
20.10.2015
Present: Ld. APP for the CBI.
Accused Anita Rai on bail with Counsel Sh. KK Sharma.
Accused Raj Kumar Sharma absent.
An exemption application moved on behalf of accused Raj
Kumar wherein it is stated that on last date of hearing application for
issuing production warrants was filed, however now accused is on bail and
is unwell. In view of the aforesaid, exemption is allowed for today only.
No PW is present today. Put up for remaining PE on 11.01.16.
PWs be summoned for date fixed.
(VEENA RANI) Chief Metropolitan Magistrate
South East District / Saket Courts New Delhi/20.10.2015
FIR No. 128/06PS: KalkajiState versus Supriyo Sikdar
20.10.2015
Present: Ld. APP for the State.
Accused absent.
An exemption application moved on behalf of accused. In view of
the reason mentioned in the application the exemption is allowed for today
only.
IO is not present. IO be called with deficient copy of charge
sheet for 27.11.15.
(VEENA RANI) Chief Metropolitan Magistrate
South East District / Saket Courts New Delhi/20.10.2015
FIR No. 193/11PS: KalkajiState versus Tribhuvan Sharma
20.10.2015
Present: Ld. APP for the State.
Accused Tribhuvan Sharma, Manish Kumar, Girish Sharma on
bail with Counsel.
Ld. APP for the State submits that IO be called with respect to
certain clarifications and also for filing supplementary charge sheet.
Submissions heard.
In view of the aforesaid, IO be called for 19.12.15.
(VEENA RANI) Chief Metropolitan Magistrate
South East District / Saket Courts New Delhi/20.10.2015
FIR No. 133/05PS: Lajpat Nagar State versus RK Dawer etc
20.10.2015
Present: Ld. APP for the State.
Accused Satnam Singh, RK Dawar and Suneet Kumar on bail
with Counsel.
It is submitted by the Counsel for the accused that the next date
of hearing before Hon'ble High Court is 09.12.15.
Submissions heard.
Put up for further proceedings on 21.12.15.
(VEENA RANI) Chief Metropolitan Magistrate
South East District / Saket Courts New Delhi/20.10.2015
CC No. 79/01Usha Kalra versus SHO PS CR Park etc
20.10.2015
Present: Complainant in person with Counsel.
Vakalatnama filed on behalf of the complainant.
Let Action Taken Report be called for 05.12.15 from the
concerned IO.
Complainant is directed to provide extra copy of the complaint to
the Naib Court concerned for onward transmission to the concerned police
station. Copy of this order be also sent to the concerned police station.
(VEENA RANI) Chief Metropolitan Magistrate
South East District / Saket Courts New Delhi/20.10.2015
FIR No. 128/06 PS: Kalkaji, Crime Branch State versus Mohd. Afroz Yunus etc
20.10.2015
Present: Ld. APP for the State.
Accused Deepak Kumar is PO.
Accused Mohd. Afroz absent.
An exemption application moved on behalf of accused Mohd.
Afroz. In view of the reason mentioned in the application the exemption is
allowed for today only.
IO be called and case be fixed for arguments on charge on behalf
of the State for 27.11.15.
(VEENA RANI) Chief Metropolitan Magistrate
South East District / Saket Courts New Delhi/20.10.2015
FIR No. 128/06PS: Kalkaji, Crime Branch State versus Pradeep Kumar
20.10.2015
Present: Ld. APP for the State.
Accused is PO.
IO is not present.
IO be called for query regarding the missing of the last page of
the complaint on which endorsement was made by the DO, for 27.11.15.
(VEENA RANI) Chief Metropolitan Magistrate
South East District / Saket Courts New Delhi/20.10.2015
FIR No. 211/13PS: EOW State versus Cancellation
20.10.2015
Present: Ld. APP for the State.
None for the complainant.
As none is present for the complainant, put up for arguments on
the protest petition on 30.11.15.
(VEENA RANI) Chief Metropolitan Magistrate
South East District / Saket Courts New Delhi/20.10.2015
FIR No. 734/98PS: OIA State versus Gaurav Sharma etc
20.10.2015
Present: Ld. APP for the State.
Accused Gaurav Sharma, Neeraj Gulati and Jai Prakash on
bail.
Erstwhile Ahlmads Amit Tanwar and Shyam Singh are not
present. Notice be issued to them to appear with reply on 16.12.15.
(VEENA RANI) Chief Metropolitan Magistrate
South East District / Saket Courts New Delhi/20.10.2015
FIR No. 390/11PS: OIAState versus Gulabo
20.10.2015
Present: Ld. APP for the State.
Accused on bail with Counsel.
PW HC Kailash is present, who submits that he is not well.
Submissions heard.
In view of the aforesaid PW present is discharged unexamined
for today only.
Put up for remaining PE on 18.11.15.
(VEENA RANI) Chief Metropolitan Magistrate
South East District / Saket Courts New Delhi/20.10.2015
CC No. 06/01PK Chakravarty versus Sunil Kumar Day
20.10.2015
Present: Proxy Counsel for the complainant.
Proxy Counsel for the complainant seeks adjournment as main
Counsel is not available today.
Submissions heard.
Put up for clarifications / arguments on the summoning of the
accused for 21.11.15.
(VEENA RANI) Chief Metropolitan Magistrate
South East District / Saket Courts New Delhi/20.10.2015
FIR No. 1059/14PS: Amar Colony State versus Rahul Kalra
20.10.2015
Present: Ld. APP for the State.
Accused on bail with Counsel.
Ld. APP for the State submits that certain clarifications are
required hence IO be called.
Submissions heard.
Put up for arguments on behalf of the State on 04.11.15 and IO
be called for date fixed.
(VEENA RANI) Chief Metropolitan Magistrate
South East District / Saket Courts New Delhi/20.10.2015
RC No. BD I/2013/E/0006CBI versus Sanjeev Dixit
20.10.2015
Present: Ld. APP for the CBI.
Accused produced from Dasna jail alongwith Counsel.
Vakalatnama filed on behalf of the accused.
Counsel for the accused seeks adjournment for arguments on
charge as she has been recently engaged.
Submissions heard.
Put up for arguments on charge on 30.10.15.
(VEENA RANI) Chief Metropolitan Magistrate
South East District / Saket Courts New Delhi/20.10.2015
FIR No. 30/11PS: SL ColonyState versus Hakikat Ali
20.10.2015
Present: Ld. APP for the State.
Accused on bail.
No PW is present.
Put up for remaining PE on 15.01.16. PWs be summoned for
date fixed.
(VEENA RANI) Chief Metropolitan Magistrate
South East District / Saket Courts New Delhi/20.10.2015
FIR No. 67/14PS: Crime Branch State versus Prem Pal Yadav etc
20.10.2015
Present: Ld. APP for the State.
Accused Vinod Kachanwaye on bail with Counsel.
Accused Prem Pal Yadav and Dilip Sisodia absent.
Exemption applications moved on behalf of accused Prem Pal
Yadav and Dilip Sisodia. In view of the reason mentioned in the
applications the exemption is allowed for today only.
PW HC Hanuman is present. Discharged unexamined for today
only as two of the accused persons are not present.
No other PW is present. Put up for remaining PE on 28.01.16.
PWs be summoned for date fixed.
(VEENA RANI) Chief Metropolitan Magistrate
South East District / Saket Courts New Delhi/20.10.2015
FIR No. 155/12PS: EOW State versus Sandeep Sehgal etc
20.10.2015
Present: Ld. APP for the State.
Accused Sandeep Sehgal and Sapana Sehgal on bail with proxy
Counsel.
Adjournment sought on behalf of the accused persons as main
Counsel is not available.
Submissions heard.
Put up for arguments on the cancellation of bail of accused
persons on 06.11.15 at 12:00 noon.
(VEENA RANI) Chief Metropolitan Magistrate
South East District / Saket Courts New Delhi/20.10.2015
FIR No. 24/14PS: Crime Branch State versus Ajay Singh Yadav etc
20.10.2015
Present: Ld. APP for the State.
Accused Ajay Singh Yadav produced from JC.
Accused Amit Chauhan on bail.
Accused seeks adjournment as their Counsels are not available
for addressing arguments.
Submissions heard.
Put up for arguments on charge on 18.11.15.
(VEENA RANI) Chief Metropolitan Magistrate
South East District / Saket Courts New Delhi/20.10.2015
FIR No. 68/15PS: Crime Branch State versus Vipin Kumar
20.10.2015
Present: Ld. APP for the State.
Accused produced from Ludhiana jail.
Accused seeks adjournment as today his Counsel is not
available.
Submissions heard.
Put up for arguments on charge on 17.11.15, rehnumai on
04.11.15.
(VEENA RANI) Chief Metropolitan Magistrate
South East District / Saket Courts New Delhi/20.10.2015
FIR No. 425/15PS: Jamia Nagar State versus Ranjit etc
20.10.2015
Present: Ld. APP for the State.
Accused Ranjeet and Ismail produced from JC alongwith Ms.
Pinky Maheshwari, Counsel for the accused persons from Legal Aid.
Counsel for the accused persons seeks adjournment for
arguments on charge.
Submissions heard.
Put up for arguments on charge on 04.11.15.
(VEENA RANI) Chief Metropolitan Magistrate
South East District / Saket Courts New Delhi/20.10.2015
FIR No. 584/99PS: Lajpat Nagar, Crime Branch State versus Rajan Vachani
20.10.2015
Present: Ld. APP for the State.
Vide order dated 07.08.15 open NBWs have already been issued
against the accused Reeta Murlidahan and Neeraj Murlidahan.
Accused Rajan Vachani absent.
Counsel for accused Rajan Vachani prays that NBW of accused
were stayed till today, however he could not appear due to some exigency
and further requests that NBW be stayed till next date of hearing.
Submissions heard.
In view of the aforesaid NBW of accused Rajan Vachani are
stayed till next date of hearing only with the directions to appear before
this Court on date fixed.
Put up for appearance of the accused Rajan Vachani and further
proceedings on 01.12.15.
(VEENA RANI) Chief Metropolitan Magistrate
South East District / Saket Courts New Delhi/20.10.2015
FIR No. 236/13PS: EOW State versus Harjinder Pal Singh
20.10.2015
Present: Ld. APP for the State.
IO of the case in person.
Certain clarifications are sought from the IO who seeks time for
the same.
In view of the aforesaid, put up for consideration on 06.11.15.
(VEENA RANI) Chief Metropolitan Magistrate
South East District / Saket Courts New Delhi/20.10.2015
FIR No. 191/06 PS: KM Pur State versus Baldev Raj Sharma
20.10.2015
Present: Ld. APP for the State.
IO of the case in person.
Certain clarifications are sought from the IO who seeks time for
the same.
In view of the aforesaid, put up for consideration on 16.11.15.
(VEENA RANI) Chief Metropolitan Magistrate
South East District / Saket Courts New Delhi/20.10.2015
FIR No. 564/06PS: Okhla Industrial Area State versus Rajbir
20.10.2015
Present: Ld. APP for the State.
IO is not present, however request received on behalf of the IO.
Put up for consideration on 21.11.15 and IO be called for date
fixed.
(VEENA RANI) Chief Metropolitan Magistrate
South East District / Saket Courts New Delhi/20.10.2015
CC No. 62/01Rakesh Chauhan versus RK Arora etc
20.10.2015
Present: None for the complainant.
Put up for consideration on 02.01.16.
(VEENA RANI) Chief Metropolitan Magistrate
South East District / Saket Courts New Delhi/20.10.2015
FIR No. 78/13PS: CR Park State versus Abhishek etc
20.10.2015
Present: Ld. APP for the State.
Accused persons absent.
Process of accused not received back. Same be awaited. In the
meanwhile issue fresh summons to the accused persons through IO
concerned for 08.12.15.
(VEENA RANI) Chief Metropolitan Magistrate
South East District / Saket Courts New Delhi/20.10.2015
DD No. 10B dated 15.10.15PS: Lodhi Colony State versus Ankur Kapoor
20.10.2015
File / Kalandra received from the Court of Sh. Pawan Kumar,
Ld. Evening Judge, Court No. 1, South East District, Saket Courts, New
Delhi.
Present: None.
Seen order dated 19.10.15 passed by Ld. Evening Judge Court
No. 1. In view of the reason mentioned in the order dated 19.10.15, the
present case / kalandra be sent to the court of Sh. Pawan Kumar, Ld.
Metropolitan Magistrate, South East District, Saket Courts, New Delhi.
Parties are directed to appear before the concerned Court on
23.10.15 at 2:00 pm. File / Kalandra be sent to the concerned Court
immediately.
(VEENA RANI) Chief Metropolitan Magistrate
South East District / Saket Courts New Delhi/20.10.2015
CC No. 238/3/14Veena versus Harvinder Singh
20.10.2015
File received from the Court of Ms. Charu Gupta, Ld. MM,
South East District, Saket Courts, New Delhi.
Present: None.
Seen order dated 20.10.15 passed by Ld. MM. In view of the
reason mentioned in the order dated 20.10.15, the present case stands
withdrawn from the Court of Ms. Charu Gupta, Ld. MM, South East
District and transferred in the Court of Ms. Vandana Jain, Ld. MM, South
East District, Saket, New Delhi.
Parties are directed to appear before the transferee Court on
23.10.15 at 2:00 pm. File be sent to the transferee Court immediately.
(VEENA RANI) Chief Metropolitan Magistrate
South East District / Saket Courts New Delhi/20.10.2015
FIR No. 420/95PS: CR Park State versus Vinod Kumar Soin
20.10.2015
File received from the Court of Ms. Anu Aggarwal, Ld. MM,
South East District, Saket Courts, New Delhi.
Present: None.
Seen order dated 08.10.15 passed by Ld. MM. In view of the
reason mentioned in the order dated 08.10.15, the present case stands
withdrawn from the Court of Ms. Anu Aggarwal, Ld. MM, South East
District and transferred in the Court of Ms. Vasundhra Chhaunkar, Ld.
MM, South East District, Saket, New Delhi.
Parties are directed to appear before the transferee Court on
26.10.15 at 2:00 pm. File be sent to the transferee Court immediately.
(VEENA RANI) Chief Metropolitan Magistrate
South East District / Saket Courts New Delhi/20.10.2015
FIR No. 42/14 U/s 420/120B IPC PS: EOW
Statement of process server SI Shailendra Kumar, No. D225, Section 6, EOW, Mandir Marg, New Delhi. On SA
On 03.09.15 I was posted at Section 6, EOW, Mandir Marg, New Delhi. On that date, I went to the house of accused Girish Chopra S/o Gulshan Lal Chopra, R/o D3, Ansal Villa Satbari, Mehrauli, New Delhi – but the accused was not traced out at the aforesaid address as the premises was found locked. I enquired from the neighbours but no whereabouts of the accused were available. I also read the proclamation u/s 82 CrPC against the accused publicly in loud voice near his residence. As a result I pasted one copy of the process u/s 82 CrPC at the last known address of the accused as well as other pasted at the notice board of Court. I also got published proclamation u/s 82 CrPC against the accused persons in Hindi newspaper Hindustan, Delhi on 09.09.15 and in English newspaper The Times of India, Delhi on 09.09.15. My report in this regard is Ex.CW1/A which bears my signature at points A. My above report is correct.
RO&AC (VEENA RANI) Chief Metropolitan Magistrate
South East District / Saket Courts New Delhi/20.10.2015
FIR No. 42/14 U/s 420/120B IPC PS: EOW
20.10.2015
Present: Ld. APP for the State.
SI Shailendra Kumar, IO of the case is present. His statement
recorded separately. In view of the statement of process server and his
report and also the fact that the publication u/s 82 CrPC was got
published in the Hindi newspaper Hindustan, Delhi on 09.09.15 and in
English newspaper The Times of India on 09.09.15, I am of the opinion
that accused Girish Chopra is intentionally avoiding the process of the
Court and the accused failed to put his appearance within the stipulated
time. Hence, he is declared proclaimed absconder. Accused be arrested and
produced in the Court as and when his whereabouts are known to the
State or any person inform the police about the whereabouts of the
accused. Copy of statement and order be given to the IO.
(VEENA RANI) Chief Metropolitan Magistrate
South East District / Saket Courts New Delhi/20.10.2015
FIR No. 69/14 U/s 420/120B IPC PS: EOW
Statement of process server SI Shailendra Kumar, No. D225, Section 6, EOW, Mandir Marg, New Delhi. On SA
On 03.09.15 I was posted at Section 6, EOW, Mandir Marg, New Delhi. On that date, I went to the house of accused Girish Chopra S/o Gulshan Lal Chopra, R/o D3, Ansal Villa Satbari, Mehrauli, New Delhi – but the accused was not traced out at the aforesaid address as the premises was found locked. I enquired from the neighbours but no whereabouts of the accused were available. I also read the proclamation u/s 82 CrPC against the accused publicly in loud voice near his residence. As a result I pasted one copy of the process u/s 82 CrPC at the last known address of the accused as well as other pasted at the notice board of Court. I also got published proclamation u/s 82 CrPC against the accused persons in Hindi newspaper Hindustan, Delhi on 09.09.15 and in English newspaper The Times of India, Delhi on 09.09.15. My report in this regard is Ex.CW1/A which bears my signature at points A. My above report is correct.
RO&AC (VEENA RANI) Chief Metropolitan Magistrate
South East District / Saket Courts New Delhi/20.10.2015
FIR No. 69/14 U/s 420/120B IPC PS: EOW
20.10.2015
Present: Ld. APP for the State.
SI Shailendra Kumar, IO of the case is present. His statement
recorded separately. In view of the statement of process server and his
report and also the fact that the publication u/s 82 CrPC was got
published in the Hindi newspaper Hindustan, Delhi on 09.09.15 and in
English newspaper The Times of India on 09.09.15, I am of the opinion
that accused Girish Chopra is intentionally avoiding the process of the
Court and the accused failed to put his appearance within the stipulated
time. Hence, he is declared proclaimed absconder. Accused be arrested and
produced in the Court as and when his whereabouts are known to the
State or any person inform the police about the whereabouts of the
accused. Copy of statement and order be given to the IO.
(VEENA RANI) Chief Metropolitan Magistrate
South East District / Saket Courts New Delhi/20.10.2015
FIR No. 51/14 U/s 420/120B IPC PS: EOW
Statement of process server SI Shailendra Kumar, No. D225, Section 6, EOW, Mandir Marg, New Delhi. On SA
On 03.09.15 I was posted at Section 6, EOW, Mandir Marg, New Delhi. On that date, I went to the house of accused Girish Chopra S/o Gulshan Lal Chopra, R/o D3, Ansal Villa Satbari, Mehrauli, New Delhi – but the accused was not traced out at the aforesaid address as the premises was found locked. I enquired from the neighbours but no whereabouts of the accused were available. I also read the proclamation u/s 82 CrPC against the accused publicly in loud voice near his residence. As a result I pasted one copy of the process u/s 82 CrPC at the last known address of the accused as well as other pasted at the notice board of Court. I also got published proclamation u/s 82 CrPC against the accused persons in Hindi newspaper Hindustan, Delhi on 09.09.15 and in English newspaper The Times of India, Delhi on 09.09.15. My report in this regard is Ex.CW1/A which bears my signature at points A. My above report is correct.
RO&AC (VEENA RANI) Chief Metropolitan Magistrate
South East District / Saket Courts New Delhi/20.10.2015
FIR No. 51/14 U/s 420/120B IPC PS: EOW
20.10.2015
Present: Ld. APP for the State.
SI Shailendra Kumar, IO of the case is present. His statement
recorded separately. In view of the statement of process server and his
report and also the fact that the publication u/s 82 CrPC was got
published in the Hindi newspaper Hindustan, Delhi on 09.09.15 and in
English newspaper The Times of India on 09.09.15, I am of the opinion
that accused Girish Chopra is intentionally avoiding the process of the
Court and the accused failed to put his appearance within the stipulated
time. Hence, he is declared proclaimed absconder. Accused be arrested and
produced in the Court as and when his whereabouts are known to the
State or any person inform the police about the whereabouts of the
accused. Copy of statement and order be given to the IO.
(VEENA RANI) Chief Metropolitan Magistrate
South East District / Saket Courts New Delhi/20.10.2015
FIR No. 43/14U/s 420/120B IPC PS: EOW
Statement of process server SI Shailendra Kumar, No. D225, Section 6, EOW, Mandir Marg, New Delhi. On SA
On 03.09.15 I was posted at Section 6, EOW, Mandir Marg, New Delhi. On that date, I went to the house of accused Girish Chopra S/o Gulshan Lal Chopra, R/o D3, Ansal Villa Satbari, Mehrauli, New Delhi – but the accused was not traced out at the aforesaid address as the premises was found locked. I enquired from the neighbours but no whereabouts of the accused were available. I also read the proclamation u/s 82 CrPC against the accused publicly in loud voice near his residence. As a result I pasted one copy of the process u/s 82 CrPC at the last known address of the accused as well as other pasted at the notice board of Court. I also got published proclamation u/s 82 CrPC against the accused persons in Hindi newspaper Hindustan, Delhi on 09.09.15 and in English newspaper The Times of India, Delhi on 09.09.15. My report in this regard is Ex.CW1/A which bears my signature at points A. My above report is correct.
RO&AC (VEENA RANI) Chief Metropolitan Magistrate
South East District / Saket Courts New Delhi/20.10.2015
FIR No. 43/14U/s 420/120B IPC PS: EOW
20.10.2015
Present: Ld. APP for the State.
SI Shailendra Kumar, IO of the case is present. His statement
recorded separately. In view of the statement of process server and his
report and also the fact that the publication u/s 82 CrPC was got
published in the Hindi newspaper Hindustan, Delhi on 09.09.15 and in
English newspaper The Times of India on 09.09.15, I am of the opinion
that accused Girish Chopra is intentionally avoiding the process of the
Court and the accused failed to put his appearance within the stipulated
time. Hence, he is declared proclaimed absconder. Accused be arrested and
produced in the Court as and when his whereabouts are known to the
State or any person inform the police about the whereabouts of the
accused. Copy of statement and order be given to the IO.
(VEENA RANI) Chief Metropolitan Magistrate
South East District / Saket Courts New Delhi/20.10.2015
FIR No. 61/08PS: BadarpurState versus Bhuvnesh Chaturvedi etc
20.10.2015
Report of process u/s 82 CrPC against the accused Bhuvnesh
Chaturvedi, Mukesh Chaturvedi and Rakesh Chaturvedi.
Present: Ld. APP for the State.
IO in person.
Put up for recording of the statement of the process server for
26.10.15.
(VEENA RANI) Chief Metropolitan Magistrate
South East District / Saket Courts New Delhi/20.10.2015
MCA No. 34/15Punjab & Sind Bank versus Simran Toys etc
20.10.2015
Present: None for the bank.
None for the objector.
Despite issuance of court notice to the objector no one is
appearing on behalf of the objector for the last many dates. Hence the
objection application is hereby dismissed in default as well as for non
prosecution. File / application be consigned to Record Room.
(VEENA RANI) Chief Metropolitan Magistrate
South East District / Saket Courts New Delhi/20.10.2015
FIR No. PS: State versus
20.10.2015
Present: Ld. APP for the State.
(VEENA RANI) Chief Metropolitan Magistrate
South East District / Saket Courts New Delhi/20.10.2015
FIR No. PS: State versus
20.10.2015
Present: Ld. APP for the State.
(VEENA RANI) Chief Metropolitan Magistrate
South East District / Saket Courts New Delhi/20.10.2015
FIR No. PS: State versus
20.10.2015
Present: Ld. APP for the State.
(VEENA RANI) Chief Metropolitan Magistrate
South East District / Saket Courts New Delhi/20.10.2015
FIR No. PS: State versus
20.10.2015
Present: Ld. APP for the State.
(VEENA RANI) Chief Metropolitan Magistrate
South East District / Saket Courts New Delhi/20.10.2015
FIR No. PS: State versus
20.10.2015
Present: Ld. APP for the State.
(VEENA RANI) Chief Metropolitan Magistrate
South East District / Saket Courts New Delhi/20.10.2015